Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Stochasticity in Neural ODEs: An Empirical Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.09779 v2 pith:U3RKLUWU submitted 2020-02-22 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords neuralstochasticdeterministicempiricalaugmentationcompletelydatadifferential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Stochastic regularization of neural networks (e.g. dropout) is a wide-spread technique in deep learning that allows for better generalization. Despite its success, continuous-time models, such as neural ordinary differential equation (ODE), usually rely on a completely deterministic feed-forward operation. This work provides an empirical study of stochastically regularized neural ODE on several image-classification tasks (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, TinyImageNet). Building upon the formalism of stochastic differential equations (SDEs), we demonstrate that neural SDE is able to outperform its deterministic counterpart. Further, we show that data augmentation during the training improves the performance of both deterministic and stochastic versions of the same model. However, the improvements obtained by the data augmentation completely eliminate the empirical gains of the stochastic regularization, making the difference in the performance of neural ODE and neural SDE negligible.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Modeling Neural Networks with Privacy Using Neural Stochastic Differential Equations

    cs.CR 2025-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Neural stochastic differential equations are claimed to be differentially private learners, matching DP-SGD's membership-inference protection at better accuracy, while neural ODEs show about twice the resistance of ResNets.

Pith tools