Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 30 references

X-ray measurements of gas distribution in a zero gap alkaline water electrolyzer

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read X-ray measurements of a zero-gap alkaline water electrolyzer find no isolating gas pockets or films in the gap, and the zero-gap configuration gives the lowest cell voltage.

desk verdict First direct X-ray look at gas in zero-gap alkaline electrolyzers, but the no-film claim is weaker than it looks. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08940 v1 pith:TS3VQLEP submitted 2024-11-13 physics.ins-det cond-mat.mtrl-sci

On-Yu Dung , Stephan Boden , Albertus W. Vreman , Niels G. Deen , Markus Schubert , Yali Tang This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ins-detcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords alkalinewaterelectrolysiszerogapX-rayradioscopyvoidfractiongasvolumebubbleselectro-osmoticcrossoverBruggemanmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to resolve a long-standing speculation about zero-gap alkaline electrolyzers: whether the unexpectedly high ohmic resistance comes from gas bubbles or a gas film trapped in the narrow space between the electrode and the diaphragm. The authors built a small cell with adjustable gaps from 0 to 300 µm and used X-ray radioscopy at 15 µm resolution to map the projected void fraction during electrolysis up to 0.54 A/cm². They found that the gap region always contains more gas than the bulk, but the gap void fraction is nearly independent of gap size at current densities below 0.3 A/cm², and no isolating gas pockets or films were observed. The zero-gap configuration gave the lowest cell voltage, and a Bruggeman-model estimate puts the maximum voltage penalty from gas in the gap at about 6% of the total cell voltage. The authors conclude that bubble trapping is not the explanation for zero-gap resistance, and that deliberate gaps cannot be justified as a way to let bubbles escape.

What carries the argument

The measurement is carried by 2D X-ray radioscopy: a microfocus X-ray source projects a cone beam through the cell onto a flat-panel detector, and Beer-Lambert attenuation is converted to void fraction using empty-cell and bubble-free full-cell reference images, giving $\alpha = 1 - (A_{\mathrm{exp}} - A_{\mathrm{empty}})/(A_{\mathrm{full}} - A_{\mathrm{empty}})$. For the gap region, the void fraction is read from a single vertical line at the gap center, under the assumption that the gap contents are homogeneous across its width, with a stated absolute error of ±5% from possible cell movement. A dynamic attenuation correction (Appendix A) accounts for electrolyte density drift and residual bubbles by scaling the full-cell reference with a time-dependent factor, using the vertical maximum of each column as the bubble-free estimate. The Bruggeman effective-conductivity relation $\lambda = \kappa(1-\langle\alpha_{\mathrm{gap}}\rangle)^{3/2}$ then translates the measured gap void fractions into estimates of the voltage penalty from gas.

