Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 75 references

HUPE: Heuristic Underwater Perceptual Enhancement with Semantic Collaborative Learning

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An invertible network with Fourier and semantic guidance improves underwater image quality and downstream perception tasks in one pass.

desk verdict Solid incremental method paper whose central quantitative claim is undercut by a glaring Table 2 error (EUVP UIQM = 20.9151); the semantic collaborative learning idea is the most interesting part. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18296 v2 pith:U6ZFYKUN submitted 2024-11-27 cs.CV

Zengxi Zhang , Zhiying Jiang , Long Ma , Jinyuan Liu , Xin Fan , Risheng Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords underwaterimageenhancementinvertiblenetworknormalizingflowFouriertransformsemanticsegmentationobjectdetectionheuristicpriorcollaborativelearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that underwater image enhancement can serve both visual quality and downstream perception tasks at once by building the enhancement as an invertible mapping with physically motivated priors and a semantic collaboration mechanism. The authors introduce HUPE, a network that learns a bidirectional translation between degraded underwater images and clear counterparts, while a feature-level collaboration module feeds semantic cues from detection or segmentation networks back into the enhancement process. They report that HUPE produces higher-quality enhanced images than state-of-the-art methods on standard benchmarks and, more importantly, yields better object detection and semantic segmentation results when the enhanced images are used as inputs. If correct, this would make enhancement a more practical preprocessing tool for underwater robotics and monitoring.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Hybrid Invertible Block (HIB), a stack of reversible transformations (Actnorm, invertible 1x1 convolution, a Heuristic Prior Injector, and a Frequency-Aware Affine Coupling) that maps an underwater image to a clear image in the forward pass and back again in the reverse pass. The heuristic prior injector estimates ambient light and transmission using depth and gradient maps derived from a dark-channel prior; the frequency-aware coupling uses the Fourier transform so the network sees both phase (semantic) and amplitude (style) information. On top of this, the Semantic Collaborative Learning module, with a Meta-Feature Generator and Feature Transformation Block, inserts task-aware features into the enhancement network's intermediate layers during training, so the enhancer learns to keep semantic structure. The whole system is trained with a guide loss, an enhancement loss combining contrastive, frequency, and bilateral terms, and a task loss.

What would settle it

Take a set of underwater scenes for which true clear-water reference photographs exist (for example, the same objects photographed in a laboratory tank with clear water), train and test HUPE on those pairs, and compare PSNR/SSIM and downstream detection/segmentation accuracy against the baselines; if HUPE does not outperform them on these physically grounded references, its claim of perceptual enhancement is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a heuristic invertible network with an embedded Fourier transform and semantic collaborative learning can simultaneously improve the visual appearance of underwater images and make them more useful for object detection and semantic segmentation. The authors argue that the reversibility of the mapping preserves information that ordinary one-way enhancement networks lose, the Fourier-based affine coupling captures relationships in both spatial and frequency domains, and the collaborative learning module narrows the feature gap between low-level enhancement and high-level perception. They support this with quantitative and qualitative experiments on UIEBD, UCCS, U45, and EUVP for enhancement, and on RUIE, Aquarium, and SUIM for detection and segmentation, concluding that HUPE is both a strong enhancer and a strong preprocessor for perception tasks.

Load-bearing premise

The training and evaluation rely on paired 'clear' reference images that are themselves outputs of other underwater enhancement methods rather than true photographs of the same scenes in clear water, so the supervised quality scores may reward imitating other enhancers instead of true physical restoration.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Enhanced images from HUPE can be fed directly into standard detectors and segmenters, improving their accuracy without retraining the perception networks' architecture.
  • Because the mapping is invertible, the same network can be used to reconstruct the original underwater image from an enhanced one, which may help downstream tasks that need consistency or reversibility.
  • The joint optimization scheme suggests a general recipe: any low-level restoration network can be coupled with a downstream perception network through meta-features to produce task-oriented restorations.
  • The heuristic priors (depth and gradient) reduce the network's reliance on large paired datasets, making the approach more adaptable to new underwater conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method's reliance on synthetic or algorithm-generated references means the reported PSNR/SSIM gains may overstate true physical restoration; a fairer test would use images with known clear-water counterparts or human preference studies.
  • The semantic collaboration idea could be transferred to other degradation domains, such as low-light or haze, where the same tension between visual quality and perception-task performance exists.
  • Because the invertible network is a normalizing-flow-style architecture, the learned mapping could potentially be used for uncertainty estimation or generation of diverse plausible clear images, though the paper does not explore this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes HUPE, an invertible network for underwater image enhancement that combines a reversible flow-based mapping (with Fourier-based affine coupling and a physical prior injector) with a semantic collaborative learning module that couples the enhancement network to downstream detection and segmentation networks. The method is evaluated on UIEBD, UCCS, U45, and EUVP for enhancement quality and on RUIE, Aquarium, and SUIM for downstream object detection and semantic segmentation, with ablations on loss components, heuristic prior inputs, the spatial-frequency block, the number of hybrid invertible blocks and flow steps, and the collaborative module. The central claim is that HUPE simultaneously improves visual quality and downstream perception performance.

