pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15686 · v1 · pith:U3CWA4R4new · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · gr-qc

Disformal Kerr Imprints on BHL Accretion: Shock Morphology, PSD Signatures, and Observational QPO Counterparts

Orhan Donmez , M. Yousaf , Imtiaz Khan , G. Mustafa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 17:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE gr-qc
keywords disformal KerrBHL accretionshock morphologyQPOspower spectral densityGRS 1915+105modified gravityaccretion oscillations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Disformal deviations from Kerr modify shock structures in accretion flows and generate QPO frequencies matching observations in GRS 1915+105.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies the effects of disformal modifications to the slowly rotating Kerr black hole on the morphology and timing properties of Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretion. It shows that even weak deviations alter the shock-cone structure, raise the density behind the shock, and create coherent oscillations in the accretion rate. The pure Kerr simulation produces distinct peaks at 42.99 Hz and 68.13 Hz that correspond to the high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations observed in the black hole system GRS 1915+105. Models with small deviations from Kerr yield low-frequency QPOs within the range seen in other Galactic binaries, while larger deviations produce irregular, broad-band signals with multiple peaks. Using inverse-mass scaling, the calculated frequencies also align with observations from intermediate-mass and supermassive black holes such as M82 X-1, NGC 5408 X-1, and RE J1034+396, which in turn helps estimate possible mass ranges for these objects.

Core claim

Simulations of BHL accretion onto disformal Kerr black holes demonstrate that deviations from the Kerr solution, even when weak, modify the shock-cone structure, enhance density in the post-shock region, and produce coherent oscillations in the accretion rate. The Kerr model specifically yields coherent peaks at 42.99 Hz and 68.13 Hz consistent with high-frequency QPOs from GRS 1915+105, weak deviations produce low-frequency QPOs matching Galactic black-hole binaries, and large deviations explain more irregular observational results. Inverse-mass scaling further allows these frequencies to be compared with observations of intermediate-mass and supermassive black holes, enabling inference of黑

What carries the argument

The disformal Kerr metric parameters applied to ideal hydrodynamic flows in the BHL accretion setup, which control the resulting shock morphology and the power spectral density signatures of accretion rate variations.

If this is right

  • Even weak disformal deviations from Kerr lead to low-frequency coherent QPOs consistent with observations in Galactic black-hole binaries.
  • Large deviations from the Kerr solution can account for irregular, broad-band QPO signals containing multiple peaks.
  • Inverse-mass scaling of the simulated frequencies permits comparison with observational data from intermediate-mass and supermassive black holes.
  • The consistency with sources like M82 X-1, NGC 5408 X-1, and RE J1034+396 allows inference of possible black-hole mass ranges for those objects.
  • BHL accretion in disformal Kerr geometry provides a framework for linking modified-gravity black-hole spacetimes with observable QPO phenomenology.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If these frequency shifts are confirmed, timing data from X-ray binaries could place bounds on disformal parameters in alternative gravity theories.
  • Extending the simulations to include magnetic fields or viscosity might reveal how robust the coherent oscillations remain under more realistic conditions.
  • The mass estimation technique could be applied to additional sources to test for systematic differences between Kerr and modified metrics.
  • Future observations with higher sensitivity could distinguish between weak and strong deviation models based on the coherence and bandwidth of QPO signals.

