Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 80 references

Twist-induced magnetic topological phase transition in stacked altermagnetic CrO

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Commensurate twisting transforms stacked bilayer CrO from an antiferromagnetic Dirac semimetal into a Weyl semimetal.

desk verdict A promising twist-driven magnetic Weyl proposal in CrO, but the central 'generic k' claim is contradicted by the Discussion's 'corners of the BZ' and the paper never reports the actual k-vectors. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.01235 v1 pith:TJIC2PXH submitted 2026-08-02 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Zi-Hao Ding , Ze-Feng Gao , Xiang-Hua Kong , Peng-Jie Guo , Zhong-Yi Lu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismtwistedbilayerWeylsemimetalmagnetictopologicalphasetransitionmonolayerCrOspinsymmetryfirst-principlescalculationmoirésuperlattice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that rotating one layer of a stacked bilayer of the altermagnetic material CrO by a commensurate twist angle is enough to change its magnetic and electronic identity: a conventional antiferromagnetic Dirac semimetal becomes a d-wave altermagnetic bipolarized Weyl semimetal, or, for one stacking, an unconventional compensated magnetic Weyl semimetal. The conversion is not accidental. The twist breaks the symmetry that pairs opposite spins in the untwisted bilayer, turning each Dirac point into two spin-polarized Weyl points, and it preserves a combined spin-rotation/time-reversal symmetry that keeps those Weyl points at generic momenta in the Brillouin zone. If the claim holds, twist angle becomes a control knob for magnetic topology in two-dimensional materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin symmetry $\{C_2T||C_{2z}T\}$: a symmetry operation combining a twofold rotation with time reversal, acting jointly on spin and spatial degrees of freedom, with an additional twofold rotation about the z-axis. The paper argues that this symmetry exists at every momentum in the Brillouin zone of the twisted AB bilayer, is preserved for any commensurate twist angle, and forces the four pairs of Weyl points to sit at generic momenta rather than on high-symmetry lines. The transition mechanism is the twist-induced breaking of the $\{C_2||I\}$-type symmetry of the untwisted AB stacking, which converts an antiferromagnet into an altermagnet and releases each Dirac crossing into a pair of Weyl points.

