$\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ Theta Subgroup Structure of Maxwell theory in the Lattice Villain Hamiltonian Formulation

Shoto Aoki; Toshinari Takemoto; Yoshio Kikukawa

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 45 references

The paper constructs operator-level S and T² transformations that realize the theta subgroup of SL(2,Z) duality in lattice Maxwell theory with a theta term, and proves the expected charge transformations, including the Witten effect, along

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 02:44 UTC pith:U622UQ7Y

load-bearing objection A careful operator-level construction of S and T^2 for the Villain Maxwell Hamiltonian, but the central claim only holds on a unitarily reduced system; the lift back to the physical Hilbert space is missing and the group relations are never checked. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.25332 v1 pith:U622UQ7Y submitted 2026-07-28 hep-lat

SL(2,mathbb{Z}) Theta Subgroup Structure of Maxwell theory in the Lattice Villain Hamiltonian Formulation

Shoto Aoki , Yoshio Kikukawa , Toshinari Takemoto This is my paper

classification hep-lat

keywords lattice Maxwell theoryHamiltonian Villain formulationtheta termSL(2,Z) dualitytheta subgroupelectric-magnetic dualityWitten effectnon-invertible symmetry

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that lattice Maxwell theory in the Hamiltonian Villain formulation, with a theta term, realizes the theta subgroup of SL(2,Z) duality as explicit operators on the lattice Hilbert space. A modified S transformation maps the coupling (β, θ) as τ → −1/τ, while T² shifts θ by 4π, and the two close into the theta subgroup structure. In charged sectors, S exchanges electric and magnetic charge densities, while T² shifts electric charge by twice the magnetic charge, reproducing the Witten effect on the lattice. The paper also builds a non-invertible defect by gauging a Z_N subgroup of the 1-form symmetry and derives its Tambara–Yamagami fusion rule. If correct, this gives a finite-volume lattice Hamiltonian realization of the bosonic duality structure of Maxwell theory, including strong–weak coupling duality and charge transmutation.

Core claim

The central claim is that the bosonic Villain lattice Hamiltonian with a theta term is self-dual under an operator-level Sθ, provided the theta dependence is first reduced to the harmonic zero-momentum sector. The naive S transformation maps the theta Hamiltonian to a form that does not preserve the original structure; the paper shows the obstruction lives entirely in non-zero momentum modes, which can be removed by a gauge-invariant unitary transformation. After this reduction, the modified kernel Sθ maps H_red(β,θ) to H_red'(β′,θ′) with β′ = β/((2πβ)² + (θ/2π)²) and θ′ = −θ/((2πβ)² + (θ/2π)²), exactly the modular action τ → −1/τ. In charged sectors, Sθ exchanges Gauss-law violations with B

What carries the argument

The central object is the Villain Hamiltonian on a spatial 3-torus, with compact U(1) encoded through a Z-valued 2-form n and an R-valued 1-form A^e. The argument proceeds by Hodge decomposition n = dp + ∂q + h, isolating the harmonic zero modes; a gauge-invariant unitary U = exp(−iθ/8π² Σ (Â^e + 2πp) ∪ d(Â^e + 2πp)) removes the non-zero-momentum theta coupling; and a modified Sθ kernel built from cup products and projection operators P_d, P_∂, P_0 implements τ → −1/τ on the reduced Hamiltonian. T² is constructed from the level-two lattice Chern–Simons action, and a framing-flip correction in the charge-sector kernel removes a lattice shift that otherwise appears under S. The entire structur

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the unitary transformation U removes all non-zero-momentum theta coupling, leaving theta only in the harmonic zero modes, and that the modified Sθ defined on this reduced system lifts to a genuine duality operator on the original Villain Hilbert space; the paper does not explicitly write the lift back to the original Hilbert space.

What would settle it

On a finite L³ torus, compute the conjugated full Hamiltonian Sθ† H(β,θ) Sθ on the original Villain Hilbert space, not just on the reduced zero-mode sector, for fixed charge sectors (ρ_e, ρ_m). If the result differs from H(β′,θ′) by terms that do not vanish after the unitary reduction, the claimed theta-subgroup structure of the original Hamiltonian would fail.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

