Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 74 references

Supersymmetric pairing of Lambert W-kink nerve impulses

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A nonlinear nerve-membrane model yields exact Lambert W-kink solitons with supersymmetric partner pulses.

desk verdict The SUSY pairing machinery is real, but the paper's central reduction to Eq. (5) has a sign error that severs the link to the nerve model for the plotted parameters. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20509 v1 pith:TKWGDHFQ submitted 2026-07-04 physics.bio-ph nlin.PS

M. F. De la Rosa-López , D.M. Galván-Arellano , J. L. Larios-Ferrer , V. A. Mendoza-Millán , O. Pavón-Torres This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-phnlin.PS
keywords LambertWkinksolitonsHeimburg-JacksonmodelnerveimpulsesupersymmetricpairingfactorizationmethodLiénardequationBoussinesqmembranephasetransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that an improved Heimburg-Jackson model of nerve impulses, extended with third- and fourth-order nonlinear terms, possesses exact travelling-wave solutions whose profile is governed by the Lambert W function, and that these come in supersymmetric partner pairs. The argument runs through a travelling-wave reduction to a Liénard-type equation, a Painlevé test showing the equation is not integrable in the usual sense, and a factorization of the Liénard operator into two first-order factors. Reversing the factors while keeping the damping coefficient fixed produces a partner equation and a partner soliton with the same damping but different amplitude, width, and profile. The paper interprets the partner solutions as mechanically modulated membrane states, with possible relevance to abnormal neural activity and traumatic brain injury.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the factorization of the Liénard-type equation (5) into a product of two first-order differential operators, $(d/d\xi-\phi_2(y))(d/d\xi-\phi_1(y))y=0$, with consistency conditions $\phi_1\phi_2=f(y)/y$ and $\phi_1+\phi_2+y\,d\phi_1/dy=-\tilde{\gamma}$. Imposing the first-order compatibility condition $(d/d\xi-\phi_1)y=0$ turns the second-order equation into a separable first-order one; integrating $dy/[(y-\alpha)^2 y]=d\xi/\sqrt{3}$ produces the Lambert W function, whose multivalued branch structure matches the movable branch point found in the Painlevé test. Reversing $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ while holding $\tilde{\gamma}$ fixed generates the partner Liénard equation and a new potential $V_2(y)$. The cubic equation (19) for $\alpha$ and its discriminant (22) control how many admissible factorization roots exist; the region $D<0$, with three real roots, is what allows heteroclinic kink connections.

What would settle it

Set the dimensionless parameters to one of the paper's example sets, e.g. $p=q=300$, $s=27$, $r=-141$, $k=2$, $\delta=v=1$, keep a small nonzero constant $C$ in the second integration that led to Eq. (5), and integrate the travelling-wave ODE numerically; if the resulting front deviates from the Lambert W-kink profile (27) in a way that does not vanish as $C\to 0$, the 'without loss of generality' step fails and the exact family is incomplete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the generalized Heimburg-Jackson density-wave equation (1), after the rescaling and travelling-wave reduction leading to Eq. (5), admits an exact Lambert W-kink solution, Eq. (27) for one factorization order and Eq. (32c) or Eq. (41) for the other, and that reversing the order of the two first-order factors yields a supersymmetric partner equation whose exact solutions, Eqs. (35c) and (41), are partner solitons. The two partner solitons share the same damping coefficient $\tilde{\gamma}$, which the model associates with the axoplasmic fluid, and the same front speed, differing in amplitude, width, and pulse shape. The associated effective sextic potentials $V_1(y)$ and $V_2(y)$ are explicit, and the paper shows they do not satisfy shape invariance in the strict supersymmetric quantum mechanics sense. This establishes a link between nonlinear electromechanical wave propagation in nerve membranes and supersymmetric quantum mechanics.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two integration constants dropped in the reduction from Eq. (4) to Eq. (5) can be set to zero without losing any travelling-wave solutions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Strongly nonlinear extensions of the Heimburg-Jackson model can support coherent localized density waves even though the reduced equation fails the Painlevé test.
  • Every Lambert W-kink soliton constructed here has a partner soliton with the same damping coefficient and front speed but modified amplitude and width, so supersymmetry offers a systematic way to generate new pulse morphologies from a known one.
  • The two partner potentials $V_1$ and $V_2$ are explicit and not shape invariant, meaning the pairing does not reduce to the usual shape-invariant supersymmetric quantum mechanics families.
  • Reversing the factorization order reverses the phase-transition front, so the same gel-liquid transition can propagate in either direction with different pulse geometry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension not pursued in the paper: if the dropped integration constants are restored, the exact Lambert W form may survive only as a restricted subclass, and the supersymmetric partner construction would need to be re-derived for the full family; checking this is the most direct stress test of the claim.
  • The $D<0$ existence condition ties the kinks to multistability of the effective potential, so the paper implicitly predicts that varying the elastic coefficients $p,q,r,s$ can switch membrane pulse propagation between soliton-supporting and monostable regimes; this is testable in principle by tuning lipid composition or compression.
  • Because the factorization machinery is generic for Liénard-type equations, the same supersymmetric pairing could be applied to other Boussinesq-type biophysical models, such as DNA soliton equations or mechanical metamaterial domain walls, to produce partner waveforms without any membrane-specific assumption.
  • The paper's proposal that partner pulses model mechanically induced perturbations could be made quantitative by comparing fitted amplitude and width changes from the partner formulas against experimentally recorded deformed action potentials under compression, but the paper does not provide such data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies an extended Heimburg–Jackson (HJ) model with higher-order polynomial nonlinearities, Eq. (1)/(4). Under a traveling-wave reduction, the authors claim to obtain the Liénard-type equation Eq. (5), which they factorize to construct exact Lambert W-kink solitons, Eq. (27), and supersymmetric partner solutions, Eq. (35c). The paper also performs a Painlevé analysis, derives effective potentials, and discusses biological interpretations related to traumatic brain injury.

