Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 48 references

Permutahedra, Lusztig varieties, degenerations, and subdivisions

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Lusztig varieties degenerate to unions of Richardson varieties, subdividing the permutahedron into Bruhat-interval polytopes that are regular in types A, B and C.

desk verdict Solid geometric unification of three known results via a non-Gröbner degeneration, plus a general subdivision theorem and explicit regularity in ABC. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.02701 v1 pith:TNMN77YL submitted 2026-07-02 math.AG math.CO

Allen Knutson , Mario Sanchez , Melissa Sherman-Bennett This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGmath.CO MSC 14M1514N1552B2005E14
keywords LusztigvarietiesRichardsonpermutahedronBruhatintervalpolytopesequivariantdegenerationregularsubdivisionHessenbergflagDressian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs an embedded, torus-equivariant flat degeneration of any regular-semisimple Lusztig variety inside the flag variety into a reduced union of Richardson varieties. When the Lusztig variety is the permutahedral toric variety, the special fibre is a union of toric Richardson varieties whose moment polytopes form a subdivision of the W-permutahedron into Bruhat-interval polytopes. The same degeneration simultaneously recovers and extends known cohomology-class formulae for permutahedral and Hessenberg varieties. Although the degeneration is not Gröbner, the resulting subdivisions of the permutahedron are nevertheless regular in types A, B and C, via explicit height functions inspired by total positivity. The geometric argument also yields a general fact: any equivariant degeneration of a projective toric variety produces a polyhedral subdivision of its moment polytope.

What carries the argument

The double-Schubert degeneration of Proposition 2.4, intersected fibrewise with a general translate of the diagonal Schubert variety, produces a flat family whose special fibre is the desired union of Richardson varieties; Duistermaat–Heckman measures then convert the geometric degeneration into a polyhedral subdivision of the moment polytope.

What would settle it

Exhibit a Coxeter element c and a regular-semisimple t for which the intersection of the double-Schubert special fibre with (t,1)Ω_e fails to be equidimensional or Cohen–Macaulay, or compute the height function of Definition 5.6 on a type-A permutahedron and check that a lifted facet lies strictly below a neighbouring facet.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For t general in the torus there is an embedded flat T-equivariant degeneration of the Lusztig variety Y_w(t) to the reduced union of all Richardson varieties X^{u w^{-1}}_u with u w^{-1} length-additive; when w is a Coxeter element this specialises to a finest Bruhat-interval subdivision of the W-permutahedron that is regular in types A, B and C.

Load-bearing premise

Flatness of the restricted family at the special fibre rests on Kleiman transversality (characteristic zero) together with the Cohen–Macaulay property of the special fibre of the double-Schubert family; if either fails, the class formulae and the polytope subdivision do not follow.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs an embedded T-equivariant flat degeneration of a regular semisimple Lusztig variety Y_w(t) inside G/B to the reduced union of Richardson varieties X^{u w^{-1}}_u over length-additive products uw^{-1} (Theorem A / Theorem 2.10). The construction intersects a known flat family of double Schubert varieties (Proposition 2.4) with a transverse translate (t,1)Ω_e and projects; flatness is verified by K-class equality (Proposition 2.1) using transversality and Cohen–Macaulayness of the special fibre. Specialising to Coxeter elements yields a finest Bruhat-interval subdivision of the W-permutahedron (Theorem C / Theorem 4.4). A general result (Theorem 3.1) shows that any T-equivariant embedded semitoric degeneration of a projective toric variety produces a polyhedral subdivision of the moment polytope via Duistermaat–Heckman measures and Zariski’s main theorem. Explicit height functions (rightmost subexpressions / lattice-path weights) prove the subdivisions are regular in types A, B and C.