If the paper's construction is correct, the lattice Villain Hamiltonian at finite volume exhibits exact strong–weak coupling duality within the theta subgroup, with the zero-mode sector carrying the modular action on coupling constants.
In sectors with electric and magnetic charges, S exchanges the charge types and T² shifts electric charge by twice the magnetic charge, giving a lattice realization of the Witten effect and dyon creation.
The Z_N-gauging defect is non-invertible: it fuses with its conjugate into a sum over Z_N 1-form symmetry operators, and it maps the complex coupling as τ → −N²/τ.
A full SL(2,Z) structure with the T transformation shifting θ by 2π cannot be realized in the bosonic theory alone; fermionic degrees of freedom would be needed, as the paper argues from the spin dependence of odd-level Chern–Simons theory.
The framing-flip correction indicates that the Hamiltonian duality carries a point-split anomaly that must be carefully tracked when exchanging electric and magnetic line operators.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Testable extension: exact diagonalization on a small L³ torus of the full Villain Hamiltonian before and after conjugation by Sθ would reveal whether the non-zero-mode decoupling holds for all states; a mismatch would show the duality is only a property of the reduced zero-mode system.
The θ-dependent normalization Rθ suggests that Sθ is not a simple isometry and may encode a modular weight or anomaly phase; tracking its action on states with definite magnetic flux could expose additional structure beyond the subgroup relations.
The framing-flip term may be the Hamiltonian counterpart of the Euclidean relation where Poisson summation is accompanied by (PT)³; deriving that identity directly in operator language could clarify the anomaly and connect to line-operator statistics.
If fermionic degrees of freedom are added, the same zero-mode reduction suggests the T transformation should act as a one-site staggered shift on fermions, offering a path to a lattice realization of discrete chiral symmetry in 3+1d QED.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

A careful operator-level construction of S and T^2 for the Villain Maxwell Hamiltonian, but the central claim only holds on a unitarily reduced system; the lift back to the physical Hilbert space is missing and the group relations are never checked.

read the letter

Here is my read. This paper is a serious attempt to construct the theta-subgroup duality (S and T^2) as operators on the Villain Hamiltonian Hilbert space, including the theta term, electric/magnetic charges, and a non-invertible defect. The explicit kernels, the verification of unitarity in App. C, the charge-exchange under S, the Witten effect under T^2, and the Tambara–Yamagami fusion rule for the gauged Z_N defect are all concrete, clearly presented, and extend the Euclidean [12] and Hamiltonian [15] results in a real way. At theta = 0, the S operator is well defined and the Hamiltonian mapping is correct. Credit is due for that.

The soft spot is the one flagged in the stress-test, and it lands. In Sec. 3.3, the authors introduce a gauge-invariant unitary U that removes the nonzero-momentum theta coupling, defining H_red = U^dag H U. They then construct S_theta and show S_theta H_red(beta,theta) = H'_red(beta',theta') S_theta. But the physical Hamiltonian is H = U H_red U^dag. To claim that S_theta is a duality of the original theory, one must show S_theta H = H' S_theta, which would follow from a relation like S_theta U = U' S_theta (with U' the same functional at theta'). That relation is not stated, and it is not obviously implied by the kernel. As written, the paper establishes the duality of the reduced Hamiltonian, not of the lattice Maxwell Hamiltonian with theta term. This is a load-bearing gap, not a cosmetic omission.

There is a secondary issue: even for the reduced system, the authors never verify the group relations among S and T^2 (e.g., S^2, (ST^2)^3, or the braiding relation). They show individual actions on the Hamiltonian and call it the theta subgroup structure, but that phrase overclaims what is demonstrated. The same reduction issue carries over to the non-invertible defect with theta in Sec. 5.2.

These are addressable rather than fatal. If the commutator with U can be established, or if the physical duality operator is explicitly defined as a conjugate of S_theta, the main conclusion would go through. As it stands, the abstract's central claim is stronger than the proof.

This paper is for lattice field theorists working on Villain formulations, exact dualities, and non-invertible symmetries. It deserves a serious referee, but one who will push on the reduction-to-lift step and the group relations. I would not cite it in its present form, but I would watch for a revised version.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies S- and T^2-duality transformations in lattice Maxwell theory with a theta term, in the Hamiltonian Villain formulation on a 3D torus. It constructs an explicit integral-kernel operator S at θ=0, verifies its unitarity on the physical Hilbert space, and introduces a gauge-invariant unitary U that removes the non-zero-momentum part of the theta coupling. The paper then defines a modified operator Sθ and shows that it maps the reduced Hamiltonian H_red(β,θ) to H_red(β',θ') with the standard S transformation τ -> -1/τ. It extends the construction to sectors with electric and magnetic charges, where S exchanges charges and T^2 produces the Witten effect, and introduces a framing-flip modification to remove lattice shifts. Finally, it constructs a Z_N gauging defect and derives a fusion rule of the form N^†N = (1/N) Σ η, claimed to be the Tambara-Yamagami fusion rule.

