REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by
Low-Regularity Local Well-Posedness for the Elastic Wave System
T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The paper proves local well-posedness for admissible harmonic elastic waves with H^{3+} divergence-part data and H^{4+} curl-part data, and shows the H^{3+} level is optimal.
desk verdict First low-regularity LWP for a genuinely multi-speed wave system, but the proof leans on an unverified transfer of Wang's theorem and deferred geometric estimates; deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central object is the div-curl decomposition $\vec{U} = \vec{\phi} + \vec{\psi}$ with $\mathrm{curl}\,\vec{\phi}=0$ and $\mathrm{div}\,\vec{\psi}=0$, together with the two acoustic metrics $g(\partial\phi,\partial\psi)$ and $h(\partial\psi)$. The load-bearing mechanism is the ellipticity of $g-h$, which guarantees that the faster wave stays faster throughout the existence time, so that the null hypersurfaces of the faster metric are spacelike with respect to the slower metric. This produces a coercive cone-flux energy for the curl part along the faster-wave null cones, allowing the bootstrap to close via energy estimates, Strichartz estimates, frequency-localized decay estimates, and conformal energy estimates.
What would settle it
One concrete check is to test whether the curl equation (4.4a) satisfies the hypotheses of the cited quasilinear wave equation theorem at the required regularity: if a counterexample shows the asserted bound $\|\partial\!\partial\!\partial^2 \partial\psi\|_{L^2_t L^\infty_x} \leq T^{2\delta}$ fails for some admissible data, the bootstrap does not close. A second test is to run a numerical simulation of a smooth admissible harmonic elastic wave with divergence-part data in $H^3$: if no shock forms in finite time, the claimed optimality of $H^{3+}$ would need revision.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
For admissible harmonic elastic materials, the elastic wave system can be decomposed into a faster 'divergence-part' (curl-free) and a slower 'curl-part' (divergence-free), with the divergence part satisfying a quasilinear wave equation with metric $g(\partial \phi, \partial \psi)$ and the curl part satisfying its own quasilinear wave equation with metric $h(\partial \psi)$. The central claim is that, for data of size $D$ in $H^N$ for the divergence part and $H^{N+1}$ for the curl part with $3<N<7/2$, the classical existence time is bounded below in terms of $D$, the Sobolev regularity propagates, and the Strichartz estimate $\|\partial\!\partial\!\partial\!\partial \phi\|_{L^2_t L^\infty_x} \lesssim 1$ holds. The $H^{3+}$ regularity for the divergence part is claimed to be optimal, matching the $H^3$ ill-posedness barrier for general elastic waves.
Load-bearing premise
The curl-part energy and Strichartz estimates are borrowed from a known theorem for quasilinear wave equations, but the paper does not verify that this theorem's hypotheses actually hold for its curl equation with the rough metric $h(\partial\psi)$ and quadratic nonlinearity, so the bootstrap might fail to close if that transfer is invalid.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Local classical existence with data this rough would become available for admissible harmonic elastic materials with nonzero vorticity, not just for irrotational data.
- The regularity threshold for the divergence part would be sharp: no improvement below $H^{3+}$ is possible for this class, because $H^3$ data already allow shock formation.
- The Strichartz estimate $\|\partial\!\partial\!\partial\!\partial \phi\|_{L^2_t L^\infty_x} \lesssim 1$ would give the spacetime control needed to close energy estimates without Sobolev embedding above the classical threshold.
- The decoupling structure would imply that the curl part evolves essentially independently of the divergence part, with the curl part's higher regularity propagated along the flow.
- The multi-speed nature, previously an obstacle in compressible Euler and related systems, would be handled for this elastic model by the faster-wave-stays-faster property.
Reading between the lines
- Editorial inference: the sharp $H^{3+}$ result likely marks the boundary of low-regularity well-posedness for multi-speed hyperbolic systems; testing materials slightly outside the admissible harmonic class may reveal whether the decoupling is truly necessary.
- Editorial inference: the proof's dependence on the ellipticity of $g-h$ suggests that the existence time should shrink as the data approach the boundary of the hyperbolicity region; a quantitative relation between $T$ and the distance to that boundary is a natural next step.
