Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 110 references

Rare Events and Single Big Jump Effects in Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Processes

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single giant excursion, not many small fluctuations, produces the rarest values of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck time-integrated observable.

desk verdict Solid paper that connects the big jump principle to OU large deviations; the v0→0 limit is the one place to push back. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.07704 v2 pith:TPQ7425I submitted 2025-01-13 cond-mat.stat-mech

Alberto Bassanoni , Alessandro Vezzani , Eli Barkai , Raffaella Burioni This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords Ornstein-Uhlenbeckprocessbigjumpprinciplelargedeviationsexcursionscontinuoustimerandomwalkfirst-passageareastretchedexponentialtaildynamicalphasetransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the rarest large values of the time-integrated observable $A = \int_0^T v^n(t)\,dt$ for an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck velocity $v(t)$ are produced by a single exceptionally large excursion away from zero, not by many small fluctuations adding up. For $n>2$ it derives the stretched-exponential tail $P(A,T) \asymp T\exp\{-\gamma^{(n+2)/n} c_n \sigma^{-2} A^{2/n}\}$, with the constant $c_n$ given explicitly, and shows that this tail coincides with the one previously obtained by a weak-noise path-integral (instanton) calculation. The mechanism is made concrete by mapping the continuous process to a continuous-time random walk whose steps are the signed areas of excursions between zero crossings; because the excursion-area distribution is subexponential, the single big jump principle applies. This matters because it gives a physical picture of anomalous dynamical large deviations and ties the far tail to a critical point in the first-passage area statistics. Typical fluctuations are handled in the same formalism and are Gaussian with an explicit diffusion constant valid for every integer $n$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the excursion decomposition of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck path. Zero crossings form a renewal process, but because continuous paths cross zero uncountably often, the paper regularizes by considering excursions that start at $v_0>0$ and end at the first hitting of zero; each renewal step is the pair $(\tau_i, A_i)$ consisting of the duration and the signed area $\int v^n(t)\,dt$ of one excursion. The first-passage area density $f_{v_0}(A)$ satisfies the backward differential equation $v_0^n \partial_A f - \gamma v_0 \partial_{v_0} f + (\sigma^2/2)\partial^2_{v_0} f = 0$. Substituting the anomalous rate-function ansatz $f_{v_0}(A) \asymp v_0\exp\{-A^{2/n}\sigma^{-2} I(v_0/A^{1/n})\}$ reduces this equation to the nonlinear ODE $\frac12 (I')^2 + I'(\gamma\omega - \omega^{n+1}/n) + \frac{2}{n}\omega^n I = 0$, whose critical point at $\omega_c=(\gamma n)^{1/n}$ marks the deterministic noiseless relaxation and whose value at $\omega=0$ fixes $c_n$. Since $f_{v_0}(A)$ decays subexponentially for $n>2$, the continuous-time random walk big jump estimate $P(A,T)\approx \langle N(T)\rangle f(A)$ applies; the regularizing factors $\langle\tau(v_0)\rangle\sim \text{const}\times v_0$ and $f_{v_0}(A)\sim v_0\exp(\cdots)$ cancel in the $v_0\to0$ limit, leaving the $T$-linear stretched-exponential tail.

