Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 123 references

Fairness in Computational Innovations: Identifying Bias in Substance Use Treatment Length of Stay Prediction Models with Policy Implications

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that machine learning models predicting substance use treatment length of stay systematically under-select Alaska Native, self-pay, and cannabis-abuse patients for longer stays, framing these disparities as unfairness…

desk verdict Competent, reproducible fairness audit of SUD length-of-stay predictions, but the headline claim of unfairness rests on demographic-parity ratios that are never benchmarked against actual long-stay rates. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05832 v1 pith:U6NFNIDX submitted 2024-12-08 cs.CY cs.HC

Ugur Kursuncu , Aaron Baird , Yusen Xia This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CYcs.HC
keywords algorithmicfairnesssubstanceusedisorderlengthofstaydemographicparityhealthdisparitiesmachinelearningTEDS-Dpolicymitigation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using 2019 national U.S. treatment discharge records, the paper builds machine learning classifiers that predict whether a substance use disorder patient will have a long stay (more than 30 days inpatient or more than 90 days outpatient). It then audits these models for fairness and claims that race, U.S. region, primary substance, diagnosis, and payment source are the main sources of unfairness. The paper argues that groups such as Alaska Native patients, patients paying out of pocket or without insurance, and patients with cannabis abuse diagnoses are systematically under-predicted for longer stays, which could lead to premature discharge and worse recovery. If correct, this would mean that deploying such models without mitigation could encode existing health disparities into discharge decisions.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the binary length-of-stay classification task (long stay defined as over 30 days inpatient or over 90 days outpatient) paired with group and subgroup fairness metrics computed with FairLearn: selection rate, demographic parity ratio (with the 80 percent disparate impact threshold), equalized odds difference, and false positive/negative rate differences. Feature selection uses a majority vote across LASSO, decision tree, random forest, and XGBoost to choose 28 variables; the fairness audit then compares subgroup selection rates and identifies those below 80 percent of the highest rate as disadvantaged.

What would settle it

Compare the models' predicted long-stay rates against actual clinically indicated stays and post-discharge outcomes (e.g., readmission within 90 days) for each subgroup. If under-selected groups show no higher readmission or relapse, and if adjusting for measured clinical need removes the demographic parity gaps, the claim that these disparities constitute unfairness would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that two well-performing classifiers (random forest and LightGBM) trained on the 2019 TEDS-D data produce large and systematic differences in the rate at which they predict long-term stays across demographic, medical, and financial groups. For inpatient race, the demographic parity ratio falls to 0.19 (random forest), and subgroup selection rates span from 0.17 for Alaska Native patients to 0.83 for Asian/Pacific Islander patients. The authors interpret these disparities as unfairness under distributive justice and socio-relational fairness, arguing they would deny adequate treatment duration to vulnerable groups.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that selection-rate parity is the correct fairness standard for length-of-stay predictions, so that a group whose predicted long-stay rate is below 80 percent of the highest group's rate is being unfairly treated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If deployed without mitigation, these models would systematically recommend shorter stays for already-marginalized groups, potentially increasing relapse risk.
  • The identified variables (race, region, substance, diagnosis, payment) should be monitored in any length-of-stay prediction model used for substance use disorder discharge decisions.
  • The paper's group-level and subgroup-level audit procedure can be adapted to other treatment settings and other resource-allocation decisions.
  • Mitigation strategies, from data reweighting to threshold adjustment, are proposed to bring selection-rate parity within the 80 percent guideline.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is to check whether under-selected groups actually have higher readmission or relapse rates when discharged earlier; if not, the parity gap may reflect clinically appropriate shorter stays rather than bias.
  • The paper's reliance on demographic parity alone leaves open the possibility that adjusting for clinical need (diagnosis, severity, co-occurring conditions) would shrink or eliminate the disparities; such a risk-adjusted audit is a testable extension.
  • The regional disparities suggest that a single national model may be less fair than regionally tuned models; evaluating fairness after fine-tuning on local data is a concrete follow-up.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops machine learning classifiers to predict binarized length of stay (LOS) for inpatient (>30 days) and outpatient (>90 days) substance use disorder (SUD) treatment using the 2019 TEDS-D dataset. After feature selection by majority vote and training random forest, LightGBM, XGBoost, and TabNet, the authors assess fairness with FairLearn metrics (selection rate, demographic parity ratio, equalized odds difference, false positive/negative rate differences). They report that race, U.S. region, substance use at discharge, SUD diagnosis, and payment source exhibit the largest demographic parity violations, identify specific subgroups with demographic parity ratios below 0.80, and propose model-adjustment and policy mitigation strategies. The central claim is that the observed selection-rate disparities constitute model bias with implications for discharge decisions and health equity.

