Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 60 references

Scattering theory of higher order topological phases

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A symmetric annular scattering geometry with a threaded flux turns the flux dependence of the reflection matrix into a universal invariant for intrinsic higher-order topological phases.

desk verdict Solid new scattering construction for intrinsic HOTIs, honestly verified on examples, but the abstract's universality claim outruns a proof and should be tempered. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15333 v2 pith:TJL7CHM2 submitted 2024-12-19 cond-mat.mes-hall

R. Johanna Zijderveld , Isidora Araya Day , Anton R. Akhmerov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords higher-ordertopologicalinsulatorsscatteringtheoryreflectionmatrixspectralflowfluxlinebulk-edgecorrespondenceinvariantdisorder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops a scattering theory for intrinsic higher-order topological insulators and superconductors—phases whose boundary states are protected by the spatial symmetries of a finite sample. The authors show that standard scattering invariants fail for these phases because the geometry either breaks the protecting symmetry or only probes surface physics. Their fix is an annulus or cylinder geometry with leads on both the inner and outer boundary and a magnetic flux through the hole. The flux dependence of the reflection matrix then encodes the bulk higher-order index, changing only when the bulk gap closes. This gives a transport-based route to bulk–boundary correspondence that also works with disorder and in network models that lack a bulk Hamiltonian.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the reflection matrix $r(\phi, k_{d-2})$ of an annulus in two dimensions or a cylinder in three dimensions, with leads attached symmetrically to both the inner and outer boundaries and a flux $\phi$ threaded through the hole. The flux acts as an extra momentum parameter, completing a dimensional reduction that maps the $d$-dimensional bulk onto a $(d-1)$-dimensional effective Hamiltonian $H_{\mathrm{eff}}(\phi, k_{d-2})$ constructed from $r$ according to a symmetry-dependent prescription (Hermitian when the bulk has chiral symmetry, off-diagonal otherwise). The crucial structural insight is that spatial symmetries of the bulk become nonsymmorphic symmetries of $H_{\mathrm{eff}}$: a rotation becomes a translation combined with a phase, and inversion becomes a glide. The invariants are then evaluated on $H_{\mathrm{eff}}$—for the BBH model as the parity of crossings of $\det h(\phi)$ through the real axis, and for the magnetic and inversion-symmetric examples as Pfaffians at high-symmetry points—so that a zero eigenvalue of $r$ is exactly a bulk-gap-closing transition.

