Probing Neutrino Flavor Composition with the Glashow Resonance at Tau Air-Shower Neutrino Telescopes

Qinrui Liu; Tianyi Ding

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 142 references

Probing Neutrino Flavor Composition with the Glashow Resonance at Tau Air-Shower Neutrino Telescopes

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tau air-shower telescopes can statistically separate electron antineutrinos from tau neutrinos via the Glashow resonance, with mountain-skimming geometry doing the heavy lifting.

desk verdict A useful, honestly-scoped projection of Glashow-induced tau events for TAMBO/TRINITY, whose main weakness is a deliberate zero-smearing assumption that likely makes the quoted R intervals optimistic. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26128 v1 pith:TLBZTF7G submitted 2026-07-28 hep-ph astro-ph.HE

Tianyi Ding , Qinrui Liu This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phastro-ph.HE

keywords neutrinoflavorcompositionGlashowresonancetauair-showertelescopeselectronantineutrinosPeVneutrinosdetectionmountain-skimmingoscillations

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that proposed tau air-shower neutrino telescopes, built to catch tau neutrinos by the air showers their decay taus create, can also catch electron antineutrinos: a ν̄e striking an electron occasionally makes a W− boson at 6.3 PeV (the Glashow resonance), which often decays to a tau plus a tau antineutrino. That tau enters the same shower sample, so the telescopes can statistically separate the ν̄e and ντ+ν̄τ contributions and measure their flux ratio R. The authors simulate neutrino and tau propagation through rock for mountain-skimming and Earth-skimming geometries and find mountain-skimming acceptance for ν̄e roughly three times the tau-neutrino acceptance near resonance, while Earth-skimming acceptance is about 25 times lower. With ten years of a full-size mountain array plus an imaging Cherenkov telescope, standard pp/pγ source models give R constraints around or below 2 at 68% C.L., while a ν̄e-rich neutron-decay flux would be excluded near 90% C.L. A sympathetic reader would care because this yields a new, standalone handle on neutrino flavor — including neutrino versus antineutrino — in the poorly explored PeV–EeV range.

What carries the argument

The Glashow resonance ν̄e + e− → W−, whose 11% tauonic branching W− → τ− + ν̄τ injects taus into the tau sample that a ντ-telescope would otherwise attribute to charged-current tau-neutrino interactions. The mechanism carries the argument because the resonance boosts the ν̄e interaction rate by roughly two orders of magnitude at 6.3 PeV and gives the ν̄e-induced tau spectrum a distinct, peaked shape; coupled with a propagation simulation that follows neutrinos and taus through rock (including tau regeneration), it converts a detection channel blind to electron neutrinos into a statistical flavor discriminator. The geometry contrast — short mountain chords versus long Earth chords — is what d

What would settle it

Run the same propagation and event-rate calculation with a realistic energy-resolution smearing function folded into the tau-energy spectrum at the few-event level; if the Glashow-resonance bump is no longer statistically separable from the DIS-continuum tau events, the claimed R sensitivity collapses. Alternatively, a first dataset of ~20 mountain-skimming tau events with measured energies that shows no peak near the resonance region would contradict the benchmark expectations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that tau air-shower telescopes can measure R = flux(ν̄e)/flux(ντ+ν̄τ) near 6.3 PeV using only their own tau sample. Although ν̄e-induced and ντ-induced taus are indistinguishable event by event, their energy spectra differ — ν̄e events are concentrated around the Glashow resonance while DIS tau events extend more broadly — so a spectral fit can separate them. The simulations show that a mountain-skimming array (short rock chords, ~12 km) preserves the ν̄e flux long enough for resonant conversion to taus that escape, while Earth-skimming neutrinos traverse hundreds of kilometers and the ν̄e is absorbed before producing detectable taus. As a result, the mountain geometry g

Load-bearing premise

The forecast assumes the ν̄e and ντ+ν̄τ contributions can be separated by their spectral shapes, but the analysis sets energy-reconstruction smearing to zero; if real telescopes blur tau energies enough, the Glashow peak washes out and the quoted R intervals widen.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A standalone R measurement is possible without combining with other experiments, filling the PeV–EeV gap between lower-energy Cherenkov telescopes and ultra-high-energy neutrino detectors.
Mountain-skimming arrays, not Earth-skimming ones, are the right place to look for the Glashow-resonance tau signal; Earth-skimming ν̄e absorption makes that channel inefficient.
Ten years of a full-size mountain array plus an imaging Cherenkov telescope can constrain R to ≲2 at 68% C.L. for standard pp/pγ and muon-damped scenarios.
A ν̄e-rich flux, as from neutron-decay sources or new-physics models, stands out and can be excluded at ~90% C.L. if standard scenarios are true, or identified if present.
The pp versus pγ production mechanisms, including muon-damped variants, remain degenerate in R and are not separable with the currently designed configurations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: the quoted intervals assume perfect energy reconstruction; including realistic smearing at the few-event scale will broaden the Glashow peak and widen every R interval, so the sensitivity numbers here are optimistic bounds.
The same statistical separation could be cross-checked by combining the tau-sample measurement with lower-energy flavor measurements, testing whether flavor composition changes with energy across the TeV–EeV range.
The mountain-skimming preference suggests that future site selection for tau arrays should optimize for short, dense rock chords near a valley rather than large Earth-skimming baselines if antineutrino sensitivity is a goal.
Because the simulation code is not released, the acceptance curves cannot be independently reproduced; a public implementation of the modified propagation would let the community test the geometry dependence directly.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Worth your time if you follow tau air-shower neutrino detectors or flavor composition at PeV energies. The paper does something concrete that earlier Glashow-and-tau studies (Huang, Liu, Song, Vincent) left open: it simulates the ̅νe contribution through W− → τ− + ̅ντ for both mountain-skimming and Earth-skimming geometries, and actually projects a standalone measurement of R = f_̅νe/f_ντ+̅ντ. The geometry comparison is the real new content, and the qualitative result is credible: mountain-skimming gives ̅νe acceptance roughly three times the tau-neutrino acceptance near the resonance, while Earth-skimming is about 25 times worse because the Glashow mean free path is short. The event-rate forecasts and the conclusion that standard pp/pγ scenarios are hard to separate are honest.

The simulation work is reasonably anchored. They use a modified TauRunner with PYTHIA 8.3 decay spectra, Doppler broadening and photon radiation corrections, and they validate their acceptances against the TAMBO and TRINITY collaboration numbers. The statistical treatment with Asimov data and Feldman–Cousins intervals is appropriate given the Poisson counts. It is a forecast, not a measurement, and the paper says so.