Significance. If the claimed reduction were correct, the paper would establish a novel connection between nonlinear electromechanical waves in biological membranes and supersymmetric quantum mechanics, providing exact solutions for a non-integrable extension of a physically relevant model. The factorization technique is applied carefully, and the internal algebra of the Liénard equation appears consistent, including the same-damping partner construction behind Eq. (36). However, the central link to the physical model is broken by an algebraic error in the reduction, so the advertised physical significance is not established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1, Eqs. (5)–(7)] The traveling-wave reduction of Eq. (4) is algebraically incorrect. Substituting z(ξ), ξ = kζ - v t̃, integrating twice with zero constants, and rescaling z = y/s̃^{1/4} with s̃ = s/(5Λ) yields y'' + (γv/Λ)y' - a1 y - a2 y² - a3 y³ - a4 y⁴ - y⁵ = 0, where a1 = (k² - v²)/(Λk²), a2 = p/(2Λs̃^{1/4}), a3 = q/(3Λs̃^{1/2}), a4 = r/(4Λs̃^{3/4}). Eq. (5) instead has +a2 y². Thus the sign of the quadratic term is opposite to that obtained from Eq. (4). Consequently, the Lambert W-kink (27) and its SUSY partner (35c) are verified only for the abstract Liénard equation (17), not for the stated reduction of the extended HJ model. This invalidates the central claim that these are exact traveling-wave solutions of the physical model.
  2. [§2.1, paragraph after Eq. (5)] The assertion that setting both integration constants to zero is 'without loss of generality' is not justified. The linear-in-ξ constant must vanish for any bounded solution, but the additive constant from the second integration cannot generally be set to zero: it selects the background state and restricts the admissible asymptotic values of the kink. As a result, even if the sign issue were corrected, the derived exact solutions would cover only a special subfamily of traveling waves, not the full physical family.
  3. [§3.2–§3.3, Eqs. (18)–(27), (35a)–(35c)] Because the reduction error changes the sign in front of a2, the coefficient-matching conditions (18a)–(18d), the cubic (19), and the subsequent explicit forms of α, A, and B are all tied to the incorrect Eq. (5). The figures and parameter choices (e.g., p=q=300, s=27, r=-141, k=2, δ=v=1) therefore illustrate solutions of a Liénard equation that is not the reduction of Eq. (4). The paper should either re-derive the analysis for the correct sign or demonstrate explicitly that the error does not affect the existence of Lambert W kinks for physically admissible parameters; as presented, the connection to the Heimburg–Jackson model is unsupported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The phrase 'third and fourth order nonlinearities' is misleading: the model (1) contains nonlinearities up to fourth power in the density, not third and fourth order derivatives. Please clarify the terminology.
  2. [§3.2.2, Eq. (32c) and Fig. 7] The notation y^{(1)}_{2=}(ξ) and the switching between subscripts >, <, and = is difficult to follow; please add a table or a clearer explanation of the notation in the captions.
  3. [§3.3.1, Eq. (36)] The text says the partner equation has 'the same damping coefficient' but Eq. (36) shows ∓γ̃1; the sign convention should be explained, and Figure 4 should be cross-referenced with the sign choices in Eqs. (27) and (35c).
  4. [General] There are several typographical errors, e.g., 'explicity' in §3.2.2 and inconsistent spacing of 'Lambert W' and 'LambertW'. A careful proofreading would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circularity: Lambert W kinks and SUSY partners are derived by explicit factorization; the only self-citations are contextual and non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Equation (5) is the reduced equation; the factorization ansatz Eq. (17) is matched to it through the overdetermined system Eqs. (18a)-(18d), and alpha is obtained as a root of the cubic Eq. (19) that follows algebraically from those matching conditions, not from any fitted data. The Lambert W solution Eq. (27) follows by integrating the compatibility condition Eq. (26), which is a legitimate ansatz branch of the factorization (14)-(16), and the partner equations Eqs. (36)/(43) are obtained by reversing the operator order with the damping coefficient held fixed, reproducing the external method of [47] on a new solution family. The citation to the authors' earlier [42] supplies the Lambert W ansatz and parameter-region conventions, but the matching and construction are carried out in the present paper, so that citation is not load-bearing. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction. The algebraic sign/scale mismatch in Eqs. (6)-(7) noted by the skeptic is a correctness concern about whether the reduction from Eq. (4) to Eq. (5) is valid as printed; it is not a circularity, because it does not make the output equivalent to the input by definition. Self-citations occur but do not force the result.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No genuinely new physical entities are postulated; the supersymmetric partner solitons and effective potentials are derived mathematical constructs. The central claim rests on the HJ model assumptions, the factorization ansatz, and the zero integration constant reduction, which are the main load-bearing premises.