Significance. The work unifies and extends cohomology-class formulae of Anderson–Tymoczko, Harada–Horiguchi–Masuda–Park and Kim by a single geometric degeneration, while supplying a non-Gröbner source of Bruhat-interval subdivisions of Coxeter permutahedra. Theorem 3.1 is of independent interest: it removes the Gröbner hypothesis from the classical Sturmfels correspondence between toric degenerations and polytope subdivisions. The regularity proofs give concrete maximal cones in the positive flag Dressian (at least 2^{n-2} in type A) and an explicit height function that realises them. The arguments rely only on standard tools (flatness, equivariant K-theory, moment maps) and previously established properties of double Schubert varieties; no free parameters or circular definitions appear.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract / §1.1] In the abstract and introduction the degeneration is said to give a “subdivision”, while Theorem 1.1 (quoted from HHMP) only claims a dissection; the upgrade to a genuine subdivision is proved only later in Theorem 3.1. A one-sentence forward pointer would avoid temporary confusion.
  2. [§2, Proposition 2.1] Proposition 2.1 asserts that equal A_*-classes plus reduced equidimensional fibres imply flatness; the short proof is correct but could cite the precise reference (e.g., the relevant lemma in [KM05] or [AK10]) for readers less familiar with the Hilbert-polynomial argument.
  3. [§5.3] The lattice-path description of the height function (Proposition 5.18 and Figures 2–4) is clear, yet the dependence of the sequence of corners r_i on the excedance set of c is stated only after the figures; moving the definition of r_i earlier would help the reader follow the weight calculation.
  4. [§2.4] Conjecture 2.14 on the K-class is left open outside the Coxeter case; a brief remark on whether the same Möbius function can be read off from the totally nonnegative flag variety (already mentioned in Remark 2.16) would clarify the expected next step.
  5. [Throughout] A few typographical inconsistencies appear: “Gröbner” vs. “Gr"obner”, and the occasional missing space before a citation. These are purely cosmetic.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; all load-bearing steps are independent derivations from external citations, standard tools (flatness/K-theory/DH measures/Zariski), or direct combinatorial verification of height functions.

full rationale

The central degeneration (Thm 2.10/A) is obtained by fiberwise intersection of the external double-Schubert family of Prop 2.4 ([UG25], non-overlapping authors) with (t,1)Ω_e, followed by projection; flatness at 0/1 follows from Prop 2.1 via K-class equality (transversality by Kleiman + CM of the special fibre already established in the citation) and is not defined in terms of the target classes or polytopes. The general subdivision theorem (Thm 3.1) is proved from scratch via Duistermaat–Heckman measures, GIT quotients, and Zariski’s main theorem (Cor 2.3), without assuming the conclusion. For Coxeter elements the Bruhat-interval subdivision (Thm 4.4/C) is then immediate from the degeneration + Thm 3.1 + Lem 4.3. Regularity in types A/B/C is verified directly: the height functions h_c (Def 5.6/6.1) are defined combinatorially from rightmost subexpressions/weights of lattice paths, then shown to satisfy the external coplanarity + local-folding criteria of Thm 5.3 ([DLRS10]) by explicit incline calculations (Props 5.11/5.13/5.21 and Lem 5.20). The only self-citation ([Knu09] for the Möbius formula on the union) is used solely for the optional K-class refinement and is not load-bearing for the degeneration, cohomology formulae, or polytope subdivision. No quantity is fitted, redefined in terms of the output, or forced by an author-unique uniqueness theorem; the paper is self-contained against its external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Pure-mathematics paper; no free parameters fitted to data. Background axioms are standard results in algebraic geometry and Coxeter combinatorics. The only essentially new combinatorial objects are the height functions h_c (and their lattice-path reformulation) used to prove regularity; they are defined explicitly and verified by direct coplanarity/local-folding checks, so they carry independent combinatorial evidence.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Kleiman transversality (char 0) guarantees that (t,1)Ω_e ∩ Ω_w is transverse for general t∈T
    Invoked in Lemma 2.5 and the flatness argument of Theorem 2.10 to obtain the correct K-class of the general fibre.
  • standard math Zariski’s main theorem (and its corollary on connectedness of fibres of proper maps with connected general fibre)
    Used in Corollary 2.3 and repeatedly in the proof of Theorem 3.1 to upgrade dissections to subdivisions and to control intersections of components.
  • domain assumption The special fibre of the double-Schubert family of Proposition 2.4 is reduced and Cohen–Macaulay
    Cited from UG25; needed so that K-classes multiply under proper intersection and so that the projected family remains flat.
  • standard math Duistermaat–Heckman measure of a projective toric variety is Lebesgue measure on its moment polytope
    Standard fact used throughout §3 to convert equality of DH measures into covering and non-overlapping of polytopes.
invented entities (1)
  • height function h_c on vertices of the permutahedron (via rightmost subexpressions / lattice-path weights) independent evidence
    purpose: to prove that the Bruhat-interval subdivision of Theorem 4.4 is regular in types A,B,C
    Defined combinatorially from a reduced word for the Coxeter element; verified by direct coplanarity and local-folding arguments. Independent combinatorial evidence exists (it realises maximal cones of the positive flag Dressian).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Permutahedra, Lusztig varieties, degenerations, and subdivisions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TNMN77YL

@misc{pith2026260702701,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Permutahedra, Lusztig varieties, degenerations, and subdivisions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TNMN77YL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.02701}
}
abstract

