Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 111 references

Fractional instantons in 2d $\mathbb{C}P^{N-1}$ model and 4d Yang-Mills theory with 't Hooft twists

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Fractional BPS lumps in the CP^{N-1} model have moduli space isomorphic to (CP^{Nk+p-1} × T-hat-hat^2)/(Z_s × Z_c), a Kähler manifold of dimension Nk+p.

desk verdict A careful, likely correct construction of fractional lump moduli on twisted tori, with one unproven PDE uniqueness lemma holding the bridge. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12802 v1 pith:U72ANSRF submitted 2025-07-17 hep-th

Yui Hayashi , Tatsuhiro Misumi , Muneto Nitta , Keisuke Ohashi , Yuya Tanizaki This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords fractionalinstantonsBPSlumpsCP^{N-1}model'tHoofttwistmodulispacethetafunctionsYang-Millstheorytorus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper works out the full geometry of fractional BPS lumps (fractional instantons) in the two-dimensional $CP^{{N-1}}$ model on a torus with shift-clock twisted boundary conditions. After regularizing the model by an N-component Abelian-Higgs theory, it shows that the topological charge is fractionalized to k+p/N and that the moduli space of solutions is a Kähler manifold of complex dimension Nk+p, exactly as the index theorem predicts. The paper gives explicit $\theta$-function formulas for all solutions and identifies the moduli space globally as a $CP^{{Nk+p-1}}$-fiber bundle over a small torus, with the 't Hooft twist parameters appearing as discrete identifications on the fiber. It also shows that the same moduli space arises from fractional instantons in 4d SU(N) Yang-Mills theory on a twisted $T^{4}$ after dimensional reduction, so the result is robust for the physically relevant non-Fubini-Study metric.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the holomorphic ansatz for BPS solutions: writing the Higgs field as H = $\sqrt$(ξ) $e^{{-ψ}}$ h(z) with h an N-component vector of entire functions and ψ fixed by the Taubes-type equation (∂$_1^{2}$+∂$_2^{2}$) Re ψ = $e^{2}$ ξ(1 - $e^{{-2Re ψ}}$|h|^2), together with the pseudo-periodic boundary conditions that encode the shift and clock twists. The moduli space is then the space of such h modulo the V-transformation, which multiplies h by an entire function while shifting the holomorphic transition functions accordingly. The key technical step is the product-to-sum formula for $\theta$ functions, which converts the zero-based parametrization into the linear basis (4.11); the automorphism identities of the $\theta$ basis make the discrete identifications Z_s and Z_c explicit and reveal the global fiber-bundle structure.

What would settle it

Find a holomorphic vector h satisfying the pseudo-periodic boundary conditions with a strict Bradlow bound for which the Taubes-type equation (2.30) has two distinct solutions ψ₁ ≠ ψ₂ (or none). If such a case exists, the moduli space would carry extra data beyond the holomorphic data, and the claimed isomorphism with ($CP^{{M-1}}$ × T-hat-$hat^{2}$)/(Z_s × Z_c) would fail for that twist sector; a numerical search on a small twisted torus with N=2, k=1 would be a concrete test.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the moduli space M_{N;(ps,pc)}^k of fractional BPS lumps with topological charge k+p/N is isomorphic to ($CP^{{M-1}}$ × T-hat-$hat^{2}$)/(Z_s × Z_c) with M = Nk+p, where T-hat-$hat^{2}$ is the doubly-extended torus and Z_s, Z_c are discrete identifications induced by the shift and clock twists. This is established by constructing all holomorphic solutions h(z) with pseudo-periodic boundary conditions using Jacobi $\theta$ functions, then switching to a linear parametrization via the $\theta$ basis ϑ_n^K for which the quotient structure is manifest. The paper thereby realizes the index-theorem dimension M = Nk+p as an explicit Kähler moduli space for every twist pair (ps, pc), including fractional charge sectors, and proves that the moduli space is a global $CP^{{M-1}}$-fiber bundle over the tiny torus C/((N/M)Z + (N/M)τ Z).

Load-bearing premise

The whole identification of the moduli space with the quotient over holomorphic vectors h(z) rests on the assumption that, whenever the Bradlow bound is strict, the Taubes-type equation (2.30) has one and only one solution ψ for each h — an existence and uniqueness statement the paper admits is not mathematically rigorous enough for full acceptance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The index-theorem dimension Nk+p is realized by an explicit Kähler moduli space for every shift-clock twist pair, so fractional charge sectors have a well-defined geometric description.
  • The moduli space is a global CP^{M-1}-fiber bundle over the tiny torus C/((N/M)Z + (N/M)τ Z), making the topology of fractional lump configurations computable.
  • The two parametrizations (zero-based and theta-basis) are related by a bijection, so the small-lump singularity appears only when the holomorphic vector has a common zero for all flavors, which is absent for minimal fractional instantons with k=0.
  • In the CP^{N-1} limit the moduli space is the closure of the true one; the paper identifies the small-lump singularities as boundary points and gives a necessary condition (rank A > 1) for their absence.
  • The same moduli space arises from 4d SU(N) Yang-Mills theory on T^4 with intersecting 't Hooft fluxes after dimensional reduction and tuning the aspect ratio, so the qualitative topology is independent of the non-Fubini-Study metric.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the moduli-space identification is correct, the low-energy (Manton) dynamics of fractional lumps is a quantum particle on a Kähler manifold with a global CP^{M-1} fiber, which could be used to compute corrections to the semiclassical fractional-instanton description on small tori.
  • The result suggests an explicit bridge between the 2d CP^{N-1} fractional instantons and the 4d fractional instantons (’t Hooft torons) at tuned aspect ratios; a testable next step is to compare the Kähler metric induced by the non-Fubini-Study reduction with the metric derived from the Taubes functional on the same moduli space.
  • The product-to-sum formula effectively provides an algebraic-geometry isomorphism from the symmetric product of the torus to CP^{M-1}; for higher k the paper leaves open the complete removal of small-lump singularities, so one could check numerically whether the rank condition rank A = k is also sufficient for regularity beyond k=2.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies BPS fractional instantons (fractional lumps) in the 2d CP^{N-1} model regularized as an N-component Abelian-Higgs model on a torus with shift-clock twisted boundary conditions. The central objects are the holomorphic data h(z) with pseudo-periodic boundary conditions, subject to a Taubes-type equation for the remaining field ψ. The authors construct explicit solutions using theta functions, identify the zero structure via a modified Abel theorem, and then use a product-to-sum formula to obtain a linear parametrization of the moduli space. The main claimed result is that, for topological charge k+p/N with M=Nk+p, the moduli space is globally a CP^{M-1}-fiber bundle over the tiny torus C/(N/M Z + N/M τ Z), equivalently the quotient in Eq. (4.19). They also derive modular-transformation properties and compare the result with moduli spaces of 't Hooft torons obtained by dimensional reduction from 4d SU(N) Yang-Mills theory, finding agreement for the minimal fractional-charge cases.