free parameters (1)
  • Illustrative model parameters (p, q, r, s, k, v, delta, gamma) = Various, e.g. p=q=300, s=27, r=-141, k=2, delta=v=1
    Chosen by hand for plots and existence regions; taken as inputs from the model and prior work [42], not fitted to data in this paper. They do not enter the central algebraic derivation except through the constraint D<0.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Phase transition in lipid bilayers and the sound-wave analogy justify the Heimburg-Jackson model, Eq (1).
    Stated in Section 2 as the physical basis for the model; if this analogy is false, the biological interpretation collapses, though the mathematics stands alone.
  • ad hoc to paper Traveling-wave reduction with both integration constants set to zero yields Eq (5).
    Section 2.1 sets integration constants to zero 'without loss of generality', which restricts admissible boundary conditions and is not justified.
  • ad hoc to paper The nonlinearity can be factorized in the specific form (y-alpha)^2(-y^2+Ay+B)y, Eq (17).
    This ansatz determines the admissible parameter region through the cubic for alpha and the discriminant condition D<0; it is a mathematical restriction rather than a consequence of the original PDE.
  • domain assumption Biomembrane parameter restrictions p<0 and q>0, plus the existence region D<0, are adopted from [42].
    Used to select physically relevant parameter ranges and to guarantee multiple real roots for alpha; the values are empirical inputs from earlier work.
  • standard math Properties of the Lambert W function and Cardano's formula for cubic roots are standard.
    Used to write and classify the exact solutions without proof.
  • standard math The Painlevé test in leading-order dominant balance is sufficient to conclude non-integrability in the Painlevé sense.
    Standard practice, though failure of the Painlevé test is not a rigorous proof of non-integrability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Supersymmetric pairing of Lambert W-kink nerve impulses." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TKWGDHFQ

@misc{pith2026260720509,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Supersymmetric pairing of Lambert W-kink nerve impulses},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TKWGDHFQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20509}
}
read the original abstract

