Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

K3 surfaces from configurations of six lines in $\mathbb{P}^{2}$ and mirror symmetry II --- $\lambda_{K3}$-functions ---

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.09373 v1 pith:U7TA4Y2I submitted 2019-03-22 math.AG

classification math.AG
keywords mirrorsurfacesfunctionslambdacoverdoublemapsmoduli
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We continue our study on the hypergeometric system $E(3,6)$ which describes period integrals of the double cover family of K3 surfaces. Near certain special boundary points in the moduli space of the K3 surfaces, we construct the local solutions and determine the so-called mirror maps expressing them in terms of genus two theta functions. These mirror maps are the K3 analogues of the elliptic $\lambda$-function. We find that there are two non-isomorphic definitions of the lambda functions corresponding to a flip in the moduli space. We also discuss mirror symmetry for the double cover K3 surfaces and their higher dimensional generalizations. A follow up paper will describe more details of the latter.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Non-commutative resolutions and pre-quotients of Calabi-Yau double covers

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A-periods of non-commutative resolutions of Calabi-Yau double covers satisfy the same GKZ system as those of an explicitly constructed smooth complete intersection.

  2. Restriction theorems: from orbits and Chevalley to periods and Galois

    math.AG 2026-02 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Galois-theoretic parametrization of restriction subvarieties is claimed, together with Calabi-Yau period formulas in terms of invariants; key steps are invalid as stated.

Pith tools