Significance. The topic is timely and relevant: predictive models for SUD treatment LOS are an underexplored fairness domain, and the paper uses a large nationwide public dataset with a transparent pipeline. The authors are to be credited for using standard tools (FairLearn), reporting group- and subgroup-level metrics, and connecting their results to distributive-justice and socio-relational framing. The study also makes falsifiable, concrete claims about specific subgroups (e.g., Alaska Native, barbiturate users, self-pay patients). However, the central inference from selection-rate disparity to unfairness is not yet supported. The analysis never compares model selection rates to actual long-stay rates by subgroup, nor does it condition on clinical need, despite the paper's own acknowledgement that need-based differences are acceptable. If the authors add the missing baseline comparisons and uncertainty quantification, the paper could become a useful fairness audit; in its current form, the evidence for the headline claim is incomplete.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.4 and Appendix D (Tables D2–D12)] The central claim that race, U.S. region, substance use, diagnosis, and payment source are “primary indicators of unfairness” is not supported because the demographic parity ratios are never benchmarked against actual long-stay rates by subgroup. A well-calibrated model will produce DPR values below 0.80 whenever subgroup base rates differ, and Section 2.2 explicitly allows differences in resource use based on medical needs. The manuscript should report the actual (ground-truth) long-stay prevalence for each subgroup, compare predicted selection rates to those base rates, and ideally show that the disparities persist after conditioning on clinical need or after calibration. Without such a baseline, the reported DPR values (e.g., 0.19 for inpatient race under random forest in Table 3) do not by themselves demonstrate model-introduced bias.
  2. [Section 4.3 and Appendix D] Several subgroups identified as “disadvantaged” have very small sample sizes: e.g., Attention Deficit/disruptive behavior disorders (n=31, Table D2), Asian/Pacific Islander inpatient (n=502, Table D4), barbiturates outpatient (n=721, Table D9), and U.S. territories inpatient (n=352, Table D8). The reported selection rates are point estimates without confidence intervals, and the min/max demographic parity ratio is highly sensitive to small denominators. The claim that these small subgroups are underserved needs uncertainty quantification, such as bootstrap confidence intervals, or smoothing/empirical Bayes shrinkage, before policy conclusions are drawn.
  3. [Section 3.4 and Appendix C (Eq. C1)] The definition of selection rate is internally inconsistent. The text says selection rate is “the ratio of predicted positive outcomes to ground truth positive outcomes,” but Eq. (C1) computes (TP+FP)/(P+N), which is the predicted positive rate. The results in Tables 3–4 and Appendix D are consistent with the formula, not with the textual definition. This needs to be corrected, because the “ratio to ground truth” wording implies a comparison to actual rates that is never performed; the actual ground-truth positive rates are not reported anywhere.
  4. [Sections 3.1.2 and 3.4] The identification of disadvantaged subgroups is conditional on two imported thresholds: the LOS binarization thresholds (>30 days inpatient, >90 days outpatient) and the 0.80 demographic parity ratio rule. Neither choice is subjected to sensitivity analysis. The LOS thresholds are based on prior work and a partner provider, and the 80% rule is borrowed from employment disparate-impact guidance. A robustness check varying the LOS thresholds and the DPR threshold would clarify whether the main findings are stable or artifacts of these choices.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3.4] The phrase “ratio of predicted positive outcomes to ground truth positive outcomes” should be replaced with “predicted positive rate” (or the metric should be redefined accordingly) to match the actual computation.
  2. [Table 2] Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 are reported to only two decimal places, so the differences between random forest and LightGBM are not visible (both show 0.81/0.77 or 0.81/0.76). Reporting additional digits or other metrics would make the model-selection step more transparent.
  3. [Figures 2 and 3] The red (and green) dots are described as outliers, but the colors appear to be assigned by the 0.80 demographic parity threshold, not by a statistical outlier rule. Please clarify the criterion used to mark these points.
  4. [Section 5.2] The text states that “the subgroups identified by Asian/Pacific Islander, Native Americans, and multiple racial backgrounds show the lowest selection rates,” but Appendix Table D4 shows Alaska Native with the lowest selection rate for inpatients. Please make the summary consistent with the appendix tables.
  5. [Section 3.1.2] The optimal LOS thresholds are said to be determined in consultation with prior literature and “a partner SUD treatment provider.” If the provider input influenced the threshold choice, more detail should be provided; otherwise the reliance on an unnamed partner should be disclosed or removed.
  6. [References] Several reference entries contain formatting artifacts (e.g., “e.a.” instead of “et al.”) and missing page numbers; please clean up the bibliography.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the fairness assessment is a standard operationalization, with only a minor self-citation in the choice of LOS thresholds.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: TEDS-D features -> trained classifiers -> predicted labels -> FairLearn selection rates and demographic parity ratios -> flagging variables/subgroups with DPR below the 0.80 rule. The conclusion that race, region, diagnosis, substance use, and payment source are 'primary indicators of unfairness' is the direct reading of the computed DPR values; it is an operationalization of a fairness metric, not a derivation that reduces to its own input. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: the models are selected on accuracy/F1 and fairness is then evaluated on holdout predictions. The only notable self-citation is in Section 3.1.2, where the LOS thresholds (>90 days outpatient, >30 days inpatient) are justified by 'Baird et al., 2023' among other external sources (CDC, NIDA, Mennis & Stahler) and a partner provider; because the threshold is an input assumption and is not itself derived from the fairness analysis, this is a minor self-citation, not a load-bearing circular step. The absence of a comparison between predicted selection rates and actual long-stay rates, and the unadjusted application of demographic parity despite the paper's own statement in Section 2.2 that need-based differences are acceptable, is a validity limitation rather than a circularity, since no equation in the paper makes the claimed unfairness equivalent to the inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on a small number of hand-chosen thresholds and domain assumptions about what counts as good treatment and fair prediction. No new entities are introduced. The main burden is the normative commitment to selection-rate parity as the fairness standard.

free parameters (3)
  • LOS binarization thresholds = >90 days outpatient, >30 days inpatient
    The target variable is defined by these hand-chosen thresholds, taken from prior literature and a partner provider. Fairness results would change under different thresholds; no sensitivity analysis is reported.
  • Demographic parity ratio threshold = 0.80
    Subgroups are flagged as disadvantaged when their selection rate falls below 80 percent of the highest rate, following an external EEOC guideline. This binary flag drives the summary of primary indicators of unfairness.
  • Feature selection majority vote threshold = selected by at least 3 of 4 algorithms
    Variables are included only if selected by at least three of four feature selectors. This arbitrary rule shapes the model inputs and thus the fairness metrics.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Longer length of stay (over 30 days inpatient, over 90 days outpatient) is associated with better SUD treatment outcomes, so longer stays are the positive class.
    Invoked in Section 3.1.2 to define the binary target. The paper cites literature and a partner provider, but the equivalence of longer stay with better outcome is not demonstrated in this dataset.
  • domain assumption Demographic parity of selection rates is an appropriate fairness criterion for LOS prediction, and the 80 percent ratio rule identifies unfairness.
    Invoked in Section 3.4. The paper does not justify why equal selection rates are required when clinical need and base rates may differ across groups.
  • domain assumption The model's predicted selection rate is a meaningful proxy for the treatment duration patients would receive.
    The fairness analysis interprets low predicted selection rates as risk of premature discharge, but the models are not deployed in the paper and no link to actual discharge decisions is established.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fairness in Computational Innovations: Identifying Bias in Substance Use Treatment Length of Stay Prediction Models with Policy Implications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U6NFNIDX

