Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 47 references

Decomposition of low-angle grain boundaries

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A grain boundary can split into two boundaries with a new grain between them when stress drives one dislocation type away from another.

desk verdict Core result is a real MD demonstration, but the mixed-GB temperature/strain-rate story is self-contradictory and needs rewriting. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02789 v1 pith:TTWZWICY submitted 2025-09-02 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Wei Wan , Changxin Tang , Eric R Homer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords grainboundarydecompositionPeach-Koehlerforcelow-angledislocationseparationmoleculardynamicssimulationmixedtilt-twistFCCnickelreversibility
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that grain boundaries are not only capable of merging; under the right stress, a single low-angle boundary can decompose into two independent boundaries separated by a newly formed grain. The effect is traced to the Peach-Koehler force, which lets a chosen stress state push one dislocation type while leaving another localized. The authors demonstrate this by atomistic simulation in two nickel bicrystals, an asymmetric tilt boundary and a mixed tilt-twist boundary. They identify three requirements: two different Burgers vectors, differential Peach-Koehler forces, and dislocation separability. The result matters because it suggests a mechanical handle on dislocation patterns, with possible uses in film patterning and defect management.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Peach-Koehler force F = (sigma dot b) cross l acting on a dislocation with Burgers vector b and line direction l. By designing a stress state sigma such that this force is nonzero for one dislocation type and zero for another, the authors make only one array glide. The paper's three stated conditions for decomposition at least two Burgers vectors, differential forces, and dislocation separability determine when this selective glide results in boundary splitting. In the mixed boundary, separability is governed by reactions at tilt-twist intersection nodes, where the two dislocation types form loops and can become sessile; this node behavior is what makes the process

What would settle it

In-situ transmission electron microscopy of a nickel bicrystal with an 8.8 degree asymmetric tilt boundary loaded in the direction that should move only one edge dislocation array: if the two arrays do not separate into two boundaries with a new grain between them, or if the supposedly stationary array also glides, the decomposition claim is falsified for that regime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that low-angle grain boundaries can decompose when their dislocation content responds non-uniformly to an applied stress. In a simulated [001] asymmetric tilt boundary, a 1/2[110] edge array glides away from a stationary [010] edge array, leaving two tilt boundaries with a new grain between them. In a mixed tilt-twist boundary, a [001] edge array stays pinned while a 1/2[110] screw network bows, then breaks away after overcoming a stress barrier, yielding separate tilt and twist boundaries. The paper gives three conditions for decomposition: the boundary has at least two different Burgers vectors, the stress state produces sufficiently different Peach-Koehler forces, and

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the imposed constant-strain loading really does keep one dislocation type immobile while the other glides; if local stress, lattice rotation, or the interatomic potential lets the supposedly stationary dislocations move or pins the mobile ones differently, selective separation will not occur.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the three criteria hold, any low-angle grain boundary with at least two separable dislocation types should be inducible to decompose, not just the two simulated cases.
  • For asymmetric tilt boundaries, decomposition occurs at every temperature and strain rate tested, with the critical stress rising with strain rate and falling with temperature, consistent with a thermally activated process.
  • For mixed tilt-twist boundaries, decomposition occurs only at low temperatures and high strain rates; otherwise the screw network bows out but remains pinned by edge dislocations, producing partially mobile boundaries.
  • The extra stress needed to separate the twist component from a mixed boundary is about 134 +/- 10 MPa in this model and is nearly independent of strain rate.
  • Decomposition offers a mechanical route to control dislocation arrays in thin films and could be used to sweep dislocation arrays through grains to gather defects or impurities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the three criteria are stated in terms of local stress and dislocation character, the same decomposition should be realizable in other easy-glide metals and alloys, not only nickel; the paper's material choice is presented as a modeling convenience.
  • Editorial inference: the stress barrier seen in the mixed boundary suggests that engineering the intersection nodes through alloying, precipitate pinning, or temperature could tune whether a boundary decomposes or merely bows, making the effect a controllable processing variable.
  • Editorial inference: a direct extension would be unloading-reloading cycles on the asymmetric tilt case to test whether the two boundaries re-merge reversibly, which would turn decomposition into a mechanically driven switch for dislocation arrangements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports atomistic simulations demonstrating that a low-angle grain boundary can decompose into two separate grain boundaries when the applied stress state exerts sufficiently different Peach-Koehler forces on the different dislocation types composing the boundary. Two cases are studied in Ni with an EAM potential: a [001] low-angle asymmetric tilt GB (two edge dislocation types) and a (001) low-angle mixed tilt-twist GB (an edge dislocation array plus a screw dislocation network). In both cases, the mobile dislocation component separates from the stationary one, leaving a new grain between two GBs. The paper also examines strain-rate and temperature effects, identifies double-loop versus single-loop node reaction products at intersections in the mixed GB, and reports an apparent stress barrier for separating the twist component. Three conditions for GB decomposition are proposed.

