Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fairness guarantee in multi-class classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.13642 v3 pith:TLA2YQVO submitted 2021-09-28 math.ST stat.TH

classification math.STstat.TH
keywords fairnessmulti-classclassificationguaranteesoptimalveryadditionalgorithmic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Algorithmic Fairness is an established area of machine learning, willing to reduce the influence of hidden bias in the data. Yet, despite its wide range of applications, very few works consider the multi-class classification setting from the fairness perspective. We focus on this question and extend the definition of approximate fairness in the case of Demographic Parity to multi-class classification. We specify the corresponding expressions of the optimal fair classifiers. This suggests a plug-in data-driven procedure, for which we establish theoretical guarantees. The enhanced estimator is proved to mimic the behavior of the optimal rule both in terms of fairness and risk. Notably, fairness guarantees are distribution-free. The approach is evaluated on both synthetic and real datasets and reveals very effective in decision making with a preset level of unfairness. In addition, our method is competitive (if not better) with the state-of-the-art in binary and multi-class tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 11 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Fairness Overfitting in Machine Learning: An Information-Theoretic Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Claims computable MI/CMI bounds on fairness generalization error, but the core derivation uses an invalid variance-based Hoeffding step.

Pith tools