pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.17997 · v6 · pith:TVOYGDS3new · submitted 2025-03-23 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph· physics.ins-det

EIT Spectroscopy of Rydberg Levels Dressed by Linearly Polarized RF fields: Complementary Angular Response for Two Types of Transition Ladders

Matthew Cloutman , Matthew Chilcott , Alexander Elliott , J. Susanne Otto , Amita B. Deb , Niels Kj{\ae}rgaard This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 22:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.ins-det
keywords Rydberg atomsEIT spectroscopyRF electrometryangular momentum laddersdressed statesquantum metrologypolarimetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two types of Rydberg angular momentum ladders produce opposite EIT spectral fingerprints when a linearly polarized RF field is rotated.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that certain combinations of atomic states create universal patterns in transmitted optical light as the polarization direction of an applied RF field is turned. A dressed-state analysis separates the atomic transitions into two ladder categories that respond in complementary ways, with one category producing a central peak in the EIT spectrum and the other producing none. These differences arise directly from the quantization of angular momentum under the RF dressing. The distinction matters for using Rydberg atoms to sense RF electric fields because it affects how the optical readout encodes field strength and direction. The results indicate that some existing ways of reading out Rydberg electrometers may rest on incomplete assumptions about which ladder type is active.

Core claim

Specific combinations of atomic terms give rise to universal, distinctive fingerprints in the detected optical fields upon rotating a linearly polarized RF field. Employing a dressed state picture, two types of atomic angular momentum ladders display strikingly disparate spectroscopic characteristics, including the distinctive absence or presence of a central spectral EIT peak.

What carries the argument

Dressed-state picture that isolates two distinct types of atomic angular momentum ladders for Rydberg levels under linearly polarized RF dressing.

If this is right

  • Specific atomic term combinations produce universal fingerprints in optical transmission when the RF polarization is rotated.
  • One ladder type lacks a central EIT peak while the complementary type displays it.
  • The findings supply concrete guidance for using Rydberg gases in electric-field characterization that includes polarimetry.
  • Prevailing interpretations of SI-traceable Rydberg atom electrometers require re-examination.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Choosing the ladder type in advance could allow optical readout to separate field amplitude from polarization direction more cleanly.
  • The complementary angular responses may provide an in-situ way to verify which atomic states dominate in a given sensing geometry.
  • If the ladder distinction holds, existing calibration protocols for Rydberg electrometers may need adjustment when the RF field is linearly polarized.

Load-bearing premise

The dressed-state picture isolates angular-momentum quantization effects without significant contributions from other decoherence or multi-photon processes.