- Editorial inference: in the exact admissible harmonic case where the curl part satisfies a linear wave equation, the loss of pseudo-irrotationality is governed by linear evolution, so vorticity creation could be studied explicitly.
- Editorial inference: the same strategy may give a 2D analogue with threshold $H^{11/4+}$ for the divergence part, matching the known 2D ill-posedness exponent, and the decoupling structure could make that proof substantially simpler.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This paper claims a low-regularity local well-posedness (LWP) result for the three-dimensional elastic wave system, restricted to the class of 'admissible harmonic elastic materials' introduced in Definition 2.2. After the div/curl decomposition of Section 3, the dynamics is recast as a coupled pair of quasilinear wave equations associated with two distinct acoustic metrics: a faster 'divergence part' phi whose metric g depends on both dphi and dpsi, and a slower 'curl part' psi whose metric h depends on dpsi; the admissible-harmonic ansatz makes the slow part decoupled. The main theorems (Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 5.1) assert that for 3 < N < 7/2, with divergence-part data of Sobolev order N and curl-part data of order N+1 inside the hyperbolicity region, the classical existence time is bounded below in terms of the data size, the data regularity is propagated, and the Strichartz bound (5.8) holds; if the equivalence conditions of Proposition 4.1 are satisfied, phi + psi solves the admissible harmonic elastic wave equations (2.14). The proof is a bootstrap: energy estimates for both parts (Section 7), reduction of the improved Strichartz estimate to dyadic frequency-localized and decay estimates (Section 8), conformal energy estimates on g-null cones (Section 9), null-flux estimates (Section 10), and control of the causal geometry via transport and Hodge equations for the connection coefficients (Sections 11-12).
Significance. The result, if fully established, would be the first favorable low-regularity LWP for a quasilinear system with multiple wave speeds, at the H^{3+} level for the faster part, matching the H^3 shock-formation barrier of An-Chen-Yin [7]. The architecture is coherent and several features deserve credit: the bootstrap is honest — the parameters epsilon0, delta0, delta, delta1 in (5.9) are constrained by algebraic inequalities and the closure uses a genuine strict improvement (delta1 > 8 delta0 with T* small); the admissible-harmonic restriction (2.11) is explicit and narrows the claim; and the paper states plainly which steps are deferred (e.g., Section 1.5.1, Section 7.1, Section 9.3). The genuinely new structural inputs that are proved in the text include the geometric div/curl formulation (Proposition 3.1), the h-spacelike property of the g-null cones (Lemma 9.1), coerciveness of the h-null flux (Lemma 10.1), the null-flux estimates (Proposition 10.2), and the transport/Hodge structure equations with the multi-wave-speed curvature terms (Proposition 11.11). My concerns are concentrated in the load-bearing estimates whose proofs are omitted or deferred, listed below.
major comments (5)
- [Section 7.1, Theorem 7.1] The stress-test concern lands: Theorem 7.1 is load-bearing and its proof is not in the text. It is the sole source of the curl-part controls (7.1a)-(7.1c), which enter Lemma 7.5, Proposition 7.2, the rescaled estimates (8.22), Proposition 12.7, and ultimately the closure of the bootstrap. The 'Discussion of the proof' asserts that the theorem follows from [48, Theorem 1.1], elliptic estimates, and div psi = 0, and then states 'we omit the details.' The manuscript never verifies that (4.4a), written for w = curl psi with h = h(dpsi) recovered from w through div psi = 0 and Lemma 6.4, is in the class of quasilinear wave equations to which [48, Theorem 1.1] applies; nor does it check that the data class (5.6b) maps to the regularity class required by that theorem, nor that its conclusions imply the precise weighted Strichartz bound (7.1b) with the dyadic weight nu^{2 delta0} and the factor T^{2 delta}. The transfer is plausible (w has H^N data with N > 3, above Wang's H^{2+} threshold), but a one-derivative loss at any point would break the rescaled curl-part estimates (8.22) and hence the geometry control. This gap must be repaired: either supply the verification, or restrict Theorem 5.1 to the case where the curl part is linear (3.7b), for which Remark 7.1's appeal to standard linear Strichartz estimates is appropriate.