Load-bearing premise

The ideal hydrodynamic Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretion model without magnetic fields, radiation pressure, or viscosity, using the specific disformal Kerr metric, faithfully represents actual black hole accretion flows, and the inverse-mass scaling accurately extrapolates frequencies between stellar-mass and supermassive black holes.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement of the power spectrum of accretion rate variations in GRS 1915+105 showing no peaks near 43 Hz or 68 Hz, or a mismatch between scaled frequencies and observed QPOs in M82 X-1, would falsify the reported correspondences.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15686 by G. Mustafa, Imtiaz Khan, M. Yousaf, Orhan Donmez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Time evolution of the rest-mass density distributio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. One-dimensional azimuthal profiles of the rest-mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Time-dependent azimuthal variation of the rest-mas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Time evolution of the mass accretion rates calculate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. PSD spectra and multi-component Lorentzian fits calc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. It is the same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We reveal the effect of the spacetime parameters on the accretion morphology formed through the BHL mechanism around a slowly rotating disformal Kerr black hole. Thus, we investigate the measurable signatures of these parameters on the hydrodynamical morphology and the timing behavior of the accreting flow. It is shown that even weak disformal deviations from the Kerr solution modify the shock-cone structure, enhance the density in the post-shock region, and produce coherent oscillations in the accretion rate. The Kerr model produces coherent peaks at 42.99 Hz and 68.13 Hz, and these frequencies are consistent with the high-frequency QPOs observed from the source GRS 1915+105. In the models where the deviations from the Kerr solution are weak, low-frequency QPOs are produced and found to be coherent. These frequencies also fall within the frequency range observed in Galactic black-hole binaries. On the other hand, the models with large deviations from Kerr can be used to explain observational results that are more irregular, broad-band, and contain multiple peaks. In addition, by using inverse-mass scaling in this work, the numerically calculated frequencies are also compared with observations of intermediate-mass and supermassive black holes. In particular, the disformal black-hole models are found to be consistent with the observational results obtained from the sources M82 X-1, NGC 5408 X-1, and RE J1034+396. This comparison also allows the possible black-hole mass range of observed sources to be inferred from the relation between simulated and observed frequencies. This makes BHL accretion in disformal Kerr geometry a powerful framework for connecting modified-gravity black-hole spacetimes with observable QPO phenomenology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents numerical hydrodynamical simulations of Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretion onto slowly rotating disformal Kerr black holes. It claims that even weak disformal deviations modify the shock-cone structure, enhance post-shock density, and generate coherent oscillations in the accretion rate. The Kerr case yields peaks at 42.99 Hz and 68.13 Hz stated to match high-frequency QPOs in GRS 1915+105; weak deviations produce low-frequency QPOs consistent with Galactic black-hole binaries, while larger deviations yield irregular broad-band features. Inverse-mass scaling is used to compare results with intermediate-mass and supermassive sources including M82 X-1, NGC 5408 X-1, and RE J1034+396, allowing inference of black-hole mass ranges.

Significance. If the results and scaling hold, the work provides a concrete framework linking modified-gravity black-hole spacetimes to observable QPO phenomenology via direct simulation of accretion morphology and timing signatures. The use of numerical integration to extract PSD features and shock structures in disformal Kerr geometry is a technical strength that enables falsifiable predictions. Significance is reduced by the absence of demonstrated numerical convergence and by the unverified extrapolation of the inverse-mass scaling to the disformal case.

major comments (2)
  1. The inverse-mass scaling is applied directly from the Kerr limit to disformal models without re-derivation or explicit numerical check that frequencies transform exactly as 1/M when black-hole mass is varied at fixed disformal parameter. This is load-bearing for the claimed consistency with M82 X-1, NGC 5408 X-1, and RE J1034+396, because the disformal coupling introduces an additional scale that may alter the mass dependence of epicyclic frequencies and effective potentials.
  2. Specific frequencies (42.99 Hz and 68.13 Hz for Kerr; additional values for disformal cases) are reported in the abstract and results, yet the manuscript provides no information on grid resolution, convergence tests, or error estimates. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the coherent peaks and morphology changes are robust against numerical artifacts.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the procedure used to select the disformal-parameter values; if they were chosen so that resulting frequencies fall inside observed ranges, this selection criterion should be stated explicitly.
  2. A summary table listing simulated frequencies, disformal-parameter values, and corresponding observational sources would improve readability of the multi-source comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments in detail below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to enhance its clarity and scientific rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The inverse-mass scaling is applied directly from the Kerr limit to disformal models without re-derivation or explicit numerical check that frequencies transform exactly as 1/M when black-hole mass is varied at fixed disformal parameter. This is load-bearing for the claimed consistency with M82 X-1, NGC 5408 X-1, and RE J1034+396, because the disformal coupling introduces an additional scale that may alter the mass dependence of epicyclic frequencies and effective potentials.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's concern regarding the mass scaling in the disformal case. The disformal Kerr metric is constructed such that the disformal parameter is a dimensionless quantity when expressed in units of the black hole mass, preserving the inverse-mass scaling of the dynamical frequencies as in the standard Kerr spacetime. This is because the effective potential and epicyclic frequencies derive from the metric components that scale homogeneously with M. However, we agree that making this explicit strengthens the paper. In the revised version, we have added a paragraph deriving the scaling from the metric form and noted that the additional scale is absorbed into the dimensionless disformal parameter. These changes support the observational comparisons. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Specific frequencies (42.99 Hz and 68.13 Hz for Kerr; additional values for disformal cases) are reported in the abstract and results, yet the manuscript provides no information on grid resolution, convergence tests, or error estimates. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the coherent peaks and morphology changes are robust against numerical artifacts.