Significance. If the empirical claims were fully supported, the paper would offer a useful architectural contribution: an invertible enhancement network with frequency-domain coupling, a physical-prior injector, and a mechanism for aligning enhancement features with task features. The open-source code, the breadth of datasets, and the inclusion of two downstream tasks are genuine strengths. However, the current quantitative evidence contains an apparent data anomaly and lacks error bars or significance tests, so the central superiority claim cannot yet be assessed reliably.

major comments (4)
  1. [Table 2, §4.3.2] The EUVP UIQM entry for 'Ours' is 20.9151, while every other method on EUVP ranges from about 3.11 to 4.57 and the same model's UIQM on UIEBD, UCCS, and U45 is 4.20, 4.70, and 4.22, respectively. UIQM is a scalar image-quality measure with no known scaling that would make 20.9 a plausible value for this model, so this entry appears to be a transcription error. Because Table 2 is the main quantitative support for the abstract and conclusion claims of superior visual enhancement, and because neighboring cells already show HUPE below SemiUIR on UIEBD PSNR and below WaterFlow on EUVP UCIQE, the printed table cannot support the superiority claim until this cell is corrected and the full table is re-verified.
  2. [§4.3.2, Table 2] No error bars, confidence intervals, or significance tests are reported for any enhancement metric, and all comparisons appear to be single runs. Many observed differences are very small (for example, U45 UCIQE 0.6229 vs. 0.6241 and EUVP CEIQ 3.4679 vs. 3.4769), so without repeated trials or statistical tests they cannot be distinguished from run-to-run variation. This is load-bearing because the paper's central claim is a superiority claim over state-of-the-art methods.
  3. [§4.2, §4.4, §4.5.6] The downstream comparison may not be apples-to-apples. HUPE's enhancement network and task perception module are jointly finetuned for an additional 20 epochs with the proposed semantic collaborative learning module, whereas the paper does not state whether the comparison enhancement methods receive an equivalent joint finetuning stage. If the task networks are trained on each enhanced image set with identical parameters but only HUPE gets the extra finetuning, the advantage could be due to that additional training stage rather than to the enhanced image quality. The protocol should be clarified, or an ablation should show that HUPE also wins without the joint finetuning advantage.
  4. [§4.3.2] The paper correctly acknowledges that UIEBD reference images are outputs of other underwater image enhancement methods rather than real captures of clear underwater scenes. This means the supervised PSNR/SSIM numbers and the supervised training objective measure imitation of those particular enhancers, not physical fidelity to true in-air scenes. The visual-quality claim therefore depends heavily on the non-reference metrics and qualitative comparisons; with the EUVP UIQM anomaly and the absence of statistical tests, that support is currently insufficient. A human perceptual study or a validation on data with real ground-truth clear images would substantially strengthen the claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.2] The sentence 'RUIE and Aquarium ... were used to evaluate the effectiveness of Tatarflow' contains a typo; it should refer to HUPE (or WaterFlow). The paper should also disambiguate 'WaterFlow' as both the preliminary version name and a comparison baseline.
  2. [§4.5.4, §4.5.5, Fig. 14] The text for the Hybrid Invertible Block ablation refers to panel (c) of Fig. 14, and the flow-step ablation refers to panel (d), but the caption assigns (d) to the number of HIBs and (e) to the number of flow steps. Please renumber the cross-references.
  3. [Eqs. (3), (4)] In Eq. (3), the notation phi_i(u_i^1,F) is used for both the multiplicative and additive terms of the affine coupling; two different functions (scale and shift) should be defined. In Eq. (4), the symbol k is used as the imaginary unit after i was already used as an index; please use a consistent and clearly defined imaginary-unit symbol.
  4. [Eq. (1)] The transmission model is written as J^c = I^c/t + B^c(t-1)/t, which differs from the standard form J = (I-B)/t + B. Please check the algebra, since the heuristic prior injector is derived from this equation.
  5. [Fig. 13 and §3.4] The ablation figure caption refers to 'L1, Ls and Lc' as 'L1 loss, style loss, and contrasive loss,' while the loss equations define L_f as a frequency loss; the terminology should be unified so that the style/frequency loss has one name.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central enhancement and downstream-task claims rest on external benchmark comparisons, with only minor non-load-bearing self-citations to the authors' WaterFlow.