Significance. If correct, the claimed phenomenon is a genuinely new elementary process in grain-boundary microstructure evolution: a single boundary splitting into two boundaries with a new grain between them, i.e., the inverse of GB coalescence. The central evidence is direct MD visualization, and the Peach-Koehler model is used as a prior design principle rather than fitted to the simulations, which is a strength. The three-condition framework is concrete and falsifiable, and the stress-barrier quantification is a useful target for future work. However, the parameter-space interpretation is currently compromised by a direct internal contradiction in the temperature/strain-rate narrative and by the definition of 'critical RSS'; these issues must be resolved before the conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Strain rate and temperature effects] This section contains a direct contradiction. It first states 'For the low-angle mixed GB, decomposition is only observed at low temperatures and high strain rates,' and two paragraphs later states 'At 300 K, decomposition is observed at low strain rates but not at high strain rates.' The proposed mechanism then argues that at 300 K the slower strain rate provides more time for the double-loop node to evolve into the single-loop node, which is described as 'unable to break away.' That mechanism predicts suppression, not decomposition, at low strain rates. Because this passage underpins the separability discussion and conclusion (2), and is used to interpret Figure 4b and Supplementary Figures S2–S4, the reported parameter-space behavior is indeterminate as written. The text and the data/figure must be reconciled; if the intended statement is 'decomposition at low temperatures and high st
  2. [Strain rate and temperature effects / Figure 4b-d] For the mixed GB, the authors define the critical RSS as 'the highest RSS achieved during each simulation,' considered as the critical RSS to activate decomposition or partial mobility. This conflates a peak stress with a threshold. For decomposition, the meaningful quantity is the RSS at the moment the screw network breaks away, which may be lower than the later peak if stress continues to increase; for non-decomposing cases, there is no single critical event and the highest RSS is just an endpoint value. This affects the interpretation of Figure 4b and the quantitative barrier of 134 ± 10 MPa in Figure 4d. Please report the RSS at the onset of separation (or justify that the maximum coincides with it) and specify a criterion for partial mobility.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Methodology, Eq. (2)] The displayed formula for RSS is garbled in the provided text. Please define all symbols (unit Burgers vector, slip-plane normal, summation convention) and correct the typography so that Eq. (2) is unambiguous.
  2. [Conclusions] The phrase 'At higher temperatures and lower simulation times (slower strain rates)' is internally inconsistent: lower simulation times correspond to higher strain rates, not slower ones. This typo should be corrected to avoid compounding the confusion in the Results section.
  3. [Figure 2 caption] The text refers to 'the stress-strain curve in Figure 2b,' but the caption lists (b) as 'Velocities' and (c) as 'RSS-strain/time curve.' Please align the references with the caption.
  4. [Figure 3 caption] The caption states 'at 100 K and 107 strain rate'; the exponent appears to be missing and should read 10^7 s^-1.
  5. [Asymmetric tilt GB / reversibility] The reversibility of the asymmetric-tilt decomposition is asserted from the smooth stress-strain curve, but no unloading or reverse-loading simulation is shown. Either add such a test or soften the reversibility claim.
  6. [Generality] The three proposed conditions are supported by only two low-angle GBs in one EAM Ni potential. A sentence noting that node reactions and core energetics may differ for other potentials or materials would help calibrate the scope of the claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: low-angle decomposition is independently demonstrated in MD; only minor non-load-bearing self-citations are present.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is not circular. The Peach-Koehler force (Eq. 1) is used as an external physical input to select a stress state (Methods: 'the Peach-Koehler model is used to determine the desired stress states to induce decomposition'), but the subsequent decomposition is an emergent outcome of MD simulation, not an input to the model. No model parameter is fitted to the simulation output: the critical RSS values in Figure 4 are measured from the simulations, and the stress barrier (134±10 MPa) is a post-hoc difference of measured values, not a fitted prediction. The asymmetric-tilt demonstration is self-contained: the two dislocation types are constructed, the stress is selected from P-K, and the MD shows one array gliding while the other remains stationary (Figs. 2a1-2a3). The mixed-GB case is even less trivial because the screw network is initially pinned at nodes and separates only after a stress barrier (Fig. 3), so the input stress does not by construction force separation. There are self-citations (Refs. [24,25] for mixed-GB construction; Ref. [43] for high-angle decomposition), but none is load-bearing for the low-angle claim; [43] appears only in the concluding suggestion that high-angle GBs can decompose. Separately, the Results text contains an internal inconsistency about strain-rate/temperature dependence: 'decomposition is only observed at low temperatures and high strain rates' is followed two sentences later by 'At 300 K, decomposition is observed at low strain rates but not at high strain rates,' and the node-evolution mechanism is explicitly 'hypothesized.' These are correctness/consistency concerns, not circularity, and do not change the low-angle decomposition demonstration.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central demonstration rests on standard dislocation theory (Peach-Koehler), an empirical EAM potential, and DXA-based structural identification. No fitted parameters are introduced; the stress states are chosen from the P-K model and the critical RSS values are measured quantities. Generality claims depend on transferability assumptions rather than a fitted model.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Peach-Koehler force equation (eq 1) and Schmid's law (eq 2) correctly describe the forces on the dislocations in the grain boundary under the applied stress.
    Invoked in Introduction and Methodology; established dislocation theory is treated as input, not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The Foiles-Hoyt EAM potential accurately represents nickel grain-boundary structures, dislocation mobilities, and their temperature and strain-rate dependence.
    Methodology states the potential 'is widely used in the simulation of nickel GB migration'. If the potential misrepresents relative mobilities, the simulated decomposition could be an artifact.
  • domain assumption Dislocation structures identified by DXA on zero-temperature relaxed GBs are the operative defects during the deformation simulations, and no other defect mechanisms dominate.
    DXA output is used to select stress states and to classify node structures (double loop vs single loop) in Results; if the identification is wrong, the predicted stress states could be misdirected.
  • domain assumption Constant-strain boundary conditions produce the intended stress states, and the global stress tensor can be used to compute local resolved shear stresses via eq (2).
    Methodology says constant strain boundary conditions 'lead to the desired stress states'; local stresses near the GB may deviate from the global values.
  • domain assumption Materials with the same lattice type will exhibit the same dislocation-based decomposition behavior as nickel.
    Methodology states 'selection of materials with the same lattice type should not affect the dislocation structures'; this underlies the generality claim to other FCC metals.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Decomposition of low-angle grain boundaries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TTWZWICY

