Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 89 references

Extended analysis of distillation and purification of squeezed states of light

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Displaced two-photon subtraction can distill arbitrarily strong squeezing from any squeezed vacuum, and a Fock-state filter can purify mixed states of light.

desk verdict Solid theory for a universal squeezing boost, but the mixed-state purification claim leans on a Gaussification theorem it does not prove. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00467 v1 pith:TPABXAQB submitted 2025-02-01 quant-ph

Jaromír Fiurášek , Stephan Grebien , Roman Schnabel This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords squeezedstatesphotonsubtractionheraldedGaussificationsqueezingdistillationquantumpurificationFock-statefilterGottesman-Kitaev-Preskillcontinuous-variableinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Squeezed light is the working resource for precision sensing and continuous-variable quantum information, but passive optics cannot increase its squeezing. This paper argues that a conditional operation—subtracting two photons with a carefully chosen coherent displacement—converts any pure squeezed vacuum into a tunable superposition of vacuum and two-photon states, and that subsequent heralded Gaussification can then produce a Gaussian state with any target squeezing, however strong. For imperfect, lossy inputs, the same subtraction route cannot remove the loss; the paper proposes instead a Fock filter that deletes the single-photon component, after which Gaussification should converge to a pure squeezed vacuum. If these claims hold, squeezing can be amplified and purified without building a stronger source, which matters for gravitational-wave detectors, quantum communication, and fault-tolerant optical computing.

What carries the argument

The central object is the modified two-photon subtraction operator $\hat{M}$, a displaced photon-subtraction pair that preserves Fock parity, together with the heralded Gaussification step. $\hat{M}$ prepares the tunable squeezed superposition; the Gaussification step's fixed point is controlled by Eq. (10), and Eq. (11) supplies the displacement that targets any requested $r_G$. The purification protocol replaces $\hat{M}$ by the Fock filter $\hat{F}_1=\hat{n}-1$, which zeroes the single-photon row and column of the density matrix; the convergence theorem for even-parity states then determines the purified state.

What would settle it

Take a squeezed vacuum with $r<1/2$, implement $\hat{M}$ with $\delta^2$ from Eq. (11) for a target $r_G \gg r$, and iterate the heralded Gaussification while tracking the quadrature variances: if the sequence does not converge to the Gaussian state with $\tanh r_G$ (or diverges), the arbitrary-strength claim fails. For the purification claim, feed a known lossy squeezed state through a photon-catalysis realization of $\hat{n}-1$ followed by Gaussification and measure the output purity: a purity below the predicted value (or a converged squeeze parameter different from $\sqrt{2}|\sigma^F_{2,0}|$) would refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the parity-preserving operation $\hat{M}=(\hat{a}+\delta)(\hat{a}-\delta)=\hat{a}^2-\delta^2$ turns any pure squeezed vacuum into a squeezed superposition of vacuum and two-photon Fock states, with the ratio of the two components set by the displacement $\delta$. Because iterative heralded Gaussification preserves that ratio, the final Gaussian squeeze parameter obeys $\tanh r_G=(3\tanh r-\delta^2)/(\tanh r-\delta^2\tanh r)$; inverting this relation gives a closed-form $\delta^2$ for every target $r_G>r$, so arbitrary strong squeezing is reachable from arbitrarily weak input squeezing. For mixed inputs, the paper shows that the loss channel commutes through the modified subtraction, so squeezing gains cannot remove loss; the alternative Fock filter $\hat{F}_1=\hat{n}-1$ removes the single-photon component, and the Gaussification convergence theory then predicts a pure squeezed vacuum whose squeeze parameter is $\sqrt{2}|\sigma^F_{2,0}|$, making simultaneous distillation and purification possible for a large class of states.