- [Section 9.3 (Theorem 9.1) and Section 8.5] The boundedness of the conformal energy, Theorem 9.1, is the step that produces the decay estimate (Theorem 8.5), which in turn yields the frequency-localized Strichartz estimate (Theorem 8.3) and the bootstrap improvement (Theorem 8.1). Its proof is not given: Section 9.3.3 states that 'We omit the detailed proof of these steps, since they follow identically from [48, Section 4,7]' and that 'the proof of Theorem 9.2 follows the same argument as in [48, Section 7].' The surrounding reductions are deferred in the same style: the implication Theorem 9.1 implies Theorem 8.5 is referred to [23, Section 8] and [48, Section 4]; Theorem 8.5 implies Theorem 8.4 is deferred to [23, Section 8.5]; and Theorem 8.4 implies Theorem 8.3 is attributed to the TT* argument in [23, Section 8.6] and [48, Appendix B]. Since the rescaled equations (8.20) contain (dd)^2 Psi source terms and since the metric g depends on both dphi and dpsi, neither of which has an analogue in [48], the claim that the argument carries over verbatim is not self-evident. Please provide the full conformal-energy argument or a precise lemma-by-lemma dictionary from [48, Sections 4 and 7] with all hypotheses checked for the multi-speed system.
- [Section 5.4 / Section 1.5.1] Theorem 5.1 is stated as a local well-posedness theorem, but the text proves only a priori estimates. Section 1.5.1 states that Theorem 1.1 'provides a priori estimates for smooth solutions' and that the 'remaining aspects ... could be shown by deriving uniform estimates for sequences of smooth solutions and their differences,' with a citation to [35, Sections 2-3]. No existence argument (approximation by smooth data, compactness), no uniqueness statement, and no difference estimates are contained in the paper. This division of labor is standard in the literature, but as written the theorem overclaims what is proved. Either add the well-posedness argument, including the difference estimates, which in the multi-speed setting do not follow automatically from the a priori estimates for a single solution, or reformulate Theorem 5.1 as an a priori estimate and regularity-propagation theorem with the LWP statement made conditional.
- [Abstract and Section 1.1 (Remark 1.1)] The abstract states that the H^{3+} Sobolev assumption is 'optimal' for the divergence part. The cited H^3 ill-posedness of An-Chen-Yin [7] is a statement about the general elastic wave system, whereas the class treated here, the admissible harmonic materials (2.11), is a proper subclass. No argument is given that the plane-symmetric shock-formation examples of [7] belong to this subclass, so optimality for the class under study is not established by the matching argument presented. Concrete remedy: either verify that the examples in [7] satisfy (2.11), or soften the claim (e.g., 'optimal within the general class, and the expected threshold for the admissible harmonic class').
- [Section 4, Proposition 4.1] Proposition 4.1 is stated without proof, and the final sentence of Theorem 5.1 — 'if the equivalence conditions in Proposition 4.1 are verified, then U := phi + psi is the solution to the admissible harmonic elastic wave equations (2.14)' — depends on it, as does the interpretation of Theorem 1.1 as a theorem about the elastic system. The forward direction is the content of Proposition 3.1 (proved), but the converse direction, assembling phi and psi (with div psi = 0, curl phi = 0, and the prescribed P-terms and metrics) into a solution of (2.14), requires an argument that is not supplied. Please provide the proof or a precise reference, since the main theorem's connection to the elastic wave equations is load-bearing.
minor comments (4)
- [Section 7.1, Eq. (7.1b)] The first term on the left-hand side is not squared: the display reads ||(dd)^2 dpsi||_{L^2_t L^infty_x} + sum nu^{2 delta0} ||P_nu (dd)^2 dpsi||^2_{L^2_t L^infty_x} lesssim T^{2 delta}_*; for consistency of the powers with the right-hand side and with (1.22b), either the first term should be squared or the right-hand side should carry the corresponding power.
