Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Neural Network-Based Abstract Generation for Opinions and Arguments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.02785 v1 pith:TL3SYITL submitted 2016-06-09 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords summariesabstractiveargumentsevaluationinformationinformativeneuralsystem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the problem of generating abstractive summaries for opinionated text. We propose an attention-based neural network model that is able to absorb information from multiple text units to construct informative, concise, and fluent summaries. An importance-based sampling method is designed to allow the encoder to integrate information from an important subset of input. Automatic evaluation indicates that our system outperforms state-of-the-art abstractive and extractive summarization systems on two newly collected datasets of movie reviews and arguments. Our system summaries are also rated as more informative and grammatical in human evaluation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLMs as Architects and Critics for Multi-Source Opinion Summarization

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new benchmark and prompt framework for generating and automatically evaluating product summaries that blend customer reviews with product metadata, with the best evaluator reaching 0.74 average Spearman correlation ...

Pith tools