Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evaluating Biases in Context-Dependent Health Questions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04858 v1 pith:TQ6WRAGC submitted 2024-03-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords questionsbiaseshealthcareattributescontextcontextuallanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Chat-based large language models have the opportunity to empower individuals lacking high-quality healthcare access to receive personalized information across a variety of topics. However, users may ask underspecified questions that require additional context for a model to correctly answer. We study how large language model biases are exhibited through these contextual questions in the healthcare domain. To accomplish this, we curate a dataset of sexual and reproductive healthcare questions that are dependent on age, sex, and location attributes. We compare models' outputs with and without demographic context to determine group alignment among our contextual questions. Our experiments reveal biases in each of these attributes, where young adult female users are favored.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Addressing Bias in Generative AI: Challenges and Research Opportunities in Information Management

    cs.CY 2025-01 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A position paper synthesizes LLM bias research and proposes a stakeholder-based research agenda for information management, without presenting new empirical results.

Pith tools