Significance. If the central claims are established, this is a valuable contribution: it gives explicit operator-level transformations for the theta subgroup of SL(2,Z) in the Hamiltonian Villain formulation, including charge transmutation, and connects a lattice defect construction to expected non-invertible symmetry structures. The paper has notable strengths: explicit kernels, detailed gauge-invariance checks, a unitarity appendix, and parameter-free transformation formulas. However, the central duality statement is proven only for the reduced Hamiltonian H_red, not for the original physical Hamiltonian, and the operator algebra required for a genuine 'theta subgroup realization' is not verified. The Tambara-Yamagami claim is also only partially supported. These issues are load-bearing for the abstract claims, though they appear fixable within the manuscript's framework.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 3.3, Eqs. (3.44)-(3.61)] The abstract and Sec. 3.3 claim that Sθ realizes the S transformation of the physical Hamiltonian with theta term. What is proven is that Sθ maps the reduced Hamiltonian H_red = U^† H(β,θ) U to H_red'(β',θ'). Since H(β,θ) = U H_red U^†, the physical statement requires an explicit physical duality operator. The natural definition is D = U(β',θ') Sθ U(β,θ)^†; one then obtains D H(β,θ) = H'(β',θ') D. This D is not written down, and the text instead says 'Sθ is correctly defined as the operator implementing the S transformation'. Without this conjugation step, the central claim that Sθ acts on the original Villain Hilbert space is not established.
[Sec. 3.3 and Sec. 6] The phrase 'realize the theta subgroup structure of SL(2,Z)' is stronger than showing the action on the coupling constant. To claim an operator-level realization of the group generated by S and T^2, one should specify the composition law of the physical duality operators and verify the group relations on the physical Hilbert space, for example S^2 = -1 or the corresponding relations involving T^2. The paper checks the map on β and θ (Eq. 3.63) but does not check any operator relation between S and T^2. This may be a matter of emphasis, but as written it leaves the 'subgroup structure' claim supported only at the level of parameters.
[Secs. 5.1-5.2, Eqs. (5.19), (5.35)] The Tambara-Yamagami fusion category has, in addition to the group-like objects, a single self-dual object ρ satisfying ρ⊗ρ = ⊕ η and ρ⊗η = ρ. The paper derives only N^† N = (1/N) Σ η, which is the fusion of the defect with its dual. To identify the defect with the TY object one must show that N is self-dual (or isomorphic to its dual) and compute N×N, or at least explain why the obtained relation suffices. This is not merely cosmetic: for N=1 the operators in (3.59)-(3.60) imply S^2 = -1 on the zero modes, so self-adjointness of the defect is nontrivial.
[Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (4.68)-(4.78)] The framing-flip modified kernel K_L^fl changes the longitudinal sector of the S operator. The paper checks gauge invariance of this modification, but the unitarity proof in Appendix C is carried out for the original kernel K_L, not for K_L^fl. Since the modified operator S_fl is used to establish the clean charge exchange (4.74)-(4.76) and the Hamiltonian transformation (4.77), a unitarity check for the modified kernel is needed. It may follow by a calculation analogous to Appendix C, but that calculation is not presented.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. 3.3, after Eq. (3.60)] Typo: 'These transformation properties imply that Nθ transforms...' should read 'Sθ transforms...'.
[Sec. 4.3, Eq. (4.73)] Typo: 'S^{T+T}_fl' should be 'S^{T+L}_fl'.
[Sec. 6] Typo: 'thransfotmation' should be 'transformation'.
[Eqs. (3.52)-(3.53)] The kernel Kθ is written in terms of p and p', which are nonlocal functions of n and n' via the Hodge decomposition. This should be stated explicitly at first use; otherwise the notation suggests p and p' are independent integration variables.
[Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.65)] The notation H_ch' in (4.65) is initially written with (β,θ) rather than (β',θ') even though the following sentence states the transformation of parameters. Please make the parameter dependence of the transformed Hamiltonian explicit to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: the duality algebra is self-contained; the main caveat is a unitary-lift gap, which is a correctness issue, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is an explicit operator-level calculation from declared lattice definitions. The inputs β, θ, N are physical parameters, not fitted constants: the Sθ kernel is first written down and the operator identities (3.57)-(3.60) are then obtained by direct differentiation/summation, yielding (3.61) for the reduced Hamiltonian. The T² shift and the Witten-effect charge transformation (4.10)-(4.14) follow from explicit commutators with the Chern-Simons phase, and the TY fusion rule in Sec. 5 is obtained by an explicit Gaussian/δ-function evaluation with the normalization chosen to make the defect operator unitary; none of these results is obtained by renaming a fit or by assuming the target relation in the definition. External inputs (cup-product identities from [45], topological charge decomposition from [7,21], theta-term form from [28]) are independent of this paper's results. The self-citation [12] supplies motivation and the framing-flip interpretation but is not the load-bearing step of the Hamiltonian calculation. The paper also explicitly restricts to the bosonic theory, noting that the full SL(2,Z) structure would require fermionic degrees of freedom; this is a stated scope limitation, not a circular step. One genuine gap exists but is not circular: the paper proves Sθ H_red(β,θ)=H'_red(β',θ') Sθ for H_red=U†HU (Eqs. 3.45 and 3.61) and does not exhibit a commutation relation between Sθ and U, so the lift to the original Hamiltonian H is asserted rather than derived. This is an unsupported step in the claimed derivation chain, but it is not a case of the conclusion being equivalent by construction to the input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters or invented entities. The construction uses only the physical inputs β, θ, N and standard lattice mathematics (Hodge decomposition, cup products). The modified Sθ and the non-invertible defect are operators built from these inputs, not new physics postulated to fit a result.