The main soft spot is exactly where the stress-test lands: no energy-reconstruction smearing anywhere in the sensitivity analysis (stated explicitly after Eq. 2.5). The Glashow-vs-DIS separation relies on spectral shape, and realistic 20–30% tau energy resolution will broaden the resonance peak and mix the templates. With tens of events in ten years, that is not a small correction; the quoted R ≲ 2 at 68% and the neutron-decay exclusion at 90% are optimistic. This is an addressable omission, and the paper would be materially better with a smearing scan. A second, lesser issue is that the modified TauRunner code is not released, so the propagation details can’t be independently checked. Both are fixable.

Some small things: the energy range and flux choices are reasonable, but the results are sensitive to the assumed spectral index, as the authors acknowledge. The citation pattern looks fine; the paper cites the prior Glashow-tau work and positions itself accurately.

For whom: this is for people planning tau air-shower experiments and anyone working on PeV flavor ratios. It deserves a serious referee. It is a solid, useful forecast with one clearly identified optimistic assumption. I would encourage peer review, with the request that the authors add an energy-resolution study and ideally release the modified propagation code.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper argues that tau air-shower neutrino telescopes (TAMBO and TRINITY) can use the Glashow resonance to measure R = Φ_{\bar\nu_e,0}/Φ_{\nu_τ+\bar\nu_τ,0} in the PeV–EeV range. The authors modify TauRunner to include Glashow-resonant \bar\nu_e interactions, propagate neutrinos and taus through mountain and Earth-skimming geometries, compute acceptance and event rates using a published IceCube flux, and project Feldman–Cousins confidence intervals from binned Poisson likelihoods. They find that mountain-skimming acceptance for \bar\nu_e is roughly three times the tau-neutrino acceptance near the resonance, whereas Earth-skimming acceptance is about 25 times smaller. Combining 10 years of TAMBO (5000 or 22000 units) with TRINITY, standard pp/pγ scenarios are projected to constrain R ≲ 2–4 at 68% C.L., while a \bar\nu_e-rich neutron-decay source would be excluded at roughly 90% C.L. with the larger configuration.

Significance. If the projection holds, this is a genuinely new flavor handle in an energy region where the neutrino flavor composition is currently unmeasured. The paper is careful in several respects: it ties the simulation to public tools (TauRunner, PYTHIA8.3), validates the ν_τ+\bar\nu_τ acceptance against collaboration-reported values, and uses Feldman–Cousins intervals with nuisance profiling, which is appropriate for the low-count regime. The central quantity R is not fitted from the projected data but is testable against external flux and oscillation inputs, so the analysis is not circular. However, the quantitative claim depends on the ability to separate the Glashow peak from the smooth DIS spectrum using reconstructed tau energies, and the paper explicitly assumes perfect energy reconstruction. That assumption is not tested and is likely to be optimistic, which makes the current version unsuitable for publication without revision.

major comments (1)

[§2.1 (modified TauRunner)] The sensitivity analysis rests on statistically separating the \bar\nu_e-induced Glashow-resonance tau spectrum (a narrow feature near E_τ ~ 5 PeV) from the smooth ν_τ+\bar\nu_τ DIS spectrum using the binned likelihood of Eq. (3.1). The paper explicitly states 'we do not include a smearing factor in our analysis to account for the energy reconstruction uncertainty' after Eq. (2.5). For tau air-shower telescopes the reconstructed tau energy typically has resolution no better than 20–30%, and near threshold it is worse; even moderate smearing broadens the Glashow peak and increases template overlap. With expected counts of order tens in the resonance window, the quoted intervals (e.g., R ≲ 2 at 68% and the ~90% exclusion of the neutron-decay scenario) can widen substantially. This is a load-bearing, testable optimism. Please rerun the likelihood with a response matrix or, at minimum, with

minor comments (4)

[Table 1 and Table 2 captions] There are typos: 'T able' should be 'Table' in both captions. Also, the caption of Table 2 has 'T able 2' in the compiled text. Please proofread the table captions.
[Eq. (3.1)] The energy binning used in the binned Poisson likelihood is not specified. Given the low statistics and the energy-resolution issue above, the bin width or bin edges should be stated explicitly.
[Eq. (2.6)] The conversion factor 3 and the factor ln(10) in Eq. (2.6) are not explained in the text. Although the formula is plausible, a one-sentence derivation would help the reader verify the normalization.
[Fig. 3 caption] The caption says 'TAMBO (left and middle)' and 'TRINITY (right)' but the text sometimes refers to 'left and right' panels; please check the orientation labels for consistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the R forecast is an Asimov projection against external inputs; self-citations are contextual, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central quantitative output—the expected sensitivity to R = Phi_nuebar,0 / Phi_nutau+nutau,0—is not obtained by fitting R to the data it then claims to predict. Table 1's model values of R are computed from standard benchmark source flavor ratios and NuFIT6.1 oscillation parameters, which are external to this paper's projected event rates. The acceptances entering Eq. 2.5 are obtained from a modified TauRunner propagation simulation (Eqs. 2.1-2.4) and are explicitly cross-checked against the TAMBO and TRINITY collaborations' reported acceptances in Fig. 3, i.e., against external published results. The sensitivity intervals in Fig. 5 and Table 2 are produced by generating Asimov data from the assumed flux model and then applying a Feldman-Cousins likelihood (Eq. 3.1), so no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The self-citations (e.g., Refs. [86], [88], [93], and the broader citation spans involving [58,59,70]) are used as background literature, for the existence of prior Glashow-tau studies, or for the choice to report R rather than a 4-flavor representation; none of these citations supplies the load-bearing numerical result. The explicit neglect of energy-reconstruction smearing ('we do not include a smearing factor in our analysis to account for the energy reconstruction uncertainty,' Sec. 2.1) is a modeling simplification affecting the robustness of the forecasts, but it is not a definitional equivalence or a fitted-input-called-prediction; it concerns correctness/optimism, not circularity. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, with only minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard physics inputs and simulation quality: SM cross sections, W/tau decay branchings, averaged oscillations with NuFIT6.1, detector geometry and duty cycle from proposals, and a modified public propagation code. There are no invented entities and no new fitted parameters beyond the profiled spectral index/normalization and detector choices; the main unstated idealization is perfect energy reconstruction (no smearing).

free parameters (3)

