The large time asymptotics of nonlinear multichannel Schroedinger equations

Avy Soffer; Baoping Liu

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 72 references

The large time asymptotics of nonlinear multichannel Schroedinger equations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For global radial $H^1$ solutions of a broad class of nonlinear Schrödinger equations in three dimensions, this paper proves the large-time state is a free radiating wave plus a weakly localized channel that spreads no faster than…

desk verdict Broad and ambitious extension of Tao's decomposition, but the central t^{1/2} localization bound is not proven under the stated hypotheses: the proof requires beta0 >= 3/2, while (H2) only gives beta0 > 1. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.07732 v1 pith:U5LGFYKK submitted 2025-01-13 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Baoping Liu , Avy Soffer This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 35Q5535B4035P2581U99

keywords nonlinearSchrödingerequationasymptoticcompletenessweaklylocalizedstatessolitonresolutionpropagationestimatesphase-spaceobservablesradialsymmetrygammaoperator

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a generic asymptotic completeness statement for radial solutions of a general class of nonlinear Schrödinger equations in three dimensions. If a solution exists globally with uniformly bounded $H^1$ norm, then at large times it is the sum of a free radiating wave and a weakly localized piece: the leftover state spreads no faster than $|x|\sim t^{1/2}$, and under extra regularity of the interaction it is smooth. The result matters because it reduces the soliton-resolution question to understanding the weakly localized channel, and it treats time-dependent potentials and nonlinearities in one framework. The proof introduces a phase-space analysis based on the radial momentum operator $\gamma$, whose large-time limit separates radiation from the localized channel.

What carries the argument

The central object is the smoothed radial outward momentum operator $\gamma=\frac12(\nabla\langle x\rangle\cdot p+p\cdot\nabla\langle x\rangle)$, together with the large-time limit $\Gamma=\lim_{t\to\infty}\langle F(\langle x\rangle/t^\alpha\ge 1)\gamma F(\langle x\rangle/t^\alpha\ge 1)\rangle$. Radiation has $\Gamma>0$; weakly localized states are defined by $\Gamma=0$, and this definition is shown to be independent of the cutoff and of the scale $\alpha\in(1/3,1)$. The argument is carried by families of phase-space propagation observables whose Heisenberg derivatives are positive up to error terms, yielding exterior estimates that localize the solution in phase space, and the final decomposition follows by Cook's method for the free channel wave operator together with propagation estimates for the leftover part.

What would settle it

A concrete check: take a radial $H^1$ global solution of the cubic equation, compute the evolution of $\langle F(\langle x\rangle/t^\alpha\ge 1)\gamma F(\langle x\rangle/t^\alpha\ge 1)\rangle_t$, and monitor the spread of the weakly localized component. The paper predicts the limit exists and is nonnegative, with zero exactly on weakly localized states, and that $(\varphi_{wl},|x|\varphi_{wl})\lesssim t^{1/2}$; a run showing a negative limiting value, or a leftover component spreading faster than $C t^{1/2}$, would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.1 asserts that for any global radial solution to (1.1) satisfying the global $H^1$ bound and the interaction decay hypothesis (H2), $$\lim_{t\to+\infty}\|\varphi(t)-e^{it\$\Delta$}\Omega_f^*\varphi_0-\varphi_{wl}(t)\|_{$H^{1}$(\mathbb{R}^3)}=0,$$ with $\Omega_f^*$ a bounded nonlinear scattering wave operator and $\varphi_{wl}$ a weakly localized state obeying $(\varphi_{wl},|x|\varphi_{wl})\lesssim t^{1/2}$. If the interaction is regular to order $N_0$, then $\varphi_{wl}$ is smooth with uniform $L^2$ bounds on $(x\cdot\nabla)^k\varphi_{wl}$ for $k\le N_0$; if the solution is time-periodic, then $x\varphi_{wl}\in L^2$ uniformly. A corollary is that the $L^2$ and $H^1$ norms of the weakly localized part have limits, and its $L^2$ mass plus the mass of the asymptotic free wave equals the initial mass.

Load-bearing premise

The theorem assumes the solution stays bounded in the energy norm $\|\varphi(t)\|_{H^1}$ for all time; if blow-up occurs, the conclusion of the theorem does not follow, and the paper states explicitly that removing this assumption is open.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every global radial $H^1$ solution of the covered equations resolves into exactly two asymptotic channels: a free wave and a weakly localized state, with no third channel.
The weakly localized state is confined to the region $|x|\lesssim t^{1/2}$, so its contribution is distinguishable from radiation by its sublinear spreading.
Under the regularity hypothesis (H3), the weakly localized state is smooth in the weighted sense $(x\cdot\nabla)^k\varphi_{wl}\in L^2$, so the localized channel cannot carry singular oscillations.
A time-periodic weakly localized solution is genuinely bound, with $\|x\varphi_{wl}\|_{L^2}\lesssim 1$, and the zero-frequency part of phase space carries no free wave.
If a solution scatters to a linear wave, its $\gamma$-limit is strictly positive, so the $\gamma$-limit distinguishes the scattering channel from the weakly localized channel.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the global $H^1$ bound could be replaced by a mechanism that excludes blow-up for the admitted nonlinearities, the theorem would become a full soliton-resolution statement for those equations; until then, finite-time blow-up is exactly the unhandled alternative.
The self-similar microlocalization of the halo, with $|x|\sim t^\alpha$ and $p\sim t^{-\alpha}$, suggests that weakly localized states may be describable by modulation around self-similar profiles, a route the paper gestures toward but does not close.
The proof's use of radial symmetry is concentrated in making an exterior commutator vanish, so extending the theorem to non-radial data is a natural but nontrivial test of the method.
The decomposition suggests a numerical diagnostic: measure the mass inside $|x|\le R t^{1/2}$; the paper predicts it converges to the squared $L^2$ norm of the weakly localized part while complementary mass scatters.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear Colleague,

I read the Liu–Soffer paper. The project is serious: they want a generic asymptotic completeness theorem for radial 3D NLS with localized, possibly time-dependent and nonlinear interactions, decomposing every global H1-bounded solution into a free wave plus a weakly localized part. The technology is a phase-space propagation observable argument adapted from N-body scattering, with a gamma-limit criterion for the localized channel. The wave operator is constructed by Cook's method, there are no fitted parameters, and the main decomposition in Sections 4–6 is long and largely coherent. This is a genuine step beyond Tao's weakly bounded decomposition, both in generality and in the strong H1 convergence.

The soft spot is the weakly localized bound. Theorem 1.1 claims (phi_wl, |x| phi_wl) ≲ t^{1/2} under (H1)(H2). The proof of that bound in Section 6.1 relies on Proposition 4.11 and Theorem 4.13, and both require the decay assumption with beta0 >= 3/2. Standing hypothesis (H2) only assumes beta0 > 1. The stress-test note is correct: for power nonlinearities a|phi|^p phi with p in (4/3, 3/2), radial Sobolev gives at most |phi| ≲ r^{-1}, so beta0 = p alpha < 3/2 for any alpha < 1. The computation in (4.43) then yields ⟨|x|⟩ ≲ t^{2−beta0}, not t^{1/2}. No bootstrap argument is supplied that raises beta0 for these interactions; the comment in the introduction about bootstrapping is too vague to close the gap. So the main theorem as stated is not established.

Two smaller issues: Theorem 7.19 on boundedness of the dilation expectation is asserted without proof, and the regularity claims in Section 8 are sketched rather than fully proved. There is also a missing reference (the Dafermos–Rodnianski citation appears only as a question mark). These are fixable but reinforce the feeling that the paper is a big-brush announcement with a solid core that needs tightening.

If the authors strengthen the hypothesis to beta0 >= 3/2, or give a real bootstrap argument that lifts beta0 for power nonlinearities, the main theorem would hold for a narrower but still substantial class. As written, the theorem overclaims. The paper deserves a serious referee: the methods are original, the propagation estimates are intricate, and the vision is important. But I would not cite the t^{1/2} result in its current form.

Recommendation: send to peer review, with the referee asked to close the gap or have the theorem restated.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a phase-space propagation-observable framework for radial, global H^1 solutions of a nonlinear/multichannel Schr"odinger equation in R^3. Under a uniform H^1 bound and a time-decay assumption on the interaction in the exterior region, the authors claim an asymptotic decomposition into a free wave, obtained through a Cook-method nonlinear wave operator, and a weakly localized solution satisfying explicit growth bounds, with additional regularity and microlocalization results under stronger hypotheses. The main theorem is Theorem 1.1, and the core technical content is the existence of the gamma limit (Section 4), the propagation estimates (Section 5), the wave operator (Section 6), and the properties of weakly bounded/localized states (Sections 7 and 8).

