Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Longitudinal Distance: Towards Accountable Instance Attribution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.10437 v1 pith:TY45MLJT submitted 2021-08-23 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords agentinstancesaccountableapproachesattributioncase-basedcategorizeddecision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Previous research in interpretable machine learning (IML) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) can be broadly categorized as either focusing on seeking interpretability in the agent's model (i.e., IML) or focusing on the context of the user in addition to the model (i.e., XAI). The former can be categorized as feature or instance attribution. Example- or sample-based methods such as those using or inspired by case-based reasoning (CBR) rely on various approaches to select instances that are not necessarily attributing instances responsible for an agent's decision. Furthermore, existing approaches have focused on interpretability and explainability but fall short when it comes to accountability. Inspired in case-based reasoning principles, this paper introduces a pseudo-metric we call Longitudinal distance and its use to attribute instances to a neural network agent's decision that can be potentially used to build accountable CBR agents.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools