Pith. sign in

REVIEW

BIASeD: Bringing Irrationality into Automated System Design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.01122 v3 pith:TPJAIRF6 submitted 2022-10-01 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords biasescognitivehumansystemsartificialdesignintelligencemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Human perception, memory and decision-making are impacted by tens of cognitive biases and heuristics that influence our actions and decisions. Despite the pervasiveness of such biases, they are generally not leveraged by today's Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems that model human behavior and interact with humans. In this theoretical paper, we claim that the future of human-machine collaboration will entail the development of AI systems that model, understand and possibly replicate human cognitive biases. We propose the need for a research agenda on the interplay between human cognitive biases and Artificial Intelligence. We categorize existing cognitive biases from the perspective of AI systems, identify three broad areas of interest and outline research directions for the design of AI systems that have a better understanding of our own biases.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools