REVIEW 1 cited by
Systematic Mapping of Monolithic Applications to Microservices Architecture
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The aim of this paper to provide the solution microservices architecture as a popular alternative to monolithic architecture. It discusses the advantages of microservices and the challenges that organizations face when transitioning from a monolithic system. It presents a case study of a financial application and proposed techniques for identifying microservices on monolithic systems using domain-driven development concepts. In recent years, microservices architecture has emerged as a new architectural style in the software development industry. As legacy monolithic software becomes too large to manage, many large corporations are considering converting their traditional monolithic systems into small-scale, self-contained microservices. However, migrating from monolithic to microservices architecture is a difficult and challenging task. It presents a comparison of the two architectural styles and discusses the difficulties that led companies to switch to microservices. The study's findings suggest that the proposed technique can improve work performance and establish clear models, but it may not be useful for systems with lower levels of complexity. This research paper has practical implications for software architects and developers who are considering migrating from monolithic to microservices architecture.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Extracting Overlapping Microservices from Monolithic Code via Deep Semantic Embeddings and Graph Neural Network-Based Soft Clustering
Mo2oM assigns classes to overlapping microservices using UniXcoder embeddings and NOCD soft clustering, claiming large gains in modularity metrics over hard-clustering baselines on four monoliths.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.