Significance. If correct, the paper gives the first explicit global description of the moduli space of fractional BPS lumps for all twist pairs (ps,pc), matching the index-theory dimension M=Nk+p. The explicit theta-function solutions and the alternative linear parametrization are concrete and checkable, and the paper verifies several consistency limits: the periodic limit reproduces the known moduli space of Ref. [51], the one-dimensional limits recover the cylinder fractional instantons of Refs. [44,45], and the dimension counts (3.15) and (3.30) agree with the index theorem. The comparison with 4d Yang-Mills 't Hooft torons is a useful independent cross-check, and the modular-duality formulas are elegant. The main weakness is mathematical rigor of the PDE existence/uniqueness step, which is load-bearing for the moduli-space identification.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 2.3 and Appendix A.1, Eq. (2.30)] The reduction to the holomorphic quotient (2.31), and therefore the global moduli-space formula (4.19), requires existence and uniqueness of Re ψ solving the Taubes-type equation (2.30) with pseudo-periodic boundary conditions for every admissible h(z), whenever the Bradlow bound (2.21) is strict. The authors state in Appendix A.1 that the convexity/coercivity argument is "not mathematically rigorous enough to be fully accepted by mathematicians," and no external existence/uniqueness theorem is invoked for this twisted-torus problem. If uniqueness failed, the physical fields (H,A) would carry extra continuous data not captured by the holomorphic quotient; if existence failed, the claimed dimension M=Nk+p would not be realized. The reference function ω0=log|h0|^2 used in Eq. (A.5) also needs justification when M>0, since a nowhere-vanishing holomorphic section of a positive-degree line bundle does not exist. Please close this gap, either by a complete proof for the pseudo-periodic case or by recasting the problem as a standard vortex equation on a holomorphic line bundle of degree M and invoking the Bradlow/Garcia-Prada existence-uniqueness theory (adapted to the vector-valued h).
  2. [Abstract, Summary, and Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.19)] The abstract and title present Eq. (4.19) as the moduli space of fractional BPS lumps in the CP^{N-1} model, but (4.19) is the moduli space of the extended Abelian-Higgs model. The authors themselves note in Sec. 4.2 that the true CP^{N-1} moduli space requires removing the small-lump singularities where h(z0)=0. For general (ps,pc) this singular locus is not determined; the only explicit criterion is given for the periodic case ps=pc=0 via Im(ϑ)∩Ker(A)=∅. Please state in the abstract and introduction that the result is the moduli space of the regularized Abelian-Higgs model and its closure in the CP limit, or supply a characterization of the small-lump singularities for general twists. This does not invalidate the construction, but it is essential for knowing exactly which mathematical statement is being claimed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (4.14)] The subscript in "An− N/gcd(N,ps) ¯a" is ambiguous; please define the index shift on A explicitly, including the wrap-around modulo \hat M, and make clear whether the shift depends on \bar a.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. 5] The statement that the moduli space obtained from 4d Yang-Mills theory "coincides with" the CP^{N-1} moduli space is established only for k=0, (ps,pc)=(p,1), and at the tuned aspect ratio; the higher-charge cases are explicitly left open in Sec. 5.3. The abstract should be qualified accordingly.
  3. [Sec. 3.1.1-3.1.3] The zero-counting arguments assume each ha(z) is not identically zero, but the coefficients ca in Eq. (3.28) may vanish. This is covered by continuity and by the linear parametrization of Sec. 4.2, but the assumption should be stated explicitly where the zero set and the modified Abel theorem are used.
  4. [Appendix A.1, Eq. (A.5)] The nature of h0 in ω0=log|h0|^2 should be clarified: is it a smooth nowhere-vanishing section of the relevant vector bundle, or a holomorphic section? The existence of such an h0 with the required pseudo-periodicities is not self-evident for M>0 and should be justified or avoided by using a different reference function.
  5. [Figure 1] The caption does not define the normalization of the plotted density ρ or the color scale; adding this information would make the numerical comparison of the cases more transparent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the moduli space is derived from explicit holomorphic data, with the index theorem used only as a consistency check.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Eq. (4.19), is obtained by an explicit construction rather than by assuming the result. Starting from the twisted boundary conditions, the flux quantization (2.16) gives the fractional charge k+p/N. The BPS ansatz (2.23)-(2.24) reduces the problem to holomorphic data h(z), and the zero-counting argument in Appendix B.1 independently yields M=Nk+p = gcd(N,ps) * M/gcd(N,ps) zeros, not by invoking the index theorem. The theta-function product-to-sum formula (4.8)/(C.15) then maps the zero parametrization to linear coefficients A_{n\bar a}, and the quotient by Z_s and Z_c in (4.13)-(4.14) produces the CP^{M-1}-fiber bundle over the tiny torus. The dimension M=Nk+p is therefore a derived output, and the index theorem is used only as a posteriori confirmation. The derivation is self-contained apart from a genuine analytic caveat: Appendix A.1 concedes that existence and uniqueness of ψ solving the Taubes-type equation (2.30) is argued by convexity/coercivity and is 'not mathematically rigorous enough to be fully accepted by mathematicians'. This is a rigor limitation, not circularity, because the moduli space identification would fail if uniqueness failed, but the paper does not define the moduli space in terms of the claimed answer. Self-citations such as [44,45,57,75] provide context, technique, and comparison solutions, but the load-bearing construction is explicit in the present paper, including the independent 't Hooft-toron moduli computation in Section 5.2, which agrees with Eq. (4.19) rather than being presupposed by it.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard theta-function and vortex-equation mathematics rather than on fitted parameters. No numbers are fitted to data. The main non-standard input is the asserted existence and uniqueness of the auxiliary function psi (Appendix A), which the authors flag as not fully rigorous, and the Section 5 identification relies on an external uniqueness theorem plus an explicitly stated continuity assumption.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of the solution psi to the Taubes-type equation (2.30) under pseudo-periodic boundary conditions whenever the Bradlow bound is strict.
    Section 2.3 and Appendix A: the moduli space identification (2.31) with the quotient over holomorphic h requires unique Re psi for each h. The authors flag the proof as not mathematically rigorous.
  • standard math The index-theorem dimension formula dim_C M = Nk + p, Eq. (2.33).
    Quoted as a standard result; the paper verifies its explicit constructions match it (Eqs. (3.15), (3.30)), so the formula serves as an external benchmark rather than an input.
  • standard math The theta-function product-to-sum identity and the isomorphism T^(2(K-1))/S_K to CP^(K-1) of Appendix C, built on Refs. [42,107].
    Proved in Appendix C using standard theta-function theory and classical algebraic geometry; it underlies the alternative moduli parametrization (4.11).
  • domain assumption At the tuned aspect ratio LALD/LBLC = 1/(N-p), the 't Hooft constant-field-strength solutions are the only self-dual solutions, and tuning the aspect ratio does not change the global structure of the moduli space.
    Section 5.2: the moduli coincidence between the dimensionally reduced model and the standard CP^(N-1) model rests on the external uniqueness result of Ref. [41] and an explicitly stated continuity assumption.
  • domain assumption The strict Bradlow bound L1 L2 xi > (2 pi/e^2)(k + p/N), Eq. (2.21).
    Needed to ensure |H| is not identically zero and for psi solvability; guaranteed in the CP^(N-1) limit e^2 L1 L2 to infinity, which is the limit of interest.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractional instantons in 2d $\mathbb{C}P^{N-1}$ model and 4d Yang-Mills theory with 't Hooft twists." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U72ANSRF