Spectral index gamma = gamma = 2.5 benchmark; varied 2.37-2.87; profiled in likelihood
Event rates and R sensitivity depend strongly on the assumed spectrum; the paper adopts IceCube flux results rather than measuring gamma.
All-flavor flux normalization Phi0 = 10^-18 GeV^-1 cm^-2 s^-1 sr^-1 at 100 TeV per flavor
Normalization taken from the IceCube combined fit [9] and profiled in the Asimov analysis.
Effective geometric area and duty cycle = Ageo ~ 100 km^2 (TAMBO 22000 units), ~30 km^2 (5000 units); 100% duty TAMBO, 20% duty TRINITY
Chosen from detector proposals; a change at the tens-of-percent level directly scales event counts and the resulting R intervals.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Standard Model Glashow resonance cross section with Doppler broadening and initial-state radiation corrections (~30% suppression at peak) from Refs. [103-105,87].
Invoked in Eqs. (2.1)-(2.3) and Sec. 2.1; if these corrections are wrong, the \bar{\nu}_e-induced tau rate changes by tens of percent and the R sensitivity shifts.
domain assumption W^- decay branching ratios and spectra from PYTHIA8.3, including BR(W->tau nu) ~ 11% and visible tau decay BR ~ 82.6%.
The Glashow-induced tau flux is proportional to the W->tau nu branching ratio and the visible tau decay fraction used in the acceptance.
domain assumption Averaged three-flavor neutrino oscillations with NuFIT6.1 best-fit parameters and normal mass ordering.
Used to convert source flavor ratios into Earth flavor ratios and the predicted R values in Table 1.
domain assumption Benchmark source flavor ratios: pp, p-gamma, muon-damped variants, and neutron-decay scenarios as given in Table 1.
The discrimination conclusions are relative to these standard astrophysical production benchmarks.
domain assumption TauRunner correctly simulates DIS, tau energy loss and regeneration; the authors' modification adding Glashow interactions is faithful.
The entire acceptance/event-rate calculation inherits this; the only validation shown is comparison to collaboration-reported acceptances.
ad hoc to paper Perfect energy reconstruction (no smearing) in the sensitivity analysis.
Stated in Sec. 2.1 after Eq. (2.5); likely optimistic for the spectral-shape-based separation of \bar{\nu}_e and \nu_\tau signals.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing Neutrino Flavor Composition with the Glashow Resonance at Tau Air-Shower Neutrino Telescopes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TLBZTF7G

@misc{pith2026260726128,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing Neutrino Flavor Composition with the Glashow Resonance at Tau Air-Shower Neutrino Telescopes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TLBZTF7G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26128}
}

abstract

The flavor composition of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos encodes information about their production and propagation. The Glashow resonance, $\bar{\nu}_e + e^-\to W^-$, provides a unique way to distinguish antineutrinos from neutrinos and thereby extends the reach of flavor composition studies. Proposed tau air-shower neutrino telescopes target Earth-skimming and mountain-skimming $\nu_\tau$ above a PeV, but through the decay $W^-\to \bar{\nu}_\tau+\tau^-$ they are also sensitive to $\bar{\nu}_e$. These experiments can therefore measure the ratio of $\bar{\nu}_e$ to $\nu_\tau+\bar{\nu}_\tau$ fluxes. We evaluate this prospect with explicit simulations and project sensitivities for TAMBO and TRINITY, assuming 10 years of operation. We find that mountain-skimming geometries yield substantially higher $\bar{\nu}_e$ acceptance than Earth-skimming ones due to the shorter path length in rock. For standard astrophysical source scenarios, our projections show that differentiating $pp$ and $p\gamma$ production, including their muon-damped scenarios, is challenging with a standalone measurement by tau air-shower experiments in their currently designed configurations, though optimistically the flux ratio can be constrained to $\lesssim$2 at 1$\sigma$. A $\bar{\nu}_e$-rich flux, as expected from neutron-decay sources or from certain new physics models, would stand out from the standard pion-production scenarios and can otherwise be constrained.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 123 linked inside Pith

[1]

IceCube collaboration, Evidence for High-Energy Extraterrestrial Neutrinos at the IceCube Detector, Science 342 (2013) 1242856 [ 1311.5238]

arXiv 2013
[2]

IceCube, Fermi-LAT, MAGIC, AGILE, ASAS-SN, HA WC, H.E.S.S., INTEGRAL, Kanata, Kiso, Kapteyn, Liverpool Telescope, Subaru, Swift NuSTAR, VERITAS, VLA/17B-403collaboration, Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A , Science 361 (2018) eaat1378 [1807.08816]

arXiv 2018
[3]

IceCube collaboration, Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert , Science 361 (2018) 147 [ 1807.08794]

arXiv 2018
[4]

IceCube collaboration, Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068, Science 378 (2022) 538 [ 2211.09972]. – 13 –

arXiv 2022
[5]

IceCube collaboration, Observation of high-energy neutrinos from the Galactic plane , Science 380 (2023) adc9818 [ 2307.04427]

arXiv 2023
[6]

O. Mena, S. Palomares-Ruiz and A.C. Vincent, Flavor Composition of the High-Energy Neutrino Events in IceCube , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 091103 [ 1404.0017]

arXiv 2014
[7]

Palomares-Ruiz, A.C

S. Palomares-Ruiz, A.C. Vincent and O. Mena, Spectral analysis of the high-energy IceCube neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 103008 [ 1502.02649]

arXiv 2015
[8]

IceCube collaboration, Flavor Ratio of Astrophysical Neutrinos above 35 TeV in IceCube , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 171102 [ 1502.03376]

arXiv 2015

Show all 142 references

[9]

IceCube collaboration, A combined maximum-likelihood analysis of the high-energy astrophysical neutrino flux measured with IceCube , Astrophys. J. 809 (2015) 98 [ 1507.03991]

2015 arXiv
[10]

Vincent, S

A.C. Vincent, S. Palomares-Ruiz and O. Mena, Analysis of the 4-year IceCube high-energy starting events , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 023009 [ 1605.01556]

2016 arXiv
[11]

Song, S.W

N. Song, S.W. Li, C.A. Arg¨ uelles, M. Bustamante and A.C. Vincent, The Future of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrino Flavor Measurements , JCAP 04 (2021) 054 [2012.12893]

2021 arXiv
[12]

IceCube collaboration, Detection of astrophysical tau neutrino candidates in IceCube , Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 1031 [ 2011.03561]

2022
[13]

Abbasi et al., Characterization of the Three-Flavor Composition of Cosmic Neutrinos with IceCube, 2510.24957