@misc{pith2026250902789,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Decomposition of low-angle grain boundaries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TTWZWICY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02789}
}
read the original abstract

Grain boundaries (GBs) merge and grains disappear during microstructure evolution. However, the Peach-Koehler model predicts that particular stress states may reverse such a process by exerting differential Peach-Koehler forces on different dislocations. This work considers this reversal as GB decomposition and illustrates it in a low-angle asymmetric tilt GB and a low-angle mixed tilt-twist GB via atomistic simulation. In both cases, the dislocations separate into two GBs separated by a new grain. This work describes the requirements for decomposition and the importance of dislocation separability. Additionally, we examine the dislocation behaviors and stress signatures associated with this process, along with the impact of strain rate and temperature on those aspects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02789 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Model showing a [001] low asymmetric tilt GB separates into two asymmetric tilt GBs due to the different Peach￾Koehler forces on dislocations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Decomposition of an asymmetric tilt GB deformed at 5×107 s-1 and 100 K. (a1) Initial GB structure at 0 ps; (a2) GB structure at 700 ps; (a3) GB structure at 950 ps; Conjugate gradient energy minimization is used to remove the thermal noises in (a1), (a2) and (a3); (b) Velocities of the two dislocation types in the low-angle asymmetric tilt GB; (c) RSS￾strain/time curve of the two dislocation types. It is also noted … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Decomposition process of the mixed GB as contrasted with the migrations of its two independent GB components, at 100 K and 107 strain rate: (a) Violin plot showing the GB atom distribution (non-FCC atoms identified by adaptive common neighbor analysis [31]) as a function of both time and position along the boundary plane normal; (a1) Initial mixed GB structure at 0 ps; (a2) Mixed GB structures with the bowing screw … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Grain boundary engineering: an overview after 25 years