Load-bearing premise

Both headline results assume that the iterative Gaussification convergence theorem—that mixing two copies at a balanced beam splitter and heralding vacuum drives any even-parity state to a Gaussian squeezed vacuum whose parameter is set by the vacuum and two-photon amplitudes—applies to the specific states generated here; if that theorem fails for these states, or if the Fock filter cannot remove the one-photon component cleanly, the claims collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any non-zero pure squeezed vacuum can be upgraded to any target squeeze parameter by the displaced two-photon subtraction followed by Gaussification; the required displacement is given in closed form by Eq. (11).
  • The single-round protocol (without Gaussification) increases the squeeze factor by a fixed factor $\approx 1.82$ ($\approx 2.6$ dB) for any input squeezing, provided the displacement is optimized.
  • Losses imprinted on the input cannot be undone by two-photon subtraction plus Gaussification: the squeezed variance after the whole procedure is bounded below by $(V_X V_Y - 1)/(V_X + V_Y - 2)$.
  • A Fock filter that removes the one-photon component, followed by Gaussification, yields a pure squeezed vacuum from any mixed input with non-vanishing vacuum–two-photon coherence and $|\sigma^F_{2,0}| < 1/\sqrt{2}$; this works even for coherent states.
  • The distilled states are squeezed superpositions of $|0\rangle$ and $|2\rangle$, the same family used in recent approximate Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) state breeding, so the squeezing-distillation setup doubles as a GKP-state generator.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because Eq. (11) writes the required displacement as a closed-form function of input and target squeeze parameters, the protocol is in effect a tunable single-mode squeezer: one can dial the output squeezing by setting $\delta$, which may be simpler than changing the pump power of an optical parametric amplifier.
  • The distilled states are exactly the squeezed $c_0|0\rangle + c_2|2\rangle$ superpositions used in approximate GKP breeding, so a single setup could serve both squeezing distillation and GKP-state generation by changing the heralding condition; the paper notes the kinship but stops short of proposing such a combined architecture.
  • A natural stress test is to include realistic detector efficiency and dark counts in the success-probability optimization; the paper's back-propagation treatment of efficiency gives the ingredients, and one could tabulate optimized $T$ and $\alpha$ for current superconducting detectors.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper extends the protocol for squeezing distillation by two-photon subtraction, replacing the bare operation a^2 with a parity-preserving combination (a+δ)(a−δ)=a^2−δ^2. Section II derives the resulting squeezed superposition of vacuum and two-photon states, gives closed-form quadrature variances, and shows that a suitable choice of δ^2 allows iterative heralded Gaussification to converge to a squeezed vacuum with any target squeeze parameter r_G>r for any nonzero input r. Section III analyzes a beam-splitter implementation and optimizes the success probability. Section IV connects the generated states to approximate GKP states, Section V analyzes local photon subtraction from two-mode squeezed vacuum states, and Section VI proves a no-loss-suppression result for photon subtraction plus Gaussification and proposes a Fock filter F1=n−1 followed by Gaussification to distill pure squeezed vacuum states from mixed inputs.