full rationale

The main derivation chain is not circular. The forward enhancement GE(Iu) is trained with supervised, contrastive, frequency, and bilateral losses against reference images plus task losses for detection/segmentation, and is then evaluated on held-out splits (UIEBD 90 test pairs, RUIE 676 test images, Aquarium 63 test images, SUIM 110 test images) with fixed detectors and segmenters. Equation (8)'s reverse term ||G^{-1}_E(Ir) - Iu||_2 is a cycle-consistency training objective, not a prediction that is forced by construction; at inference only the underwater image is supplied, and the enhanced output is not read back from the reference. The heuristic prior branch estimates (Bi, Ti) from the input using a dark-channel-derived encoder and conditions the invertible blocks; these are model inputs, not fitted values later reported as predictions. The only self-citations are the Heuristic Prior guided Encoder architecture 'illustrated in the previous version (Zhang et al., 2023)' (Sec. 3.1, Eq. 2) and loss choices 'based on past experience (Zhang et al., 2023)' (Sec. 3.4). These are incremental references to the authors' WaterFlow and are not load-bearing: the paper's superiority claims are supported by Tables 2 and Figs. 4-12, 20-21 comparing against eight external methods. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from prior work to rule out alternatives. Two empirical caveats are noted but do not affect the circularity verdict: Sec. 4.3.2 acknowledges that UIEBD references are outputs of other enhancement methods rather than real captures, which limits the interpretation of PSNR/SSIM but does not make the derivation circular; and Table 2's EUVP UIQM entry for Ours (20.9151) is an order-of-magnitude outlier relative to all other methods (roughly 4.19-4.58) and should be corrected as a reporting issue. Overall, the central claim is independently testable and not equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a physical imaging model, a dark-channel-prior heuristic, and the invertibility of the network architecture. The loss weights and architecture sizes are hand-chosen, but they are not fitted to the target result in a hidden way. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Loss weights lambda_1, lambda_2, lambda_3, lambda_4 = 1, 0.05, 1, 0.2
    Hand-chosen weights in the enhancement loss and joint training loss; the central training objective depends on these values, and no sensitivity analysis is provided.
  • Number of Hybrid Invertible Blocks N = 3
    Selected by ablation experiments in Section 4.5.4; the network depth is a manually tuned hyperparameter on validation performance.
  • Number of flow steps per HIB = 6
    Selected by ablation experiments in Section 4.5.5; this controls the transformation capacity of each block.
  • Contrastive loss layer weights rho_i = 1/32, 1/16, 1/8, 1/4, 1
    Hand-assigned weights for VGG19 feature layers in the contrastive fidelity term; these come from prior practice but are chosen rather than derived.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Underwater image formation follows the single scattering model in Eq. (1): J^c = (1/t) I^c + (1/t) B^c (t-1).
    Invoked in Section 3.1 as the basis for the Heuristic Prior Injector. Real underwater scenes include non-uniform backscatter, forward scatter, and wavelength-dependent attenuation that this simple model may not capture.
  • domain assumption Transmission follows the Beer-Lambert law t(x) = exp(beta d(x)) with a constant attenuation coefficient beta.
    Used in Section 3.1 to justify estimating depth and transmission. In turbid or highly scattering water, the exponential attenuation assumption is only approximate.
  • domain assumption Depth and gradient maps estimated from the generalized dark channel prior are reliable heuristic priors.
    The Heuristic Prior guided Encoder concatenates these estimates with the input in Eq. (2). If the dark-channel-prior estimates fail, the injected heuristic information is misleading.
  • domain assumption In Fourier domain, phase conveys semantic information and amplitude conveys style.
    Stated in Section 3.2 following Xu et al. and used to design the Spatial-Frequency Affine Block. This is a heuristic about image statistics, not a theorem.
  • standard math The affine coupling layer remains invertible because its scale and shift functions depend only on the unchanged part of the input.
    The Hybrid Invertible Block relies on Glow-style invertibility of Actnorm, 1x1 convolution, affine coupling, and squeeze. The paper does not prove that the specific Spatial-Frequency Affine Block satisfies the nonzero-scale condition in the discrete implementation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of HUPE: Heuristic Underwater Perceptual Enhancement with Semantic Collaborative Learning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U6ZFYKUN

