Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Assessing Quantum and Classical Approaches to Combinatorial Optimization: Testing Quadratic Speed-ups for Heuristic Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.13035 v1 pith:TWIBHV5N submitted 2024-12-17 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumadvantageclassicalcombinatorialinvestigationsoptimizationanalysisasymptotic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many recent investigations conclude, based on asymptotic complexity analyses, that quantum computers could accelerate combinatorial optimization (CO) tasks relative to a purely classical computer. However, asymptotic analysis alone cannot support a credible claim of quantum advantage. Here, we highlight the challenges involved in benchmarking quantum and classical heuristics for combinatorial optimization (CO), with a focus on the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick problem. Whereas hope remains that a quadratic quantum advantage is possible,our numerical analysis casts doubt on the idea that current methods exhibit any quantum advantage at all. This doubt arises because even a simple classical approach can match with quantum methods we investigated. We conclude that more careful numerical investigations are needed to evaluate the potential for quantum advantage in CO, and we give some possible future directions for such investigations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools