Numerical modeling for trapped-ion thermometry using dark resonances

Cecilia Cormick; Christian Tom\'as Schmiegelow; Muriel Bonetto; Nicol\'as Adri\'an Nu\~nez Barreto

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 34 references

Numerical modeling for trapped-ion thermometry using dark resonances

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Calibrated dephasing fits turn dark-resonance spectra into reliable trapped-ion thermometers.

desk verdict A careful, internally consistent comparison of four CPT thermometry simulation methods with a useful calibration recipe for the fast dephasing model, though the benchmark remains unvalidated against experiment. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04459 v3 pith:TJQUXXHG submitted 2025-05-07 physics.atom-ph quant-ph

Muriel Bonetto , Nicolás Adrián Nuñez Barreto , Christian Tomás Schmiegelow , Cecilia Cormick This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.atom-phquant-ph

keywords trapped-ionthermometrydarkresonancescoherentpopulationtrappingeffectivedephasingopticalBlochequationsFloquetsidebandscalcium-40ionDopplerbroadening

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether dark-resonance spectra of trapped ions, which are sharp fluorescence dips used to read out ion temperature, can be simulated quickly enough for routine fits without losing accuracy. It compares four ways of including thermal motion in the spectrum and identifies one cheap method, the effective dephasing approximation, that can give temperature estimates off by up to an order of magnitude in the few-milliKelvin range. The authors claim that this bias is systematic and can be removed by calibration: fit the cheap model to spectra computed with a slower, more exact simulation, build a calibration curve, and the fast method becomes accurate. If right, dark-resonance thermometry becomes practical for local, ion-by-ion temperature measurements in trapped-ion chains, which is what heat-transport and quantum-thermodynamics experiments need.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective dephasing approximation: thermal motion is represented not by a time-dependent Doppler shift but by an added dephasing rate $\Gamma_D \propto |\vec{k}_0-\vec{k}_2| \sqrt{k_B T/m}$ distributed over the two laser linewidths. The mechanism that makes the method trustworthy is calibration: for each set of Rabi frequencies, one first computes reference spectra with the oscillatory-shift simulation or the truncated Floquet 'sidebands' expansion, fits those reference spectra with the dephasing model, and reads off a monotonic map between fitted and true temperature. The sidebands approximation itself, a Floquet expansion truncated at $n_{\mathrm{max}} \sim kA$, is the cheaper benchmark that reproduces the oscillatory-shift spectra almost exactly in one-dimensional motion.

What would settle it

Take a single $^{40}$Ca$^+$ ion, set its temperature independently with resolved-sideband thermometry, measure its dark-resonance spectrum at several Rabi frequencies and temperatures between 1 and 30 mK, then apply the paper's calibration; the central claim fails if the calibrated readout disagrees with the independent temperature by more than the reported fit errors, since that would show the Maxwell-Boltzmann harmonic benchmark itself does not capture the real motion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that thermal Doppler broadening in a dark-resonance spectrum can be mimicked by an effective dephasing rate, and that although this replacement yields fitted temperatures that can be wrong by up to an order of magnitude, the bias is reproducible and monotonic in the true temperature. Using the oscillatory-shift optical-Bloch simulation as the benchmark and the sideband, Floquet-type method as a cheaper stand-in, the authors build calibration curves that map the dephasing-fitted temperature to the actual temperature; with those curves, fast dephasing fits recover the correct temperature at a fraction of the computational cost. The claim is limited to semiclassical thermal motion of a single ion at milliKelvin temperatures, with micromotion neglected.

Load-bearing premise

The entire calibration rests on treating the oscillatory-shift simulation as the true spectrum, which assumes the ion's motion is harmonic, effectively one-dimensional, thermally distributed according to Maxwell-Boltzmann, and free of micromotion and photon-recoil backaction; if real experimental spectra violate these assumptions, every calibration curve and error estimate collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A lab can fit experimental dark-resonance spectra with the fast dephasing model and then correct the fitted temperature with a precomputed calibration curve, avoiding the roughly twenty-hour oscillatory-shift simulations per curve.
For one-dimensional motion, the sideband approximation reproduces the benchmark oscillatory-shift spectra with near-perfect agreement and runs in seconds, making it the practical choice for generating calibration curves.
The instantaneous relaxation approximation, which works for ordinary two-level Doppler spectra, fails for dark resonances because the electronic relaxation time is no longer short compared with the motion, so it should not be used for these thermometry fits.
When the laser wavevector is nearly aligned with one trap axis, a three-dimensionally moving ion can still be calibrated with a one-dimensional sideband calculation; when the wavevector has comparable projections onto several axes, the calibration error grows.
With multi-pixel fluorescence detection, the same calibrated fitting procedure can be applied ion by ion in a chain, yielding local temperature profiles rather than global normal-mode populations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper's explicit claims, a natural extension is a multi-frequency Floquet treatment that includes two or three secular frequencies, which would extend accurate calibration to fully three-dimensional motion without returning to the slow oscillatory-shift integration.
Whether a single calibration curve can be reused across laser powers and trap geometries is an open question; the reported curves shift with Rabi frequencies, so a practical implementation would likely need to measure or fit the relevant parameters per configuration.
A direct cross-check between calibrated dark-resonance temperatures and resolved-sideband temperatures on the same ion would test the semiclassical Maxwell-Boltzmann benchmark itself, since every calibration curve inherits that benchmark's assumptions.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my read. The paper is a genuine methods comparison, not a new measurement technique. What's new is the systematic side-by-side evaluation of four ways to compute CPT spectra (OBS with oscillatory shift, instantaneous relaxation, Floquet-style sidebands, and effective dephasing), done in both a three-level toy model and the eight-level 40Ca+ structure. The most useful output is the calibration curves for the dephasing model: they show that the cheap dephasing approach, which can underestimate temperature by up to an order of magnitude depending on Rabi frequencies, can be corrected with parameter-dependent curves. The paper is transparent about its limitations—micromotion is neglected, the main benchmark is one-dimensional, no momentum backaction—and the appendix gives a clean two-level check. Data are posted on Dataverse, which is real credit.

Soft spots: the benchmark OBS is never checked against experiment. All 'true' temperatures come from the same semiclassical master-equation framework, so the calibration is internal cross-validation. If the benchmark fails to capture real features (micromotion, 3D wavevector geometry, laser intensity noise), the calibrated thermometer carries that bias silently. The paper does show in Fig 7a that 3D geometry can shift fitted temperatures by about 1.3 mK at 10 mK input, so this is not hidden. There is also no uncertainty quantification on the fitted temperatures. The abstract's phrase 'supporting the use of dark resonances as a practical thermometer' is a bit strong for what is demonstrated; the stronger statement is 'practical within the semiclassical model.' I'd want that tempered or an experimental test.

Overall: the central claim holds within the stated scope. The sideband method is validated against the full OBS in 1D; the dephasing calibration works in the model. It deserves a serious referee. I would recommend peer review with a request for either an experimental data point on the benchmark or softened claims, plus code if they can release it.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper compares four numerical approaches for computing dark-resonance (CPT) fluorescence spectra of a trapped ion in thermal motion, with a view to thermometry: the oscillatory-shift Optical Bloch simulation (OBS), the instantaneous-relaxation approximation, the Floquet/sideband method, and the effective-dephasing model. Treating OBS as the benchmark, the authors show that the sideband method reproduces OBS spectra at reduced cost in one dimension, that the instantaneous approximation fails near dark resonances, and that the effective-dephasing model reproduces spectral shapes only at a substantially different fitted temperature, sometimes lower by an order of magnitude. The proposed remedy is a calibration curve T_fit(T_input) obtained for known Rabi frequencies, shown to be monotonic but parameter-dependent for a three-level and an eight-level 40Ca+ model. The paper concludes that calibrated dephasing fits combine accuracy and computational economy.

