REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 53 references
Brownian motion and generalized Lifson-Jackson formula in quasi-periodic systems
T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the Lifson-Jackson diffusion formula, with its average redefined as an infinite spatial mean, stays exact for overdamped Brownian motion in quasi-periodic potentials.
desk verdict Right answer for zero tilt, but novelty overstated and the tilted-potential extension is asserted, not derived. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The two load-bearing pieces are (i) the asymptotic ansatz $p(x,t)=Z e^{-\beta U(x)}g(x,t)$, in which the long-time solution of the Smoluchowski equation splits into a Boltzmann weight and a Gaussian envelope $g$; and (ii) the Jacobi–Anger expansion $e^{A\cos\theta}=\sum_n I_n(A)e^{in\theta}$, which turns the spatial average over an incommensurate two-frequency potential into a product of Bessel functions because only the $n=m=0$ term survives. The same expansion, with the tilt force $F$ supplying phase matching between plane-wave components, carries the giant-diffusion calculation.
What would settle it
Simulate the overdamped Langevin equation for $U(x)=\cos x+\cos(\varphi x)$ with $\varphi=(\sqrt{5}-1)/2$ at $\beta=1$, extract $D^*$ from the long-time slope of $\langle x^2\rangle$, and compare with $D_0/[I_0(1)^4]\simeq0.389D_0$; a persistent relative deviation larger than numerical error would show the generalized formula fails.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that the Lifson–Jackson formula survives when periodicity is dropped: the effective diffusion constant still depends on the potential only through the two spatial averages $\langle e^{\beta U}\rangle$ and $\langle e^{-\beta U}\rangle$, provided these are redefined as infinite spatial means over an interval $[x,x+L]$ as $L\to\infty$. For $U(x)=U_a\cos(ax)+U_b\cos(bx)$ with $a/b$ irrational, the Jacobi–Anger expansion makes only the zero-frequency term survive in the product, so $\langle e^{\pm\beta U}\rangle=I_0(\beta U_a)I_0(\beta U_b)$ and $D^*=D_0/[I_0^2(\beta U_a)I_0^2(\beta U_b)]$. The same redefinition is carried into the tilted case $U(x)+Fx$, where the paper writes the effective diffusion constant in the first-passage form $D^*=D_0\langle I_\pm I_+ I_-\rangle/\langle I_\pm\rangle^3$ and evaluates it by Bessel expansion, predicting a giant-diffusion peak at a critical force.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that the tilted-potential diffusion formula proved for periodic potentials continues to hold, without proof, for quasi-periodic potentials; if that transfer fails, the giant-diffusion expressions and their numerical checks are unsupported.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- The formula extends to potentials with any number of mutually incommensurate cosine components: $D^* = D_0\prod_i I_0^2(\beta U_i)$.
- Giant diffusion survives in quasi-periodic systems, with $D^*$ peaking at a computable critical tilt force.
- At long times the probability density becomes a Boltzmann weight times a Gaussian envelope, so the Einstein relation $\langle x^2\rangle=2D^*t$ holds without periodicity.
- Potentials sharing the same spatial averages $\langle e^{\pm\beta U}\rangle$ give the same effective diffusion constant and the same Gaussian envelope, differing only in their Boltzmann weights.
- The predictions can be tested experimentally with cold atoms in quasi-periodic optical lattices or with levitated nanoparticles.
Reading between the lines
- Going beyond the paper's explicit claims, the same reasoning suggests that any deterministic bounded potential whose spatial mean exists, not only quasi-periodic ones, should yield Einstein diffusion with $D^*$ fixed by the two means; the numerics here only probe cosine sums.
- The phase-matching picture used for giant diffusion implies that a tilt $F$ resonant with a combination of the incommensurate frequencies could produce extra peaks in $D^*(F)$, a multi-resonance structure not examined in the paper.
- The paper's inverse question, whether the Einstein relation forces a Gaussian envelope, could be tested directly in slowly varying or random potentials; if the envelope failed there, the asymptotic ansatz would need correction at intermediate times.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript generalizes the Lifson-Jackson (LJ) formula for the effective diffusion constant of overdamped Brownian motion from periodic to quasi-periodic potentials. The authors propose redefining the spatial average in the LJ formula as a limit over a large interval, Eq. (11), and then use a Jacobi-Anger expansion to obtain a compact expression D* = D0/[I0^2(beta Ua) I0^2(beta Ub)] for a two-frequency incommensurate potential, Eq. (12), with a further generalization to arbitrary sums of incommensurate cosine potentials, Eq. (14). They also extend the tilted-potential giant diffusion formula of Refs. [38-40] to quasi-periodic potentials, obtaining expressions Eqs. (19) and (21). The theoretical results are compared with Langevin simulations in Figs. 2 and 3, showing agreement. The paper frames the generalization through three heuristic arguments (I)-(III) based on approximating quasi-periodic potentials by periodic ones.
