Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

On the space of U(N) scattering amplitudes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper identifies a previously overlooked, parameter-free integrable scattering amplitude for U(N) theories and shows it lies on the boundary of the space of all consistent no-bound-state amplitudes.

desk verdict Solid U(N) bootstrap extension with a credible new integrable amplitude, but the novelty claim for class VII depends on an unproven completeness assertion that a referee should check. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.20239 v1 pith:U2ZN65PQ submitted 2025-04-28 hep-th

Lucía Cordova , Ricardo Rodrigues This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th PACS 11.55.Ds11.80.-m
keywords S-matrixbootstrapU(N)symmetrytwo-dimensionalquantumfieldtheoryYang-Baxterequationsintegrableno-bound-stateamplitudescrossingwalkingcentralcharge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper maps the space of consistent two-to-two scattering amplitudes for massive two-dimensional quantum field theories with a global U(N) symmetry and no bound states. Using primal and dual bootstrap methods, it bounds that space at the crossing-symmetric point and finds a convex allowed region whose boundary is populated by exactly solvable amplitudes: free theory, massive $CP^{N-1}$-type models, the O(2N) nonlinear $\sigma$ model, periodic Yang-Baxter amplitudes, and two constant solutions. The central new result is a previously overlooked, parameter-free solution of the Yang-Baxter equations, class VII, with only backward-scattering components and $u_1=t_1=u_2=t_2=0$, whose $r_1(\theta)=\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}} f_{1-ik/\mu}(\theta)/f_{ik/\mu}(\theta)$ is periodic in rapidity when $\cosh(\pi\mu)=N/2$. The paper also identifies an O(2N)-symmetric subregion of the U(N) space and shows that the periodic integrable amplitudes produce walking central charges, $c\approx1$ for classes V and VI and $c\approx2$ for class VII.

What carries the argument

The machinery has two parts. On the bootstrap side, the S-matrix is written in six U(N)-invariant functions, $u_1,u_2,t_1,t_2,r_1,r_2$, and repacked into four unitarity eigenchannels ($S_{\mathrm{sing}\pm},S_{\mathrm{adj}\pm},S_{\mathrm{sym}},S_{\mathrm{anti}}$) related by a crossing matrix $C$ with $C^2=1$; an optimized dual functional bounds any physical amplitude at $s=2m^2$, and matching primal and dual results locates the boundary of the allowed region. On the integrable side, the load-bearing object is the gamma-function building block $f_\lambda(\theta)$ and the infinite product $r_1(\theta)=\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}} f_{1-ik/\mu}(\theta)/f_{ik/\mu}(\theta)$, which solves the unitarity constraints and becomes periodic in real rapidity when the parameter $\mu$ satisfies $\cosh(\pi\mu)=N/2$, the defining condition of class VII.

What would settle it

Substitute the class VII functions into the two factorization equations dismissed as redundant in footnote 11; if the residual does not vanish for generic rapidities, class VII is not integrable and the classification is incomplete. The same test applied to all table-1 entries would settle whether the set of equations in appendix A is complete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the space of U(N)-symmetric, no-bound-state $2\to2$ amplitudes is convex and bounded, and that every minimal integrable amplitude without bound-state poles appears on its boundary; class IV is the exception because its transmission amplitude vanishes at the crossing-symmetric point. It further claims that the original classification of factorized U(N) S-matrices is incomplete in two ways: it misses a one-parameter family of solutions for $N=2$, and it misses a fully parameter-free solution valid for any $N$, class VII. In class VII the transmission amplitudes vanish, $u_1=t_1=u_2=t_2=0$, and the only nontrivial input is $r_1(\theta)=\prod_{k\in\mathbb{Z}} f_{1-ik/\mu}(\theta)/f_{ik/\mu}(\theta)$ with $\cosh(\pi\mu)=N/2$, related to $r_2$ by crossing; the amplitude is periodic in real rapidity with period $2\pi/\mu$. If this classification is complete, table 1 is the corrected catalog of integrable U(N) amplitudes without bound states, and class VII is a genuine new entry in that catalog.

