Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

All-order alpha'-expansion of one-loop open-string integrals

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A KZB-type differential equation reduces one-loop open-string integrals to iterated Eisenstein integrals, with tree-level cusp values as the seed data.

desk verdict Elegant and probably right: a KZB-type differential equation yields a compact all-order alpha-prime expansion for one-loop open-string integrals, but the key equation is asserted, not proved, in the letter. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09848 v2 pith:UCA4FYCX submitted 2019-08-26 hep-th math.NT

Carlos R. Mafra , Oliver Schlotterer This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath.NT MSC 11G5511F6781T30 PACS 11.25.-w
keywords open-stringamplitudesellipticmultiplezetavaluesiteratedEisensteinintegralsKnizhnik-Zamolodchikov-Bernardequationalpha-primeexpansiongenus-onediskKronecker-Eisensteinseries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

One-loop open-string amplitudes live on a cylinder or Möbius strip, and their low-energy expansion in the inverse string tension $\alpha'$ had previously been computed by direct integration over world-sheet punctures, order by order. This paper claims that a generating function of all such integrals obeys a simple Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov–Bernard-type differential equation in the torus modulus, and that Picard iteration solves it in a uniform way: every order of the $\alpha'$-expansion is a finite combination of iterated Eisenstein integrals acting on genus-zero (tree-level) initial data. If the claim is right, the elliptic multiple zeta values that appear in these amplitudes come out automatically in their minimal form, and the expansion is governed by the same kind of first-order differential-equation structure that underlies modern Feynman-integral computations. The payoff is a uniform, all-multiplicity description of one-loop open-string expansions.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the generating function $Z^\tau_{\vec{\eta}}$ of equation (6), built from the Kronecker–Eisenstein series and the Koba–Nielsen factor, together with its universal differential equation (8): $2\pi i\,\partial_\tau Z^\tau_{\vec{\eta}}(A|1,B)=\sum_C D^\tau_{\vec{\eta}}(B|C)\,Z^\tau_{\vec{\eta}}(A|1,C)$. The matrix $D^\tau_{\vec{\eta}}$ is linear in the Mandelstam invariants $s_{ij}$ and therefore in $\alpha'$, and its entire $\tau$-dependence is carried by Weierstrass $\wp$-functions, giving the decomposition $D^\tau_{\vec{\eta}}=\sum_k(1-k)G_k(\tau)\,r_{\vec{\eta}}(\epsilon_k)$. Picard iteration of this first-order equation produces the iterated Eisenstein integrals $\gamma(k_1,\dots,k_r|\tau)$; the initial values at the cusp $\tau\to i\infty$ are fixed by known disk integrals. The action of the matrices $r_{\vec{\eta}}(\epsilon_k)$ is what arranges the expansion so that elliptic multiple zeta values appear in minimal form.