Significance. If the central claims are correct, the paper provides a substantial generalization of a classical result in statistical physics: the LJ formula holds, after a proper redefinition of the spatial average, for quasi-periodic and more general bounded aperiodic potentials. The explicit Jacobi-Anger computation of the averages is rigorous and elegant, and the numerical simulations provide an external check with no fitted parameters. The new derivation of the LJ formula from the Smoluchowski equation, while not fully rigorous as written, offers a conceptually different route that may be of independent interest. However, the validity of the generalization rests on two load-bearing steps that are not fully justified in the manuscript: the zero-tilt derivation of the envelope diffusion equation for quasi-periodic potentials, and the transfer of the tilted first-passage formula to potentials without exact periodicity. These gaps, if not addressed, would undermine the advertised universality of the results.
major comments (2)
- [Physical model and diffusion constant D*] Equations (8)-(10) contain an under-specified and, for quasi-periodic potentials, unjustified derivation of the diffusion equation for the envelope function g(x,t). After Eq. (9), the replacement of the boundary term by R g_xx assumes both exact periodicity of e^{-beta U} and slow variation of g on the period scale. The subsequent sentence 'move e^{-beta U} to the left-hand side and repeat the above procedure' hides a second integration over x that is necessary to produce the LJ denominator <e^{beta U}><e^{-beta U}>; as written, the step is not reproducible. For quasi-periodic potentials, no finite L is an exact period, and the boundary term e^{-beta U(x+L)} - e^{-beta U(x)} does not vanish in the limit L -> infinity; thus the derivation cannot be extended by simple substitution. Since the zero-tilt generalization to quasi-periodic potentials rests on this derivation, it must be either made rigorous (e.g., via a two-scale or homogenization argument) or replaced by a direct derivation that does not rely on exact periodicity.
- [Giant diffusion with a tilted potential] Equation (15), the tilted-potential formula for D*, is assumed without proof to hold for quasi-periodic potentials. The original derivations in Refs. [38-40] are based on first-passage times over one exact period and on the renewal property that consecutive periods are independent and identically distributed. For a quasi-periodic potential, no finite length is an exact period, so neither ingredient is present. The paper states that this formula carries over by arguments (I)-(III), but those arguments are heuristic and, as noted above, partially circular. Equations (19) and (21) are direct consequences of Eq. (15), so if Eq. (15) does not hold for quasi-periodic potentials, the giant-diffusion predictions collapse. The numerical agreement in Fig. 3 is encouraging, but it tests only the final formula for one specific potential and one parameter range; it does not validate Eq. (15) as a general intermediate step. The authors should either re-derive Eq. (15) in the quasi-periodic setting or clearly state and justify the conditions under which it is expected to hold.
minor comments (5)
- [Throughout] The heading 'Giant diffusion with a titled potential' contains a typo; it should read 'tilted potential'. The same typo appears in the text and in the abstract's reference to the tilted case.
- [Equation (21)] Equation (21) contains an undefined index: the subscript of the second Bessel function reads I_{-(n'+k'+b')b}, where 'b'' is not a defined summation index and appears to be a typo. Please clarify the intended indices, which should likely be combinations of n', m', k', and l' analogously to the first Bessel function.
- [Equation (13)] The phrase 'assuming Einstein summation rule' in Eq. (13) is confusing because the sum over n and m is written explicitly. If the Einstein convention is intended, the explicit summation signs should be removed; otherwise, the mention of Einstein summation should be deleted.
- [Generalization to quasi-periodic potential] The paper would benefit from stating the precise class of potentials for which Eq. (11) and the subsequent results are claimed to hold (e.g., bounded Bohr almost-periodic functions, or functions with well-defined long-time averages). This would clarify the scope of the generalization to 'arbitrarily aperiodic yet bounded potentials' mentioned after Eq. (14).
