pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19998 · v1 · pith:U7HT3IJ7new · submitted 2026-05-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Ellipticity effects on diffusive magnon spin and heat transport in easy-plane ferromagnets

Nicolas Vidal-Silva , Alejandro O. Leon This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 03:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords magnonstransportellipticityferromagnetsspin conductivitythermal conductivityanisotropyBoltzmann equation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ellipticity of magnons leads to enhanced heat transport and axis-dependent spin transport in easy-plane ferromagnets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper explores the role of elliptical magnon trajectories in diffusive transport within easy-plane ferromagnets. The authors begin by obtaining the magnon dispersion and spin from the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation that includes a perpendicular anisotropy term. They then use the Boltzmann transport equation under the relaxation time approximation to derive the spin and thermal conductivities. The calculations reveal that ellipticity modifies spin transport differently for easy versus hard perpendicular axes, increasing it in one case and decreasing it in the other, while heat transport sees an increase for both axis types in two- and three-dimensional setups. This distinction is relevant for applications in spin caloritronics where magnons carry both spin and heat.

Core claim

The central discovery is that magnon ellipticity, induced by perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in easy-plane ferromagnets, alters the diffusive transport properties. Using a perturbative solution of the Boltzmann equation, the spin conductivity is shown to increase for easy-axis and decrease for hard-axis configurations, while the thermal conductivity increases in both cases for 3D and 2D systems.

What carries the argument

The magnon dispersion relation obtained from the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation with anisotropy, which determines the elliptical character and is inserted into the expressions for transport coefficients.

Load-bearing premise

The Boltzmann transport equation is solved assuming small deviations from equilibrium and using a single isotropic relaxation time for all magnons.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the magnon thermal conductivity in an easy-plane ferromagnet sample before and after inducing a perpendicular anisotropy, to check for the predicted increase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19998 by Alejandro O. Leon, Nicolas Vidal-Silva.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of a macrospin trajectory with (thicker black curve) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Magnon dispersion relation (a) and magnon spin (b) as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

When a magnetic material hosts spin-wave excitations, or magnons, the local magnetization can rotate in circular or elliptical orbits, the latter arising naturally in the presence of magnetic anisotropies transverse to the equilibrium magnetization. This article investigates the diffusive transport of elliptical magnons in easy-plane ferromagnets. Our analysis starts with the derivation of the magnon dispersion relation and magnon spin from the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation with a perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. Then, using the Boltzmann transport equation in the relaxation time approximation and perturbation analysis, the magnon-spin and magnon thermal conductivities are obtained, quantifying the magnon transport in the insulator. Our calculations demonstrate that, in both three- and two-dimensional systems, the effects of ellipticity on magnon transport coefficients result in an enhancement or a decrease, depending on whether magnets with a easy or hard perpendicular-to-plane axis are considered, respectively. On the other hand, our results predict an enhancement of the magnon heat transport for both easy- and hard-axis magnetic systems. Our study supports previous works on magnon ellipticity and makes a step towards clarifying its effect on magnon transport properties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates ellipticity effects on diffusive magnon spin and heat transport in easy-plane ferromagnets. Starting from the LLG equation with perpendicular anisotropy, the authors derive the magnon dispersion relation and magnon spin for elliptical orbits. They then employ the Boltzmann transport equation in the relaxation time approximation with perturbation analysis to obtain expressions for the magnon spin and thermal conductivities in 2D and 3D systems. The key findings are that ellipticity causes enhancement or decrease in spin transport coefficients depending on easy or hard perpendicular axis, respectively, while heat transport is enhanced for both types of systems.