We present an embedded (in $G/B$) degeneration of Lusztig varieties (which generalize type $A$ Hessenberg varieties) to certain unions of Richardson varieties, giving a simultaneous reproof (and extension) of results of Anderson--Tymoczko, Harada--Horiguchi--Masuda--Park, and Kim. Although torus-equivariant, the degeneration is not Gr\"obner. In the case that the Lusztig variety is the permutahedral toric variety, this degeneration provides a subdivision of the permutahedron into Bruhat interval polytopes, and we prove a more general result showing equivariant degenerations of projective toric varieties produce subdivisions of the moment polytope (as was shown in the Gr\"obner case by Sturmfels). A Gr\"obner degeneration would result in a {\em regular} subdivision, and despite our degeneration not being Gr\"obner we show in types $A,B,C$ that our subdivisions of the permutahedron are indeed regular.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02701 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A dissection that isn’t a subdivision, and a subdivision that isn’t regular. measure on t ∗ R as a weak limit of Dirac measures: (1) DH(X,L) ∶= limn→∞ 1 ndim X ∑ λ∈ 1 n T ∗ dimF(nλ weight space in Γ(X; L ⊗n )) δλ If there are multiple tori at play, we sometimes write DHT (X,L) to include the torus in the notation. Lemma 3.9. Assuming X is reduced, the sum in (1) (even before taking the limit) can be restricted to λ … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Grid(5), with upper right corners marked with dots, and lower left corners marked with diamonds. The numbers inside boxes indicate their content. In bold, the path L (1,−1) I for I = {2, 4, 5}. First, if ℓ(q)−ℓ(p) = 1, there is nothing to prove. If ℓ(q)−ℓ(p) = 2, then by Lemma 5.12, we have q = tx tp tq = x p Suppose C contains tp (the other case is identical). We have λa − λb λn+1 = inc(p, t) = inc(x, t) where the … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: The ribbon strip ribc for c = s6s5s4s2s7s3s1 = 31724586 in Grid(8). The excedance set of c is I = {1, 3, 7}, and LI is the lower boundary of ribc. Boxes of ribc are filled with their content. Center: The wiring diagram for c obtained by placing a “cross” in each box of ribc and rotating 45○ counterclockwise. Right: A standard Young tableau T of shape ribc, and the corresponding reduced expression wT for c unde… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: The sequence of upper right corners r1, . . . , r7 for c = 31724586. In black, the ribbon ribc. Shaded in blue, the skew shape ν r4 2478. Boxes are filled with their content. The lower right corner box of ν r4 2478 is the unique box of ribc of content 4. By Lemma…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: On the left, the Hasse diagram of ≽c when c = s5s7s6s1s2s4s3 = 23614857. On the right, the general shape of the Hasse diagram of ≽c, which is a zig-zag (in blue) with claws attached to the peaks and valleys. The numbers a1, . . . , ar are arbitrary nonnegative integers…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Positive configuration space

    Nima Arkani-Hamed, Thomas Lam, and Marcus Spradlin. Positive configuration space. Comm. Math. Phys. , 384(2):909--954, 2021

    2021

  2. [2]

    Complete moduli spaces of branchvarieties

    Valery Alexeev and Allen Knutson. Complete moduli spaces of branchvarieties. Journal f \"u r die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik , 2010(639), 2010

    2010

  3. [3]

    Schubert polynomials and classes of H essenberg varieties

    Dave Anderson and Julianna Tymoczko. Schubert polynomials and classes of H essenberg varieties. Journal of Algebra , 323, 2010

    2010

  4. [4]

    On computing the number of linear extensions of a tree

    Mike D Atkinson. On computing the number of linear extensions of a tree. Order , 7(1):23--25, 1990

    1990

  5. [5]

    Combinatorics of C oxeter groups , volume 231 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics

    Anders Bj\"orner and Francesco Brenti. Combinatorics of C oxeter groups , volume 231 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer, New York, 2005

    2005

  6. [6]

    Persistent subdivisions of C oxeter permutahedra

    Timothy Blanton, Jes\' u s De Loera, and Melissa Sherman-Bennett. Persistent subdivisions of C oxeter permutahedra. arXiv:2606.28680 , 2026

    arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Polyhedral and tropical geometry of flag positroids

    Jonathan Boretsky, Christopher Eur, and Lauren Williams. Polyhedral and tropical geometry of flag positroids. Algebra Number Theory , 18(7):1333--1374, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    I. N. Bernstein, I. M. Gel ' fand, and S. I. Gel ' fand. Schubert cells and the cohomology of a flag space. Funkcional. Anal. i Prilo zen. , 7(1):64--65, 1973