@misc{pith2026241205832,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fairness in Computational Innovations: Identifying Bias in Substance Use Treatment Length of Stay Prediction Models with Policy Implications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U6NFNIDX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05832}
}
read the original abstract

Predictive machine learning (ML) models are computational innovations that can enhance medical decision-making, including aiding in determining optimal timing for discharging patients. However, societal biases can be encoded into such models, raising concerns about inadvertently affecting health outcomes for disadvantaged groups. This issue is particularly pressing in the context of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, where biases in predictive models could significantly impact the recovery of highly vulnerable patients. In this study, we focus on the development and assessment of ML models designed to predict the length of stay (LOS) for both inpatients (i.e., residential) and outpatients undergoing SUD treatment. We utilize the Treatment Episode Data Set for Discharges (TEDS-D) from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Through the lenses of distributive justice and socio-relational fairness, we assess our models for bias across variables related to demographics (e.g., race) as well as medical (e.g., diagnosis) and financial conditions (e.g., insurance). We find that race, US geographic region, type of substance used, diagnosis, and payment source for treatment are primary indicators of unfairness. From a policy perspective, we provide bias mitigation strategies to achieve fair outcomes. We discuss the implications of these findings for medical decision-making and health equity. We ultimately seek to contribute to the innovation and policy-making literature by seeking to advance the broader objectives of social justice when applying computational innovations in health care.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    afshar2022smartai APACrefauthors Afshar, M. \ . APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Development and Multimodal Validation of a Substance Misuse Algorithm for Referral to Treatment Using Artificial Intelligence (SMART-AI): A Retrospective Deep Learning Study Development and multimodal validation of a substance misuse algorithm for referral to treatment using artificia...

    2022

  2. [2]

    APACrefauthors \ 1999

    anderson1999point APACrefauthors Anderson, E.S. APACrefauthors \ 1999 . What is the Point of Equality? What is the point of equality? Ethics 109 2 287--337,

    1999

  3. [3]

    arik2021tabnet APACrefauthors Arik, S. \"O . \ Pfister, T. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Tabnet: Attentive interpretable tabular learning Tabnet: Attentive interpretable tabular learning . Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence Proceedings of the aaai conference on artificial intelligence \ ( 35, \ 6679--6687)

    2021

  4. [4]

    , Cheng, Y

    baird2022machine APACrefauthors Baird, A. , Cheng, Y. Xia, Y. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Use of Machine Learning to Examine Disparities in Completion of Substance Use Disorder Treatment Use of machine learning to examine disparities in completion of substance use disorder treatment . PloS One 17 9 e0275054,

    2022

  5. [5]

    , Cheng, Y

    baird2023determinants APACrefauthors Baird, A. , Cheng, Y. Xia, Y. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Determinants of Outpatient Substance Use Disorder Treatment Length-of-Stay and Completion: The Case of a Treatment Program in the Southeast US Determinants of outpatient substance use disorder treatment length-of-stay and completion: The case of a treatment program ...

    2023

  6. [6]

    \ Selbst, A.D

    barocas2016disparate APACrefauthors Barocas, S. \ Selbst, A.D. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Big Data's Disparate Impact Big data's disparate impact . Calif. L. Rev. 104 671,

    2016

  7. [7]

    , Chan, C

    bartel2020hospitals APACrefauthors Bartel, A.P. , Chan, C. Kim, S. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Should Hospitals Keep Their Patients Longer? The Role of Inpatient Care in Reducing Postdischarge Mortality Should hospitals keep their patients longer? the role of inpatient care in reducing postdischarge mortality . Management Science 66 6 2326--2346,

    2020

  8. [8]

    \ Hazzab, A

    belderrar2020application APACrefauthors Belderrar, A. \ Hazzab, A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Application of a hybrid data mining model to identify the main predictive factors influencing hospital length of stay Application of a hybrid data mining model to identify the main predictive factors influencing hospital length of stay . International Journal of Bus...

    2020

Show all 123 references
  1. [9]

    , Ross, P

    bertl2023ai APACrefauthors Bertl, M. , Ross, P. Draheim, D. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Systematic AI Support for Decision-Making in the Healthcare Sector: Obstacles and Success Factors Systematic ai support for decision-making in the healthcare sector: Obstacles and success facto...

    2023

  2. [10]

    APACrefauthors \ 2018

    binns2018fairness APACrefauthors Binns, R. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy . Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency Conference on fairness, ...

    2018

  3. [11]

    , Dudík, M

    bird2020fairlearn APACrefauthors Bird, S. , Dudík, M. , Edgar, R. \ . APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Fairlearn: A Toolkit for Assessing and Improving Fairness in AI Fairlearn: A toolkit for assessing and improving fairness in ai \ \ \ MSR-TR-2020-32 . Microsoft

    2020

  4. [12]

    , Leemann, T

    borisov2021deep APACrefauthors Borisov, V. , Leemann, T. , Seßler, K. , Haug, J. , Pawelczyk, M. Kasneci, G. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey Deep neural networks and tabular data: A survey . IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learn...