Significance. If the calibration procedure transfers to experiment, the paper would make dark-resonance thermometry much more practical for local temperature measurements in ion chains and for thermodynamic studies. The comparison is systematic and the master-equation implementations are standard; the authors provide runtime benchmarks and openly available replication data, which are concrete strengths. The main limitation is that the benchmark itself is a semiclassical model (one-dimensional or single-axis harmonic secular motion, Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, no micromotion, no momentum backaction), and no experimental CPT spectrum is used to validate the calibration. The paper is transparent about these restrictions, but the central claim of a 'practical thermometer' needs either external validation or a more restricted statement. Within its stated model assumptions, the numerical comparison is convincing.

major comments (3)

[Sec. II B and Sec. V] The calibration curves in Figs. 3 and 6 are built by fitting synthetic spectra produced by the OBS/sideband models, which assume one-dimensional or single-axis harmonic secular motion, a Maxwell-Boltzmann energy distribution, negligible micromotion, and no momentum backaction. Since the paper's central claim is that calibrated dephasing yields accurate temperatures ('a practical thermometer'), a load-bearing step is missing: the benchmark has not been compared with any experimental dark-resonance spectrum. A systematic error in the benchmark, for example micromotion or non-collinear three-dimensional Doppler shifts, is inherited directly by the calibration. I would ask the authors to validate the benchmark against existing published data (e.g., Refs. [22,24]) or to explicitly recast the central claim as an internal cross-validation within the semiclassical model.
[Sec. IV B, Fig. 7] The paper shows that in three dimensions with comparable wavevector projections (Fig. 7a), the single-axis sideband calibration itself deviates from the full oscillatory-shift result: T_fit = 3.4 mK versus 4.7 mK for an input temperature of 10 mK. This is a substantial discrepancy in the calibration anchor point. Because the dephasing model contains no motional frequencies at all, the effect of multi-axis motion on the dephasing-based temperature estimate is entirely determined by whichever simulation is used for calibration. The manuscript should provide a prescription for choosing or weighting the calibration axis in multi-axis traps, or should quantify the resulting temperature error for realistic laser and trap geometries; the current text mentions the problem but does not quantify its impact on final temperature estimates.
[Sec. IV A, Figs. 3 and 6] The fitted temperatures are reported without any uncertainty quantification, and the calibration protocol requires Rabi frequencies to be free parameters in the dephasing fit. The paper proposes to fix them by fitting a cold-ion spectrum near 1 mK, but no error propagation or sensitivity analysis is provided for this two-step procedure. Since the output of the method is a temperature with claimed practical accuracy, confidence intervals or a sensitivity measure over the plausible range of Rabi-frequency uncertainty are needed to assess whether the 'beneficial combination of accuracy and computational economy' actually holds.

minor comments (4)