axioms (5)

standard math Hodge decomposition of lattice forms with projection operators P_d, P_∂, P_0 and unique real p ∈ Im ∂^{(2)}
Used throughout Sec. 3.3 and 4.2 to separate zero modes and charge sectors; stated in Appendix A with explicit momentum-space formulas.
standard math Cup product and higher cup product identities (B.6), (B.15), and projection properties (B.7)
Underpin the Chern-Simons action, the unitary reductions, and the kernel manipulations; cited from [45]/[12].
domain assumption Physical Hilbert space defined by Gauss law and no-monopole constraint; charges introduced as violations of these constraints
Sec. 2 and 4.1. This is the standard Hamiltonian Villain setup from [15].
domain assumption The theta term has the split form (3.33), agreeing with [28], and T is generated by exponentiating the level-one lattice Chern-Simons action (3.30)
Sec. 3.2. This is the lattice definition adopted; the split form is a consequence of the staggered Chern-Simons structure.
domain assumption Odd-level Chern-Simons theory is a spin theory, so the bosonic T is anomalous; the paper restricts to T2
Sec. 1 and 3.2; used to justify focusing on the theta subgroup.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 33822 in / 18676 out tokens · 174263 ms · 2026-08-01T02:44:31.855935+00:00 · methodology

0 comments

read the original abstract

We study the duality structure of lattice Maxwell theory with a theta term in the Hamiltonian Villain formulation. Reflecting the fact that odd-level Chern--Simons theory depends on a choice of spin structure, a complete realization of the full $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ structure would require fermionic degrees of freedom. We therefore restrict our analysis to the bosonic theory and focus on the theta subgroup generated by the $\mathcal{S}$ and $\mathcal{T}^{2}$ transformations. We construct these transformations at the operator level and show that they realize the theta subgroup structure of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb Z)$. We also extend the analysis to sectors with electric and magnetic charges, introduced as violations of the Gauss-law constraint and the Bianchi identity, respectively. We show that the $\mathcal S$ transformation exchanges electric and magnetic charges, while the $\mathcal T^2$ transformation realizes the Witten effect. Finally, we discuss a related non-invertible defect obtained by gauging a $\mathbb Z_N$ subgroup of the global $\mathrm{U}(1)$ $1$-form symmetry, and show that its fusion rule reproduces the expected Tambara--Yamagami structure.

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 31 linked inside Pith

[1]

Goddard, J

P. Goddard, J. Nuyts and D.I. Olive,Gauge Theories and Magnetic Charge,Nucl. Phys. B 125(1977) 1

1977
[2]

Montonen and D.I

C. Montonen and D.I. Olive,Magnetic Monopoles as Gauge Particles?,Phys. Lett. B72 (1977) 117

1977
[3]

Witten and D.I

E. Witten and D.I. Olive,Supersymmetry Algebras That Include Topological Charges,Phys. Lett. B78(1978) 97. – 40 –

1978
[4]

Osborn,Topological Charges for N=4 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and Monopoles of Spin 1,Phys