R. Abbasi et al., Characterization of the Three-Flavor Composition of Cosmic Neutrinos with IceCube, 2510.24957
[14]

Learned and S

J.G. Learned and S. Pakvasa, Detecting tau-neutrino oscillations at PeV energies , Astropart. Phys. 3 (1995) 267 [ hep-ph/9405296]

1995 arXiv
[15]

Athar, M

H. Athar, M. Jezabek and O. Yasuda, Effects of neutrino mixing on high-energy cosmic neutrino flux , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 103007 [ hep-ph/0005104]

2000 arXiv
[16]

Crocker, F

R.M. Crocker, F. Melia and R.R. Volkas, Searching for long wavelength neutrino oscillations in the distorted neutrino spectrum of galactic supernova remnants , Astrophys. J. Suppl. 141 (2002) 147 [ astro-ph/0106090]

2002 arXiv
[17]

Beacom, N.F

J.F. Beacom, N.F. Bell, D. Hooper, S. Pakvasa and T.J. Weiler, Decay of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 181301 [ hep-ph/0211305]

2003 arXiv
[18]

Barenboim and C

G. Barenboim and C. Quigg, Neutrino observatories can characterize cosmic sources and neutrino properties, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 073024 [ hep-ph/0301220]

2003 arXiv
[19]

Beacom, N.F

J.F. Beacom, N.F. Bell, D. Hooper, S. Pakvasa and T.J. Weiler, Measuring flavor ratios of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 093005 [ hep-ph/0307025]

2003 arXiv
[20]

Beacom, N.F

J.F. Beacom, N.F. Bell, D. Hooper, J.G. Learned, S. Pakvasa and T.J. Weiler, PseudoDirac neutrinos: A Challenge for neutrino telescopes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 011101 [hep-ph/0307151]

2004 arXiv
[21]

Beacom, N.F

J.F. Beacom, N.F. Bell, D. Hooper, S. Pakvasa and T.J. Weiler, Sensitivity to theta(13) and delta in the decaying astrophysical neutrino scenario , Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 017303 [hep-ph/0309267]

2004 arXiv
[22]

Serpico, Probing the 2-3 leptonic mixing at high-energy neutrino telescopes , Phys

P.D. Serpico, Probing the 2-3 leptonic mixing at high-energy neutrino telescopes , Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 047301 [ hep-ph/0511313]

2006 arXiv
[23]

O. Mena, I. Mocioiu and S. Razzaque, Oscillation effects on high-energy neutrino fluxes from astrophysical hidden sources, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 063003 [ astro-ph/0612325]

2007 arXiv
[24]

Kachelriess and R

M. Kachelriess and R. Tom` as,High energy neutrino yields from astrophysical sources I: Weakly magnetized sources, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 063009 [ astro-ph/0606406]. – 14 –

2006 arXiv
[25]

Pakvasa, W

S. Pakvasa, W. Rodejohann and T.J. Weiler, Flavor Ratios of Astrophysical Neutrinos: Implications for Precision Measurements, JHEP 02 (2008) 005 [ 0711.4517]

2008 arXiv
[26]

Esmaili and Y

A. Esmaili and Y. Farzan, An Analysis of Cosmic Neutrinos: Flavor Composition at Source and Neutrino Mixing Parameters , Nucl. Phys. B 821 (2009) 197 [ 0905.0259]

2009 arXiv
[27]

Choubey and W

S. Choubey and W. Rodejohann, Flavor Composition of UHE Neutrinos at Source and at Neutrino Telescopes, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 113006 [ 0909.1219]

2009 arXiv
[28]

Esmaili, Pseudo-Dirac Neutrino Scenario: Cosmic Neutrinos at Neutrino Telescopes , Phys

A. Esmaili, Pseudo-Dirac Neutrino Scenario: Cosmic Neutrinos at Neutrino Telescopes , Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 013006 [ 0909.5410]

2010 arXiv
[29]

Bhattacharya, S

A. Bhattacharya, S. Choubey, R. Gandhi and A. Watanabe, Diffuse Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Fluxes and Physics Beyond the Standard Model , Phys. Lett. B 690 (2010) 42 [0910.4396]

2010 arXiv
[30]

Bhattacharya, S

A. Bhattacharya, S. Choubey, R. Gandhi and A. Watanabe, Ultra-high neutrino fluxes as a probe for non-standard physics , JCAP 09 (2010) 009 [ 1006.3082]

2010 arXiv
[31]

Bustamante, A.M

M. Bustamante, A.M. Gago and C. Pe˜ na-Garay,Energy-Independent New Physics in the Flavour Ratios of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos , JHEP 04 (2010) 066 [ 1001.4878]

2010 arXiv
[32]

Mehta and W

P. Mehta and W. Winter, Interplay of energy dependent astrophysical neutrino flavor ratios and new physics effects , JCAP 03 (2011) 041 [ 1101.2673]

2011 arXiv
[33]

Baerwald, M

P. Baerwald, M. Bustamante and W. Winter, Neutrino Decays over Cosmological Distances and the Implications for Neutrino Telescopes , JCAP 10 (2012) 020 [ 1208.4600]

2012 arXiv
[34]

L. Fu, C.M. Ho and T.J. Weiler, Cosmic Neutrino Flavor Ratios with Broken νµ − ντ Symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2012) 558 [ 1209.5382]

2012 arXiv
[35]

Pakvasa, A

S. Pakvasa, A. Joshipura and S. Mohanty, Explanation for the low flux of high energy astrophysical muon-neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 171802 [ 1209.5630]

2013 arXiv
[36]

Chatterjee, M.M

A. Chatterjee, M.M. Devi, M. Ghosh, R. Moharana and S.K. Raut, Probing CP violation with the first three years of ultrahigh energy neutrinos from IceCube , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 073003 [1312.6593]

2014 arXiv
[37]

Xu, H.-J

X.-J. Xu, H.-J. He and W. Rodejohann, Constraining astrophysical neutrino flavor composition from leptonic unitarity , JCAP 12 (2014) 039 [ 1407.3736]

2014 arXiv
[38]

Aeikens, H

E. Aeikens, H. P¨ as, S. Pakvasa and P. Sicking,Flavor ratios of extragalactic neutrinos and neutrino shortcuts in extra dimensions , JCAP 10 (2015) 005 [ 1410.0408]

2015 arXiv
[39]

Palladino, G

A. Palladino, G. Pagliaroli, F.L. Villante and F. Vissani, What is the Flavor of the Cosmic Neutrinos Seen by IceCube? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 171101 [ 1502.02923]

2015 arXiv
[40]

Arg¨ uelles, T

C.A. Arg¨ uelles, T. Katori and J. Salvad´ o,New Physics in Astrophysical Neutrino Flavor , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 161303 [ 1506.02043]