What would settle it

Compute the symmetry and band structure for another commensurate twist angle of AB-stacked bilayer CrO, such as a (4,1) or (5,2) coincidence-site supercell: if at any commensurate angle the $\{C_2T||C_{2z}T\}$ symmetry is absent, or the eight Weyl points vanish or move onto high-symmetry lines, the claimed angle-independence fails. Experimentally, angle-resolved photoemission on a tear-and-stack CrO bilayer at a different commensurate angle would test whether the predicted Fermi arcs and Weyl points actually appear.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that interlayer twisting by a commensurate angle drives a magnetic topological phase transition in stacked bilayer CrO. In the untwisted AB stacking, the material is a conventional antiferromagnetic Dirac semimetal with four spin-degenerate linear crossings on high-symmetry lines. Twisting breaks the effective time-reversal symmetry that pairs opposite spins, converting the bilayer into a d-wave altermagnet; each Dirac point then splits into two spin-polarized Weyl points, giving eight Weyl points at generic momenta protected by the spin symmetry $\{C_2T||C_{2z}T\}$. The same mechanism applies to the 22.62° twist, and AA stacking behaves like AB, while AC stacking becomes an unconventional compensated magnetic Weyl semimetal. The authors conclude that the Weyl semimetal phase is a stable, symmetry-protected consequence of commensurate twisting rather than a fine-tuned feature of one angle.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that every commensurate twist angle produces the Weyl phase rests on the assertion that the spin symmetry $\{C_2T||C_{2z}T\}$ survives any commensurate twist, and the paper demonstrates this for 36.87° and 22.62° only.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Twist angle becomes a static control knob: the same CrO bilayer can be switched between an antiferromagnetic Dirac semimetal and a d-wave altermagnetic Weyl semimetal by stacking and twisting, without chemical doping.
  • Because the protecting symmetry survives any commensurate twist angle, the Weyl phase should persist across a range of angles rather than being limited to a single magic value.
  • The Weyl points at generic momenta generate Fermi arcs that extend over a large portion of the edge Brillouin zone, making them accessible to angle-resolved photoemission and useful for low-dissipation edge transport.
  • Twisting also rotates the magnetic easy axis of the AB bilayer from in-plane to out-of-plane, a feature relevant for spintronic devices.
  • The stacking choice selects the outcome: AB and AA stackings reach the d-wave altermagnetic Weyl semimetal, while AC stacking reaches a distinct unconventional compensated magnetic Weyl semimetal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The symmetry argument should transfer to other d-wave altermagnetic monolayers with the appropriate magnetic sublattice, so twisting may be a general route to two-dimensional magnetic Weyl semimetals rather than a CrO-specific effect.
  • A natural extension is measuring anomalous Hall or chiral-anomaly transport as a function of twist angle; the paper predicts the phase but not the transport coefficients, so angle-dependent transport experiments would provide new tests.
  • The mechanism suggests that heterobilayers combining one altermagnetic layer with a nonmagnetic layer could also host symmetry-protected Weyl points, since only the combined spin symmetry and the breaking of the inversion-like pairing are required.
  • The argument covers commensurate angles only; incommensurate moiré cells could either retain the Weyl phase or gap it out, which remains an open question.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the effect of interlayer twisting on the magnetic and topological properties of stacked bilayer CrO, combining symmetry analysis with first-principles DFT+U calculations. It reports that monolayer CrO is a d-wave altermagnetic bipolarized Weyl semimetal, that the AA, AB, and AC stackings become antiferromagnetic Dirac semimetals, and that applying commensurate twist angles (36.87° and 22.62°) to the AB stacking transforms it into a d-wave altermagnetic bipolarized Weyl semimetal with eight Weyl points claimed to be at generic k-points and protected by the spin symmetry {C2T||C2zT}. The authors further claim that this spin symmetry is preserved for any commensurate twist angle, making the Weyl phase a robust consequence of twisting. They also report that twisted AA stacking behaves similarly and twisted AC stacking becomes an unconventional compensated magnetic Weyl semimetal, and they compute topological edge states as evidence.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper would establish a new symmetry-based route to engineering magnetic topological phases via twist angles, which is a timely and potentially important contribution to both altermagnetism and twistronics. The symmetry analysis is clean and the identification of Weyl points for the two computed angles, together with the surface spectral function calculations, provides concrete falsifiable predictions. The use of first-principles calculations with explicit supercells is appropriate. However, the significance is currently undermined by an internal contradiction about the location of the Weyl points (generic k-points vs. BZ corners), an over-broad robustness claim supported by only two angles, and very small magnetic energy differences that may not be numerically reliable. These issues must be resolved before the central claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract/Introduction vs. Discussion and conclusion] The Abstract and Introduction state that "four pairs of Weyl points appear at generic k points" and that the protection by {C2T||C2zT} allows Weyl points at generic positions, whereas the Discussion and conclusion states that "a key common feature is the existence of eight spin-polarized Weyl points protected by {C2T||C2zT} spin symmetry at the four corners of the BZ." These two statements are mutually exclusive in a tetragonal Brillouin zone, where the corners are the high-symmetry M points. This contradiction directly affects the paper's central novelty claim. Please provide the explicit k-vectors of the Weyl points (e.g., in units of the reciprocal lattice vectors) for both 36.87° and 22.62°, and clarify whether the points sit at M or at generic positions. If they sit at the corners, the claimed contrast with conventional Weyl semimetals collapses and the protection mechanism must be re-evaluated.