Nerve impulses can be modelled as electromechanical density waves within the improved Heimburg-Jackson model. The inclusion of higher-order polynomial nonlinearities leads to a generalized Boussinesq equation with third and fourth order nonlinearities that, under a traveling-wave reduction, reduces to a Li\'enard-type equation. Applying a factorization method yields exact Lambert W-kink soliton solutions that represent localized nonlinear density waves near the membrane melting transition. Beyond providing exact solutions, the factorization uncovers an underlying supersymmetric structure. The associated operators satisfy algebraic relations analogous to those of supersymmetric quantum mechanics, thereby enabling the construction of a partner soliton. This supersymmetric pairing establishes a novel and previously unexplored connection between nonlinear electromechanical wave propagation in biological membranes and supersymmetric quantum-mechanical methods. The resulting framework offers a theoretical foundation for analysing mechanically induced perturbations and their nonlinear propagation in nerve membranes, with potential implications for understanding the biomechanical mechanisms underlying traumatic brain injury.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20509 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of a cylindrical biomembrane and action potential produced by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Graphical representation of the transcendental functions corresponding to ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Graphical representation of the transcendental functions corresponding to ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Lambert W-kink soliton (y (1) 1 (ξ)) and supersymmetric paired Lambert W-kink soliton (y (2) 1=(ξ)) given by Eq. (27) and Eq. (35c), correspondingly, with the chosen parameters p = q = 300, s = 27, r = −141, k = 2, δ = v = 1. (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Lambert W-kink soliton (y (1) 1 (ξ)) and supersymmetric paired Lambert W-kink soliton (y (2) 1=(ξ)) given by Eq. (27) and Eq. (35c) with interchanged signs, respectively, (b) Lambert W-kink soliton and supersymmetric paired Lambert W-kink soliton given by Eq. (27) …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Potential V1(y) and supersymmetric partner potential V2(y) given by Eq. (17) and Eq. (36), correspondingly. For both potentials the illustrative physical parameters were p = 8, k = 2, v = δ = 1, q = 6, r = −9.5 and s = 10.8. It is worth emphasizing that the sextic pote…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Lambert W-kink soliton (y (1) 2=(ξ)) and supersymmetric paired Lambert W-kink soliton (y (2) 2 (ξ)) given by Eq. (32c) and Eq. (41), correspondingly, with the chosen parameters p = q = 500, s = 437, r = −429, k = 2, δ = v = 1. (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Lambert W-kink soliton (y (1) 2=(ξ)) and supersymmetric paired Lambert W-kink soliton (y 2 2 (ξ)) given by Eq. (32c) and Eq. (41) with interchanged signs, respectively, (b) Lambert W-kink soliton (y (1) 2=(ξ)) and supersymmetric paired Lambert W-kink soliton (y 2 2…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Potential V1(y) given by Eq. (17), and (b) and supersymmetric partner potential V2(y) given by Eq. (43). For both potentials the illustrative physical parameters were p = 8, k = 2, v = δ = 1, q = 6, r = −9.5 and s = 10.8. We could delve deeper in the physiological …

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [42]

    Mendoza-Mill´ an, J.L

    V.A. Mendoza-Mill´ an, J.L. Larios-Ferrer, J. Samuel Mill´ an, M.A. Ag¨ uero-Granados, D.M. Galv´ an- Arellano, O. Pav´ on-Torres. Lambert W-Kink solitons arising from higher-order nonlinearities of lipid membranes. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Volume 201, Part 2, 2025, 117260, ISSN 0960-0779, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117260

    work page arXiv 2025

  2. [47]

    H. C. Rosu and O. Cornejo-P´ erez. Supersymmetric pairing of kinks for polynomial nonlinearities. Phys. Rev. E 71, 046607 (2005)

    2005

  3. [1]

    Drukarch B, Holland H A, Velichkov M, Geurts J J G, Voorn P, Glas G and de Regt H W 2018 Thinking about the nerve impulse: a critical analysis of the electricity-centered conception of nerve excitability Progress in Neurobiology 169 172185

    work page 2018

  4. [2]

    Fields R D 2011 Signaling by neuronal swelling Science Signaling 4

    work page 2011

  5. [3]

    & Engelbrecht, J

    Tamm, K., Peets, T. & Engelbrecht, J. The modelling of the action potentials in myelinated nerve fibres. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 25, 13 (2026)

    work page 2026

  6. [4]

    A micromechanical hyperelastic modeling of brain white matter under large deformation

    Karami, G., Grundman, N., Abolfathi, N., Naik, A., Ziejewski, M., 2009. A micromechanical hyperelastic modeling of brain white matter under large deformation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. 2, 243–254

    work page 2009

  7. [5]

    Micromechanics of diffuse axonal injury: influence of axonal orientation and anisotropy

    Cloots, R.J.H., Nyberg, T., Kleiven, S., van Dommelen, J.A.W., Geers, M.G.D., 2011. Micromechanics of diffuse axonal injury: influence of axonal orientation and anisotropy. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 10, 413–422

    work page 2011

  8. [6]