What would settle it

Compute the tail of $P(A,T)$ for $n=3$ and $n=4$ at fixed large values of $A/T^{n/(2n-2)}$ using a rare-event sampler, and compare $-\log P(A,T)$ with $\gamma^{(n+2)/n} c_n \sigma^{-2} A^{2/n}$ and with the predicted linear dependence on $T$; also measure whether, conditional on a large $A$, a single excursion accounts for almost all of $A$. A slope disagreement for any $n>2$, or the presence of multiple comparable excursions in the conditioning set, would overturn the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is that for $n>2$, in the combined limit $A,T\to\infty$ with $A/T^{n/(2n-2)}$ fixed, the distribution of $A=\int_0^T v^n(t)\,dt$ obeys $P(A,T) \asymp T\exp\{-\gamma^{(n+2)/n} c_n \sigma^{-2} A^{2/n}\}$ (Eq. (17)), where $c_n$ is the explicit constant in Eq. (30). The tail is subexponential in $A$ and linear in $T$, the linear factor being the average number of zero-crossing renewals in time $T$. The route runs through the first-passage area distribution of a single excursion, $f_{v_0}(A) \asymp v_0 \exp\{-A^{2/n}\sigma^{-2} I(v_0/A^{1/n})\}$, whose rate function $I$ solves a nonlinear differential equation, has its minimum at the noiseless deterministic value $\omega_c=(\gamma n)^{1/n}$, and takes the constant value $I(0)=\gamma^{(n+2)/n} c_n$. The paper's reading of this chain is that the anomalous scaling previously attributed to an instantonic solution is exactly the single big jump effect, with the largest excursion controlling the far tail.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the $v_0\to0$ regularization of the uncountably many zero crossings can be interchanged with the large-$A$ limit: the factor $v_0$ in the excursion-area density cancels exactly against the factor $v_0$ in $\langle\tau(v_0)\rangle$, leaving a tail independent of the regularization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $n>2$ the entire large-$A$ tail of $P(A,T)$ is fixed by first-passage area statistics, so the anomalous exponent $2/n$ and coefficient $c_n$ need no variational path-integral input.
  • Typical fluctuations are Gaussian with the diffusion constant $D_n=\langle A^2\rangle/(2\langle\tau\rangle)$ given by Eq. (14), reproducing the previously known perturbative result for $n>2$ and extending it to $n=1,2$.
  • The excursion-area rate function has a critical point at $\omega_c=(\gamma n)^{1/n}$ separating a Brownian small-area regime from a subexponential large-area regime, so the dynamical phase transition in $P(A,T)$ has a counterpart in the single-excursion statistics.
  • Because the big jump tail and the instantonic tail share the same constant $c_n$, the optimal instantonic path and the single dominant excursion are the same asymptotic event described by two methods.
  • For even $n$, the same formulas apply to the shifted observable $A-\langle v^n\rangle_{\mathrm{eq}} T$, so the results cover time-averaged energy and higher even moments as well as odd moments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the big jump mechanism is correct, rare-event simulations that condition on one large excursion should reproduce the tail far more cheaply than brute-force sampling, and the distribution of the largest observed excursion area should predict the tail of $P(A,T)$.
  • Editorial inference: the same excursion-to-CTRW strategy should produce stretched-exponential tails for other recurrent one-dimensional diffusions with exponentially decaying correlations whenever the first-passage area distribution is subexponential; the exponent would be set by the tail of that distribution rather than by $n$ alone.
  • Editorial inference: the paper leaves open whether the $v_0\to0$ and $A\to\infty$ limits can be rigorously interchanged; proving this interchange would turn the big jump principle into a theorem for correlated continuous processes, while a counterexample would show that the tail prefactor depends on the regularization.
  • Editorial inference: the mapping to weakly binding potential rate functions suggests an equivalence class of observables whose anomalous rate functions coincide after rescaling; testing this equivalence numerically for $n=3,4,5$ would either confirm the universality or expose where it ends.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the distribution of the time-integrated observable A = ∫_0^T v^n(t) dt for an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. The authors construct a CTRW representation based on excursions between zero crossings, regularized by starting each excursion at v0 > 0 and taking v0 → 0. From this representation they derive the Gaussian bulk of P(A,T) via an Einstein relation, compute the diffusion coefficient D_n in closed form, and then analyze the first-passage excursion area distribution f_{v0}(A) through the large-deviation ansatz in Eq. (26). They obtain the rate-function equation (29), identify a critical point associated with the noiseless solution, and extract the anomalous tail f_{v0}(A) ~ v0 exp{-(γ^{(n+2)/n} c_n / σ^2) A^{2/n}}. Applying the single-big-jump principle then yields the central result P(A,T) ≍ T exp{-(γ^{(n+2)/n} c_n / σ^2) A^{2/n}} for n > 2, matching earlier instanton results while offering a big-jump interpretation.

