Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Explaining Anomalies using Denoising Autoencoders for Financial Tabular Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.10658 v2 pith:TQWXC2YS submitted 2022-09-21 cs.LG cs.CE

classification cs.LGcs.CE
keywords anomaliesautoencoderscelldatadenoisingdesigneddomaintabular
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in Explainable AI (XAI) increased the demand for deployment of safe and interpretable AI models in various industry sectors. Despite the latest success of deep neural networks in a variety of domains, understanding the decision-making process of such complex models still remains a challenging task for domain experts. Especially in the financial domain, merely pointing to an anomaly composed of often hundreds of mixed type columns, has limited value for experts. Hence, in this paper, we propose a framework for explaining anomalies using denoising autoencoders designed for mixed type tabular data. We specifically focus our technique on anomalies that are erroneous observations. This is achieved by localizing individual sample columns (cells) with potential errors and assigning corresponding confidence scores. In addition, the model provides the expected cell value estimates to fix the errors. We evaluate our approach based on three standard public tabular datasets (Credit Default, Adult, IEEE Fraud) and one proprietary dataset (Holdings). We find that denoising autoencoders applied to this task already outperform other approaches in the cell error detection rates as well as in the expected value rates. Additionally, we analyze how a specialized loss designed for cell error detection can further improve these metrics. Our framework is designed for a domain expert to understand abnormal characteristics of an anomaly, as well as to improve in-house data quality management processes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Generative Models for Tabular Data: Novel Metrics and Benchmarking

    cs.LG 2025-04 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper adapts FID and Inception Score to tabular data as FAED, FPCAD, and RFIS, and reports that FAED is the most sensitive to injected noise, mode drop, and mode collapse across three intrusion detection datasets.

  2. Tabular Data Adapters: Improving Outlier Detection for Unlabeled Private Data

    cs.LG 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Tabular Data Adapters select similar public datasets, transform unlabeled private data into their format, and fuse public outlier model outputs into soft labels.

Pith tools