Load-bearing premise

Everything in table 1, including the novelty of class VII, rests on the unproved claim that the Yang-Baxter equations written in appendix A plus the N=2 equations capture all independent factorization constraints, since footnote 11 declares two other factorization types redundant without proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every consistent U(N) no-bound-state theory must lie inside the convex monolith, so any amplitude outside the plotted regions is excluded by analyticity, crossing, and unitarity.
  • The integrable amplitudes of classes I, II, III, V, VI and VII, together with the two constant solutions, saturate the bootstrap bounds and therefore are extremal points of the allowed space.
  • For $N=2$ there is a continuous one-parameter line of integrable amplitudes interpolating between class II at $p\to1$ and class III at $p\to\infty$, so the boundary of the $U(2)$ space contains a whole solvable curve, not just isolated points.
  • The periodic integrable amplitudes V, VI and VII give walking two-particle central charges, around $c\approx1$ for classes V and VI and $c\approx2$ for class VII, indicating a long approximately conformal regime and suggesting complex conformal field theories.
  • Class VII is a new parameter-free entry in the integrable S-matrix catalog; its absence from the earlier classification means that catalog was incomplete.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the appendix-A equation set is complete, class VII should be a vertex of the monolith for every $N$, not just a boundary point; this can be checked numerically by increasing the grid and precision parameters and looking for a sharp corner at the class-VII location.
  • Because classes V, VI and VII share the same infinite-product structure for $r_1(\theta)$ and differ only in which transmission components vanish and in the condition on $\mu$, one could search for parameter-dependent deformations that interpolate between them; the paper does not perform such a search.
  • The walking central charge near $c=2$ for class VII, together with the paper's speculative map to loop models, suggests a concrete test: a lattice or spin-chain realization of the U(N) loop model at $N=2$ with fundamental excitations liberated should show a walking regime at $c=2$ rather than $c=1$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the space of 2→2 scattering amplitudes of massive two-dimensional quantum field theories with global U(N) symmetry and no bound states. Using the S-matrix bootstrap, the authors compute allowed regions in the space of amplitudes at the crossing-symmetric point, finding that integrable models sit at boundary points. The main classification result is a revised set of integrable U(N) amplitudes (Table 1), correcting classes V and VI of the old classification and adding a new class VII with u1=t1=u2=t2=0 and r1(θ)=∏_{k∈Z} f_{1-ik/μ}(θ)/f_{ik/μ}(θ), cosh(πμ)=N/2, plus the previously known N=2 one-parameter family. The paper also identifies an O(2N)-symmetric subregion of the monolith, studies the analytic structure of generic extremal amplitudes (resonances and periodicity), and computes two-particle central charge contributions for the periodic classes, observing walking behavior near c=1 and c=2.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes several useful contributions. It provides a numerical map of the U(N) amplitude space with both primal and dual implementations (Appendix C), a corrected and extended Yang-Baxter classification with an explicit derivation in Appendix A, and a non-trivial consistency check with the O(2N) monolith. The new class VII is a concrete, parameter-free candidate integrable amplitude that can be tested by direct substitution into the Yang-Baxter equations and by bootstrap geometry. The walking central charge analysis connects the periodic amplitudes to complex CFTs and loop models, generating falsifiable predictions (e.g., plateau values c=2 for class VII). The paper is careful in presenting numerical convergence evidence (vanishing duality gap) and openly discusses the limitations of the extremal amplitudes (particle production, finite precision).

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, footnote 11, Eqs. (A.1)-(A.9)] The completeness of the Yang-Baxter equation set is load-bearing for the classification in Table 1, including the new class VII. The paper states in footnote 11 that two additional factorization types are redundant 'as such do not place further constraints', but the verification is not shown. If those omitted equations are not actually implied by (A.2)-(A.9), the N→N/2 condition (A.52) could be an artifact of solving only a subset of constraints, and other solutions could be missed. Please include the explicit reduction of the two omitted factorization types (or a citation where this is proven), or state that each class in Table 1 has been directly checked against them.
  2. [Section 4, Table 1, footnote 4] The claim that class VII is 'previously overlooked' is supported only by 'to our knowledge'. Since equivalent Yang-Baxter solutions can appear in different gauge or crossing frames, please add a comparison with known U(N)/SU(N) R-matrix classifications (e.g., trigonometric R-matrices) and demonstrate that no relabeling maps class VII to class V or VI, for instance by listing the representation-channel eigenvalues S_sym, S_anti, S_sing±, S_adj± and their N-dependence. The condition cosh(πμ)=N/2 is distinct from (A.44), but a systematic statement would settle the point.
  3. [Appendix A.1, Eqs. (A.51)-(A.52)] The derivation of class VII is compressed into three sentences. Please write out the reduced Yang-Baxter equation obtained from (A.9) when u1=t1=u2=t2=0 and show explicitly how the ratio a(θ)=r2/r1 satisfies (A.42) with N→N/2, so that the fixing cosh(πμ)=N/2 can be verified without reconstructing the index contractions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.1] There is a duplicated word in 'In this work we we used both methods'; please correct this and any similar typos.
  2. [Table 1] The caption says classes I-VII are 'valid for any N', but for class VII the condition cosh(πμ)=N/2 gives μ=0 when N=2, where the product formula for r1(θ) is singular; please specify the range of N (e.g., N>2) or explain the limiting sense in which the solution is defined for N=2.
  3. [Eq. (3.3)] The constant solutions are presented as bare vectors; please state explicitly that their entries correspond to (S_sing+, S_adj+, S_sing-, S_adj-, S_sym, S_anti) as ordered in (2.16).
  4. [Abstract and Section 1] The bounds are called 'rigorous', but the dual implementation uses finite truncation n_max, Chebyshev quadrature, and finite-precision MOSEK. Please qualify the statement to indicate that the bounds are rigorous in the dual sense up to the numerical accuracy of the implementation, so as not to overclaim.
  5. [References [27] and [28]] Reference [27] has an incomplete bibliographic entry; please supply the full publication details or a preprint number.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the U(N) bounds and class VII are derived from bootstrap and Yang-Baxter equations, with self-citations only methodological.

full rationale

The central bootstrap bounds follow from optimizing primal/dual functionals subject to analyticity, crossing, and unitarity; no parameter is fitted to the boundary points that are then quoted as predictions. The integrable amplitudes in table 1, including class VII, are obtained by solving the Yang-Baxter equations (A.1)-(A.9): class VII is derived by setting u1=t1=u2=t2=0 and relating r2 to r1 via crossing, with the YB equations fixing cosh(pi mu)=N/2 and unitarity fixing r1(theta)=prod_k f_{1-ik/mu}(theta)/f_{ik/mu}(theta). This is an independent algebraic branch, not a renamed fit. The O(2N) section is presented as a consistency check against the independent O(2N) results of [5], and the walking central charges are computed from the amplitudes via the c-sum rule, not used to fix constants. The self-citations [5] and [15] supply the dual-bootstrap formalism and form-factor kernels; these are established tools whose content does not include the U(N) results claimed here. Two caveats are stated in the manuscript itself: footnote 11 says two factorization types were checked but gives no proof of redundancy, and the novelty of class VII is asserted only 'to our knowledge'. These are completeness and novelty risks, not circularity, because no derived quantity reduces to an input by construction in the quoted derivations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard bootstrap axioms (analyticity, unitarity, crossing), a completeness assumption for the Yang-Baxter equations, and the minimality choice for integrable solutions. No physical free parameters are fitted to data; the N=2 family parameter p is carried from prior literature. No new entities are posited.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption S-matrix analyticity with only branch cuts (no bound-state poles)
    Stated in section 2.1 as an assumption; defines the space being bootstrapped.
  • domain assumption Unitarity |S_a(theta)|^2 <= 1 on the real physical line
    Equation (2.18); standard bootstrap axiom.
  • domain assumption Crossing symmetry via the C matrix (2.15)
    Imposed by (2.15)-(2.17); standard consequence of analyticity.
  • ad hoc to paper Completeness of the Yang-Baxter equation set (A.1)-(A.9) and the N=2 equations (A.53)-(A.57)
    Footnote 11 asserts two other factorization types are redundant without proof; the classification of table 1 relies on this completeness.
  • ad hoc to paper Minimality (no CDD factors, no poles in the physical strip)
    Section A.1: solutions are selected as 'minimal' with minimal zeros/poles and no bound-state poles; this picks one representative per Yang-Baxter class.
  • standard math Zamolodchikov c-theorem sum rule and Watson's equation for form factors
    Appendix B uses these to compute c2; standard results in integrable QFT.
  • domain assumption Two-particle contribution dominates the UV central charge in the walking region
    Section 4 and appendix B compute only c2 and truncate the sum rule at theta_max; the claim of walking behavior assumes this captures the relevant flow.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the space of U(N) scattering amplitudes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U2ZN65PQ

@misc{pith2026250420239,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the space of U(N) scattering amplitudes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U2ZN65PQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.20239}
}
abstract

We investigate the space of massive two-dimensional theories with a global U(N) symmetry and no bound states. Following S-matrix bootstrap principles, we establish rigorous bounds on the space of consistent $2 \rightarrow 2$ scattering amplitudes. The allowed regions exhibit rich geometric features with integrable models appearing at special points along the boundary. Generic extremal amplitudes display an infinite number of resonances and periodic behavior in energy, similar to previous studies with other group-like symmetries. Within the allowed space, we identify a subregion where the symmetry is enhanced to O(2N), establishing a connection with earlier studies. We also revisit the classification of integrable solutions, identifying one that was previously overlooked in the literature. Finally, we examine the walking behavior of the central charge associated with several of these periodic amplitudes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cross-Section Bootstrap: Unveiling the Froissart Amplitude

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A universal finite-energy upper bound on the integrated cross-section for identical scalars is derived; the conjectured saturating "Froissart amplitude" shows Regge trajectories, a rising cross-section, and annulus-li...