[Eq. (14)] The proportionality sign leaves the prefactor of Gamma_D as a free parameter; the text later says the prefactor choice is critical, but the reader cannot tell from Eq. (14) what value is used in Figs. 2, 3, 5, and 6. Please state the prefactor explicitly in or immediately after the equation.
[Figs. 3 and 6] The calibration curves are monotonic, but no fit residuals or error bars are shown for the dephasing-model fits; a residual plot would help the reader judge how well a single temperature reproduces the full spectrum in the parameter range used for calibration.
[Sec. III A] The runtime comparison ('20 minutes for a three-level system', 'over 20 h on 32 cores for an eight-level system') would be more useful with a note on the numerical integration tolerances and the hardware/software environment, since the economy claim is central to the paper's motivation.
[Eq. (15)] The mapping of the Doppler width to Lindblad dephasing rates is introduced through a square-root combination without a brief dimensional or physical justification; a sentence explaining why the effective linewidths are combined in quadrature would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dephasing method is explicitly calibrated against a distinct, more complete simulation, and the paper's claims are limited to that semiclassical model.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the computationally cheap effective-dephasing approximation can be calibrated against a more accurate oscillatory-shift (OBS) simulation to yield reliable temperature estimates within the stated semiclassical thermal model. This is not circular: the OBS benchmark is an independent, more complete calculation (time-dependent detunings, thermal averaging over mechanical energy), and the calibration curves in Figs. 3 and 6 are presented openly as fits of the dephasing model to those benchmark spectra, not as predictions derived from the dephasing model alone. The fitted temperatures are explicitly compared with the input temperatures of the benchmark, and the discrepancies (including order-of-magnitude underestimation) are reported honestly. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction; the paper instead provides a calibration recipe. The effective-dephasing ansatz is taken from Ref. [22] (not by the current authors) and is critically tested rather than smuggled in. The self-citations (Refs. [26] and [30]) are background references for micromotion effects and for the eight-level Hamiltonian details, and they are not load-bearing for the thermometry claim. The only substantive limitation is that the benchmark itself assumes one-dimensional or quasi-1D secular motion, a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, and no micromotion or backaction; this affects external validity but is not a circularity, because the paper explicitly restricts its conclusions to that semiclassical regime and never claims experimental validation beyond it. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained, transparent, and not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The results depend on a small set of modeling choices: the Maxwell-Boltzmann energy distribution, the neglect of micromotion and backaction, the plane-wave laser assumption, and the treatment of the OBS simulation as ground truth. No new physical entities are introduced; the free parameters are the dephasing prefactor, the fitted temperature, and the Rabi frequencies.

free parameters (3)

Effective dephasing prefactor c in Γ_D = 1/sqrt(2) from Ref. [22]
Eq. (14) uses a prefactor from the literature that the paper shows can underestimate or overestimate temperature; the calibration curve effectively compensates for this choice rather than fitting it directly.
Dephasing-model temperature T_fit = varied to fit spectra
The temperature in the dephasing model is a free fit parameter when matching spectra; the calibration maps it to the input temperature of the benchmark simulation.
Rabi frequencies Ω0 and Ω2 = varied, e.g., Ω0/Γ10 = 0.2, Ω2/Γ12 = 8
In Sec. IV A the paper notes that Rabi frequencies must be left as free parameters to fit spectra, and they affect the calibration curves.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The ion's secular motion is treated classically as a harmonic oscillator with a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of mechanical energies.
Introduced in Sec. II B, Eq. (9); the entire temperature extraction from Doppler-broadened spectra relies on this distribution.
domain assumption Micromotion is neglected; only secular motion affects the dark resonance spectrum.
Sec. II B states micromotion is neglected for simplicity and because it can be strongly reduced by trap compensation.
domain assumption The lasers are treated as plane waves with no spatial dependence of Rabi frequencies.
Sec. III states this assumption to exclude position-dependent coupling, which could alter the spectra at larger amplitudes.
ad hoc to paper The oscillatory-shift Optical Bloch simulation is an accurate benchmark for real spectra.
All other methods are calibrated against this simulation; its own validity is assumed without experimental verification, making it load-bearing for the calibration claims.
standard math Rotating-wave approximation and the Lindblad master equation describe the internal electronic dynamics.
Eqs. (5)-(8); this is the standard open-quantum-system formalism used throughout trapped-ion spectroscopy.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Numerical modeling for trapped-ion thermometry using dark resonances." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TJQUXXHG

