$H-T$ Phase diagram of CeRh$_{2}$As$_{2}$: Refinement of the parity-switch scenario

Changhee Lee; P. M. R. Brydon

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 31 references

$H-T$ Phase diagram of CeRh$_{2}$As$_{2}$: Refinement of the parity-switch scenario

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Anisotropic bands near X and coexisting antiferromagnetism refine the parity-switch picture of CeRh2As2, fixing both the steeper high-field slope and the nearly vertical thermodynamic boundary.

desk verdict Clean refinement of the parity-switch picture for CeRh2As2: large t_perp anisotropizes the X-point Dirac cone to fix the transport slope ratio, and AFM coupling can drive effective chi_P negative for the odd-parity state. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.04928 v1 pith:TR2VFVVV submitted 2026-07-06 cond-mat.supr-con

Changhee Lee , P. M. R. Brydon This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.supr-con

keywords CeRh2As2parity-switchsuperconductivitynonsymmorphicbandstructuretype-IIVanHovesingularityodd-paritypairingantiferromagneticcoexistenceH-TphasediagramGinzburg-Landautheory

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

CeRh2As2 shows two superconducting phases separated by a first-order transition that is usually attributed to a parity switch between even- and odd-parity singlet states, enabled by strong Rashba spin-orbit coupling on the locally non-centrosymmetric lattice. Real H-T diagrams deviate from that simple picture: transport data give a steeper initial slope for the high-field (odd-parity) phase than for the low-field phase, while thermodynamic data show a nearly vertical high-field boundary that seems to ignore orbital depairing. The paper shows that nonsymmorphic symmetries produce a Dirac node and type-II Van Hove points near the X point whose dispersion becomes strongly anisotropic once interlayer hopping exceeds the Rashba scale; this anisotropy suppresses the gradient stiffness of the staggered gap relative to the uniform gap while leaving the condensation energies comparable, thereby reversing the expected slope ratio. Separately, a Landau free energy that couples both superconducting order parameters to a coexisting antiferromagnetic order demonstrates that the AFM order can over-compensate the already-weak Pauli depairing of the odd-parity state, producing an effective field-enhanced boundary that appears nearly vertical. Together the two mechanisms restore consistency with experiment without abandoning the parity-switch framework.

What carries the argument

The k·p Hamiltonian around X (interlayer hopping linear in kx plus anisotropic Rashba terms) together with the projected even- and odd-parity gap magnitudes on the valence-band Fermi surface; these enter the microscopic expressions for the Ginzburg-Landau coefficients a0 and K0 whose ratio controls the initial slope of Hc2.

What would settle it

Angle-resolved photoemission or quantum-oscillation measurements that place the Fermi level far from the valence-band Van Hove energy, or that find interlayer hopping weaker than the Rashba scale, would eliminate the microscopic origin of the steeper odd-parity slope.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The anomalous initial slope of the odd-parity superconducting phase arises from the anisotropic electronic structure around the symmetry-enforced Dirac node and type-II Van Hove saddle points near X when interlayer hopping is large; the same anisotropic structure keeps the even- and odd-parity condensation energies nearly equal. Coexisting antiferromagnetism then renormalizes the Pauli coefficient of the odd-parity state to a negative value, generating the nearly vertical thermodynamic phase boundary observed above the first-order transition.

Load-bearing premise

The Fermi level must sit near the valence-band type-II Van Hove singularity and interlayer hopping must be large compared with Rashba spin-orbit coupling, otherwise the Dirac-cone anisotropy that reverses the slope ratio disappears.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper does two concrete things that matter for CeRh2As2. First, it shows that when interlayer hopping dominates Rashba SOC, the symmetry-enforced Dirac cone plus type-II VHS near X makes the Fermi velocity highly anisotropic; the staggered (odd-parity) gap is then suppressed precisely where velocity is largest, so K0 drops while a0 stays comparable. That reverses the usual GL expectation and can produce a steeper initial slope for the high-field phase, matching the transport diagram. Second, a standard multi-order Landau free energy with AFM-SC coupling yields a negative effective Pauli coefficient for the odd-parity channel, giving the nearly vertical thermodynamic boundary above the first-order line.