  2. [Results and analysis (tb-AB 36.87° and 22.62°) and Discussion and conclusion] The robustness claim that "regardless of the commensurate twist angle, the spin symmetry {C2T||C2zT} remains stable" is supported by only two commensurate angles, 36.87° and 22.62°. The paper does not provide a general symmetry proof for arbitrary (M,N) commensurate twists, nor does it rule out the possibility that some angles may break this spin symmetry, e.g., through a different magnetic ground state or a different lattice symmetry. Since the central conclusion is that the Weyl phase is a robust consequence of commensurate twisting rather than a fine-tuned feature of a specific angle, this gap is load-bearing. Please either provide a general symmetry argument covering all commensurate angles or explicitly qualify the claim to the two studied angles.
  3. [Results and analysis (magnetic ground states of tb-AB)] The magnetic ground state selection for the twisted bilayers rests on energy differences of only 0.068 meV/Cr (36.87°, G-type favored) and 0.195 meV/Cr (22.62°, C-type favored). These values are extremely small, within the range of typical DFT numerical errors and vdW functional uncertainties. If the true ground state were different, the predicted topological phase might not be realized. Please report convergence tests with respect to k-mesh, energy cutoff, Hubbard U, and the vdW functional, and discuss whether the ground-state assignment remains stable. If both G-type and C-type configurations support the Weyl phase, state this explicitly and show the band structure for both, as this would mitigate the concern.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Results and analysis (22.62° supercell)] The lattice constants for the 104-atom 22.62° supercell are not reported, unlike the 36.87° case; please provide them for completeness.
  2. [General notation] The notation {C2T||C2zT} and similar double-bar symmetries is used throughout but is not explicitly defined; please define it when first introduced, or refer to the Supplemental Material for a precise group-theoretic definition.
  3. [Results and analysis (tb-AB 36.87°)] The statement "Due to the {C2||C4z} symmetry of tb-AB, only two of these Weyl points are independent" is ambiguous: it should clarify whether the two independent points are per spin channel or in total among the eight Weyl points.
  4. [Discussion and conclusion] The term "bipolarized Weyl semimetal" is introduced with references [37,39] but not defined; a brief definition in the text would improve accessibility for readers outside the authors' immediate subfield.
  5. [References] Reference [28] appears in the nonstandard form "I. Mazin (The PRX Editors)"; please format it consistently with the other references.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No material circularity: the central Weyl-semimetal prediction comes from first-principles calculations, not from fitted inputs or a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a first-principles prediction: DFT band structures, a Brillouin-zone-wide gap search identifying eight Weyl points at two commensurate twist angles, and surface Green's function edge-state calculations. None of these results is a fit to the target phase; the Weyl points are located numerically and then interpreted. The self-citations (refs 34, 37, 39, 58, 59) supply classification labels and a generic-position protection theorem for spin symmetries, but the authors do not use those citations as a substitute for calculation: they verify the crossing points explicitly. The monolayer benchmark is also checked against an external prior study (refs 34, 60). The statement that {C2T||C2zT} 'can also protect Weyl points at generic positions' is asserted without proof or citation, and the 'any commensurate twist angle' robustness claim is demonstrated for only two angles; these are correctness and completeness risks, not circular reductions. Similarly, the Discussion's 'four corners of the BZ' wording conflicts with the Abstract/Introduction's 'generic k points' wording, which is an internal inconsistency but not a case of deriving a result from its own definition. Overall the derivation chain is self-contained; the modest score reflects non-load-bearing self-citations used for naming and symmetry language.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rest on standard DFT, the assumed magnetic orderings, and the self-cited spin-symmetry protection theorem. The Hubbard U and the neglect of SOC are the main additional inputs that could alter the conclusions.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard U (Cr 3d) = not stated in main text
    The DFT+U calculation uses an on-site Coulomb U for Cr 3d electrons, which affects the band ordering and magnetic stability. The value is not reported in the main text and is a free parameter relative to the prediction.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Spin symmetry {C2T||C2zT} protects Weyl points at generic k points in 2D magnetic systems
    The paper relies on this result from the authors' prior work (ref 39) to identify the Weyl points as symmetry-protected. It is an unproved background result taken from a self-cited paper.
  • domain assumption SOC can be neglected for the band topology of the twisted bilayers
    The key electronic structures are computed without SOC. The authors justify this by small SOC-induced gaps (1-3 meV) in the untwisted AB stacking, but the twisted phases are not explicitly checked with SOC.
  • domain assumption The collinear magnetic configurations considered (FM, C-type, G-type, A-type AFM) exhaust the relevant magnetic ground states
    Only four collinear magnetic orders are tested. Non-collinear or more complex orders are not considered, so the magnetic ground state assignment could be incomplete.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twist-induced magnetic topological phase transition in stacked altermagnetic CrO." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TJIC2PXH