    2021

  5. [13]

    , Crupi, R

    castelnovo2022fairness APACrefauthors Castelnovo, A. , Crupi, R. , Greco, G. \ . APACrefauthors \ 2022 . A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscape A clarification of the nuances in the fairness metrics landscape . Scientific Reports 12 1 4209,

    2022

  6. [14]

    APACrefauthors \ 2017

    cdc2017health APACrefauthors CDC, C.f.D.C.P. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Health, United States, 2016, with Chartbook on Long-Term Trends in Health Health, united states, 2016, with chartbook on long-term trends in health . National Center for Health Statistics ,

    2017

  7. [15]

    chen2021ethical APACrefauthors Chen, I.Y. \ . APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Ethical Machine Learning in Healthcare Ethical machine learning in healthcare . Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science 4 123--144,

    2021

  8. [16]

    \ Guestrin, C

    chen2016xgboost APACrefauthors Chen, T. \ Guestrin, C. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system . Proceedings of the 22nd ACM sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining Proceedings of ...

    2016

  9. [17]

    \ Roth, A

    chouldechova2020snapshot APACrefauthors Chouldechova, A. \ Roth, A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . A Snapshot of the Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learning A snapshot of the frontiers of fairness in machine learning . Communications of the ACM 63 5 82--89,

    2020

  10. [18]

    \ Hilton, T.L

    cleary1968item APACrefauthors Cleary, T.A. \ Hilton, T.L. APACrefauthors \ 1968 . An Investigation of Item Bias An investigation of item bias . Educational and Psychological Measurement 28 1 61--75,

    1968

  11. [19]

    delphin2012racial APACrefauthors Delphin-Rittmon, M. \ . APACrefauthors \ 2012 . Racial-ethnic Differences in Referral Source, Diagnosis, and Length of Stay in Inpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Racial-ethnic differences in referral source, diagnosis, and length of stay in in...

    2012

  12. [20]

    , Chaparro, X.A.F

    devasconcelos2025failure APACrefauthors de Vasconcelos Gomes, L.A. , Chaparro, X.A.F. , Maniçoba, R.F. , Borini, F.M. Silva, L.E. APACrefauthors \ 2025 . Transformation of the Governance of Failure for Radical Innovation: The Role of Strategic Leaders Transformation of the gov...

    2025

  13. [21]

    , Feuerriegel, S

    dearteaga2022fairness APACrefauthors De‐Arteaga, M. , Feuerriegel, S. Saar‐Tsechansky, M. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Algorithmic Fairness in Business Analytics: Directions for Research and Practice Algorithmic fairness in business analytics: Directions for research and practice ....

    2022

  14. [22]

    , Mingardi, L

    dunn2021feature APACrefauthors Dunn, J. , Mingardi, L. Zhuo, Y.D. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Comparing Interpretability and Explainability for Feature Selection Comparing interpretability and explainability for feature selection . arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.05328 ,

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    APACrefauthors \ 2002

    dworkin2002sovereign APACrefauthors Dworkin, R. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality . Harvard University Press

    2002

  16. [24]

    emanuel2020allocation APACrefauthors Emanuel, E.J. \ . APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19 Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of covid-19 . New England Journal of Medicine 382 21 2049--2055,

    2020

  17. [25]

    Un” Fair Machine Learning Algorithms “un

    fu2022unfair APACrefauthors Fu, R. , Aseri, M. , Singh, P.V. Srinivasan, K. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . “Un” Fair Machine Learning Algorithms “un” fair machine learning algorithms . Management Science 68 6 4173--4195,

    2022

  18. [26]

    , Huang, Y

    fu2021crowds APACrefauthors Fu, R. , Huang, Y. Singh, P.V. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Crowds, Lending, Machine, and Bias Crowds, lending, machine, and bias . Information Systems Research 32 1 72--92,

    2021

  19. [27]

    , Ahern, J

    galea2007poverty APACrefauthors Galea, S. , Ahern, J. , Nandi, A. , Tracy, M. , Beard, J. Vlahov, D. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Urban Neighborhood Poverty and the Incidence of Depression in a Population-based Cohort Study Urban neighborhood poverty and the incidence of depression...

    2007

  20. [28]

    , Atasoy, H

    ganju2020role APACrefauthors Ganju, K.K. , Atasoy, H. , McCullough, J. Greenwood, B. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . The Role of Decision Support Systems in Attenuating Racial Biases in Health Care Delivery The role of decision support systems in attenuating racial biases in health ca...

    2020

  21. [29]

    ghosh2022diversity APACrefauthors Ghosh, A.K. \ . APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Association Between Patient Diversity in Hospitals and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Patient Length of Stay Association between patient diversity in hospitals and racial/ethnic differences in patient leng...

    2022

  22. [30]

    APACrefauthors \ 1912

    gini1971variability APACrefauthors Gini, C.W. APACrefauthors \ 1912 . Variability and mutability, contribution to the study of statistical distributions and relations Variability and mutability, contribution to the study of statistical distributions and relations . Studi Econo...

    1912

  23. [31]

    \ Tiribelli, S

    giovanola2023fairness APACrefauthors Giovanola, B. \ Tiribelli, S. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Beyond Bias and Discrimination: Redefining the AI Ethics Principle of Fairness in Healthcare Machine-Learning Algorithms Beyond bias and discrimination: Redefining the ai ethics principl...

    2023

  24. [32]

    APACrefauthors \ 1989

    goldberg1989genetic APACrefauthors Goldberg, D.E. APACrefauthors \ 1989 . Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning . Addison-Wesley

    1989

  25. [33]

    \ Savona, M

    goos2024governance APACrefauthors Goos, M. \ Savona, M. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . The Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Harnessing Opportunities and Mitigating Challenges The governance of artificial intelligence: Harnessing opportunities and mitigating challenges . Researc...