    Randle, V . Grain boundary engineering: an overview after 25 years. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2010, 26(3), 253–261

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Strengthening materials by engineering coherent internal boundaries at the nanoscale

    Lu, K.; Lu, L.; Suresh, S. Strengthening materials by engineering coherent internal boundaries at the nanoscale. Science 2009, 324, 349–352

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Revealing extraordinary intrinsic tensile plasticity in gradient nano-grained copper

    Fang, T.H.; Li, W.L.; Tao, N.R.; Lu, K. Revealing extraordinary intrinsic tensile plasticity in gradient nano-grained copper. Science 2011, 331, 1587–1590

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Optimization of grain boundary character distribution for intergranular corrosion resistant 304 stainless steel by twin-induced grain boundary engineering

    Shimada, M.; Kokawa, H.; Wang, Z.J.; Sato, Y .S.; Karibe, I. Optimization of grain boundary character distribution for intergranular corrosion resistant 304 stainless steel by twin-induced grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 2002, 50(9), 2331–2341

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Cryogenic indentation-induced grain growth in nanotwinned copper

    Brons, J.G.; Padilla, H.A.; Thompson, G.B.; Boyce, B.L. Cryogenic indentation-induced grain growth in nanotwinned copper. Scr. Mater. 2013, 68(10) 781–784

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    How grain growth stops: A mechanism for grain-growth stagnation in pure materials

    Holm, E.A.; Foiles, S.M. How grain growth stops: A mechanism for grain-growth stagnation in pure materials. Science 2010, 328(5982), 1138–1141

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Stress induced grain boundary motion

    Winning, M.; Gottstein, G.; Shvindlerman, L. Stress induced grain boundary motion. Acta Mater. 2001, 49(2), 211–219

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    On the mechanisms of grain boundary migration

    Winning, M.; Gottstein, G.; Shvindlerman, L. On the mechanisms of grain boundary migration. Acta Mater. 2002, 50(2), 353–363

    work page 2002

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Coupling grain boundary motion to shear deformation

    Cahn, J.W.; Mishin, Y .; Suzuki, A. Coupling grain boundary motion to shear deformation. Acta Mater. 2006, 54(19), 4953–4975

    2006

  2. [10]

    Phenomenology of shear-coupled grain boundary motion in symmetric tilt and general grain boundaries

    Homer, E.R.; Foiles, S.M.; Holm, E.A.; Olmsted, D.L. Phenomenology of shear-coupled grain boundary motion in symmetric tilt and general grain boundaries. Acta Mater. 2013, 61(4), 1048–1060

    2013

  3. [11]

    Reconciling grain growth and shear-coupled grain boundary migration

    Thomas, S.L.; Chen, K.T.; Han, J.; Purohit, P.K.; Srolovitz, D.J. Reconciling grain growth and shear-coupled grain boundary migration. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8(1),

    2017

  4. [12]

    Grain boundary shear coupling is not a grain boundary property

    Chen, K.T.; Han, J.; Thomas, S.L.; Srolovitz, D.J. Grain boundary shear coupling is not a grain boundary property. Acta Mater. 2019, 167, 241–247

    2019

  5. [13]

    Sliding mechanisms in aluminum grain boundaries

    Molteni, C.; Marzari, N.; Payne, M.; Heine, V. Sliding mechanisms in aluminum grain boundaries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 79(5),

    1997

  6. [14]

    First principles simulation of grain boundary sliding

    Molteni, C.; Francis, G.; Payne, M.; Heine, V . First principles simulation of grain boundary sliding. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 76(8),

    1996

  7. [15]

    Sliding behavior of coincidence grain boundaries deviating from ideal symmetric tilt relationship

    Fukutomi, H.; Iseki, T.; Endo, T.; Kamijo, T. Sliding behavior of coincidence grain boundaries deviating from ideal symmetric tilt relationship. Acta Metall. Mater. 1991, 39(7), 1445–1448

    1991

  8. [16]

    Phase field crystal simulation of grain boundary motion, grain rotation and dislocation reactions in a BCC bicrystal

    Yamanaka, A.; McReynolds, K.; Voorhees, P.W. Phase field crystal simulation of grain boundary motion, grain rotation and dislocation reactions in a BCC bicrystal. Acta Mater. 2017, 133, 160–171