Significance. If the advertised decomposition is correct, it is a substantial contribution to asymptotic completeness-type results for nonlinear Schr"odinger equations, extending Tao's weakly bounded component program and providing a unified treatment of localized nonlinearities and time-dependent potentials. The paper is not circular: the wave operator is defined by a limit and proved to exist by Cook's method, and the weakly localized state is characterized through gamma-limits rather than fitted to a known ansatz. The main limitations are explicit: the proof assumes global H^1 boundedness and radial symmetry, both acknowledged. The potential value is high, but the current manuscript contains a load-bearing gap between the stated hypotheses and the proof of the central localization bound, as well as substantial portions of the regularity and microlocalization sections that are asserted rather than proved.

major comments (3)

[§6.1, Theorem 1.1, Proposition 4.11, Theorem 4.13] The central estimate (1.8), namely (φwl,|x|φwl)≲t^{1/2}, is not established under the hypotheses stated in Theorem 1.1. Theorem 1.1 assumes only (H2), which requires β0>1, but Proposition 4.11 and Theorem 4.13 require β0≥3/2; these results are explicitly invoked in Section 6.1 to obtain (6.50)-(6.51). The need for β0≥3/2 is visible in equation (4.43): the error term t^{1−β0} is dominated by max(t^{1−3α},t^{−1+α}) only when β0 is large enough, and the later choice α=1/2 forces β0≥3/2. For an interaction such as the introductory power nonlinearity |φ|^p φ with p∈(4/3,3/2), radial Sobolev gives only β0=αp with α<1, so β0<3/2; the stated hypotheses therefore genuinely allow cases in which the proof of (1.8) does not go through. The vague bootstrap comment in the introduction is not a proof, and no bootstrap in Sections 4 or 6 quantifies an improved effective β0 for the weakly localized component. The authors must either strengthen the standing assumption in Theorem 1.1 to β0≥3/2 or supply a complete bootstrap argument that derives (1.8) under β0>1.
[§7.3.2, Theorem 7.19] Theorem 7.19, which asserts ⟨|A|⟩≲1 for solutions satisfying (H1)(H2), is stated without a proof. The preceding discussion contains heuristic estimates and the sentence 'The details are postponed to the next sections', but the promised rigorous proof is not located in Sections 7 or 8. This boundedness is load-bearing for the regularity conclusions of Theorem 1.1: Proposition 7.4 and the proof of Theorem 7.20 assume uniform control of Aφ, and Theorem 7.20 is used to obtain smoothness of the weakly localized part. As written, the smoothness assertion in item (2) of Theorem 1.1 is therefore not supported by a complete proof. The theorem should either be proved fully or explicitly turned into an additional assumption for the regularity statement.
[§8, Theorem 8.2 and Theorem 8.3] The proofs in Section 8 are not fully verifiable in their current form. The iteration for the symmetrization and interaction terms in Theorem 8.2 is described in prose rather than as a precise induction with stated quantitative hypotheses; the companion estimates with logarithmic weights are introduced informally; and the high-low phase-space decomposition is presented with notation whose meaning changes from line to line. Theorem 8.3 and the microlocal description (8.57) are used to support the claimed localization and regularity of weakly localized states, so this is not merely a presentation issue. The authors should rewrite this section with complete statements of the induction hypotheses, all commutator remainder terms, and the precise classes of functions F1,F4,FA and cutoffs used in each estimate.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract and title] The abstract contains a sentence fragment ('uniformly in time. we prove...') and should be edited for grammar; the title and abstract also use inconsistent spellings 'Schroedinger' and 'Schr"odinger'.
[Theorem 1.1] In item (2) of Theorem 1.1 the object that is said to be smooth is called φwb, while the theorem and the surrounding text use φwl; this inconsistency should be fixed.
[§6.1] The text 'from Lemma 4.11, 4.12 and 4.13' is inaccurate: the results in question are Proposition 4.11, Proposition 4.12 and Theorem 4.13. The cross-references should be corrected and the hypotheses of the cited results stated explicitly at the point of use.
[§8, proof of Theorem 8.2] The phrase 'of equation 8' refers to no labeled equation, and the notation G1 and ˜F4 is used with different meanings in different lines; this makes the proof difficult to check.
[References] References [47] and [66] are the same book (Reed and Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I); one duplicate should be removed and the in-text citations updated accordingly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the theorem is derived from the equation and stated hypotheses via propagation estimates, with wave operators defined by limits and proven to exist rather than fitted.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity analysis. The nonlinear scattering operator Omega^*_F is defined by the limit (6.1) and its existence is proven by Cook's method in Theorem 6.1, so it is not an assumed or fitted input. The weakly localized component is defined as the leftover part after removing the free channel, and its localization bound (1.8) is derived from propagation estimates, commutator calculations, and the gamma-limit machinery in Sections 4-6; no parameter is fitted to the claimed output. Citations to prior PROB work, such as [52-56], are used as technical tools with the key commutator and propagation lemmas reproved or stated in the present paper, so they are not load-bearing self-citations forcing the conclusion. The skeptical concern about the beta_0 >= 3/2 versus beta_0 > 1 gap is a possible hypothesis/estimate gap or correctness issue, not a circularity: the proof does not assume the conclusion it derives. Overall, no step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof assumes rather than derives the key dynamical inputs: global H1 boundedness, radial symmetry, uniform exterior decay of the interaction, and sufficient regularity for smoothness. These are hypotheses and are not consequences of the equation. No parameters are fitted to data, so free_parameters is empty. No new physical entities are introduced; the weakly localized state is a mathematical characterization defined within the paper.