    2024

  26. [34]

    , Oyallon, E

    grinsztajn2022tree APACrefauthors Grinsztajn, L. , Oyallon, E. Varoquaux, G. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Why Do Tree-based Models Still Outperform Deep Learning on Tabular Data? Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data? NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks ,

    2022

  27. [35]

    \ Martin, B.R

    hall2019taxonomy APACrefauthors Hall, J. \ Martin, B.R. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Towards a Taxonomy of Research Misconduct: The Case of Business School Research Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research . Research Policy 48 2 414--427,

    2019

  28. [36]

    , Price, E

    hardt2016equality APACrefauthors Hardt, M. , Price, E. Srebro, N. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning Equality of opportunity in supervised learning . Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Advances in neural information processing...

    2016

  29. [37]

    , Pfaff, E

    he2023realworld APACrefauthors He, Z. , Pfaff, E. , Guo, S.J. , Guo, Y. , Wu, Y. , Tao, C. Bian, J. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Enriching Real-world Data with Social Determinants of Health for Health Outcomes and Health Equity: Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities Enriching re...

    2023

  30. [38]

    \ Neumark, D

    holzer2000affirmative APACrefauthors Holzer, H. \ Neumark, D. APACrefauthors \ 2000 . Assessing Affirmative Action Assessing affirmative action . Journal of Economic Literature 38 3 483--568,

    2000

  31. [39]

    , Marsden, E

    hubbard1989treatment APACrefauthors Hubbard, L. , Marsden, E. Racholl, V. APACrefauthors \ 1989 . Drug Abuse Treatment Drug abuse treatment . Chapel Hill, NC ,

    1989

  32. [40]

    \ Mitchell, M

    hutchinson2019test APACrefauthors Hutchinson, B. \ Mitchell, M. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . 50 Years of Test (Un) Fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning 50 years of test (un) fairness: Lessons for machine learning . Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Tr...

    2019

  33. [41]

    , Kondrich, A.A

    irvin2020machine APACrefauthors Irvin, J.A. , Kondrich, A.A. , Ko, M. , Rajpurkar, P. , Haghgoo, B. , Landon, B.E. Basu, S. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Incorporating Machine Learning and Social Determinants of Health Indicators into Prospective Risk Adjustment for Health Plan Paym...

    2020

  34. [42]

    , Cardon, D

    johnmathews2022reality APACrefauthors John-Mathews, J.M. , Cardon, D. Balagué, C. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . From Reality to World: A Critical Perspective on AI Fairness From reality to world: A critical perspective on ai fairness . Journal of Business Ethics 178 945--959,

    2022

  35. [43]

    \ Sharda, R

    kalgotra2021hospital APACrefauthors Kalgotra, P. \ Sharda, R. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . When Will I Get Out of the Hospital? Modeling Length of Stay Using Comorbidity Networks When will i get out of the hospital? modeling length of stay using comorbidity networks . Journal of Ma...

    2021

  36. [44]

    , Mao, X

    kallus2022algorithmic APACrefauthors Kallus, N. , Mao, X. Zhou, A. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combination Assessing algorithmic fairness with unobserved protected class using data combination . Management S...

    2022

  37. [45]

    \ Calders, T

    kamiran2012classification APACrefauthors Kamiran, F. \ Calders, T. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . Data Preprocessing Techniques for Classification Without Discrimination Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination . Knowledge and Information Systems 33 1 1--33,

    2012

  38. [46]

    , Meng, Q

    ke2017lightgbm APACrefauthors Ke, G. , Meng, Q. , Finley, T. , Wang, T. , Chen, W. , Ma, W. Liu, T Y. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree . Advances in neural informat...

    2017

  39. [47]

    , Zare, Z

    khosravi2024decisionmaking APACrefauthors Khosravi, M. , Zare, Z. , Mojtabaeian, S.M. Izadi, R. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Artificial Intelligence and Decision-making in Healthcare: A Thematic Analysis of a Systematic Review of Reviews Artificial intelligence and decision-making ...

    2024

  40. [48]

    APACrefauthors \ 2022

    kong2022opioid APACrefauthors Kong, e.a., Y. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Using Machine Learning to Advance Disparities Research: Subgroup Analyses of Access to Opioid Treatment Using machine learning to advance disparities research: Subgroup analyses of access to opioid treatment ...

    2022

  41. [49]

    , Stegmaier, P

    kuhlmann2019tentative APACrefauthors Kuhlmann, S. , Stegmaier, P. Konrad, K. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . The Tentative Governance of Emerging Science and Technology—A Conceptual Introduction The tentative governance of emerging science and technology—a conceptual introduction . Re...

    2019

  42. [50]

    , Gaur, M

    kursuncu2018s APACrefauthors Kursuncu, U. , Gaur, M. , Lokala, U. , Illendula, A. , Thirunarayan, K. , Daniulaityte, R. Arpinar, I.B. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . What's ur type? Contextualized classification of user types in marijuana-related communications using compositional mul...

    2018

  43. [51]

    , Gaur, M

    kursuncu2019knowledge APACrefauthors Kursuncu, U. , Gaur, M. Sheth, A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Knowledge infused learning (k-il): Towards deep incorporation of knowledge in deep learning Knowledge infused learning (k-il): Towards deep incorporation of knowledge in deep learnin...

    2020

  44. [52]

    \ Behrend, T.S

    landers2023auditing APACrefauthors Landers, R.N. \ Behrend, T.S. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Auditing the AI Auditors: A Framework for Evaluating Fairness and Bias in High Stakes AI Predictive Models Auditing the ai auditors: A framework for evaluating fairness and bias in high st...

    2023

  45. [53]

    , Torous, J

    lee2021mental APACrefauthors Lee, E.E. , Torous, J. , De Choudhury, M. , Depp, C.A. , Graham, S.A. , Kim, H.C. Jeste, D.V. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health Care: Clinical Applications, Barriers, Facilitators, and Artificial Wisdom Artificial in...