What would settle it

Compute the scattering invariant of an intrinsic second-order HOTI in an annulus and check whether $\det h(\phi)$ (or the Pfaffian) winds while the reflection matrix has no zero eigenvalue in the topological phase, or whether it changes when only the surface gap closes; a single such example, or a demonstration that the flux-phase convention $V^n_{C_n} = C^n(0) e^{i\phi}$ depends on gauge, would falsify the claim that the reflection matrix captures the bulk index.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the flux dependence of the reflection matrix of a symmetric annular scattering geometry is a universal probe of intrinsic higher-order topology. Concretely, the paper demonstrates that the winding of $\det h(\phi)$, or equivalently Pfaffian-type expressions built from the reflection matrix, equals the bulk higher-order topological index in a series of examples: the two-dimensional BBH model, a two-dimensional $C_4\mathcal{T}$-symmetric network model, a three-dimensional $C_4\mathcal{T}$-symmetric higher-order topological insulator, and a three-dimensional inversion-symmetric axion insulator. The invariant is defined through a dimensionally reduced effective Hamiltonian $H_{\mathrm{eff}}(\phi, k_{d-2})$ that is gapped whenever the reflection matrix has no zero eigenvalue, so it can only change when the bulk gap closes. Accompanying this, the paper identifies the spectral flow of zero modes as a function of the flux threaded through the annulus as a signature of higher-order topology, present only in the topological phase. The scattering approach thereby provides an alternative proof route for bulk–edge correspondence in intrinsic higher-order topological phases, including disordered ones.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that for every intrinsic second-order higher-order topological phase one can choose a symmetric annulus or cylinder geometry in which the two leads are separated by the bulk and the threaded flux acts as a faithful momentum parameter, with a gauge-independent flux-phase convention for the symmetry operators; if a phase cannot be probed this way, the reflection-matrix invariant would not see the bulk topology.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The intrinsic higher-order index can be computed from reflection data alone, without diagonalizing the full spectrum.
  • The invariant is robust to disorder that preserves the global symmetry, so it can certify higher-order topological phases in disordered or amorphous samples.
  • The approach resolves the ambiguous topological classification of network models, where no bulk Hamiltonian exists.
  • The flux-response (spectral flow) signature connects higher-order topology to Laughlin-type flux arguments, giving a local, experimentally relevant probe.
  • The method provides an alternative proof of bulk–edge correspondence for second-order topological insulators and superconductors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • (Extension) The conjecture that third-order HOTIs require two holes and two fluxes suggests a natural generalization: a $d$-dimensional $N$-th order phase should be probed by an $N$-fold annular geometry with $N$ independent fluxes, mapping to a $d-1$-dimensional effective Hamiltonian.
  • (Extension) Because the invariant depends only on the reflection matrix, it could be measured in metamaterial realizations where reflection-phase measurements are routine, turning the flux-winding into an observable.
  • (Extension) The equivalence between flux response and higher-order topology implies that flux lines act as local topological defects carrying the bulk index, which may yield quantized transport or pumping signatures in driven versions of these systems.
  • (Extension) The dimensional-reduction map from rotation to translation suggests a unified classification where point-group-protected higher-order invariants are indexed by glide-symmetric one-dimensional invariants, possibly extending to magnetic space groups.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a scattering-theoretic framework for probing intrinsic higher-order topological insulators and superconductors (HOTIs) with spatial symmetries. The central construction is an annulus or cylindrical scattering geometry: leads are attached to the inner and outer boundaries, a magnetic flux φ is threaded through the center, and the reflection matrix r(φ,k) is computed at zero energy. Symmetry constraints on r are derived from the spatial symmetries of the HOTI, and effective Hamiltonians Heff(φ,k) are built from r. Topological invariants are then assigned to Heff, taking the form of winding numbers or Pfaffian-based Z2 expressions (Eqs. 14, 16, 19, and 22). The approach is applied to four model systems: the Benalcázar–Bernevig–Hughes (BBH) model, a two-dimensional C4T-symmetric network model, a three-dimensional C4T-symmetric HOTI, and a three-dimensional inversion-symmetric axion insulator. In each case the invariant is numerically found to change at the independently known bulk phase transition, and for the BBH model the invariant remains well-defined in the presence of globally C4-symmetric disorder.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a valuable contribution: it would provide a real-space, disorder-compatible probe of intrinsic HOTI topology, connect higher-order topology to flux response, and offer a new route toward bulk–edge correspondence in these phases. The paper has clear strengths: the symmetry-constraint derivation in Sec. 3 and App. B is systematic; the numerical verification covers four distinct models with different symmetry groups; the code is deposited on Zenodo (Ref. [54]); and the invariant is shown to work for a network model, where a bulk Hamiltonian is not available. However, the paper does not prove that the flux-winding of the reflection matrix equals the bulk higher-order topological index. The authors are candid about this in Secs. 4.1 and 5, but the abstract and conclusion make stronger claims than the evidence supports. The universality for all second-order HOTIs is asserted on the basis of examples and general arguments, not a proof, and the spectral-flow identification is justified by a single numerical example (Fig. 4).