    Authors: We fully agree that numerical convergence and resolution details are crucial for validating the reported frequencies and morphological features. The omission in the original submission was an oversight. We have now added a new subsection to the methods section detailing the computational grid setup, the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy condition, and convergence tests where results at different resolutions are compared to verify the stability of the PSD peaks and shock morphology. Error estimates on the frequencies are now included based on the variability in the simulations. This revision addresses the concern and demonstrates the robustness of our findings. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Numerical hydrodynamics yields independent morphology and frequency results; inverse-mass scaling is an external comparison tool

full rationale

The paper's core claims rest on direct numerical integration of the ideal hydrodynamic equations in the disformal Kerr spacetime, from which shock-cone modifications, post-shock density enhancements, and accretion-rate time series (and their PSD peaks at specific frequencies such as 42.99 Hz and 68.13 Hz) are extracted. These outputs are then compared to observations via the conventional inverse-mass scaling relation. No equation or step reduces a reported prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors. The exploration of different disformal deviation strengths is presented as a parameter study rather than a fit that forces the reported consistencies.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on the disformal parameter as a tunable quantity varied to reproduce observed QPO bands, plus standard assumptions of ideal hydrodynamics on a fixed modified metric and the applicability of simple frequency-mass scaling across source classes.

free parameters (1)
  • disformal parameter
    Strength of deviation from Kerr metric; models with weak and large values are run to produce different QPO behaviors and coherence properties.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Accretion flow obeys ideal hydrodynamic equations on the disformal Kerr background without magnetic fields or radiative cooling
    Invoked to justify the BHL shock-cone morphology and oscillation results in the simulations.
  • domain assumption Observed QPO frequencies scale inversely with black-hole mass across stellar, intermediate, and supermassive regimes
    Used to compare simulated frequencies directly with data from GRS 1915+105, M82 X-1, NGC 5408 X-1, and RE J1034+396.
invented entities (1)
  • disformal Kerr black hole no independent evidence
    purpose: Spacetime solution incorporating a disformal transformation of the Kerr metric to encode modified-gravity effects
    Introduced as the background geometry whose parameter controls the reported changes in shock structure and accretion-rate oscillations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5863 in / 1873 out tokens · 102842 ms · 2026-05-20T17:18:21.276017+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The cone-like structure alternates between a compact dow n- stream configuration and a broader, curved, spiral-like pat tern. On the other hand, from the velocity vector plots, it is seen tha t the matter in the post-shock region is not only transported away , but also rotates around the black hole or is redirected toward th e black hole. This behavior sho...

    work page

  2. [2]

    While the strongest low-frequency structure appears at

    13 Hz. While the strongest low-frequency structure appears at

    work page

  3. [3]

    99 Hz and 68

    43 Hz, the peaks at 42 . 99 Hz and 68 . 13 Hz have the largest Q values. This shows that these peaks with larger Q values are nar- rower and more coherent oscillatory components. These resu lts are consistent with the behavior of the mass accretion rate disc ussed in Fig. 7, which is almost steady but weakly oscillatory. In the Kerr model, the resulting s...

    work page

  4. [4]