@misc{pith2026260801235,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twist-induced magnetic topological phase transition in stacked altermagnetic CrO},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TJIC2PXH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01235}
}
abstract

Interlayer twisting offers a geometric route to controlling electronic states, but whether it can simultaneously reconstruct magnetic symmetry and band topology remains unclear. Here, based on symmetry analysis and first-principles calculations, we show that commensurate twisting drives magnetic topological phase transitions in stacked bilayer CrO. In particular, it transforms an antiferromagnetic Dirac semimetal into either a $d$-wave altermagnetic bipolarized Weyl semimetal or an unconventional compensated magnetic Weyl semimetal. A key result is that the Weyl points in the $d$-wave altermagnetic phase lie at generic $k$ points in the Brillouin zone and are protected by the spin symmetry $\left\{ C_2 T||C_{2z} T\right\}$. This sharply contrasts with conventional two-dimensional Weyl semimetals, where Weyl points are typically protected by mirror or rotational symmetries and thus pinned to high-symmetry lines. We further show that commensurate twisting preserves the spin symmetry $\left\{ C_2 T||C_{2z} T\right\}$, making the Weyl phase a robust consequence of twisting rather than a fine-tuned feature of a specific angle. Our work establishes a symmetry-based route to engineering magnetic topological phases in twisted two-dimensional materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.01235 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure and ground-state magnetic con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Electronic band structure of AB stacking cal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Schematic illustration of the projections from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Crystal structure of the 104-atom moir´e supercell [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    School of Physics and Key Laboratory of Quantum State Construction and Manipulation (Ministry of Education), Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

    work page

  2. [2]

    College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060,China and

    work page

  3. [3]

    Twist-induced magnetic topological phase transition in stacked altermagnetic CrO

    Hefei National Laboratory, Hefei 230088, China (Dated: August 4, 2026) Interlayer twisting offers a geometric route to controlling electronic states, but whether it can simultaneously reconstruct magnetic symmetry and band topology remains unclear. Here, based on symmetry analysis and first-principles calculations, we show that commensurate twisting drive...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    A. A. Burkov, Topological semimetals, Nat. Mater.15, 1145 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    H. Weng, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Topological semimet- als predicted from first-principles calculations, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter28, 303001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015001 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    J. Zou, Z. He, and G. Xu, The study of magnetic topolog- ical semimetals by first principles calculations, npj Com- put. Mater.5, 96 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    B. Q. Lv, T. Qian, and H. Ding, Experimental perspec- tive on three-dimensional topological semimetals, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025002 (2021)

    2021

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    B. A. Bernevig, C. Felser, and H. Beidenkopf, Progress and prospects in magnetic topological materials, Nature 603, 41 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Liang, Q

    T. Liang, Q. Gibson, M. N. Ali, M. Liu, R. J. Cava, and N. P. Ong, Ultrahigh mobility and giant magnetoresis- tance in the Dirac semimetal Cd 3As2, Nat. Mater.14, 280 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    D. T. Son and B. Z. Spivak, Chiral anomaly and classical negative magnetoresistance of weyl metals, Phys. Rev. B 88, 104412 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    Huang, L

    X. Huang, L. Zhao, Y. Long, P. Wang, D. Chen, Z. Yang, H. Liang, M. Xue, H. Weng, Z. Fang, X. Dai, and G. Chen, Observation of the Chiral-Anomaly-Induced Negative Magnetoresistance in 3D Weyl Semimetal TaAs, Phys. Rev. X5, 031023 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Xiong, S