@misc{pith2026250504459,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Numerical modeling for trapped-ion thermometry using dark resonances},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TJQUXXHG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04459}
}

read the original abstract

The simulation of vibrational energy transport and quantum thermodynamics with trapped ions requires good methods for the estimation of temperatures. One valuable tool for this purpose is based on the fit of dark resonances in the fluorescence spectrum. However, this fit demands numerical simulations of the coupled electronic-motional dynamics which usually involve a trade-off between accuracy and speed. Here, we discuss several techniques with simplified dynamical equations for the simulation of the spectrum of a trapped ion that undergoes thermal motion, identifying the advantages and limitations of each method. We start with a three-level model to provide a better insight into the approximations involved, and then move on to tackle the experimentally relevant case of an eight-level calcium ion. We observe that mimicking the effect of thermal motion by means of additional dephasing is computationally very convenient, but can lead to significant errors in the estimation of the temperature. Nevertheless, this can be counteracted by a proper calibration, supporting the use of dark resonances as a practical thermometer.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04459 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2: Comparison of three-level spectra calculated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4: Energy diagram of an eight-level system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: Temperature resulting from a fit by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Comparison of eight-level spectra calculated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7: CPT spectrum generated by the oscillatory [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8: Comparison of two-level spectra calculated with the four methods described, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9: Relative time derivative of the excited level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

[1]

Freitas, E

N. Freitas, E. A. Martinez, and J. P. Paz, Heat transport through ion crystals, Physica Scripta 91, 013007 (2015)

work page 2015
[2]

Bermudez, M

A. Bermudez, M. Bruderer, and M. B. Plenio, Controlling and measuring quantum transport of heat in trapped-ion crystals, Physical Review Letters 111, 040601 (2013)

work page 2013
[3]

A. Ruiz, D. Alonso, M. B. Plenio, and A. del Campo, Tuning heat transport in trapped-ion chains across a structural phase transition, Physical Review B 89, 214305 (2014)

work page 2014
[4]

Ruiz-Garc´ ıa, J

A. Ruiz-Garc´ ıa, J. J. Fern´ andez, and D. Alonso, Delocal- ization and heat transport in multidimensional trapped ion systems, Physical Review E 99, 062105 (2019)

work page 2019
[5]

L. Timm, H. Weimer, L. Santos, and T. E. Mehlst¨ aubler, Heat transport in an ion Coulomb crystal with a topo- logical defect, Physical Review B 108, 134302 (2023)

work page 2023
[6]

M. Ramm, T. Pruttivarasin, and H. H¨ affner, Energy transport in trapped ion chains, New Journal of Physics 16, 063062 (2014)

2014
[7]

Onishchenko, G

O. Onishchenko, G. Guarnieri, P. Rosillo-Rodes, D. Pijn, J. Hilder, U. G. Poschinger, M. Perarnau-Llobet, J. Eis- ert, and F. Schmidt-Kaler, Probing coherent quantum thermodynamics using a trapped ion, Nature Communi- cations 15, 6974 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

Z. Meir, M. Pinkas, T. Sikorsky, R. Ben-shlomi, N. Ak- erman, and R. Ozeri, Direct observation of atom-ion nonequilibrium sympathetic cooling, Physical Review Letters 121, 053402 (2018)

work page 2018

Show all 34 references

[9]

Von Lindenfels, O

D. Von Lindenfels, O. Gr¨ ab, C. T. Schmiegelow, V. Kaushal, J. Schulz, M. T. Mitchison, J. Goold, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and U. G. Poschinger, Spin heat en- gine coupled to a harmonic-oscillator flywheel, Physical Review Letters 123, 080602 (2019)

2019
[10]

Roßnagel, O

J. Roßnagel, O. Abah, F. Schmidt-Kaler, K. Singer, and E. Lutz, Nanoscale heat engine beyond the Carnot limit, Physical Review Letters 112, 030602 (2014)

2014
[11]

Neuhauser, M

W. Neuhauser, M. Hohenstatt, P. E. Toschek, and H. Dehmelt, Localized visible Ba + mono-ion oscillator, Physical Review A 22, 1137 (1980)

1980
[12]

B. G. Norton, E. W. Streed, M. J. Petrasiunas, A. Je- chow, and D. Kielpinski, Millikelvin spatial thermome- try of trapped ions, New Journal of Physics 13, 113022 (2011)

2011
[13]

I. A. Boldin, A. Kraft, and C. Wunderlich, Measuring anomalous heating in a planar ion trap with variable ion- surface separation, Physical Review Letters 120, 023201 (2018)