2015 arXiv
[41]

Bustamante, J.F

M. Bustamante, J.F. Beacom and W. Winter, Theoretically palatable flavor combinations of astrophysical neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 161302 [ 1506.02645]

2015 arXiv
[42]

Pagliaroli, A

G. Pagliaroli, A. Palladino, F. Villante and F. Vissani, Testing nonradiative neutrino decay scenarios with IceCube data , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 113008 [ 1506.02624]

2015 arXiv
[43]

de Salas, R

P. de Salas, R. Lineros and M. T´ ortola,Neutrino propagation in the galactic dark matter halo , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 123001 [ 1601.05798]

2016 arXiv
[44]

Gonz´ alez-Garc ´ ıa, M

M. Gonz´ alez-Garc ´ ıa, M. Maltoni, I. Mart ´ ınez-Soler and N. Song,Non-standard neutrino interactions in the Earth and the flavor of astrophysical neutrinos , Astropart. Phys. 84 (2016) 15 [1605.08055]

2016 arXiv
[45]

Bustamante, J.F

M. Bustamante, J.F. Beacom and K. Murase, Testing decay of astrophysical neutrinos with incomplete information, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 063013 [ 1610.02096]. – 15 –

2017 arXiv
[46]

Rasmussen, L

R.W. Rasmussen, L. Lechner, M. Ackermann, M. Kowalski and W. Winter, Astrophysical neutrinos flavored with Beyond the Standard Model physics , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 083018 [1707.07684]

2017 arXiv
[47]

U.K. Dey, D. Kar, M. Mitra, M. Spannowsky and A.C. Vincent, Searching for Leptoquarks at IceCube and the LHC , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 035014 [ 1709.02009]

2018 arXiv
[48]

Bustamante and S.K

M. Bustamante and S.K. Agarwalla, Universe’s Worth of Electrons to Probe Long-Range Interactions of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 061103 [1808.02042]

2019 arXiv
[49]

Farzan and S

Y. Farzan and S. Palomares-Ruiz, Flavor of cosmic neutrinos preserved by ultralight dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 051702 [ 1810.00892]

2019 arXiv
[50]

Ahlers, M

M. Ahlers, M. Bustamante and S. Mu, Unitarity Bounds of Astrophysical Neutrinos , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 123023 [ 1810.00893]

2018 arXiv
[51]

Brdar and R.S

V. Brdar and R.S. Hansen, IceCube Flavor Ratios with Identified Astrophysical Sources: Towards Improving New Physics Testability , JCAP 02 (2019) 023 [ 1812.05541]

2019 arXiv
[52]

Palladino, The flavor composition of astrophysical neutrinos after 8 years of IceCube: an indication of neutron decay scenario? , Eur

A. Palladino, The flavor composition of astrophysical neutrinos after 8 years of IceCube: an indication of neutron decay scenario? , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 500 [ 1902.08630]

2019 arXiv
[53]

Bustamante and M

M. Bustamante and M. Ahlers, Inferring the flavor of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos at their sources, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 241101 [ 1901.10087]

2019 arXiv
[54]

Ahlers, M

M. Ahlers, M. Bustamante and N.G.N. Willesen, Flavors of astrophysical neutrinos with active-sterile mixing , JCAP 07 (2021) 029 [ 2009.01253]

2021 arXiv
[55]

Karmakar, S

S. Karmakar, S. Pandey and S. Rakshit, Astronomy with energy dependent flavour ratios of extragalactic neutrinos, JHEP 10 (2021) 004 [ 2010.07336]

2021 arXiv
[56]

Fiorillo, G

D.F.G. Fiorillo, G. Mangano, S. Morisi and O. Pisanti, IceCube constraints on violation of equivalence principle, JCAP 04 (2021) 079 [ 2012.07867]

2021 arXiv
[57]

Dev, P.A.N

P.S.B. Dev, P.A.N. Machado and I. Martinez-Soler, Pseudo-Dirac neutrinos and relic neutrino matter effect on the high-energy neutrino flavor composition , Phys. Lett. B 862 (2025) 139306 [2406.18507]

2025 arXiv
[58]

Bustamante, Q

M. Bustamante, Q. Liu and G. Barenboim, Measuring neutrino mixing above 1 TeV with astrophysical neutrinos, 2602.14308
[59]

Bustamante, Q

M. Bustamante, Q. Liu and G. Barenboim, Astrophysical bounds on the high-energy evolution of neutrino mixing , 2604.14409

arXiv
[60]

Kashti and E

T. Kashti and E. Waxman, Flavoring astrophysical neutrinos: Flavor ratios depend on energy , Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 181101 [ astro-ph/0507599]

2005 arXiv
[61]

Lipari, M

P. Lipari, M. Lusignoli and D. Meloni, Flavor Composition and Energy Spectrum of Astrophysical Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 123005 [ 0704.0718]

2007 arXiv
[62]

H¨ ummer, M

S. H¨ ummer, M. Maltoni, W. Winter and C. Yaguna, Energy dependent neutrino flavor ratios from cosmic accelerators on the Hillas plot , Astropart. Phys. 34 (2010) 205 [ 1007.0006]

2010 arXiv
[63]

Baerwald, S

P. Baerwald, S. H¨ ummer and W. Winter,Systematics in the Interpretation of Aggregated Neutrino Flux Limits and Flavor Ratios from Gamma-Ray Bursts , Astropart. Phys. 35 (2012) 508 [1107.5583]

2012 arXiv
[64]

Bustamante and I

M. Bustamante and I. Tamborra, Using high-energy neutrinos as cosmic magnetometers , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 123008 [ 2009.01306]

2020
[65]

Fiorillo, A

D.F.G. Fiorillo, A. Van Vliet, S. Morisi and W. Winter, Unified thermal model for photohadronic neutrino production in astrophysical sources , JCAP 07 (2021) 028 [2103.16577]. – 16 –

2021 arXiv
[66]

Bhattacharya, R

A. Bhattacharya, R. Enberg, M.H. Reno and I. Sarcevic, Energy-dependent flavour ratios in neutrino telescopes from charm , 2309.09139

arXiv
[67]

Minakata and A.Y

H. Minakata and A.Y. Smirnov, High-energy cosmic neutrinos and the equivalence principle , Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 3698 [ hep-ph/9601311]

1996 arXiv
[68]

Shoemaker and K

I.M. Shoemaker and K. Murase, Probing BSM Neutrino Physics with Flavor and Spectral Distortions: Prospects for Future High-Energy Neutrino Telescopes , Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 085004 [1512.07228]