What would settle it

Resolve the void fraction across the gap width with a tomographic scan or local conductivity probes at the same operating conditions; observing a void-rich layer along the electrode-diaphragm interface, or a strongly non-uniform void profile across a 100–300 µm gap, would falsify the no-film conclusion and invalidate the vertical-line extrapolation used for the voltage estimate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that in a zero/narrow-gap alkaline water electrolyzer, gas does not accumulate in the gap as an isolating film or pocket. The measured void fraction in the gap is consistently larger than in the bulk, yet it stays roughly constant along the cell height and is nearly insensitive to gap size for current densities up to 0.3 A/cm²; only the oxygen-gap void fraction shows a clear gap-size dependence at higher currents. The zero-gap cell (verified to be within 15 µm of true zero by CT) has the lowest cell voltage among all tested gaps up to 300 µm, and the estimated voltage loss caused by gap gas is at most 6% of the total cell voltage at the highest current density. The paper also reports that high-porosity nickel plate electrodes permit liquid crossover from the oxygen side to the hydrogen side, driving the oxygen-side void fraction above the hydrogen-side value, while low-porosity perforated foil electrodes suppress this crossover.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the gap contents are uniform across the gap width, because the void fraction is read from a single vertical line at the gap center; if gas were concentrated in a thin layer against the electrode or diaphragm, the measurement could miss the very film it concludes is absent.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The high area resistance of zero-gap cells must be attributed to contact resistance, diaphragm properties, or assembly compression rather than to trapped bubbles.
  • Introducing a deliberate 100–300 µm gap to improve bubble escape will not lower the cell voltage in this configuration; the zero-gap cell remains the most efficient.
  • For current densities below 0.3 A/cm², gap width is not a controlling parameter for gas holdup, so narrow-gap designs can be compared without correcting for gap size in this regime.
  • The measured void-fraction distributions provide a quantitative dataset that multiphase-flow models of alkaline electrolyzers can be tested against.
  • In cells with high-porosity electrodes, electro-osmotic liquid crossover can dominate the gas distribution and should be controlled; low-porosity foil electrodes are a practical way to suppress it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Read as a claim, the no-film conclusion is resolution-limited: the paper itself states that a sub-15 µm electrolyte layer between electrode and diaphragm cannot be excluded.
  • The homogeneity assumption for the gap is the main load-bearing premise; a tomographic or local-probe measurement of the void profile across the gap width would be the natural next test.
  • The Bruggeman estimate assumes spherical bubbles; if bubbles in the gap were elongated, the 6% voltage penalty could be an underestimate, though the X-ray images show no evidence of films.
  • The discrepancy with the earlier 200 µm optimum likely reflects differences in cell assembly and diaphragm compression rather than bubble escape; the paper itself flags this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports X-ray radioscopy measurements of void fraction in an in-house alkaline water electrolyzer with adjustable electrode-diaphragm gaps from 0 to 300 µm, at 15 µm spatial resolution and current densities up to 0.54 A/cm2. The gap void fraction is deduced from a vertical line at the center of the gap under a homogeneity assumption, with a claimed ±5% absolute error. The main reported findings are that void fraction in the bulk increases with height and current density, void fraction in the gap is always larger than in the bulk but hardly depends on gap size below 0.3 A/cm2, the zero-gap configuration gives the lowest cell voltage, no evidence of isolating gas pockets or films in the gaps was found, and liquid crossover from the O2 to the H2 side occurs with porous plate electrodes but is suppressed with foil-PMMA electrodes. The bubble contribution to cell voltage is estimated by combining the measured gap void fraction with the Bruggeman conductivity model.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper provides the first direct visualization of gas distribution in the gap of a zero-gap alkaline electrolyzer and challenges the widely invoked hypothesis that trapped bubbles or gas films are responsible for the high area resistance of zero-gap cells. The study has real strengths: the measurement concept is novel for this geometry, the image processing and calibration are documented in unusual detail, the dynamic attenuation correction is addressed explicitly, and the comparison of two electrode types with supporting liquid-level measurements gives a coherent picture of crossover behavior. These strengths make the paper a useful contribution even if some of the headline conclusions need qualification. The main risk is that the central negative claim about gas films is based on a center-line projection that cannot see exactly the morphology it is meant to rule out.

major comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A.1 and Abstract] The central claim 'No evidence of isolating gas pockets/films in the gaps' is underdetermined by the measurement as defined. In Appendix A.1, the gap void fraction αgap is obtained from a vertical line at the center of the gap, assuming homogeneity across the gap width, which is only 7–20 pixels wide and adjacent to strong X-ray artifacts from the dense nickel electrodes. A thin gas layer adhering to the electrode or diaphragm surface, which is precisely the morphology proposed in Refs. [9–13], would occupy off-center pixels and would be missed or masked by this estimator. The authors should either demonstrate cross-gap homogeneity using full-width attenuation profiles in artifact-free regions, or explicitly restrict the claim to the center plane of the gap and revise the abstract and conclusions accordingly.
  2. [Appendix A.4] The dynamic scaling factor for the bubble-free electrolyte attenuation is defined as k(t2,i) = <max_y(B_i)/<B0>_y>_x. This assumes that at every vertical column at least one pixel remains free of bubbles during the 'full' scans that actually contain residual gas. At current densities of 0.48 and 0.54 A/cm2, the paper itself reports plugs and dense bubbly flow (Section 3.1), making this assumption questionable. If bubbles remain at all heights in a column, max_y(B_i) underestimates the bubble-free attenuation and all void fractions are systematically inflated. The authors should quantify the sensitivity to this assumption, for example by comparing the max estimator with a high percentile or by bounding the bias from cases with known bubble-free reference scans.
  3. [Fig. 7 and Appendix A.1] The claim that the gap void fraction 'hardly depends on the gap size' is not supported with the reported uncertainty. The absolute error on αgap is ±5%, and the differences between gap sizes visible in Fig. 7 appear to be of the same order or smaller. As presented, Fig. 7 does not include the ±5% error bars or a statistical test, so the gap-size independence conclusion could be an artifact of the measurement uncertainty. The authors should overlay the stated error or provide a quantitative comparison that accounts for the ±5% absolute error.
  4. [Section 3.3 and Appendix B] The Bruggeman-based estimate of the bubble contribution to cell voltage depends on the electrolyte conductivity κ, but the electrolyte temperature was not measured during the radiography experiments. Appendix B assumes temperatures of 26, 31, 29, 34, and 32 °C for the five current densities, obtained from a separate occasion, and states that the electrolysis duration was not always the same. Since κ for KOH is strongly temperature-dependent, the claimed maximum 6% bubble voltage drop has an unquantified uncertainty. The authors should either provide a sensitivity analysis over a plausible temperature range or explicitly weaken the quantitative claim to reflect the missing in-situ temperature measurement.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] There is a typo in the Introduction: 'electrolyte amd lengthen' should be 'electrolyte and lengthen'.
  2. [Eq. (1) and Appendix A.2] The notation A_full(x,y,t) in Eq. (1) is used together with A_full,0(x,y) in Appendix A.2; the distinction between the time-varying full attenuation and the initial stationary value should be made explicit at the point of first use.
  3. [Fig. 8b] The voltage comparison in Fig. 8b is based on a single realization per condition, and the text says the temperature was 'similar' for each current density. The authors should report the actual measured temperatures or at least the range, since the comparison is used to support the zero-gap efficiency claim.
  4. [Appendix A.3] The statement that the mixing assumption changes the attenuation by only 'a few percent' should be quantified with the actual computed difference, so the reader can judge the magnitude of this modeling choice.
  5. [Fig. 12] The liquid-level change data in Fig. 12 are presented without error bars or spread across realizations; given the acknowledged effects of splashing and residual bubbles, an uncertainty estimate would strengthen the crossover comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the X-ray void-fraction data, measured cell voltages, and Bruggeman-based voltage-drop estimate are each independent of the claims they support.

full rationale

The paper's central measurements are direct X-ray radioscopy data processed by the Beer-Lambert relation (Eq. 1), with the gap void fraction taken from a defined vertical line assuming homogeneity across the gap (Appendix A.1). The 'no isolating gas pockets/films' conclusion is an interpretation of those images, not a fitted quantity constructed to reproduce that conclusion; the centre-line/homogeneity assumption is a possible bias that weakens the claim but does not make it circular. The bubble contribution to the cell potential (Sec. 3.3, Eqs. 2-4) uses the externally established Bruggeman correlation with no parameter fitted to the voltage outcome; the assumed electrolyte temperatures are stated inputs, not calibrated to force agreement. The zero-gap cell-voltage comparison (Fig. 8) is a direct measurement, and the crossover analysis is based on observed liquid-level changes. The only self-citation, Ref. [3], motivates the investigation but is not load-bearing for any derived result; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. The dynamic attenuation correction (Appendix A.4) contains a plausible upward bias if bubbles remain at all heights in a column, but this is an accuracy limitation, not a circular reduction of a prediction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurement relies on standard imaging physics plus several domain assumptions about electrolyte mixing, density scaling, and gap homogeneity. No new entities are postulated. The free parameters are limited to the assumed electrolyte temperatures that feed the Bruggeman voltage estimate. The gap homogeneity assumption is the most structurally fragile for the paper's headline claim about gap void fraction.