2018
[14]

Mao, Y.-Z

Z.-C. Mao, Y.-Z. Xu, Q.-X. Mei, W.-D. Zhao, Y. Jiang, Z.-J. Cheng, X.-Y. Chang, L. He, L. Yao, Z.-C. Zhou, Y.-K. Wu, and L.-M. Duan, Observation of anomalous heat transport in a trapped ion chain, Physical Review A 105, 033107 (2022)

2022
[15]

D. J. Wineland, R. E. Drullinger, and F. L. Walls, Radiation-pressure cooling of bound resonant absorbers, Physical Review Letters 40, 1639 (1978)

1978
[16]

J. H. Wesenberg, R. J. Epstein, D. Leibfried, R. B. Blakestad, J. Britton, J. P. Home, W. M. Itano, J. D. Jost, E. Knill, C. Langer, R. Ozeri, S. Seidelin, and D. J. Wineland, Fluorescence during Doppler cooling of a sin- gle trapped atom, Physical Review A 76, 053416 (2007)

2007
[17]

R. J. Epstein, S. Seidelin, D. Leibfried, J. H. Wesenberg, J. J. Bollinger, J. M. Amini, R. B. Blakestad, J. Britton, J. P. Home, W. M. Itano, J. D. Jost, E. Knill, C. Langer, R. Ozeri, N. Shiga, and D. J. Wineland, Simplified mo- tional heating rate measurements of trapped io...

2007
[18]

D. J. Wineland, W. M. Itano, J. C. Bergquist, and R. G. Hulet, Laser-cooling limits and single-ion spectroscopy, Physical Review A 36, 2220 (1987)

1987
[19]

Monroe, D

C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, S. R. Jefferts, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland, and P. Gould, Resolved- sideband Raman cooling of a bound atom to the 3D zero- point energy, Physical Review Letters 75, 4011 (1995)

1995
[20]

P. A. Ivanov, Quantum thermometry with trapped ions, Optics Communications 436, 101 (2019)

2019
[21]

Vybornyi, L

I. Vybornyi, L. S. Dreissen, D. Kiesenhofer, H. Hainzer, M. Bock, T. Ollikainen, D. Vadlejch, C. F. Roos, T. E. Mehlst¨ aubler, and K. Hammerer, Sideband thermometry of ion crystals, PRX Quantum 4, 040346 (2023)

2023
[22]

Roßnagel, K

J. Roßnagel, K. N. Tolazzi, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer, Fast thermometry for trapped ions using dark resonances, New Journal of Physics 17, 045004 (2015)

2015
[23]

Peters, B

T. Peters, B. Wittrock, F. Blatt, T. Halfmann, and L. P. Yatsenko, Thermometry of ultracold atoms by electro- magnetically induced transparency, Physical Review A 85, 063416 (2012)

2012
[24]

Tugay´ e, J.-P

V. Tugay´ e, J.-P. Likforman, S. Guibal, and L. Guidoni, Absolute single-ion thermometry, Physical Review A 99, 023412 (2019)

2019
[25]

Leibfried, R

D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions, Reviews of Modern Physics 75, 281 (2003)

2003
[26]

N. A. Nu˜ nez Barreto, M. Bonetto, M. A. Luda, C. Cormick, and C. T. Schmiegelow, Dark resonance spectra of trapped ions under the influence of micromo- tion, Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology 3, 1381117 (2024)

2024
[27]

Oberst, Resonance fluorescence of single barium ions, Master’s thesis, Fakult¨ at der Leopold-Franzens- Universit¨ at Innsbruck (1999)

H. Oberst, Resonance fluorescence of single barium ions, Master’s thesis, Fakult¨ at der Leopold-Franzens- Universit¨ at Innsbruck (1999)

1999
[28]