@misc{pith2026250712802,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractional instantons in 2d $\mathbbCP^N-1$ model and 4d Yang-Mills theory with 't Hooft twists},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U72ANSRF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12802}
}
abstract

We derive the explicit formula for fractional BPS lumps (or fractional instantons) in the $\mathbb{C}P^{N-1}$ nonlinear sigma model on a two-dimensional torus under various shift-clock twisted boundary conditions. After regularizing the $\mathbb{C}P^{N-1}$ model by an $N$-component Abelian-Higgs model, those twisted boundary conditions introduce nontrivial 't~Hooft fluxes $p/N$ for the $U(1)$ gauge field, and the topological charge becomes fractionalized as $k+p/N\in \mathbb{Z}+p/N$. The moduli space is globally determined as the $\mathbb{C}P^{Nk+p-1}$-fiber bundle on a $2$-torus, which is a K\"ahler manifold of complex dimension $Nk + p$ as predicted by the index theorem. We present two different parametrizations of the moduli space: one of them immediately identifies the small-lump singularity appearing in the $\mathbb{C}P^{N-1}$ limit, while the other makes the modular invariance manifest. We also discuss the implications of our finding for the $4$d $SU(N)$ Yang-Mills theory on the $4$-torus with 't~Hooft twists. By tuning the aspect ratio of the 4-torus, fractional instantons in the $\mathbb{C}P^{N-1}$ model with a non-Fubini-Study metric are obtained through the dimensional reduction of $4$d Yang-Mills theory, whose moduli space coincides with the one obtained for the standard $\mathbb{C}P^{N-1}$ model as complex manifolds.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [51]

    Nahm Transform and Moduli Spaces of CPn Models on the Torus

    M. Aguado, M. Asorey, and A. Wipf, “Nahm transform and moduli spaces of CP**N models on the torus,”Annals Phys. 298 (2002) 2–23, arXiv:hep-th/0107258

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  2. [1]

    Pseudoparticle Solutions of the Yang-Mills Equations,

    A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, A. S. Schwartz, and Yu. S. Tyupkin, “Pseudoparticle Solutions of the Yang-Mills Equations,”Phys. Lett. B59 (1975) 85–87

    1975

  3. [2]

    Monopoles and instantons on partially compactified D-branes,

    K.-M. Lee and P. Yi, “Monopoles and instantons on partially compactified D-branes,”Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 3711–3717, arXiv:hep-th/9702107 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1997

  4. [3]

    SU(2) calorons and magnetic monopoles,

    K.-M. Lee and C.-h. Lu, “SU(2) calorons and magnetic monopoles,”Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 025011, arXiv:hep-th/9802108 [hep-th] . – 51 –

    arXiv 1998

  5. [4]