    96 Hz component

    62 Hz component is larger than that of the 2 . 96 Hz component. This shows that 6 . 62 Hz is a more coherent oscillation mode. Al- though the peak at 27. 25 Hz is seen to be very narrow and coherent, its power is much lower compared with the 2 . 96 Hz and 6 . 62 Hz peaks, which significantly reduces its observability. Comp ared with the Kerr solution, it i...

    work page

  5. [5]

    82 Hz, 18

    86 Hz, 7. 82 Hz, 18. 89 Hz, and 22. 94 Hz. While the strongest fea- ture is formed at the low frequency of 3. 86 Hz, the higher-frequency peaks with lower power, especially at 18 . 89 Hz and 22. 94 Hz, have very large Q values. Although these peaks are very narrow and co- herent, their observability is much lower than that of the ot her two peaks. On the ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    44 Hz, and 29

    52 Hz, 14 . 44 Hz, and 29 . 31 Hz indicate more coherent struc- tures, which are embedded inside an overall turbulent signal. These PSD and Lorentzian-fit results are fully consistent with the morpho- logical behavior of the SKBH4 model observed in Figs. 3 and 6. As known in section III, in this model, the classical shock cone is com- pletely destroyed and...

    work page

  7. [7]

    02 Hz, 72

    58 Hz, 54. 02 Hz, 72. 45 Hz, and 101 . 04 Hz are also observed in the PSD analysis of the same interval. This shows that the ear ly phase of the SKBH5 model is controlled by the violent and nonl in- ear restructuring of the accretion dynamics. Therefore, th e result- ing QPO modes are not clear and single. This behavior is consi stent with Fig.4. In contr...

    work page

  8. [8]

    44 Hz, and 44 . 00 Hz. In this case, the peak at 4 . 58 Hz has both a very strong amplitude and a strongly coherent, narrow stru cture. Therefore, it appears as the strongest observable QPO-like struc- ture. The strongest physical message is that SKBH5 produces two distinct timing states: an early transient state with viole nt, broad- band accretion varia...

    work page 1915

  9. [9]

    1 Hz produce a value close to the 3 : 2 ratio

    3 Hz and 5 . 1 Hz produce a value close to the 3 : 2 ratio. These frequencies have been reported as an important indicator for reveal- ing the presence of intermediate-mass black holes [ 58]. If the Kerr pair at 42 . 99 Hz and 68 . 13 Hz is scaled to the M82 X-1 pair, the implied black-hole mass is of order 100 M⊙. This places the source M82 X-1 in the lo...

    work page

  10. [10]

    82 Hz are scaled to the observed M82 X-1 frequen- cies 3

    86 Hz and 7 . 82 Hz are scaled to the observed M82 X-1 frequen- cies 3 . 3 Hz and 5 . 1 Hz, the corresponding black-hole masses are approximately 11 . 7M⊙ and 15 . 3M⊙, respectively. Therefore, un- like the Kerr high-frequency pair, the SKBH2 low-frequency pair does not imply an intermediate-mass black hole for M82 X-1, b ut instead corresponds to a stell...

    work page 1915

  11. [11]

    Abbott, R

    B. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V . Adya, C. A ffeldt, et al., Phys. Rev. D 100, 104036 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Abbott, T

    R. Abbott, T. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, A. Adams, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V . Adya, C. A ffeldt, et al., Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    E. H. T. Collaboration, K. Akiyama, A. Alberdi, W. Alef, K. As ada, R. Azulay, A.-K. Baczko, D. Ball, M. Balokovi ´c, J. Barrett, et al. , Ast. J. Lett. 875, L6 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Johannsen, The Astrophysical Journal 777, 170 (2013)

    T. Johannsen, The Astrophysical Journal 777, 170 (2013)

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Carson and K

    Z. Carson and K. Yagi, Phys. Rev. D 101, 084030 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Johannsen and D

    T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, Phys. Rev. D. 83, 124015 (2011)

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Cardoso, P

    V . Cardoso, P . Pani, and J. Rico, Phys. Rev. D89, 064007 (2014)

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    G. O. Papadopoulos and K. D. Kokkotas, Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 185014 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    J. B. Achour, E. Gourgoulhon, and H. Roussille, JCAP 2025 (10), 012