- [Figure 3] The caption for Fig. 3(b) refers to the 'Boltzmann weight of the wave function'; in this classical Brownian motion context the term should be 'Boltzmann weight of the probability density' or simply 'Boltzmann weight', to avoid confusion with quantum wave functions.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the central Bessel result is an independent evaluation of the LJ average, and the quasi-periodic extension is an explicit assumption checked by Langevin simulation, not a circular reduction.
full rationale
The paper's advertised result, D* = D0/[I0^2(beta Ua) I0^2(beta Ub)], is obtained by substituting the ergodic spatial average defined in Eq. 11 into the standard Lifson-Jackson expression and evaluating the integral with the Jacobi-Anger expansion. This is a genuine analytical calculation rather than a restatement of an input, and the Langevin simulations in Figs. 2 and 3 provide an external check. The zero-tilt derivation (Eqs. 8-10) attempts to rederive the LJ formula from the Smoluchowski equation; while it contains an acknowledged tricky step and is not fully rigorous, it is not circular because no parameter is fitted and the target D* is not inserted as an input. The tilted-potential formula (Eq. 15) is imported from Reimann et al. for periodic potentials and extended to quasi-periodic potentials on the strength of arguments (I)-(III); this is an extrapolation and a correctness risk if the first-passage derivation does not carry over, but it is not a circular reduction: it is an explicit assumption, not a conclusion obtained from itself. There are no load-bearing self-citations, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no uniqueness theorem imported from the present authors. All cited external results are used as independent supports or as explicit assumptions, and the numerical simulations are self-contained checks against the analytic expressions. The paper therefore does not exhibit the specific equation-to-equation equivalence or fitted-parameter-to-prediction reduction required for a circularity finding.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption The overdamped dynamics is governed by the Smoluchowski equation (Eq. 5).
- domain assumption The asymptotic PDF factorizes as p = Z e^{-beta U} g with g a Gaussian envelope (Eqs. 6-7).
- standard math For incommensurate frequencies a and b, the spatial average (1/L) integral_0^L e^{i(na+mb)x} dx vanishes as L goes to infinity unless n=m=0.
- domain assumption The tilted-potential formula (Eq. 15) for the diffusion constant, originally derived for periodic potentials, applies to quasi-periodic potentials.
- standard math For a finite sum of incommensurate cosines, the average of e^{beta U} factorizes into a product of single-cosine averages.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Brownian motion and generalized Lifson-Jackson formula in quasi-periodic systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TVWBTKRS
@misc{pith2026250416527,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Brownian motion and generalized Lifson-Jackson formula in quasi-periodic systems},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TVWBTKRS}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16527}
}
abstract
Brownian motion in periodic potentials has been widely investigated in statistical physics and related interdisciplinary fields. In the overdamped regime, it has been well-known that the diffusion constant $D^*$ is given by the Lifson-Jackson (LJ) formula. With a tilted potential, this model can exhibit giant diffusion. In this work, we start from the basic argument that since any quasi-periodic potential can be approximated accurately using a periodic potential, this formula and the associated physics should also apply to the quasi-periodic potential after some proper redefinition. We derive $D^*$ from the Smoluchowski equation using the fact that its asymptotic solution is a product of a Boltzmann weight and a Gaussian envelope function. Then we analytically calculate $D^*$ in terms of Bessel functions. Finally, we study the giant diffusion with quasi-periodic potentials, generalize the corresponding formula to the condition with tilted potential under the same argument, and calculate $D^*$ analytically. This work generalizes the Brownian motion from periodic potentials to the much broader quasi-periodic potentials, which should have applications in interdisciplinary fields in physics, chemistry, engineering, and life sciences.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Xin Bian, Changho Kim, and George Em Karniadakis, “111 years of brownian motion,” Soft Matter 12, 6331– 6346 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[2]
Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy,
S. Chandrasekhar, “Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 15, 1–89 (1943)
work page 1943
-
[3]
The kramers problem: Fifty years of development,
Vladimir Ivanoviˇ c Mel’nikov, “The kramers problem: Fifty years of development,” Physics Reports 209, 1–71 (1991)
work page 1991
-
[4]
Brownian motors: noisy transport far from equilibrium,