    2017

  9. [17]

    Grain boundary migration and grain rotation studied by molecular dynamics, Acta Mater

    Trautt, Z.T.; Mishin, Y. Grain boundary migration and grain rotation studied by molecular dynamics, Acta Mater. 2012, 60(5), 2407–2424

    2012

  10. [18]

    Grain rotation mechanisms in nanocrystalline materials: Multiscale observations in Pt thin films

    Tian, Y.; Gong, X.G.; Xu, M.J.; Qiu, C.H.; Han, Y.; Bi, Y.T.; Estrada, L.V.; Boltynjuk, E.; Hahn, H.; Han, J.; Srolovitz, D.J.; Pan, X.Q. Grain rotation mechanisms in nanocrystalline materials: Multiscale observations in Pt thin films. Science 2024, 386(6717), 49–54

    2024

  11. [19]

    The forces exerted on dislocations and the stress fields produced by them

    Peach, M.; Koehler, J.S. The forces exerted on dislocations and the stress fields produced by them. Phys. Rev. 1950, 80(3), 436–439

    1950

  12. [21]

    M.; Cohen, D

    Medlin, D.L.; Foiles, S. M.; Cohen, D. A dislocation-based description of grain boundary dissociation: application to a 90° <110> tilt boundary in gold. Acta Mater. 2001, 49, 3689–3697

    2001

  13. [22]

    Dissociation of tilt dislocation walls in Au

    Geng, Y .J.; Wang, C.Y .; Yan, J.X.; Zhang, Z.J.; Yang, H.J.; Yang, J.B.; Du, K.; Zhang, Z.F. Dissociation of tilt dislocation walls in Au. Acta Metall. Sin. 2022, 35, 1787–1792

    2022

  14. [23]

    macroscopic

    Morawiec, A.; Glowinski, K. On “macroscopic” characterization of mixed grain boundaries. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 5756–5767

    2013

  15. [24]

    Structures and energies of computed silicon (001) small angle mixed grain boundaries as a function of three macroscopic characters

    Wan, W.; Tang, C.X. Structures and energies of computed silicon (001) small angle mixed grain boundaries as a function of three macroscopic characters. Acta Mater. 2023, 261, 119353

    2023

  16. [25]

    Can we predict mixed grain boundaries from their tilt and twist components

    Wan, W.; Tang, C.X.; Homer, E.R. Can we predict mixed grain boundaries from their tilt and twist components. Acta Mater. 2024, 279, 120293

    2024

  17. [26]

    Accurate control of the misorientation angles in direct wafer bonding

    Fournel, F.; Moriceau, H.; Aspar, B. Accurate control of the misorientation angles in direct wafer bonding. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80,

    2002

  18. [27]

    Lateral ordering of quantum dots by periodic subsurface stressors

    Romanov, A.E.; Petroff, P.M.; Speck, J.S. Lateral ordering of quantum dots by periodic subsurface stressors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 74,

    1999

  19. [28]

    How to control the self-organization of nanoparticles by bonded thin layers

    Bourret, A. How to control the self-organization of nanoparticles by bonded thin layers. Surf. Sci. 1999, 432, 37–53

    1999

  20. [29]

    Controlled surface nanopatterning with buried dislocation arrays

    Leroy, F.; Eymery, J.; Gentile, P.; Fournel, F. Controlled surface nanopatterning with buried dislocation arrays. Surf. Sci. 2003, 545, 211–219

    2003

  21. [30]

    Stress-driven migration of simple low-angle mixed grain boundaries

    Lim, A.T.; Haataja, M.; Cai, W.; Srolovitz, D.J. Stress-driven migration of simple low-angle mixed grain boundaries. Acta Mater. 2012, 60, 1395–1407

    2012

  22. [31]

    Structure identification methods for atomistic simulations of crystalline materials

    Stukowski, A. Structure identification methods for atomistic simulations of crystalline materials. Model. Simul. Mater. Sc. 2012, 20, 045021

    2012

  23. [32]

    Nodal effects in dislocation mobility

    Bulatov, V .V .; Cai W. Nodal effects in dislocation mobility. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89,

    2002

  24. [33]

    Enhanced mobility of dislocation network nodes and its effect on dislocation multiplication and strain hardening