What would settle it

Compare the planar four-point A-cycle integral at the first non-leading order in $\alpha'$ computed by direct puncture integration with the value produced by equation (14); a mismatch, or a nonzero boundary term $\int dv_j\,\partial_{v_j}(\cdots)$ in the derivation of (8) at four points, would falsify the universal differential equation and the expansion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is equation (14), an explicit all-order formula for the A-cycle integrals $Z^\tau_{\vec{\eta}}(A|1,B)$ that generate one-loop open-string amplitudes: $$Z^\tau_{\vec{\eta}}(A|1,B)=\sum_{r\ge0}\ \sum_{k_1,\dots,k_r\in\{0,4,6,\dots\}} \gamma(k_1,\dots,k_r|\tau)\prod_{j=1}^r(k_j-1)\sum_{C\in S_{n-1}} r_{\vec{\eta}}(\epsilon_{k_r}\cdots\epsilon_{k_1})_{BC}\,$Z^{{i\infty}}$_{\vec{\eta}}(A|1,C).$$ Here $\gamma(k_1,\dots,k_r|\tau)$ are iterated Eisenstein integrals with tangential-base-point regularization, $r_{\vec{\eta}}(\epsilon_k)$ are $\tau$-independent matrix differential operators in the variables $\eta_j$, and $Z^{i\infty}_{\vec{\eta}}$ are the cusp values obtained by degenerating the cylinder to genus-zero disk integrals. The same formula covers planar, non-planar and Möbius-strip configurations, and the indices $k_j$ run only over $0,4,6,8,\dots$ because odd and weight-two Eisenstein series drop out of the Weierstrass decomposition of the differential operator. The authors put this forward as the exact $\alpha'$-expansion, not an approximation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the universal differential equation (8) holds at all multiplicities, which is verified only at two and three points and requires all cylinder integration-by-parts boundary terms to vanish, together with the unproven assumption that the matrices $r_{\vec{\eta}}(\epsilon_k)$ preserve Tsunogai's commutation relations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every order of the $\alpha'$-expansion of massless one-loop open-string amplitudes is obtained by evaluating finite products of the matrices $r_{\vec{\eta}}(\epsilon_k)$ on tree-level initial data, so no new puncture integration is needed at higher orders.
  • The elliptic multiple zeta values in the coefficients are produced in minimal form, with their rational relations built in through the commutation relations of Tsunogai's derivations.
  • Planar and non-planar A-cycle integrals, and therefore cylinder and Möbius-strip amplitudes, are governed by the same differential operator, so the same generating functions control the cancellation of tadpole divergences.
  • Because the differential equation is linear in $\alpha'$, the method gives a genus-one counterpart of the $\varepsilon$-form of Feynman-integral differential equations, sharpening the analogy between $\alpha'$ and the dimensional-regularization parameter $\varepsilon$.
  • The initial conditions are genus-zero disk integrals, so the one-loop expansion inherits whatever structure is known at tree level, including multiple zeta values from disk integrals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is to push the four- and five-point cases to higher weight: if the matrices $r_{\vec{\eta}}(\epsilon_k)$ obey Tsunogai's relations, the identities among iterated Eisenstein integrals should exactly match the known elliptic-multiple-zeta-value relations, which would effectively prove the representation conjecture.
  • Because the setup is formulated at the level of generating functions, the same differential-equation logic could be adapted to closed-string one-loop integrals, where the $\tau$-expansion would encode modular graph forms rather than elliptic multiple zeta values.
  • One could implement equation (14) as a purely algebraic algorithm: precompute the finite set of matrices $r_{\vec{\eta}}(\epsilon_k)$ once for a given $n$, and then each $\alpha'$-order coefficient is a matrix product times weighted sums of iterated Eisenstein integrals, making very high orders accessible numerically.
  • The method suggests a strategy for higher genus: use separating and non-separating degenerations of the world-sheet as initial conditions for differential equations in the complex-structure moduli, though the paper only states this as a direction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new method for the all-order α'-expansion of one-loop open-string integrals. It introduces generating functions Z^τ_η for A-cycle integrals on the cylinder and claims that they satisfy a KZB-type differential equation (8). Solving (8) by Picard iteration, the paper expresses Z^τ_η as a sum of iterated Eisenstein integrals γ(k_1,...,k_r|τ) multiplied by matrices r_η(ε_k) acting on cusp initial values Z^{i∞}_η, which in turn are reduced to genus-zero disk integrals. The authors work out the differential operators and cusp initial values explicitly for n=2 and n=3, and argue that the structure matches Tsunogai's derivations and elliptic multiple zeta values in minimal form. The main result is equation (14), with the all-multiplicity derivation of the underlying differential equation deferred to the companion paper [12].