Significance. If the derivation is made rigorous, the paper gives an appealing physical picture: the anomalous stretched-exponential tail of a time-integrated observable is produced by one dominant excursion, not by a collective instanton path. The explicit mapping of the first-passage area rate function to the weakly bound Brownian particle problem of Refs. [86,87] is a useful connection, and the closed-form diffusion constant obtained by three independent methods (renewal theory, Green-Kubo, and the earlier Donsker-Varadhan result) is a clean consistency check. The numerical simulations support the analytical claims. The final tail itself, however, is not new: it reproduces the known results of Refs. [55-57]. The genuinely new content is the excursion-area rate function and the big-jump derivation, together with the statement that the same c_n emerges from the WKB constant of the mapped problem. The paper would be stronger if the authors explicitly acknowledged that Eq. (17) is a re-derivation of a known asymptotic result rather than presenting it as a new prediction.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section V, Eq. (37)] The limit interchange v0→0 and A→∞ is the load-bearing step for the central result (17), but it is only asserted. The tail (34) is obtained from the large-deviation ansatz (26) by taking A→∞ at fixed ω=v0/A^{1/n} and then sending ω→0; Eq. (37), by contrast, requires f_{v0}(A) for fixed large A to have a well-defined v0→0 limit that factorizes as v0 times the same exponential. Since ⟨τ(v0)⟩∼v0, the cancellation in (37) depends on this exact factorization. Any subleading v0 dependence in the prefactor (for example v0^{1+α}A^β) or any residual dependence of the effective number of renewals on v0 would change the prefactor or the coefficient in Eq. (17). The statement in Section V that for very large areas f_{v0}(A) is independent of v0 is precisely the needed uniformity condition; it should be proved or supported by a controlled asymptotic bound. The numerical collapse in Fig. 5 at finite v0 is suggestive but does not establish the required limit interchange.
  2. [Abstract and Section I] The phrase 'complete distribution' in the abstract overstates what is derived. The paper obtains the Gaussian bulk (8) by the CLT and the far tail (17) by the big-jump principle, but it does not derive the distribution in the intermediate/matching regime, nor does it prove that these two asymptotic regimes exhaust the distribution of A. Please revise the abstract and the corresponding claims in Section II C to say explicitly that the paper characterizes the bulk and the far tail, not the complete distribution.
  3. [Section V, Eqs. (9) and (36)] The derivation of the big-jump formula neglects the contribution of the final incomplete excursion A* on the ground that the waiting-time density ψ(τ) decays exponentially, while f(A) is subexponential. The relevant question is whether a subexponential jump can occur in the backward recurrence time τ*, and exponential decay of ψ(τ) alone does not exclude this; this is precisely the subtlety for which Ref. [48] is invoked. The paper should either prove that the A* contribution is subleading in the double limit A,T→∞ or state it explicitly as an assumption. This matters because a non-negligible last-excursion term would alter the prefactor T/⟨τ⟩ in Eq. (38).
  4. [Section IV, Eqs. (29)-(30) and Appendix E] The constant c_n in Eq. (30) is imported from Refs. [86,87] after a change of variables that involves a sign difference and a shift of the potential. The equality of I(0) after these transformations is asserted rather than derived. Because c_n enters the central tail (17) exponentially, the authors should show explicitly that the WKB result of Refs. [86,87] applies to Eq. (E11) with their sign convention, or derive I(0) directly from Eq. (29).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II C] There is a duplicated sentence: 'The result for D_n obtained in [57] is valid only for n>2, The result...' should be corrected to a single, grammatically complete statement.
  2. [Figure 6 caption] The caption describes the curves as 'dotted curves' and then as a 'dotted continuous blue curve'; please clarify which curve is the numerical data, which is the big-jump estimate, and which is the far-tail asymptote.
  3. [Section V, after Eq. (34)] The sentence 'The expression of f_{v0}(A) has been studied in the previous section by fixing A^{1/n}/v0 and taking A large. This means that also v0 is large' can be misread, because the tail (34) applies for large A with ω=v0/A^{1/n}→0, not with ω held fixed. Please distinguish the two limits explicitly.
  4. [Section IV, Eq. (27)] In Eq. (27) the A-dependence of the term δω^{n+1}I(ω) is not displayed, while the other terms carry explicit powers of A; please show the omitted factor so that the balancing argument leading to Eq. (28) is transparent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the main tail is assembled from independently derived ingredients; the unproved v0→0 interchange is a rigor gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The tail P(A,T) ≍ T exp{−γ^{(n+2)/n} c_n A^{2/n}/σ²} (Eqs. 17/38) is assembled from independently computed ingredients: (i) ⟨τ(v0)⟩ ∼ (√π/(σ√γ)) v0 from the known Ornstein-Uhlenbeck first-passage solution (Eq. 19); (ii) the excursion-area tail f_v0(A) ∼ v0 exp{−γ^{(n+2)/n} c_n A^{2/n}/σ²} obtained by inserting the large-deviation ansatz (26) into the backward Fokker-Planck equation (13), yielding the rate-function ODE (29); and (iii) the renewal big-jump estimate P(A,T) ∼ (T/⟨τ(v0)⟩) f_v0(A) (Eq. 37). The constant c_n in Eq. (30) is imported from Refs. [86,87], which share author Barkai, but it is not fitted to P(A,T): it is an analytic WKB boundary value for the same ODE, and the paper notes it agrees with the independent instanton results [55–57] and with numerics. The v0→0 limit in Eq. (37) is asserted rather than proved; the paper itself notes in Section VI that zero crossings are uncountable for the continuous OU path, and subleading v0-dependent corrections are not controlled. That is a mathematical rigor gap and a correctness risk, not circularity: no equation defines the target P(A,T) tail as an input in disguise, and the final tail was not used in deriving f_v0(A). Hence the central claim retains independent content and the self-citations are supporting, not load-bearing in a circular sense.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on a small set of assumptions: the excursion renewal structure of the OU process, the v0→0 regularization, the subexponential waiting-time assumption, the rate-function ansatz, and the imported constant c_n from [86,87]. No free parameters are fitted to data, and no new entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The OU process is recurrent and its zero crossings define a renewal process with IID excursion areas and durations in the v0→0 limit.
    Invoked in Section II A to map to a CTRW; the text itself notes zero crossings are uncountable in a finite interval, so the v0 regularization is required.
  • ad hoc to paper The limit v0→0 commutes with A→∞ in the big jump formula (Eq. 37), so the product (T/⟨τ(v0)⟩) f_v0(A) has a finite, v0-independent limit.
    Stated as expectation in Section V; no proof that subleading v0 corrections do not affect the tail.
  • domain assumption The waiting-time distribution ψ_v0(τ) has an exponential tail, so the contribution of the last (backward recurrence) excursion to the big jump is negligible.
    Used in Sections II A and V; the exponential tail is standard for OU first-passage times (Eq. 12).
  • ad hoc to paper The large deviation ansatz f_v0(A) ≍ v0 exp{-(A^δ/σ²) I(v0/A^β)} with β=1/n, δ=2/n captures the leading behavior of the first-passage area PDF.
    The scaling form is an ansatz (Eq. 26); the exponents are fixed self-consistently in Eq. (28), but the validity of the ansatz itself is assumed.
  • standard math The constant I(0)=γ^((n+2)/n) c_n from Refs [86,87] applies to the physical solution of Eq. (29); the solution is selected by matching the noiseless limit at ω_c.
    Borrowed from Defaveri, Barkai, Kessler with explicit mapping in Appendix E; treated as an independent external result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rare Events and Single Big Jump Effects in Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Processes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TPQ7425I