H. Osborn,Topological Charges for N=4 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and Monopoles of Spin 1,Phys. Lett. B83(1979) 321

1979
[5]

Seiberg and E

N. Seiberg and E. Witten,Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD,Nucl. Phys. B431(1994) 484 [hep-th/9408099]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[6]

Witten,OnS-duality in Abelian gauge theory,Selecta Math.1(1995) 383 [hep-th/9505186]

E. Witten,OnS-duality in Abelian gauge theory,Selecta Math.1(1995) 383 [hep-th/9505186]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[7]

Anosova, C

M. Anosova, C. Gattringer and T. Sulejmanpasic,Self-dual U(1) lattice field theory with a θ-term,JHEP04(2022) 120 [2201.09468]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[8]

Anosova, C

M. Anosova, C. Gattringer, N. Iqbal and T. Sulejmanpasic,Phase structure of self-dual lattice gauge theories in 4d,JHEP06(2022) 149 [2203.14774]

arXiv 2022
[9]

Honda and Y

M. Honda and Y. Tanizaki,Topological aspects of 4D Abelian lattice gauge theories with theθ parameter,JHEP12(2020) 154 [2009.10183]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[10]

Hayashi and Y

Y. Hayashi and Y. Tanizaki,Non-invertible self-duality defects of Cardy-Rabinovici model and mixed gravitational anomaly,JHEP08(2022) 036 [2204.07440]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[11]

Katayama and Y

N. Katayama and Y. Tanizaki,2d Cardy-Rabinovici model with the modified Villain lattice: exact dualities and symmetries,JHEP11(2025) 004 [2505.19412]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[12]

S. Aoki, Y. Kikukawa and T. Takemoto,Exact SL(2,Z)-Structure of Lattice Maxwell Theory withθ-term in Modified Villain Formulation,2604.08736

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[13]

Villain,Theory of one-dimensional and two-dimensional magnets with an easy magnetization plane

J. Villain,Theory of one-dimensional and two-dimensional magnets with an easy magnetization plane. 2. The Planar, classical, two-dimensional magnet,J. Phys. (France)36 (1975) 581

1975
[14]

DeGrand and D

T.A. DeGrand and D. Toussaint,Topological Excitations and Monte Carlo Simulation of Abelian Gauge Theory,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 2478

1980
[15]

Fazza and T

L. Fazza and T. Sulejmanpasic,Lattice quantum Villain Hamiltonians: compact scalars, U(1) gauge theories, fracton models and quantum Ising model dualities,JHEP05(2023) 017 [2211.13047]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[16]

Yoneda,Equivalence of the modified Villain formulation and the dual Hamiltonian method in the duality of the XY-plaquette model,2211.01632

M. Yoneda,Equivalence of the modified Villain formulation and the dual Hamiltonian method in the duality of the XY-plaquette model,2211.01632

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[17]

Jacobson and T

T. Jacobson and T. Sulejmanpasic,Canonical quantization of lattice Chern-Simons theory, JHEP11(2024) 087 [2401.09597]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[18]

Ikeda,A Lattice U(1) Chern-Simons Theory via Lattice Deligne-Beilinson Cohomology, 2601.15939

Y. Ikeda,A Lattice U(1) Chern-Simons Theory via Lattice Deligne-Beilinson Cohomology, 2601.15939

arXiv
[19]

Han and J.-Y

Z. Han and J.-Y. Chen,Solvable lattice Hamiltonians with fractional Hall conductivity,Phys. Rev. B105(2022) 155130 [2107.02817]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[20]

Han and J.-Y

Z. Han and J.-Y. Chen,Fractional Hall conductivity and spin-c structure in solvable lattice Hamiltonians,JHEP02(2023) 130 [2208.13785]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[21]

Jacobson and T

T. Jacobson and T. Sulejmanpasic,Modified Villain formulation of Abelian Chern-Simons theory,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 125017 [2303.06160]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[22]

Xu and J.-Y

Z.-A. Xu and J.-Y. Chen,Lattice Chern-Simons-Maxwell theory and its chirality,JHEP08 (2025) 062 [2410.11034]. – 41 –

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[23]

DeMarco and X.-G

M. DeMarco and X.-G. Wen,CompactU k(1)Chern-Simons Theory as a Local Bosonic Lattice Model with Exact Discrete 1-Symmetries,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 021603 [1906.08270]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[24]