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (14); Sec. 5] The central claim that the flux-winding of the reflection matrix equals the bulk higher-order topological index is not proven. In Sec. 4.1 the authors state that the topology of the effective one-dimensional system has 'not been studied before' and that they 'proceed to construct the invariant,' making Eq. (14) a candidate invariant rather than a derived one. The evidence that Q changes only at the bulk transition is numerical agreement at the known transition point (λ=γ for the BBH model) and at the corresponding transitions in the other examples. The conclusion (Sec. 5) itself says the examples 'indicate' the approach applies to all second-order HOTIs. As written, the abstract's 'We demonstrate' and the final sentence that 'all second order HOTIs have protected defect modes appearing at flux lines' exceed what is established. The authors should either supply a proof for at least one nontrivial case (e.g., relating Eq. (14) to the nested Wilson loop or corner charge of the BBH model) or reformulate the universality claim explicitly as a conjecture supported by numerical evidence.
  2. [Sec. 3; Fig. 4] The correspondence between the threaded flux φ and a momentum parameter of Heff is an assumption rather than a derived statement. Section 3 asserts that C_n^n(φ)=C_n^n(0)e^{iφ} and that this 'invites interpreting φ as a momentum of Heff,' but no argument rules out a second-order HOTI whose invariant Q stays constant across a bulk transition, or a trivial model whose Q changes in the absence of a bulk transition. The only evidence for the spectral-flow identification is the numerical example in Fig. 4 for the BBH model in the topological phase. This correspondence is load-bearing: it is the step that connects the scattering setup to the bulk index. A precise statement of the conditions under which the flux acts as a faithful momentum parameter, with at least a heuristic derivation or additional nontrivial examples showing that the correspondence fails when those conditions are violated, is needed.
  3. [Sec. 5; Defect-mode claim] The concluding inference that all second-order HOTIs have protected defect modes at flux lines overreaches the presented evidence. The argument uses geometry-independence of Q, but geometry-independence alone does not imply that the flux-line defect modes are protected by the bulk topology unless Q has been shown to equal the bulk index. The paper also concedes that third-order HOTIs 'do not seem to fit into our framework,' yet the abstract and conclusion do not adequately convey this limitation. The defect-mode conclusion should be presented as a consequence of the (conjectured) equality between the scattering invariant and the bulk invariant, rather than as a separate established result.
  4. [Sec. 4.3, Fig. 8; Eq. (22)] Figure 8(d) shows an extended range of µ over which the sign of the invariant changes, which the text attributes to the Fermi surface. This needs clarification: if the bulk is gapless at zero energy in that range, the reflection matrix is not unitary and the invariant defined in Eq. (22) may not be a well-defined topological index. The authors should state explicitly whether Q remains quantized in the gray region, whether the reflection gap ∆ in Fig. 8(c) closes there, and how a 'change of sign' is defined when the invariant may not be quantized. Without this clarification, the axion-insulator example does not unambiguously demonstrate that the scattering invariant detects the phase transition.
  5. [App. D; Eqs. (14), (19), (22)] The numerical smooth-gauge construction in App. D does not establish that the invariants are independent of the gauge choices made in the eigenvector and SVD updates. The integrals in Eqs. (14), (19), and (22) involve log det of the reflection matrix, and a non-smooth or branch-choosing gauge could in principle change the parity or the winding. The authors should either prove gauge invariance analytically or demonstrate numerically that different gauge seeds and different step sizes δφ give the same value of Q.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 1] In the paragraph after Fig. 1, 'surface gap glosing' should be 'surface gap closing.'
  2. [App. B.2] The symbol K for complex conjugation is used without definition; please define it or avoid it by writing the conjugation explicitly.
  3. [Eq. (22)] Equation (22) is difficult to parse because of the nested fractions and exponentials; please present the invariant with an explicit definition of the branches of the logarithms and square roots used in the determinants.
  4. [Fig. 4 caption] The phrase 'the crossing at ϕ=π is fine-tuned' is unclear; please specify which parameter is tuned, to what value, and why the crossing is not generic.
  5. [Sec. 5] The phrase 'higher order HOTIs' is redundant; consider using 'third-order HOTIs' or 'HOTIs of order three.'
  6. [Ref. [40]] The network-models package is cited as 'to be published'; if a stable version or DOI is available, please cite it instead.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the scattering invariant is computed from the reflection matrix independently of the phase-transition benchmarks, and the self-citations provide prior, externally established machinery rather than a load-bearing circular chain.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain does not reduce its central claim to its inputs by construction. The scattering invariant Q in each example is evaluated from the reflection matrix r(phi) alone and is then compared with known bulk phase transitions, such as lambda = gamma for the BBH model, so the transition point is an external benchmark rather than a fitted parameter. The only place where the paper constructs rather than imports an invariant is Sec. 4.1, where it explicitly says: 'to the best of our knowledge, the topology of one-dimensional systems combining fractional translations and sublattice symmetries has not been studied before. Therefore, we proceed to construct the invariant.' This is an honest admission of an ansatz, not a circular reduction: Eq. (14) is a standard Z2 winding-type expression derived from the stated symmetry constraints det h(phi + 2pi) = det h*(phi), and its phase-transition location is then checked numerically rather than enforced. The paper does not prove that this flux-winding equals the bulk higher-order topological index in general; the conclusion concedes the evidence is exemplary ('Our examples, together with general arguments, indicate that our approach applies to all second order HOTIs') and that third-order HOTIs 'do not seem to fit into our framework.' That is a generality or correctness gap, not circularity. Self-citations (Refs [19,20,22,33,40,42,50,54]) supply scattering machinery, computational tools, and a prior delocalization argument that are published external results; no load-bearing uniqueness theorem from the same authors is invoked to forbid alternative constructions. Hence the central derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks, and no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four domain assumptions or ad hoc constructions and no fitted free parameters. The paper does not introduce new physical entities, but it does introduce a nonstandard bookkeeping device (the flux as momentum) that is not derived from first principles.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The standard scattering-theory result (Ref. [20]) that the reflection matrix of a lead attached to a topological bulk defines a lower-dimensional effective Hamiltonian Heff (Eq. 3) with the same topology as the bulk.
    This is the foundation of the dimensional reduction used throughout; if it failed for the annular geometry, the invariants would not probe bulk topology. Invoked in Sec. 3, Eq. (3).
  • ad hoc to paper Threading a flux phi through the annulus and treating it as a momentum parameter in Heff, with rotation symmetries acquiring a phase V^n_Cn = C^n(0) exp(i phi), faithfully maps the spatial symmetry group of the HOTI to the symmetry group of the effective Hamiltonian.
    This is the key construction enabling the intrinsic invariant; the flux dependence is chosen so that symmetry operators exponentiate to the flux phase, but this is not derived from a microscopic theory. Introduced in Sec. 3 around Eq. (6) and the paragraph 'We therefore introduce a flux phi...'.
  • domain assumption For every intrinsic second-order HOTI there exists a symmetric annulus/cylinder geometry with inner and outer leads separated by the bulk, such that zeros of the reflection matrix occur only when the bulk gap closes.
    The paper states this as a requirement for the method (Sec. 3) and notes that third-order HOTIs cannot be treated this way (Sec. 5). If a second-order HOTI only hosts protected modes on one surface, the construction is inapplicable.
  • ad hoc to paper The spectral flow of a flux line is a general signature of higher order topology.
    Identified from a numerical example in Fig. 4 and used as a guiding principle; not proven for all HOTIs. Stated in Sec. 3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scattering theory of higher order topological phases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TJL7CHM2