Both pieces are transparent. The k·p projection (Eq. 9) and the tight-binding scans (Fig. 4) cleanly demonstrate the slope-ratio effect once t_perp/alpha is large and the Fermi level sits near the valence-band VHS. The Landau construction (Eqs. 11–17) is thermodynamically consistent and reproduces the published phase boundaries for H < 10 T with parameters that satisfy the coexistence condition. Citations are appropriate; the microscopic expressions for a0 and K0 are standard.

The soft spots are real but limited. The slope argument lives or dies on the large-t_perp and VHS-proximity assumptions; if the real FS is not VHS-dominated or interlayer hopping is weak, that half of the story collapses. The thermodynamic fit extracts most of its coefficients from the same data it then “explains,” so there is mild circularity, though the mechanism itself (over-compensation of Pauli depairing) is still a useful idea. Neither issue is fatal; both are the usual price of analytic/phenomenological work on a complicated heavy-fermion compound.

This is for people already working on CeRh2As2 or locally non-centrosymmetric superconductors. It does not reorganize the broader field, but it supplies a concrete, previously missing link between nonsymmorphic band structure, AFM order, and the two anomalous features of the H–T diagram. I would send it to referees without hesitation; the math is solid and the claims are falsifiable by better ARPES or pressure studies. Worth reading and, if you work in this corner, worth citing.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper refines the parity-switch scenario for CeRh2As2 by addressing two anomalies in the experimental H–T phase diagrams. Using a nonsymmorphic k·p model around the X-point Dirac node and type-II van Hove singularities (Eqs. 7–9), together with a two-sublattice tight-binding Hamiltonian (Eq. 10), it shows that large interlayer hopping relative to Rashba SOC produces anisotropic Fermi velocities that suppress the gradient coefficient K0 for the staggered (odd-parity) gap while leaving a0 comparable, thereby yielding a steeper initial slope for the high-field SC phase (Figs. 3–4). A phenomenological Landau free energy that couples even- and odd-parity SC order parameters to an AFM order parameter (Eqs. 11–17) then accounts for the nearly vertical thermodynamic boundary above the first-order transition as an over-compensation of Pauli depairing (negative effective χ̃P) for the odd-parity state coexisting with AFM order (Fig. 5).

Significance. If the band-structure premise holds, the work supplies a concrete, symmetry-based mechanism for the anomalous transport slope ratio that is missing from the conventional parity-switch picture, and a thermodynamically consistent explanation for the vertical thermodynamic boundary. The microscopic expressions for a0 and K0 (Eqs. 2–3), the projection of the staggered gap (Eq. 9), and the explicit tight-binding scans of the slope ratio (Fig. 4) are clean and falsifiable once ARPES or DFT constraints on t⊥/α and VHS proximity become available. The Landau construction is standard yet usefully isolates the field-enhancement mechanism. These refinements are of clear interest to the heavy-fermion and locally non-centrosymmetric superconductivity communities.

major comments (2)

The central microscopic claim (steeper oSC slope) rests on the assumption that the Fermi level lies near the valence-band type-II VHS and that t⊥/α is large enough for strong Dirac-cone anisotropy (Eqs. 7–9 and the solid/dashed curves of Fig. 4). The manuscript cites ARPES reports of VHSs near X but does not quantify how close the chemical potential must be, nor does it confront existing DFT or ARPES estimates of the interlayer-to-Rashba ratio. Without such a comparison the slope-ratio explanation remains conditional; a short paragraph or SM table confronting published band parameters would substantially strengthen the claim.
In the thermodynamic analysis the bare SC parameters (T_c0, χ_O, χ_P) are extracted from the same transport phase boundary that is later re-used, together with the thermodynamic data, to fix the AFM couplings g/b_A and b/b_A (Fig. 5 caption and surrounding text). While the resulting free energy is thermodynamically consistent, the procedure introduces mild circularity: the “explanation” of the vertical boundary is partly a re-parametrization of the data used to define the bare coefficients. An independent microscopic estimate of at least one coupling (or a clear statement that the fit is phenomenological only) would remove this ambiguity.

minor comments (4)

Fig. 1 caption and the accompanying text refer to “green line” and “orange dashed line” that are not fully self-explanatory without the figure; a one-sentence clarification of what each schematic line represents would help.
The statement “T_c^(o)/T_c^(e) = 0.85 is used” appears without derivation; a brief note on how this ratio is chosen (or that it is a free parameter scanned in the SM) would improve transparency.
Several references to the Supplemental Material (e.g., for the multi-band contribution and s-wave comparison) are given only as “[14]”; once the SM is finalized, explicit section numbers would aid the reader.
Typographical inconsistencies appear in the free-energy coefficients (sometimes χ_O, sometimes χ^(p)_O) and in the notation for the first-order field (H*_1 vs H_1); a uniform choice would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Microscopic slope-ratio argument is independent once band parameters are granted; thermodynamic 'explanation' of the nearly-vertical boundary is partly a fit of the same phase-boundary data that is then reproduced.