Significance. Should the central results prove robust, this study offers valuable insights into how magnon ellipticity influences transport properties, building on prior research in magnonics. The explicit calculations for both spin and heat conductivities in different dimensions provide a basis for understanding anisotropic effects in magnetic insulators, with potential applications in spin caloritronics.

major comments (1)
  1. [Boltzmann transport section] The derivation of transport coefficients relies on the relaxation-time approximation with a single, isotropic and wavevector-independent relaxation time. As the elliptical magnon modes arise from the anisotropy, this is likely to make the scattering rates (and thus tau) momentum-dependent, particularly for magnon-phonon or magnon-magnon scattering. This could change the quantitative corrections and possibly the qualitative enhancement/decrease behavior for the spin conductivity. The paper should either justify the constant-tau choice or provide an estimate of the error introduced by this approximation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'easy or hard perpendicular-to-plane axis' but the title specifies 'easy-plane ferromagnets'; a brief clarification on the distinction between easy-plane and the perpendicular anisotropy would help.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments provided. We have addressed the major comment in detail below and made revisions to the manuscript to incorporate the referee's suggestions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The derivation of transport coefficients relies on the relaxation-time approximation with a single, isotropic and wavevector-independent relaxation time. As the elliptical magnon modes arise from the anisotropy, this is likely to make the scattering rates (and thus tau) momentum-dependent, particularly for magnon-phonon or magnon-magnon scattering. This could change the quantitative corrections and possibly the qualitative enhancement/decrease behavior for the spin conductivity. The paper should either justify the constant-tau choice or provide an estimate of the error introduced by this approximation.

    Authors: We agree that the assumption of a constant, wavevector-independent relaxation time is an approximation that warrants further discussion, particularly given the anisotropy introduced by ellipticity. In the original manuscript, this choice was made to focus on the intrinsic effects of the elliptical magnon orbits on the transport coefficients through modifications to the dispersion, velocity, and spin density. This is a standard approach in the literature on magnon transport in anisotropic systems to separate band effects from scattering details. To address the referee's concern, we will revise the manuscript to include a dedicated paragraph in the Boltzmann transport section. There, we will justify the constant-τ approximation by arguing that the ellipticity primarily affects the magnon group velocities and the spin carried by each mode, leading to the reported enhancement or reduction in conductivities. For scattering processes like magnon-phonon interactions, while momentum dependence exists, the qualitative behavior for small anisotropy parameters (as considered in our perturbation analysis) remains dominated by the changes in the density of states and velocities rather than scattering anisotropy. We note that a full microscopic treatment of k-dependent τ would require specifying the dominant scattering mechanism and is left for future studies. However, we believe the trends we report are robust under this approximation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained; no reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper derives the magnon dispersion and spin polarization from the LLG equation including perpendicular anisotropy, yielding elliptical orbits that modify group velocity and density of states. It then inserts these into the Boltzmann transport equation solved in the relaxation-time approximation under a perturbative expansion around local equilibrium, using an explicitly stated single isotropic relaxation time. The resulting spin and thermal conductivities are computed integrals over the modified dispersion; the reported enhancement or suppression due to ellipticity therefore follows directly from the altered velocities and DOS rather than from any fitted parameter or self-referential definition. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation are present in the provided text. The constant-tau assumption is a standard modeling choice whose validity is a separate question of approximation quality, not a circularity in the derivation chain itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation with an added perpendicular anisotropy term and on the relaxation-time approximation inside the Boltzmann equation; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • magnon relaxation time
    Appears as an input in the relaxation-time approximation of the Boltzmann transport equation.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Magnetization dynamics are governed by the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation.
    Invoked at the start of the analysis to obtain the magnon dispersion.
  • domain assumption Diffusive transport can be described by the Boltzmann equation in the relaxation-time approximation.
    Used to compute conductivities from the derived dispersion and spin.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5739 in / 1499 out tokens · 51224 ms · 2026-05-20T03:46:12.618007+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz,On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies,Phys. Z. Sowjetunion8,153 (1935)

    work page 1935

  2. [2]

    DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08-044316-4.X0001-1

    Mayergoyz I D, Bertotti G, Serpico C.Nonlinear Mag- netization Dynamics in Nanosystems(Elsevier, Oxford, 2009). DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08-044316-4.X0001-1

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-044316-4.x0001-1 2009

  3. [3]

    D. C. Ralph and M. D. Stiles,Spin transfer torques,J. Magn. Magn. Mater.320, 1190 (2008). DOI:10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.12.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.12.019 2008

  4. [4]