Peng, M.C

C. Peng, M.C. Diamantini, L. Funcke, S.M.A. Hassan, K. Jansen, S. K¨ uhn et al., Hamiltonian Lattice Formulation of Compact Maxwell-Chern-Simons Theory,2407.20225

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[25]

Dijkgraaf and E

R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten,Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology,Commun. Math. Phys.129(1990) 393

1990
[26]

Belov and G.W

D. Belov and G.W. Moore,Classification of Abelian spin Chern-Simons theories, hep-th/0505235

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[27]

Onoda,’t Hooft Line in 4D U (1) Lattice Gauge Theory and a Microscopic Description of Dyon’s Statistics,PTEP2026(2026) 013B04 [2505.05050]

S. Onoda,’t Hooft Line in 4D U (1) Lattice Gauge Theory and a Microscopic Description of Dyon’s Statistics,PTEP2026(2026) 013B04 [2505.05050]

arXiv 2026
[28]

Z. Lu, S. Seifnashri and S.-H. Shao,Lattice chiral symmetry from bosons in 3+1d, 2604.06307

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[29]

Witten,Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,Phys

E. Witten,Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,Phys. Lett. B86(1979) 283

1979
[30]

Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H.T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 125016 [2111.01139]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[31]

Kaidi, K

J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori and Y. Zheng,Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 111601 [2111.01141]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[32]

P. Niro, K. Roumpedakis and O. Sela,Exploring non-invertible symmetries in free theories, JHEP03(2023) 005 [2209.11166]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[33]

S.-H. Shao,What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics 2023: Aspects of Symmetry, 8, 2023 [2308.00747]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[34]

Aasen, R.S.K

D. Aasen, R.S.K. Mong and P. Fendley,Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model,J. Phys. A49(2016) 354001 [1601.07185]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[35]

Koide, Y

M. Koide, Y. Nagoya and S. Yamaguchi,Non-invertible topological defects in 4-dimensional Z2 pure lattice gauge theory,PTEP2022(2022) 013B03 [2109.05992]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[36]

Tambara and S

D. Tambara and S. Yamagami,Tensor Categories with Fusion Rules of Self-Duality for Finite Abelian Groups,J. Algebra209(1998) 692

1998
[37]

Gaiotto, A

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries,JHEP 02(2015) 172 [1412.5148]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[38]

Thompson,New results in topological field theory and Abelian gauge theory, inICTP Summer School in High-energy Physics and Cosmology, pp

G. Thompson,New results in topological field theory and Abelian gauge theory, inICTP Summer School in High-energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 194–255, 11, 1995 [hep-th/9511038]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[39]

Meynet, D

S. Meynet, D. Migliorati, R. Savelli and M. Tortora,Duality-Symmetry Enhancement in Maxwell Theory,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 089 [2504.20141]

arXiv 2025
[40]

Chen and A

Y.-A. Chen and A. Kapustin,Bosonization in three spatial dimensions and a 2-form gauge theory,Phys. Rev. B100(2019) 245127 [1807.07081]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[41]

N. Kan, K. Kawabata and H. Wada,Symmetry fractionalization and duality defects in Maxwell theory,JHEP10(2024) 238 [2404.14481]. – 42 –

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[42]

Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H.T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.402(2023) 489 [2204.09025]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[43]

Dempsey, I.R

R. Dempsey, I.R. Klebanov, S.S. Pufu and B. Zan,Discrete chiral symmetry and mass shift in the lattice Hamiltonian approach to the Schwinger model,Phys. Rev. Res.4(2022) 043133 [2206.05308]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[44]

S. Aoki, Y. Kikukawa and T. Takemoto,Chiral anomaly of Kogut-Susskind fermions in the (3+1)-dimensional Hamiltonian formalism,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 034514 [2511.06198]

arXiv 2026
[45]

Chen and S

Y.-A. Chen and S. Tata,Higher cup products on hypercubic lattices: Application to lattice models of topological phases,J. Math. Phys.64(2023) 091902 [2106.05274]. – 43 –

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[1] [1]

Goddard, J

P. Goddard, J. Nuyts and D.I. Olive,Gauge Theories and Magnetic Charge,Nucl. Phys. B 125(1977) 1

1977

[2] [2]

Montonen and D.I

C. Montonen and D.I. Olive,Magnetic Monopoles as Gauge Particles?,Phys. Lett. B72 (1977) 117

1977

[3] [3]

Witten and D.I

E. Witten and D.I. Olive,Supersymmetry Algebras That Include Topological Charges,Phys. Lett. B78(1978) 97. – 40 –

1978

[4] [4]