    Bertin, N.; Cai, W.; Aubry, S.; Arsenlis, A.; Bulatov, V .V . Enhanced mobility of dislocation network nodes and its effect on dislocation multiplication and strain hardening. Acta Mater. 2024, 271, 119884

    2024

  25. [34]

    Strain rate dependency of dislocation plasticity

    Fan, H.D.; Wang, Q.Y .; El-Awady, J.A.; Raabe, D.; Zaiser, M. Strain rate dependency of dislocation plasticity. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12,

    2021

  26. [35]

    Stukowski, A.; Bulatov, V .V .; Arsenlis, A.; Automated identification and indexing of dislocations in crystal interfaces. Model. Simul. Mater. Sc. 2012, 20, 085007

    2012

  27. [36]

    Temperature dependence of dislocation dissociation mode in L12 trialuminides

    Fukunaga, K.; Kolbe, M.; Yamada, K.; Miura, Y . Temperature dependence of dislocation dissociation mode in L12 trialuminides. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1997, 234, 594–597

    1997

  28. [37]

    Atomistic simulations of dislocation mobility in Al, Ni and Al/Mg alloys

    Olmsted, D.L.; Hector Jr, L.G.; Curtin, W.A.; Clifton, R.J. Atomistic simulations of dislocation mobility in Al, Ni and Al/Mg alloys. Model. Simul. Mater. Sc. 2005, 13, 371–388

    2005

  29. [39]

    The impurity-drag effect in grain boundary motion, Acta Metall

    Cahn, J.W. The impurity-drag effect in grain boundary motion, Acta Metall. 1962, 10(9), 789–798

    1962

  30. [40]

    Stüwe, H.P

    Lücke, K. Stüwe, H.P. On the theory of impurity controlled grain boundary motion. Acta Metall. 1971, 19(10), 1087–1099

    1971

  31. [41]

    The effect of solute atoms on grain boundary migration: a solute pinning approach, Metall

    Hersent, E.; Marthinsen, K.; Nes, E. The effect of solute atoms on grain boundary migration: a solute pinning approach, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2013, 44(7), 3364–3375

    2013

  32. [42]

    Small-angle twist grain boundaries as sinks for point defects

    Jiang, H.; Szlufarska, I. Small-angle twist grain boundaries as sinks for point defects. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8,

    2018

  33. [43]

    Decomposition of general grain boundaries

    Wan, W.; Deng, J.W.; Tang, C.X. Decomposition of general grain boundaries. arXiv preprint 2025 https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00759

    2025 arXiv

  34. [44]

    Bhattacharya, A.; Shen, Y. F. ; Hefferan, C.M.; Li, S.F.; Lind, J.; Suter, R.M.; Krill III, C.E.; Rohrer, G.S. Grain boundary velocity and curvature are not correlated in Ni polycrystals. Science, 2021, 374, 189–193

    2021

  35. [45]

    Computation of grain boundary stiffness and mobility from boundary fluctuations

    Foiles, S.M.; Hoyt, J.J. Computation of grain boundary stiffness and mobility from boundary fluctuations. Acta Mater. 2006, 54(12), 3351-3357

    2006

  36. [46]

    LAMMPS-a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales

    Thompson, A.P.; Aktulga, H.M.; Berger, R.; Bolintineanu, D.S.; Brown, W.N.; Crozier, P.S.; Veld, P.J.I.; Kohlmeyer, A.; Moore, S.G.; Nguyen, T.D.; Shan, R.; Stevens, M.J.; Tranchida, J.; Trott, C.; Plimpton, S.J. LAMMPS-a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials m...

    2021

  37. [47]

    Foiles, S.M., Holm, E.A

    Olmsted, D.L. Foiles, S.M., Holm, E.A. Survey of computed grain boundary properties in face-centered cubic metals: I. Grain boundary energy. Acta Mater. 2009, 57,

    2009

  38. [48]

    Examination of computed aluminium grain boundary structures and energies that span the 5D space of crystallographic character

    Homer, E.R.; Hart, G.L.W.; Owens, C.B.; Hensley, D.M.; Spendlove, J.C.; Serafinb, L.H. Examination of computed aluminium grain boundary structures and energies that span the 5D space of crystallographic character. Acta Mater. 2022, 234, 118006

    2022

  39. [49]

    Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with ovito–the open visualization tool

    Stukowski, A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with ovito–the open visualization tool. Model. Simul. Mater. Sc. 2010, 18, 015012

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.