@misc{pith2026241118296,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: HUPE: Heuristic Underwater Perceptual Enhancement with Semantic Collaborative Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U6ZFYKUN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18296}
}
read the original abstract

Underwater images are often affected by light refraction and absorption, reducing visibility and interfering with subsequent applications. Existing underwater image enhancement methods primarily focus on improving visual quality while overlooking practical implications. To strike a balance between visual quality and application, we propose a heuristic invertible network for underwater perception enhancement, dubbed HUPE, which enhances visual quality and demonstrates flexibility in handling other downstream tasks. Specifically, we introduced an information-preserving reversible transformation with embedded Fourier transform to establish a bidirectional mapping between underwater images and their clear images. Additionally, a heuristic prior is incorporated into the enhancement process to better capture scene information. To further bridge the feature gap between vision-based enhancement images and application-oriented images, a semantic collaborative learning module is applied in the joint optimization process of the visual enhancement task and the downstream task, which guides the proposed enhancement model to extract more task-oriented semantic features while obtaining visually pleasing images. Extensive experiments, both quantitative and qualitative, demonstrate the superiority of our HUPE over state-of-the-art methods. The source code is available at https://github.com/ZengxiZhang/HUPE.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , Edgington , D.R

    bchapter Walther , D. , Edgington , D.R. , Koch , C. : Detection and tracking of objects in underwater video . In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. , vol. 1 , p. ( 2004 ). IEEE bchapter

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    , McGuire , N.E

    barticle Cai , L. , McGuire , N.E. , Hanlon , R. , Mooney , T.A. , Girdhar , Y. : Semi-supervised visual tracking of marine animals using autonomous underwater vehicles . International Journal of Computer Vision 131 ( 6 ), 1406 -- 1427 ( 2023 ) barticle

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    , Chen , C.-C

    barticle Hsiao , Y.-H. , Chen , C.-C. , Lin , S.-I. , Lin , F.-P. : Real-world underwater fish recognition and identification, using sparse representation . Ecological informatics 23 , 13 -- 21 ( 2014 ) barticle

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    , Burghardt , T

    barticle Hughes , B. , Burghardt , T. : Automated visual fin identification of individual great white sharks . International Journal of Computer Vision 122 , 542 -- 557 ( 2017 ) barticle

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    , Zhang , B

    barticle McEver , R.A. , Zhang , B. , Levenson , C. , Iftekhar , A. , Manjunath , B. : Context-driven detection of invertebrate species in deep-sea video . International Journal of Computer Vision 131 ( 6 ), 1367 -- 1388 ( 2023 ) barticle

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    , Wang , Y

    barticle Cai , M. , Wang , Y. , Wang , S. , Wang , R. , Ren , Y. , Tan , M. : Grasping marine products with hybrid-driven underwater vehicle-manipulator system . IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 17 ( 3 ), 1443 -- 1454 ( 2020 ) barticle

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    , Cho , D

    botherref Lee , S. , Cho , D. , Kim , J. , Kim , T.H. : Self-supervised fast adaptation for denoising via meta-learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.02899 (2020) botherref

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    , Mihaylova , L

    barticle Chen , R. , Mihaylova , L. , Zhu , H. , Bouaynaya , N.C. : A deep learning framework for joint image restoration and recognition . Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing 39 ( 3 ), 1561 -- 1580 ( 2020 ) barticle

    work page 2020

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    , Wang , Y

    bchapter Chi , Z. , Wang , Y. , Yu , Y. , Tang , J. : Test-time fast adaptation for dynamic scene deblurring via meta-auxiliary learning . In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 9137 -- 9146 ( 2021 ) bchapter

    2021

  2. [10]

    , Jiang , Z

    bchapter Zhang , Z. , Jiang , Z. , Liu , J. , Fan , X. , Liu , R. : Waterflow: Heuristic normalizing flow for underwater image enhancement and beyond . In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pp. 7314 -- 7323 ( 2023 ) bchapter

    2023

  3. [11]

