Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Enhancing Robustness in Large Language Models: Prompting for Mitigating the Impact of Irrelevant Information

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.10615 v2 pith:TTP7744H submitted 2024-08-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords informationirrelevantllmspromptingdatasetmethodreasoningtechniques
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, Large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant attention due to their superior performance in complex reasoning tasks. However, recent studies may diminish their reasoning capabilities markedly when problem descriptions contain irrelevant information, even with the use of advanced prompting techniques. To further investigate this issue, a dataset of primary school mathematics problems containing irrelevant information, named GSMIR, was constructed. Testing prominent LLMs and prompting techniques on this dataset revealed that while LLMs can identify irrelevant information, they do not effectively mitigate the interference it causes once identified. A novel automatic construction method, ATF, which enhances the ability of LLMs to identify and self-mitigate the influence of irrelevant information, is proposed to address this shortcoming. This method operates in two steps: first, analysis of irrelevant information, followed by its filtering. The ATF method, as demonstrated by experimental results, significantly improves the reasoning performance of LLMs and prompting techniques, even in the presence of irrelevant information on the GSMIR dataset.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robust Reasoning Benchmark

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    The Robust Reasoning Benchmark shows frontier LLMs are mostly resilient to textual perturbations on AIME problems while open-weight models suffer up to 54% accuracy drops and exhibit accuracy decay on later problems d...

  2. Does Prompt Design Impact Quality of Data Imputation by LLMs?

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Group-wise CSV prompts with correlation-based column pruning reduce LLM imputation prompt size while roughly maintaining or slightly improving classifier-based imputation quality on two imbalanced datasets.

Pith tools