Peter Reimann, “Brownian motors: noisy transport far from equilibrium,” Physics reports 361, 57–265 (2002)
work page 2002
-
[5]
Artificial brownian motors: Controlling transport on the nanoscale,
Peter H¨ anggi and Fabio Marchesoni, “Artificial brownian motors: Controlling transport on the nanoscale,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 387–442 (2009)
work page 2009
-
[6]
Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after kramers,
Peter H¨ anggi, Peter Talkner, and Michal Borkovec, “Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after kramers,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 251 (1990)
work page 1990
-
[7]
Albert Einstein, “ ¨Uber die von der molekularkinetischen theorie der w¨ arme geforderte bewegung von in ruhenden fl¨ ussigkeiten suspendierten teilchen,” Annalen der physik 4 (1905)
work page 1905
-
[8]
On the theory of the brownian motion ii,
Ming Chen Wang and G. E. Uhlenbeck, “On the theory of the brownian motion ii,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 323–342 (1945)
1945
Show all 53 references
-
[9]
Shortcuts to equilibrium with a levitated particle in the underdamped regime,
Damien Raynal, Timoth´ ee de Guillebon, David Gu´ ery- Odelin, Emmanuel Trizac, Jean-S´ ebastien Lauret, and Lo¨ ıc Rondin, “Shortcuts to equilibrium with a levitated particle in the underdamped regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 087101 (2023)
2023
-
[10]
Subkelvin parametric feedback cooling of a laser-trapped nanoparticle,
Jan Gieseler, Bradley Deutsch, Romain Quidant, and Lukas Novotny, “Subkelvin parametric feedback cooling of a laser-trapped nanoparticle,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 103603 (2012)
2012
-
[11]
Revealing the velocity un- certainties of a levitated particle in the quantum ground state,
M. Kamba and K. Aikawa, “Revealing the velocity un- certainties of a levitated particle in the quantum ground state,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 183602 (2023)
2023
-
[12]
For instance, if U(x) =P iUi cos(kix +ϕi), where all ki are mutual incommen- surate constant, and ϕi are arbitrary phases, we have D∗ = D0Q iI 2 0(βUi)
This diffusion constant can be obtained in much more aperiodic potentials. For instance, if U(x) =P iUi cos(kix +ϕi), where all ki are mutual incommen- surate constant, and ϕi are arbitrary phases, we have D∗ = D0Q iI 2 0(βUi). (14) This result means that our results can be fu...
-
[13]
On the self- diffusion of ions in a polyelectrolyte solution,
Shneior Lifson and Julius L. Jackson, “On the self- diffusion of ions in a polyelectrolyte solution,” The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics 36, 2410–2414 (1962)
1962
-
[14]
Diffusion coefficient for a brownian particle in a periodic field of force: I. large friction limit,
R. Festa and E.Galleani d’Agliano, “Diffusion coefficient for a brownian particle in a periodic field of force: I. large friction limit,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 90, 229–244 (1978)
1978
-
[15]
Mo- bility in a periodic potential: A simple derivation,
Leon Gunther, Michael Revzen, and Amiram Ron, “Mo- bility in a periodic potential: A simple derivation,” Phys- ica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications95, 367– 369 (1979)
1979
-
[16]
Effective diffusion coefficient of a brown- ian particle in a periodic potential,
D. L. Weaver, “Effective diffusion coefficient of a brown- ian particle in a periodic potential,” Physica A: Statisti- cal Mechanics and its Applications 98, 359–362 (1979)
1979
-
[17]
Voltage due to thermal noise in the dc josephson effect,
Vinay Ambegaokar and B. I. Halperin, “Voltage due to thermal noise in the dc josephson effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1364–1366 (1969)
1969
-
[18]
Quan- tum brownian motion at strong dissipation probed by superconducting tunnel junctions,
Berthold J¨ ack, Jacob Senkpiel, Markus Etzkorn, Joachim Ankerhold, Christian R Ast, and Klaus Kern, “Quan- tum brownian motion at strong dissipation probed by superconducting tunnel junctions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 147702 (2017)
2017
-
[19]
Josephson-junction threshold viewed as a critical point,
AR Bishop and SE Trullinger, “Josephson-junction threshold viewed as a critical point,” Phys. Rev. B 17, 2175 (1978)
1978
-
[20]
Nonlinear noninertial response of a quantum Brownian particle in a tilted periodic poten- tial to a strong ac force as applied to a point Josephson junction,
William T Coffey, Yuri P Kalmykov, Serguey V Titov, and Liam Cleary, “Nonlinear noninertial response of a quantum Brownian particle in a tilted periodic poten- tial to a strong ac force as applied to a point Josephson junction,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 054507 (2009)
2009
-
[21]
Thermal hopping and retrapping of a Brownian particle in the tilted periodic potential of a NbN/MgO/NbN Josephson junction,
Luigi Longobardi, Davide Massarotti, Giacomo Ro- toli, Daniela Stornaiuolo, Gianpaolo Papari, Akira Kawakami, Giovanni Piero Pepe, Antonio Barone, and Francesco Tafuri, “Thermal hopping and retrapping of a Brownian particle in the tilted periodic potential of a NbN/MgO/NbN Jos...