    2021

  46. [54]

    , Cheng, K

    li2017feature APACrefauthors Li, J. , Cheng, K. , Wang, S. , Morstatter, F. , Trevino, R.P. , Tang, J. Liu, H. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Feature Selection: A Data Perspective Feature selection: A data perspective . ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 50 6 1--45,

    2017

  47. [55]

    \ Setiono, R

    liu1995chi2 APACrefauthors Liu, H. \ Setiono, R. APACrefauthors \ 1995 . Chi2: Feature selection and discretization of numeric attributes Chi2: Feature selection and discretization of numeric attributes . Proceedings of 7th IEEE international conference on tools with artificia...

    1995

  48. [56]

    , Lamy, F

    lokala2022drug APACrefauthors Lokala, U. , Lamy, F. , Daniulaityte, R. , Gaur, M. , Gyrard, A. , Thirunarayan, K. Sheth, A. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Drug abuse ontology to harness web-based data for substance use epidemiology research: ontology development study Drug abuse onto...

    2022

  49. [57]

    , Joshi, S

    mccradden2020ethical APACrefauthors McCradden, M.D. , Joshi, S. , Mazwi, M. Anderson, J.A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Ethical Limitations of Algorithmic Fairness Solutions in Health Care Machine Learning Ethical limitations of algorithmic fairness solutions in health care machine...

    2020

  50. [58]

    APACrefauthors \ 2021

    mehrabi2021bias APACrefauthors Mehrabi, e.a., N. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning . ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54 6 1--35,

    2021

  51. [59]

    \ Stahler, G.J

    mennis2016racial APACrefauthors Mennis, J. \ Stahler, G.J. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Outpatient Substance Use Disorder Treatment Episode Completion for Different Substances Racial and ethnic disparities in outpatient substance use disorder treatm...

    2016

  52. [60]

    , Stahler, G.J

    mennis2019treatment APACrefauthors Mennis, J. , Stahler, G.J. , Abou El Magd, S. Baron, D.A. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . How Long Does It Take to Complete Outpatient Substance Use Disorder Treatment? Disparities Among Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites in the US How long does it take t...

    2019

  53. [61]

    APACrefauthors \ 2021

    moreno2021explainability APACrefauthors Moreno-Sanchez, P.A. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . An Automated Feature Selection and Classification Pipeline to Improve Explainability of Clinical Prediction Models An automated feature selection and classification pipeline to improve explain...

    2021

  54. [62]

    APACrefauthors \ 2020

    morley2020ethics APACrefauthors Morley, J. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . The Ethics of AI in Health Care: A Mapping Review The ethics of ai in health care: A mapping review . Social Science & Medicine 260 113172,

    2020

  55. [63]

    APACrefauthors \ 2021

    nasir2021outcome APACrefauthors Nasir, e.a., M. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Machine Learning–Based Outcome Prediction and Novel Hypotheses Generation for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Machine learning–based outcome prediction and novel hypotheses generation for substance use di...

    2021

  56. [64]

    \ Srinivasan, S

    ndanga2019hospitalization APACrefauthors Ndanga, M. \ Srinivasan, S. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Analysis of Hospitalization Length of Stay and Total Charges for Patients with Drug Abuse Comorbidity Analysis of hospitalization length of stay and total charges for patients with dru...

    2019

  57. [65]

    APACrefauthors \ 2014

    nida2014principles APACrefauthors NIDA, N.I.o.D.A. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research-based Guide Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide . NIDA ,

    2014

  58. [66]

    APACrefauthors \ 2019

    nordling2019fairer APACrefauthors Nordling, L. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . A Fairer Way Forward for AI in Health Care A fairer way forward for ai in health care . Nature 573 7775 S103--S103,

    2019

  59. [67]

    , Powers, B

    obermeyer2019dissecting APACrefauthors Obermeyer, Z. , Powers, B. , Vogeli, C. Mullainathan, S. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populatio...

    2019

  60. [68]

    APACrefauthors \ 2011

    olsen2011equity APACrefauthors Olsen, J.A. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . Concepts of Equity and Fairness in Health and Health Care Concepts of equity and fairness in health and health care . The Oxford Handbook of Health Economics , APACrefURL https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/978019...

    2011

  61. [69]

    , Pansera, M

    owen2021organisational APACrefauthors Owen, R. , Pansera, M. , Macnaghten, P. Randles, S. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Organisational institutionalisation of responsible innovation Organisational institutionalisation of responsible innovation . Research Policy 50 1 104132,

    2021

  62. [70]

    \ Ellwood, P

    pandza2013strategic APACrefauthors Pandza, K. \ Ellwood, P. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation . Research Policy 42 5 1112--1125,

    2013

  63. [71]

    , Teeple, S

    parikh2019bias APACrefauthors Parikh, R.B. , Teeple, S. Navathe, A.S. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Addressing Bias in Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Addressing bias in artificial intelligence in health care . JAMA 322 24 2377--2378,

    2019

  64. [72]

    \ Kent, D.M

    paulus2020predictably APACrefauthors Paulus, J.K. \ Kent, D.M. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Predictably Unequal: Understanding and Addressing Concerns that Algorithmic Clinical Prediction May Increase Health Disparities Predictably unequal: Understanding and addressing concerns tha...

    2020

  65. [73]

    Enough,”“Enough

    proctor2014continuing APACrefauthors Proctor, S.L. \ Herschman, P.L. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . The Continuing Care Model of Substance Use Treatment: What Works, and When is “Enough,”“Enough”? The continuing care model of substance use treatment: What works, and when is “enough,”...

    2014

  66. [74]

    APACrefauthors \ 2018

    rajkomar2018fairness APACrefauthors Rajkomar, e.a., A. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning to Advance Health Equity Ensuring fairness in machine learning to advance health equity . Annals of Internal Medicine 169 12 866--872,

    2018

  67. [75]

    APACrefauthors \ 1971

    rawls1971justice APACrefauthors Rawls, J. APACrefauthors \ 1971 . A Theory of Justice A theory of justice . Cambridge (Mass.)