    J. Xiong, S. K. Kushwaha, T. Liang, J. W. Krizan, M. Hirschberger, W. Wang, R. J. Cava, and N. P. Ong, Evidence for the chiral anomaly in the Dirac semimetal Na3Bi, Science350, 413 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    J. Ge, D. Ma, Y. Liu, H. Wang, Y. Li, J. Luo, T. Luo, Y. Xing, J. Yan, D. Mandrus, H. Liu, X. C. Xie, and J. Wang, Unconventional hall effect induced by berry cur- vature, Natl. Sci. Rev.7, 1879 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    B. Q. Lv, H. M. Weng, B. B. Fu, X. P. Wang, H. Miao, J. Ma, P. Richard, X. C. Huang, L. X. Zhao, G. F. Chen, Z. Fang, X. Dai, T. Qian, and H. Ding, Experimental Dis- covery of Weyl Semimetal TaAs, Phys. Rev. X5, 031013 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    H. Weng, C. Fang, Z. Fang, B. A. Bernevig, and X. Dai, Weyl semimetal phase in noncentrosymmetric transition- 6 metal monophosphides, Phys. Rev. X5, 011029 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    S.-Y. Xu, I. Belopolski, N. Alidoust, M. Neupane, G. Bian, C. Zhang, R. Sankar, G. Chang, Z. Yuan, C.- C. Lee, S.-M. Huang, H. Zheng, J. Ma, D. S. Sanchez, B. Wang, A. Bansil, F. Chou, P. P. Shibayev, H. Lin, S. Jia, and M. Z. Hasan, Discovery of a weyl fermion semimetal and t...

    2015

  10. [18]

    Z. Wang, Y. Sun, X.-Q. Chen, C. Franchini, G. Xu, H. Weng, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Dirac semimetal and topo- logical phase transitions inA 3Bi (A= Na, K, Rb), Phys. Rev. B85, 195320 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    S. M. Young, S. Zaheer, J. C. Y. Teo, C. L. Kane, E. J. Mele, and A. M. Rappe, Dirac semimetal in three dimen- sions, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 140405 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    Bradlyn, J

    B. Bradlyn, J. Cano, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, R. J. Cava, and B. A. Bernevig, Beyond dirac and weyl fermions: Unconventional quasiparticles in con- ventional crystals, Science353, aaf5037 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Z. Zhu, G. W. Winkler, Q. Wu, J. Li, and A. A. Soluyanov, Triple point topological metals, Phys. Rev. X6, 031003 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    Kumar, M

    N. Kumar, M. Yao, J. Nayak, M. G. Vergniory, J. Ban- nies, Z. Wang, N. B. M. Schr¨ oter, V. N. Strocov, L. M¨ uchler, W. Shi, E. D. L. Rienks, J. L. Ma˜ nes, C. Shekhar, S. S. P. Parkin, J. Fink, G. H. Fecher, Y. Sun, B. A. Bernevig, and C. Felser, Signatures of Sixfold De- ge...

    2020

  15. [23]

    Y. Kim, B. J. Wieder, C. L. Kane, and A. M. Rappe, Dirac line nodes in inversion-symmetric crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 036806 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    H. Weng, Y. Liang, Q. Xu, R. Yu, Z. Fang, X. Dai, and Y. Kawazoe, Topological node-line semimetal in three- dimensional graphene networks, Phys. Rev. B92, 045108 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    C. Fang, H. Weng, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Topological nodal line semimetals, Chin. Phys. B25, 117106 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    R. Li, H. Ma, X. Cheng, S. Wang, D. Li, Z. Zhang, Y. Li, and X.-Q. Chen, Dirac node lines in pure alkali earth metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 096401 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Zantiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, and L.ˇSmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2108924118 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys

    I. Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040002 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in mag- netism and spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. , 1 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Jungwirth, J

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, R. M. Fernandes, Q. Liu, H. Watanabe, S. Murakami, S. Nakatsuji, and L.ˇSmejkal, Symmetry, microscopy and spectroscopy signatures of al- termagnetism, Nature649, 837 (2026)