- [Section 1.1, Eqs. (1.6a)-(1.6b) and Section 5.4, Eq. (5.8)] The derivative count in the displayed Strichartz estimates is inconsistent: (5.8) states ||(dd)(d) phi^i||_{L^2_t L^infty_x} lesssim 1, while (1.6a) is typeset with a different count (the printed text is ambiguous between '(dd)^2 phi^i' and '(dd)(dd) phi^i'); under the paper's own convention (d = spatial, dd = spacetime), these displays should all carry the same number of derivatives, and the notation should be unified.
- [Section 11.2, footnote 48] The footnote notes that [47, Appendix C] is proved for 2 < N < 5/2 with the norm ||(dd)^2 g||_{H^{N-2}(Sigma_0)} in place of the present ||(dd)^2 g||_{H^{N-3}(Sigma_0)}, and asserts that the proofs are 'exactly the same'; since the transferred estimate (11.32) is used in the initial-foliation estimates of Proposition 11.3, a sentence explaining why the index shift is harmless would be useful.
- [Section 3, after Eq. (3.4)] The sentence 'where a_i is a constant' in the display preceding (3.4) refers to a symbol that no longer appears in the equation; this appears to be a leftover from an earlier draft and should be removed or corrected.
Circularity Check
No circular reduction in the derivation; the main bootstrap is self-contained conditional on external theorems. Minor self-citation for the optimality claim is not load-bearing.
full rationale
The claimed results are not obtained by fitting or by assuming the conclusion. The regularity exponents δ0, δ1, ε0 are fixed by the algebraic inequalities in (5.9) and the bootstrap closes through strict improvement (δ1 > 8δ0 and T∗ small), not by taking the desired Strichartz bound as an input. The restriction to admissible harmonic materials is an explicitly stated narrowing of the problem, with the general harmonic case left open, so it is not a self-definitional derivation of the target result. The curl-part estimates in Theorem 7.1 are delegated to Wang [48, Theorem 1.1], which is an external theorem rather than a result proved by assuming Theorem 5.1; even though the paper does not verify in detail that (4.4a) satisfies all hypotheses of Wang's theorem, that is a missing-support/correctness issue, not circularity. The main self-citation is the use of An–Chen–Yin [7] in Remark 1.1 to justify optimality of H^{3+}; this supports the advertised optimality statement but does not enter the local well-posedness derivation and is not equivalent to the theorem being proved. No uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to forbid alternatives, and no known result is merely renamed. The derivation chain is therefore not circular; the score reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing self-citation in the optimality discussion.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (5)
- ε0 =
(N-3)/10
- δ0 =
ε0^2
- δ =
1/2 - 1/q
- δ1 =
N-3-4ε0-δ(1-8ε0)
- T* (bootstrap time) =
small, depends on D
assumptions (8)
- standard math Littlewood-Paley product and commutator estimates (Lemmas 6.2-6.3) from [12, 48].
- standard math L^2 elliptic estimates (Lemma 6.4) and Schauder estimates (Lemma 6.5) from [12].
- domain assumption Theorem 7.1 (curl-part energy and Strichartz estimates) inherited from Wang [48, Theorem 1.1].
- domain assumption Control of the causal geometry (Proposition 12.8) and conformal energy bounds (Theorems 9.1-9.2) follow from arguments in [12, Section 10] and [48, Sections 4-7].
- standard math Initial foliation exists via Nash-Moser implicit function theorem [39], with the initial geometric estimates (Propositions 11.3-11.4) from [12, 47].
- domain assumption Hyperbolicity of the system and ellipticity of g - h: assumptions (2.13), (4.5), with initial data lying in the compact subset R̄ (5.7).
- ad hoc to paper The admissible harmonic ansatz (2.11) restricts the material class; the theorem is for this class, not for general elastic materials.
