REVIEW 1 cited by
Secure Internet Exams Despite Coercion
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study coercion-resistance for online exams. We propose two properties, Anonymous Submission and Single-Blindness which, if hold, preserve the anonymity of the links between tests, test takers, and examiners even when the parties coerce one another into revealing secrets. The properties are relevant: not even Remark!, a secure exam protocol that satisfied anonymous marking and anonymous examiners results to be coercion resistant. Then, we propose a coercion-resistance protocol which satisfies, in addition to known anonymity properties, the two novel properties we have introduced. We prove our claims formally in ProVerif. The paper has also another contribution: it describes an attack (and a fix) to an exponentiation mixnet that Remark! uses to ensure unlinkability. We use the secure version of the mixnet in our new protocol.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Risks & Benefits of LLMs & GenAI for Platform Integrity, Healthcare Diagnostics, Financial Trust and Compliance, Cybersecurity, Privacy & AI Safety: A Comprehensive Survey, Roadmap & Implementation Blueprint
A synthesis of industry-reported LLM risks and defensive deployments, capped with a conceptual 'LLM Design & Assurance' stack for trust and compliance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.