assumptions (9)

standard math Strichartz estimates (Proposition 2.2, Keel-Tao [30])
Used throughout to control solutions and Duhamel terms in mixed norms; stated without proof.
standard math Radial Sobolev embedding (Proposition 2.3)
Gives pointwise decay |phi(r)| <= r^{-1} ||phi||_{H^1}, used to verify decay of nonlinearities.
standard math Hardy inequalities (Proposition 2.4, Frank-Seiringer, Herbst)
Used in Proposition 7.1 to bound interaction terms with |x|^{-a} weights.
standard math Minimal and maximal velocity bounds for free waves (Proposition 2.5, Sigal-Soffer)
Used to convert frequency support into spatial propagation estimates; cited from prior literature.
domain assumption Global H1 bound (H1): sup_t ||phi||_{H^1} < infinity
Assumed for all theorems; Remark 1.2 acknowledges it may fail when blow-up channels are open.
domain assumption Radial symmetry of initial data and solution
Used in Lemma 3.5 and equation (2.22) to make exterior commutator terms vanish; non-radial data would require additional estimates.
domain assumption Exterior decay of interaction (H2)/(H2'): |F(|x|/t^alpha >= 1) N(phi)| <= C t^{-beta_0}, beta_0 > 1
Makes nonlinear contributions integrable in Heisenberg derivatives; verified for typical power and saturated nonlinearities but assumed in generality.
domain assumption Regularity of interaction (H3): analyticity in phi and (x * grad)^N V in L^infinity
Invoked for smoothness of the weakly localized part and microlocal refinement; exact extra conditions beyond H3 are not fully enumerated.
domain assumption Stronger decay beta_0 >= 3/2 for independence of WLS definition (Prop 4.11, Thm 4.13)
The stronger decay is needed to close growth estimates; the paper notes 'this is where we restrict beta_0 > 3/2'.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The large time asymptotics of nonlinear multichannel Schroedinger equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U5LGFYKK

@misc{pith2026250107732,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The large time asymptotics of nonlinear multichannel Schroedinger equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U5LGFYKK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.07732}
}

read the original abstract

We consider the Schroedinger equation with a general interaction term, which is localized in space. The interaction may be x, t dependent and non-linear. Purely non-linear parts of the interaction are localized via the radial Sobolev embedding. Under the assumption of radial symmetry and boundedness in H1(R3) of the solution, uniformly in time. we prove it is asymptotic in L2 (and H1) in the strong sense, to a free wave and a weakly localized solution. The general properties of the localized solutions are derived. The proof is based on the introduction of phase-space analysis of the nonlinear dispersive dynamics and relies on a new class of (exterior) a priory propagation estimates. This approach allows a unified analysis of general linear time-dependent potentials and non-linear interactions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

