Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 75 references

A Lightweight Incentive-Based Privacy-Preserving Smart Metering Protocol for Value-Added Services

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a smart-meter reporting protocol that keeps consumption data private while still supporting incentive-based value-added services.

desk verdict The supplied full text is an unrelated paper (MCP-Universe), so the smart-metering protocol's security and performance claims are unreviewable; treat as unverified, not as a valid submission. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.14703 v1 pith:TXYQEIAE submitted 2025-08-20 cs.CR

Farid Zaredar , Morteza Amini This is my paper
classification cs.CR
keywords smartmeteringlocaldifferentialprivacyhashchainsblinddigitalsignaturesanonymousoverlaynetworksvalue-addedservicesincentivemechanismsprivacy-preservingprotocol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that smart-meter readings can be reported in a coarse, adjustable form that a utility can actually use, without exposing individual households to privacy-invasive inference. It argues that combining local differential privacy, hash chains, blind digital signatures, pseudonyms, temporal aggregation, and anonymous overlay networks lets a meter hide who it is while still earning tokens and rewards. The motivation is concrete: raw smart-meter data can reveal lifestyle, device usage, and even political orientation, and third parties like insurers might exploit it. If the protocol works, utilities get useful data for load forecasting and value-added services while consumers keep control of their identity and fine-grained consumption patterns. The paper also reports practical cost figures of about 0.51 seconds and 4.5 MB of memory per reporting cycle.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the combination of local differential privacy, hash chains, blind digital signatures, pseudonyms, temporal aggregation, and an anonymous overlay network working together. Local differential privacy distorts individual readings so any single report reveals little; temporal aggregation and adjustable granularity coarsen the data; pseudonyms and blind signatures separate a household's identity from its consumption and token redemption; hash chains provide lightweight authentication; and the anonymous overlay hides the link between the meter and its reports. The adjustable granularity is what reconciles the twin goals of privacy and utility.

What would settle it

Run the protocol with realistic noise and granularity settings, then give an adversary access to overlay exit logs and token-redemption records; if they can link a redeemed token to a household by matching redemption times with report times or consumption patterns, the core privacy claim fails. Similarly, show that with utility-focused settings the reported data still permits device-level or lifestyle inference.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a lightweight smart-metering protocol can simultaneously prevent identity disclosure, preserve data utility, and enable automatic token redemption for value-added services. Privacy comes from local differential privacy noise on each reading, pseudonym-based reporting, temporal aggregation, and an anonymous overlay network, while authenticity and incentive handling come from hash chains and blind digital signatures. The protocol is designed to resist semi-trusted adversaries such as a curious utility provider and untrusted adversaries outside the system, without requiring heavy per-report cryptography.

Load-bearing premise

The privacy claim holds only under a precisely bounded adversary model in which the utility provider, overlay nodes, and third parties do not collude in ways the protocol does not account for, and only if the noise and granularity settings are strong enough to prevent re-identification through temporal correlation or token-redemption linkage.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Utilities could run incentive programs such as automatic token redemption without collecting fine-grained household load curves.
  • Regulators could tune the adjustable granularity and noise level to balance privacy protection against the utility of reports for different services.
  • The reported runtime of about 0.51 seconds and memory use of about 4.5 MB suggest the protocol could run on meter-class hardware rather than requiring powerful backend infrastructure.
  • If the privacy claim holds, third parties such as insurers would not be able to infer device usage, lifestyle, or political orientation from meter data.
  • The protocol is intended to resist both semi-trusted adversaries, like a curious utility provider, and fully untrusted outside adversaries.
  • Automatic token redemption would give consumers a tangible benefit from sharing coarse-grained data, making privacy-preserving metering more attractive to deploy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The privacy guarantee likely depends on how the noise budget and granularity are set; a deployment tuned for maximum utility could weaken the anonymity provided by local differential privacy.
  • Token redemption and report timing might create a side channel: an adversary who observes redemption events and overlay exit traffic could try to correlate them with specific households, so the protocol's claims need this linkage to be explicitly ruled out.
  • The performance numbers cover one parameter set; scaling to a large meter population would test the anonymous overlay network and key management under real-world load.
  • The same design pattern could be applied to other privacy-sensitive IoT reporting scenarios, such as water, gas, or health-monitoring devices, where coarse data and incentives both matter.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The submission, arXiv:2508.14703 (cs.CR), is described in the abstract as proposing a lightweight, incentive-based privacy-preserving smart metering protocol that combines local differential privacy, hash chains, blind signatures, pseudonyms, temporal aggregation, and anonymous overlay networks. The abstract claims that the protocol preserves consumer privacy while maintaining data utility, prevents identity disclosure, enables automatic token redemption, runs in approximately 0.51 s with about 4.5 MB of memory (1024-bit RSA, 7-day duration, four reports per day), and resists semi-trusted and untrusted adversaries. However, the supplied full text is a different paper: arXiv:2508.14704, 'MCP-Universe', a benchmark for evaluating LLMs on Model Context Protocol servers. The full text contains no description of the smart metering protocol, no adversary definitions, no equations for the LDP mechanism or other cryptographic primitives, no security analysis or proof, and no experimental methodology or results for the claimed performance figures. Consequently, the central claims of the abstract cannot be verified from the submitted manuscript.