Significance. The pure-state part of the paper is clean and explicit: the derivations of Eqs. (4), (7), (10), and (11) are self-contained, involve no fitted parameters, and make concrete, testable predictions about variances and success probabilities. The loss-commutation identities in Section VI are a useful and clearly presented contribution. The Section VI purification claim, if substantiated, is the most significant result because it would show that a single non-Gaussian filter followed by iterative Gaussification can simultaneously distill squeezing and restore purity from a large class of mixed states. The paper is generally well written and credits the relevant prior work, including the experimental demonstration in Ref. [38]. The main weakness is that the purification claim currently rests on an imported Gaussification convergence theorem whose hypotheses are not stated precisely, and no derivation or numerical verification is given for the filtered states to which it is applied.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section VI, Eq. (38)] The purification claim rests on applying the Gaussification convergence theorem to the filtered state F1 ρ F1†. The only convergence theorem stated in the paper, in Section II before Eq. (10), is for pure input states that are superpositions of even Fock states. After F1 is applied to a generic mixed input, the density matrix still has nonzero elements such as ρF_{3,0}, ρF_{3,2}, and ρF_{3,3}, and it is generally mixed. The sentence 'The theory of iterative Gaussification procedure [63,64] then predicts...' therefore invokes the imported result outside the domain that has been stated, and no derivation or numerical check is supplied for the convergence to a pure squeezed vacuum with tanh r = sqrt(2)|σF_{2,0}|. Because this step carries the abstract's simultaneous-distillation-and-purification claim, the manuscript should either state the precise hypotheses of [63,64] and prove that F1-filtered states satisfy them, or provide a self-contained convergence analysis (analytical or numerical) for the filtered state.
  2. [Section VI, Eq. (38)] The bound (38) is obtained by combining the commutation identity (36) with the sentence 'Gaussification of a mixed state L_T0(ψ) is equivalent to Gaussification of a pure state ψ with detectors whose efficiency is reduced by T0, followed by transmission of the Gaussified state through L_T0.' This equivalence is asserted rather than derived; it is not an immediate consequence of Eq. (36), since the Gaussification map involves two copies, a balanced beam splitter, and a vacuum projection. If the equivalence is standard, a short derivation or a precise reference to the statement in [63,64] (or [81,82]) should be given. Without it, the no-loss-suppression result is not fully established.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section III] In the third paragraph of Section III, 'perfromed' should be 'performed'.
  2. [Section III] In the paragraph after Eq. (18), 'transmittace' should be 'transmittance'.
  3. [Section VII] In the conclusions, 'onutput' should be 'output' and 'succes' should be 'success'.
  4. [Section II, Eq. (11)] Since δ is complex, negative values of δ² are physically allowed with imaginary δ; a sentence making this explicit would prevent confusion after the statement 'we focus on the case of real δ²'.
  5. [Section VI] The definition σF_{2,0} = ρF_{2,0}/ρF_{0,0} requires ρF_{0,0} ≠ 0; the text should state this non-degeneracy condition explicitly.
  6. [Fig. 3] Panel (c) is labeled α² but the caption says 'the optimal coherent displacement α'; please specify explicitly that the squared amplitude is plotted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central squeezing-distillation and purification claims derive from operator algebra plus an external Gaussification theorem; self-citations appear only as prior art and are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain in Section II is self-contained: Eq. (4) follows by direct application of M = a^2 - delta^2 to the squeezed-vacuum expansion (1); Eqs. (5)-(7) are the corresponding variance minimization, with delta^2 a free control parameter rather than a fitted constant. Eq. (10) is the fixed-point condition of the Gaussification theorem imported from the independent works [63,64], and Eq. (11) is an algebraic inversion of Eq. (10); choosing delta^2 to target r_G is a control choice, not a fit renamed as a prediction. Section VI likewise invokes the same external theorem, stating the relevant filtered coherence sigma^F_{2,0}; the Fock filter F1 = n - 1 is defined explicitly and its effect on Fock-basis elements is written out. The self-citations [22,38,82] are used as prior art or for experimental context and are not the source of the central convergence claim. The only notable risk is that the application of [63,64] to mixed states with residual odd Fock components (e.g., |3>, |5>) may go beyond the theorem's stated even-parity pure-state hypotheses; that is a correctness or support concern, not a circularity, because the theorem is external and parameter-free. There is no fitted parameter that is later relabeled as an output and no load-bearing self-citation chain. The score of 2 reflects minor self-citations that are not load-bearing rather than any circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on two cited theoretical pillars: the iterative Gaussification convergence theorem and the single-photon-catalysis implementation of the Fock filter. No hidden numerical parameters are fitted; delta and the beam-splitter transmittance T are controllable experimental knobs. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Iterative heralded Gaussification of parity-even pure states converges to a Gaussian squeezed vacuum whose squeeze parameter is determined by the ratio of the vacuum and two-photon Fock amplitudes.
    Invoked in Section II for Eq. (10) and in Section VI for the Fock-filter purification protocol; based on Refs. [63,64], not re-derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption The Fock-state filter F1 = n - 1 can be implemented exactly by single-photon catalysis, removing only the single-photon component.
    Used in Section VI to argue that Gaussification after filtering yields a pure squeezed vacuum; implementation cited to Refs. [84,85], with ideal lossless operation assumed.
  • domain assumption Coherent displacement of the tapped mode can implement the operation a + delta with arbitrary complex delta, so any real value of delta^2 is experimentally accessible.
    Underlies Eq. (2) and the generality of Eq. (3); standard quantum-optics result, assumed ideal in the analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Extended analysis of distillation and purification of squeezed states of light." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TPABXAQB

@misc{pith2026250200467,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Extended analysis of distillation and purification of squeezed states of light},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TPABXAQB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00467}
}
read the original abstract

Squeezed states of light are one of the most important fundamental resources for quantum optics, optical quantum information processing and quantum sensing. Recently, it has been experimentally demonstrated that the squeezing of single-mode squeezed vacuum states can be enhanced by probabilistic two-photon subtraction. A further enhancement of the squeezing is subsequently possible by heralded Gaussification that distills a Gaussian state from the de-Gaussified two-photon subtracted state. Here we provide an extended theoretical analysis of squeezing distillation and purification. We consider a more general scheme in which photon subtraction is combined with a weak coherent displacement. This more flexible scheme allows to enhance squeezing for arbitrary input squeezing value. Moreover, if the modified two-photon subtraction operation is properly chosen, then arbitrary strong squeezing can be distilled by subsequent Gaussification. We go beyond pure states and show that the combination of photon subtraction and heralded Gaussification cannot suppress losses that have affected the input state. To overcome this limitation, we propose an alternative de-Gaussifying operation based on a Fock-state filter that removes the single-photon state. With this de-Gaussifying operation and subsequent re-Gaussification, pure single-mode squeezed states can be distilled from a large class of mixed input states. Interestingly, we have found that squeezing distillation by two-photon subtraction is closely related to certain methods for generating Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states, which are crucial for optical quantum computing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.00467 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Squeezing distillation by extended two-photon sub [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Single step of heralded iterative Gaussification pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Optimal success probability of squeezing distillation by modified two-photon subtraction for initial squeezing param [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schemes for generation of approximate Gottesman [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Distillation of two-mode squeezed vacuum state. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    Fiur´ aˇ sek, R