free parameters (1)
  • Assumed electrolyte temperature for conductivity = 26, 31, 29, 34, 32 °C for j = 0.01, 0.16, 0.27, 0.48, 0.54 A/cm2
    The temperature was not measured during X-ray scans to avoid displacement; these values were borrowed from a separate occasion and used in the Bruggeman model to estimate the bubble contribution to cell voltage. A temperature error directly shifts the estimated voltage drop.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Beer-Lambert law applies across the X-ray path through the electrolyzer
    Used implicitly in Eq. 1 to convert attenuation differences into liquid volume fraction, assuming linearity of attenuation with material thickness.
  • domain assumption Bruggeman effective conductivity model with exponent 3/2
    Applied in Section 3.3 and Appendix B to estimate the gas-induced voltage drop from measured void fraction; a standard correlation for spherical bubbles, but not validated for the specific gap geometry.
  • domain assumption Perfect mixing of electrolyte in each chamber, with a single time-dependent density scaling factor k(t)
    Stated in Appendix A.2; needed to correct void fraction for density changes as water is consumed. Spatial variations in concentration are ignored.
  • ad hoc to paper Mixing between fresh and old electrolyte occurs only after electrolysis starts
    Assumed in Appendix A.3 to set the initial scaling factor; the authors note that the alternative assumption gives only a few percent difference in attenuation.
  • ad hoc to paper Vertical maximum of the 'full' scan attenuation per column estimates the bubble-free electrolyte attenuation
    Introduced in Appendix A.4 to handle residual bubbles in the full reference scans; relies on negligible vertical density variation in the electrolyte.
  • ad hoc to paper Void fraction is homogeneous across the width of the gap
    Stated in Appendix A.1: only the center line of the gap is measured because the gap is 7-20 pixels wide and artefacts are present near electrodes; this supports the reported gap void fraction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of X-ray measurements of gas distribution in a zero gap alkaline water electrolyzer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TS3VQLEP

@misc{pith2026241108940,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: X-ray measurements of gas distribution in a zero gap alkaline water electrolyzer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TS3VQLEP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08940}
}
abstract

X-ray radioscopy was used to measure the 2D projected dynamic void fraction in a zero/narrow gap alkaline water electrolyzer at a spatial resolution of 15 $\mu$m, for narrow gap sizes up to 300 $\mu$m and current densities up to 0.54 A/cm$^2$. As expected, the void fraction in the bulk was found to increase along the cell height and with increasing current density. The void fraction measured in the gap region (the space between the diaphragm and the electrode and its holes) was always larger than in the bulk. It hardly depended on the gap size at current densities below 0.3 A/cm$^2$. The lowest cell potential was measured for zero gap. No evidence of isolating gas pockets/films in the gaps was found. Liquid crossover and oxygen void fraction exceeding the hydrogen void fraction occurred for porous plate electrodes, but these phenomena were suppressed for perforated foil electrodes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08940 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Horizontal cross-section, (b) vertical cross-section and (c) front view of the in-house built electrolyzer including the compositions and the corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Experimental procedure of a series of electrolysis experiments with the scans and actions performed. Below each step, the corresponding attenuation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Snapshot of the attenuation − ln(I/I0) from radiography for the current density j = 0.16 A cm−2 , gap size ld = 200 µm, KOH concentration 24 wt%, centering at height H = 60 mm, and focusing at the H2 gap (i.e. a side view). (b) The corresponding instantaneous void fraction α (Eq. 1) for the at￾tenuation image without applying a mask. (c) The corresponding instantaneous void fraction α for the attenuation image a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An illustration of the spatially averaged void fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mean void fractions at H2 gap (⟨αH2,gap⟩), O2 gap (⟨αO2,gap⟩), H2 bulk region (⟨αH2,bulk⟩) and O2 bulk region (⟨αO2,bulk⟩) vs. current density at different heights of the cell with a gap size lgap = 200 µm. Multiple realisa￾tions for the same gap and same current densi…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Estimated cell potential drop due to presence of gas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Dimensions and illustration for porous nickel plate and foil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Change of liquid level at O2 side ∆hO2 minus change of liquid level at H2 side ∆hH2 after an electrolysis experiment, normalized by the average initial liquid level before any electrolysis experiment h0 and the duration of the electrolysis experiment τ. These three se…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    rep., IEA, Paris (2019)