- ad hoc to paper The generalized schematic system (4.3)-(4.4) is the actual object of Theorem 5.1, with the connection to (2.14) made only when Proposition 4.1's equivalence conditions hold.
invented entities (2)
-
Admissible harmonic elastic materials (Definition 2.2, equation (2.11))
independent evidence
-
Schematic multi-wave-speed system (4.3)-(4.4) with a quasilinear curl part
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Low-Regularity Local Well-Posedness for the Elastic Wave System." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TXJBFTKM
@misc{pith2026241115886,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Low-Regularity Local Well-Posedness for the Elastic Wave System},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TXJBFTKM}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15886}
}
abstract
We study the elastic wave system in three spatial dimensions. For admissible harmonic elastic materials, we prove a desired low-regularity local well-posedness result for the corresponding elastic wave equations. For such materials, we can split the dynamics into the divergence-part and the curl-part, and each part satisfies a distinct coupled quasilinear wave system with respect to different acoustical metrics. Our main result is that the Sobolev norm $H^{3+}$ of the divergence-part (the faster-wave part) and the $H^{4+}$ of the curl-part (the slower-wave part) can be controlled in terms of initial data for short times. We note that the Sobolev norm assumption $H^{3+}$ is optimal for the divergence-part. This marks the first favorable low-regularity local well-posedness result for a wave system with multiple wave speeds.
Figures
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The null condition in elastodynamics leads to non-uniqueness
Convex integration yields nontrivial C^1 weak solutions of 2D elastodynamics from zero initial data under a weak null condition.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[48]
, A geometric approach for sharp local well-posedness of quasilinear wave equations , Ann. PDE 3 (2017), no. 1, Paper No. 12, 108. MR3656947
work page 2017
-
[7]
, Low regularity ill-posedness for elastic waves driven by shock formation , Amer. J. Math. 145 (2023), no. 4, 1111–
work page 2023
-
[1]
Rentaro Agemi, Global existence of nonlinear elastic waves , Invent. Math. 142 (2000), no. 2, 225–250. MR1794062
work page 2000
-
[2]
Albert Ai, Mihaela Ifrim, and Daniel Tataru, The time-like minimal surface equation in Minkowski space: low regularity solutions, Invent. Math. 235 (2024), no. 3, 745–891. MR4701880
work page 2024
-
[3]
Xinliang An, Haoyang Chen, and Silu Yin, Low regularity ill-posedness and shock formation for 3D ideal compressible MHD, 2021. arXiv:2110.10647
-
[4]
, The Cauchy problems for the 2D compressible Euler equations and ideal MHD system are ill-posed in H 7 4 (R2), arXiv, 2022. arXiv:2206.14003
-
[5]
$H^{\frac{11}{4}}(\mathbb{R}^2)$ ill-posedness for 2D Elastic Wave system
, H 11 4 (R2) ill-posedness for 2D elastic wave system , 2022. arXiv:2206.14012
work page Pith review arXiv 2022
-
[6]
, Low regularity ill-posedness for non-strictly hyperbolic systems in three dimensions, (survey paper), J. Math. Phys. 63 (2022), no. 5, Paper No. 051503, 16. MR4422205
work page 2022
Show all 53 references
-
[8]
Hajer Bahouri and Jean-Yves Chemin, ´Equations d’ondes quasilin´ eaires et effet dispersif, Internat. Math. Res. Notices 21 (1999), 1141–1178. MR1728676
1999
-
[9]
, ´Equations d’ondes quasilin´ eaires et estimations de Strichartz , Amer. J. Math. 121 (1999), no. 6, 1337–1377. MR1719798
1999
-
[10]
41, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993
Demetrios Christodoulou and Sergiu Klainerman, The global nonlinear stability of the Minkowski space , Princeton Math- ematical Series, vol. 41, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993. MR1316662
1993
-
[11]
Mihalis Dafermos and Igor Rodnianski, A new physical-space approach to decay for the wave equation with applications to black hole spacetimes , XVIth International Congress on Mathematical Physics, 2010, pp. 421–432. MR2730803
2010
-
[12]