@misc{pith2026250107704,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rare Events and Single Big Jump Effects in Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Processes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TPQ7425I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.07704}
}
abstract

Even in a simple stochastic process, the study of the full distribution of time integrated observables can be a difficult task. This is the case of a much-studied process such as the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process where, recently, anomalous dynamical scaling of large deviations of time integrated functionals has been highlighted. Using the mapping of a continuous stochastic process to a continuous time random walk via the "excursions technique'', we introduce a comprehensive formalism that enables the calculation of the complete distribution of the time-integrated observable $A = \int_0^T v^n(t) dt$, where $n$ is a positive integer and $v(t)$ is the random velocity of a particle following Ornstein-Uhlenbeck dynamics. We reveal an interesting connection between the anomalous rate function associated with the observable $A$ and the statistics of the area under the first-passage functional during an excursion. The rate function of the latter, analyzed here for the first time, exhibits anomalous scaling behavior and a dynamical phase transition, both of which are explored in detail. The case of the anomalous scaling of large deviations, originally associated to the presence of an instantonic solution in the weak noise regime of a path integral approach, is here produced by a so called "big jump effect'', in which the contribution to rare events is dominated by the largest excursion. Our approach, which is quite general for continuous stochastic processes, allows to associate a physical meaning to the anomalous scaling of large deviations, through the big jump principle.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.07704 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: A realization of a Langevin path for the process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: A schematic figure showing a generic path of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The variance Var( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Schematic plot of the asymptotic solutions of the rat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Plot of the rate function of the area under the first pas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Numerical simulations of the tail of the PDF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [48]

    Vezzani and R

    A. Vezzani and R. Burioni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 187101 (2024), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.187101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.187101 2024

  2. [1]

    The first passage time to the absorbing point v = 0 of the process vn(t) is the same as the first passage time of v(t)

    First Passage Time Statistics ψ v0 (τ) The PDF of first passage time ψ v0 (τ) is a well known physical quantity studied with standard techniques [66–69], in particular we want to compute the PDF ψ v0 (τ) that a generic path of vn(t) starting from an initial velocity v0> 0 travels the positive half-plane (0, +∞) until it hits for the first time the zero line...

  3. [2]

    excursions technique

    First Passage Area Under Excursions Statistics fv0 (A) Analogously to what was done for the first passage times PDF, we ca n define a backward equation for the PDF of first passage areas under excursions fv0 (A). In Appendix B we report the full derivation of the fv0 (A) equation from a path integral approach, firstly introduced in [ 72, 82] to describe the fi...

    2021

  4. [3]

    is deeply related to the fact that f (A) is subexponential and hence to the big jump principle. To summarize, with the CTR W defined through the excursions and th e times between zero crossings, we can fully characterize in a unified framework the typical fluctuations of the PDFP (A,T ) from the statistics of the moments of waiting times and excursion areas ...

  5. [4]

    den Hollander, Large Deviations (Fields Institute Monographs, American Mathematical Soci ety, 2000), URL https://doi.org/10.1090/fim/014

    F. den Hollander, Large Deviations (Fields Institute Monographs, American Mathematical Soci ety, 2000), URL https://doi.org/10.1090/fim/014

    work page doi:10.1090/fim/014 2000

  6. [5]

    Mean First Passage Time We start from the equation ( 18) and recall the absorbing boundary condition at the line ⟨τ⟩(v0 → 0) = 0 and the reflective boundary condition at infinity ∂v0 ⟨τ⟩(v0 → ∞) = 0. To solve this second order ordinary differential equation, one can reduce it to an equation of first order by defining y(v0) = ∂v0 ⟨τ⟩(v0), and this is obtained: ...