fitted input called prediction [Coexisting AFM order section; Eqs. (14)-(17) and Fig. 5 caption]
"Ignoring the AFM order parameter, we obtain two ground states from F_Delta^(p) whose boundaries against the normal phase are given by T_c^(p)=T_c0^(p)(1-chi_O^(p) H_z - chi_P^(p) H_z^2). T_c0^(p), chi_P^(p), and chi_O^(p) ... are obtained by using the phase boundary determined by resistivity in H_z < 10 T ... The parameters T0, g^(p)/b_A, and b^(p)/b_A are extracted from the thermodynamic phase boundary data in Ref. [8] ... The curved red lines Fig. 5 represent T_c^(p)(H_z) of coexisting phases fitted to the thermodynamic data."

Bare SC coefficients are fixed to the transport phase boundary; AFM-SC couplings are then fitted to the thermodynamic phase-boundary points that the free energy is subsequently claimed to explain (nearly-vertical oSC+AFM line via negative chi_P tilde in Eq. 17). The reproduction of that boundary is therefore statistically forced by the fit rather than an independent prediction from the Landau free energy.

full rationale

The paper has two largely independent pieces. The transport-slope analysis (k·p Hamiltonian around X, projected gaps Eq. 9, integrands of a0 and K0 in Eqs. 2-3, tight-binding scans of Fig. 4) is a genuine microscopic calculation: once t_perp/alpha is large and the Fermi level sits near the valence-band type-II VHS, K0^(o) is suppressed relative to K0^(e) while a0 remains comparable, so the initial-slope ratio can exceed T_c^(o)/T_c^(e). That chain does not reduce to its inputs by construction. The thermodynamic part, however, extracts the bare SC parameters (T_c0, chi_O, chi_P) from the transport phase boundary and the AFM-SC couplings (g/b_A, b/b_A, T0, chi_A) from the thermodynamic phase-boundary data of Refs. [8,10]; the free energy (Eqs. 11-17) is then said to 'explain' the nearly-vertical oSC+AFM boundary via a negative effective chi_P tilde. Because the same data that define the target boundary are used to fix the free-energy coefficients, the reproduction of that boundary is partly tautological. The mechanism (over-compensation of Pauli depairing) remains a legitimate interpretation of the fitted signs, but the central thermodynamic claim is not an independent prediction. Score 5 reflects one clear fitted-input-called-prediction step that is load-bearing for half the paper, while the microscopic half is free of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Central claims rest on a standard Ginzburg-Landau orbital-limit framework, a nonsymmorphic k·p Hamiltonian taken from prior work, a phenomenological multi-order free energy, and several free parameters fitted to the experimental phase boundaries. No new particles or forces are invented; the 'entities' are modeling choices (VHS proximity, large t_perp/alpha, AFM-SC coupling) whose independent evidence is only partial.

free parameters (4)

t_perp / alpha ratio
Scanned by hand in the tight-binding model (Fig. 4) to obtain slope ratios >1; not fixed by independent measurement in the paper.
T_c^(o)/T_c^(e) = 0.85
Bare transition-temperature ratio fixed by hand to keep channels nearly degenerate while illustrating the slope effect.
Landau coefficients (T_c0, chi_O, chi_P, g/b_A, b/b_A, T0, chi_A)
Extracted by fitting transport and thermodynamic phase boundaries (Fig. 5 caption lists explicit numerical values); the vertical-boundary claim depends on these fitted numbers.
hopping parameters t0, t', mu relative to VHS
Chosen so that the Fermi level sits at the valence-band VHS and bandwidth is fixed; controls which band dominates a0 and K0.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Ginzburg-Landau free energy truncated at quartic order with orbital depairing captured by covariant derivatives (Eq. 1) is sufficient for the initial-slope analysis.
Standard for clean type-II superconductors near Tc; Pauli term neglected at weak fields.
domain assumption Nonsymmorphic symmetries enforce a Dirac node at X and convert the saddle into type-II VHSs (k·p Hamiltonian Eq. 7).
Taken from prior literature (Refs. 20, 24, 25); used as input for the anisotropy argument.
domain assumption Even- and odd-parity gaps are B1g and B2u singlets with form factors psi_k tau0 s0 and psi_k tauz s0, projected onto bands (Eq. 9).
Consistent with earlier microscopic calculations for CeRh2As2; interband pairing neglected.
ad hoc to paper AFM and SC order parameters couple only through a biquadratic term g|Delta|^2 S^2 in the Landau free energy (Eq. 11).
Phenomenological choice that enables the over-compensation mechanism; higher-order or gradient couplings omitted.
domain assumption Transport phase boundary reflects intrinsic SC properties free of bulk AFM, while thermodynamic boundary includes bulk AFM-SC coexistence.
Justified by disorder-sensitivity arguments and pressure data, but remains an interpretive assumption.