Significance. If the claims in the abstract were supported, the protocol could be a meaningful contribution to privacy-preserving smart metering, particularly for incentive-based value-added services, as it would address both privacy and utility at meter-class computational cost. The proposed combination of LDP, hash chains, blind signatures, pseudonyms, temporal aggregation, and anonymous overlays is a plausible design space, and the reported performance numbers (0.51 s, 4.5 MB) are notable. However, because the manuscript under review does not contain the protocol itself, the paper's significance cannot be assessed: there is no derivable protocol, no formal privacy or security claim, and no evidence for the performance figures. The submission therefore currently provides no verifiable contribution, regardless of the potential merit of the underlying idea.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (Sections 1–5)] The supplied full text is arXiv:2508.14704, 'MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Servers', which is unrelated to the abstract of arXiv:2508.14703. The full text has no smart metering protocol, no adversary model, no equations for LDP or the cited cryptographic primitives (hash chains, blind signatures), and no security proof. This is not a partial omission: the core content that the abstract promises is entirely absent from the reviewable manuscript.
  2. [Abstract, 'resists semi-trusted and untrusted adversaries'] The headline privacy claim depends on a precise adversary definition, distinguishing semi-trusted (e.g., honest-but-curious utility provider or overlay nodes) from untrusted (malicious) parties, and on a formal analysis of how these adversaries behave under the protocol. No such definition or analysis appears anywhere in the supplied text. The claim is therefore unsupported and unverifiable.
  3. [Abstract, 'approximately 0.51s and about 4.5 MB of memory'] The performance figures are presented as experimental results, but the full text contains no experiments, no implementation description, no hardware/software environment, and no measurement methodology. Even setting aside the content mismatch, these numbers cannot be checked or reproduced. This is load-bearing because the abstract presents the protocol as lightweight based on these figures.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Title/abstract] The title and abstract describe a smart metering protocol, but the full text is a different paper on LLM benchmarking. The authors should ensure the submitted manuscript corresponds to the arXiv identifier and abstract; the discrepancy suggests a submission error.
  2. [References] The reference list comprises citations for MCP-Universe (e.g., [1]–[75] on Model Context Protocol, LLM agents, benchmarks) and contains no citations for local differential privacy, blind signatures, smart grid security, or related prior work on metering privacy. This further confirms that the full text is unrelated to the abstract.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity established; the supplied full text is an unrelated paper (MCP-Universe, arXiv:2508.14704), so the smart-metering protocol's derivation chain cannot be inspected.

full rationale

The only submitted evidence from arXiv:2508.14703 is the abstract, which describes a protocol construction (local differential privacy, hash chains, blind signatures, pseudonyms, temporal aggregation, anonymous overlay) and reports measured performance figures (0.51s, 4.5MB) and a privacy claim ('resists semi-trusted and untrusted adversaries'). No equations, security proof, adversary model, noise specification, token-redemption linkage analysis, or implementation details are present in the supplied 'FULL TEXT' section. That section is actually the full text of arXiv:2508.14704 ('MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Servers'), which has no overlap with the claimed submission. Under the hard rules, circularity may only be claimed when the paper can be quoted to exhibit a specific reduction (e.g., Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain). No such reduction can be exhibited from the abstract alone: the abstract does not define its terms in terms of its conclusions, does not fit parameters to a dataset and call the fit a prediction, and does not cite the authors' prior work as the justification for any result. The fact that the central claims are currently unverifiable due to the full-text mismatch is a correctness/evidence concern, not a circularity finding. Therefore the appropriate score is 0: no significant circularity is established by the available evidence.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract names five mechanisms plus an overlay network; the ledger records the configuration parameters the claims depend on. No equations or fitted values are visible, so free parameters are identified by role rather than by number. The security claims rest on standard assumptions about the underlying primitives and on the paper's own adversary model, which is not defined in the abstract. No new physical or mathematical entities are introduced in the abstract; the token redemption mechanism is a protocol feature, not an invented entity.

