Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Determining the WIMP mass using direct detection experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-ph/0703217 v2 pith:TX4IM43J submitted 2007-03-20 hep-ph astro-phhep-ex

classification hep-phastro-phhep-ex
keywords wimpmassassumptionswillwimpsheavylightpossible
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the accuracy with which the WIMP mass could be determined by a superCDMS-like direct detection experiment, given optimistic assumptions about the detector set-up and WIMP properties. We consider WIMPs with an interaction cross-section of \sigma_{\rm p} = 10^{-7} {\rm pb} (just below current exclusion limits) and assume, initially, that the local WIMP velocity distribution and density are known and that the experiment has negligible background. For light WIMPs (mass significantly less than that of the target nuclei) small variations in the WIMP mass lead to significant changes in the energy spectrum. Conversely for heavy WIMPs the energy spectrum depends only weakly on the WIMP mass. Consequently it will be far easier to measure the WIMP mass if it is light than if it is heavy. With exposures of {\cal E}= 3 \times 10^{3}, 3 \times 10^{4} and 3 \times 10^{5} {\rm kg day} (corresponding, roughly, to the three proposed phases of SuperCDMS) it will be possible, given the optimistic assumptions mentioned above, to measure the mass of a light WIMP with an accuracy of roughly 25%, 15% and 2.5 % respectively. These numbers increase with increasing WIMP mass, and for heavy WIMPs, m_{\chi} > {\cal O}(500 {\rm GeV}), even with a large exposure it will only be possible to place a lower limit on the mass. Finally we discuss the validity of the various assumptions made, and the consequences if these assumptions are not valid. In particular if the local WIMP distribution is composed of a number of discrete streams it will not be possible to determine the WIMP mass.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reconstructing Dark Matter Mass and Discriminating Standard and Non-Standard WIMP-Nucleus Interactions with Paleo-Detectors

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Paleo-detectors are projected to reconstruct WIMP masses from 1 GeV/c² to 1 TeV/c² and to reject canonical spin-independent or spin-dependent interaction hypotheses for most non-standard NREFT operators without recoil...

Pith tools