    J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, R. Garc ´ ıa-Patr´ on, and N. J. Cerf, Con- ditional generation of arbitrary single-mode quantum states of light by repeated photon subtractions, Phys. Rev. A 72, 033822 (2005)

    work page 2005

  2. [38]

    Takahashi, J.S

    H. Takahashi, J.S. Neergaard-Nielsen, M. Takeuchi, M. Takeoka, K. Hayasaka, A. Furusawa, and M. Sasaki, En- tanglement distillation from Gaussian input states, Nat. Photonics 4, 178 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [1]

    Zavatta, S

    A. Zavatta, S. Viciani, and M. Bellini, Quantum-to- Classical Transition with Single-Photon-Added Coherent States of Light, Science 306, 660 (2004)

    2004

  4. [2]

    Barbieri, N

    M. Barbieri, N. Spagnolo, M. G. Genoni, F. Ferrey- rol, R. Blandino, M. G. A. Paris, P. Grangier, and R. Tualle-Brouri, Non-Gaussianity of quantum states: An experimental test on single-photon-added coherent states, Phys. Rev. A 82, 063833 (2010)

    2010

  5. [3]

    Kumar, E

    R. Kumar, E. Barrios, C. Kupchak, and A. I. Lvovsky, Experimental Characterization of Bosonic Creation and Annihilation Operators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 130403 (2013)

    2013

  6. [4]

    Fadrn´ y, M

    J. Fadrn´ y, M. Neset, M. Bielak, M. Jeˇ zek, J. B ´ ılek, and J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, Experimental preparation of multiphoton- added coherent states of light, npj Quantum Inf. 10, 89 (2024)

    2024

  7. [5]

    Chen, H.-Y

    Y.-R. Chen, H.-Y. Hsieh, J. Ning, H.-C. Wu, H. L. Chen, Z.-H. Shi, P. Yang, O. Steuernagel, C.-M. Wu, and R.-K. Lee, Generation of heralded optical cat states by photon addition, Phys. Rev. A 110, 023703 (2024)

    2024

  8. [6]

    (6) For this amplitude, the quadrature variances of the two-photon subtracted state according to Eq

    sinh2 r . (6) For this amplitude, the quadrature variances of the two-photon subtracted state according to Eq. (4) become VX = 7 + 2 √ 6 3 + √ 6 e2r, V Y = 3 3 + √ 6 e−2r , (7) hence the optimized two-photon subtraction increases the squeeze factor β by the factor ≈ 1.82 (by ≈ 2.6 dB) for arbitrary initial squeeze factors β. This procedure can generate a ...

Show all 89 references
  1. [7]

    Ourjoumtsev, R

    A. Ourjoumtsev, R. Tualle-Brouri, J. Laurat, and P. Grangier, Generating optical Schr¨ odinger kittens for quantum information processing, Science 312, 83 (2006)

    2006

  2. [8]

    J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, B. M. Nielsen, C. Hettich, K. Molmer, and E. S. Polzik, Generation of a superposition of odd photon number states for quantum information networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 083604 (2006)

    2006

  3. [9]

    Wenger, R

    J. Wenger, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, Non- Gaussian Statistics from Individual Pulses of Squeezed Light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 153601 (2004)

    2004

  4. [10]

    Dakna, T

    M. Dakna, T. Anhut, T. Opatrn´ y, L. Kn¨ oll, and D.-G. Welsch, Generating Schr¨ odinger-cat-like states by means of conditional measurements on a beam splitter, Phys. Rev. A 55, 3184 (1997)

    1997

  5. [11]

    Takahashi, K

    H. Takahashi, K. Wakui, S. Suzuki, M. Takeoka, K. Hayasaka, A. Furusawa, and M. Sasaki, Generation of Large-Amplitude Coherent-State Superposition via Ancilla-Assisted Photon Subtraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 233605 (2008)

    2008

  6. [12]

    Wakui, H

    K. Wakui, H. Takahashi, A. Furusawa, and M. Sasaki, Photon subtracted squeezed states generated with peri- odically poled KTiOPO 4, Opt. Express 15, 3568 (2007)

    2007

  7. [13]