free parameters (4)
  • Local differential privacy noise budget
    Controls the noise added to each reading and therefore the privacy-utility tradeoff; not quantified in the abstract although the privacy claim depends on it.
  • Report granularity level
    The abstract says granularity is "adjustable"; the chosen granularity determines how much temporal and consumption detail remains correlated with identity.
  • Aggregation window and reporting frequency = 7 days, 4 reports/day
    Stated only in the performance scenario; these affect both data utility and the strength of temporal aggregation.
  • RSA key size = 1024-bit
    Chosen for the performance benchmark; the abstract presents it as a configuration input.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Blind digital signatures and hash chains provide the claimed authenticity and unlinkability properties under standard cryptographic assumptions
    The abstract asserts use of blind signatures and hash chains; their security is assumed from the literature, not shown in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The anonymous overlay network hides the link between pseudonym and IP address, resisting traffic analysis
    The abstract lists "anonymous overlay networks" as a component; its effectiveness is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper The adversary model "semi-trusted and untrusted" is defined and matched by the protocol analysis
    The abstract asserts resistance to these adversaries without defining them; the definition presumably lives in the missing full text.
  • domain assumption Local differential privacy noise composes correctly with temporal aggregation and does not leak through the utility provider's inference
    The privacy claim depends on the interaction of these mechanisms behaving as assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Lightweight Incentive-Based Privacy-Preserving Smart Metering Protocol for Value-Added Services." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TXYQEIAE

@misc{pith2026250814703,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Lightweight Incentive-Based Privacy-Preserving Smart Metering Protocol for Value-Added Services},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TXYQEIAE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.14703}
}
read the original abstract

The emergence of smart grids and advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) has revolutionized energy management. Unlike traditional power grids, smart grids benefit from two-way communication through AMI, which surpasses earlier automated meter reading (AMR). AMI enables diverse demand- and supply-side utilities such as accurate billing, outage detection, real-time grid control, load forecasting, and value-added services. Smart meters play a key role by delivering consumption values at predefined intervals to the utility provider (UP). However, such reports may raise privacy concerns, as adversaries can infer lifestyle patterns, political orientations, and the types of electrical devices in a household, or even sell the data to third parties (TP) such as insurers. In this paper, we propose a lightweight, privacy-preserving smart metering protocol for incentive-based value-added services. The scheme employs local differential privacy, hash chains, blind digital signatures, pseudonyms, temporal aggregation, and anonymous overlay networks to report coarse-grained values with adjustable granularity to the UP. This protects consumers' privacy while preserving data utility. The scheme prevents identity disclosure while enabling automatic token redemption. From a performance perspective, our results show that with a 1024-bit RSA key, a 7-day duration, and four reports per day, our protocol runs in approximately 0.51s and consumes about 4.5 MB of memory. From a privacy perspective, the protocol resists semi-trusted and untrusted adversaries.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Introducing the model context protocol

    Anthropic, “Introducing the model context protocol.” https://www �anthropic�com/news/model-context-protocol, November

    work page

  2. [2]

    Mcp the usb-c for ai

    H. Rick, “Mcp the usb-c for ai.” https://medium �com/@richardhightower/how-the-model-context-protocol-is- revolutionizing-ai-integration-48926ce5d823, April 2025. Accessed: 2025-06-30

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Model context protocol (mcp): Solution to ai integration bottlenecks

    L. Edwin, “Model context protocol (mcp): Solution to ai integration bottlenecks.” https://addepto �com/blog/model-context- protocol-mcp-solution-to-ai-integration-bottlenecks/, May 2025. Accessed: 2025-06-30

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Building mcp servers for deep research

    OpenAI, “Building mcp servers for deep research.” https://platform �openai�com/docs/mcp/. Accessed: 2025-06-30. 3https://github�com/openai/openai-agents-python 10 Salesforce AI Research 2025-09-22

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Gemini cli: your open-source ai agent

    Google, “Gemini cli: your open-source ai agent.” https://blog �google/technology/developers/introducing-gemini-cli-open- source-ai-agent/. Accessed: 2025-06-30

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Model context protocol (mcp)

    Cursor, “Model context protocol (mcp).” https://docs �cursor�com/context/mcp. Accessed: 2025-06-30

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Mcp overview

    Cline, “Mcp overview.” https://docs�cline�bot/mcp/mcp-overview. Accessed: 2025-06-30

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Evaluation of Instruction-Following Ability for Large Language Models on Story-Ending Generation

    R. Hida, J. Ohmura, and T. Sekiya, “Evaluation of instruction-following ability for large language models on story-ending generation,” CoRR, vol. abs/2406.16356, 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    Training verifiers to solve math word problems,