What would settle it

Record the EIT transmission spectrum while rotating the linear RF polarization for a chosen atomic transition ladder and check whether a central peak appears or stays absent exactly as predicted for that ladder type.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.17997 by Alexander Elliott, Amita B. Deb, J. Susanne Otto, Matthew Chilcott, Matthew Cloutman, Niels Kj{\ae}rgaard.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Level diagram of a four-level model atom with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Hyperfine level diagrams for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Hyperfine level diagrams for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. RF-dressed Rydberg levels—procedure for finding the energy structure probed by EIT. (a) A linearly-polarized RF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Diagram for evaluating the optical coupling from a state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Schematic of experimental setup. Probe and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Spectrograms from EIT-probing the RF-dressed 34 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Simulated spectrograms (bottom row) for type-I (left column) and type-II ladders (right column). The corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Electrometry using a type-I system with co-polarized fields. (a) Experimentally observed AT splitting of the 34 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Level diagrams for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Rydberg atoms efficiently link photons between the radio-frequency (RF) and optical domains. They furnish a medium in which the presence of an RF-field imprints on the transmission of a probe laser beam by altering the coherent coupling between atomic quantum states. The immutable atomic energy structure underpins quantum-metrological RF-field measurements and has driven intensive efforts to realize inherently self-calibrated sensing devices. Here we investigate spectroscopic signatures owing to the quantization of atomic angular momentum. Using an electromagnetically-induced transparency (EIT) sensing scheme, specific combinations of atomic terms are shown to give rise to universal, distinctive fingerprints in the detected optical fields upon rotating a linearly polarized RF field. Employing a dressed state picture, we identify two types of atomic angular momentum ladders that display strikingly disparate spectroscopic characteristics, including the distinctive absence or presence of a central spectral EIT peak. Our study adds important insights into the prospects of Rydberg atomic gases for quantum metrological electric field characterization including polarimetry. In particular, it calls into question prevailing interpretations of SI-traceable Rydberg atom electrometers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an EIT-based spectroscopic study of Rydberg atoms dressed by linearly polarized RF fields. It claims that specific combinations of atomic terms produce universal fingerprints in the detected optical transmission when the RF polarization is rotated, and that a dressed-state analysis identifies two distinct types of angular-momentum ladders exhibiting complementary responses, notably the presence versus absence of a central EIT peak. The work discusses implications for quantum-metrological RF sensing and questions existing interpretations of SI-traceable Rydberg electrometers.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the identification of ladder-type-dependent universal fingerprints would constitute a useful addition to the understanding of angular-momentum effects in Rydberg EIT systems and could inform polarimetry applications. The manuscript does not report machine-checked proofs, fully parameter-free derivations, or large-scale reproducible datasets, so its primary value would lie in the experimental observation and the dressed-state interpretation rather than in those stronger categories.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / theory section] Abstract and theory section: the central claim that the dressed-state picture cleanly isolates angular-momentum quantization effects (producing the reported presence/absence of the central EIT peak) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative bounds showing that RF Rabi frequencies remain well below decay rates, detunings, or multi-photon thresholds. If those conditions are violated, the predicted fingerprints can be washed out, undermining the assertion that the signatures are reliable indicators of ladder type alone.
  2. [Experimental results section] Experimental results section: the manuscript asserts 'universal, distinctive fingerprints' but does not present a systematic comparison (e.g., across multiple principal quantum numbers or different ladder types) that would demonstrate the claimed universality independent of specific detunings or intensities. Without such data or an explicit parameter scan, the universality claim remains under-supported.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the two ladder types should be introduced with explicit term symbols (e.g., |n, l, j>) at first use rather than relying solely on descriptive labels.
  2. Figure captions should state the RF Rabi frequency, probe detuning range, and atomic species explicitly so that readers can assess the regime relative to the dressed-state approximation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the dressed-state analysis and the supporting evidence for the claimed fingerprints.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / theory section] Abstract and theory section: the central claim that the dressed-state picture cleanly isolates angular-momentum quantization effects (producing the reported presence/absence of the central EIT peak) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative bounds showing that RF Rabi frequencies remain well below decay rates, detunings, or multi-photon thresholds. If those conditions are violated, the predicted fingerprints can be washed out, undermining the assertion that the signatures are reliable indicators of ladder type alone.

    Authors: We agree that explicit bounds would strengthen the manuscript. The dressed-state treatment assumes the RF field acts perturbatively on the Rydberg manifold, consistent with the regime in which the observed EIT features remain narrow and the central-peak contrast is preserved. In the revised manuscript we will add order-of-magnitude estimates of the RF Rabi frequencies relative to the relevant decay rates and detunings, using the experimental parameters already stated in the text, to confirm that the perturbative condition holds for the data presented. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental results section] Experimental results section: the manuscript asserts 'universal, distinctive fingerprints' but does not present a systematic comparison (e.g., across multiple principal quantum numbers or different ladder types) that would demonstrate the claimed universality independent of specific detunings or intensities. Without such data or an explicit parameter scan, the universality claim remains under-supported.

    Authors: The universality claim rests on the angular-momentum selection rules within the dressed-state basis, which are independent of the specific principal quantum number once the ladder type (i.e., the sequence of angular-momentum changes) is fixed. The experimental data shown are representative of the two ladder classes identified theoretically. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that an explicit parameter scan would provide stronger empirical support. In the revision we will add a short supplementary figure or discussion showing that the central-peak presence/absence persists for at least one additional principal quantum number and for a modest range of RF intensities, thereby illustrating the robustness within the experimentally accessible regime. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental fingerprints derived from dressed-state classification without reduction to fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper frames its central result as direct experimental observation of EIT spectral features (presence/absence of central peak) under RF polarization rotation, classified via a standard dressed-state picture into two ladder types based on atomic term combinations. No equations are presented that fit parameters to data subsets and then rename those fits as predictions; no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are imported via self-citation; the spectroscopic characteristics are stated to arise from immutable atomic angular momentum quantization and are reported as measured outcomes. The derivation chain therefore remains independent of its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all claims rest on standard atomic-physics background.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5754 in / 1023 out tokens · 29050 ms · 2026-05-22T22:27:42.874447+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum-enabled complete RF-polarimetry with an optically-wired atomic sensor

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Rydberg atomic sensors map arbitrary RF polarization states to the Poincaré sphere via continuous changes in atomic eigenenergy spectra, remaining universal and calibration-free due to angular momentum quantization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    C. S. Adams, J. D. Pritchard, and J. P. Shaffer, Ryd- berg atom quantum technologies, J. Phys. B53, 012002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Jaksch, J

    D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Cˆ ot´ e, and M. D. Lukin, Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2208 (2000)

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    D. A. Anderson, R. E. Sapiro, and G. Raithel, Rydberg atoms for radio-frequency communications and sensing: Atomic receivers for pulsed RF field and phase detection, IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag.35, 48 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    C. T. Fancher, D. R. Scherer, M. C. S. John, and B. L. S. Marlow, Rydberg atom electric field sensors for commu- nications and sensing, IEEE Trans. Quantum. Eng.2, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    M. T. Simons, A. B. Artusio-Glimpse, A. K. Robin- son, N. Prajapati, and C. L. Holloway, Rydberg atom- based sensors for radio-frequency electric field metrology, sensing, and communications, Meas.: Sens.18, 100273 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    J. Yuan, W. Yang, M. Jing, H. Zhang, Y. Jiao, W. Li, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Quantum sensing of mi- crowave electric fields based on rydberg atoms, Rep. Progr. Phys.86, 106001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Zhang, Y

    H. Zhang, Y. Ma, K. Liao, W. Yang, Z. Liu, D. Ding, H. Yan, W. Li, and L. Zhang, Rydberg atom electric field sensing for metrology, communication and hybrid quantum systems, Sci. Bull.69, 1515 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Sedlacek, A

    J. Sedlacek, A. Schwettmann, H. K¨ ubler, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, and J. Shaffer, Microwave electrometry with Rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic res- onances, Nat. Phys.8, 819 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    D. A. Anderson, R. E. Sapiro, and G. Raithel, A self- calibrated SI-traceable Rydberg atom-based radio fre- quency electric field probe and measurement instrument, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.69, 5931 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    J. S. Otto, M. Chilcott, A. B. Deb, and N. Kjærgaard, Distant RF field sensing with a passive Rydberg-atomic transducer, Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 144003 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    C. L. Holloway, J. A. Gordon, S. Jefferts, A. Schwarzkopf, D. A. Anderson, S. A. Miller, N. Thaicharoen, and G. Raithel, Broadband Rydberg atom-based electric-field probe for SI-traceable, self-calibrated measurements, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.62, 6169 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Schmidt, S

    M. Schmidt, S. Bohaichuk, V. Venu, F. Christaller, C. Liu, F. Ripka, H. K¨ ubler, and J. P. Shaffer, Rydberg- atom-based radio-frequency sensors: amplitude-regime sensing, Opt. Express32, 27768 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    M. Jing, Y. Hu, J. Ma, H. Zhang, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Atomic superheterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed Rydberg spectroscopy, Nat. Phys.16, 911 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    J. S. Otto, M. K. Hunter, N. Kjærgaard, and A. B. Deb, Data capacity scaling of a distributed Rydberg atomic receiver array, J. Appl. Phys.129, 154503 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Cui, F.-D

