pith. sign in

arxiv: 1701.06156 · v2 · pith:U4HQJE4Vnew · submitted 2017-01-22 · ✦ hep-th

Carroll versus Galilei Gravity

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords gravitycarrollgalileilimitcomponentsconstraintsequationsfields
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We consider two distinct limits of General Relativity that in contrast to the standard non-relativistic limit can be taken at the level of the Einstein-Hilbert action instead of the equations of motion. One is a non-relativistic limit and leads to a so-called Galilei gravity theory, the other is an ultra-relativistic limit yielding a so-called Carroll gravity theory. We present both gravity theories in a first-order formalism and show that in both cases the equations of motion (i) lead to constraints on the geometry and (ii) are not sufficient to solve for all of the components of the connection fields in terms of the other fields. Using a second-order formalism we show that these independent components serve as Lagrange multipliers for the geometric constraints we found earlier. We point out a few noteworthy differences between Carroll and Galilei gravity and give some examples of matter couplings.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Kerroll black holes

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Rotating black holes are constructed in Carroll gravity via connection freedom and an odd-power GR expansion, yielding an intrinsically Carrollian rotating solution and the Kerroll black hole analog.