    K. Cobbe, V . Kosaraju, M. Bavarian, M. Chen, H. Jun, L. Kaiser, M. Plappert, J. Tworek, J. Hilton, R. Nakano, C. Hesse, and J. Schulman, “Training verifiers to solve math word problems,”CoRR, vol. abs/2110.14168, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  2. [10]

    The berkeley function calling leaderboard (bfcl): From tool use to agentic evaluation of large language models,

    S. G. Patil, H. Mao, C. Cheng-Jie Ji, F. Yan, V . Suresh, I. Stoica, and J. E. Gonzalez, “The berkeley function calling leaderboard (bfcl): From tool use to agentic evaluation of large language models,” in Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning, 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    MCP-RADAR: A multi-dimensional benchmark for evaluating tool use capabilities in large language models,

    X. Gao, S. Xie, J. Zhai, S. Ma, and C. Shen, “MCP-RADAR: A multi-dimensional benchmark for evaluating tool use capabilities in large language models,” CoRR, vol. abs/2505.16700, 2025

    2025

  4. [12]

    Evaluating large language models trained on code,

    M. Chen, J. Tworek, H. Jun, Q. Yuan, H. P. de Oliveira Pinto, J. Kaplan, H. Edwards, Y . Burda, N. Joseph, G. Brockman, A. Ray, R. Puri, G. Krueger, M. Petrov, H. Khlaaf, G. Sastry, P. Mishkin, B. Chan, S. Gray, N. Ryder, M. Pavlov, A. Power, L. Kaiser, M. Bavarian, C. Winter,...

    2021 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Mcpworld: A unified benchmarking testbed for api, gui, and hybrid computer use agents,

    Y . Yan, S. Wang, J. Du, Y . Yang, Y . Shan, Q. Qiu, X. Jia, X. Wang, X. Yuan, X. Han, M. Qin, Y . Chen, C. Peng, S. Wang, and M. Xu, “Mcpworld: A unified benchmarking testbed for api, gui, and hybrid computer use agents,” CoRR, vol. abs/2506.07672, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena,

    L. Zheng, W. Chiang, Y . Sheng, S. Zhuang, Z. Wu, Y . Zhuang, Z. Lin, Z. Li, D. Li, E. P. Xing, H. Zhang, J. E. Gonzalez, and I. Stoica, “Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neur...

    2023

  7. [15]

    Mcpeval: Automatic mcp-based deep evaluation for ai agent models,

    Z. Liu, J. Qiu, S. Wang, J. Zhang, Z. Liu, R. Ram, H. Chen, W. Yao, S. Heinecke, S. Savarese, H. Wang, and C. Xiong, “Mcpeval: Automatic mcp-based deep evaluation for ai agent models,” 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Livemcpbench: Can agents navigate an ocean of mcp tools?,

    G. Mo, W. Zhong, J. Chen, X. Chen, Y . Lu, H. Lin, B. He, X. Han, and L. Sun, “Livemcpbench: Can agents navigate an ocean of mcp tools?,” 2025

    2025

  9. [17]

    A survey on large language model based autonomous agents,

    L. Wang, C. Ma, X. Feng, Z. Zhang, H. Yang, J. Zhang, Z. Chen, J. Tang, X. Chen, Y . Lin, W. X. Zhao, Z. Wei, and J. Wen, “A survey on large language model based autonomous agents,”Frontiers Comput. Sci., vol. 18, no. 6, p. 186345, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Self-play with execution feedback: Improving instruction- following capabilities of large language models,

    G. Dong, K. Lu, C. Li, T. Xia, B. Yu, C. Zhou, and J. Zhou, “Self-play with execution feedback: Improving instruction- following capabilities of large language models,” in The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, Singapore, April 24-28, 2...

    2025

  11. [19]

    Mia-bench: Towards better instruction following evaluation of multimodal llms,

    Y . Qian, H. Ye, J. Fauconnier, P. Grasch, Y . Yang, and Z. Gan, “Mia-bench: Towards better instruction following evaluation of multimodal llms,” in The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, Singapore, April 24-28, 2025, OpenReview.net, 2025

    2025

  12. [20]

    Generalizing verifiable instruction following,

    V . Pyatkin, S. Malik, V . Graf, H. Ivison, S. Huang, P. Dasigi, N. Lambert, and H. Hajishirzi, “Generalizing verifiable instruction following,” 2025

    2025

  13. [21]

    Towards large reasoning models: A survey of reinforced reasoning with large language models,

    F. Xu, Q. Hao, Z. Zong, J. Wang, Y . Zhang, J. Wang, X. Lan, J. Gong, T. Ouyang, F. Meng, C. Shao, Y . Yan, Q. Yang, Y . Song, S. Ren, X. Hu, Y . Li, J. Feng, C. Gao, and Y . Li, “Towards large reasoning models: A survey of reinforced reasoning with large language models,” CoR...

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,

    J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, B. Ichter, F. Xia, E. H. Chi, Q. V . Le, and D. Zhou, “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing ...

    2022

  15. [23]

    Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models,

    S. Yao, D. Yu, J. Zhao, I. Shafran, T. Griffiths, Y . Cao, and K. Narasimhan, “Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023, Ne...

    2023

  16. [24]

    What, how, where, and how well? A survey on test-time scaling in large language models,

    Q. Zhang, F. Lyu, Z. Sun, L. Wang, W. Zhang, Z. Guo, Y . Wang, I. King, X. Liu, and C. Ma, “What, how, where, and how well? A survey on test-time scaling in large language models,” CoRR, vol. abs/2503.24235, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Tool learning with large language models: a survey,

    C. Qu, S. Dai, X. Wei, H. Cai, S. Wang, D. Yin, J. Xu, and J. Wen, “Tool learning with large language models: a survey,” Frontiers Comput. Sci., vol. 19, no. 8, p. 198343, 2025

    2025

  18. [27]

    Large action models: From inception to implementation,

    L. Wang, F. Yang, C. Zhang, J. Lu, J. Qian, S. He, P. Zhao, B. Qiao, R. Huang, S. Qin, Q. Su, J. Ye, Y . Zhang, J. Lou, Q. Lin, S. Rajmohan, D. Zhang, and Q. Zhang, “Large action models: From inception to implementation,” CoRR, vol. abs/2412.10047, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  19. [28]

    xlam: A family of large action models to empower AI agent systems,

    J. Zhang, T. Lan, M. Zhu, Z. Liu, T. Hoang, S. Kokane, W. Yao, J. Tan, A. Prabhakar, H. Chen, Z. Liu, Y . Feng, T. M. Awalgaonkar, R. R. N., Z. Chen, R. Xu, J. C. Niebles, S. Heinecke, H. Wang, S. Savarese, and C. Xiong, “xlam: A family of large action models to empower AI age...

    2025

  20. [29]

    React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models,

    S. Yao, J. Zhao, D. Yu, N. Du, I. Shafran, K. R. Narasimhan, and Y . Cao, “React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023, OpenReview.net, 2023

    2023

  21. [30]

    Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learning,

    N. Shinn, F. Cassano, A. Gopinath, K. Narasimhan, and S. Yao, “Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learning,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023, NeurIPS 2023, New Orleans, L...

    2023

  22. [31]

    Plan-and-solve prompting: Improving zero-shot chain-of- thought reasoning by large language models,

    L. Wang, W. Xu, Y . Lan, Z. Hu, Y . Lan, R. K. Lee, and E. Lim, “Plan-and-solve prompting: Improving zero-shot chain-of- thought reasoning by large language models,” inProceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Paper...

    2023

  23. [32]

    Autogen: Enabling next-gen LLM applications via multi-agent conversation framework,

    Q. Wu, G. Bansal, J. Zhang, Y . Wu, S. Zhang, E. Zhu, B. Li, L. Jiang, X. Zhang, and C. Wang, “Autogen: Enabling next-gen LLM applications via multi-agent conversation framework,”CoRR, vol. abs/2308.08155, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Metagpt: Meta programming for A multi-agent collaborative framework,

    S. Hong, M. Zhuge, J. Chen, X. Zheng, Y . Cheng, J. Wang, C. Zhang, Z. Wang, S. K. S. Yau, Z. Lin, L. Zhou, C. Ran, L. Xiao, C. Wu, and J. Schmidhuber, “Metagpt: Meta programming for A multi-agent collaborative framework,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Re...

    2024

  25. [34]

    Camel: Communicative agents for

    G. Li, H. A. A. K. Hammoud, H. Itani, D. Khizbullin, and B. Ghanem, “Camel: Communicative agents for ”mind” exploration of large language model society,” inThirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023

    2023

  26. [35]

    Build resilient language agents as graphs

    LangChain, “Build resilient language agents as graphs..” https://github �com/langchain-ai/langgraph, 2024. GitHub Repository, Accessed: 2025-06-30

    2024

  27. [36]

    Gpt-4o system card,

    A. Hurst, A. Lerer, A. P. Goucher, A. Perelman, A. Ramesh, A. Clark, A. Ostrow, A. Welihinda, A. Hayes, A. Radford, A. Madry, A. Baker-Whitcomb, A. Beutel, A. Borzunov, A. Carney, A. Chow, A. Kirillov, A. Nichol, A. Paino, A. Renzin, A. T. Passos, A. Kirillov, A. Christakis, A...