    1971

  68. [76]

    APACrefauthors \ 2021

    rea2021unequal APACrefauthors Rea, e.a., D. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Unequal but Fair: Incorporating Distributive Justice in Operational Allocation Models Unequal but fair: Incorporating distributive justice in operational allocation models . Production and Operations Managemen...

    2021

  69. [77]

    , Allan, S

    reddy2020governance APACrefauthors Reddy, S. , Allan, S. , Coghlan, S. Cooper, P. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . A Governance Model for the Application of AI in Health Care A governance model for the application of ai in health care . Journal of the American Medical Informatics Assoc...

    2020

  70. [78]

    \ Choo, E.K

    riddick2022nlp APACrefauthors Riddick, T.A. \ Choo, E.K. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Natural Language Processing to Identify Substance Misuse in the Electronic Health Record Natural language processing to identify substance misuse in the electronic health record . The Lancet Digit...

    2022

  71. [79]

    APACrefauthors \ 2010

    rotter2010pathways APACrefauthors Rotter, e.a., T. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Clinical Pathways: Effects on Professional Practice, Patient Outcomes, Length of Stay and Hospital Costs Clinical pathways: Effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospita...

    2010

  72. [80]

    , Porumbescu, G

    ruijer2023equity APACrefauthors Ruijer, E. , Porumbescu, G. , Porter, R. Piotrowski, S. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Social Equity in the Data Era: A Systematic Literature Review of Data‐Driven Public Service Research Social equity in the data era: A systematic literature review of...

    2023

  73. [81]

    , Inza, I

    saeys2007review APACrefauthors Saeys, Y. , Inza, I. Larranaga, P. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics . Bioinformatics 23 19 2507--2517,

    2007

  74. [82]

    APACrefauthors \ 2024

    samhsa2024equity APACrefauthors SAMHSA, S.A.M.H.S.A. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Behavioral Health Equity. Behavioral health equity. APACrefURL https://www.samhsa.gov/behavioral-health-equity APACrefURL

    2024

  75. [83]

    APACrefauthors \ 2021

    samorani2021overbooked APACrefauthors Samorani, e.a., M. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Overbooked and Overlooked: Machine Learning and Racial Bias in Medical Appointment Scheduling Overbooked and overlooked: Machine learning and racial bias in medical appointment scheduling . Manufa...

    2021

  76. [84]

    APACrefauthors \ 2017

    scheffler2017egalitarianism APACrefauthors Scheffler, S. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . What is Egalitarianism? What is egalitarianism? 309--344,

    2017

  77. [85]

    APACrefauthors \ 1979

    scheuneman1979bias APACrefauthors Scheuneman, J. APACrefauthors \ 1979 . A Method of Assessing Bias in Test Items A method of assessing bias in test items . Journal of Educational Measurement 16 143--152,

    1979

  78. [86]

    , Calandra, D

    secinaro2021aihealthcare APACrefauthors Secinaro, S. , Calandra, D. , Secinaro, A. , Muthurangu, V. Biancone, P. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Structured Literature Review The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A struc...

    2021

  79. [87]

    , Rappon, T

    shahid2019neuralnetworks APACrefauthors Shahid, N. , Rappon, T. Berta, W. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Applications of Artificial Neural Networks in Health Care Organizational Decision-Making: A Scoping Review Applications of artificial neural networks in health care organizational...

    2019

  80. [88]

    \ Park, Y.J

    shin2019algorithmic APACrefauthors Shin, D. \ Park, Y.J. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Role of Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Algorithmic Affordance Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance . Computers in Human Behavior 98 277--284,

    2019

  81. [89]

    , Kursuncu, U

    simsek2020hybrid APACrefauthors Simsek, S. , Kursuncu, U. , Kibis, E. , AnisAbdellatif, M. Dag, A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . A hybrid data mining approach for identifying the temporal effects of variables associated with breast cancer survival A hybrid data mining approach for i...

    2020

  82. [90]

    , Neveditsin, N

    singhal2024fairness APACrefauthors Singhal, A. , Neveditsin, N. , Tanveer, H. Mago, V. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Toward Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics in AI for Social Media and Health Care: Scoping Review Toward fairness, accountability, transparency, and et...

    2024

  83. [91]

    soenksen2022framework APACrefauthors Soenksen, L.R. , Ma, Y. Zeng, e.a., C. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Integrated Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Framework for Health Care Applications Integrated multimodal artificial intelligence framework for health care applications . NPJ D...

    2022

  84. [92]

    , Tucker, A.L

    song2015queue APACrefauthors Song, H. , Tucker, A.L. Murrell, K.L. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . The Diseconomies of Queue Pooling: An Empirical Investigation of Emergency Department Length of Stay The diseconomies of queue pooling: An empirical investigation of emergency department...

    2015

  85. [93]

    APACrefauthors \ 2018

    stephanopoulos2018disparate APACrefauthors Stephanopoulos, N.O. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Disparate Impact, Unified Law Disparate impact, unified law . Yale Law Journal 128 1566--1620,

    2018

  86. [94]

    , Deruyck, P

    stevens2020explainability APACrefauthors Stevens, A. , Deruyck, P. , Van Veldhoven, Z. Vanthienen, J. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Explainability and Fairness in Machine Learning: Improve Fair End-to-end Lending for Kiva Explainability and fairness in machine learning: Improve fair...

    2020

  87. [95]

    , Zwiggelaar, R

    stone2022los APACrefauthors Stone, K. , Zwiggelaar, R. , Jones, P. Mac Parthaláin, N. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . A Systematic Review of the Prediction of Hospital Length of Stay: Towards a Unified Framework A systematic review of the prediction of hospital length of stay: Towards...