2011
-
[22]
Quantum effects in the current- 6 voltage characteristic of a small josephson junction,
Wilhelm Zwerger, “Quantum effects in the current- 6 voltage characteristic of a small josephson junction,” Phys. Rev. B 35, 4737 (1987)
1987
-
[23]
Di- recting brownian motion on a periodic surface,
David Speer, Ralf Eichhorn, and Peter Reimann, “Di- recting brownian motion on a periodic surface,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 124101 (2009)
2009
-
[24]
Collective and single particle diffusion on sur- faces,
T. Ala-Nissila, R. Ferrando, and S. C. Ying and, “Collective and single particle diffusion on sur- faces,” Advances in Physics 51, 949–1078 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730110107902
2002 doi
-
[25]
From subdiffusion to su- perdiffusion of particles on solid surfaces,
A. M. Lacasta, J. M. Sancho, A. H. Romero, I. M. Sokolov, and K. Lindenberg, “From subdiffusion to su- perdiffusion of particles on solid surfaces,” Phys. Rev. E 70, 051104 (2004)
2004
-
[26]
Diffusion on a solid sur- face: Anomalous is normal,
J. M. Sancho, A. M. Lacasta, K. Lindenberg, I. M. Sokolov, and A. H. Romero, “Diffusion on a solid sur- face: Anomalous is normal,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 250601 (2004)
2004
-
[27]
Brownian ratchets in physics and biology,
Martin Bier and, “Brownian ratchets in physics and biology,” Contemporary Physics 38, 371–379 (1997), https://doi.org/10.1080/001075197182180
1997 doi
-
[28]
Cold atom realizations of brow- nian motors,
Ferruccio Renzoni and, “Cold atom realizations of brow- nian motors,” Contemporary Physics46, 161–171 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510512331337945
2005 doi
-
[29]
Modeling molecular motors,
Frank J¨ ulicher, Armand Ajdari, and Jacques Prost, “Modeling molecular motors,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 1269–1282 (1997)
1997
-
[30]
Pulse propagation and electron acceleration in a corrugated plasma channel,
J. P. Palastro, T. M. Antonsen, S. Morshed, A. G. York, and H. M. Milchberg, “Pulse propagation and electron acceleration in a corrugated plasma channel,” Phys. Rev. E 77, 036405 (2008)
2008
-
[31]
Diffusion of colloidal rods in corrugated chan- nels,
Xiang Yang, Qian Zhu, Chang Liu, Wei Wang, Yun- yun Li, Fabio Marchesoni, Peter H¨ anggi, and H. P. Zhang, “Diffusion of colloidal rods in corrugated chan- nels,” Phys. Rev. E 99, 020601 (2019)
2019
-
[32]
Brownian transport in corrugated channels with inertia,
P. K. Ghosh, P. H¨ anggi, F. Marchesoni, F. Nori, and G. Schmid, “Brownian transport in corrugated channels with inertia,” Phys. Rev. E 86, 021112 (2012)
2012
-
[33]
Kinetic equations for diffu- sion in the presence of entropic barriers,
D. Reguera and J. M. Rub´ ı, “Kinetic equations for diffu- sion in the presence of entropic barriers,” Phys. Rev. E 64, 061106 (2001)
2001
-
[34]
Fractional brownian motion and motion governed by the fractional langevin equation in confined geometries,
Jae-Hyung Jeon and Ralf Metzler, “Fractional brownian motion and motion governed by the fractional langevin equation in confined geometries,” Phys. Rev. E 81, 021103 (2010)
2010
-
[35]
Nonergodic diffusion of single atoms in a periodic potential,
Farina Kindermann, Andreas Dechant, Michael Hohmann, Tobias Lausch, Daniel Mayer, Felix Schmidt, Eric Lutz, and Artur Widera, “Nonergodic diffusion of single atoms in a periodic potential,” Nat. Phys. 13, 137 – 141 (2017)
2017
-
[36]
Probability distribution of brownian motion in periodic potentials,
Matan Sivan and Oded Farago, “Probability distribution of brownian motion in periodic potentials,” Phys. Rev. E 98, 052117 (2018)
2018
-
[37]
Matan Sivan, Diffusion in Periodic Systems , Master’s thesis, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (2019)
2019
-
[38]
Brownian particles in periodic potentials: Coarse- graining versus fine structure,
Lucianno Defaveri, Eli Barkai, and David A. Kessler, “Brownian particles in periodic potentials: Coarse- graining versus fine structure,” Phys. Rev. E107, 024122 (2023)