    2024 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models,

    R. Anil, S. Borgeaud, Y . Wu, J. Alayrac, J. Yu, R. Soricut, J. Schalkwyk, A. M. Dai, A. Hauth, K. Millican, D. Silver, S. Petrov, M. Johnson, I. Antonoglou, J. Schrittwieser, A. Glaese, J. Chen, E. Pitler, T. P. Lillicrap, A. Lazaridou, O. Firat, J. Molloy, M. Isard, P. R. Ba...

    2023 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Os agents: A survey on mllm-based agents for computer, phone and browser use,

    X. Hu, T. Xiong, B. Yi, Z. Wei, R. Xiao, Y . Chen, J. Ye, M. Tao, X. Zhou, Z. Zhao,et al., “Os agents: A survey on mllm-based agents for computer, phone and browser use,” 2024

    2024

  30. [39]

    Aria-ui: Visual grounding for GUI instructions,

    Y . Yang, Y . Wang, D. Li, Z. Luo, B. Chen, C. Huang, and J. Li, “Aria-ui: Visual grounding for GUI instructions,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2025, Vienna, Austria, July 27 - August 1, 2025 (W. Che, J. Nabende, E. Shutova, and M. T. Pilehv...

    2025

  31. [40]

    Screenspot-pro: GUI grounding for professional high-resolution computer use,

    K. Li, Z. Meng, H. Lin, Z. Luo, Y . Tian, J. Ma, Z. Huang, and T. Chua, “Screenspot-pro: GUI grounding for professional high-resolution computer use,” CoRR, vol. abs/2504.07981, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  32. [41]

    GTA1: GUI test-time scaling agent,

    Y . Yang, D. Li, Y . Dai, Y . Yang, Z. Luo, Z. Zhao, Z. Hu, J. Huang, A. Saha, Z. Chen, R. Xu, L. Pan, C. Xiong, and J. Li, “GTA1: GUI test-time scaling agent,” CoRR, vol. abs/2507.05791, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Computer-using agent: Introducing a universal interface for ai to interact with the digital world,

    OpenAI, “Computer-using agent: Introducing a universal interface for ai to interact with the digital world,” 2025

    2025

  34. [43]

    Introducing computer use, a new claude 3.5 sonnet, and claude 3.5 haiku

    Anthropic, “Introducing computer use, a new claude 3.5 sonnet, and claude 3.5 haiku.” https://www �anthropic�com/news/3- 5-models-and-computer-use, October 2024. Accessed: 2025-06-30

    2024

  35. [44]

    UI-TARS: pioneering automated GUI interaction with native agents,

    Y . Qin, Y . Ye, J. Fang, H. Wang, S. Liang, S. Tian, J. Zhang, J. Li, Y . Li, S. Huang, W. Zhong, K. Li, J. Yang, Y . Miao, W. Lin, L. Liu, X. Jiang, Q. Ma, J. Li, X. Xiao, K. Cai, C. Li, Y . Zheng, C. Jin, C. Li, X. Zhou, M. Wang, H. Chen, Z. Li, H. Yang, H. Liu, F. Lin, T. ...

    2025 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Reinforcement learning on web interfaces using workflow-guided exploration,

    E. Z. Liu, K. Guu, P. Pasupat, T. Shi, and P. Liang, “Reinforcement learning on web interfaces using workflow-guided exploration,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2018

    2018

  37. [46]

    Mind2web: Towards a generalist agent for the web,

    X. Deng, Y . Gu, B. Zheng, S. Chen, S. Stevens, B. Wang, H. Sun, and Y . Su, “Mind2web: Towards a generalist agent for the web,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023, NeurIPS 2023, New Orleans,...

    2023

  38. [47]

    Mind2web 2: Evaluating agentic search with agent-as-a-judge,

    B. Gou, Z. Huang, Y . Ning, Y . Gu, M. Lin, W. Qi, A. Kopanev, B. Yu, B. J. Guti´errez, Y . Shu, C. H. Song, J. Wu, S. Chen, H. N. Moussa, T. Zhang, J. Xie, Y . Li, T. Xue, Z. Liao, K. Zhang, B. Zheng, Z. Cai, V . Rozgic, M. Ziyadi, H. Sun, and Y . Su, “Mind2web 2: Evaluating ...