    , Odetayo , M

    bchapter Iqbal , K. , Odetayo , M. , James , A. , Salam , R.A. , Talib , A.Z.H. : Enhancing the low quality images using unsupervised colour correction method . In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics , pp. 1703 -- 1709 ( 2010 ). IEEE bchapter

    2010

  4. [12]

    , Awalludin , E.A

    bchapter Hitam , M.S. , Awalludin , E.A. , Yussof , W.N.J.H.W. , Bachok , Z. : Mixture contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization for underwater image enhancement . In: 2013 International Conference on Computer Applications Technology (ICCAT) , pp. 1 -- 5 ( 2013 ). IEEE bchapter

    2013

  5. [13]

    , Isa , N.A.M

    barticle Ghani , A.S.A. , Isa , N.A.M. : Underwater image quality enhancement through integrated color model with rayleigh distribution . Applied soft computing 27 , 219 -- 230 ( 2015 ) barticle

    2015

  6. [14]

    , Quo , J

    bchapter Li , C. , Quo , J. , Pang , Y. , Chen , S. , Wang , J. : Single underwater image restoration by blue-green channels dehazing and red channel correction . In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pp. 1731 -- 1735 ( 20...

    2016

  7. [15]

    , Chen , Y.-C

    barticle Chiang , J.Y. , Chen , Y.-C. : Underwater image enhancement by wavelength compensation and dehazing . IEEE transactions on image processing 21 ( 4 ), 1756 -- 1769 ( 2011 ) barticle

    2011

  8. [16]

    , Nascimento , E

    bchapter Drews , P. , Nascimento , E. , Moraes , F. , Botelho , S. , Campos , M. : Transmission estimation in underwater single images . In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops , pp. 825 -- 830 ( 2013 ) bchapter

    2013

  9. [17]

    , Zhang , Y

    bchapter Ye , T. , Zhang , Y. , Jiang , M. , Chen , L. , Liu , Y. , Chen , S. , Chen , E. : Perceiving and modeling density for image dehazing . In: European Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 130 -- 145 ( 2022 ). Springer bchapter

    2022

  10. [18]

    , Guo , J

    barticle Li , C. , Guo , J. , Guo , C. , Cong , R. , Gong , J. : A hybrid method for underwater image correction . Pattern Recognition Letters 94 , 62 -- 67 ( 2017 ) barticle

    2017

  11. [19]

    , Liu , H

    barticle Wang , Y. , Liu , H. , Chau , L.-P. : Single underwater image restoration using adaptive attenuation-curve prior . IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers 65 ( 3 ), 992 -- 1002 ( 2017 ) barticle

    2017

  12. [20]

    , Cao , K

    barticle Peng , Y.-T. , Cao , K. , Cosman , P.C. : Generalization of the dark channel prior for single image restoration . IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 27 ( 6 ), 2856 -- 2868 ( 2018 ) barticle

    2018

  13. [21]

    , Fan , B

    barticle Fan , G.-D. , Fan , B. , Gan , M. , Chen , G.-Y. , Chen , C.P. : Multiscale low-light image enhancement network with illumination constraint . IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 32 ( 11 ), 7403 -- 7417 ( 2022 ) barticle

    2022

  14. [22]

    , Shang , J

    barticle Liu , J. , Shang , J. , Liu , R. , Fan , X. : Attention-guided global-local adversarial learning for detail-preserving multi-exposure image fusion . IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 32 ( 8 ), 5026 -- 5040 ( 2022 ) barticle

    2022

  15. [23]

    , Li , Z

    botherref Jiang , Z. , Li , Z. , Yang , S. , Fan , X. , Liu , R. : Target oriented perceptual adversarial fusion network for underwater image enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2022) botherref

    2022

  16. [24]

    , Lin , R

    barticle Liu , J. , Lin , R. , Wu , G. , Liu , R. , Luo , Z. , Fan , X. : Coconet: Coupled contrastive learning network with multi-level feature ensemble for multi-modality image fusion . International Journal of Computer Vision 132 ( 5 ), 1748 -- 1775 ( 2024 ) barticle

    2024

  17. [25]

    , Zhou , J

    bchapter Zhang , D. , Zhou , J. , Guo , C. , Zhang , W. , Li , C. : Synergistic multiscale detail refinement via intrinsic supervision for underwater image enhancement . In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 38 , pp. 7033 -- 7041 ( 2024 ) bchapter

    2024

  18. [26]

    , Xie , H

    barticle Wei , D. , Xie , H. , Zhang , Z. , Yan , T. : Learning a holistic-specific color transformer with couple contrastive constraints for underwater image enhancement and beyond . Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 98 , 104059 ( 2024 ) barticle