2023
-
[39]
Giant acceleration of free diffusion by use of tilted periodic potentials,
P. Reimann, C. Van den Broeck, H. Linke, P. H¨ anggi, J. M. Rubi, and A. P´ erez-Madrid, “Giant acceleration of free diffusion by use of tilted periodic potentials,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 010602 (2001)
2001
-
[40]
Weak disorder strongly improves the selective enhancement of diffusion in a tilted periodic potential,
Peter Reimann and Ralf Eichhorn, “Weak disorder strongly improves the selective enhancement of diffusion in a tilted periodic potential,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 180601 (2008)
2008
-
[41]
Diffusion in tilted periodic potentials: Enhancement, universality, and scal- ing,
P. Reimann, C. Van den Broeck, H. Linke, P. H¨ anggi, J. M. Rubi, and A. P´ erez-Madrid, “Diffusion in tilted periodic potentials: Enhancement, universality, and scal- ing,” Phys. Rev. E 65, 031104 (2002)
2002
-
[42]
Giant diffusion of underdamped particles in a biased periodic potential,
Benjamin Lindner and Igor M. Sokolov, “Giant diffusion of underdamped particles in a biased periodic potential,” Phys. Rev. E 93, 042106 (2016)
2016
-
[43]
Critical asymmetry for giant diffusion of active brownian parti- cles,
Benjamin Lindner and Ernesto M. Nicola, “Critical asymmetry for giant diffusion of active brownian parti- cles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 190603 (2008)
2008
-
[44]
Diffusion in a bi- ased washboard potential revisited,
J. Spiechowicz and J. Luczka, “Diffusion in a bi- ased washboard potential revisited,” Phys. Rev. E 101, 032123 (2020)
2020
-
[45]
Giant diffusion and coherent transport in tilted periodic inhomogeneous sys- tems,
Debasis Dan and A. M. Jayannavar, “Giant diffusion and coherent transport in tilted periodic inhomogeneous sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. E 66, 041106 (2002)
2002
-
[46]
Universality of giant diffusion in tilted periodic poten- tials,
Kento Iida, Takuma Akimoto, and Andreas Dechant, “Universality of giant diffusion in tilted periodic poten- tials,” Phys. Rev. E 111, 024113 (2025)
2025
-
[47]
Enhanced diffusion and the eigenvalue band structure of brownian motion in tilted periodic potentials,
N. J. L´ opez-Alamilla, M. W. Jack, and K. J. Challis, “Enhanced diffusion and the eigenvalue band structure of brownian motion in tilted periodic potentials,” Phys. Rev. E 102, 042405 (2020)
2020
-
[48]
Langevin equation in heterogeneous land- scapes: How to choose the interpretation,
Adrian Pacheco-Pozo, Micha l Balcerek, Agnieszka Wy lomanska, Krzysztof Burnecki, Igor M. Sokolov, and Diego Krapf, “Langevin equation in heterogeneous land- scapes: How to choose the interpretation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 067102 (2024)
2024
-
[49]
Effective diffusion constant of stochastic processes with spatially periodic noise,
Stefano Giordano and Ralf Blossey, “Effective diffusion constant of stochastic processes with spatially periodic noise,” Phys. Rev. E 110, 044123 (2024)
2024
-
[50]
Quantum brownian motion in a periodic potential,
Matthew P. A. Fisher and Wilhelm Zwerger, “Quantum brownian motion in a periodic potential,” Phys. Rev. B 32, 6190–6206 (1985)
1985
-
[51]
Transport in time-dependent random potentials,
Yevgeny Krivolapov and Shmuel Fishman, “Transport in time-dependent random potentials,” Phys. Rev. E 86, 051115 (2012)
2012
-
[52]
Universal- ity classes of transport in time-dependent random po- tentials,
Yevgeny Krivolapov and Shmuel Fishman, “Universal- ity classes of transport in time-dependent random po- tentials,” Phys. Rev. E 86, 030103 (2012)
2012
-
[53]
Recti- fying fluctuations in an optical lattice,
P. H. Jones, M. Goonasekera, and F. Renzoni, “Recti- fying fluctuations in an optical lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 073904 (2004)
2004
Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.