Osborn,Topological Charges for N=4 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and Monopoles of Spin 1,Phys

H. Osborn,Topological Charges for N=4 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and Monopoles of Spin 1,Phys. Lett. B83(1979) 321

1979

[5] [5]

Seiberg and E

N. Seiberg and E. Witten,Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD,Nucl. Phys. B431(1994) 484 [hep-th/9408099]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

[6] [6]

Witten,OnS-duality in Abelian gauge theory,Selecta Math.1(1995) 383 [hep-th/9505186]

E. Witten,OnS-duality in Abelian gauge theory,Selecta Math.1(1995) 383 [hep-th/9505186]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

[7] [7]

Anosova, C

M. Anosova, C. Gattringer and T. Sulejmanpasic,Self-dual U(1) lattice field theory with a θ-term,JHEP04(2022) 120 [2201.09468]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

[8] [8]

Anosova, C

M. Anosova, C. Gattringer, N. Iqbal and T. Sulejmanpasic,Phase structure of self-dual lattice gauge theories in 4d,JHEP06(2022) 149 [2203.14774]

arXiv 2022

[9] [9]

Honda and Y

M. Honda and Y. Tanizaki,Topological aspects of 4D Abelian lattice gauge theories with theθ parameter,JHEP12(2020) 154 [2009.10183]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

[10] [10]

Hayashi and Y

Y. Hayashi and Y. Tanizaki,Non-invertible self-duality defects of Cardy-Rabinovici model and mixed gravitational anomaly,JHEP08(2022) 036 [2204.07440]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

[11] [11]

Katayama and Y

N. Katayama and Y. Tanizaki,2d Cardy-Rabinovici model with the modified Villain lattice: exact dualities and symmetries,JHEP11(2025) 004 [2505.19412]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[12] [12]

S. Aoki, Y. Kikukawa and T. Takemoto,Exact SL(2,Z)-Structure of Lattice Maxwell Theory withθ-term in Modified Villain Formulation,2604.08736

Pith/arXiv arXiv

[13] [13]

Villain,Theory of one-dimensional and two-dimensional magnets with an easy magnetization plane

J. Villain,Theory of one-dimensional and two-dimensional magnets with an easy magnetization plane. 2. The Planar, classical, two-dimensional magnet,J. Phys. (France)36 (1975) 581

1975

[14] [14]

DeGrand and D

T.A. DeGrand and D. Toussaint,Topological Excitations and Monte Carlo Simulation of Abelian Gauge Theory,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 2478

1980

[15] [15]

Fazza and T

L. Fazza and T. Sulejmanpasic,Lattice quantum Villain Hamiltonians: compact scalars, U(1) gauge theories, fracton models and quantum Ising model dualities,JHEP05(2023) 017 [2211.13047]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[16] [16]

Yoneda,Equivalence of the modified Villain formulation and the dual Hamiltonian method in the duality of the XY-plaquette model,2211.01632

M. Yoneda,Equivalence of the modified Villain formulation and the dual Hamiltonian method in the duality of the XY-plaquette model,2211.01632

Pith/arXiv arXiv

[17] [17]

Jacobson and T

T. Jacobson and T. Sulejmanpasic,Canonical quantization of lattice Chern-Simons theory, JHEP11(2024) 087 [2401.09597]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[18] [18]

Ikeda,A Lattice U(1) Chern-Simons Theory via Lattice Deligne-Beilinson Cohomology, 2601.15939

Y. Ikeda,A Lattice U(1) Chern-Simons Theory via Lattice Deligne-Beilinson Cohomology, 2601.15939

arXiv

[19] [19]

Han and J.-Y

Z. Han and J.-Y. Chen,Solvable lattice Hamiltonians with fractional Hall conductivity,Phys. Rev. B105(2022) 155130 [2107.02817]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

[20] [20]

Han and J.-Y

Z. Han and J.-Y. Chen,Fractional Hall conductivity and spin-c structure in solvable lattice Hamiltonians,JHEP02(2023) 130 [2208.13785]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[21] [21]

Jacobson and T

T. Jacobson and T. Sulejmanpasic,Modified Villain formulation of Abelian Chern-Simons theory,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 125017 [2303.06160]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[22] [22]

Xu and J.-Y

Z.-A. Xu and J.-Y. Chen,Lattice Chern-Simons-Maxwell theory and its chirality,JHEP08 (2025) 062 [2410.11034]. – 41 –

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[23] [23]