@misc{pith2026241215333,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scattering theory of higher order topological phases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TJL7CHM2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15333}
}
read the original abstract

The surface states of intrinsic higher order topological phases are protected by the spatial symmetries of a finite sample. This property makes the existing scattering theory of topological invariants inapplicable because the scattering geometry is either incompatible with the symmetry or does not probe the bulk topology. We resolve this obstacle by using a symmetric scattering geometry that probes transport from the inside to the outside of the sample. We demonstrate that the intrinsic higher order topology is captured by the flux dependence of the reflection matrix. Our finding follows from identifying the spectral flow of a flux line as a signature of higher order topology. We show how this scattering approach applies to several examples of higher order topological insulators and superconductors. Our theory provides an alternative approach for proving bulk--edge correspondence in intrinsic higher order topological phases, especially in presence of disorder.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15333 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Extrinsic and intrinsic higher order phases in the BBH model. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Scattering geometries that probe the topology of a two-dimensional in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Scattering geometries that probe the existence of zero-energy surface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Energy spectrum of a topological BBH model in an annulus geometry as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Two scattering geometries of the BBH model and their intrinsic invari [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Two-dimensional C4T + P-symmetric network model and its corre￾sponding phase diagram. (a) Annulus geometry (blue) with leads (purple) at￾tached to the inside and outside of the disk. The scattering unit cell has two sites and a flux ϕ is threaded through its center. (b…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Three-dimensional C4T -symmetric HOTI. (a) Infinite cylindrical scat￾tering geometry with a flux ϕ threaded through the center. The leads (purple) are attached to the inside and outside of the cylinder, both are surfaces with four edge modes (red). (b) Gap of the refle…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A three-dimensional inversion-symmetric second-order HOTI, the axion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [54]

    R. J. Zijderveld, I. Araya Day and A. R. Akhmerov, Scattering theory of higher order topological phases, doi:10.5281/zenodo.14503341 (2024). 20 SciPost Physics Submission A Scattering equation The scattering formalism describes the transport of electrons through a scattering region connected to leads. The scattering region is a finite system of sites and ...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.14503341 2024