    Ourjoumtsev, F

    A. Ourjoumtsev, F. Ferreyrol, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, Preparation of non-local superpositions of quasi-classical light states, Nat. Phys. 5, 189 (2009)

    2009

  8. [14]

    Huang, H

    K. Huang, H. Le Jeannic, J. Ruaudel, V.B. Verma, M.D. Shaw, F. Marsili, S.W. Nam, E Wu, H. Zeng, Y.-C. Jeong, R. Filip, O. Morin, and J. Laurat, Optical Syn- thesis of Large-Amplitude Squeezed Coherent-State Su- perpositions with Minimal Resources, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 023602 (2015)

    2015

  9. [15]

    Marek, H

    P. Marek, H. Jeong, and M.S. Kim, Generating ‘squeezed’ superpositions of coherent states using pho- ton addition and subtraction, Phys. Rev. A 78, 063811 (2008)

    2008

  10. [16]

    Asavanant, K

    W. Asavanant, K. Nakashima, Y. Shiozawa, J.-I. Yoshikawa, and A. Furusawa, Generation of highly pure Schr¨ odinger’s cat states and real-time quadrature mea- surements via optical filtering, Opt. Express 25, 32227 (2017)

    2017

  11. [17]

    Recently, it has been experimentally demonstrated that the squeezing of single-mode squeezed vacuum states can be enhanced by proba- bilistic two-photon subtraction

    listopadu 12, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic 2Institut f¨ ur Quantenphysik & Zentrum f¨ ur Optische Quantentechnologien, Universit¨ at Hamburg, Luruper Chaussee 149, 22761 Hamburg, Germany (Dated: February 4, 2025) Squeezed states of light are one of the most important fundamen...

    2025 arXiv

  12. [18]

    D. V. Sychev, A. E. Ulanov, A. A. Pushkina, M. W. Richards, I. A. Fedorov and A. I. Lvovsky, Enlargement of optical Schr¨ odinger’s cat states, Nat. Photonics 11, 379 (2017)

    2017

  13. [19]

    Eaton, R

    M. Eaton, R. Nehra, and O. Pfister, Non-Gaussian and Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill state preparation by photon catalysis, New J. Phys. 21, 113034 (2019)

    2019

  14. [20]

    Takase, J.-I

    K. Takase, J.-I. Yoshikawa, W. Asavanant, M. Endo, and A. Furusawa, Generation of optical Schr¨ odinger cat states by generalized photon subtraction, Phys. Rev. A 103, 013710 (2021)

    2021

  15. [21]

    M. Endo, R. He, T. Sonoyama, K. Takahashi, T. Kashi- wazaki, T. Umeki, S. Takasu, K. Hattori, D. Fukuda, K. Fukui, K. Takase, W. Asavanant, P. Marek, R. Filip, and A. Furusawa, Non-Gaussian quantum state genera- tion by multi-photon subtraction at the telecommunica- tion wavel...

    2023

  16. [23]

    Konno, W

    S. Konno, W. Asavanant, F. Hanamura, H. Nagayoshi, K. Fukui, A. Sakaguchi, R. Ide, F. China, M. Yabuno, S. Miki, H. Terai, K. Takase, M. Endo, P. Marek, R. Filip, P. van Loock, and A. Furusawa, Logical states for fault- tolerant quantum computation with propagating light, Scie...

    2024

  17. [24]

    Dakna, J

    M. Dakna, J. Clausen, L. Kn¨ oll, and D.-G. Welsch, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1658 (1999); 60, 726 (1999)

    1999

  18. [25]

    Morin, K

    O. Morin, K. Huang, J. Liu, H. Le Jeannic, C. Fabre and J. Laurat, Remote creation of hybrid entanglement between particle-like and wave-like optical qubits, Nat. Photonics 8, 570 (2014)

    2014

  19. [26]

    J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, M. Takeuchi, K. Wakui, H. Takahashi, K. Hayasaka, M. Takeoka, and M. Sasaki, Op- tical Continuous-Variable Qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053602 (2010)

    2010

  20. [27]

    Jeong, A

    H. Jeong, A. Zavatta, M. Kang, S.-W. Lee, L. S. Costanzo, S. Grandi, T. C. Ralph and M. Bellini, Gener- ation of hybrid entanglement of light, Nature Photonics 10 8, 564 (2014)

    2014

  21. [28]

    M. A. Usuga, C. R. Muller, C. Wittmann, P. Marek, R. Filip, C. Marquardt, G. Leuchs, and U. L. Ander- sen, Noise-powered probabilistic concentration of phase information, Nat. Phys. 6, 767 (2010)

    2010

  22. [29]