    A micromechanical procedure for modelling the anisotropic mechanical properties of brain white matter

    Abolfathi, N., Naik, A., Chafi, M.S., Karami, G., Ziejewski, M., 2009. A micromechanical procedure for modelling the anisotropic mechanical properties of brain white matter. Comput. Method Biomec. 12, 249–262

    work page 2009

Show all 74 references
  1. [7]

    Faller R 2020 UCD Biophysics 241: Membrane Biology (LibreTexts)

    2020

  2. [8]

    Doman, E.A., Ovenden, N.C., Phillips, J.B. et al. Biomechanical modelling infers that collagen content within peripheral nerves is a greater indicator of axial Young’s modulus than structure. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 24, 297–309 (2025)

    2025

  3. [9]

    Smruta Koppaka, Allison Hess-Dunning, Dustin J. Tyler. Biomechanical characterization of isolated epineurial and perineurial membranes of rabbit sciatic nerve. Journal of Biomechanics 136 (2022) 111058

    2022

  4. [10]

    Singh A, Kozin S and Balasubramanian S (2025) Biomechanical responses of peripheral nerves in human, pig and rat: a comparative study. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 13:1641386. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1641386

    2025

  5. [11]

    Hodgkin A L and Huxley A F 1952 A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve The Journal of Physiology 117 500544

    1952

  6. [12]

    Hodgkin A L and Huxley A F 1952 Currents carried by sodium and potassium ions through the membrane of the giant axon of loligo The Journal of Physiology 116 449472

    1952

  7. [13]

    FitzHugh R 1961 Impulses and physiological states in theoretical models of nerve membrane Biophysical Journal 1 445466

    1961

  8. [14]

    Nagumo J, Arimoto S and Yoshizawa S 1962 An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon Proceedings of the IRE 50 20612070

    1962

  9. [15]

    Heimburg T and Jackson A D 2007 On the action potential as a propagating density pulse and the role of anesthetics Biophysical Reviews and Letters 02 5778

    2007

  10. [16]

    Andersen S S L, Jackson A D and Heimburg T 2009 Towards a thermodynamic theory of nerve pulse propagation Progress in Neurobiology 88 104113. 18

    2009

  11. [17]

    El Hady A and Machta B B 2015 Mechanical surface waves accompany action potential propagation Nature Communications 6

    2015

  12. [18]

    Rvachev M M 2010 On axoplasmic pressure waves and their possible role in nerve impulse propagation Biophysical Reviews and Letters 05 7388

    2010

  13. [19]

    Rvachev and Benjamin Drukarch

    Marat M. Rvachev and Benjamin Drukarch. Surface Waves and Axoplasmic Pressure Waves in Action Potential Propagation: Fundamentally Different Physics or Two Sides of the Same Coin? Biophysical Reviews and Letters Vol. 20, No. 4 (2025) 283–289

    2025

  14. [20]

    Dikand´ e, Gideon A

    Alexander Mengnjo, Alain M. Dikand´ e, Gideon A. Ngwa. Model of the nerve impulse with account of mechanosensory processes: Stationary solutions. J Appl Math Phys, 8 (2020), pp. 2091-2102

    2020

  15. [21]

    On the hybrid model of nerve pulse: Mathematical analysis and numerical results

    Alexander Mengnjo, Jake Leonard Nkeck. On the hybrid model of nerve pulse: Mathematical analysis and numerical results. J Appl Math Phys, 11 (2023), pp. 2373-2396

    2023

  16. [22]

    El-Nabulsi

    R.A. El-Nabulsi. Emergence of lump-like solitonic waves in Heimburg–Jackson biomembranes and nerves fractal model. J R. Soc Interface, 19 (2022), Article 20220079

    2022

  17. [23]

    Gonz´ alez-Ram´ ırez

    Laura R. Gonz´ alez-Ram´ ırez. Fractional-Order Traveling Wave Approximations for a Fractional-Order Neural Field Model. Front. Comput. Neurosci., 23 March 2022

    2022

  18. [24]

    Seadawy, Asghar Ali, Ahmet Bekir

    Aly R. Seadawy, Asghar Ali, Ahmet Bekir. Solitary wave solutions of the nonlinear fractional soliton neuron model via application of five mathematical methods. Modern Phys Lett B (2025), Article 2550098 (20 pages)

    2025

  19. [25]

    Edgar Villagran Vargas, Andrei Ludu, Reinhold Hustert, Peter Gumrich, Andrew D. Jackson, Thomas Heimburg, Periodic solutions and refractory periods in the soliton theory for nerves and the locust femoral nerve, Biophysical Chemistry, Volume 153, Issues 2–3, 2011, Pages 159-167...