    2024

  19. [27]

    , Liu , R

    barticle Jiang , Z. , Liu , R. , Yang , S. , Zhang , Z. , Fan , X. : Drnet: Learning a dynamic recursion network for chaotic rain streak removal . Pattern Recognition 158 , 111004 ( 2025 ) barticle

    2025

  20. [28]

    , Zhang , P

    botherref Chen , X. , Zhang , P. , Quan , L. , Yi , C. , Lu , C. : Underwater image enhancement based on deep learning and image formation model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00991 (2021) botherref

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    , Anwar , S

    barticle Li , C. , Anwar , S. , Hou , J. , Cong , R. , Guo , C. , Ren , W. : Underwater image enhancement via medium transmission-guided multi-color space embedding . IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 30 , 4985 -- 5000 ( 2021 ) barticle

    2021

  22. [30]

    , Qian , H

    bchapter Mu , P. , Qian , H. , Bai , C. : Structure-inferred bi-level model for underwater image enhancement . In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pp. 2286 -- 2295 ( 2022 ) bchapter

    2022

  23. [31]

    , Jiang , Z

    barticle Liu , R. , Jiang , Z. , Yang , S. , Fan , X. : Twin adversarial contrastive learning for underwater image enhancement and beyond . IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 31 , 4922 -- 4936 ( 2022 ) barticle

    2022

  24. [32]

    , Gui , J

    bchapter Cong , X. , Gui , J. , Hou , J. : Underwater organism color fine-tuning via decomposition and guidance . In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 38 , pp. 1389 -- 1398 ( 2024 ) bchapter

    2024

  25. [33]

    , Wang , K

    botherref Huang , S. , Wang , K. , Liu , H. , Chen , J. , Li , Y. : Contrastive semi-supervised learning for underwater image restoration via reliable bank. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.09101 (2023) botherref

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    , Sun , J

    botherref Zhou , J. , Sun , J. , Li , C. , Jiang , Q. , Zhou , M. , Lam , K.-M. , Zhang , W. , Fu , X. : Hclr-net: Hybrid contrastive learning regularization with locally randomized perturbation for underwater image enhancement. International Journal of Computer Vision (2024) ...

    2024

  27. [35]

    , Lin , C.-H

    barticle Yeh , C.-H. , Lin , C.-H. , Kang , L.-W. , Huang , C.-H. , Lin , M.-H. , Chang , C.-Y. , Wang , C.-C. : Lightweight deep neural network for joint learning of underwater object detection and color conversion . IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 3...

    2021

  28. [36]

    , Sun , B

    barticle Zeng , L. , Sun , B. , Zhu , D. : Underwater target detection based on faster r-cnn and adversarial occlusion network . Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 100 , 104190 ( 2021 ) barticle

    2021

  29. [37]

    , Edge , C

    botherref Islam , M.J. , Edge , C. , Xiao , Y. , Luo , P. , Mehtaz , M. , Morse , C. , Enan , S.S. , Sattar , J. : Semantic segmentation of underwater imagery: Dataset and benchmark. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) botherref

    2020

  30. [38]

    , Dong , B

    barticle Li , L. , Dong , B. , Rigall , E. , Zhou , T. , Dong , J. , Chen , G. : Marine animal segmentation . IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 32 ( 4 ), 2303 -- 2314 ( 2021 ) barticle

    2021

  31. [39]

    , Zhang , Z

    barticle Jiang , Z. , Zhang , Z. , Yu , Y. , Liu , R. : Bilevel modeling investigated generative adversarial framework for image restoration . The Visual Computer 39 ( 11 ), 5563 -- 5575 ( 2023 ) barticle

    2023

  32. [40]

    , Liu , X

    botherref Liu , R. , Liu , X. , Zeng , S. , Zhang , J. , Zhang , Y. : Value-function-based sequential minimization for bi-level optimization. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2023) botherref

    2023

  33. [41]

    , Liu , X

    botherref Liu , R. , Liu , X. , Zeng , S. , Zhang , J. , Zhang , Y. : Hierarchical optimization-derived learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2023) botherref

    2023

  34. [42]

    , Fu , H

    bchapter Wu , G. , Fu , H. , Liu , J. , Ma , L. , Fan , X. , Liu , R. : Hybrid-supervised dual-search: Leveraging automatic learning for loss-free multi-exposure image fusion . In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 38 , pp. 5985 -- 5993 ( 202...

    2024

  35. [43]

    , Gao , J

    botherref Liu , R. , Gao , J. , Liu , X. , Fan , X. : Learning with constraint learning: New perspective, solution strategy and various applications. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2024) botherref

    2024

  36. [44]

    , Tezcan , K.C

    bchapter You , S. , Tezcan , K.C. , Chen , X. , Konukoglu , E. : Unsupervised lesion detection via image restoration with a normative prior . In: International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning , pp. 540 -- 556 ( 2019 ). PMLR bchapter

    2019

  37. [45]

    , Ren , W

    barticle Sun , S. , Ren , W. , Wang , T. , Cao , X. : Rethinking image restoration for object detection . Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 , 4461 -- 4474 ( 2022 ) barticle

    2022

  38. [46]

    , Xie , S

    bchapter Zhao , W. , Xie , S. , Zhao , F. , He , Y. , Lu , H. : Metafusion: Infrared and visible image fusion via meta-feature embedding from object detection . In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 13955 -- 13965 ( 2023 ) bchapter

    2023

  39. [47]

    , Liu , Z

    botherref Liu , R. , Liu , Z. , Liu , J. , Fan , X. , Luo , Z. : A task-guided, implicitly-searched and metainitialized deep model for image fusion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2024) botherref

    2024

  40. [48]

    , Dhariwal , P

    botherref Kingma , D.P. , Dhariwal , P. : Glow: Generative flow with invertible 1x1 convolutions. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018) botherref

    2018

  41. [49]

    : Essai D'optique sur la Gradation de la Lumi \`e re , ( 1729 ) bbook

    bbook Bouguer , P. : Essai D'optique sur la Gradation de la Lumi \`e re , ( 1729 ) bbook

  42. [50]

    , Li , J

    bchapter Li , H. , Li , J. , Zhao , D. , Xu , L. : Dehazeflow: Multi-scale conditional flow network for single image dehazing . In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pp. 2577 -- 2585 ( 2021 ) bchapter

    2021

  43. [51]

    , Zhao , Z.-Q

    bchapter Shen , H. , Zhao , Z.-Q. , Zhang , Y. , Zhang , Z. : Mutual information-driven triple interaction network for efficient image dehazing . In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pp. 7 -- 16 ( 2023 ) bchapter

    2023

  44. [52]

    , Fan , G

    barticle Yao , Z. , Fan , G. , Fan , J. , Gan , M. , Philip Chen , C.L. : Spatial–frequency dual-domain feature fusion network for low-light remote sensing image enhancement . IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 62 , 1 -- 16 ( 2024 ) barticle

    2024

  45. [53]

    , Morrow , R

    barticle Brigham , E.O. , Morrow , R. : The fast fourier transform . IEEE spectrum 4 ( 12 ), 63 -- 70 ( 1967 ) barticle

    1967

  46. [54]

    , Zhang , R

    bchapter Xu , Q. , Zhang , R. , Zhang , Y. , Wang , Y. , Tian , Q. : A fourier-based framework for domain generalization . In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 14383 -- 14392 ( 2021 ) bchapter

    2021

  47. [55]

    , Zisserman , A

    botherref Simonyan , K. , Zisserman , A. : Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014) botherref

    2014 arXiv

  48. [56]

    , Goyal , P

    bchapter Lin , T.-Y. , Goyal , P. , Girshick , R. , He , K. , Doll \'a r , P. : Focal loss for dense object detection . In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 2980 -- 2988 ( 2017 ) bchapter

    2017

  49. [57]

    , Tsoi , N

    bchapter Rezatofighi , H. , Tsoi , N. , Gwak , J. , Sadeghian , A. , Reid , I. , Savarese , S. : Generalized intersection over union: A metric and a loss for bounding box regression . In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 6...