invented entities (1)

Field-enhanced odd-parity SC via AFM over-suppression of Pauli depairing
purpose: Explains the nearly vertical thermodynamic phase boundary as a negative effective chi_P tilde.
Emerges from the fitted Landau free energy rather than from a microscopic calculation of the AFM-SC coupling; independent microscopic evidence is not provided.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $H-T$ Phase diagram of CeRh$_{2}$As$_{2}$: Refinement of the parity-switch scenario." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TR2VFVVV

@misc{pith2026260704928,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $H-T$ Phase diagram of CeRh$_2$As$_2$: Refinement of the parity-switch scenario},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TR2VFVVV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.04928}
}

abstract

The superconductivity of CeRh$_2$As$_2$ has drawn attention due to its first-order transition in magnetic fields. At first glance, the multiple superconducting (SC) phases as well as the first-order transition appear consistent with the parity-switch scenario, which emphasizes the role of strong Rashba spin-orbit coupling enabled by the locally non-centrosymmetric crystal structure. However, experimental phase diagrams exhibit notable deviations from this simple picture: thermodynamic measurements reveal a nearly vertical phase boundary of the high-field SC phase despite the orbital depairing effect, while transport measurements show that the initial slope of the high-field SC phase is steeper than that of the low-field SC phase. Here, we show that these discrepancies can be understood by considering the combined effects of nonsymmorphic band structure and coexisting antiferromagnetic order. We demonstrate that the symmetry-enforced electronic structure around the Dirac node and type-II Van Hove saddle points near the X point in the Brillouin zone boundary becomes more anisotropic with increased interlayer hopping amplitude, and this anisotropic band structure naturally accounts for the anomalous initial slope of the odd-parity SC phase. Meanwhile, a phenomenological theory incorporating coexisting antiferromagnetism explains the nearly vertical thermodynamic phase boundary as a consequence of field-enhanced odd-parity superconductivity enabled by the over-suppression of Pauli depairing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.04928 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Schematic field-temperature (H − T) phase diagrams of CeRh2As2 in magnetic fields along c-axis. (a) Transport phase diagram of the superconducting phases. The dotted line denotes the first order phase transition occurring at H = H∗ 1 . The dashed line is an extrapolation of the phase boundary in H > H∗ 1 . The green line depicts a fictitious example of the phase boundary in H < H∗ 1 which is consistent with the … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Fermi surfaces of the conduction and the valence bands. (a) (t⊥, α) = (2, 5)t0 and (b) (t⊥, α) = (5, 2)t0 are used. The red points highlight the Van Hove saddle points. The curves passing through the red points represent the Fermi surfaces of the valence (conduction) band at µ = µv (µ = µc). The black arrows mark the midpoints of the red curves and correspond to the origin of the figures in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** The ratio (∂H(o) c,2 /∂T(o) c,0 )/(∂H(e) c,2 /∂T(e) c,0 ) of the initial slopes for several (t⊥, α) with t ′ = 0.1t. (a) shows the results obtained from the tight-binding model with √ t 2 ⊥ + α2 = t0. (b) shows the results with √ t 2 ⊥ + α2 = 8t0. The solid lines represent the contribution only from the valence band in Eqs. (2-3), while the dashed lines represent the contribution from all bands. Two black lines m… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Phase diagram obtained from Eqs. (14-16). The orange diamonds represent the resistivity measurement in Ref. [8], while the other symbols correspond to the thermodynamic data presented in Ref. [10]. The black dashed lines represent the phase boundaries between the norm…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