  2. [1]

    Schindler, A

    F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, S. S. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig and T. Neupert, Higher-order topological insulators, Science Advances 4(6), eaat0346 (2018), doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat0346

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat0346 2018

  3. [2]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig and T. L. Hughes, Electric multipole moments, topological multipole moment pumping, and chiral hinge states in crystalline insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B 96, 245115 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.245115

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.245115 2017

  4. [3]

    Geier, L

    M. Geier, L. Trifunovic, M. Hoskam and P. W. Brouwer, Second-order topological insulators and superconductors with an order-two crystalline symmetry , Phys. Rev. B 97, 205135 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.205135

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.205135 2018

  5. [4]

    Trifunovic and P

    L. Trifunovic and P. W. Brouwer, Higher-order bulk-boundary correspon- dence for topological crystalline phases , Phys. Rev. X 9, 011012 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.011012

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.011012 2019

  6. [5]

    Trifunovic and P

    L. Trifunovic and P. W. Brouwer, Higher-order topological band structures, Physica Status Solidi (b) 258(1), 2000090 (2021), doi:10.1002/pssb.202000090

    doi:10.1002/pssb.202000090 2021

  7. [6]

    Z.-D. Song, B. Lian, R. Queiroz, R. Ilan, B. A. Bernevig and A. Stern, Delocalization transition of a disordered axion insulator , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 016602 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.016602

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.016602 2021

  8. [7]

    Y.-B. Yang, K. Li, L.-M. Duan and Y. Xu, Higher-order topological Anderson insu- lators, Phys. Rev. B 103, 085408 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.085408

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.085408 2021

Show all 60 references
  1. [8]

    A. Y. Chaou, M. Moreno-Gonzalez, A. Altland and P. W. Brouwer, Disordered topological crystalline phases , doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.01883 (2024), 2412.01883

    2024 doi arXiv

  2. [9]

    Y. Shen, Z. Li, Q. Niu and Z. Qiao, Disorder-induced phase transitions in three- dimensional chiral second-order topological insulator , Phys. Rev. B 109, 035303 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.035303

    2024 doi

  3. [10]

    C.-A. Li, B. Fu, Z.-A. Hu, J. Li and S.-Q. Shen, Topological phase transitions in disordered electric quadrupole insulators , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 166801 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.166801. 17 SciPost Physics Submission

    2020 doi

  4. [11]

    Z.-D. Song, L. Elcoro and B. A. Bernevig, Twisted bulk-boundary correspondence of fragile topology, Science 367(6479), 794 (2020), doi:10.1126/science.aaz7659

    2020 doi

  5. [12]

    Roy and V

    B. Roy and V. Juriˇ ci´ c,Dislocation as a bulk probe of higher-order topological insula- tors, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033107 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033107

    2021 doi

  6. [13]

    Z.-K. Lin, Y. Wu, B. Jiang, Y. Liu, S.-Q. Wu, F. Li and J.-H. Jiang, Topological wannier cycles induced by sub-unit-cell artificial gauge flux in a sonic crystal , Nature Materials 21(4), 430 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41563-022-01200-w

    2022 doi

  7. [14]

    Schindler, S

    F. Schindler, S. S. Tsirkin, T. Neupert, B. Andrei Bernevig and B. J. Wieder, Topo- logical zero-dimensional defect and flux states in three-dimensional insulators, Nature communications 13(1), 5791 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33471-x

    2022 doi

  8. [15]

    Y. You, T. Devakul, F. J. Burnell and T. Neupert, Higher-order symmetry-protected topological states for interacting bosons and fermions, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235102 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.235102

    2018 doi

  9. [16]

    Y. You, J. Bibo and F. Pollmann, Higher-order entanglement and many-body in- variants for higher-order topological phases , Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033192 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033192

    2020 doi

  10. [17]

    Takahashi, Y

    R. Takahashi, Y. Tanaka and S. Murakami, Bulk-edge and bulk-hinge corre- spondence in inversion-symmetric insulators , Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013300 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013300

    2020 doi

  11. [18]

    Geier, I

    M. Geier, I. C. Fulga and A. Lau, Bulk-boundary-defect correspondence at disclina- tions in rotation-symmetric topological insulators and superconductors, SciPost Phys. 10, 092 (2021), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.4.092