2016 arXiv
[69]

Abdullahi and P.B

A. Abdullahi and P.B. Denton, Visible Decay of Astrophysical Neutrinos at IceCube , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 023018 [ 2005.07200]

2020 arXiv
[70]

Liu, D.F.G

Q. Liu, D.F.G. Fiorillo, C.A. Arg¨ uelles, M. Bustamante, N. Song and A.C. Vincent, Identifying energy-dependent flavor transitions in high-energy astrophysical neutrino measurements, Phys. Rev. D 112 (2025) 043019 [ 2312.07649]

2025 arXiv
[71]

Gandhi, C

R. Gandhi, C. Quigg, M.H. Reno and I. Sarcevic, Ultrahigh-energy neutrino interactions, Astropart. Phys. 5 (1996) 81 [ hep-ph/9512364]

1996 arXiv
[72]

Formaggio and G.P

J.A. Formaggio and G.P. Zeller, From eV to EeV: Neutrino Cross Sections Across Energy Scales, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 1307 [ 1305.7513]

2012 arXiv
[73]

Glashow, Resonant Scattering of Antineutrinos , Phys

S.L. Glashow, Resonant Scattering of Antineutrinos , Phys. Rev. 118 (1960) 316

1960
[74]

IceCube collaboration, Detection of a particle shower at the Glashow resonance with IceCube, Nature 591 (2021) 220 [ 2110.15051]

2021
[75]

Brown and F.W

R.W. Brown and F.W. Stecker, Cosmic Ray Neutrino Tests for Heavier Weak Bosons and Cosmic Antimatter, Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 373

1982
[76]

Anchordoqui, H

L.A. Anchordoqui, H. Goldberg, F. Halzen and T.J. Weiler, Neutrinos as a diagnostic of high energy astrophysical processes, Phys. Lett. B621 (2005) 18 [ hep-ph/0410003]

2005 arXiv
[77]

Bhattacharya, R

A. Bhattacharya, R. Gandhi, W. Rodejohann and A. Watanabe, The Glashow resonance at IceCube: signatures, event rates and pp vs. pγ interactions, JCAP 10 (2011) 017 [1108.3163]

2011 arXiv
[78]

Xing and S

Z.-z. Xing and S. Zhou, The Glashow resonance as a discriminator of UHE cosmic neutrinos originating from p-gamma and p-p collisions , Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 033006 [ 1105.4114]

2011 arXiv
[79]

Barger, J

V. Barger, J. Learned and S. Pakvasa, IceCube PeV Cascade Events Initiated by Electron-Antineutrinos at Glashow Resonance, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 037302 [ 1207.4571]

2013 arXiv
[80]

Bhattacharya, R

A. Bhattacharya, R. Gandhi, W. Rodejohann and A. Watanabe, On the interpretation of IceCube cascade events in terms of the Glashow resonance , 1209.2422

arXiv
[81]

Anchordoqui, T.C

L.A. Anchordoqui, T.C. Paul, L.H.M. da Silva, D.F. Torres and B.J. Vlcek, What IceCube data tell us about neutrino emission from star-forming galaxies (so far) , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 127304 [ 1405.7648]

2014 arXiv
[82]

Barger, L

V. Barger, L. Fu, J.G. Learned, D. Marfatia, S. Pakvasa and T.J. Weiler, Glashow resonance as a window into cosmic neutrino sources , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 121301 [ 1407.3255]

2014 arXiv
[83]

Palladino, G

A. Palladino, G. Pagliaroli, F.L. Villante and F. Vissani, Double pulses and cascades above 2 PeV in IceCube , Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 52 [ 1510.05921]

2016 arXiv
[84]

Anchordoqui, M.M

L.A. Anchordoqui, M.M. Block, L. Durand, P. Ha, J.F. Soriano and T.J. Weiler, Evidence for a break in the spectrum of astrophysical neutrinos , Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 083009 [1611.07905]

2017 arXiv
[85]

Biehl, A

D. Biehl, A. Fedynitch, A. Palladino, T.J. Weiler and W. Winter, Astrophysical Neutrino Production Diagnostics with the Glashow Resonance , JCAP 01 (2017) 033 [ 1611.07983]

2017 arXiv
[86]

Huang and Q

G.-y. Huang and Q. Liu, Hunting the Glashow Resonance with PeV Neutrino Telescopes , JCAP 03 (2020) 005 [ 1912.02976]. – 17 –

2020 arXiv
[87]

Huang, M

G.-y. Huang, M. Lindner and N. Volmer, Inferring astrophysical neutrino sources from the Glashow resonance, JHEP 11 (2023) 164 [ 2303.13706]

2023 arXiv
[88]

Q. Liu, N. Song and A.C. Vincent, Probing neutrino production in high-energy astrophysical neutrino sources with the Glashow resonance , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 043022 [ 2304.06068]

2023 arXiv
[89]

Huang, Discovery potential of the Glashow resonance in an air shower neutrino telescope, Chin

G.-y. Huang, Discovery potential of the Glashow resonance in an air shower neutrino telescope, Chin. Phys. C 48 (2024) 085107 [ 2307.12153]

2024 arXiv
[90]

Stecker, S.T

F.W. Stecker, S.T. Scully, S. Liberati and D. Mattingly, Searching for Traces of Planck-Scale Physics with High Energy Neutrinos , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 045009 [ 1411.5889]

2015 arXiv
[91]

Bustamante, New limits on neutrino decay from the Glashow resonance of high-energy cosmic neutrinos, 2004.06844

M. Bustamante, New limits on neutrino decay from the Glashow resonance of high-energy cosmic neutrinos, 2004.06844

2004 arXiv
[92]

Xu and S.-J

D.-H. Xu and S.-J. Rong, Connect the Lorentz violation to the Glashow resonance event , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 38 (2023) 2350029 [ 2211.05478]

2023 arXiv
[93]

Q. Liu, N. Song and A.C. Vincent, Constraints on heavy asymmetric and symmetric dark matter from the Glashow resonance , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) L111701 [ 2406.14602]

2025 arXiv
[94]

Sasaki and G.W.-S

M. Sasaki and G.W.-S. Hou, Neutrino Telescope Array Letter of Intent: A Large Array of High Resolution Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov and Fluorescence Detectors for Survey of Air-showers from Cosmic Tau Neutrinos in the PeV-EeV Energy Range , 1408.6244

arXiv
[95]