    2011 doi

  20. [26]

    Contreras, F

    F. Contreras, F. Ongay, O. Pav´ on, M. Aguero. Non-topological solitons as travelling pulses along the nerve. Int J Mod Nonlinear Theory Appl, 02 (2013), Article 195200

    2013

  21. [27]

    Pav´ on-Torres, M.A

    O. Pav´ on-Torres, M.A. Ag¨ uero-Granados, M.E. Magui˜ na-Palma. Interaction and adiabatic evolution of orthodromic and antidromic impulses in the axoplasmic fluid. Phys Lett A, 521 (2024), Article 129740

    2024

  22. [28]

    Ag¨ uero-Granados, Valencia-Torres

    Pav´ on-Torres, M.A. Ag¨ uero-Granados, Valencia-Torres. R. Adiabatic evolution of solitons embedded in lipid membranes. Phys Scr, 99 (2024), Article 125256

    2024

  23. [29]

    Application of the Exp−φξ-Expansion Method to Find the Soliton Solutions in Biomembranes and Nerves

    Rani, A.; Shakeel, M.; Kbiri Alaoui, M.; Zidan, A.M.; Shah, N.A.; Junsawang, P. Application of the Exp−φξ-Expansion Method to Find the Soliton Solutions in Biomembranes and Nerves. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3372

    2022

  24. [30]

    Razzaq, W., Akbulut, A., Zafar, A. et al. Solitary wave solutions of coupled nerve fibers model based on two analytical techniques. Opt Quant Electron 55, 591 (2023)

    2023

  25. [31]

    Solitons in Neurosciences by the Laplace–Adomian Decomposition Scheme

    Gonz´ alez-Gaxiola, O.; Biswas, A.; Moraru, L.; Alghamdi, A.A. Solitons in Neurosciences by the Laplace–Adomian Decomposition Scheme. Mathematics 2023, 11, 1080

    2023

  26. [32]

    Shahzad T, Baber M Z, Qasim M, Sulaiman T A, Yasin M W and Ahmed N 2024 Explicit solitary wave profiles and stability analysis of biomembranes and nerves Modern Physics Letters B 38

    2024

  27. [33]

    An anatomization of pulse solitons of nerve impulse model via phase portraits, chaos and sensitivity analysis

    Tahira Jamal, Adil Jhangeer, Malik Zawwar Hussain. An anatomization of pulse solitons of nerve impulse model via phase portraits, chaos and sensitivity analysis. Chinese Journal of Physics 87 (2024) 496–509. 19

    2024

  28. [34]

    Ozsahin D U, Ceesay B, baber M Z, Ahmed N, Raza A, Rafiq M, Ahmad H, Awwad F A and Ismail E A A 2024 Multiwaves, breathers, lump and other solutions for the heimburg model in biomembranes and nerves Scientific Reports 14

    2024

  29. [35]

    Younas, U., Muhammad, J., Almutairi, D.K. et al. Analyzing the neural wave structures in the field of neuroscience. Sci Rep 15, 7181 (2025)

    2025

  30. [36]

    Attia Rani, Muhammad Shakeel, Muhammad Sohail, Ibrahim Mahariq. The generalizing riccati equation mapping method’s application for detecting soliton solutions in biomembranes and nerves, Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics, Volume 15, 2025, 101300, ISSN 2666-...

    2025

  31. [37]

    Fedosejevs, & M.F

    C.S. Fedosejevs, & M.F. Schneider, Sharp, localized phase transitions in single neuronal cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119 (8) e2117521119 (2022)

    2022

  32. [38]

    On mathematical modelling of solitary pulses in cylindrical biomembranes

    J¨ uri Engelbrecht, Kert Tamm, Tanel Peets. On mathematical modelling of solitary pulses in cylindrical biomembranes. Biomech Model Mechanobiol (2015) 14:159–167

    2015

  33. [39]

    On the role of nonlinearities in the Boussinesq-type wave equations

    Tanel Peets, Kert Tamm, J¨ uri Engelbrecht. On the role of nonlinearities in the Boussinesq-type wave equations. Wave Motion 71 (2017) 113–119

    2017

  34. [40]