    Y. Cui, F.-D. Jia, J.-H. Hao, Y.-H. Wang, F. Zhou, X.- B. Liu, Y.-H. Yu, J. Mei, J.-H. Bai, Y.-Y. Bao, D. Hu, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, F. Xie, and Z.-P. Zhong, Extending bandwidth sensitivity of Rydberg-atom-based microwave electrometry using an auxiliary microwave field, Phys. Rev. A107, 043102 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Liu, L.-H

    B. Liu, L.-H. Zhang, Z.-K. Liu, Z.-Y. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhu, W. Gao, G.-C. Guo, D.-S. Ding, and B.-S. Shi, Highly sensitive measurement of a megahertz rf electric field with a rydberg-atom sensor, Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 014045 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    H. F. Mathis, A short proof that an isotropic antenna is impossible, Proc. Inst. Radio Eng.39, 970 (1951)

    work page 1951

  19. [19]

    H. F. Mathis, On isotropic antennas, Proc. Inst. Radio Eng.42, 1810 (1954)

    work page 1954

  20. [20]

    Scott and K

    W. Scott and K. Hoo, A theorem on the polarization of null-free antennas, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.14, 587 (1966)

    work page 1966

  21. [21]

    Cloutman, M

    M. Cloutman, M. Chilcott, A. Elliott, J. S. Otto, A. B. Deb, and N. Kjærgaard, Polarization-insensitive mi- crowave electrometry using Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 044025 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Chopinaud and J

    A. Chopinaud and J. Pritchard, Erratum: Optimal State choice for Rydberg-atom microwave sensors [Phys. Rev. Appl. 16 , 024008 (2021)], Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 029902 (2024)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    S. Yuan, M. Jing, H. Zhang, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Isotropic antenna based on Rydberg atoms, Opt. Express32, 8379 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    J. A. Sedlacek, A. Schwettmann, H. K¨ ubler, and J. P. Shaffer, Atom-based vector microwave electrometry us- ing rubidium rydberg atoms in a vapor cell, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 063001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Y. Jiao, L. Hao, X. Han, S. Bai, G. Raithel, J. Zhao, and S. Jia, Atom-based radio-frequency field calibration and polarization measurement using cesiumnDJFlo- quet states, Phys. Rev. Appl.8, 014028 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Y. Wang, F. Jia, J. Hao, Y. Cui, F. Zhou, X. Liu, J. Mei, Y. Yu, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, F. Xie, and Z. Zhong, Precise measurement of microwave polarization using a Rydberg atom-based mixer, Opt. Express31, 10449 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    P. K. Elgee, K. C. Cox, J. C. Hill, P. D. Kunz, and D. H. Meyer, Complete three-dimensional vector polarimetry with a Rydberg-atom rf electrometer, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 064012 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Fleischhauer, A

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coher- ent media, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 633 (2005)

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji, The Autler-Townes Effect Re- visited, inAmazing Light(Springer New York, 1996) pp. 13 109–123

    work page 1996

  30. [30]

    2a) includes six dipole-allowed tran- sitions from theD 5/2(F= 1, m F = 0,±1) states that are omitted in Ref

    Our diagram (Fig. 2a) includes six dipole-allowed tran- sitions from theD 5/2(F= 1, m F = 0,±1) states that are omitted in Ref. 24 and that are also omitted in the reproduction of the diagram in Ref. 31

    work page

  31. [31]

    Schlossberger, N

    N. Schlossberger, N. Prajapati, S. Berweger, A. P. Ro- tunno, A. B. Artusio-Glimpse, M. T. Simons, A. A. Sheikh, E. B. Norrgard, S. P. Eckel, and C. L. Hol- loway, Rydberg states of alkali atoms in atomic vapour as SI-traceable field probes and communications receivers, Nat. Rev. Phys.6, 606 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    2b) includes six dipole-allowed RF- transitions from theD 5/2(F= 1, m F = 0,±1) states that are omitted in the equivalent diagram Fig