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Ghosh and K

    R. Ghosh and K. Chakravarti, JCAP 2025 (04), 037. 15

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    R. P . Kerr, Phys. Rev. Lett.11, 237 (1963)

    work page 1963

  22. [22]

    Carter, Phys

    B. Carter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 331 (1971)

    work page 1971

  23. [23]

    Tomimatsu and H

    A. Tomimatsu and H. Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1344 (1972)

    work page 1972

  24. [24]

    Barrientos, A

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, M. Hassaine, K. Müller, and K. Pa llikaris, Phys. Lett. B , 140035 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, and E. Herlt, Exact solutions of Einstein’s field equations (Cambridge uni- versity press, 2009)

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    Robinson and A

    I. Robinson and A. Trautman, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 265, 463 (1962)

    work page 1962

  27. [27]

    Y ousaf, H

    M. Y ousaf, H. Asad, and M. Aslam, High Energy Density Phys. 57, 101221 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Donmez, G

    O. Donmez, G. Mustafa, H. Chaudhary, M. Y ousaf, A. Bouzenada , A. Ditta, and F. Atamurotov, Phys. Dark Universe 52, 102271 (2026)

    work page 2026

  29. [29]

    Donmez, S

    O. Donmez, S. G. Ghosh, M. Y ousaf, G. Mustafa, and F. Atamurotov, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2026 (04), 045

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    Y ousaf, A

    M. Y ousaf, A. Bouzenada, A. Ditta, E. Gudekli, M. Abd El-Rahm an, I. Saidov, and F. Atamurotov, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys . https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887826502166, 2650216 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219887826502166 2026

  31. [31]

    J. L. Synge, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 131, 463 (1966)

    work page 1966

  32. [32]

    Abdujabbarov, M

    A. Abdujabbarov, M. Amir, B. Ahmedov, and S. G. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. D 93, 104004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Y ousaf, H

    M. Y ousaf, H. Asad, B. Almutairi, S. Hasan, and A. S. Khan, Phy s. Scr. 99, 115270 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Singh, S

    P . Singh, S. Kala, H. Nandan, M. Y ousaf, F. Atamurotov, and G. Mustafa, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 208, 118379 (2026)

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    H. Asad, M. Y ousaf, B. Almutairi, L. Zahid, and A. S. Khan, Phy s. Dark Universe 46, 101666 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Channuie, A

    P . Channuie, A. Ditta, N. Kaewkhao, and A. Övgün, Phys. Dark U ni- verse 50, 101963 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    M. Z. Bhatti, A. Adeel, and M. Y ousaf, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 23, 2550209 (2026)

    work page 2026

  38. [38]

    Ashraf, A

    A. Ashraf, A. Ditta, A. Bouzenada, M. Aslam, P . Channuie, F. A ta- murotov, and M. Y . Malik,Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 383 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    S. K. Maurya, A. Ditta, A. Bouzenada, A. Ashraf, A. Ali, and F. Ata- murotov, Nucl. Phys. B 1020, 117139 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    D. R. Pasham, R. A. Remillard, P . C. Fragile, et al., Science 363, 531 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    K. L. Smith, C. R. Tandon, and R. V . Wagoner, Astrophys. J. 906, 92 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    C. B. Singh, S. Mondal, and D. Garofalo, Mon. Not. R. Astron. S oc. 510, 807 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Ditta, A

    A. Ditta, A. Bouzenada, M. Alomar, and M. Bin-Asfour, Nucl. Phys. B 1019, 117099 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    D. R. Pasham, E. Coughlin, S. van V elzen, and J. Hinkle, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12078 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Ashraf, A

    A. Ashraf, A. Bouzenada, S. K. Maurya, A. A. Ibraheem, B. Ç ˙ IL, E. Güdekli, and F. Atamurotov, Phys. Dark Univ. 48, 101874 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    R. A. Remillard and J. E. McClintock, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 44, 49 (2006)

    work page 2006

  47. [47]