    Slonczewski,Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers,J

    J.C. Slonczewski,Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers,J. Magn. Magn. Mater.159, L1 (1996). DOI:10.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5 1996

  5. [5]

    Berger,Emission of spin waves by a magnetic mul- tilayer traversed by a current,Phys

    L. Berger,Emission of spin waves by a magnetic mul- tilayer traversed by a current,Phys. Rev. B54, 9353 (1996). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.54.9353

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.9353 1996

  6. [6]

    Q. Shao, P. Li, L. Liu, H. Yang, S. Fukami, A. Razavi, H. Wu, K. Wang, F. Freimuth, Y . Mokrousov, M. D. Stiles, S. Emori, A. Hoffmann, J. Åkerman, K. Roy, J.-P. Wang, S.-H. Yang, K. Garello, and W. Zhang,Roadmap of Spin- Orbit Torques,IEEE Trans. Magn.57, 1 (2021). DOI:10.1109/TMAG.2021.3078583

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2021.3078583 2021

  7. [7]

    G. E. W. Bauer, E. Saitoh, and B. J. van Wees,Spin caloritronics,Nat. Mater.11, 391 (2012). DOI:10.1038/nmat3301

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat3301 2012

  8. [8]

    Bose and A

    A. Bose and A. A. Tulapurkar,Recent advances in the spin Nernst effect, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials,J. Magn. Magn. Mater.491, 165526 (2019). DOI:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165526

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165526 2019

  9. [9]

    Uchida,Transport phenomena in spin caloritronics, Proc

    K-I. Uchida,Transport phenomena in spin caloritronics, Proc. Japan Acad., Ser. B97, 69 (2021). DOI:10.2183/pjab.97.004

    work page doi:10.2183/pjab.97.004 2021

  10. [10]

    Uchida, T

    K-I. Uchida, T. An, Y . Kajiwara, M. Toda, and E. Saitoh,Surface-acoustic-wave-driven spin pumping in Y3Fe5O12/Pt hybrid structure,Appl. Phys. Lett.99, 212501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3662032

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3662032 2011

  11. [11]

    Dreher, M

    L. Dreher, M. Weiler, M. Pernpeintner, H. Huebl, R. Gross, M. S. Brandt, and S. T. B. Goennenwein,Sur- face acoustic wave driven ferromagnetic resonance in nickel thin films: Theory and experiment,Phys. Rev. B 86, 134415(2012). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.134415

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.134415 2012

  12. [12]

    J. Zhu, J. A. Katine, G. E. Rowlands, Y . J. Chen, Z. Duan, J. G. Alzate, P. Upadhyaya, J. Langer, P. K. Amiri, K. L. Wang, and I. N. Krivorotov,dcVoltage-Induced Ferromagnetic Resonance in Magnetic Tunnel Junctions, 8 Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 197203 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108. 197203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108 2012

  13. [13]

    Nozaki, T

    T. Nozaki, T. Yamamoto, S. Miwa, M. Tsujikawa, M. Shirai, S. Yuasa, and Y . Suzuki,Recent Progress in the Voltage-Controlled Magnetic Anisotropy Effect and the Challenges Faced in Developing Voltage-Torque MRAM, Micromachines10, 327 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10050327

    work page doi:10.3390/mi10050327 2019

  14. [14]

    S. I. Kiselev, J. C. Sankey, I. N. Krivorotov, N. C. Emley, R. J. Schoelkopf, R. A. Buhrman, and D. C. Ralph,Mi- crowave oscillations of a nanomagnet driven by a spin- polarized current,Nature425, 380 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01967

    work page doi:10.1038/nature01967 2003

  15. [15]

    Slavin and V

    A. Slavin and V . Tiberkevich,Nonlinear auto-oscillator theory of microwave generation by spin-polarized current, IEEE Trans. Magn.45, 1875 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2008.2009935

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2008.2009935 2009

  16. [16]

    Berkov and N

    D. Berkov and N. Gorn,Transition from the macrospin to chaotic behavior by a spin-torque driven magnetiza- tion precession of a square nanoelement,Phys. Rev. B71, 052403 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.052403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.052403 2005

