REVIEW 1 cited by
Reward Tweaking: Maximizing the Total Reward While Planning for Short Horizons
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In reinforcement learning, the discount factor $\gamma$ controls the agent's effective planning horizon. Traditionally, this parameter was considered part of the MDP; however, as deep reinforcement learning algorithms tend to become unstable when the effective planning horizon is long, recent works refer to $\gamma$ as a hyper-parameter -- thus changing the underlying MDP and potentially leading the agent towards sub-optimal behavior on the original task. In this work, we introduce \emph{reward tweaking}. Reward tweaking learns a surrogate reward function $\tilde r$ for the discounted setting that induces optimal behavior on the original finite-horizon total reward task. Theoretically, we show that there exists a surrogate reward that leads to optimality in the original task and discuss the robustness of our approach. Additionally, we perform experiments in high-dimensional continuous control tasks and show that reward tweaking guides the agent towards better long-horizon returns although it plans for short horizons.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Average-Reward Soft Actor-Critic
ASAC extends soft actor-critic to the entropy-regularized average-reward setting with a policy improvement theorem, but its claimed novelty is undermined by the earlier RVI-SAC algorithm.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.