    2026

  29. [37]

    Guo, Z.-X

    P.-J. Guo, Z.-X. Liu, and Z.-Y. Lu, Quantum anomalous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnetism, npj Comput. Mater.9, 70 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. F. Vender- bos, Mirror chern bands and weyl nodal loops in alter- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 096703 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    R. M. Fernandes, V. S. de Carvalho, T. Birol, and R. G. Pereira, Topological transition from nodal to nodeless zeeman splitting in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, 024404 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Tan, Z.-F

    C.-Y. Tan, Z.-F. Gao, H.-C. Yang, K. Liu, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Bipolarized weyl semimetals and quantum crystal valley hall effect in two-dimensional altermagnetic materials, Phys. Rev. B114, 055125 (2026)

    2026

  33. [41]

    Tan, Z.-F

    C.-Y. Tan, Z.-F. Gao, H.-C. Yang, Z.-X. Liu, K. Liu, P.- J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Crystal valley hall effect, Phys. Rev. B111, 094411 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Qu, X.-Y

    S. Qu, X.-Y. Hou, Z.-X. Liu, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Al- termagnetic weyl node-network metals protected by spin symmetry, Phys. Rev. B111, 195138 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Feng, C.-Y

    P. Feng, C.-Y. Tan, M. Gao, X.-W. Yan, Z.-X. Liu, P.-J. Guo, F. Ma, and Z.-Y. Lu, Type-II quantum spin hall insulator (2025), arXiv:2503.13397

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    C.-Y. Tan, P. Feng, Z.-F. Gao, F. Ma, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Stacking-induced type-II quantum spin Hall in- sulators with high spin Chern number in unconventional magnetism, Sci. Bull.71, 2196 (2026)

    2026

  37. [45]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, Y. Wang, J. Duan, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Quantized spin Hall conductivity in altermag- netic Fe2Te2O with mirror-spin coupling, Phys. Rev. B 113, L161115 (2026)

    2026

  38. [46]

    J. Nag, B. Das, S. Bhowal, Y. Nishioka, B. Bandyopad- hyay, S. Sarker, S. Kumar, K. Kuroda, V. Gopalan, A. Kimura, K. G. Suresh, and A. Alam, GdAlSi: An an- tiferromagnetic topological Weyl semimetal with nonrel- ativistic spin splitting, Phys. Rev. B110, 224436 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    C. Li, M. Hu, Z. Li, Y. Wang, W. Chen, B. Thiagarajan, M. Leandersson, C. Polley, T. Kim, H. Liu,et al., Topo- logical weyl altermagnetism in CrSb, Commun. Phys.8, 311 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, and E. Kaxiras, Electronic-structure methods for twisted moir´ e layers, Nat. Rev. Mater.5, 748 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yazdani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moir´ e materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 201 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    L. Du, T. Hasan, A. Castellanos-Gomez, G.-B. Liu, Y. Yao, C. N. Lau, and Z. Sun, Engineering symmetry breaking in 2d layered materials, Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 193 (2021). 7

    2021

  43. [51]

    D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, L. Xian, A. Georges, A. J. Millis, J. Hone, C. R. Dean, D. Basov, A. N. Pasupathy, and A. Rubio, Moir´ e heterostructures as a condensed- matter quantum simulator, Nat. Phys.17, 155 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    K. F. Mak and J. Shan, Semiconductor moir´ e materials, Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 686 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    S. Carr, D. Massatt, S. Fang, P. Cazeaux, M. Luskin, and E. Kaxiras, Twistronics: Manipulating the electronic properties of two-dimensional layered structures through their twist angle, Phys. Rev. B95, 075420 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Y. Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Twisted magnetic van der waals bilayers: An ideal platform for altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206702 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    R. He, D. Wang, N. Luo, J. Zeng, K.-Q. Chen, and L.- M. Tang, Nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling in an- tiferromagnetic twisted bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 046401 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Sheoran and S

    S. Sheoran and S. Bhattacharya, Nonrelativistic spin splittings and altermagnetism in twisted bilayers of cen- trosymmetric antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Mater.8, L051401 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Zeng and Y.-J