  17. [17]

    A. M. Cabanas, M. G. Clerc, D. Laroze, and A. O. Leon, Chaotic patterns and localized states in spin valves, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.476, 589 (2019). DOI:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.01.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.01.027 2019

  18. [18]

    Tatara, H

    G. Tatara, H. Kohno, and J. Shibata,Microscopic ap- proach to current-driven domain wall dynamics,Phys. Rep.468, 213 (2008). DOI:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.07.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.07.003 2008

  19. [19]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren and V . Cros,Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications,Nat. Rev. Mater.2, 17031 (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats. 2017.31

    work page doi:10.1038/natrevmats 2017

  20. [20]

    Brataas, B

    A. Brataas, B. van Wees, O. Klein, G. de Loubens, and M. Viret,Spin insulatronics,Phys. Rep.885, 1 (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020. 08.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020 2020

  21. [21]

    A. J. Princep, R. A. Ewings, S. Ward, S. Tóth, C. Dubs, D. Prabhakaran, and A. T. Boothroyd,The full magnon spectrum of yttrium iron garnetnpj Quantum Materials2, 63 (2017). DOI:10.1038/s41535-017-0067-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-017-0067-y 2017

  22. [22]

    Nambu, J

    Y . Nambu, J. Barker, Y . Okino, T. Kikkawa, Y . Shiomi, M. Enderle, T. Weber, B. Winn, M. Graves-Brook, J. M. Tran- quada, T. Ziman, M. Fujita, G. E. W. Bauer, E. Saitoh, and K. Kakurai,Observation of Magnon Polarization,Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 027201 (2020). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.027201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.027201 2020

  23. [23]

    D. S. Maior, E. C. Souza, and S. M. Rezende,Magnon energy renormalization in yttrium iron garnet, Phys. Rev. B108, 054406 (2023). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.054406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.054406 2023

  24. [24]

    Bai, H-A

    H. Bai, H-A. Zhou, W. Li, T. Xu, L. Wang, P. Gargiani, M. Valvidares, and W. Jiang,4f electron−mediated com- pensated magnetism in rare-earth-substituted iron garnet films with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, Phys. Rev. Applied23, 044062 (2025). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.044062

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.23.044062 2025

  25. [25]

    P. G. Li, S. M. Ng, X. Yuan, F. X. Zhang, H. F. Wong, Z. Chu, P. Cao, C. W. Leung,Spin magnetotransport in rare- earth iron garnet (REIG)/Pt: Effects of modulated bulk and REIG/Pt interfaces, APL Mater.12, 081114 (2024). DOI:10.1063/5.0215071

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0215071 2024

  26. [26]

    V . V . Kruglyak, S. O. Demokritov, and D. Grundler, Magnonics,J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.43, 264001 (2010). DOI:10.1088/0022-3727/43/26/264001

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/43/26/264001 2010

  27. [27]

    A. V . Chumak, V . I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hille- brands,Magnon spintronics,Nat. Phys.11, 453 (2015). DOI:10.1038/nphys3347

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3347 2015

  28. [28]

    Barman, G

    B. Flebus, D. Grundler, B. Rana, Y . Otani, I. Barsukov, A. Barman, G. Gubbiotti, P. Landeros, J. Akerman, U. Ebels, P. Pirro, V . E. Demidov, K. Schultheiss, G. Csaba, Q. Wang, F. Ciubotaru, D. E. Nikonov, P. Che, R. Hertel, T. Ono, D. Afanasiev, J. Mentink, T. Rasing, B. Hillebrands, S. V . Kusminskiy, W. Zhang, C. R. Du, A. Finco, T. van der Sar, Y . K...