Romero-Wolf et al., An Andean Deep-Valley Detector for High-Energy Tau Neutrinos , in Latin American Strategy Forum for Research Infrastructure, 2, 2020 [ 2002.06475]

A. Romero-Wolf et al., An Andean Deep-Valley Detector for High-Energy Tau Neutrinos , in Latin American Strategy Forum for Research Infrastructure, 2, 2020 [ 2002.06475]

2020 arXiv
[96]

TAMBO collaboration, TAMBO: A Deep-Valley Neutrino Observatory , 2507.08070

arXiv
[97]

Otte, A.M

A.N. Otte, A.M. Brown, A.D. Falcone, M. Mariotti and I. Taboada, Trinity: An Air-Shower Imaging System for the Detection of Ultrahigh Energy Neutrinos , PoS ICRC2019 (2020) 976 [1907.08732]

2020 arXiv
[98]

Halzen and D

F. Halzen and D. Saltzberg, Tau-neutrino appearance with a 1000 megaparsec baseline , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 4305 [ hep-ph/9804354]

1998 arXiv
[99]

Beacom, P

J.F. Beacom, P. Crotty and E.W. Kolb, Enhanced Signal of Astrophysical Tau Neutrinos Propagating through Earth, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 021302 [ astro-ph/0111482]

2002 arXiv
[100]

Dutta, M.H

S.I. Dutta, M.H. Reno and I. Sarcevic, Secondary neutrinos from tau neutrino interactions in earth, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 077302 [ hep-ph/0207344]

2002 arXiv
[101]

Bugaev, T

E. Bugaev, T. Montaruli, Y. Shlepin and I.A. Sokalski, Propagation of tau neutrinos and tau leptons through the earth and their detection in underwater / ice neutrino telescopes , Astropart. Phys. 21 (2004) 491 [ hep-ph/0312295]

2004 arXiv
[102]

Koehne, K

J.-H. Koehne, K. Frantzen, M. Schmitz, T. Fuchs, W. Rhode, D. Chirkin et al., Proposal: A tool for propagation of charged leptons , Computer Physics Communications 184 (2013) 2070

2013
[103]

Loewy, S

A. Loewy, S. Nussinov and S.L. Glashow, The Effect of Doppler Broadening on the 6.3 P eV W − Resonance in ¯νee− Collisions, 1407.4415

arXiv
[104]

Gauld, Precise predictions for multi-TeV and PeV energy neutrino scattering rates , Phys

R. Gauld, Precise predictions for multi-TeV and PeV energy neutrino scattering rates , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 091301 [ 1905.03792]

2019 arXiv
[105]

Garcia, R

A. Garcia, R. Gauld, A. Heijboer and J. Rojo, Complete predictions for high-energy neutrino propagation in matter , JCAP 09 (2020) 025 [ 2004.04756]

2020 arXiv
[106]

Seckel, Neutrino photon reactions in astrophysics and cosmology , Phys

D. Seckel, Neutrino photon reactions in astrophysics and cosmology , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 900 [ hep-ph/9709290]

1998 arXiv
[107]

Alikhanov, Hidden Glashow resonance in neutrino–nucleus collisions , Phys

I. Alikhanov, Hidden Glashow resonance in neutrino–nucleus collisions , Phys. Lett. B 756 (2016) 247 [ 1503.08817]. – 18 –

2016 arXiv
[108]

Zhou and J.F

B. Zhou and J.F. Beacom, Neutrino-nucleus cross sections for W-boson and trident production, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 036011 [ 1910.08090]

2020 arXiv
[109]

Zhou and J.F

B. Zhou and J.F. Beacom, W-boson and trident production in TeV–PeV neutrino observatories, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 036010 [ 1910.10720]

2020 arXiv
[110]

Vincent, C.A

A.C. Vincent, C.A. Arg¨ uelles and A. Kheirandish, High-energy neutrino attenuation in the Earth and its associated uncertainties , JCAP 11 (2017) 012 [ 1706.09895]

2017 arXiv
[111]

Alvarez-Mu˜ niz, W.R

J. Alvarez-Mu˜ niz, W.R. Carvalho, A.L. Cummings, K. Payet, A. Romero-Wolf, H. Schoorlemmer et al., Comprehensive approach to tau-lepton production by high-energy tau neutrinos propagating through the Earth , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 023021 [ 1707.00334]

2018 arXiv
[112]

Garg et al., Neutrino propagation in the Earth and emerging charged leptons with nuPyProp, JCAP 01 (2023) 041 [ 2209.15581]

D. Garg et al., Neutrino propagation in the Earth and emerging charged leptons with nuPyProp, JCAP 01 (2023) 041 [ 2209.15581]

2023 arXiv
[113]

I. Safa, A. Pizzuto, C.A. Arg¨ uelles, F. Halzen, R. Hussain, A. Kheirandish et al., Observing EeV neutrinos through Earth: GZK and the anomalous ANITA events , JCAP 01 (2020) 012 [1909.10487]

2020 arXiv
[114]

I. Safa, J. Lazar, A. Pizzuto, O. Vasquez, C.A. Arg¨ uelles and J. Vandenbroucke, TauRunner: A public Python program to propagate neutral and charged leptons , Comput. Phys. Commun. 278 (2022) 108422 [ 2110.14662]

2022 arXiv
[115]

Bierlich et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3 , SciPost Phys

C. Bierlich et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3 , SciPost Phys. Codeb. 2022 (2022) 8 [ 2203.11601]

2022 arXiv
[116]

Stepanoff et al., Status of the Trinity PeV Neutrino Observatory , 2509.18236

S. Stepanoff et al., Status of the Trinity PeV Neutrino Observatory , 2509.18236
[117]

Krishnan, C.J

S. Krishnan, C.J. Crosby, V. Nandigam, M. Phan, C. Cowart, C. Baru et al., Opentopography: A services oriented architecture for community access to lidar topography , in Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research & Applications , (New ...