Sikorsky, Z

T. Sikorsky, Z. Meir, N. Akerman, R. Ben-shlomi, and R. Ozeri, Doppler cooling thermometry of a multilevel ion in the presence of micromotion, Physical Review A 96, 012519 (2017)

2017
[29]

Hettrich, T

M. Hettrich, T. Ruster, H. Kaufmann, C. F. Roos, C. T. Schmiegelow, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and U. G. Poschinger, Measurement of dipole matrix elements with a single trapped ion, Physical Review Letters115, 143003 (2015)

2015
[30]

N. A. Nu˜ nez Barreto, M. Drechsler, and C. T. Schmiegelow, Three-laser coherent population trapping in a multi-Λ system: Theory, experiment, and applica- tions, Physical Review A 106, 053708 (2022)

2022
[31]

URL: https: //doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LS1WOY (2025)

Replication Data for: Numerical modeling for trapped- ion thermometry using dark resonances. URL: https: //doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LS1WOY (2025)

2025 doi
[32]

Demtr¨ oder, Laser spectroscopy (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2002) pp

W. Demtr¨ oder, Laser spectroscopy (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2002) pp. 71–72, 3rd ed. Appendix A: Spectrum of a two-level system In order to better illustrate the effect of thermal mo- tion on the fluorescence spectrum, here we also study the simplest possible model, i.e. th...

2002
[33]

III B, a calculation neglecting memory effects in the electronic dynamics

Two-level system The instantaneous relaxation approximation is, as de- scribed in Subsec. III B, a calculation neglecting memory effects in the electronic dynamics. Under the semiclassi- cal approximation, one can calculate the fluorescence for a thermal state as A4 F(T, ∆)∝ Z...
[34]

The relaxation rate γr is calculated as the absolute value of the smallest real part of the non-zero eigenvalues of the superoperator M generating the evo- lution

Three-level system For the three-level system, we expect the instantaneous approximation to be valid when inequality (11) holds at all times. The relaxation rate γr is calculated as the absolute value of the smallest real part of the non-zero eigenvalues of the superoperator M...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Freitas, E

N. Freitas, E. A. Martinez, and J. P. Paz, Heat transport through ion crystals, Physica Scripta 91, 013007 (2015)

work page 2015

[2] [2]

Bermudez, M

A. Bermudez, M. Bruderer, and M. B. Plenio, Controlling and measuring quantum transport of heat in trapped-ion crystals, Physical Review Letters 111, 040601 (2013)

work page 2013

[3] [3]

A. Ruiz, D. Alonso, M. B. Plenio, and A. del Campo, Tuning heat transport in trapped-ion chains across a structural phase transition, Physical Review B 89, 214305 (2014)

work page 2014

[4] [4]

Ruiz-Garc´ ıa, J

A. Ruiz-Garc´ ıa, J. J. Fern´ andez, and D. Alonso, Delocal- ization and heat transport in multidimensional trapped ion systems, Physical Review E 99, 062105 (2019)

work page 2019

[5] [5]

L. Timm, H. Weimer, L. Santos, and T. E. Mehlst¨ aubler, Heat transport in an ion Coulomb crystal with a topo- logical defect, Physical Review B 108, 134302 (2023)

work page 2023

[6] [6]

M. Ramm, T. Pruttivarasin, and H. H¨ affner, Energy transport in trapped ion chains, New Journal of Physics 16, 063062 (2014)

2014

[7] [7]

Onishchenko, G

O. Onishchenko, G. Guarnieri, P. Rosillo-Rodes, D. Pijn, J. Hilder, U. G. Poschinger, M. Perarnau-Llobet, J. Eis- ert, and F. Schmidt-Kaler, Probing coherent quantum thermodynamics using a trapped ion, Nature Communi- cations 15, 6974 (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Z. Meir, M. Pinkas, T. Sikorsky, R. Ben-shlomi, N. Ak- erman, and R. Ozeri, Direct observation of atom-ion nonequilibrium sympathetic cooling, Physical Review Letters 121, 053402 (2018)

work page 2018