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ 2024

  29. [29]

    S. A. Bender and Y . Tserkovnyak,Interfacial spin and heat transfer between metals and magnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. B91, 140402(R) (2015). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.140402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.140402 2015

  30. [30]

    Ulloa, A

    C. Ulloa, A. Tomadin, J. Shan, M. Polini, B. J. van Wees, and R. A. Duine,Nonlocal Spin Transport as a Probe of Viscous Magnon Fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 117203 (2019). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.117203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.117203 2019

  31. [31]

    Zheng, S

    J. Zheng, S. Bender, J. Armaitis, R. E. Troncoso, and R. A. Duine,Green’s function formalism for spin transport in metal-insulator-metal heterostructures,Phys. Rev. B96, 174422 (2017). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.174422

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.174422 2017

  32. [32]

    Gao, C-H

    J. Gao, C-H. Lambert, R. Schlitz, M. Fiebig, P. Gam- bardella, and Saül Vélez,Magnon transport and ther- moelectric effects in ultrathin Tm3Fe5O12/Pt nonlocal de- vices,Phys. Rev. Research4, 043214 (2022). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043214 9

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.043214 2022

  33. [33]

    L. J. Cornelissen, K. J. H. Peters, G. E. W. Bauer, R. A. Duine, and B. J. van Wees,Magnon spin transport driven by the magnon chemical potential in a magnetic insulator, Phys. Rev. B94, 014412 (2016). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.014412

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.014412 2016

  34. [34]

    Alves Santos and B

    O. Alves Santos and B. J. van Wees,Magnon Confinement in an All-on-Chip YIG Cavity Resonator Using Hybrid YIG/Py Magnon Barriers, Nano Lett.23, 9303 (2023). DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02388

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02388 2023

  35. [35]

    T. Yu, C. Cai, G. E. W. Bauer,Chirality enables thermal magnon transistors, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67, 247511 (2024). DOI:10.1007/s11433-023-2294-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-023-2294-1 2024

  36. [36]

    D. K. de Wal, R. L. Mena, M. Zohaib, and B. J. van Wees, Gate control of magnon spin transport in unconventional magnon transistors based on the van der Waals antiferro- magnet CrPS4, Phys. Rev. B110, 224434 (2024). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.224434

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.224434 2024

  37. [37]

    X.-Y . Wei, O. Alves Santos, C. H. Sumba Lusero, G. E. W. Bauer, J. Ben Youssef, and B. J. van Wees,Giant magnon spin conductivity in ultrathin yttrium iron garnet films, Nat. Mater.21, 1352 (2022). DOI:10.1038/s41563-022-01369-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-022-01369-0 2022

  38. [38]

    G. E. W. Bauer, P. Tang, M. Elyasi, Y . M. Blanter, and B. J. van Wees,Soft magnons in anisotropic ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B108, 064431 (2023). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.064431

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.064431 2023

  39. [39]

    Wimmer, M

    T. Wimmer, M. Althammer, L. Liensberger, N. Vliet- stra, S. Geprägs, M. Weiler, R. Gross, and H. Huebl, Spin Transport in a Magnetic Insulator with Zero Effec- tive Damping,Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 257201 (2019). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.257201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.257201 2019

  40. [40]

    Gückelhorn, T

    J. Gückelhorn, T. Wimmer, M. Müller, S. Geprägs, H. Huebl, R. Gross, and M. Althammer,Magnon transport in Y3Fe5O12/Pt nanostructures with reduced effective magne- tization,Phys. Rev. B104, L180410 (2021). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.L180410

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.l180410 2021

  41. [41]

    Y . Yin, Y . Liu, Y . Liu, and X. Wan,Influence of magnon renormalization and interband coupling on the spin See- beck effect in YIG, Phys. Rev. B110, 144413 (2024). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.144413

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.144413 2024

  42. [42]

    Liu, X-Y

    J. Liu, X-Y . Wei, G. E. W. Bauer, J. Ben Youssef, and B. J. van Wees,Electrically induced strong modulation of magnon transport in ultrathin magnetic insulator films, Phys. Rev. B103, 214425 (2021). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.214425

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.214425 2021

  43. [43]

    Taghinejad, K

    H. Taghinejad, K. Yamakawa, X. Huang, Y . Lyu, L. P. Cairns, S. Husain, R. Ramesh, and J. G. Analytis,Low- Field Regime of Magnon Transport in PLD-Grown YIG Films, Nano Lett.25, 6438 (2025). DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c06592