  7. [6]

    Then, putting everything back together, the leading order of ⟨τ⟩(v0) for v0 → 0 turns out to be: ⟨τ⟩(v0) ∼ v0→0 π 2γ ( 2 √ γ π 1 σv0 ) − 1 σ 2v2 0 (D4) ∼ v0→0 1 σ √ π γv0

    and erfi (√γv 0 σ ) ∼ 2 √ γ π 1 σv0 +o(v2 0). Then, putting everything back together, the leading order of ⟨τ⟩(v0) for v0 → 0 turns out to be: ⟨τ⟩(v0) ∼ v0→0 π 2γ ( 2 √ γ π 1 σv0 ) − 1 σ 2v2 0 (D4) ∼ v0→0 1 σ √ π γv0

  8. [7]

    Once again, we can define the first derivative y(v0) = ∂v0 ⟨A⟩ and solve the associated first order ODE by variation of constants method

    Mean Squared First Passage Excursion for n odd Starting again from the equation for the mean first passage excur sion ( 20) and recalling the absorbing boundary condition at the lower bound ⟨A⟩(v0 → 0) = 0 and the reflective boundary condition at infinity ∂v0, ⟨A⟩(v0 → ∞) = 0 we now evaluate it in the case of n odd. Once again, we can define the first derivati...

Show all 110 references
  1. [8]

    Mean Squared First Passage Excursion for n even The calculation of the mean squared displacement ⟨A2⟩ in the case of even n is very similar to the case of odd n, with one important difference to consider: in this process the mean v alue of the dynamical observable ⟨A⟩(v0) ⁄= 0 ...

  2. [9]

    E. J. Gumbel, Annales de l’institut Henri Poincar´ e 5, 115 (1935), URL http://www.numdam.org/item/AIHP_1935__5_2_115_0/

    1935

  3. [10]

    Frechet, Annales de la societe Polonaise de Mathemati que 6, 96 (1927)

    M. Frechet, Annales de la societe Polonaise de Mathemati que 6, 96 (1927)

    1927

  4. [11]

    Vulpiani, F

    A. Vulpiani, F. Cecconi, M. Cencini, A. Puglisi, and D. Ve rgni, Large Deviations in Physics (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014), URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54251-0

    2014 doi

  5. [12]

    Baek and Y

    Y. Baek and Y. Kafri, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2015, P08026 (2015), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2015/08/P08026

    2015 doi

  6. [13]

    de Arcangelis, C

    L. de Arcangelis, C. Godano, J. R. Grasso, and E. Lippiell o, Physics Reports 628, 1 (2016), ISSN 0370-1573, statistical physics approach to earthquak e occurrence and forecasting, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157316300011

    2016

  7. [14]

    If n is odd we have that α n = 0, so the second term in the last line disappears

    and it can be checked in a simple way that this expression is valid both in the case of n even and n odd and it’s equal to the result obtained with the CTR W approach. If n is odd we have that α n = 0, so the second term in the last line disappears. Appendix D: Mean First Pass...

  8. [15]

    Black F., Scholes, Journal of Political Economy 81, 637 (1973), URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831029

    M. Black F., Scholes, Journal of Political Economy 81, 637 (1973), URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831029

    1973

  9. [16]

    Filiasi, G

    M. Filiasi, G. Livan, M. Marsili, M. Peressi, E. Vesselli , and E. Zarinelli, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theor y and Experiment 2014, P09030 (2014), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2014/09/P09030

    2014 doi

  10. [17]

    Embrechts, C

    P. Embrechts, C. Kl¨ uppelberg, and T. Mikosch, Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000), URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33483-2

    doi

  11. [18]

    Albeverio, V

    S. Albeverio, V. Jentsch, and H. Kantz, Extreme Events in Nature and Society (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010), URL https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28611-X

    2010 doi

  12. [19]

    Touchette, Physics Reports 478, 1 (2009), ISSN 0370-1573, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037015730

    H. Touchette, Physics Reports 478, 1 (2009), ISSN 0370-1573, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037015730

    2009

  13. [20]

    H. Touchette, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 504, 5 (2018), ISSN 0378-4371, lec- ture Notes of the 14th International Summer School on Fundam ental Problems in Statistical Physics, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437117310567

    2018

  14. [21]

    Vivo, European Journal of Physics 36, 055037 (2015), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/5/055037

    P. Vivo, European Journal of Physics 36, 055037 (2015), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/5/055037

    2015 doi

  15. [22]

    Dembo and Z

    A. Dembo and Z. Ofer, Large Deviations Techniques and Applications (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010), URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03311-7

    2010 doi

  16. [23]

    S. N. Majumdar and A. J. Bray, Phys. Rev. E 65, 051112 (2002), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.051112

    2002 doi

  17. [24]

    V. P. Chistyakov, Theory of Probability Its Applicatio ns 9, 640 (1964), https://doi.org/10.1137/1109088, URL https://doi.org/10.1137/1109088

    1964 doi

  18. [25]

    S. Foss, D. Korshunov, and S. Zachary, An Introduction to Heavy-Tailed and Subexponential Distri butions (Springer New York, NY, 2013)

    2013

  19. [26]

    F. Mori, G. Gradenigo, and S. N. Majumdar, Journal of Sta tistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2021, 103208 (2021), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ac2899

    2021 doi

  20. [27]

    Corberi, Phys

    F. Corberi, Phys. Rev. E 95, 032136 (2017), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.032136

    2017 doi

  21. [28]