2011
[118]

Farr, P.A

T.G. Farr, P.A. Rosen, E. Caro, R. Crippen, R. Duren, S. Hensley et al., The shuttle radar topography mission, Reviews of Geophysics 45 (2007) [https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2005RG000183]

2007 doi
[119]

Abbasi et al., Improved Characterization of the Astrophysical Muon–neutrino Flux with 9.5 Years of IceCube Data, Astrophys

R. Abbasi et al., Improved Characterization of the Astrophysical Muon–neutrino Flux with 9.5 Years of IceCube Data, Astrophys. J. 928 (2022) 50 [ 2111.10299]

2022
[120]

IceCube collaboration, The IceCube high-energy starting event sample: Description and flux characterization with 7.5 years of data , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 022002 [ 2011.03545]

2021
[121]

ARA collaboration, Performance of two Askaryan Radio Array stations and first results in the search for ultrahigh energy neutrinos , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 082003 [ 1507.08991]

2016 arXiv
[122]

China Phys

GRAND collaboration, The Giant Radio Array for Neutrino Detection (GRAND): Science and Design , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 63 (2020) 219501 [ 1810.09994]

2020 arXiv
[123]

ANITA collaboration, Constraints on the ultrahigh-energy cosmic neutrino flux from the fourth flight of ANITA , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 122001 [ 1902.04005]

2019 arXiv
[124]

Space Res

ARIANNA collaboration, Targeting ultra-high energy neutrinos with the ARIANNA experiment, Adv. Space Res. 64 (2019) 2595 [ 1903.01609]

2019 arXiv
[125]

Pierre Augercollaboration, Probing the origin of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays with neutrinos in the EeV energy range using the Pierre Auger Observatory , JCAP 10 (2019) 022 [1906.07422]

2019 arXiv
[126]

Prohira et al., Observation of Radar Echoes From High-Energy Particle Cascades , Phys

S. Prohira et al., Observation of Radar Echoes From High-Energy Particle Cascades , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 091101 [ 1910.12830]

2020 arXiv
[127]

Wissel et al., Prospects for high-elevation radio detection of >100 PeV tau neutrinos , JCAP 11 (2020) 065 [ 2004.12718]

S. Wissel et al., Prospects for high-elevation radio detection of >100 PeV tau neutrinos , JCAP 11 (2020) 065 [ 2004.12718]. – 19 –

2020 arXiv
[128]

IceCube-Gen2 collaboration, IceCube-Gen2: the window to the extreme Universe , J. Phys. G 48 (2021) 060501 [ 2008.04323]

2021
[129]

PUEO collaboration, The Payload for Ultrahigh Energy Observations (PUEO): a white paper , JINST 16 (2021) P08035 [ 2010.02892]

2021 arXiv
[130]

RNO-G collaboration, Design and Sensitivity of the Radio Neutrino Observatory in Greenland (RNO-G), JINST 16 (2021) P03025 [ 2010.12279]

2021 arXiv
[131]

POEMMA collaboration, The POEMMA (Probe of Extreme Multi-Messenger Astrophysics) observatory, JCAP 06 (2021) 007 [ 2012.07945]

2021 arXiv
[132]

Dziewonski and D.L

A.M. Dziewonski and D.L. Anderson, Preliminary reference earth model, Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 25 (1981) 297

1981
[133]

Anchordoqui, H

L.A. Anchordoqui, H. Goldberg, F. Halzen and T.J. Weiler, Galactic point sources of TeV antineutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 593 (2004) 42 [ astro-ph/0311002]

2004 arXiv
[134]

Yasuda, N

K. Yasuda, N. Sakai, Y. Inoue and A. Kusenko, Neutrinos and Gamma Rays from Beta Decays in an Active Galactic Nucleus NGC 1068 Jet , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 151005 [2405.05247]

2025 arXiv
[135]

Esteban, M.C

I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J.P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz, NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations , JHEP 12 (2024) 216 [ 2410.05380]

2024 arXiv
[136]

NuFIT 6.1

“NuFIT 6.1.” http://www.nu-fit.org/?q=node/309, 2025

2025
[137]

Feldman and R.D

G.J. Feldman and R.D. Cousins, A Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals , Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 3873 [ physics/9711021]

1998 arXiv
[138]

Mucke, R

A. Mucke, R. Engel, J.P. Rachen, R.J. Protheroe and T. Stanev, SOPHIA: Monte Carlo simulations of photohadronic processes in astrophysics , Comput. Phys. Commun. 124 (2000) 290 [astro-ph/9903478]

2000 arXiv
[139]

W. Tian, S. Hao, I. Morton-Blake and D. Xu, Enhancing Neutrino Flavour Sensitivity in TRIDENT with Tau Neutrino Identification , PoS ICRC2025 (2025) 1195

2025
[140]

Skrzypek and S

B. Skrzypek and S. Klein, Measuring the Astrophysical Neutrino-Antineutrino Ratio with IceCube, PoS ICRC2025 (2025) 1181 [ 2508.02795]

2025 arXiv
[141]

Testagrossa, D.F.G

F. Testagrossa, D.F.G. Fiorillo and M. Bustamante, Two-detector flavor sensitivity to ultrahigh-energy cosmic neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 083026 [ 2310.12215]

2024 arXiv
[142]

Coleman, O

A. Coleman, O. Ericsson, C. Glaser and M. Bustamante, Flavor composition of ultrahigh-energy cosmic neutrinos: Measurement forecasts for in-ice radio-based EeV neutrino telescopes, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 023044 [ 2402.02432]. A Appendix At the PeV energy range which we want t...

2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

IceCube collaboration, Evidence for High-Energy Extraterrestrial Neutrinos at the IceCube Detector, Science 342 (2013) 1242856 [ 1311.5238]

arXiv 2013

[2] [2]

IceCube, Fermi-LAT, MAGIC, AGILE, ASAS-SN, HA WC, H.E.S.S., INTEGRAL, Kanata, Kiso, Kapteyn, Liverpool Telescope, Subaru, Swift NuSTAR, VERITAS, VLA/17B-403collaboration, Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A , Science 361 (2018) eaat1378 [1807.08816]

arXiv 2018

[3] [3]

IceCube collaboration, Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert , Science 361 (2018) 147 [ 1807.08794]

arXiv 2018

[4] [4]

IceCube collaboration, Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068, Science 378 (2022) 538 [ 2211.09972]. – 13 –

arXiv 2022

[5] [5]

IceCube collaboration, Observation of high-energy neutrinos from the Galactic plane , Science 380 (2023) adc9818 [ 2307.04427]

arXiv 2023

[6] [6]

O. Mena, S. Palomares-Ruiz and A.C. Vincent, Flavor Composition of the High-Energy Neutrino Events in IceCube , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 091103 [ 1404.0017]

arXiv 2014

[7] [7]

Palomares-Ruiz, A.C

S. Palomares-Ruiz, A.C. Vincent and O. Mena, Spectral analysis of the high-energy IceCube neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 103008 [ 1502.02649]

arXiv 2015

[8] [8]

IceCube collaboration, Flavor Ratio of Astrophysical Neutrinos above 35 TeV in IceCube , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 171102 [ 1502.03376]

arXiv 2015