REVIEW 1 cited by
Active subspace methods in theory and practice: applications to kriging surfaces
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Many multivariate functions in engineering models vary primarily along a few directions in the space of input parameters. When these directions correspond to coordinate directions, one may apply global sensitivity measures to determine the most influential parameters. However, these methods perform poorly when the directions of variability are not aligned with the natural coordinates of the input space. We present a method to first detect the directions of the strongest variability using evaluations of the gradient and subsequently exploit these directions to construct a response surface on a low-dimensional subspace---i.e., the active subspace---of the inputs. We develop a theoretical framework with error bounds, and we link the theoretical quantities to the parameters of a kriging response surface on the active subspace. We apply the method to an elliptic PDE model with coefficients parameterized by 100 Gaussian random variables and compare it with a local sensitivity analysis method for dimension reduction.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bayesian and non-Bayesian multi-fidelity surrogate models for multi-objective aerodynamic optimization under extreme cost imbalance
AR1 co-kriging with Bayesian infill outperforms multi-fidelity neural networks with non-Bayesian infill on an outlet guide vane problem under a 20-sample high-fidelity budget, and POD dimension reduction improves ever...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.