    1973

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    The C oxeter flag variety, 2026

    Nantel Bergeron, Lucas Gagnon, Hunter Spink, and Vasu Tewari. The C oxeter flag variety, 2026

    2026

  2. [10]

    Geometry of regular semisimple L usztig varieties

    Patrick Brosnan, Jaehyun Hong, and Donggun Lee. Geometry of regular semisimple L usztig varieties. Preprint, arXiv:2504.15868 , 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    The M irkovi \'c -- V ilonen basis and D uistermaat-- H eckman measures

    Pierre Baumann, Joel Kamnitzer, and Allen Knutson. The M irkovi \'c -- V ilonen basis and D uistermaat-- H eckman measures. Acta Mathematica , 227(1):1--101, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Affine M irkovi\'c- V ilonen polytopes

    Pierre Baumann, Joel Kamnitzer, and Peter Tingley. Affine M irkovi\'c- V ilonen polytopes. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes \'Etudes Sci. , 120:113--205, 2014

    2014

  5. [13]

    Totally nonnegative tropical flags and the totally nonnegative flag D ressian

    Jonathan Boretsky. Totally nonnegative tropical flags and the totally nonnegative flag D ressian. arXiv:2208.09128 , 2023. preprint

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Action d’un tore dans une variet \'e projective

    M Brion and C Procesi. Action d’un tore dans une variet \'e projective. O perator A lgebras, U nitary R epresentations, E nveloping A lgebras, and I nvariant T heory. E nglish translation at https://translations.thosgood.net/PiM-92-1990-509.pdf. Progress in Mathematics , 93, 1990

    1990

  7. [15]

    Bruhat order of C oxeter groups and shellability

    Anders Bj\"orner and Michelle Wachs. Bruhat order of C oxeter groups and shellability. Adv. in Math. , 43(1):87--100, 1982

    1982

  8. [16]

    Variation of geometric invariant theory quotients

    Igor V Dolgachev and Yi Hu. Variation of geometric invariant theory quotients. Publications Math \'e matiques de l'Institut des Hautes \'E tudes Scientifiques , 87(1):5--51, 1998

    1998

  9. [17]

    De Loera, J

    J. De Loera, J. Rambau, and F. Santos. Triangulations: Structures for algorithms and applications . Algorithms and Computation in Mathematics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010

    2010

  10. [18]

    Equivariant intersection theory (with an appendix by A ngelo V istoli: The C how ring of M_2 )

    Dan Edidin and William Graham. Equivariant intersection theory (with an appendix by A ngelo V istoli: The C how ring of M_2 ). Inventiones Mathematicae , 131(3):595--634, 1998

    1998

  11. [19]

    Intersection theory , volume 2

    William Fulton. Intersection theory , volume 2. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  12. [20]

    Karp, and Thomas Lam

    Pavel Galashin, Steven N. Karp, and Thomas Lam. Regularity theorem for totally nonnegative flag varieties. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 35(2):513--579, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Symplectic fibrations and multiplicity diagrams

    Victor Guillemin, Eugene Lerman, and Shlomo Sternberg. Symplectic fibrations and multiplicity diagrams . Cambridge University Press, 1996

    1996

  14. [22]

    Gruber and Sergej S

    Peter M. Gruber and Sergej S. Ryškov. Facet-to-facet implies face-to-face. European Journal of Combinatorics , 10(1):83--84, 1989

    1989

  15. [23]

    Megumi Harada, Andr\'e Henriques, and Tara S. Holm. Computation of generalized equivariant cohomologies of K ac- M oody flag varieties. Adv. Math. , 197(1):198--221, 2005

    2005

  16. [24]

    The volume polynomial of regular semisimple H essenberg varieties and the G elfand-- Z etlin polytope

    Megumi Harada, Tatsuya Horiguchi, Mikiya Masuda, and Seonjeong Park. The volume polynomial of regular semisimple H essenberg varieties and the G elfand-- Z etlin polytope. Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics , 305, 2019

    2019

  17. [25]

    Rota's conjecture and positivity of algebraic cycles in permutohedral varieties

    June Huh. Rota's conjecture and positivity of algebraic cycles in permutohedral varieties . PhD thesis, University of Michigan, 2014

    2014

  18. [26]

    Generalized permutahedra and positive flag D ressians

    Michael Joswig, Georg Loho, Dante Luber, and Jorge Alberto Olarte. Generalized permutahedra and positive flag D ressians. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (19):16748--16777, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    M. M. Kapranov. Chow quotients of G rassmannians. I . In I. M . G el ' fand S eminar , volume 16, Part 2 of Adv. Soviet Math. , pages 29--110. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1993

