Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Machine Learning Calabi-Yau Four-folds

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.02544 v2 pith:U6R7KJSD submitted 2020-09-05 hep-th math.AGstat.ML

classification hep-thmath.AGstat.ML
keywords calabi-yaudatahodgelearningnumbersfour-foldsmachinemanifolds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Hodge numbers of Calabi-Yau manifolds depend non-trivially on the underlying manifold data and they present an interesting challenge for machine learning. In this letter we consider the data set of complete intersection Calabi-Yau four-folds, a set of about 900,000 topological types, and study supervised learning of the Hodge numbers h^1,1 and h^3,1 for these manifolds. We find that h^1,1 can be successfully learned (to 96% precision) by fully connected classifier and regressor networks. While both types of networks fail for h^3,1, we show that a more complicated two-branch network, combined with feature enhancement, can act as an efficient regressor (to 98% precision) for h^3,1, at least for a subset of the data. This hints at the existence of an, as yet unknown, formula for Hodge numbers.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Machine Learning Free Quotients of CICYs

    hep-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Machine-learning classifiers, especially a multi-head attention model, correctly identify almost all free Z2, Z3, Z4, and Z2xZ2 quotients of CICYs on held-out manifolds, with only three missed Z2xZ2 cases.

Pith tools