    Instantons and magnetic monopoles on R**3 x S**1 with arbitrary simple gauge groups,

    K.-M. Lee, “Instantons and magnetic monopoles on R**3 x S**1 with arbitrary simple gauge groups,” Phys. Lett. B426 (1998) 323–328, arXiv:hep-th/9802012 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1998

  6. [5]

    Exact T duality between calorons and Taub - NUT spaces,

    T. C. Kraan and P. van Baal, “Exact T duality between calorons and Taub - NUT spaces,” Phys. Lett. B428 (1998) 268–276, arXiv:hep-th/9802049 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1998

  7. [6]

    Periodic instantons with nontrivial holonomy,

    T. C. Kraan and P. van Baal, “Periodic instantons with nontrivial holonomy,”Nucl. Phys. B533 (1998) 627–659, arXiv:hep-th/9805168 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [7]

    Monopole constituents inside SU(n) calorons,

    T. C. Kraan and P. van Baal, “Monopole constituents inside SU(n) calorons,”Phys. Lett. B435 (1998) 389–395, arXiv:hep-th/9806034 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1998

Show all 111 references
  1. [8]

    QCD and Instantons at Finite Temperature,

    D. J. Gross, R. D. Pisarski, and L. G. Yaffe, “QCD and Instantons at Finite Temperature,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 53 (1981) 43

    1981

  2. [9]

    Gluino condensate and magnetic monopoles in supersymmetric gluodynamics,

    N. M. Davies, T. J. Hollowood, V. V. Khoze, and M. P. Mattis, “Gluino condensate and magnetic monopoles in supersymmetric gluodynamics,”Nucl. Phys. B 559 (1999) 123–142, arXiv:hep-th/9905015

    1999 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Monopoles, affine algebras and the gluino condensate,

    N. M. Davies, T. J. Hollowood, and V. V. Khoze, “Monopoles, affine algebras and the gluino condensate,” J. Math. Phys. 44 (2003) 3640–3656, arXiv:hep-th/0006011 [hep-th]

    2003 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Abelian duality, confinement, and chiral symmetry breaking in QCD(adj),

    M. Unsal, “Abelian duality, confinement, and chiral symmetry breaking in QCD(adj),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 032005, arXiv:0708.1772 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Magnetic bion condensation: A New mechanism of confinement and mass gap in four dimensions,

    M. Unsal, “Magnetic bion condensation: A New mechanism of confinement and mass gap in four dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 065001, arXiv:0709.3269 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  6. [13]

    QCD-like Theories on R(3) x S(1): A Smooth Journey from Small to Large r(S(1)) with Double-Trace Deformations,

    M. Shifman and M. Unsal, “QCD-like Theories on R(3) x S(1): A Smooth Journey from Small to Large r(S(1)) with Double-Trace Deformations,”Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 065004, arXiv:0802.1232 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  7. [14]

    On the fractional instanton liquid picture of the Yang-Mills vacuum and Confinement,

    A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, “On the fractional instanton liquid picture of the Yang-Mills vacuum and Confinement,” arxiv:2302.12356 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    Notes on Confinement on R3× S1: From Yang–Mills, Super-Yang–Mills, and QCD (adj) to QCD(F),

    E. Poppitz, “Notes on Confinement on R3× S1: From Yang–Mills, Super-Yang–Mills, and QCD (adj) to QCD(F),”Symmetry 14 no. 1, (2022) 180,arXiv:2111.10423 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Center vortex and confinement in Yang-Mills theory and QCD with anomaly-preserving compactifications,

    Y. Tanizaki and M. Ünsal, “Center vortex and confinement in Yang-Mills theory and QCD with anomaly-preserving compactifications,”PTEP 2022 (2022) 04A108, arXiv:2201.06166 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Semiclassics with ’t Hooft flux background for QCD with 2-index quarks,

    Y. Tanizaki and M. Ünsal, “Semiclassics with ’t Hooft flux background for QCD with 2-index quarks,” JHEP 08 (2022) 038, arXiv:2205.11339 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Semiclassical analysis of the bifundamental QCD on R2 × T 2 with ’t Hooft flux,

    Y. Hayashi, Y. Tanizaki, and H. Watanabe, “Semiclassical analysis of the bifundamental QCD on R2 × T 2 with ’t Hooft flux,”JHEP 10 (2023) 146, arXiv:2307.13954 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Semiclassics for the QCD vacuum structure through T2-compactification with the baryon-’t Hooft flux,

    Y. Hayashi and Y. Tanizaki, “Semiclassics for the QCD vacuum structure through T2-compactification with the baryon-’t Hooft flux,”JHEP 08 (2024) 001, arXiv:2402.04320 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Non-supersymmetric duality cascade of QCD(BF) via semiclassics onR2× T2 with the baryon-’t Hooft flux,

    Y. Hayashi, Y. Tanizaki, and H. Watanabe, “Non-supersymmetric duality cascade of QCD(BF) via semiclassics onR2× T2 with the baryon-’t Hooft flux,”JHEP 07 (2024) 033, arXiv:2404.16803 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Selfdual vortex - like configurations in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory,

    A. Gonzalez-Arroyo and A. Montero, “Selfdual vortex - like configurations in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory,”Phys. Lett. B 442 (1998) 273–278, arXiv:hep-th/9809037. – 52 –

    1998 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Study of SU(3) vortex - like configurations with a new maximal center gauge fixing method,

    A. Montero, “Study of SU(3) vortex - like configurations with a new maximal center gauge fixing method,” Phys. Lett. B 467 (1999) 106–111, arXiv:hep-lat/9906010

    1999 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Vortex configurations in the large N limit,