[1]

Barak, O

A. Barak, O. Peleg, C. Stucchio, A. Soﬀer, and M. Segev. Observation of soliton tunneling phenomena and soliton ejection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 153901 (2008)

work page 2008
[2]

Beceanu and A

M. Beceanu and A. Soﬀer. A semilinear Schroedinger equation with random potential. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.03451 (2019). 74

arXiv 2019
[3]

Borghese, R

M. Borghese, R. Jenkins, and K. T.-R. McLaughlin. Long-time asymptotic behavior of the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation. Annales Inst. H. Poincar` e, Analyse nonlin` eaire Volume 3 5, Issue 4, July 2018, Pages 887-920

work page 2018
[4]

N. Burq, G. Raugel and W. Schlag. Long time dynamics for damped Klein-Gordon equations. Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4) 50 (2017), no. 6, 1447-1498

work page 2017
[5]

Long-time asymptotics of the modified KdV equation in weighted Sobolev spaces

G. Chen and J. Liu. Soliton resolution for the modiﬁed KdV Equation. arXiv: 190 7.07115 . arXiv:1903.03855

work page Pith review arXiv 1903
[6]

G. Chen, J. Liu and B. Lu. Long-time asymptotics and stability for the sine-Gordon eq uation. arXiv: 2009.04260

arXiv 2009
[7]

Cˆ ote.On the soliton resolution for equivariant wave maps to the sp here, Comm

R. Cˆ ote.On the soliton resolution for equivariant wave maps to the sp here, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 68 (2015), no. 11, 1946–2004

work page 2015
[8]

Dauxois, M

T. Dauxois, M. Peyrard. Physics of Solitons , Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006

work page 2006

Show all 72 references

[9]

Deift, X

P. Deift, X. Zhou. A steepest descent method for oscillatory Riemann-Hilbert problems. Asymptotics for the MKdV equation. Ann. of Math. (2) 137, no. 2 (1993), 295–368

1993
[10]

R. Cote, C. Kenig, A. Lawrie and W. Schlag. Proﬁles for the radial focusing 4d energy-critical wave equ ation. Comm. Math. Phys. 357 (2018), no. 3, 943–1008

2018
[11]

Duyckaerts, H

T. Duyckaerts, H. Jia, C. Kenig and F. Merle. Soliton resolution along a sequence of times for the focusin g energy critical wave equation , Geometric and Functional Analysis, Vol 27, Issue 4, 2017, 7 98-862,

2017
[12]

Duyckaerts, C

T. Duyckaerts, C. Kenig, Y. Martel, and F. Merle. Soliton resolution for critical co-rotational wave maps an d radial cubic wave equation . arXiv:2103.01293

arXiv
[13]

Duyckaerts, C

T. Duyckaerts, C. Kenig, and F. Merle. Universality of blow-up proﬁle for small radial type II blow -up solutions of the energy-critical wave equation , J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 13 (2011), no. 3, 533–599

2011
[14]

Duyckaerts, C

T. Duyckaerts, C. Kenig, and F. Merle. Proﬁles of bounded radial solutions of the focusing, energy –critical wave equation. Geom. Funct. Anal. 22 (2012), 639–698

2012
[15]

Duyckaerts, C

T. Duyckaerts, C. Kenig, and F. Merle. Classiﬁcation of radial solutions of the focusing, energy– critical wave equation. Cambridge Journ. of Math. 1 (2013), 75–144

2013
[16]

Duyckaerts, C

T. Duyckaerts, C. Kenig, and F. Merle. Solutions of the focusing nonradial critical wave equation with the compactness property, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 15 (2016), 731–808

2016
[17]

Duyckaerts, C

T. Duyckaerts, C. E. Kenig, and F. Merle. Exterior energy bounds for the critical wave equation close to the ground state. Comm. Math. Phys., 379:1113–1175, 2020

2020
[18]

Duyckaerts, C

T. Duyckaerts, C. E. Kenig, and F. Merle. Decay estimates for nonradiative solutions of the energy-c ritical focusing wave equation . J. Geom. Anal., 2021

2021
[19]