    Our diagram (Fig. 2b) includes six dipole-allowed RF- transitions from theD 5/2(F= 1, m F = 0,±1) states that are omitted in the equivalent diagram Fig. 5a in Ref. 31. As will be discussed, these must be taken into account to obtain the correct dynamics of the system even though the optical coupling field does not connect (blue arrows) any of these states...

    work page

  33. [33]

    A general rule for the number of spectral peaks is given in Ref. 21

    work page

  34. [34]

    Sedlacek,Microwave and Surface Electrometry with Rydberg Atoms, Ph.D

    J. Sedlacek,Microwave and Surface Electrometry with Rydberg Atoms, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oklahoma (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    M. A. Lombardi, T. P. Heavner, and S. R. Jefferts, NIST primary frequency standards and the realization of the SI second, NCSLI Measure2, 74 (2007)

    work page 2007

  36. [36]

    M. T. Simons, J. A. Gordon, C. L. Holloway, D. A. An- derson, S. A. Miller, and G. Raithel, Using frequency de- tuning to improve the sensitivity of electric field measure- ments via electromagnetically induced transparency and Autler-Townes splitting in Rydberg atoms, Appl. Phys. Lett.108, 174101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    M. T. Simons, J. A. Gordon, and C. L. Holloway, Si- multaneous use of Cs and Rb Rydberg atoms for dipole moment assessment and RF electric field measurements via electromagnetically induced transparency, J. Appl. Phys.120, 123103 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    C. L. Holloway, M. T. Simons, J. A. Gordon, P. F. Wil- son, C. M. Cooke, D. A. Anderson, and G. Raithel, Atom-based RF electric field metrology: From self- calibrated measurements to subwavelength and near-field imaging, IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat.59, 717 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Zhang, Y

    L. Zhang, Y. Jia, M. Jing, L. Guo, H. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Detuning radio-frequency electrometry using Rydberg atoms in a room-temperature vapor cell, Laser Physics29, 035701 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Monika, H. S. Rawat, and S. K. Dubey, RF E-field sens- ing using Rydberg atom-based microwave electrometry, MAPAN35, 555 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    D. H. Meyer, C. O’Brien, D. P. Fahey, K. C. Cox, and P. D. Kunz, Optimal atomic quantum sensing using electromagnetically-induced-transparency readout, Phys. Rev. A104, 043103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    R. Zhao, M. Feng, J. Zhu, Z. Li, J. Zheng, Z. Ma, Y. Shi, J. Tang, and J. Liu, Toward the measurement of mi- crowave electric field using cesium vapor MEMS cell, IEEE Electron Device Lett.44, 2031 (2023)

    work page 2031

  43. [43]

    L. W. Bussey, Y. B. Kale, S. Winter, F. A. Burton, Y.-H. Lien, K. Bongs, and C. Constantinou, Numerical model of n-level cascade systems for atomic radio fre- quency sensing applications, EPJ Quantum Technol.11, 77 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    B. Yang, Y. Yan, X. Li, H. Zhao, L. Xiao, X. Li, J. Deng, and H. Cheng, Sensitivity of Rydberg microwave elec- trometry limited by laser frequency noise, Phys. Rev. A 109, 032609 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Y. Wu, D. Xiao, H. Zhang, and S. Yan, Optimization strategies for operational parameters of Rydberg atom- based amplitude modulation receiver, Chin. Phys. B34, 013201 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Z. Feng, X. Liu, Z. Song, and J. Qu, Multi-parameter microwave quantum sensing with a single atomic probe, Sci. Rep.15, 5379 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    H. S. Rawat, D. Kara, T. Firdoshi, S. Garain, S. K. Dubey, A. K. Mohapatra, and V. N. Ojha, E-Field Strength Measurement using Rydberg Atom Based sen- sor for Microwave Metrology, in2020 XXXIIIrd General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science(IEEE, 2020) pp. 1–4