  2. Bootstrapping Gravity with Crossing Symmetric Dispersion Relations

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A crossing-symmetric dispersion-relation bootstrap reproduces known gravitational EFT bounds and gives new tree-level limits on the graviton coupling to a massive spin-4 state.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [11]

    B. Berg, M. Karowski, P. Weisz and V. Kurak, Factorized U(n) Symmetric s Matrices in Two-Dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 134 (1978) 125

    work page 1978

  2. [1]

    Paulos, J

    M.F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B.C. van Rees and P. Vieira, The S-matrix bootstrap. Part I: QFT in AdS , JHEP 11 (2017) 133 [ 1607.06109]

    arXiv 2017

  3. [2]

    Paulos, J

    M.F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B.C. van Rees and P. Vieira, The S-matrix bootstrap II: two dimensional amplitudes , JHEP 11 (2017) 143 [ 1607.06110]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [3]

    Y. He, A. Irrgang and M. Kruczenski, A note on the S-matrix bootstrap for the 2d O(N) bosonic model, JHEP 11 (2018) 093 [ 1805.02812]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [4]

    C´ ordova and P

    L. C´ ordova and P. Vieira,Adding flavour to the S-matrix bootstrap , JHEP 12 (2018) 063 [1805.11143]

    arXiv 2018

  6. [5]

    C´ ordova, Y

    L. C´ ordova, Y. He, M. Kruczenski and P. Vieira,The O(N) S-matrix Monolith , JHEP 04 (2020) 142 [ 1909.06495]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [6]

    Bercini, M

    C. Bercini, M. Fabri, A. Homrich and P. Vieira, S-matrix bootstrap: Supersymmetry, Z2, and Z4 symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 045022 [ 1909.06453]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [7]

    Homrich, J.a

    A. Homrich, J.a. Penedones, J. Toledo, B.C. van Rees and P. Vieira, The S-matrix Bootstrap IV: Multiple Amplitudes , JHEP 11 (2019) 076 [ 1905.06905]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 39 references
  1. [8]

    Copetti, L

    C. Copetti, L. Cordova and S. Komatsu, S-matrix bootstrap and non-invertible symmetries , JHEP 03 (2025) 204 [ 2408.13132]

    2025 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Paulos and Z

    M.F. Paulos and Z. Zheng, Bounding scattering of charged particles in 1 + 1 dimensions, JHEP 05 (2020) 145 [ 1805.11429]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Basso and A

    B. Basso and A. Rej, On the integrability of two-dimensional models with U(1)xSU(N) symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 866 (2013) 337 [ 1207.0413]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Hogervorst and S

    M. Hogervorst and S. Rychkov, Radial Coordinates for Conformal Blocks , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 106004 [ 1303.1111]

    2013 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Paulos, J

    M.F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B.C. van Rees and P. Vieira, The S-matrix bootstrap. Part III: higher dimensional amplitudes , JHEP 12 (2019) 040 [ 1708.06765]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Correia, J

    M. Correia, J. Penedones and A. Vuignier, Injecting the UV into the bootstrap: Ising Field Theory, JHEP 08 (2023) 108 [ 2212.03917]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Cordova, M

    L. Cordova, M. Correia, A. Georgoudis and A. Vuignier, The O(N) monolith reloaded: sum rules and Form Factor Bootstrap , JHEP 01 (2024) 093 [ 2311.03031]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Guerrieri, A

    A.L. Guerrieri, A. Homrich and P. Vieira, Dual S-matrix bootstrap. Part I. 2D theory , JHEP 11 (2020) 084 [ 2008.02770]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Kruczenski and H

    M. Kruczenski and H. Murali, The R-matrix bootstrap for the 2d O(N) bosonic model with a boundary, JHEP 04 (2021) 097 [ 2012.15576]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    He and M