    Gradenigo and S

    G. Gradenigo and S. N. Majumdar, J. Stat. Mech. p. 053206 (2019), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ab11be

    2019 doi

  22. [29]

    S. N. Majumdar, M. R. Evans, and R. K. P. Zia, Phys. Rev. Le tt. 94, 180601 (2005), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.180601

    2005 doi

  23. [30]

    Bouchaud and M

    J.-P. Bouchaud and M. M´ ezard, Physica A: Statistical M echanics and its Applications 282, 536 (2000), ISSN 0378-4371, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437100002053. 26

    2000

  24. [31]

    Cagnetta, F

    F. Cagnetta, F. Corberi, G. Gonnella, and A. Suma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 158002 (2017), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.158002

    2017 doi

  25. [32]

    Baldovin, E

    F. Baldovin, E. Orlandini, and F. Seno, Frontiers in Phy sics 7 (2019), ISSN 2296-424X, URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2019.00124

    2019

  26. [33]

    Nampoothiri, E

    S. Nampoothiri, E. Orlandini, F. Seno, and F. Baldovin, Phys. Rev. E 104 (2021), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.L062501

    2021 doi

  27. [34]

    Nampoothiri, E

    S. Nampoothiri, E. Orlandini, F. Seno, and F. Baldovin, New Journal of Physics 24 (2022), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac4924

    2022 doi

  28. [35]

    Semeraro, G

    M. Semeraro, G. Gonnella, A. Suma, and M. Zamparo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 158302 (2023), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.158302

    2023 doi

  29. [36]

    S. N. Majumdar and M. Vergassola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 060601 (2009), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.060601

    2009 doi

  30. [37]

    N. A. Cook, R. Ducatez, and A. Guionnet, Full large deviation principles for the largest eigenvalue of sub-gaussian wigner matrices (2024), 2302.14823, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.14823

    2024 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Valov, B

    A. Valov, B. Meerson, and P. V. Sasorov, Journal of Physi cs A: Mathematical and Theoretical 57, 065001 (2024), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ad1e1a

    2024 doi

  32. [39]

    M. R. Evans, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Journal of Phy sics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53, 193001 (2020), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ab7cfe

    2020 doi

  33. [40]

    F. Mori, K. S. Olsen, and S. Krishnamurthy, Phys. Rev. Re s. 5, 023103 (2023), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023103

    2023 doi

  34. [41]

    N. R. Smith and S. N. Majumdar, Journal of Statistical Me chanics: Theory and Experiment 2022, 053212 (2022), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ac6f04

    2022 doi

  35. [42]

    Vezzani, E

    A. Vezzani, E. Barkai, and R. Burioni, Phys. Rev. E 100, 012108 (2019), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.100.012108

    2019 doi

  36. [43]

    Vezzani, E

    A. Vezzani, E. Barkai, and R. Burioni, Scientific Report s 10, 2732 (2020), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59187-w

    2020 doi

  37. [44]

    W. Wang, A. Vezzani, R. Burioni, and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev . Res. 1, 033172 (2019), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033172

    2019 doi

  38. [45]

    Burioni, G

    R. Burioni, G. Gradenigo, A. Sarracino, A. Vezzani, and A. Vulpiani, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2013, P09022 (2013), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2013/09/P09022

    2013 doi

  39. [46]

    H¨ oll and E

    M. H¨ oll and E. Barkai, The European Physical Journal B 94 (2021), ISSN 1434-6036, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00215-7

    2021 doi

  40. [47]

    Burioni and A

    R. Burioni and A. Vezzani, J. Stat. Mech. p. 034005 (2020 ), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ab74ca

    2020 doi

  41. [49]

    Bassanoni, A

    A. Bassanoni, A. Vezzani, and R. Burioni, Chaos 34, 083144 (2024), URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0216439

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    Burioni, L

    R. Burioni, L. Caniparoli, and A. Vezzani, Phys. Rev. E 81, 060101 (2010), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.060101

    2010 doi

  43. [51]

    Burioni, S

    R. Burioni, S. di Santo, S. Lepri, and A. Vezzani, Phys. R ev. E 86, 031125 (2012), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.031125

    2012 doi

  44. [52]

    Artuso, G

    R. Artuso, G. Cristadoro, M. Onofri, and M. Radice, Jour nal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2018, 083209 (2018), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/aad822

    2018 doi

  45. [53]

    Barkai, V

    E. Barkai, V. Fleurov, and J. Klafter, Phys. Rev. E 61, 1164 (2000), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.61.1164

    2000 doi

  46. [54]

    H¨ oll, A

    M. H¨ oll, A. Nissan, B. Berkowitz, and E. Barkai, Phys. R ev. E 108, 034124 (2023), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.108.034124

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, C. W. Groth, and A. R. Akhmerov, Phys. Rev. B 79, 024204 (2009), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.024204

    2009 doi

  48. [56]

    Hamdi, S

    O. Hamdi, S. Burov, and E. Barkai, The European Physical Journal B 97 (2024), ISSN 1434-6036, URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjb/s10051-024-00704-5

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    Karatzas and S

    I. Karatzas and S. E. Schreve, Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus (Springer New York, NY, 2014), URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0949-2

    2014 doi

  50. [58]

    Dechant, E

    A. Dechant, E. Lutz, D. A. Kessler, and E. Barkai, Phys. R ev. Lett. 107, 240603 (2011), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.240603

    2011 doi

  51. [59]

    O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen and N. Shephard, Journal of the R oyal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodolo gy) 63, 167 (2001), ISSN 1369-7412, URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2680596

    2001

  52. [60]

    Chicheportiche and J.-P

    R. Chicheportiche and J.-P. Bouchaud, in First-Passage Phenomena and Their Applications , edited by R. Metzler, G. Oshanin, and S. Redner (World Scientific, 20 14), chap. 1, pp. 447–476, URL https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9789814590297_0018

    doi

  53. [61]

    Tong and A

    Z. Tong and A. Liu, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 566, 125619 (2021), ISSN 0378-4371, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437120309171

    2021

  54. [62]

    Li, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 75, 1044 (2018), ISSN 0898-1221, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898122117306880

    P. Li, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 75, 1044 (2018), ISSN 0898-1221, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898122117306880

    2018

  55. [63]

    Nickelsen and H

    D. Nickelsen and H. Touchette, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 090602 (2018), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.090602. 27

    2018 doi

  56. [64]

    Meerson, Phys

    B. Meerson, Phys. Rev. E 100, 042135 (2019), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.100.042135

    2019 doi

  57. [65]

    N. R. Smith, Phys. Rev. E 105, 014120 (2022), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.105.014120

    2022 doi

  58. [66]

    R. L. Jack and R. J. Harris, Phys. Rev. E 102, 012154 (2020), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.012154

    2020 doi

  59. [67]

    Alqahtani and T

    M. Alqahtani and T. Grafke, Journal of Physics A: Mathem atical and Theoretical 54, 175001 (2021), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/abe67b

    2021 doi

  60. [68]

    H. Chen, L. Tian, and G. Li, Phys. Rev. E 110, 064104 (2024), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.064104

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    Valov and B

    A. Valov and B. Meerson, Journal of Physics A: Mathemati cal and Theoretical 58, 095002 (2025), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/adb8ae

    2025 doi

  62. [70]

    N. R. Smith, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Ap plications 650, 129987 (2024), ISSN 0378-4371, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437124004965

    2024

  63. [71]

    D. A. Kessler and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 230602 (2012), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.230602

    2012 doi

  64. [72]

    Barkai, E

    E. Barkai, E. Aghion, and D. A. Kessler, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021036 (2014), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.021036

    2014 doi

  65. [73]

    Aghion, D

    E. Aghion, D. A. Kessler, and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 260601 (2017), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.260601

    2017 doi

  66. [74]

    Redner, A Guide to First-Passage Processes (Cambridge University Press, 2013), URL https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606014

    S. Redner, A Guide to First-Passage Processes (Cambridge University Press, 2013), URL https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606014

    2013 doi

  67. [75]

    C. W. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Methods: for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences (3rd ed.) (Springer Berlin, 2004)

    2004

  68. [76]

    N. G. Van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, Third Editi on (North-Holland Personal Library, 2013), URL https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52965-7.X5000-4

    2013 doi

  69. [77]

    Sarmiento, D

    Y. Sarmiento, D. Das, and E. Roldan, Indian Journal of Ph ysics (2024), ISSN 0974-9845, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12648-024-03182-8

    2024 doi

  70. [78]

    Matsumoto and M

    T. Matsumoto and M. Takaoka, Phys. Rev. E 87, 013008 (2013), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.013008

    2013 doi

  71. [79]

    Nickelsen, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theor y and Experiment 2017, 073209 (2017), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/aa786a

    D. Nickelsen, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theor y and Experiment 2017, 073209 (2017), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/aa786a

    2017 doi

  72. [80]

    S. N. Majumdar, Brownian Functionals in Physics and Computer Science (World Scientific Publisher, 2005), pp. 93–129, URL https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9789812772718_0006

    2005 doi

  73. [81]

    Dechant, F

    A. Dechant, F. Kindermann, A. Widera, and E. Lutz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070602 (2019), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.070602

    2019 doi

  74. [82]

    G. Afek, N. Davidson, D. A. Kessler, and E. Barkai, Rev. M od. Phys. 95, 031003 (2023), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.031003

    2023 doi

  75. [83]

    Metzler and J

    R. Metzler and J. Klafter, Physics Reports 339, 1 (2000), ISSN 0370-1573, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157300000703

    2000

  76. [84]

    Kutner and J

    R. Kutner and J. Masoliver, The European Physical Journ al B 90 (2017), ISSN 1434-6036, URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjb/e2016-70578-3

    2017 doi

  77. [85]

    L. M. Ricciardi and S. Sato, Journal of Applied Probabil ity 25, 43 (1988), ISSN 00219002, URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/3214232