    J¨ uri Engelbrecht, Kert Tamm & Tanel Peets (2017) On solutions of a Boussinesq-type equation with displacement-dependent nonlinearities: the case of biomembranes, Philosophical Magazine, 97:12, 967- 987

    2017

  35. [41]

    On solutions of a Boussinesq-type equation with displacement-dependent nonlinearity: A soliton doublet

    Tanel Peets, Kert Tamm, P¨ aivo Simson, J¨ uri Engelbrecht. On solutions of a Boussinesq-type equation with displacement-dependent nonlinearity: A soliton doublet. Wave Motion 85(2019) 10–17

    2019

  36. [43]

    Demirkaya, A., Decker, R., Kevrekidis, P.G. et al. Kink dynamics in a parametricϕ 6 sys- tem: a model with controllably many internal modes. J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 71 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2017)071

    2017 doi

  37. [44]

    Aϕ 6 soliton with a long-range tail

    Amado, A., Mohammadi, A. Aϕ 6 soliton with a long-range tail . Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 576 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8162-9

    2020 doi

  38. [45]

    Cornejo-P´ erez and H

    O. Cornejo-P´ erez and H. C. Rosu. Nonlinear Second Order Ode’s -factorization and particular solutions- Progress of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 114, No. 3 (2005)

    2005

  39. [46]

    Gonz´ alez, H.C. Rosu, O. Cornejo-P´ erez, S.C. Mancas, Factorization conditions for nonlinear second- order differential equations, in: S. Manukure, W.-X. Ma (Eds.), Nonlinear and Modern Mathematical Physics-Proceedings 2022, Springer, USA, 2024, pp. 81–99

    2022

  40. [48]

    J. A. Onana Inouga, S. E. Mkam Tchouobiap, M. Siewe Siewe, and F. M. Moukam Kakmeni. Action potential-like modes as modulated waves in an extended soliton model for biomembranes and nerves. AIP Advances 15, 015035 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    Acta Math

    Kowalevski, S.: Sur le probleme de la rotation d’un corps solide autour d’un point fixe. Acta Math. 12(1), 177–232 (1889). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02592182. 20

    doi

  42. [50]

    Acta Math

    Kowalevski, S.: Sur une propri´ et´ e du syst´ em d’uations diff´ erentielles qui d´ efinit la rotation d’un corps solide autour d’un point fixe. Acta Math. 14(1), 81–93 (1890). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02413316

    doi

  43. [51]

    Kudryashov

    Nikolay A. Kudryashov. Painlev´ e Test, First Integrals and Exact Solutions of Nonlinear Dissipative Differential Equations. Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, 2025, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 819–836

    2025

  44. [52]

    Abdul-Majid Wazwaz, Compactons, solitons and periodic solutions for some forms of nonlinear Klein–Gordon equations, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Volume 28, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1005-1013, ISSN 0960-0779,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2005.08.145

    2006 doi

  45. [53]

    Hern´ andez-Almada, Octavio Cornejo-P´ erez

    Norman Cruz, A. Hern´ andez-Almada, Octavio Cornejo-P´ erez. Constraining a causal dissipative cosmo- logical model. Physical Review D 100, 083524 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    & Cruz, N

    Belinch´ on, J.A., Cornejo-P´ erez, O. & Cruz, N. Exact solutions of a causal viscous FRW cosmology within the Israel–Stewart theory through factorization. Gen Relativ Gravit 54, 10 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Stability of subsonic and supersonic solitons in DNA

    Dragana Rankovic, DraganPrekrat, Anna Batova, and Slobodan Zdravkovic. Stability of subsonic and supersonic solitons in DNA. Chaos 36, 013147 (2026); doi: 10.1063/5.0277901

    2026 doi

  48. [56]

    Mancas, Haret C

    Stefan C. Mancas, Haret C. Rosu. Integrable dissipative nonlinear second order differential equations via factorizations and Abel equations. Physics Letters A 377 (2013) 1434–1438

    2013

  49. [57]

    Tamaghna Hazra, V. K. Chandrasekar, R. Gladwin Pradeep, and M. Lakshmanan. Exact solutions of coupled Li´ enard-type nonlinear systems using factorization technique. J. Math. Phys. 53, 023511 (2012); doi: 10.1063/1.3684956

    2012 doi

  50. [58]