Disconzi, Chenyun Luo, Giusy Mazzone, and Jared Speck, Rough sound waves in 3D compressible Euler flow with vorticity , Selecta Math
Marcelo M. Disconzi, Chenyun Luo, Giusy Mazzone, and Jared Speck, Rough sound waves in 3D compressible Euler flow with vorticity , Selecta Math. (N.S.) 28 (2022), no. 2, Paper No. 41, 153. MR4370374
2022
-
[13]
Disconzi and Jared Speck, The relativistic Euler equations: remarkable null structures and regularity properties, Ann
Marcelo M. Disconzi and Jared Speck, The relativistic Euler equations: remarkable null structures and regularity properties, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e20 (2019), no. 7, 2173–2270. MR3962844
2019
-
[14]
Thomas J. R. Hughes, Tosio Kato, and Jerrold E. Marsden, Well-posed quasi-linear second-order hyperbolic systems with applications to nonlinear elastodynamics and general relativity , Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 63 (1976), no. 3, 273–294. MR420024
1976
-
[15]
Pure Appl
Fritz John, Plane strain problems for a perfectly elastic material of harmonic type , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 13 (1960), 239–296. MR118022
1960
-
[16]
Hadamard materials and harmonic materials , Comm
, Plane elastic waves of finite amplitude. Hadamard materials and harmonic materials , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 19 (1966), 309–341. MR201113
1966
-
[17]
, Instability of finite amplitude elastic waves , Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium on Finite Elasticity (Bethle- hem, Pa., 1980), 1982, pp. 249–255. MR676668
1980
-
[18]
, Formation of singularities in elastic waves , Trends and applications of pure mathematics to mechanics (Palaiseau, 1983), 1984, pp. 194–210. MR755727
1983
-
[19]
, Almost global existence of elastic waves of finite amplitude arising from small initial disturbances , Comm. Pure. Appl. Math 41 (1988), 615–666
1988
-
[20]
Rational Mech
Tosio Kato, The Cauchy problem for quasi-linear symmetric hyperbolic systems , Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 58 (1975), no. 3, 181–205. MR390516
1975
-
[21]
Sergiu Klainerman, The null condition and global existence to nonlinear wave equations , Nonlinear systems of partial differential equations in applied mathematics, Part 1 (Santa Fe, N.M., 1984), 1986, pp. 293–326. MR837683
1984
-
[22]
, A commuting vectorfields approach to Strichartz type inequalities and applications to quasilinear wave equations , S´ eminaire:´Equations aux D´ eriv´ ees Partielles, 1999–2000, 2000, pp. Exp. No. X, 18. MR1813172
1999
-
[23]
Sergiu Klainerman and Igor Rodnianski, Improved local well-posedness for quasilinear wave equations in dimension three , Duke Math. J. 117 (2003), no. 1, 1–124. MR1962783
2003
-
[24]
, Rough solutions of the Einstein-vacuum equations , Ann. of Math. (2) 161 (2005), no. 3, 1143–1193. MR2180400
2005
-
[25]
, A geometric approach to the Littlewood-Paley theory , Geom. Funct. Anal. 16 (2006), no. 1, 126–163. MR2221254
2006
-
[26]
Sergiu Klainerman, Igor Rodnianski, and Jeremie Szeftel, The bounded L2 curvature conjecture, Invent. Math. 202 (2015), no. 1, 91–216. MR3402797
2015
-
[27]
Sideris, On almost global existence for nonrelativistic wave equations in 3D , Comm
Sergiu Klainerman and Thomas C. Sideris, On almost global existence for nonrelativistic wave equations in 3D , Comm. Pure. Appl. Math 49 (1996), 307–321
1996
-
[28]
Hans Lindblad, Counterexamples to local existence for quasilinear wave equations , Math. Res. Lett. 5 (1998), no. 5, 605–
1998
-
[29]
Hyperbolic Differ
Jonathan Luk and Jared Speck, The hidden null structure of the compressible Euler equations and a prelude to applications, J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 17 (2020), no. 1, 1–60. MR4109292
2020
-
[30]
Amalkumar Raychaudhuri, Relativistic cosmology. I, Phys. Rev. (2) 98 (1955), 1123–1126. MR69635
1955
-
[31]
Sideris, The null condition and global existence of nonlinear elastic waves , Invent
Thomas C. Sideris, The null condition and global existence of nonlinear elastic waves , Invent. Math. 123 (1996), no. 2, 323–342. MR1374204
1996
-
[32]
of Math 151 (2000), no
