Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ToxVis: Enabling Interpretability of Implicit vs. Explicit Toxicity Detection Models with Interactive Visualization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.09402 v1 pith:TWSCRT4Y submitted 2023-03-01 cs.CL cs.HC

classification cs.CLcs.HC
keywords contenthatespeechtoxvisonlineclassificationhatefulimplicit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rise of hate speech on online platforms has led to an urgent need for effective content moderation. However, the subjective and multi-faceted nature of hateful online content, including implicit hate speech, poses significant challenges to human moderators and content moderation systems. To address this issue, we developed ToxVis, a visually interactive and explainable tool for classifying hate speech into three categories: implicit, explicit, and non-hateful. We fine-tuned two transformer-based models using RoBERTa, XLNET, and GPT-3 and used deep learning interpretation techniques to provide explanations for the classification results. ToxVis enables users to input potentially hateful text and receive a classification result along with a visual explanation of which words contributed most to the decision. By making the classification process explainable, ToxVis provides a valuable tool for understanding the nuances of hateful content and supporting more effective content moderation. Our research contributes to the growing body of work aimed at mitigating the harms caused by online hate speech and demonstrates the potential for combining state-of-the-art natural language processing models with interpretable deep learning techniques to address this critical issue. Finally, ToxVis can serve as a resource for content moderators, social media platforms, and researchers working to combat the spread of hate speech online.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mapping Community Appeals Systems: Lessons for Community-led Moderation in Multi-Level Governance

    cs.HC 2025-09 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Discord moderators run structured appeals processes that use bots, group decisions, and rehabilitation-focused questions to decide who returns.

  2. Cracking the Code: Enhancing Implicit Hate Speech Detection through Coding Classification

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding six rhetorical codetype descriptions to frozen LLM embeddings improves implicit hate speech detection on Chinese and English benchmarks, though prompt-based gains are inconsistent.

Pith tools