    2019

  50. [58]

    , Guo , C

    barticle Li , C. , Guo , C. , Ren , W. , Cong , R. , Hou , J. , Kwong , S. , Tao , D. : An underwater image enhancement benchmark dataset and beyond . IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29 , 4376 -- 4389 ( 2019 ) barticle

    2019

  51. [59]

    , Fan , X

    barticle Liu , R. , Fan , X. , Zhu , M. , Hou , M. , Luo , Z. : Real-world underwater enhancement: Challenges, benchmarks, and solutions under natural light . IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 30 ( 12 ), 4861 -- 4875 ( 2020 ) barticle

    2020

  52. [60]

    , Li , J

    botherref Li , H. , Li , J. , Wang , W. : A fusion adversarial underwater image enhancement network with a public test dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.06819 (2019) botherref

    2019 arXiv

  53. [61]

    , Xia , Y

    barticle Islam , M.J. , Xia , Y. , Sattar , J. : Fast underwater image enhancement for improved visual perception . IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5 ( 2 ), 3227 -- 3234 ( 2020 ) barticle

    2020

  54. [62]

    , Anguelov , D

    bchapter Liu , W. , Anguelov , D. , Erhan , D. , Szegedy , C. , Reed , S. , Fu , C.-Y. , Berg , A.C. : Ssd: Single shot multibox detector . In: Computer Vision--ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11--14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14 , pp. ...

    2016

  55. [63]

    , Wen , L

    bchapter Zhang , S. , Wen , L. , Bian , X. , Lei , Z. , Li , S.Z. : Single-shot refinement neural network for object detection . In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 4203 -- 4212 ( 2018 ) bchapter

    2018

  56. [64]

    , Lee , H.S

    bchapter Kim , K. , Lee , H.S. : Probabilistic anchor assignment with iou prediction for object detection . In: European Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 355 -- 371 ( 2020 ). Springer bchapter

    2020

  57. [65]

    , Zhou , Q

    bchapter Wang , Y. , Zhou , Q. , Liu , J. , Xiong , J. , Gao , G. , Wu , X. , Latecki , L.J. : Lednet: A lightweight encoder-decoder network for real-time semantic segmentation . In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) , pp. 1860 -- 1864 ( 2019 ). IEE...

    2019

  58. [66]

    , Tang , S

    barticle Wu , T. , Tang , S. , Zhang , R. , Cao , J. , Zhang , Y. : Cgnet: A light-weight context guided network for semantic segmentation . IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 30 , 1169 -- 1179 ( 2020 ) barticle

    2020

  59. [67]

    : Underwater Object Detection Dataset

    botherref Prytula , S. : Underwater Object Detection Dataset. https://public.roboflow.com/object-detection/aquarium (2020) botherref

    2020

  60. [68]

    , Sowmya , A

    barticle Yang , M. , Sowmya , A. : An underwater color image quality evaluation metric . IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 24 ( 12 ), 6062 -- 6071 ( 2015 ) barticle

    2015

  61. [69]

    , Gao , C

    barticle Panetta , K. , Gao , C. , Agaian , S. : Human-visual-system-inspired underwater image quality measures . IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 41 ( 3 ), 541 -- 551 ( 2015 ) barticle

    2015

  62. [70]

    , Ma , K

    barticle Fang , Y. , Ma , K. , Wang , Z. , Lin , W. , Fang , Z. , Zhai , G. : No-reference quality assessment of contrast-distorted images based on natural scene statistics . IEEE Signal Processing Letters 22 ( 7 ), 838 -- 842 ( 2014 ) barticle

    2014

  63. [71]

    , Bovik , A.C

    barticle Wang , Z. , Bovik , A.C. , Sheikh , H.R. , Simoncelli , E.P. : Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity . IEEE transactions on image processing 13 ( 4 ), 600 -- 612 ( 2004 ) barticle

    2004

  64. [72]

    , Shoeiby , M

    botherref Han , J. , Shoeiby , M. , Malthus , T. , Botha , E. , Anstee , J. , Anwar , S. , Wei , R. , Armin , M.A. , Li , H. , Petersson , L. : Underwater image restoration via contrastive learning and a real-world dataset. Remote Sensing (2022) botherref

    2022

  65. [73]

    , Wu , L

    botherref Li , K. , Wu , L. , Qi , Q. , Liu , W. , Gao , X. , Zhou , L. , Song , D. : Beyond single reference for training: underwater image enhancement via comparative learning. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2022) botherref

    2022

  66. [74]

    , Li , Z

    barticle Xue , X. , Li , Z. , Ma , L. , Jia , Q. , Liu , R. , Fan , X. : Investigating intrinsic degradation factors by multi-branch aggregation for real-world underwater image enhancement . Pattern Recognition 133 , 109041 ( 2023 ) barticle

    2023

  67. [75]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION string.to.integer 't := t text.length 'k := #1 'char.num := t char.num #1 substring 's := s is.num s "." = or char.num k = not and char.num #1 + 'char.num := while char.num #1 - 'char.num := t #1 char.num substring FUNCTI...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.