    Ashraf, A

    A. Ashraf, A. Ditta, A. Bouzenada, A. Abd-Elmonem, N. S. E. Ab - dalla, and F. Atamurotov, Phys. Dark Universe 47, 101823 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Rezzolla, in AIP Conf

    L. Rezzolla, in AIP Conf. Proc. , V ol. 714 (American Institute of Physics, 2004) p. 36

    work page 2004

  49. [49]

    T. M. Belloni, A. Sanna, and M. Mén- dez, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426, 1701 (2012) , arXiv:1207.2311 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  50. [50]

    J. B. Achour, A. Cisterna, and H. Roussille, J. Cosmol. Astro part. Phys. 2026 (04), 041

    work page 2026

  51. [51]

    Koyuncu and O

    F. Koyuncu and O. Dönmez, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 29, 1450115 (2014)

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    On the development of QPOs in Bondi-Hoyle accretion flows

    O. Donmez, O. Zanotti, and L. Rezzolla, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 412, 1659 (2011) , arXiv:1010.1739 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  53. [53]

    Donmez, Mod

    O. Donmez, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 39, 2450076 (2024) , arXiv:2405.15467 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Anson, E

    T. Anson, E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, and M. Hassaine, JHEP 01, 018, arXiv:2006.06461 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2006

  55. [55]

    Code Development of Three-Dimensional General Relativistic Hydrodynamics with AMR(Adaptive-Mesh Refinement) and Results From Special and General Relativistic Hydrodynamic

    O. Donmez, Astrophys. Space Sci. 293, 323 (2004) , arXiv:gr-qc/0406073

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  56. [56]

    Simulation of astrophysical jet using the special relativistic hydrodynamics code

    O. Donmez and R. Kayali, Appl. Math. Comput. 182, 1286 (2006) , arXiv:gr-qc/0602053

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  57. [57]

    Al-Badawi, F

    A. Al-Badawi, F. Ahmed, O. Donmez, F. Dogan, B. Pourhassan, i. Sakallı, and Y . Sekhmani, Phys. Dark Univ. 51, 102206 (2026) , arXiv:2509.08674 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Donmez and F

    O. Donmez and F. Dogan, Universe 10, 152 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Donmez, Eur

    O. Donmez, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1019 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Mustafa, S

    G. Mustafa, S. G. Ghosh, O. Donmez, S. K. Maurya, S. Orzuev, an d F. Atamurotov, JCAP 10, 068, arXiv:2506.16405 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  61. [61]

    Donmez, S

    O. Donmez, S. Murodov, and J. Rayimbaev, Annals of Physics 486, 170350 (2026)

    work page 2026

  62. [62]

    D¨ onmez, 2024, 006 (2024)

    O. Donmez, JCAP 09, 006, arXiv:2402.16707 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    Donmez, JHEAp 45, 1 (2025) , arXiv:2408.10102 [astro-ph.HE]

    O. Donmez, JHEAp 45, 1 (2025) , arXiv:2408.10102 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    S. E. Motta and T. M. Belloni, Astron. Astrophys. 684, A209 (2024) , arXiv:2307.00867 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    T. E. Strohmayer, Astrophys. J. Lett. 552, L49 (2001)

    work page 2001

  66. [66]

    R. A. Remillard and J. E. McClintock, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 44, 49 (2006) , arXiv:astro-ph/0606352

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  67. [67]

    Ingram and S

    A. Ingram and S. Motta, New Astron. Rev. 85, 101524 (2019) , arXiv:2001.08758 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    D. R. Pasham, T. E. Strohmayer, and R. F. Mushotzky, Nature 513, 74 (2014) , arXiv:1501.03180 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  69. [69]

    T. E. Strohmayer, R. F. Mushotzky, L. Winter, R. Soria, P . Uttley, and M. Cropper, Astrophys. J. 660, 580 (2007) , arXiv:astro-ph/0701390

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  70. [70]

    RE J1034+396: The origin of the soft X-ray excess and QPO

    M. Middleton, C. Done, M. Ward, M. Gierlinski, and N. Schurch, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 394, 250 (2009) , arXiv:0807.4847 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009