    IEA, The future of hydrogen, Tech. rep., IEA, Paris (2019). URL https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-hydrogen

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Phillips, C

    R. Phillips, C. W. Dunnill, Zero gap alkaline electrolysis cell design for renewable energy storage as hydrogen gas, RSC Advances 6 (2016) 100643–100651. doi:10.1039/c6ra22242k

    work page doi:10.1039/c6ra22242k 2016

  3. [3]

    M. T. de Groot, A. W. Vreman, Ohmic resistance in zero gap alkaline electrolysis with a zirfon diaphragm, Electrochimica Acta 369 (2 2021). doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137684

    work page arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Hreiz, L

    R. Hreiz, L. Abdelouahed, D. F ¨unfschilling, F. Lapicque, Electrogener- ated bubbles induced convection in narrow vertical cells: A review, chem- ical engineering research and design 100 (2015) 268–281

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Tjaden, S

    B. Tjaden, S. J. Cooper, D. J. L. Brett, D. Kramer, P. R. Shearing, On the origin and application of the bruggeman correlation for analysing trans- port phenomena in electrochemical systems, Current Opinion in Chemi- cal Engineering 12 (2016) 44–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.coche.2016.02.006

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Zarghami, N

    A. Zarghami, N. Deen, A. Vreman, Cfd modeling of multiphase flow in an alkaline water electrolyzer, Chemical engineering science 227 (2020) 115926

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    V ogt, On the gas-evolution efficiency of electrodes i–theoretical, Elec- trochimica Acta 56 (3) (2011) 1409–1416

    H. V ogt, On the gas-evolution efficiency of electrodes i–theoretical, Elec- trochimica Acta 56 (3) (2011) 1409–1416

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    V ogt, On the gas-evolution efficiency of electrodes

    H. V ogt, On the gas-evolution efficiency of electrodes. ii–numerical anal- ysis, Electrochimica Acta 56 (5) (2011) 2404–2410

    work page 2011

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    C. W. Tobias, E ffect of gas evolution on current distribution and ohmic resistance in electrolyzers, Journal of the Electrochemical society 106 (9) (1959) 833

    1959

  2. [10]

    Kienzlen, D

    V . Kienzlen, D. Haaf, W. Schnurnberger, Location of hydrogen gas evolu- tion on perforated plate electrodes in zero gap cells, International journal of hydrogen energy 19 (9) (1994) 729–732

    1994

  3. [11]

    Nagai, M

    N. Nagai, M. Takeuchi, T. Kimura, T. Oka, Existence of optimum space between electrodes on hydrogen production by water electrolysis, Inter- national journal of hydrogen energy 28 (1) (2003) 35–41

    2003

  4. [12]

    M. J. Lavorante, C. Y . Reynoso, J. I. Franco, Water electrolysis with zir- fon® as separator and naoh as electrolyte, Desalination and Water Treat- ment 56 (13) (2015) 3647–3653

    2015

  5. [13]

    Haverkort, H

    J. Haverkort, H. Rajaei, V oltage losses in zero-gap alkaline water elec- trolysis, Journal of Power Sources 497 (2021) 229864. doi:10.1016/ j.jpowsour.2021.229864

    2021

  6. [14]

    Abdelouahed, R

    L. Abdelouahed, R. Hreiz, S. Poncin, G. Valentin, F. Lapicque, Hydro- dynamics of gas bubbles in the gap of lantern blade electrodes without forced flow of electrolyte: Experiments and cfd modelling, Chemical En- gineering Science 111 (2014) 255–265. doi:https://doi.org/10. 10...

    2014

  7. [15]

    H. Rox, A. Bashkavtov, X. Yang., S. Loos, G. Mutschke, G. Gerbeth, K. Eckert, Bubble size distribution and electrode coverage at porous nickel electrodes in a novel 3-electrode flow-through cell, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 48 (2023) 2892–2905. doi:https://doi. or...