[1]

3 K) than in the transport measurements ( T (e) c, res ≈
[2]

However, the ﬁrst order transition is found to occur almost at the same magnetic ﬁeld H ∗ 1 ≈ 4 T in both types of measurements

4 K). However, the ﬁrst order transition is found to occur almost at the same magnetic ﬁeld H ∗ 1 ≈ 4 T in both types of measurements. The onset of the antifer- romagnetism is evidenced in thermodynamic measure- ments, while it is not observed in transport measurements ∗ changhee.lee@otago.ac.nz † philip.brydon@otago.ac.nz on low quality sample. Recent me...

arXiv 2026
[3]

When expanded around the X point of the FBZ, Hk is turned intoH (X) k in Eq

− µ, and ⃗ αk = α(sinky, − sinkx, 0). When expanded around the X point of the FBZ, Hk is turned intoH (X) k in Eq. ( 7) with understanding a +b = 2t0 and b −a = 4t′. The hopping parameters are scaled to keep the band- width W = 8 ˜t0 ﬁxed to 8 so that ˜t0 reduces to t0 in the absence of t⊥ and αfor |t′|< |t0|/ 2. This tight-binding model let us compare th...
[4]

S. Khim, J. F. Landaeta, J. Banda, N. Bannor, M. Brando, P. M. R. Brydon, D. Hafner, R. Küch- ler, R. Cardoso-Gil, U. Stockert, A. P. Mackenzie, D. F. Agterberg, C. Geibel, and E. Hassinger, Field- induced transition within the superconducting state of CeRh2As2, Science 373, 1012 (2021)

2021
[5]

Yoshida, M

T. Yoshida, M. Sigrist, and Y. Yanase, Pair-density wave states through spin-orbit coupling in multilayer super- conductors, Phys. Rev. B 86, 134514 (2012)

2012
[6]

S. Khim, O. Stockert, M. Brando, C. Geibel, C. Baines, T. J. Hicken, H. Leutkens, D. Das, T. Shiroka, Z. Guguchia, and R. Scheuermann, Coexistence of local magnetism and superconductivity in the heavy-fermion CeRh2As2 revealed by µSR studies (2024), 2406.16575

arXiv 2024
[7]

Kibune, S

M. Kibune, S. Kitagawa, K. Kinjo, S. Ogata, M. Man- ago, T. Taniguchi, K. Ishida, M. Brando, E. Hassinger, H. Rosner, C. Geibel, and S. Khim, Observation of Anti- ferromagnetic Order as Odd-Parity Multipoles inside the Superconducting Phase in CeRh2As2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 057002 (2022)

2022
[8]

Ogata, S

S. Ogata, S. Kitagawa, K. Kinjo, K. Ishida, M. Brando, E. Hassinger, C. Geibel, and S. Khim, Parity Transition of Spin-Singlet Superconductivity Using Sublattice De- grees of Freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 166001 (2023)

2023

Show all 31 references

[9]

Galeski, C

S. Galeski, C. Lee, F. Bartl, J. Sourd, S. Zherlitsyn, A. T. M. Breugelmans, R. Amdouni, P. Khanenko, 7 E. Hassinger, S. Khim, J. Wosnitza, P. Thalmeier, P. M. R. Brydon, and M. Brando, Investigation of CeRh2As2 order parameters via ultrasound propagation anomalies (2026), arX...

2026
[10]

Semeniuk, D

K. Semeniuk, D. Hafner, P. Khanenko, T. Lühmann, J. Banda, J. F. Landaeta, C. Geibel, S. Khim, E. Has- singer, and M. Brando, Decoupling multiphase supercon- ductivity from normal state ordering in CeRh 2As2, Phys. Rev. B 107, L220504 (2023)

2023
[11]

Semeniuk, M

K. Semeniuk, M. Pfeiﬀer, J. F. Landaeta, M. Nicklas, C. Geibel, M. Brando, S. Khim, and E. Hassinger, Expos- ing the odd-parity superconductivity in CeRh 2As2 with hydrostatic pressure, Phys. Rev. B 110, L100504 (2024)

2024
[12]

Pfeiﬀer, K

M. Pfeiﬀer, K. Semeniuk, J. F. Landaeta, R. Borth, C. Geibel, M. Nicklas, M. Brando, S. Khim, and E. Has- singer, Pressure-Tuned Quantum Criticality in the Lo- cally Noncentrosymmetric Superconductor CeRh2As2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 126506 (2024)