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Jiang, J

    Y. Jiang, J. Wu, M. Shi, H. Zheng, F. Guo, Z. Xiao, and Z. Zhang, Quantum weak measurement amplifies disper- sion signal of rydberg atomic system, Communications Physics8, 10.1038/s42005-025-02014-3 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02014-3 2025

  49. [49]

    Xie, K.-D

    C. Xie, K.-D. Wu, C.-L. Zou, W. Yi, X. Li, C.-F. Li, G.- C. Guo, and G.-Y. Xiang, Atomic electrometry based on heterodyne detection of microwave-induced optical phase shift in a rydberg medium, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 034015 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    A. Giat, K. Levi, O. Nefesh, and L. Stern, Subwave- length micromachined vapor-cell based rydberg sensing 10.48550/ARXIV.2504.09559 (2025), arXiv:2504.09559 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.09559 2025

  51. [51]

    Schlossberger, N

    N. Schlossberger, N. Prajapati, A. B. Artusio-Glimpse, S. Berweger, M. T. Simons, W. J. Watterson, D. Shylla, and C. L. Holloway, Calibration of Autler-Townes based electrometry in Rydberg states of alkali atoms, in2024 Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM)(IEEE, 2024) pp. 1–2

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    L. H. C. Patterson, K. E. Kihlstrom, and M. A. Ever- est, Balanced polarimeter: A cost-effective approach for measuring the polarization of light, Am. J. Phys.83, 91 (2015)

    work page 2015

  53. [53]

    Z. Gong, P. Zhong, and W. Hu, Diversity in machine learning, IEEE Access7, 64323 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    Nawrocki,Introduction to Quantum Metrology: The Revised SI System and Quantum Standards(Springer In- ternational Publishing, 2019)

    W. Nawrocki,Introduction to Quantum Metrology: The Revised SI System and Quantum Standards(Springer In- ternational Publishing, 2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    ˇSibali´ c, J

    N. ˇSibali´ c, J. Pritchard, C. Adams, and K. Weatherill, ARC: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali Rydberg atoms, Comput. Phys. Commun.220, 319 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun.184, 1234 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  58. [58]

    P. R. Berman and V. S. Malinovsky,Principles of Laser Spectroscopy and Quantum Optics(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2011)

    work page 2011

  59. [59]

    Three approaches for representing Lindblad dynamics by a matrix-vector notation

    M. Am-Shallem, A. Levy, I. Schaefer, and R. Kosloff, Three approaches for representing Lindblad dynamics by a matrix-vector notation (2015), arXiv:1510.08634 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [60]

    A. W. Schlimgen, K. Head-Marsden, L. M. Sager, P. Narang, and D. A. Mazziotti, Quantum simulation of the Lindblad equation using a unitary decomposition of operators, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023216 (2022). 0

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    I. I. Sobelman,Atomic Spectra and Radiative Transitions (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992)

    work page 1992

  62. [62]

    D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Kher- sonskii,Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum(World Scientific, 1988)

    work page 1988

  63. [63]

    H. J. Metcalf and P. van der Straten,Laser Cooling and Trapping(Springer New York, 1999)

    work page 1999

  64. [64]

    Auzi¸ nˇ s, D

    M. Auzi¸ nˇ s, D. Budker, and S. M. Rochester,Optically polarized atoms(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014)

    work page 2014

  65. [65]

    Shimoda, Line broadening and narrowing effects, in High-Resolution Laser Spectroscopy, edited by K

    K. Shimoda, Line broadening and narrowing effects, in High-Resolution Laser Spectroscopy, edited by K. Shi- moda (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,

    work page

  66. [66]

    dummy state

    J. E. Thomas and W. W. Quivers, Transit-time effects in optically pumped coupled three-level systems, Phys. Rev. A22, 2115 (1980) 1 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE 1 Coupling from a state of the intermediate level to a dressed Rydberg state To arrive at (2) we must evaluate P4 F=1 C F mF Jm J Im I ⟨F ′m′ F |r 0 |F mF ⟩ 2 . Using the Wigner Eckart theorem we have 4X F=...

    work page 1980