    A. Montero, “Vortex configurations in the large N limit,”Phys. Lett. B 483 (2000) 309–314, arXiv:hep-lat/0004002

    2000 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Numerical fractional instantons in SU(2): center vortices, monopoles, and a sharp transition between them,

    F. D. Wandler, “Numerical fractional instantons in SU(2): center vortices, monopoles, and a sharp transition between them,”arXiv:2406.07636 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  18. [25]

    Minimum Action Solutions for SU(2) Gauge Theory on the Torus With Nonorthogonal Twist,

    M. Garcia Perez, A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, and B. Soderberg, “Minimum Action Solutions for SU(2) Gauge Theory on the Torus With Nonorthogonal Twist,”Phys. Lett. B 235 (1990) 117–123

    1990

  19. [26]

    Numerical study of Yang-Mills classical solutions on the twisted torus,

    M. Garcia Perez and A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, “Numerical study of Yang-Mills classical solutions on the twisted torus,”J. Phys. A 26 no. FTUAM-92-08, (1993) 2667–2678, arxiv:hep-lat/9206016

    1993 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Fractional instanton of the SU(3) gauge theory in weak coupling regime,

    E. Itou, “Fractional instanton of the SU(3) gauge theory in weak coupling regime,”JHEP 05 (2019) 093, arxiv:1811.05708 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Constituents of doubly periodic instantons,

    C. Ford and J. M. Pawlowski, “Constituents of doubly periodic instantons,”Phys. Lett. B 540 (2002) 153–158, arXiv:hep-th/0205116

    2002 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Doubly periodic instantons and their constituents,

    C. Ford and J. M. Pawlowski, “Doubly periodic instantons and their constituents,”Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 065006, arXiv:hep-th/0302117

    2004 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Doubly periodic instanton zero modes,

    C. Ford and J. M. Pawlowski, “Doubly periodic instanton zero modes,”Phys. Lett. B 626 (2005) 139–146, arXiv:hep-th/0505214

    2005 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Unifying Monopole and Center Vortex as the Semiclassical Confinement Mechanism,

    Y. Hayashi and Y. Tanizaki, “Unifying Monopole and Center Vortex as the Semiclassical Confinement Mechanism,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 17, (2024) 171902,arXiv:2405.12402 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [32]

    The metamorphosis of semi-classical mechanisms of confinement: from monopoles onR3 × S1 to center-vortices onR2 × T2,

    C. Güvendik, T. Schaefer, and M. Ünsal, “The metamorphosis of semi-classical mechanisms of confinement: from monopoles onR3 × S1 to center-vortices onR2 × T2,” JHEP 11 (2024) 163, arXiv:2405.13696 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Monopole-vortex continuity ofN = 1 super Yang-Mills theory onR2 × S1 × S1 with ’t Hooft twist,

    Y. Hayashi, T. Misumi, and Y. Tanizaki, “Monopole-vortex continuity ofN = 1 super Yang-Mills theory onR2 × S1 × S1 with ’t Hooft twist,”JHEP 05 (2025) 194, arXiv:2410.21392 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Center-vortex semiclassics with non-minimal ’t Hooft fluxes onR2 × T 2 and center stabilization at largeN,

    Y. Hayashi, Y. Tanizaki, and M. Ünsal, “Center-vortex semiclassics with non-minimal ’t Hooft fluxes onR2 × T 2 and center stabilization at largeN,” arXiv:2505.07467 [hep-th]

  28. [35]

    Construction of Instantons,

    M. F. Atiyah, N. J. Hitchin, V. G. Drinfeld, and Y. I. Manin, “Construction of Instantons,” Phys. Lett. A 65 (1978) 185–187

    1978

  29. [36]

    A Simple Formalism for the BPS Monopole,

    W. Nahm, “A Simple Formalism for the BPS Monopole,”Phys. Lett. B 90 (1980) 413–414

    1980

  30. [37]

    The gaugino condensate from asymmetric four-torus with twists,

    M. M. Anber and E. Poppitz, “The gaugino condensate from asymmetric four-torus with twists,” JHEP 01 (2023) 118, arxiv:2210.13568 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Multi-fractional instantons in SU(N) Yang-Mills theory on the twisted T4,

    M. M. Anber and E. Poppitz, “Multi-fractional instantons in SU(N) Yang-Mills theory on the twisted T4,” JHEP 09 (2023) 095, arxiv:2307.04795 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Higher-order gaugino condensates on a twistedT4: In the beginning, there was semi-classics,

    M. M. Anber and E. Poppitz, “Higher-order gaugino condensates on a twistedT4: In the beginning, there was semi-classics,”arXiv:2408.16058 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  33. [40]

    The Nahm transform of multi-fractional instantons,

    M. M. Anber and E. Poppitz, “The Nahm transform of multi-fractional instantons,”JHEP 04 (2025) 031, arXiv:2411.11962 [hep-th] . – 53 –

    2025 arXiv

  34. [41]

    On the moduli space of multi-fractional instantons on the twistedT4,

    M. M. Anber, A. A. Cox, and E. Poppitz, “On the moduli space of multi-fractional instantons on the twistedT4,” arXiv:2504.06344 [hep-th]

  35. [42]

    From 4d Yang-Mills to 2dCPN −1 model: IR problem and confinement at weak coupling,

    M. Yamazaki and K. Yonekura, “From 4d Yang-Mills to 2dCPN −1 model: IR problem and confinement at weak coupling,”JHEP 07 (2017) 088, arXiv:1704.05852 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  36. [43]

    The mixed 0-form/1-form anomaly in Hilbert space: pouring the new wine into old bottles,

    A. A. Cox, E. Poppitz, and F. D. Wandler, “The mixed 0-form/1-form anomaly in Hilbert space: pouring the new wine into old bottles,”JHEP 10 (2021) 069, arXiv:2106.11442 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Instantons in the Higgs phase,