2024
[13]

Khanenko, J

P. Khanenko, J. F. Landaeta, S. Ruet, T. Lühmann, K. Semeniuk, M. Pelly, A. W. Rost, G. Chajewski, D. Kaczorowski, C. Geibel, S. Khim, E. Hassinger, and M. Brando, Phase diagram of CeRh 2As2 for out-of-plane magnetic ﬁeld, Phys. Rev. B 112, L060501 (2025)

2025
[14]

G.-H. Kim, M. Park, S. Samanta, U. Choi, B. Kang, U. Seo, G. Ji, S. Noh, D.-Y. Cho, J.-W. Yoo, J. M. Ok, H.-S. Kim, and C. Sohn, Suppression of antiferromag- netic order by strain-enhanced frustration in honeycomb cobaltate, Science Advances 10, eadn8694 (2024)

2024
[15]

E. G. Schertenleib, M. H. Fischer, and M. Sigrist, Un- usual H−T phase diagram of CeRh2As2: The role of staggered noncentrosymmetricity, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023179 (2021)

2021
[16]

L. P. Gor’kov and T. K. Melik-Barkhudarov, Micro- scopic derivation of the Ginzburg-Landau equations for an anisotropic superconductor, Sov. Phys. JETP 18, 1031 (1964)

1964
[17]

( 11), the ﬁtting pro- cedure of the experimental data to the semiclassical for- mula, derivation of K and a(T ) from microscopic Hamil- tonian, derivation of Eqs

See the Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] providing the thermodynamic consistency of the Landau free energy in Eq. ( 11), the ﬁtting pro- cedure of the experimental data to the semiclassical for- mula, derivation of K and a(T ) from microscopic Hamil...
[18]

Cyrot, Ginzburg-Landau theory for superconductors, Rep

M. Cyrot, Ginzburg-Landau theory for superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys. 36, 103 (1973)

1973
[19]

A. L. Szabó, M. H. Fischer, and M. Sigrist, Eﬀects of nucleation at a ﬁrst-order transition between two super- conducting phases: Application to cerh2as2, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023080 (2024)

2024
[20]

Shumei, Z

L. Shumei, Z. Dianlin, J. Xiunian, L. Li, L. Shanlin, K. Ning, W. Xiaosong, and J. J. Lin, Upper critical ﬁeld of Ti and α-TiAl alloys: Evidence of an intrinsic type- II superconductivity in pure Ti, Phys. Rev. B 62, 8695 (2000)

2000
[21]

T. P. Orlando, E. J. McNiﬀ, S. Foner, M. R. Beasley, T. P. Orlando, E. J. McNiﬀ, S. Foner, and M. R. Beasley, Critical ﬁelds, Pauli paramagnetic limiting, and material parameters of Nb 3Sn and V 3Si, Phys. Rev. B 19, 4545 (1979)

1979
[22]

Yao and F

H. Yao and F. Yang, Topological odd-parity supercon- ductivity at type-II two-dimensional van Hove singulari- ties, Phys. Rev. B 92, 035132 (2015)

2015
[23]

C. Lee, D. F. Agterberg, and P. M. R. Brydon, Uni- ﬁed Picture of Superconductivity and Magnetism in CeRh2As2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 026003 (2025)

2025
[24]

X. Chen, L. Wang, J. Ishizuka, R. Zhang, K. Nogaki, Y. Cheng, F. Yang, Z. Chen, F. Zhu, Z. Liu, J. Mei, Y. Yanase, B. Lv, and Y. Huang, Coexistence of near- EF Flat Band and Van Hove Singularity in a Two-Phase Superconductor, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021048 (2024)

2024
[25]

B. Chen, H. Liu, Q.-Y. Wu, C. Zhang, X.-Q. Ye, Y.- Z. Zhao, J.-J. Song, X.-Y. Tian, B.-L. Tan, Z.-T. Liu, M. Ye, Z.-H. Chen, Y.-B. Huang, D.-W. Shen, Y.-H. Yuan, J. He, Y.-X. Duan, and J.-Q. Meng, Exploring possible Fermi surface nesting and the nature of heavy quasiparticles ...