Duyckaerts, C

T. Duyckaerts, C. E. Kenig, and F. Merle. Soliton resolution for the radial critical wave equation in all odd space dimensions. Acta Math., to appear
[20]

Eckhaus, and P

W. Eckhaus, and P. C. Schuur. The emergence of solitons of the Korteweg-de Vries equation from arbitrary initial conditions. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 5, 1 (1983), 97–116

1983
[21]

Frank, R

R.L. Frank, R. Seiringer. Non-linear ground state representations and sharp Hardy in equalities, J. Funct. Anal. 255 (12) (2008) 3407–3430

2008
[22]

Jenkins, J

R. Jenkins, J. Liu, P. Perry and C. Sulem. Soliton Resolution for the Derivative Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equation , Comm. Math. Phys. 363 (2018), no. 3, 1003–1049

2018
[23]

I. W. Herbst. Spectral theory of the operator (p2 + m2) 1 2 − Ze 2/r . Comm. Math. Phys. 53 (1977), no. 3, 285–294

1977
[24]

Hunziker and I.M

W. Hunziker and I.M. Sigal. The quantum N-body problem . J. Math. Phys. 41 (2000), no. 6, 3448–3510

2000
[25]

Hunziker and I.M

W. Hunziker and I.M. Sigal. Time-dependent scattering theory of n-body quantum system s Reviews in Mathe- matical Physics, Vol. 12, No. 8 (2000) 1033–1084

2000
[26]

Hunziker, I.M

W. Hunziker, I.M. Sigal, A. Soﬀer. Minimal Escape Velocities, CPDE 24, no11-12, (1999), 2279-2295

1999
[27]

Jendrej and A

J. Jendrej and A. Lawrie. Soliton resolution for equivariant wave maps . arXiv:2106.10738

arXiv
[28]

Jia and C

H. Jia and C. Kenig. Asymptotic decomposition for semilinear wave and equivari ant wave map equations , American Journal of Mathematics 139 (2017), pages 1521-160 3

2017
[29]

H. Jia, B. Liu and G. Xu. Long time dynamics of defocusing energy critical 3 + 1 dimens ional wave equation with potential in the radial case . Communications in Mathematical Physics, Volume 339, Issu e 2, pp 353-384
[30]

M. Keel, T. Tao, Endpoint Strichartz estimates. Amer. J. Math., 120(1998), 955-980

1998
[31]

Kirr, E., and M. I. Weinstein. Metastable states in parametrically excited multimode Ham iltonian sys- tems.Communications in mathematical physics 236.2 (2003): 335- 372

2003
[32]

Killip, T

R. Killip, T. Oh, P. Pocovnicu and M. Vi¸ san.Solitons and Scattering for the Cubic–Quintic Nonlinear Sc hr¨ odinger Equation on R3. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 225(1) (2017 ), pp.469-548

2017
[33]

Kenig, A

C. Kenig, A. Lawrie, B. Liu and W. Schlag. Stable soliton resolution for exterior wave maps in all equi variance classes. Advances in Math. 285 (2015), 235-300

2015
[34]

Kenig, A

C. Kenig, A. Lawrie and W. Schlag. Relaxation of wave maps exterior to a ball to harmonic maps fo r all data . Geom. Funct. Anal. (GAF A). 24 (2014), no. 2, 610-647. 75

2014
[35]

Kapitula and B

T. Kapitula and B. Sandstede. Stability of bright solitary-wave solutions to perturbed n onlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 124(1-3) (1998), pp.58-10 3

1998
[36]

K. Kim, S. Kwon, and S.-J. Oh, Soliton resolution for equivariant self-dual Chern-Simon s-Schr¨ odinger equation in weighted Sobolev class. Arxiv: 2202.07314
[37]

Komech, A.A

A.I. Komech, A.A. Komech. Global attractor for a nonlinear oscillator coupled to the K lein–Gordon ﬁeld . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 185 (2007), 105–142,

2007
[38]

Liu and A

B. Liu and A. Soﬀer. A General Scattering theory for Nonlinear and Non-autonomo us Schroedinger Type Equations-A Brief description. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.14382 (2020)

2020 arXiv
[39]

A.I. Komech. On attractor of a singular nonlinear U(1)-invariant Klein– Gordon equation, in Progress in analysis, Vol. I, II (2001, Berlin), World Sci. Publishing, River Edge , NJ, 2003, 599–611

2001
[40]

a nd Chen, G.,

Lin, T.C., Beli´ c, M.R., Petrovi´ c, M.S., Hajaiej, H. a nd Chen, G., . The virial theorem and ground state energy estimates of nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations in R2 with square root and saturable nonlinearities in nonlinear optics. Calculus of Variations and Partial Diﬀere...