    M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, and N. Sakai, “Instantons in the Higgs phase,” Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 025011, arXiv:hep-th/0412048 [hep-th]

    2005 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Non-Abelian vortices on cylinder: Duality between vortices and walls,

    M. Eto, T. Fujimori, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, K. Ohta, and N. Sakai, “Non-Abelian vortices on cylinder: Duality between vortices and walls,”Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 085008, arXiv:hep-th/0601181 [hep-th]

    2006 arXiv

  39. [46]

    On a Generalized Fourier Transform of Instantons Over Flat Tori,

    H. Schenk, “On a Generalized Fourier Transform of Instantons Over Flat Tori,”Commun. Math. Phys. 116 (1988) 177

    1988

  40. [47]

    Nahm’s Transformation for Instantons,

    P. J. Braam and P. van Baal, “Nahm’s Transformation for Instantons,”Commun. Math. Phys. 122 (1989) 267

    1989

  41. [48]

    The CP1 Model on the Torus: Contribution of Instantons,

    J.-L. Richard and A. Rouet, “The CP1 Model on the Torus: Contribution of Instantons,” Nucl. Phys. B 211 (1983) 447–464

    1983

  42. [49]

    Lump dynamics in the CP**1 model on the torus,

    J. M. Speight, “Lump dynamics in the CP**1 model on the torus,”Commun. Math. Phys. 194 (1998) 513–539, arXiv:hep-th/9707101

    1998 arXiv

  43. [50]

    The Deformed conifold as a geometry on the space of unit charge CP**1 lumps,

    J. M. Speight, “The Deformed conifold as a geometry on the space of unit charge CP**1 lumps,” Phys. Lett. B 511 (2001) 295–301, arXiv:hep-th/0105142

    2001 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Sigma Model BPS Lumps on Torus,

    A. Nakamula and S. Sasaki, “Sigma Model BPS Lumps on Torus,”Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 065017, arXiv:1205.5940 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Vortices, instantons and branes,

    A. Hanany and D. Tong, “Vortices, instantons and branes,”JHEP 07 (2003) 037, arXiv:hep-th/0306150

    2003 arXiv

  46. [54]

    NonAbelian superconductors: Vortices and confinement in N=2 SQCD,

    R. Auzzi, S. Bolognesi, J. Evslin, K. Konishi, and A. Yung, “NonAbelian superconductors: Vortices and confinement in N=2 SQCD,”Nucl. Phys. B 673 (2003) 187–216, arXiv:hep-th/0307287

    2003 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Moduli space of non-Abelian vortices,

    M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, and N. Sakai, “Moduli space of non-Abelian vortices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 161601, arXiv:hep-th/0511088

    2006 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Non-Abelian Vortices of Higher Winding Numbers,

    M. Eto, K. Konishi, G. Marmorini, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, W. Vinci, and N. Yokoi, “Non-Abelian Vortices of Higher Winding Numbers,”Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 065021, arXiv:hep-th/0607070

    2006 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Solitons in the Higgs phase: The Moduli matrix approach,

    M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, and N. Sakai, “Solitons in the Higgs phase: The Moduli matrix approach,”J. Phys. A39 (2006) R315–R392, arXiv:hep-th/0602170 [hep-th]

    2006 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Supersymmetric Solitons and How They Help Us Understand Non-Abelian Gauge Theories,

    M. Shifman and A. Yung, “Supersymmetric Solitons and How They Help Us Understand Non-Abelian Gauge Theories,”Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 (2007) 1139, arXiv:hep-th/0703267

    2007 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Shifman and A

    M. Shifman and A. Yung,Supersymmetric Solitons. Cambridge University Press, 2009. – 54 –

    2009

  52. [60]

    Semi-superfluid strings in high density QCD,

    A. P. Balachandran, S. Digal, and T. Matsuura, “Semi-superfluid strings in high density QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 074009, arXiv:hep-ph/0509276

    2006 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Non-Abelian strings in high density QCD: Zero modes and interactions,

    E. Nakano, M. Nitta, and T. Matsuura, “Non-Abelian strings in high density QCD: Zero modes and interactions,”Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 045002, arXiv:0708.4096 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Color Magnetic Flux Tubes in Dense QCD,

    M. Eto and M. Nitta, “Color Magnetic Flux Tubes in Dense QCD,”Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 125007, arXiv:0907.1278 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Effective world-sheet theory of color magnetic flux tubes in dense QCD,

    M. Eto, E. Nakano, and M. Nitta, “Effective world-sheet theory of color magnetic flux tubes in dense QCD,”Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 125011, arXiv:0908.4470 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Instabilities of Non-Abelian Vortices in Dense QCD,

    M. Eto, M. Nitta, and N. Yamamoto, “Instabilities of Non-Abelian Vortices in Dense QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 161601, arXiv:0912.1352 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Vortices and Other Topological Solitons in Dense Quark Matter,

    M. Eto, Y. Hirono, M. Nitta, and S. Yasui, “Vortices and Other Topological Solitons in Dense Quark Matter,”PTEP 2014 no. 1, (2014) 012D01,arXiv:1308.1535 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Vortex strings and four-dimensional gauge dynamics,

    A. Hanany and D. Tong, “Vortex strings and four-dimensional gauge dynamics,”JHEP 04 (2004) 066, arXiv:hep-th/0403158

    2004 arXiv

  59. [67]

    NonAbelian string junctions as confined monopoles,

    M. Shifman and A. Yung, “NonAbelian string junctions as confined monopoles,”Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 045004, arXiv:hep-th/0403149

    2004 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Intersecting Solitons, Amoeba and Tropical Geometry,