2024
[26]

Y. Wu, Y. Zhang, S. Ju, Y. Hu, Y. Huang, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, H. Zheng, G. Yang, E.-O. Eljaouhari, B. Song, N. C. Plumb, F. Steglich, M. Shi, G. Zwicknagl, C. Cao, H. Yuan, and Y. Liu, Fermi Surface Nesting with Heavy Quasiparticles in the Locally Noncentrosymmetric Su- percond...

2024
[27]

H. G. Suh, Y. Yu, T. Shishidou, M. Weinert, P. M. R. Brydon, and D. F. Agterberg, Superconductivity of anomalous pseudospin in nonsymmorphic materials, Phys. Rev. Research 5, 033204 (2023)

2023
[28]

D. C. Cavanagh, T. Shishidou, M. Weinert, P. M. R. Bry- don, and D. F. Agterberg, Nonsymmorphic symmetry and ﬁeld-driven odd-parity pairing in CeRh 2As2, Phys. Rev. B 105, L020505 (2022)

2022
[29]

Nogaki and Y

K. Nogaki and Y. Yanase, Even-odd parity transition in strongly correlated locally noncentrosymmetric super- conductors: Application to CeRh2As2, Phys. Rev. B 106, L100504 (2022)

2022
[30]

S. K. Yip, T. Li, and P. Kumar, Thermodynamic con- siderations and the phase diagram of superconducting UPt3, Phys. Rev. B 43, 2742 (1991)

1991
[31]

[data url] will be added when this manuscript published

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

3 K) than in the transport measurements ( T (e) c, res ≈

[2] [2]

However, the ﬁrst order transition is found to occur almost at the same magnetic ﬁeld H ∗ 1 ≈ 4 T in both types of measurements

4 K). However, the ﬁrst order transition is found to occur almost at the same magnetic ﬁeld H ∗ 1 ≈ 4 T in both types of measurements. The onset of the antifer- romagnetism is evidenced in thermodynamic measure- ments, while it is not observed in transport measurements ∗ changhee.lee@otago.ac.nz † philip.brydon@otago.ac.nz on low quality sample. Recent me...

arXiv 2026

[3] [3]

When expanded around the X point of the FBZ, Hk is turned intoH (X) k in Eq

− µ, and ⃗ αk = α(sinky, − sinkx, 0). When expanded around the X point of the FBZ, Hk is turned intoH (X) k in Eq. ( 7) with understanding a +b = 2t0 and b −a = 4t′. The hopping parameters are scaled to keep the band- width W = 8 ˜t0 ﬁxed to 8 so that ˜t0 reduces to t0 in the absence of t⊥ and αfor |t′|< |t0|/ 2. This tight-binding model let us compare th...

[4] [4]

S. Khim, J. F. Landaeta, J. Banda, N. Bannor, M. Brando, P. M. R. Brydon, D. Hafner, R. Küch- ler, R. Cardoso-Gil, U. Stockert, A. P. Mackenzie, D. F. Agterberg, C. Geibel, and E. Hassinger, Field- induced transition within the superconducting state of CeRh2As2, Science 373, 1012 (2021)

2021

[5] [5]

Yoshida, M

T. Yoshida, M. Sigrist, and Y. Yanase, Pair-density wave states through spin-orbit coupling in multilayer super- conductors, Phys. Rev. B 86, 134514 (2012)

2012

[6] [6]

S. Khim, O. Stockert, M. Brando, C. Geibel, C. Baines, T. J. Hicken, H. Leutkens, D. Das, T. Shiroka, Z. Guguchia, and R. Scheuermann, Coexistence of local magnetism and superconductivity in the heavy-fermion CeRh2As2 revealed by µSR studies (2024), 2406.16575

arXiv 2024

[7] [7]

Kibune, S

M. Kibune, S. Kitagawa, K. Kinjo, S. Ogata, M. Man- ago, T. Taniguchi, K. Ishida, M. Brando, E. Hassinger, H. Rosner, C. Geibel, and S. Khim, Observation of Anti- ferromagnetic Order as Odd-Parity Multipoles inside the Superconducting Phase in CeRh2As2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 057002 (2022)

2022

[8] [8]

Ogata, S

S. Ogata, S. Kitagawa, K. Kinjo, K. Ishida, M. Brando, E. Hassinger, C. Geibel, and S. Khim, Parity Transition of Spin-Singlet Superconductivity Using Sublattice De- grees of Freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 166001 (2023)

2023