, Nonresonance and global existence of prestressed nonlinear elastic waves , Ann. of Math 151 (2000), no. 2, 849– 874
2000
-
[33]
Smith, A parametrix construction for wave equations with C1,1 coefficients, Ann
Hart F. Smith, A parametrix construction for wave equations with C1,1 coefficients, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 48 (1998), no. 3, 797–835. MR1644105
1998
-
[34]
Smith and Christopher D
Hart F. Smith and Christopher D. Sogge, On Strichartz and eigenfunction estimates for low regularity metrics , Math. Res. Lett. 1 (1994), no. 6, 729–737. MR1306017
1994
-
[35]
Smith and Daniel Tataru, Sharp local well-posedness results for the nonlinear wave equation , Ann
Hart F. Smith and Daniel Tataru, Sharp local well-posedness results for the nonlinear wave equation , Ann. of Math. (2) 162 (2005), no. 1, 291–366. MR2178963
2005
-
[36]
Jared Speck, A new formulation of the 3D compressible Euler equations with dynamic entropy: remarkable null structures and regularity properties, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 234 (2019), no. 3, 1223–1279. MR4011696
2019
-
[37]
arXiv:1204.1769
J´ er´ emie Szeftel,Parametrix for wave equations on a rough background ii: construction and control at initial time , 2012. arXiv:1204.1769
2012 arXiv
-
[38]
MR3860821
, Parametrix for wave equations on a rough background III: Space-time regularity of the phase , Ast´ erisque401 (2018), viii+321. MR3860821
2018
-
[39]
I: Regularity of the phase at initial time
, Parametrix for wave equations on a rough background. I: Regularity of the phase at initial time. II: Construction and control at initial time , Ast´ erisque443 (2023), ix+275. MR4671277
2023
-
[40]
Control of the error term , Ast´ erisque444 (2023), viii+314
, Parametrix for wave equations on a rough background: IV. Control of the error term , Ast´ erisque444 (2023), viii+314. MR4713494
2023
-
[41]
Shadi Tahvildar-Zadeh, Relativistic and nonrelativistic elastodynamics with small shear strains, Annales de Inst
A. Shadi Tahvildar-Zadeh, Relativistic and nonrelativistic elastodynamics with small shear strains, Annales de Inst. I’I.H.P. Physique th´ eorique69 (1998), no. 3, 275–C307
1998
-
[42]
Daniel Tataru, Strichartz estimates for operators with nonsmooth coefficients and the nonlinear wave equation , Amer. J. Math. 122 (2000), no. 2, 349–376. MR1749052
2000
-
[43]
III (Beijing, 2002), 2002, pp
, Nonlinear wave equations , Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. III (Beijing, 2002), 2002, pp. 209–220. MR1957533
2002
-
[44]
, Strichartz estimates for second order hyperbolic operators with nonsmooth coefficients. III , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (2002), no. 2, 419–442. MR1887639
2002
-
[45]
Taylor, Pseudodifferential operators and nonlinear PDE, Progress in Mathematics, vol
Michael E. Taylor, Pseudodifferential operators and nonlinear PDE, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 100, Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1991. MR1121019
1991
-
[46]
Hyperbolic Differ
Qian Wang, Causal geometry of rough Einstein CMCSH spacetime , J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 11 (2014), no. 3, 563–601. MR3261303
2014
-
[47]
arXiv:1408.3780
, A geometric approach for sharp local well-posedness of quasilinear wave equations , 2014. arXiv:1408.3780
2014 arXiv
-
[49]
, Rough solutions of the 3-D compressible Euler equations, Ann. of Math. (2)195 (2022), no. 2, 509–654. MR4387234
2022
-
[50]
Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University
Sifan Yu, Rough solutions of the relativistic Euler equations (2023). Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University
2023
-
[51]
02, 423–500
, Rough solutions of the relativistic Euler equations , Journal of Hyperbolic Differential Equations 21 (2024), no. 02, 423–500
2024
-
[52]
arXiv:2401.12796
Huali Zhang, Well-posedness of low regularity solutions for 3D relativistic Euler equations , 2024. arXiv:2401.12796
2024 arXiv
-
[53]
arXiv:2104.12299
Huali Zhang and Lars Andersson, On the rough solutions of 3D compressible Euler equations: an alternative proof , 2021. arXiv:2104.12299
2021 arXiv
Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.