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c06592 2025

  44. [44]

    M. A. Myhre, V . Brehm, T. Delvaux, A. Brataas, and A. Qaiumzadeh,Thickness-dependent magnon spin transport in antiferromagnetic insulators: Crossover from quasi-three-dimensional to quasi-two-dimensional regimes, arXiv:2509.03941 DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2509.03941

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.03941

  45. [45]

    W. P. Sterk, H. Y . Yuan, A. Rückriegel, B. Z. Rameshti, and R. A. Duine,Green’s function formalism for nonlo- cal elliptical magnon transport, Phys. Rev. B104, 174404 (2021). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.174404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.174404 2021

  46. [46]

    Zheng, A

    J. Zheng, A. Rückriegel, S. A. Bender, and R. A. Duine, Ellipticity and dissipation effects in magnon spin valves, Phys. Rev. B 101, 094402 (2020). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.094402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.094402 2020

  47. [47]

    A. O. Leon and M. G. Clerc, Spin-transfer-driven nano- oscillators are equivalent to parametric resonators, Phys. Rev. B91, 014411 (2015). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.014411

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.014411 2015

  48. [48]

    H. J. Mikeska,Solitons in a one-dimensional magnet with an easy plane,J. Phys. C11, L29 (1978). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/11/1/ 007

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3719/11/1/ 1978

  49. [49]

    I. V . Barashenkov and E. V . Zemlyanaya,Stable Com- plexes of Parametrically Driven, Damped Nonlinear Schrödinger Solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2568 (1999). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2568

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.2568 1999

  50. [50]

    M. G. Clerc, S. Coulibaly, D. Laroze, A. O. Leon, and A. S. Núñez,Alternating spin-polarized current induces parametric resonance in spin valves, Phys. Rev. B91, 224426 (2015). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.224426 [51]Dissipative magnetic breathers induced by time- modulated voltages, A. O. Leon, M. G. Clerc, and D. Altbir, Phys. Rev. E98, 062213 (2018). DOI:10...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.224426 2015

  51. [51]

    Streib, N

    S. Streib, N. Vidal-Silva, K. Shen, and G. E. W. Bauer,Magnon-phonon interactions in magnetic insula- tors,Phys. Rev. B99, 184442 (2019). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.184442

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.184442 2019

  52. [52]

    Rückriegel, P

    A. Rückriegel, P. Kopietz, D. A. Bozhko, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands,Magnetoelastic modes and lifetime of magnons in thin yttrium iron garnet films,Phys. Rev. B 89, 184413 (2014). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.89.184413

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.184413 2014

  53. [53]

    Barker, and G

    J. Barker, and G. E. W. BauerThermal Spin Dynamics of Yttrium Iron GarnetPhys. Rev. Lett.117, 217201 (2016). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.217201 10

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.217201 2016

  54. [54]

    H. Urra, J. F. Marín, M. Páez-Silva, M. Taki, S. Coulibaly, L. Gordillo, and M. A. García-Ñustes,Localized Fara- day patterns under heterogeneous parametric excitation, Phys. Rev. E99, 033115 (2019). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.99.033115

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.99.033115 2019

  55. [55]

    N. V . Alexeeva, I. V . Barashenkov, and G. P. Tsironis, Impurity-Induced Stabilization of Solitons in Arrays of Parametrically Driven Nonlinear Oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3053 (2000). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3053

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.3053 2000

  56. [56]

    De Lucia, P

    F. De Lucia, P. Parra-Rivas, C. Mas Arabí, P-J. Sazio, S- P. Gorza, and F. Leo,Parametrically driven Kerr cavity solitons, N. Englebert, Nat. Photonics15, 857 (2021). DOI:10.1038/s41566-021-00858-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-021-00858-z 2021

  57. [57]

    I. V . Barashenkov, M. M. Bogdan and V . I. Korobov,Sta- bility Diagram of the Phase-Locked Solitons in the Para- metrically Driven, Damped Nonlinear Schrödinger Equa- tion, EPL15, 113 (1991). DOI:10.1209/0295-5075/15/2/001 11

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/15/2/001 1991