2017
[41]

Manton and P

N. Manton and P. Sutcliﬀe. Topological Solitons. Cambridge Monogr. Math. Phys., Cam- bridge University Pre ss, Cambridge 2004

2004
[42]

Malomed Phys

Hidetsugu Sakaguchi and Boris A. Malomed Phys. Rev. E 73 , 026601 – Published 2 February 2006

2006
[43]

Limit behavior of saturated approximations of nonlinear Sc hr¨ odinger equation.Communications in mathematical physics, 149(2) 1992, pp.377-414

Merle, F. . Limit behavior of saturated approximations of nonlinear Sc hr¨ odinger equation.Communications in mathematical physics, 149(2) 1992, pp.377-414

1992
[44]

Y. Martel. Interaction of solitons from the PDE point of view , PROC. INT. CONG. OF MATH. – 2018– 2018 Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 3 (2457–2484)

2018
[45]

Marzuola, J.L. A Class of Stable Perturbations for a Minimal Mass Soliton in Three-Dimensional Saturated Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equations.SIAM journal on mathematical analysis, 42(3) 2010, pp.1382 -1403

2010
[46]

Pyke, Randall Mitchell, and I. M. Sigal. Nonlinear wave equations: Constraints on periods and expon ential bounds for periodic solutions. Duke Mathematical Journal 88.1 (1997): 133-180

1997
[48]

Rodnianski, W

I. Rodnianski, W. Schlag, and A. Soﬀer. Asymptotic stability of N-soliton states of NLS , ArXiv e-prints: math/0309114 (2003)

2003 arXiv
[49]

P. C. Schuur. Asymptotic analysis of soliton problems . vol. 1232 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1986. An inverse scattering approach

1986
[50]

H. Segur. The Korteweg-de Vries equation and water waves. Solutions o f the equation . I. J. Fluid Mech. 59 (1973), 721–736

1973
[51]

Segur, , and M

H. Segur, , and M. J. Ablowitz. Asymptotic solutions and conservation laws for the nonline ar Schr¨ odinger equation. J. Mathematical Phys. 17, 5 (1976), 710–716

1976
[52]

I. M. Sigal and A. Soﬀer. The N-particle scattering problem: asymptotic completene ss for short-range systems , Ann. of Math. (2) 126 (1987), no. 1, 35–108. MR 898052

1987
[53]

Sigal and A

I.M. Sigal and A. Soﬀer. Local decay and propagation estimates for timedependent an d time-independent Hamil- tonians. Preprint, Princeton Univ. (1988) http://www.math.toron to.edu/sigal/publications/SigSofVelBnd.pdf

1988
[54]

I. M. Sigal and A. Soﬀer. Long-range many-body scattering. Asymptotic clustering f or Coulomb-type potentials , Invent. Math. 99 (1990), no. 1, 115–143. MR 1029392

1990
[55]

I. M. Sigal and A. Soﬀer. Asymptotic completeness for N ≤ 4 particle systems with the Coulomb-type interactions , Duke Math. J. 71 (1993), no. 1, 243–298. MR 1230292

1993
[56]

I. M. Sigal and A. Soﬀer, Asymptotic completeness of N-particle long-range scatter ing, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (1994), no. 2, 307–334. MR 1233895

1994
[57]

A. Soﬀer. Soliton dynamics and scattering, International Congress o f Mathematicians . Vol. III, Eur. Math. Soc., Z¨ urich, 2006, pp. 459–471

2006
[58]

A. Soﬀer. Monotonic Local Decay Estimates , arXiv:1110.6549

arXiv
[59]

Soﬀer and M.I

A. Soﬀer and M.I. Weinstein. Multichannel nonlinear scattering for nonintegrable equa tions. Comm. Math. Phys. 133 (1990), 119–146

1990
[60]