    2021 doi

  12. [19]

    I. C. Fulga, F. Hassler, A. R. Akhmerov and C. W. J. Beenakker, Scattering formula for the topological quantum number of a disordered multimode wire , Phys. Rev. B 83, 155429 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.83.155429

    2011 doi

  13. [20]

    I. C. Fulga, F. Hassler and A. R. Akhmerov, Scattering theory of topo- logical insulators and superconductors , Phys. Rev. B 85, 165409 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.165409

    2012 doi

  14. [21]

    Zhang, P

    Z. Zhang, P. Delplace and R. Fleury, Anomalous topological waves in strongly amorphous scattering networks , Science Advances 9(12), eadg3186 (2023), doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg3186

    2023 doi

  15. [22]

    Waintal, M

    X. Waintal, M. Wimmer, A. Akhmerov, C. Groth, B. K. Nikolic, M. Is- tas, T. ¨O. Rosdahl and D. Varjas, Computational quantum transport , doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.16257 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  16. [23]

    Langbehn, Y

    J. Langbehn, Y. Peng, L. Trifunovic, F. von Oppen and P. W. Brouwer, Reflection- symmetric second-order topological insulators and superconductors , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 246401 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.246401

    2017 doi

  17. [24]

    Trifunovic and P

    L. Trifunovic and P. Brouwer, Bott periodicity for the topological classification of gapped states of matter with reflection symmetry , Phys. Rev. B 96, 195109 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.195109

    2017 doi

  18. [25]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig and T. L. Hughes, Quantized electric multipole insulators, Science 357(6346), 61 (2017), doi:10.1126/science.aah6442. 18 SciPost Physics Submission

    2017 doi

  19. [26]

    Lin and C

    L. Lin and C. Lee, Probing chiral-symmetric higher-order topological insulators with multipole winding number, Commun Phys 7 (2024), doi:10.1038/s42005-024-01884-3

    2024 doi

  20. [27]

    Wang and X

    H. Wang and X. Zhu, Higher-order topological superconductors characterized by fermi level crossings, Phys. Rev. B 108, 125426 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.125426

    2023 doi

  21. [28]

    Cerjan, T

    A. Cerjan, T. A. Loring and H. Schulz-Baldes, Local markers for crystalline topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 073803 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.073803

    2024 doi

  22. [29]

    Jezequel and P

    L. Jezequel and P. Delplace, Mode-shell correspondence, a unifying phase space theory in topological physics - Part I: Chiral number of zero-modes , SciPost Phys. 17, 060 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.2.060

    2024 doi

  23. [30]

    Li, X.-J

    J.-Z. Li, X.-J. Luo, F. Wu and M. Xiao, Exact universal characterization of chiral- symmetric higher-order topological phases , doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.19757 (2024), 2404.19757

    2024 doi

  24. [31]

    Y. Peng, Y. Bao and F. von Oppen, Boundary green functions of topo- logical insulators and superconductors , Phys. Rev. B 95, 235143 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.235143

    2017 doi

  25. [32]

    C. S. Weber, M. Pletyukhov, Z. Hou, D. M. Kennes, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss and H. Schoeller, Second-order topology and supersymmetry in two-dimensional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 107, 235402 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.235402

    2023 doi

  26. [33]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov and X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New J. Phys. 16(6), 063065 (2014), doi:10.1088/1367- 2630/16/6/063065

    2014 doi

  27. [34]

    J. T. Chalker and P. D. Coddington, Percolation, quantum tunnelling and the in- teger hall effect , Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 21(14), 2665 (1988), doi:10.1088/0022-3719/21/14/008

    1988 doi

  28. [35]

    Kramer, T

    B. Kramer, T. Ohtsuki and S. Kettemann, Random network models and quan- tum phase transitions in two dimensions , Physics Reports 417(5), 211 (2005), doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.07.001

    2005 doi

  29. [36]

    H. Liu, S. Franca, A. G. Moghaddam, F. Hassler and I. C. Fulga, Network model for higher-order topological phases , Phys. Rev. B 103, 115428 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.115428

    2021 doi

  30. [37]

    W. Zhu, Y. D. Chong and J. Gong, Symmetry analysis of anomalous floquet topolog- ical phases, Phys. Rev. B 104, L020302 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.L020302