    Fiur´ aˇ sek, Engineering quantum operations on travel- ing light beams by multiple photon addition and subtrac- tion, Phys

    J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, Engineering quantum operations on travel- ing light beams by multiple photon addition and subtrac- tion, Phys. Rev. A 80, 053822 (2009)

    2009

  23. [30]

    Marek and R

    P. Marek and R. Filip, Coherent-state phase concentra- tion by quantum probabilistic amplification, Phys. Rev. A 81, 022302 (2010)

    2010

  24. [31]

    Neset, J

    M. Neset, J. Fadrn´ y, M. Bielak, J. Fiur´ aˇ sek,, M. Jeˇ zek, and J. B ´ ılek, Experimental noiseless quantum amplifica- tion of coherent states of light by two-photon addition and subtraction, arXiv:2412.13342 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Zavatta, J

    A. Zavatta, J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, and M. Bellini, A high-fidelity noiseless amplifier for quantum light states, Nat. Photon- ics 5, 52 (2010)

    2010

  26. [33]

    J. Park, J. Joo, A. Zavatta, M. Bellini, and H. Jeong, Efficient noiseless linear amplification for light fields with larger amplitudes, Opt. Express 24, 1331 (2016)

    2016

  27. [34]

    Ourjoumtsev, A

    A. Ourjoumtsev, A. Dantan, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, Increasing Entanglement between Gaussian States by Coherent Photon Subtraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 030502 (2007)

    2007

  28. [35]

    L. S. Costanzo, A. S. Coelho, N. Biagi, J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, M. Bellini, and A. Zavatta, Measurement-Induced Strong Kerr Nonlinearity for Weak Quantum States of Light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 013601 (2017)

    2017

  29. [36]

    Opatrn´ y, G

    T. Opatrn´ y, G. Kurizki, and D.-G. Welsch, Improvement on teleportation of continuous variables by photon sub- traction via conditional measurement, Phys. Rev. A 61, 032302 (2000)

    2000

  30. [37]

    Dirmeier, J

    T. Dirmeier, J. Tiedau, I. Khan, V. Ansari, C.R. M¨ uller, C. Silberhorn, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuchs, Distilla- tion of squeezing using an engineered pulsed parametric down-conversion source, Opt. Express 28, 30784 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Kurochkin, A.S

    Y. Kurochkin, A.S. Prasad, and A. I. Lvovsky, Distilla- tion of the Two-Mode Squeezed State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 070402 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Eisert, S

    J. Eisert, S. Scheel, and M. B. Plenio, Distilling Gaussian States with Gaussian Operations Is Impossible, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 137903 (2002)

    2002

  33. [41]

    Grebien, J

    S. Grebien, J. G¨ ottsch, B. Hage, J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, and R. Schnabel, Multistep Two-Copy Distillation of Squeezed States via Two-Photon Subtraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 273604 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Kraus, K

    B. Kraus, K. Hammerer, G. Giedke, and J. I. Cirac, Entanglement generation and Hamiltonian simulation in continuous-variable systems, Phys. Rev. A 67, 042314 (2003)

    2003

  35. [43]

    Heersink, C

    J. Heersink, C. Marquardt, R. Dong, R. Filip, S. Lorenz, G. Leuchs, and U. L. Andersen, Distillation of Squeezing from Non-Gaussian Quantum States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 253601 (2006)

    2006

  36. [44]

    Fiur´ aˇ sek, Gaussian Transformations and Distillation of Entangled Gaussian States, Phys

    J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, Gaussian Transformations and Distillation of Entangled Gaussian States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 137904 (2002)

    2002

  37. [45]

    Giedke and J

    G. Giedke and J. I. Cirac, Characterization of Gaussian operations and distillation of Gaussian states, Phys. Rev. A 66, 032316 (2002)

    2002

  38. [46]

    R. Dong, M. Lassen, J. Heersink, C. Marquardt, R. Filip, G. Leuchs, and U.L. Andersen, Experimental entangle- ment distillation of mesoscopic quantum states, Nature Phys. 4, 919 (2008)

    2008

  39. [47]

    Franzen, B

    A. Franzen, B. Hage, J. DiGuglielmo, J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, and R. Schnabel, Experimental Demonstration of Continuous Variable Purification of Squeezed States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 150505 (2006)

    2006

  40. [48]

    B. Hage, A. Samblowski, J. DiGuglielmo, A. Franzen, J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, and R. Schnabel, Preparation of distilled and purified continuous-variable entangled states, Nature Phys. 4, 915 (2008)

    2008

  41. [49]