    2022

  88. [96]

    tan2019diabetic APACrefauthors Tan, e.a., T. W. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Disparities in Outcomes of Patients Admitted with Diabetic Foot Infections Disparities in outcomes of patients admitted with diabetic foot infections . PLOS One 14 2 e0211481,

    2019

  89. [97]

    APACrefauthors \ 1971

    thorndike1971culture APACrefauthors Thorndike, R.L. APACrefauthors \ 1971 . Concepts of Culture‐Fairness Concepts of culture‐fairness . Journal of Educational Measurement 8 2 63--70,

    1971

  90. [98]

    APACrefauthors \ 1996

    tibshirani1996lasso APACrefauthors Tibshirani, R. APACrefauthors \ 1996 . Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 58 1 267--288,

    1996

  91. [99]

    \ Gonzalez-Sanz, J.D

    toledano2024ethics APACrefauthors Toledano, N. \ Gonzalez-Sanz, J.D. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Beyond the Good and the Right: Rethinking the Ethics of Academic Entrepreneurship from a Relational Perspective Beyond the good and the right: Rethinking the ethics of academic entrepr...

    2024

  92. [100]

    APACrefauthors \ 2010

    tolliver2010earlychildhood APACrefauthors Tolliver, R. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . The Connection Between Health Disparities and the Social Determinants of Health in Early Childhood The connection between health disparities and the social determinants of health in early childhood ...

    2010

  93. [101]

    uddin2024fairness APACrefauthors Uddin, S. , Lu, H. , Rahman, A. Gao, J. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . A Novel Approach for Assessing Fairness in Deployed Machine Learning Algorithms A novel approach for assessing fairness in deployed machine learning algorithms . Scientific Reports...

    2024

  94. [102]

    , Kakinuma, T

    ueda2024fairness APACrefauthors Ueda, D. , Kakinuma, T. Fujita, e.a., S. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Fairness of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Review and Recommendations Fairness of artificial intelligence in health care: Review and recommendations . Japanese Journal of ...

    2024

  95. [103]

    \ Binns, R

    veale2017fairer APACrefauthors Veale, M. \ Binns, R. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive...

    2017

  96. [104]

    APACrefauthors \ 2011

    wax2011disparate APACrefauthors Wax, A.L. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . Disparate Impact Realism Disparate impact realism . William & Mary Law Review 53 621,

    2011

  97. [105]

    , Price, W.N

    wiens2020bias APACrefauthors Wiens, J. , Price, W.N. Sjoding, M.W. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Diagnosing Bias in Data-Driven Algorithms for Health Care Diagnosing bias in data-driven algorithms for health care . Nature Medicine 26 1 25--26,

    2020

  98. [106]

    , Kerridge, I

    wiersma2023ethics APACrefauthors Wiersma, M. , Kerridge, I. Lipworth, W. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Clinical Innovation Ethics Frameworks: A Systematic Narrative Review Clinical innovation ethics frameworks: A systematic narrative review . Health Policy 129 104706,

    2023

  99. [107]

    \ Honavar, V

    yang1998feature APACrefauthors Yang, J. \ Honavar, V. APACrefauthors \ 1998 . Feature subset selection using a genetic algorithm Feature subset selection using a genetic algorithm . IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications 13 2 44--49,

    1998

  100. [108]

    APACrefauthors \ 2022

    yearby2022justice APACrefauthors Yearby, R. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . The Social Determinants of Health, Health Disparities, and Health Justice The social determinants of health, health disparities, and health justice . Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 50 4 641--649,

    2022

  101. [109]

    , Lemoine, B

    zhang2018adversarial APACrefauthors Zhang, B.H. , Lemoine, B. Mitchell, M. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learning Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning . Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society...

    2018

  102. [110]

    , Friedmann, P.D

    zhang2003retention APACrefauthors Zhang, Z. , Friedmann, P.D. Gerstein, D.R. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . Does Retention Matter? Treatment Duration and Improvement in Drug Use Does retention matter? treatment duration and improvement in drug use . Addiction 98 5 673--684,

    2003

  103. [111]

    , Rosset, S

    zhu2003svm APACrefauthors Zhu, J. , Rosset, S. , Tibshirani, R. Hastie, T. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . 1-norm support vector machines 1-norm support vector machines . Advances in neural information processing systems Advances in neural information processing systems \ ( 16)

    2003

  104. [112]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year eprint archive archivePrefix primaryClass adsurl adsnote version label INTEGERS o...

  105. [113]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap duplicate "7" = swap duplicate "8" = swap "9" = or or or or or or...

  106. [114]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year archivePrefix primaryClass adsurl adsnote version label extra.labe...

  107. [115]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION add.period duplicate empty 'skip "." * add.blank if FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap dupl...

  108. [116]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION output.doi doi empty skip "doi:" doi * "" * output if FUNCTION format.archive archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if FUNCTION format.primaryClass primaryClass empty "" " [" primaryClass * "] " * if FUNCTION format....

  109. [117]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION string.to.integer 't := t text.length 'k := #1 'char.num := t char.num #1 substring 's := s is.num s "." = or char.num k = not and char.num #1 + 'char.num := while char.num #1 - 'char.num := t #1 char.num substring FUNCTI...

  110. [118]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url doi volume year archivePrefix primaryClass eid adsurl adsnote version label INTEGERS o...

  111. [119]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  112. [120]

    Available from:

    ENTRY address assignee author booktitle chapter cartographer day edition editor howpublished institution inventor journal key keywords month note number organization pages part publisher school series title type volume word year eprint doi url lastchecked updated archive archi...

  113. [121]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  114. [122]

    write newline

    " write newline " cite write " FUNCTION editor.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION editor.trans.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION trans.postfix translator num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION authors.editors.reflist.apa5 'field := 'dot :...

  115. [123]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION string.to.integer 't := t text.length 'k := #1 'char.num := t char.num #1 substring 's := s is.num s "." = or char.num k = not and char.num #1 + 'char.num := while char.num #1 - 'char.num := t #1 char.num substring FUNCTI...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.