DeMarco and X.-G

M. DeMarco and X.-G. Wen,CompactU k(1)Chern-Simons Theory as a Local Bosonic Lattice Model with Exact Discrete 1-Symmetries,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 021603 [1906.08270]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

[24] [24]

Peng, M.C

C. Peng, M.C. Diamantini, L. Funcke, S.M.A. Hassan, K. Jansen, S. K¨ uhn et al., Hamiltonian Lattice Formulation of Compact Maxwell-Chern-Simons Theory,2407.20225

Pith/arXiv arXiv

[25] [25]

Dijkgraaf and E

R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten,Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology,Commun. Math. Phys.129(1990) 393

1990

[26] [26]

Belov and G.W

D. Belov and G.W. Moore,Classification of Abelian spin Chern-Simons theories, hep-th/0505235

Pith/arXiv arXiv

[27] [27]

Onoda,’t Hooft Line in 4D U (1) Lattice Gauge Theory and a Microscopic Description of Dyon’s Statistics,PTEP2026(2026) 013B04 [2505.05050]

S. Onoda,’t Hooft Line in 4D U (1) Lattice Gauge Theory and a Microscopic Description of Dyon’s Statistics,PTEP2026(2026) 013B04 [2505.05050]

arXiv 2026

[28] [28]

Z. Lu, S. Seifnashri and S.-H. Shao,Lattice chiral symmetry from bosons in 3+1d, 2604.06307

Pith/arXiv arXiv

[29] [29]

Witten,Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,Phys

E. Witten,Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,Phys. Lett. B86(1979) 283

1979

[30] [30]

Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H.T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 125016 [2111.01139]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

[31] [31]

Kaidi, K

J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori and Y. Zheng,Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 111601 [2111.01141]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

[32] [32]

P. Niro, K. Roumpedakis and O. Sela,Exploring non-invertible symmetries in free theories, JHEP03(2023) 005 [2209.11166]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[33] [33]

S.-H. Shao,What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics 2023: Aspects of Symmetry, 8, 2023 [2308.00747]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[34] [34]

Aasen, R.S.K

D. Aasen, R.S.K. Mong and P. Fendley,Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model,J. Phys. A49(2016) 354001 [1601.07185]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[35] [35]

Koide, Y

M. Koide, Y. Nagoya and S. Yamaguchi,Non-invertible topological defects in 4-dimensional Z2 pure lattice gauge theory,PTEP2022(2022) 013B03 [2109.05992]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

[36] [36]

Tambara and S

D. Tambara and S. Yamagami,Tensor Categories with Fusion Rules of Self-Duality for Finite Abelian Groups,J. Algebra209(1998) 692

1998

[37] [37]

Gaiotto, A

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries,JHEP 02(2015) 172 [1412.5148]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[38] [38]

Thompson,New results in topological field theory and Abelian gauge theory, inICTP Summer School in High-energy Physics and Cosmology, pp

G. Thompson,New results in topological field theory and Abelian gauge theory, inICTP Summer School in High-energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 194–255, 11, 1995 [hep-th/9511038]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

[39] [39]

Meynet, D

S. Meynet, D. Migliorati, R. Savelli and M. Tortora,Duality-Symmetry Enhancement in Maxwell Theory,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 089 [2504.20141]

arXiv 2025

[40] [40]

Chen and A

Y.-A. Chen and A. Kapustin,Bosonization in three spatial dimensions and a 2-form gauge theory,Phys. Rev. B100(2019) 245127 [1807.07081]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[41] [41]

N. Kan, K. Kawabata and H. Wada,Symmetry fractionalization and duality defects in Maxwell theory,JHEP10(2024) 238 [2404.14481]. – 42 –

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[42] [42]

Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H.T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.402(2023) 489 [2204.09025]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[43] [43]

Dempsey, I.R

R. Dempsey, I.R. Klebanov, S.S. Pufu and B. Zan,Discrete chiral symmetry and mass shift in the lattice Hamiltonian approach to the Schwinger model,Phys. Rev. Res.4(2022) 043133 [2206.05308]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

[44] [44]

S. Aoki, Y. Kikukawa and T. Takemoto,Chiral anomaly of Kogut-Susskind fermions in the (3+1)-dimensional Hamiltonian formalism,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 034514 [2511.06198]

arXiv 2026

[45] [45]

Chen and S

Y.-A. Chen and S. Tata,Higher cup products on hypercubic lattices: Application to lattice models of topological phases,J. Math. Phys.64(2023) 091902 [2106.05274]. – 43 –

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023