    Schnabel, Squeezed states of light and their applica- tions in laser interferometers, Phys

    R. Schnabel, Squeezed states of light and their applica- tions in laser interferometers, Phys. Rep. 684, 1 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    B. Hage, A. Samblowski, J. Diguglielmo, J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, and R. Schnabel, Iterative entanglement distillation: Ap- proaching the elimination of decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 230502 (2010)

    2010

  43. [51]

    Walls, Squeezed states of light, Nature 306, 141 (1983)

    D.F. Walls, Squeezed states of light, Nature 306, 141 (1983)

    1983

  44. [52]

    Abadie et al., A gravitational wave observatory oper- ating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit, Nat

    J. Abadie et al., A gravitational wave observatory oper- ating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit, Nat. Phys. 7, 962 (2011)

    2011

  45. [53]

    Braunstein, Squeezing as an irreducible resource, Phys

    S.L. Braunstein, Squeezing as an irreducible resource, Phys. Rev. A 71, 055801 (2005)

    2005

  46. [54]

    E. S. Polzik, J. Carri, and H. J. Kimble, Spectroscopy with Squeezed Light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3020 (1992)

    1992

  47. [55]

    Furusawa, J

    A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, Unconditional quantum teleportation, Science 282, 706 (1998)

    1998

  48. [56]

    Steinlechner, J

    S. Steinlechner, J. Bauchrowitz, M. Meinders, H. M¨ uller- Ebhardt, K. Danzmann and R. Schnabel, Quantum- dense metrology, Nature Photonics 7, 626 (2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    Acernese et al., Increasing the Astrophysical Reach of the Advanced Virgo Detector via the Application of Squeezed Vacuum States of Light, Phys

    F. Acernese et al., Increasing the Astrophysical Reach of the Advanced Virgo Detector via the Application of Squeezed Vacuum States of Light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231108 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    L. S. Madsen, V. C. Usenko, M. Lassen, R. Filip and U. L. Andersen, Continuous variable quantum key distribution with modulated entangled states, Nat. Commun. 3, 1083 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    W. P. Bowen, N. Treps, B. C. Buchler, R. Schnabel, T. C. Ralph, H.-A. Bachor, T. Symul, and P. K. Lam, Ex- perimental investigation of continuous-variable quantum teleportation, Phys. Rev. A 67, 032302 (2003)

    2003

  52. [60]

    N. J. Cerf, M. L´ evy, and G. Van Assche, Quantum dis- tribution of Gaussian keys using squeezed states, Phys. Rev. A 63, 052311 (2001)

    2001

  53. [61]

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, Quantum informa- 11 tion with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005)

    2005

  54. [62]

    C. S. Jacobsen, L. S. Madsen, V. C. Usenko, R. Filip and U. L. Andersen, Complete elimination of information leakage in continuous-variable quantum communication channels, npj Quantum Information 4, 32 (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    Gehring, V

    T. Gehring, V. H¨ andchen, J. Duhme, F. Furrer, T. Franz, C. Pacher, R. F. Werner, and R. Schnabel, Implemen- tation of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with composable and one-sided-device-independent se- curity against coherent attacks, Nat. Commun. 6, 8795 (2015)

    2015

  56. [64]

    Eisert, D

    J. Eisert, D. E. Browne, S. Scheel, and M. B. Plenio, Dis- tillation of continuous-variable entanglement with optical means, Ann. Phys. 311, 431 (2004)

    2004

  57. [65]

    Gottesman, A

    D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012310 (2001)

    2001

  58. [66]

    D. E. Browne, J. Eisert, S. Scheel, and M. B. Plenio, Driving non-Gaussian to Gaussian states with linear op- tics, Phys. Rev. A. 67, 062320 (2003)

    2003

  59. [67]

    C. M. Nunn, S. U. Shringarpure, and T. B. Pittman, Transforming photon statistics through zero-photon sub- traction, Phys. Rev. A 107, 043711 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    Miˇ cuda, I

    M. Miˇ cuda, I. Straka, M. Mikov´ a, M. Duˇ sek, N. J. Cerf, J.Fiur´ aˇ sek, and M. Jeˇ zek, Noiseless Loss Suppression in Quantum Optical Communication, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 180503 (2012)

    2012

  61. [69]

    C. M. Nunn, J. D. Franson, and T. B. Pittman, Modify- ing quantum optical states by zero-photon subtraction, Phys. Rev. A 105, 033702 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    ˇReh´ aˇ cek, Z

    J. ˇReh´ aˇ cek, Z. Hradil, O. Haderka, J. Peˇ rina, and M. Hamar, Multiple-photon resolving fiber-loop detector, Phys. Rev. A 67, 061801(R) (2003)