Soﬀer and M.I

A. Soﬀer and M.I. Weinstein. Multichannel nonlinear scattering, II. The case of anisotr opic potentials and data . J. Diﬀerential Equations 98 (1992), 376–390

1992
[61]

Sulem, P.-L

C. Sulem, P.-L. Sulem. The nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation. Self-focusing and wa ve collapse . Appl. Math. Sci. 139, Springer-Verlag, New York 1999

1999
[62]

Rajaraman

R. Rajaraman. Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction to Solitons and In stantons in Quantum Field Theory . North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1982

1982
[63]

Rodriguez

C. Rodriguez. Soliton resolution for equivariant wave maps on a wormhole. Comm. Math. Phys. 359 (2018), no. 1, 375–426. 76

2018
[64]

Rodriguez

C. Rodriguez. Soliton resolution for corotational wave maps on a wormhole . Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2019, no. 15, 4603–4706

2019
[65]

T. Roy. A weak form of the soliton resolution conjecture for high-di mensional fourth-order Schr¨ odinger equations. J. Hyperbolic Diﬀer. Equ. 14 (2017), no. 2, 249–300

2017
[66]

Reed and B

M. Reed and B. Simon. Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. I. Functional Anal ysis, Academic Press, New York, 1972

1972
[67]

The nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation: self-focusing and wave collapse

Sulem, Catherine, and Pierre-Louis Sulem. The nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation: self-focusing and wave collapse. (2007)

2007
[68]

T. Tao. On the asymptotic behavior of large radial data for a focusin g non-linear Schr¨ odinger equation.Dynamics of PDE, Vol.1, No.1, 1-47, 2004

2004
[69]

T. Tao. A (Concentration-)Compact Attractor for High-dimensional Non-linear Schr¨ odinger Equations. Dynamics of PDE, Vol.4, No.1, 1-53, 2007

2007
[70]

T. Tao. A global compact attractor for high-dimensional defocusin g nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with poten- tial. Dynamics of PDE, Vol.5, No.2, 101-116, 2008

2008
[71]

T. Tao. Why are solitons stable? Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 46, 1 (2009), 1–33

2009
[72]

Y. Yang. Solitons in Field Theory and Nonlinear Analysis , Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer- Verlag, 2001

2001
[73]

V. E. Zakharov, A. B. Shabat. Exact theory of two-dimensional self-focusing and one-dim ensional self-modulation of waves in nonlinear media . Z. Eksper. Teoret. Fiz. 61, 1 (1971), 118–134. Beijing International Center for Mathematical Research, P eking University, Beijing, Ch...

1971

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Barak, O

A. Barak, O. Peleg, C. Stucchio, A. Soﬀer, and M. Segev. Observation of soliton tunneling phenomena and soliton ejection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 153901 (2008)

work page 2008

[2] [2]

Beceanu and A

M. Beceanu and A. Soﬀer. A semilinear Schroedinger equation with random potential. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.03451 (2019). 74

arXiv 2019

[3] [3]

Borghese, R

M. Borghese, R. Jenkins, and K. T.-R. McLaughlin. Long-time asymptotic behavior of the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation. Annales Inst. H. Poincar` e, Analyse nonlin` eaire Volume 3 5, Issue 4, July 2018, Pages 887-920

work page 2018

[4] [4]

N. Burq, G. Raugel and W. Schlag. Long time dynamics for damped Klein-Gordon equations. Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4) 50 (2017), no. 6, 1447-1498

work page 2017

[5] [5]

Long-time asymptotics of the modified KdV equation in weighted Sobolev spaces

G. Chen and J. Liu. Soliton resolution for the modiﬁed KdV Equation. arXiv: 190 7.07115 . arXiv:1903.03855

work page Pith review arXiv 1903

[6] [6]

G. Chen, J. Liu and B. Lu. Long-time asymptotics and stability for the sine-Gordon eq uation. arXiv: 2009.04260

arXiv 2009

[7] [7]

Cˆ ote.On the soliton resolution for equivariant wave maps to the sp here, Comm

R. Cˆ ote.On the soliton resolution for equivariant wave maps to the sp here, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 68 (2015), no. 11, 1946–2004

work page 2015

[8] [8]

Dauxois, M

T. Dauxois, M. Peyrard. Physics of Solitons , Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006

work page 2006