    2021 doi

  31. [38]

    Z.-H. Liu, O. Entin-Wohlman, A. Aharony, J. Q. You and H. Q. Xu, Scattering de- scription of edge states in aharonov-bohm triangle chains , Phys. Rev. B 109, L081408 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L081408

    2024 doi

  32. [39]

    H. Liu, A. G. Moghaddam, D. Varjas and I. C. Fulga, Network model for magnetic higher-order topological phases , Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043167 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043167

    2024 doi

  33. [40]

    Zijderveld et al., https://gitlab.kwant-project.org/qt/network-models, To be published (2024)

    J. Zijderveld et al., https://gitlab.kwant-project.org/qt/network-models, To be published (2024). 19 SciPost Physics Submission

    2024

  34. [41]

    Li and K

    H. Li and K. Sun, Pfaffian formalism for higher-order topological insulators , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 036401 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.036401

    2020 doi

  35. [42]

    Varjas, T

    D. Varjas, T. ¨O. Rosdahl and A. R. Akhmerov, Qsymm: Algorithmic symmetry finding and symmetric hamiltonian generation , New J. Phys. 20(9), 093026 (2018), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aadf67

    2018 doi

  36. [43]

    X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes and S.-C. Zhang, Topological invariants for the fermi sur- face of a time-reversal-invariant superconductor , Phys. Rev. B 81, 134508 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.134508

    2010 doi

  37. [44]

    R. S. K. Mong, A. M. Essin and J. E. Moore, Antiferromagnetic topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 81, 245209 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.245209

    2010 doi

  38. [45]

    Zhang, C

    F. Zhang, C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Surface state magnetization and chi- ral edge states on topological insulators , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 046404 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.046404

    2013 doi

  39. [46]

    Varnava and D

    N. Varnava and D. Vanderbilt, Surfaces of axion insulators , Phys. Rev. B 98, 245117 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.245117

    2018 doi

  40. [47]

    B. J. Wieder and B. A. Bernevig, The axion insulator as a pump of fragile topology , doi:10.48550/arXiv.1810.02373 (2018), 1810.02373

    2018 doi arXiv

  41. [48]

    Khalaf, Higher-order topological insulators and superconductors protected by inver- sion symmetry , Phys

    E. Khalaf, Higher-order topological insulators and superconductors protected by inver- sion symmetry , Phys. Rev. B 97, 205136 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.205136

    2018 doi

  42. [49]

    Shiozaki, M

    K. Shiozaki, M. Sato and K. Gomi, Topological crystalline materials: General for- mulation, module structure, and wallpaper groups , Phys. Rev. B 95, 235425 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.235425

    2017 doi

  43. [50]

    I. C. Fulga, B. van Heck, J. M. Edge and A. R. Akhmerov, Statistical topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 89, 155424 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.89.155424

    2014 doi

  44. [51]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Topology, delocalization via average symmetry and the symplectic anderson transition , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 246605 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.246605

    2012 doi

  45. [52]

    P. W. Brouwer, Scattering approach to parametric pumping, Phys. Rev. B 58, R10135 (1998), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.58.R10135

    1998 doi

  46. [53]

    Meidan, T

    D. Meidan, T. Micklitz and P. W. Brouwer, Topological classification of adiabatic processes, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195410 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.195410

    2011 doi

  47. [55]

    Compute the overlap matrix O(ϕ) = U † V,+(ϕ)UV,+(ϕ + δϕ)

  48. [56]

    Compute the singular value decomposition O(ϕ) = U (ϕ)S(ϕ)V †(ϕ)

  49. [57]

    Compute the gauge transformation matrix G(ϕ) = U (ϕ)V (ϕ)

  50. [58]

    Update the eigenvectors UV,±(ϕ + δϕ) → UV,±(ϕ + δϕ)G†(ϕ)

  51. [59]

    Repeat for the next value of ϕ, until ϕ = 2π

  52. [60]

    The last step ensures that the gauge is also 2 π-periodic

    Compute the overlap matrix O(2π) and spread the gauge transformation uniformly over all the eigenvectors. The last step ensures that the gauge is also 2 π-periodic. Additionally, if a symmetry that maps ϕ to −ϕ is present, e.g. time-reversal, we further constrain the gauge by ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.