    2003

  63. [71]

    A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, and S. W. Nam, Counting near- infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency, Opt. Express 16, 3032 (2008)

    2008

  64. [72]

    Eaton, A

    M. Eaton, A. Hossameldin, R. J. Birrittella, P. M. Alsing, C. C. Gerry, H. Dong, C. Cuevas, and O. Pfister, Resolu- tion of 100 photons and quantum generation of unbiased random numbers, Nature Photonics 17, 106 (2022)

    2022

  65. [73]

    Achilles, C

    D. Achilles, C. Silberhorn, C. Sliwa, K. Banaszek, and I. A. Walmsley, Fiber-assisted detection with photon num- ber resolution, Opt. Lett. 28, 2387 (2003)

    2003

  66. [74]

    Banaszek and I

    K. Banaszek and I. A. Walmsley, Photon counting with a loop detector, Opt. Lett. 28, 52 (2003)

    2003

  67. [75]

    M. J. Fitch, B. C. Jacobs, T. B. Pittman, and J. D. Fran- son, Photon-number resolution using time-multiplexed single-photon detectors, Phys. Rev. A 68, 043814 (2003)

    2003

  68. [76]

    Cheng, Y

    R. Cheng, Y. Zhou, S. Wang, M. Shen, T. Taher, and H. X. Tang, A 100-pixel photon-number-resolving detec- tor unveiling photon statistics, Nature Photonics 17, 112 (2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    T. J. Bartley, G. Donati, X.-M. Jin, A. Datta, M. Bar- bieri, and I. A. Walmsley, Direct observation of subbino- mial light, Phys. Rev. Lett 110, 173602 (2013)

    2013

  70. [78]

    Hlouˇ sek, M

    J. Hlouˇ sek, M. Dudka, I. Straka, and M. Jeˇ zek, Accurate detection of arbitrary photon statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett 123, 153604 (2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    Tomoda, A

    H. Tomoda, A. Machinaga, K. Takase, J. Harada, T. Kashiwazaki, T. Umeki, S. Miki, F. China, M. Yabuno, H. Terai, D. Okuno, and S. Takeda, Boosting the genera- tion rate of squeezed single-photon states by generalized photon subtraction, Phys. Rev. A 110, 033717 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    H. M. Vasconcelos, L. Sanz, and S. Glancy, All-optical generation of states for ”Encoding a qubit in an oscilla- tor”, Opt. Lett. 35, 3261 (2010)

    2010

  73. [81]

    A. J. Pizzimenti and D. Soh, Optical Gottesman-Kitaev- Preskill Qubit Generation via Approximate Squeezed Schr¨ odinger Cat State Breeding, arXiv:2409.06902 [quant-ph] (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    More- over, the de-Gaussification leading to state purification requires two copies of the state

    involves a nested iterative scheme, where Gaussi- fied states have to be repeatedly de-Gaussified. More- over, the de-Gaussification leading to state purification requires two copies of the state. Simultaneous distilla- tion and purification of single-mode squeezing appears to...

  75. [83]

    S. B. Korolev, E. N. Bashmakova, A. K. Tagantsev, and T. Yu. Golubeva, Generation of squeezed Fock states by measurement, Phys. Rev. A 109, 052428 (2024)

    2024

  76. [84]

    A. P. Lund and T. C. Ralph Phys. Rev. A 80, 032309 (2009)

    2009

  77. [85]

    Fiur´ aˇ sek, Phys

    J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, Phys. Rev. A82, 042331 (2010)

    2010

  78. [86]

    Zhang, H

    K. Zhang, H. Li, J. Jing, N Treps, and M. Walschaers, Purification of Gaussian States by Photon Subtraction, arXiv:2409.03473 [quant-ph] (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  79. [87]

    A. E. Ulanov, I. A. Fedorov, A. A. Pushkina, Y. V. Kurochkin, T. C. Ralph and A. I. Lvovsky, Undoing the effect of loss on quantum entanglement, Nature Photon- ics 9, 764 (2015)

    2015

  80. [88]

    A. I. Lvovsky and J. Mlynek, Quantum-Optical Cataly- sis: Generating Nonclassical States of Light by Means of Linear Optics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 250401 (2002)

    2002

  81. [89]

    Zavatta, V

    A. Zavatta, V. Parigi, M. S. Kim, H. Jeong, and M. Bellini, Experimental Demonstration of the Bosonic Commutation Relation via Superpositions of Quantum Operations on Thermal Light Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 140406 (2009)

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.