    1993

  20. [28]

    Homology class of a D eligne- L usztig variety and its analogues

    Dongkwan Kim. Homology class of a D eligne- L usztig variety and its analogues. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (4):1246--1280, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    Gr \"o bner geometry of S chubert polynomials

    Allen Knutson and Ezra Miller. Gr \"o bner geometry of S chubert polynomials. Annals of Mathematics , pages 1245--1318, 2005

    2005

  22. [30]

    Frobenius splitting and M \"obius inversion

    Allen Knutson. Frobenius splitting and M \"obius inversion. arXiv:0902.1930 , 2009

    1930 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Decompositions of normal algebraic varieties determined by an action of a one-dimensional torus

    Jerzy Konarski. Decompositions of normal algebraic varieties determined by an action of a one-dimensional torus. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S\'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys. , 26(4):295--300, 1978

    1978

  24. [32]

    The full K ostant- T oda hierarchy on the positive flag variety

    Yuji Kodama and Lauren Williams. The full K ostant- T oda hierarchy on the positive flag variety. Comm. Math. Phys. , 335(1):247--283, 2015

    2015

  25. [33]

    The HHMP decomposition of the permutohedron and degenerations of torus orbits in flag varieties

    Carl Lian. The HHMP decomposition of the permutohedron and degenerations of torus orbits in flag varieties . International Mathematics Research Notices , 09 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    The geometry and combinatorics of some H essenberg varieties related to the permutohedral variety

    Jan-Li Lin. The geometry and combinatorics of some H essenberg varieties related to the permutohedral variety. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics , pages P3--17, 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    New moduli spaces of pointed curves and pencils of flat connections

    Andrey Losev and Yuri Manin. New moduli spaces of pointed curves and pencils of flat connections. Michigan Mathematical Journal , 48(1):443--472, 2000

    2000

  28. [36]

    Williams

    Tomasz ukowski, Matteo Parisi, and Lauren K. Williams. The positive tropical G rassmannian, the hypersimplex, and the m=2 amplituhedron. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (19):16778--16836, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    G. Lusztig. On the reflection representation of a finite C hevalley group. In Representation theory of L ie groups , pages 325--337. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1979

    1979

  30. [38]

    Towards a mathematical definition of C oulomb branches of 3-dimensional N=4 gauge theories, I

    Hiraku Nakajima. Towards a mathematical definition of C oulomb branches of 3-dimensional N=4 gauge theories, I . Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 20(3):595--669, 2016

    2016

  31. [39]

    Richard P. Stanley. Enumerative combinatorics. V ol. 1 , volume 49 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997. With a foreword by Gian-Carlo Rota, Corrected reprint of the 1986 original

    1997

  32. [40]

    Folding by automorphisms

    John Stembridge. Folding by automorphisms. https://dept.math.lsa.umich.edu/\

  33. [41]

    Gr \"o bner bases of toric varieties

    Bernd Sturmfels. Gr \"o bner bases of toric varieties. Tohoku Mathematical Journal, Second Series , 43(2):249--261, 1991

    1991

  34. [42]

    Williams

    David Speyer and Lauren K. Williams. The positive D ressian equals the positive tropical G rassmannian. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B , 8:330--353, 2021

    2021

  35. [43]

    Examples of non- K\"a hler H amiltonian torus actions

    Susan Tolman. Examples of non- K\"a hler H amiltonian torus actions. Inventiones mathematicae , 131(2):299--310, 1998

    1998

  36. [44]

    Tsukerman and L

    E. Tsukerman and L. Williams. Bruhat interval polytopes. Adv. Math. , 285:766--810, 2015

    2015

  37. [45]

    A degeneration of the brick variety and a mixed subdivision of the associahedron into cubes

    Gabe Udell and Raj Gandhi. A degeneration of the brick variety and a mixed subdivision of the associahedron into cubes. Preprint , 2025

    2025

  38. [46]

    Schubert induction

    Ravi Vakil. Schubert induction. Ann. of Math. (2) , 164(2):489--512, 2006

    2006

  39. [47]

    Goresky- M ac P herson calculus for the affine flag varieties

    Zhiwei Yun. Goresky- M ac P herson calculus for the affine flag varieties. Canad. J. Math. , 62(2):473--480, 2010

    2010

  40. [48]

    Degenerations of toric ideals and toric varieties

    Chun-Gang Zhu. Degenerations of toric ideals and toric varieties. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 386(2):613--618, 2012

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.