    Y. He and M. Kruczenski, S-matrix bootstrap in 3+1 dimensions: regularization and dual convex problem, JHEP 08 (2021) 125 [ 2103.11484]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Guerrieri and A

    A. Guerrieri and A. Sever, Rigorous Bounds on the Analytic S Matrix , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 251601 [ 2106.10257]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Guerrieri, A

    A. Guerrieri, A. Homrich and P. Vieira, Multiparticle Flux-Tube S-matrix Bootstrap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 041601 [ 2404.10812]. – 34 –

    2025 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Wiegmann, EXACT SOLUTION OF THE O(3) NONLINEAR SIGMA MODEL , Phys

    P.B. Wiegmann, EXACT SOLUTION OF THE O(3) NONLINEAR SIGMA MODEL , Phys. Lett. B 152 (1985) 209

    1985

  14. [23]

    Polyakov and P.B

    A.M. Polyakov and P.B. Wiegmann, Theory of Nonabelian Goldstone Bosons , Phys. Lett. B 131 (1983) 121

    1983

  15. [24]

    D’Adda, P

    A. D’Adda, P. Di Vecchia and M. Luscher, Confinement and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in CP**n-1 Models with Quarks , Nucl. Phys. B 152 (1979) 125

    1979

  16. [25]

    Abdalla, M.C.B

    E. Abdalla, M.C.B. Abdalla and M. Gomes, Anomaly Cancellations in the Supersymmetric CP(N −1) Model, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 452

    1982

  17. [26]

    Abdalla and M

    E. Abdalla and M. Forger, Integrable Nonlinearσ Models With Fermions, Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 123

    1986

  18. [27]

    Koberle and V

    R. Koberle and V. Kurak, LIBERATION OF U(N) SOLITONS IN THE CP**(N-1) MODEL BY MASSLESS QUARKS ,

  19. [28]

    Koberle and V

    R. Koberle and V. Kurak, Deconfinement in the CP( 1N) Model by Massless Fermions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 627

    1987

  20. [29]

    Zamolodchikov and A.B

    A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Factorized s Matrices in Two-Dimensions as the Exact Solutions of Certain Relativistic Quantum Field Models , Annals Phys. 120 (1979) 253

    1979

  21. [30]

    Antunes, M.S

    A. Antunes, M.S. Costa and J. Pereira, Exploring inelasticity in the S-matrix Bootstrap , Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 138225 [ 2301.13219]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Copetti, L

    C. Copetti, L. Cordova and S. Komatsu, Noninvertible Symmetries, Anomalies, and Scattering Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 181601 [ 2403.04835]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Hortacsu, B

    M. Hortacsu, B. Schroer and H.J. Thun, A Two-dimensional σ Model With Particle Production, Nucl. Phys. B 154 (1979) 120

    1979

  24. [33]

    Gorbenko and B

    V. Gorbenko and B. Zan, Two-dimensional O(n) models and logarithmic CFTs , JHEP 10 (2020) 099 [ 2005.07708]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Domany, D

    E. Domany, D. Mukamel, B. Nienhuis and A. Schwimmer, Duality Relations and Equivalences for Models With O(N) and Cubic Symmetry , Nucl. Phys. B 190 (1981) 279

    1981

  26. [35]

    Zamolodchikov, Exact S matrix associated with selfavoiding polymer problem in two-dimensions, Mod

    A.B. Zamolodchikov, Exact S matrix associated with selfavoiding polymer problem in two-dimensions, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 (1991) 1807

    1991

  27. [36]

    Roux, J.L

    P. Roux, J.L. Jacobsen, S. Ribault and H. Saleur, Critical spin chains and loop models with PSU (n) symmetry, SciPost Phys. 18 (2025) 033 [ 2404.01935]

    2025 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Mussardo, Statistical field theory: an introduction to exactly solved models in statistical physics, Oxford Univ

    G. Mussardo, Statistical field theory: an introduction to exactly solved models in statistical physics, Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY (2010)

    2010

  29. [38]

    Zamolodchikov, Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory, JETP Lett

    A.B. Zamolodchikov, Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory, JETP Lett. 43 (1986) 730

    1986

  30. [39]

    Watson, Some general relations between the photoproduction and scattering of pi mesons, Phys

    K.M. Watson, Some general relations between the photoproduction and scattering of pi mesons, Phys. Rev. 95 (1954) 228

    1954

  31. [40]

    Smirnov, Form-factors in completely integrable models of quantum field theory , vol

    F.A. Smirnov, Form-factors in completely integrable models of quantum field theory , vol. 14 (1992). – 35 –

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.