    T. Fujimori, M. Nitta, K. Ohta, N. Sakai, and M. Yamazaki, “Intersecting Solitons, Amoeba and Tropical Geometry,”Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 105004, arXiv:0805.1194 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Statistical mechanics of vortices from D-branes and T-duality,

    M. Eto, T. Fujimori, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, K. Ohta, and N. Sakai, “Statistical mechanics of vortices from D-branes and T-duality,”Nucl. Phys. B 788 (2008) 120–136, arXiv:hep-th/0703197

    2008 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Monopoles in the higgs phase,

    D. Tong, “Monopoles in the higgs phase,”Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 065003, arXiv:hep-th/0307302

    2004 arXiv

  63. [71]

    All exact solutions of a 1/4 Bogomol’nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield equation,

    Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, and N. Sakai, “All exact solutions of a 1/4 Bogomol’nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield equation,”Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 065018, arXiv:hep-th/0405129

    2005 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Non-Abelian Monopoles in the Higgs Phase,

    M. Nitta and W. Vinci, “Non-Abelian Monopoles in the Higgs Phase,”Nucl. Phys. B 848 (2011) 121–154, arXiv:1012.4057 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Some Twisted Selfdual Solutions for the Yang-Mills Equations on a Hypertorus,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Some Twisted Selfdual Solutions for the Yang-Mills Equations on a Hypertorus,” Commun. Math. Phys. 81 (1981) 267–275

    1981

  66. [74]

    SU(N) Yang-Mills Solutions With Constant Field Strength onT 4,

    P. van Baal, “SU(N) Yang-Mills Solutions With Constant Field Strength onT 4,” Commun. Math. Phys. 94 (1984) 397

    1984

  67. [75]

    Moduli spaces of instantons in flag manifold sigma models. Vortices in quiver gauge theories,

    T. Fujimori, M. Nitta, and K. Ohashi, “Moduli spaces of instantons in flag manifold sigma models. Vortices in quiver gauge theories,”JHEP 02 (2024) 230, arXiv:2311.04508 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Vortices in holomorphic line bundles over closed Kahler manifolds,

    S. B. Bradlow, “Vortices in holomorphic line bundles over closed Kahler manifolds,” Commun. Math. Phys. 135 (1990) 1–17

    1990

  69. [77]

    Arbitrary N: Vortex Solutions to the First Order Landau-Ginzburg Equations,

    C. H. Taubes, “Arbitrary N: Vortex Solutions to the First Order Landau-Ginzburg Equations,” Commun. Math. Phys. 72 (1980) 277–292

    1980

  70. [78]

    A Remark on the Scattering of BPS Monopoles,

    N. S. Manton, “A Remark on the Scattering of BPS Monopoles,”Phys. Lett. B 110 (1982) 54–56. – 55 –

    1982

  71. [79]

    Manifestly supersymmetric effective Lagrangians on BPS solitons,

    M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, and N. Sakai, “Manifestly supersymmetric effective Lagrangians on BPS solitons,”Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 125008, arXiv:hep-th/0602289

    2006 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Resurgence and Trans-series in Quantum Field Theory: The CP(N-1) Model,

    G. V. Dunne and M. Unsal, “Resurgence and Trans-series in Quantum Field Theory: The CP(N-1) Model,” JHEP 11 (2012) 170, arXiv:1210.2423 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Continuity and Resurgence: towards a continuum definition of the CP(N-1) model,

    G. V. Dunne and M. Unsal, “Continuity and Resurgence: towards a continuum definition of the CP(N-1) model,” Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 025015, arXiv:1210.3646 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Neutral bions in theCP N −1 model,

    T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Neutral bions in theCP N −1 model,” JHEP 06 (2014) 164, arXiv:1404.7225 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Classifying bions in Grassmann sigma models and non-Abelian gauge theories by D-branes,

    T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Classifying bions in Grassmann sigma models and non-Abelian gauge theories by D-branes,”PTEP 2015 (2015) 033B02, arXiv:1409.3444 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Neutral bions in theCP N −1 model for resurgence,

    T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Neutral bions in theCP N −1 model for resurgence,”J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 597 no. 1, (2015) 012060,arXiv:1412.0861 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Resurgence in sine-Gordon quantum mechanics: Exact agreement between multi-instantons and uniform WKB,

    T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Resurgence in sine-Gordon quantum mechanics: Exact agreement between multi-instantons and uniform WKB,”JHEP 09 (2015) 157, arXiv:1507.00408 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Non-BPS exact solutions and their relation to bions in CP N −1 models,

    T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Non-BPS exact solutions and their relation to bions in CP N −1 models,” JHEP 05 (2016) 057, arXiv:1604.00839 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Nonperturbative contributions from complexified solutions inCP N −1models,

    T. Fujimori, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Nonperturbative contributions from complexified solutions inCP N −1models,” Phys. Rev. D94 no. 10, (2016) 105002, arXiv:1607.04205 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Exact resurgent trans-series and multibion contributions to all orders,

    T. Fujimori, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Exact resurgent trans-series and multibion contributions to all orders,”Phys. Rev. D95 no. 10, (2017) 105001, arXiv:1702.00589 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Resurgence Structure to All Orders of Multi-bions in Deformed SUSY Quantum Mechanics,

    T. Fujimori, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Resurgence Structure to All Orders of Multi-bions in Deformed SUSY Quantum Mechanics,”PTEP 2017 no. 8, (2017) 083B02, arXiv:1705.10483 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Bion non-perturbative contributions versus infrared renormalons in two-dimensionalCP N −1 models,

    T. Fujimori, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Bion non-perturbative contributions versus infrared renormalons in two-dimensionalCP N −1 models,” JHEP 02 (2019) 190, arXiv:1810.03768 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Confinement-deconfinement crossover in the latticeCP N −1 model,

