Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Median statistics estimates of Hubble and Newton's Constant

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1701.01789 v2 pith:TXBPMKBZ submitted 2017-01-07 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM

classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.IM
keywords medianstatisticsconstantestimatesassumptionscorrespondingdatadifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Robustness of any statistics depends upon the number of assumptions it makes about the measured data. We point out the advantages of median statistics using toy numerical experiments and demonstrate its robustness, when the number of assumptions we can make about the data are limited. We then apply the median statistics technique to obtain estimates of two constants of nature, Hubble Constant ($H_0$) and Newton's Gravitational Constant($G$), both of which show significant differences between different measurements. For $H_0$, we update the analysis done by Chen and Ratra (2011) and Gott et al. (2001) using $576$ measurements. We find after grouping the different results according to their primary type of measurement, the median estimates are given by $H_0=72.5^{+2.5}_{-8}$ km/sec/Mpc with errors corresponding to 95% c.l. (2$\sigma$) and $G=6.674702^{+0.0014}_{-0.0009} \times 10^{-11} \mathrm{N m^{2}kg^{-2}}$ corresponding to 68% c.l. (1$\sigma$).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparison of $R_h=ct$ and $\Lambda$CDM using DESI DR1 measurements

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using DESI DR1 distance measurements, flat LambdaCDM is decisively preferred over R_h=ct, driven almost entirely by the Lyman-alpha data point at redshift 2.33.

Pith tools