    2025

  39. [48]

    Weblinx: Real-world website navigation with multi-turn dialogue,

    X. H. L `u, Z. Kasner, and S. Reddy, “Weblinx: Real-world website navigation with multi-turn dialogue,” in Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024, OpenReview.net, 2024

    2024

  40. [49]

    Assistantbench: Can web agents solve realistic and time-consuming tasks?,

    O. Yoran, S. J. Amouyal, C. Malaviya, B. Bogin, O. Press, and J. Berant, “Assistantbench: Can web agents solve realistic and time-consuming tasks?,” in Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2024, Miami, FL, USA, November ...

    2024

  41. [50]

    Webarena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents,

    S. Zhou, F. F. Xu, H. Zhu, X. Zhou, R. Lo, A. Sridhar, X. Cheng, T. Ou, Y . Bisk, D. Fried, U. Alon, and G. Neubig, “Webarena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, A...

    2024

  42. [51]

    Visualwebarena: Evaluating multimodal agents on realistic visual web tasks,

    J. Y . Koh, R. Lo, L. Jang, V . Duvvur, M. C. Lim, P. Huang, G. Neubig, S. Zhou, R. Salakhutdinov, and D. Fried, “Visualwebarena: Evaluating multimodal agents on realistic visual web tasks,” inProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguist...

    2024

  43. [52]

    Osworld: Benchmarking multimodal agents for open-ended tasks in real computer environments,

    T. Xie, D. Zhang, J. Chen, X. Li, S. Zhao, R. Cao, T. J. Hua, Z. Cheng, D. Shin, F. Lei, Y . Liu, Y . Xu, S. Zhou, S. Savarese, C. Xiong, V . Zhong, and T. Yu, “Osworld: Benchmarking multimodal agents for open-ended tasks in real computer environments,” in Advances in Neural I...

    2024

  44. [53]

    Windows agent arena: Evaluating multi-modal OS agents at scale,

    R. Bonatti, D. Zhao, F. Bonacci, D. Dupont, S. Abdali, Y . Li, Y . Lu, J. Wagle, K. Koishida, A. Bucker, L. Jang, and Z. Hui, “Windows agent arena: Evaluating multi-modal OS agents at scale,” CoRR, vol. abs/2409.08264, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Ui-vision: A desktop-centric GUI benchmark for visual perception and interaction,

    S. Nayak, X. Jian, K. Q. Lin, J. A. Rodriguez, M. Kalsi, R. Awal, N. Chapados, M. T. ¨Ozsu, A. Agrawal, D. V´azquez, C. Pal, P. Taslakian, S. Gella, and S. Rajeswar, “Ui-vision: A desktop-centric GUI benchmark for visual perception and interaction,” CoRR, vol. abs/2503.15661, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Swe-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues?,

    C. E. Jimenez, J. Yang, A. Wettig, S. Yao, K. Pei, O. Press, and K. R. Narasimhan, “Swe-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues?,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024, OpenReview.net...

    2024

  47. [56]

    Devbench: A comprehensive benchmark for software development,

    B. Li, W. Wu, Z. Tang, L. Shi, J. Yang, J. Li, S. Yao, C. Qian, B. Hui, Q. Zhang, Z. Yu, H. Du, P. Yang, D. Lin, C. Peng, and K. Chen, “Devbench: A comprehensive benchmark for software development,”CoRR, vol. abs/2403.08604, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Api-bank: A comprehensive benchmark for tool-augmented llms,

    M. Li, Y . Zhao, B. Yu, F. Song, H. Li, H. Yu, Z. Li, F. Huang, and Y . Li, “Api-bank: A comprehensive benchmark for tool-augmented llms,” in Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2023, Singapore, December 6-10, 2023 (H. ...

    2023

  49. [58]

    Toolllm: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world apis,

    Y . Qin, S. Liang, Y . Ye, K. Zhu, L. Yan, Y . Lu, Y . Lin, X. Cong, X. Tang, B. Qian, S. Zhao, L. Hong, R. Tian, R. Xie, J. Zhou, M. Gerstein, D. Li, Z. Liu, and M. Sun, “Toolllm: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world apis,” in The Twelfth Internation...

    2024

  50. [59]

    GAIA: a benchmark for general AI assistants,

    G. Mialon, C. Fourrier, T. Wolf, Y . LeCun, and T. Scialom, “GAIA: a benchmark for general AI assistants,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024, OpenReview.net, 2024

    2024

  51. [60]

    Appworld: A controllable world of apps and people for benchmarking interactive coding agents,

    H. Trivedi, T. Khot, M. Hartmann, R. Manku, V . Dong, E. Li, S. Gupta, A. Sabharwal, and N. Balasubramanian, “Appworld: A controllable world of apps and people for benchmarking interactive coding agents,” in Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa...

    2024

  52. [61]

    �-bench: A benchmark for tool-agent-user interaction in real-world domains,

    S. Yao, N. Shinn, P. Razavi, and K. Narasimhan, “ �-bench: A benchmark for tool-agent-user interaction in real-world domains,” CoRR, vol. abs/2406.12045, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Preference leakage: A contamination problem in llm-as-a-judge,

    D. Li, R. Sun, Y . Huang, M. Zhong, B. Jiang, J. Han, X. Zhang, W. Wang, and H. Liu, “Preference leakage: A contamination problem in llm-as-a-judge,” 2025

    2025

  54. [63]

    Accessed: 2025-07-28

    xAI, “Grok 4.” https://x �ai/news/grok-4, July 2025. Accessed: 2025-07-28

    2025

  55. [64]

    Introducing claude 4

    Anthropic, “Introducing claude 4.” https://www �anthropic�com/news/claude-4, May 2025. Accessed: 2025-07-28

    2025

  56. [65]

    Claude 3.7 sonnet and claude code

    Anthropic, “Claude 3.7 sonnet and claude code.” https://www �anthropic�com/news/claude-3-7-sonnet, Feb 2025. Accessed: 2025-07-28

    2025

  57. [66]

    Introducing gpt-5

    OpenAI, “Introducing gpt-5.” https://openai �com/index/introducing-gpt-5/, August 2025. Accessed: 2025-08-14

    2025

  58. [67]

    Introducing openai o3 and o4-mini

    OpenAI, “Introducing openai o3 and o4-mini.” https://openai�com/index/introducing-o3-and-o4-mini/, April 2025. Accessed: 2025-07-28

    2025

  59. [68]

    Introducing gpt-4.1 in the api

    OpenAI, “Introducing gpt-4.1 in the api.” https://openai �com/index/gpt-4-1/, April 2025. Accessed: 2025-07-28

    2025

  60. [69]

    Introducing gpt-oss

    OpenAI, “Introducing gpt-oss.” https://openai �com/index/introducing-gpt-oss/, August 2025. Accessed: 2025-08-14

    2025

  61. [70]

    Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities,

    G. Comanici, E. Bieber, M. Schaekermann, I. Pasupat, N. Sachdeva, I. Dhillon, M. Blistein, O. Ram, D. Zhang, E. Rosen, L. Marris, S. Petulla, C. Gaffney, A. Aharoni, N. Lintz, T. C. Pais, H. Jacobsson, I. Szpektor, N.-J. Jiang, K. Haridasan, A. Omran, N. Saunshi, D. Bahri, G. ...

    2025

  62. [71]

    Glm-4.5: Reasoning, coding, and agentic abililties

    Zai, “Glm-4.5: Reasoning, coding, and agentic abililties.” https://z �ai/blog/glm-4�5, July 2025. Accessed: 2025-07-28

    2025

  63. [72]

    Kimi k2: Open agentic intelligence

    Moonshot, “Kimi k2: Open agentic intelligence.” https://moonshotai �github�io/Kimi-K2/, July 2025. Accessed: 2025-07-28

    2025

  64. [73]

    Qwen3 technical report,

    A. Yang, A. Li, B. Yang, B. Zhang, B. Hui, B. Zheng, B. Yu, C. Gao, C. Huang, C. Lv, C. Zheng, D. Liu, F. Zhou, F. Huang, F. Hu, H. Ge, H. Wei, H. Lin, J. Tang, J. Yang, J. Tu, J. Zhang, J. Yang, J. Yang, J. Zhou, J. Zhou, J. Lin, K. Dang, K. Bao, K. Yang, L. Yu, L. Deng, M. L...

    2025

  65. [74]

    Deepseek-v3 technical report,

    DeepSeek-AI, A. Liu, B. Feng, B. Xue, B. Wang, B. Wu, C. Lu, C. Zhao, C. Deng, C. Zhang, C. Ruan, D. Dai, D. Guo, D. Yang, D. Chen, D. Ji, E. Li, F. Lin, F. Dai, F. Luo, G. Hao, G. Chen, G. Li, H. Zhang, H. Bao, H. Xu, H. Wang, H. Zhang, H. Ding, H. Xin, H. Gao, H. Li, H. Qu, ...

    2025

  66. [75]

    Chatbot arena: An open platform for evaluating llms by human preference,

    W. Chiang, L. Zheng, Y . Sheng, A. N. Angelopoulos, T. Li, D. Li, B. Zhu, H. Zhang, M. I. Jordan, J. E. Gonzalez, and I. Stoica, “Chatbot arena: An open platform for evaluating llms by human preference,” inForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vi...

    2024

  67. [2024]

    Accessed: 2025-06-30

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.