    T. Fujimori, E. Itou, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Confinement-deconfinement crossover in the latticeCP N −1 model,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 9, (2019) 094506, arXiv:1907.06925 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Lattice study on the twisted CP N −1 models on R × S1,

    T. Misumi, T. Fujimori, E. Itou, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “Lattice study on the twisted CP N −1 models on R × S1,” PoS LA TTICE2019(2019) 015, arXiv:1911.07398 [hep-lat]

    2019 arXiv

  85. [93]

    LatticeCP N −1 model with ZN twisted boundary condition: bions, adiabatic continuity and pseudo-entropy,

    T. Fujimori, E. Itou, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, “LatticeCP N −1 model with ZN twisted boundary condition: bions, adiabatic continuity and pseudo-entropy,”JHEP 08 no. 08, (2020) 011,arXiv:2006.05106 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Quark-gluon thermodynamics with the Z(N(c)) symmetry,

    H. Kouno, Y. Sakai, T. Makiyama, K. Tokunaga, T. Sasaki, and M. Yahiro, “Quark-gluon thermodynamics with the Z(N(c)) symmetry,”J. Phys. G39 (2012) 085010. – 56 –

    2012

  87. [95]

    The quarkyonic phase and the ZNc symmetry,

    Y. Sakai, H. Kouno, T. Sasaki, and M. Yahiro, “The quarkyonic phase and the ZNc symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B718 (2012) 130–135, arXiv:1204.0228 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Confinement andZ3 symmetry in three-flavor QCD,

    H. Kouno, T. Makiyama, T. Sasaki, Y. Sakai, and M. Yahiro, “Confinement andZ3 symmetry in three-flavor QCD,”J. Phys. G40 (2013) 095003, arXiv:1301.4013 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Differences and similarities between fundamental and adjoint matters in SU(N) gauge theories,

    H. Kouno, T. Misumi, K. Kashiwa, T. Makiyama, T. Sasaki, and M. Yahiro, “Differences and similarities between fundamental and adjoint matters in SU(N) gauge theories,”Phys. Rev. D88 no. 1, (2013) 016002,arXiv:1304.3274 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Understanding QCD at high density from a Z3-symmetric QCD-like theory,

    H. Kouno, K. Kashiwa, J. Takahashi, T. Misumi, and M. Yahiro, “Understanding QCD at high density from a Z3-symmetric QCD-like theory,”Phys. Rev. D93 no. 5, (2016) 056009, arXiv:1504.07585 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Lattice study on QCD-like theory with exact center symmetry,

    T. Iritani, E. Itou, and T. Misumi, “Lattice study on QCD-like theory with exact center symmetry,” JHEP 11 (2015) 159, arXiv:1508.07132 [hep-lat]

    2015 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Order parameters and color-flavor center symmetry in QCD,

    A. Cherman, S. Sen, M. Unsal, M. L. Wagman, and L. G. Yaffe, “Order parameters and color-flavor center symmetry in QCD,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 22, (2017) 222001, arXiv:1706.05385 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Anomaly constraints on deconfinement and chiral phase transition,

    H. Shimizu and K. Yonekura, “Anomaly constraints on deconfinement and chiral phase transition,” Phys. Rev. D97 no. 10, (2018) 105011,arXiv:1706.06104 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Circle compactification and ’t Hooft anomaly,

    Y. Tanizaki, T. Misumi, and N. Sakai, “Circle compactification and ’t Hooft anomaly,” JHEP 12 (2017) 056, arXiv:1710.08923 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Anomaly matching for phase diagram of massless ZN-QCD,

    Y. Tanizaki, Y. Kikuchi, T. Misumi, and N. Sakai, “Anomaly matching for phase diagram of massless ZN-QCD,” Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 054012, arXiv:1711.10487 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Quantum Distillation of Hilbert Spaces, Semi-classics and Anomaly Matching,

    G. V. Dunne, Y. Tanizaki, and M. Ünsal, “Quantum Distillation of Hilbert Spaces, Semi-classics and Anomaly Matching,”JHEP 08 (2018) 068, arXiv:1803.02430 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Fractional Vortices and Lumps,

    M. Eto, T. Fujimori, S. B. Gudnason, K. Konishi, T. Nagashima, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, and W. Vinci, “Fractional Vortices and Lumps,”Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 045018, arXiv:0905.3540 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Stabilizing semilocal strings by polarization,

    M. Eto, M. Nitta, and K. Sakurai, “Stabilizing semilocal strings by polarization,”JHEP 10 (2016) 048, arXiv:1608.03516 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Griffiths and J

    P. Griffiths and J. Harris,Principles of Algebraic Geometry. Wiley Classics Library. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994

    1994

  100. [108]

    Some Results for SU(N) Gauge Fields on the Hypertorus,

    P. van Baal, “Some Results for SU(N) Gauge Fields on the Hypertorus,”Commun. Math. Phys. 85 (1982) 529

    1982

  101. [109]

    Some Analytic Results Concerning the Mass Spectrum of Yang-Mills Gauge Theories on a Torus,

    M. Luscher, “Some Analytic Results Concerning the Mass Spectrum of Yang-Mills Gauge Theories on a Torus,”Nucl. Phys. B 219 (1983) 233–261

    1983

  102. [110]

    QCD on a Torus and Electric Flux Energies From Tunneling,

    P. van Baal and J. Koller, “QCD on a Torus and Electric Flux Energies From Tunneling,” Annals Phys. 174 (1987) 299

    1987

  103. [111]

    Relations among topological solitons,

    M. Nitta, “Relations among topological solitons,”Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 10, (2022) 105006, arXiv:2202.03929 [hep-th] . – 57 –

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.