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    Riegel, J

    H. Riegel, J. Mitrovic, K. Stephan, Role of mass transfer on hydro- gen evolution in aqueous media, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 28 (1998) 10–17. doi:10.1023/A:1003285415420

    1998 doi

  9. [17]

    S. Yuan, C. Zhao, X. Cai, L. An, S. Shen, X. Yan, J. Zhang, Bubble evolution and transport in pem water electrolysis: Mechanism, impact, and management, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 96 (2023) 101075. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101075

    2023

  10. [18]

    D. H. Jeon, S. Kim, M. Kim, C. Lee, H.-S. Cho, Oxygen bubble trans- port in a porous transport layer of polymer electrolyte water electrolyzer, Journal of Power Sources 553 (2023) 232322. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232322

    2023

  11. [19]

    M. M. Mandalahalli, E. C. Wagner, L. M. Portela, R. F. Mudde, Elec- trolyte effects on recirculating dense bubbly flow: An experimental study using x-ray imaging, AIChE Journal 66 (2020) e16696. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1002/aic.16696

    2020 doi

  12. [21]

    S. Hu, B. Guo, S. Ding, F. Yang, J. Dang, B. Liu, J. Gu, J. Ma, M. Ouyang, A comprehensive review of alkaline water electrolysis mathematical mod- eling, Applied Energy 327 (12 2022). doi:10.1016/j.apenergy. 2022.120099

    2022

  13. [23]

    J. W. Haverkort, Modeling and experiments of binary electrolytes in the presence of di ffusion, migration, and electro-osmotic flow, Physical Review Applied 14 (10 2020). doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14. 044047

    2020 doi

  14. [24]

    J. W. Haverkort, H. Rajaei, Electro-osmotic flow and the limiting cur- rent in alkaline water electrolysis, Journal of Power Sources Advances 6 (2020) 100034. doi:10.1016/j.powera.2020.100034

    2020

  15. [25]

    Agfa-Gevaert, Technical data sheet: Zirfon perl utp 500 (2020)

    N. Agfa-Gevaert, Technical data sheet: Zirfon perl utp 500 (2020)

    2020

  16. [26]

    Porombka, S

    P. Porombka, S. Boden, D. Lucas, U. Hampel, Horizontal annular flow through orifice studied by x-ray microtomography, Experiments in Fluids 62 (1 2021). doi:10.1007/s00348-020-03091-6

    2021 doi

  17. [27]

    Y . Ma, X. Cao, X. Feng, Y . Ma, H. Zou, Fabrication of super-hydrophobic film from pmma with intrinsic water contact angle below 90°, Poly- mer 48 (26) (2007) 7455–7460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. polymer.2007.10.038

    2007 doi

  18. [28]

    Horsthemke, J

    A. Horsthemke, J. J. Schr ¨oder, The wettability of industrial surfaces: Con- tact angle measurements and thermodynamic analysis, Chemical Engi- neering and Processing: Process Intensification 19 (5) (1985) 277–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0255-2701(85)80020-9

    1985 doi

  19. [29]

    Gennes, F

    P.-G. Gennes, F. Brochard-Wyart, D. Qu´er´e, et al., Capillarity and wetting phenomena: drops, bubbles, pearls, waves, Springer, 2004. 12

    2004

  20. [30]

    Hammersberg, M

    P. Hammersberg, M. Stenstr ¨om, H. Hedtj¨arn, M. Mångård, Measurements of absolute energy spectra for an industrial micro focal x-ray source under working conditions using a compton scattering spectrometer, Journal of X-ray science and Technology 8 (1) (1998) 5–18

    1998

  21. [31]

    Berger, J

    M. Berger, J. Hubbell, C. J. C. J. Seltzer, S.M., R. Sukumar, D. Zucker, K. Olsen, Xcom: photon cross sections database [online]], http:// physics.nist.gov/xcom. [Accessed: 2023-09] National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (2010). doi:10.18434/ T48G6X

    2010

  22. [32]

    T. F. O’Brien, T. V . Bommaraju, F. Hine, Handbook of Chlor-Alkali Tech- nology, Springer, 2005. 13

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.