    Tiwari, S.N

    Ajey K. Tiwari, S.N. Pandey, V.K. Chandrasekar, M. Lakshmanan. Factorization technique and isochronous condition for coupled quadratic and mixed Li´ enard-type nonlinear systems. Applied Math- ematics and Computation 252 (2015) 457–472

    2015

  51. [59]

    G.Gonz´ alez, O.Cornejo-P´ erez, J.de la Cruz, H. C.Rosu. Isochronous waveforms of Li´ enard equations via commutative factorization. Physics Letters A 564 (2025) 131087

    2025

  52. [60]

    Solutions of the generalized Heim- burg–Jackson model for membrane pulses

    Yousef AbuHour, Mohammed Banikhalid and Amirah Azmi. Solutions of the generalized Heim- burg–Jackson model for membrane pulses. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. (2026) 77:193

    2026

  53. [61]

    Yasuda, L.M.Korpas, and J.R.Raney

    H. Yasuda, L.M.Korpas, and J.R.Raney. Transition Waves and Formation of Domain Walls in Multi- stable Mechanical Metamaterials. Physical Review Applied 13, 054067 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    Escobar Ruiz, A.M., Mendoza Tavera, A.N., Sagar, R.P. et al. Wigner-entropy and negativity signatures of tunneling in a sextic double well. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 141, 240 (2026)

    2026

  55. [63]

    & Sagar, R.P

    Mendoza Tavera, A.N., Escobar Ruiz, A.M. & Sagar, R.P. Entropic Characterization of Tunneling and State Pairing in a Quasi-exactly Solvable Sextic Potential. Int J Theor Phys 64, 322 (2025)

    2025

  56. [64]

    The SUSY partners of the QES sextic potential revisited

    Alonso Contreras-Astorga, Adrian M Escobar-Ruiz and Rom´ an Linares. The SUSY partners of the QES sextic potential revisited. Phys. Scr. 99 (2024) 025223

    2024

  57. [65]

    Supersymmetry and quantum mechanics

    E Cooper et al. Supersymmetry and quantum mechanics. Physics Reports 251 (1995) 267-385

    1995

  58. [66]

    Cloots, J.A.W

    R.J.H. Cloots, J.A.W. van Dommelen, M.G.D. Geers. A tissue-level anisotropic criterion for brain injury based on microstructural axonal deformation. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 5 (2012) 41-52

    2012

  59. [67]

    Traumatic axonal injury: Clinic, forensic and biomechanics perspectives

    Delteil C, Manlius T, Bailly N, Godio-Raboutet Y, Piercecchi-Marti MD, Tuchtan L, Hak JF, Velly L, Simeone P, Thollon L. Traumatic axonal injury: Clinic, forensic and biomechanics perspectives. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2024 Sep;70:102465. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102465. Epub 2024...

    2024

  60. [68]

    & Mertens, F

    Ar´ evalo, E., Gaididei, Y. & Mertens, F. Soliton dynamics in damped and forced Boussinesq equations. Eur. Phys. J. B 27, 63–74 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e20020130

    2002 doi

  61. [69]

    https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4128249

    Fan, Kai, Zhou, Cunlong, Exact Solutions of Damped Improved Boussinesq Equations by Extended (G’/G)-Expansion Method, Complexity, 2020, 4128249, 14 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4128249

    2020 doi

  62. [70]

    Guirland, C., Zheng, J.Q. (2007). Membrane Lipid Rafts and Their Role in Axon Guidance. In: Bag- nard, D. (eds) Axon Growth and Guidance. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 621. Springer, New York, NY

    2007

  63. [71]

    Bressloff, Waves in Neural Media (Springer, Berlin, 2014)

    P.C. Bressloff, Waves in Neural Media (Springer, Berlin, 2014)

    2014

  64. [72]

    & Hub´ ık, P

    Mareˇ s, J.J.,ˇSpiˇ cka, V. & Hub´ ık, P. On physical processes controlling nerve signalling. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 232, 3561–3576 (2023)

    2023

  65. [73]

    and Markin, V.S

    Volkov, A.G., Foster, J.C., Ashby, T.A., Walker, R.K., Johnson, J.A. and Markin, V.S. (2010), Mimosa pudica: Electrical and mechanical stimulation of plant movements. Plant, Cell & Environment, 33: 163-173

    2010

  66. [74]

    & Trebacz, K

    Stolarz, M. & Trebacz, K. (2021) Spontaneous rapid leaf movements and action potentials in Mimosa pudica L. Physiologia Plantarum, 173(4), 1882–1888. 22

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.