    S. Zeng and Y.-J. Zhao, Bilayer stackingA-type al- termagnet: A general approach to generating two- dimensional altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B110, 174410 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    T. Li, S. Jiang, B. Shen, Y. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Tao, T. De- vakul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu,et al., Quan- tum anomalous hall effect from intertwined moir´ e bands, Nature600, 641 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn¨ uppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evidence of fractional Chern insulator in moir´ e MoTe2, Nature622, 69 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    D. Tian, S. Tao, Y. Wang, P. Cheng, Y. Zhang, K. Wu, Z. Zhang, S. A. Yang, B. Feng, Y. Lu,et al., Real-space observation of a time-reversal invariant topological state in twisted bilayer inse, Nat. Commun.16, 9453 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    Guo, H.-C

    P.-J. Guo, H.-C. Yang, X.-Y. Hou, Z.-F. Gao, W. Ji, and Z.-Y. Lu, Luttinger-compensated bipolarized mag- netic semiconductor, Phys. Rev. B112, L180405 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    Hou, Z.-F

    X.-Y. Hou, Z.-F. Gao, H.-C. Yang, P.-J. Guo, and Z.- Y. Lu, Unconventional Compensated Magnetic Material LaMn2SbO6, Chin. Phys. Lett.42, 070712 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    X. Chen, D. Wang, L. Li, and B. Sanyal, Giant spin- splitting and tunable spin-momentum locked transport in room temperature collinear antiferromagnetic semimetal- lic CrO monolayer, Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 022402 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    See supplemental material at http://link.aps.org/xxx, which includes a detailed description of computational methods as well as supplemental figures

  57. [65]

    J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos, N. M. R. Peres, and A. H. Castro Neto, Graphene bilayer with a twist: Electronic structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 256802 (2007)

    2007

  58. [66]

    Moon and M

    P. Moon and M. Koshino, Energy spectrum and quantum hall effect in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B85, 195458 (2012)

    2012

  59. [67]

    D. S. Koda, F. Bechstedt, M. Marques, and L. K. Teles, Coincidence lattices of 2D crystals: Heterostructure pre- dictions and applications, J. Phys. Chem. C.120, 10895 (2016)

    2016

  60. [68]

    X.-D. Chen, W. Xin, W.-S. Jiang, Z.-B. Liu, Y. Chen, and J.-G. Tian, High-precision twist-controlled bilayer and trilayer graphene, Adv. Mater.28, 2563 (2016)

    2016

  61. [69]

    Kapfer, B

    M. Kapfer, B. S. Jessen, M. E. Eisele, M. Fu, D. R. Danielsen, T. P. Darlington, S. L. Moore, N. R. Finney, A. Marchese, V. Hsieh, P. Majchrzak, Z. Jiang, D. Biswas, P. Dudin, J. Avila, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Ulstrup, P. Bøggild, P. J. Schuck, D. N. Basov, J. Hone, and ...

    2023

  62. [70]

    H. Tang, Y. Wang, X. Ni, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, S. Fan, E. Mazur, A. Yacoby, and Y. Cao, On-chip multi-degree-of-freedom control of two- dimensional materials, Nature632, 1038 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    Z. He, P. K. Jharapla, N. Leconte, J. Jung, and G. Khalsa, Proposal for optical control of the moir´ e twist angle, Phys. Rev. B113, 195411 (2026)

    2026

  64. [72]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations in- cluding exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev.140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  65. [73]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  66. [74]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  67. [75]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  68. [76]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  69. [77]

    Klimeˇ s, D

    J. Klimeˇ s, D. R. Bowler, and A. Michaelides, Van der waals density functionals applied to solids, Phys. Rev. B 83, 195131 (2011)

    2011

  70. [78]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- tra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An lsda+u study, Phys. Rev. B57, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  71. [79]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun.178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  72. [80]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Wanniertools: An open-source software pack- age for novel topological materials, Comput. Phys. Com- mun.224, 405 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.