    1988

  78. [86]

    A. G. Nobile, L. M. Ricciardi, and L. Sacerdote, Journal of Applied Probability 22, 360–369 (1985), URL https://doi.org/10.2307/3213779

    1985 doi

  79. [87]

    Giorgini, W

    L. Giorgini, W. Moon, and J. S. Wettlaufer, Journal of St atistical Physics 181, 2404 (2020), URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-020-02669-y

    2020 doi

  80. [88]

    M. J. Kearney and R. J. Martin, Journal of Physics A: Math ematical and Theoretical 54, 055002 (2021), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/abd677

    2021 doi

  81. [89]

    Lipton and V

    A. Lipton and V. Kaushansky, On the First Hitting Time Density of an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck P rocess (2018), 1810.02390

    2018 arXiv

  82. [90]

    M. J. Kearney and S. N. Majumdar, Journal of Physics A: Ma thematical and General 38, 4097 (2005), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/38/19/004

    2005 doi

  83. [91]

    Dechant, E

    A. Dechant, E. Lutz, D. A. Kessler, and E. Barkai, Phys. R ev. X 4, 011022 (2014), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011022

    2014 doi

  84. [92]

    Meyer, E

    P. Meyer, E. Barkai, and H. Kantz, Phys. Rev. E 96, 062122 (2017), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.062122

    2017 doi

  85. [93]

    D. J. Searles and D. J. Evans, The Journal of Chemical Phy sics 112, 9727 (2000), ISSN 0021-9606, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481610

    2000 doi

  86. [94]

    Defaveri, E

    L. Defaveri, E. Barkai, and D. A. Kessler, Phys. Rev. E 109, L022102 (2024), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.L022102

    2024 doi

  87. [95]

    Defaveri, E

    L. Defaveri, E. Barkai, and D. A. Kessler, A tale of three approaches: dynamical phase transitions for weakly bound brownian particles (2024), 2407.16598, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16598

    2024 arXiv

  88. [96]

    S. N. Majumdar and B. Meerson, Journal of Statistical Me chanics: Theory and Experiment 2020, 023202 (2020), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ab6844

    2020 doi

  89. [97]

    Nickelsen and H

    D. Nickelsen and H. Touchette, Phys. Rev. E 105, 064102 (2022), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.105.064102. 28

    2022 doi

  90. [98]

    R. K. Singh and S. Burov, Phys. Rev. E 108, L052102 (2023), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.108.L052102

    2023 doi

  91. [99]

    Y. R. Yerrababu, S. N. Majumdar, and T. Sadhu, Dynamical phase transitions in certain non-ergodic stocha stic processes (2024), 2412.19516, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19516

    2024

  92. [100]

    K. R. Duffy and S. P. Meyn, Performance Evaluation 67, 1290 (2010), ISSN 0166-5316, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166531610000830

    2010

  93. [101]

    Blanchet, P

    J. Blanchet, P. Glynn, and S. Meyn, Queueing Systems 73, 425 (2013), URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11134-013-9349-7

    2013 doi

  94. [102]

    K. R. Duffy and S. P. Meyn, Stochastic Systems 4, 300 (2014), URL https://doi.org/10.1214/13-SSY098

    2014 doi

  95. [103]

    Bazhba, J

    M. Bazhba, J. Blanchet, C.-H. Rhee, and B. Zwart, Mathem atics of Operations Research 0, null (0), https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2020.0094, URL https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2020.0094

    2020

  96. [104]

    Bazhba, J

    M. Bazhba, J. Blanchet, R. J. A. Laeven, and B. Zwart, Large deviations asymptotics for unbounded additive funct ionals of diffusion processes (2023), 2202.10799, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.10799

    2023 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Chen, C.-H

    B. Chen, C.-H. Rhee, and B. Zwart, Electronic Journal of Probability 29, 1 (2024), URL https://doi.org/10.1214/24-EJP1115

    2024 doi

  98. [106]

    Ferr´ e, Heavy tailed large deviations for time averages of diffusions : the ornstein-uhlenbeck case (2024), 2402.16992, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16992

    G. Ferr´ e, Heavy tailed large deviations for time averages of diffusions : the ornstein-uhlenbeck case (2024), 2402.16992, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16992

    2024 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Ferr´ e,A subexponential version of cramer’s theorem (2022), 2206.05791, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.05791

    G. Ferr´ e,A subexponential version of cramer’s theorem (2022), 2206.05791, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.05791

    2022 arXiv

  100. [108]

    N. E. Korotkov and A. N. Korotkov, Integrals Related to the Error Function (Taylor & Francis Group, 2020), URL https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367809232

    2020 doi

  101. [109]

    C. M. Bender and S. Orzsag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineer s I (Springer New York, NY, 1999), URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3069-2

    1999 doi

  102. [110]

    For even and odd n we use ⟨A2⟩ − ⟨A⟩2 ∼ 2DnT where ⟨A⟩ = 0 for odd n

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.