Significance. If the central differential equation (8) and the cusp reduction hold, the paper provides a conceptually new and potentially powerful method: the α'-expansion of one-loop open-string integrals is organized by iterated Eisenstein integrals with genus-zero initial data, connecting directly with the elliptic KZB associator and Tsunogai's derivations. The explicit n=2 and n=3 examples are concrete and checkable, and the letter is clearly written. The main strengths are the elegance of the proposed structure and the explicit verifications that support it. However, the letter's central claims rest on a small number of unproved or only partially verified ingredients, so the significance is conditional on those ingredients being established in the companion paper.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2B, Eq. (8)] The universal differential equation (8) is the sole foundation for the Picard solution (10) and the main expansion (14), yet its derivation is not supplied in this letter. The text states that (8) follows from (5), (9) and "the vanishing of boundary terms ∫ dv_j ∂v_j(...)", and the only checks shown are the n=2 and n=3 cases of Section 2. For n≥4 the τ-derivatives mix permutations and, for non-planar cycles, the punctures at z_j = τ/2+v_j carry explicit τ-dependence; if any boundary contribution survives, equation (8) would acquire extra terms and the factorized form (14) would not hold. I ask the authors to either include a proof or a detailed outline of the boundary-term cancellation at generic multiplicity, or a nontrivial n=4 example with planar and non-planar cycles, or to state explicitly in the letter that (8) is a theorem proved in [12] and state its precise hypotheses. As written, the central claim depends on an unstated assumption.
  2. [§2C, paragraph after Eq. (14)] The statement that the coefficients in (14) are elliptic multiple zeta values in minimal form rests on the assertion that r_η(ε_k) "should preserve the commutation relations of Tsunogai's derivations" and the immediately following sentence that they "are believed to furnish matrix representations". This is a conjecture, not a proven property. The n=3 representation (22) checks some relations, but no all-multiplicity proof is given. Because the abstract and conclusions present the minimal eMZV statement as a result, the authors should either prove the representation property or explicitly mark it as a conjecture and adjust the claims about minimality accordingly.
  3. [§3A, Eqs. (28) and (31)-(37)] The reduction of cusp initial values to disk integrals is another essential input of (14), but the general n-point statement is deferred to [12]; equations (31)–(37) give only n=2,3 and rely on contour-deformation factors such as the "2i sin(πs12/2)" in (31), whose derivation is also deferred. Since these cusp values are the seed data for the Picard iteration, the same completeness concern applies as for (8). Please provide the general degeneration formula or a precise pointer to the statement in [12], and ideally one higher-n example so the reader can verify the form of the kinematic limits (28).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (14)] The notation r_η(ε_{kr}...ε_{k1})_{B C} is not fully defined: please clarify that the subscript denotes the matrix element with row and column labelled by the permutations B and C, and specify the ordering convention for the matrix product.
  2. [Eq. (6) and Fig. 2] The non-planar A-cycle domain is only described in words; please spell out the substitution z_j = τ/2 + v_j with v_j ∈ (0,1) and the ordering of the v_j for a generic non-planar permutation, so that the integrals in (6) are unambiguous.
  3. [Eq. (21)] The notation for the permutation map in (21), "s12↔s13, η2↔η3", is clear in context but the arrow notation is nonstandard; consider writing the full map of Mandelstam variables and η's explicitly.
  4. [§3B, Eq. (31)] The appearance of the factor 2i sin(πs12/2) is stated to stem from contour deformations detailed in [12]; a one-line explanation or an equation reference inside [12] would help the reader follow the derivation on the page.
  5. [§2B, Eq. (12)] The convention G_0 = -1 is introduced in the text, but it may be worth noting explicitly that this is a normalization of the Weierstrass expansion and not a standard Riemann zeta value, to avoid confusion with G_2 and G_4.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The all-order claim rests on a differential equation whose proof is deferred to the authors' companion paper, but no fitted-input or definitional circularity is present.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 'The differential equation', sentence introducing Eq. (8); repeated in 'Examples for differential operators'.]
    "As will be derived in [12], the τ -derivatives of (6) can be written as [Eq. (8)] ... All-multiplicity expressions as well as detailed derivations of the differential equations can be found in [12] (see e.g. section 4.2 in the reference for the four-point case)."

    Equation (8) is the input to the Picard iteration (10) and hence to the main result (14). The letter does not prove (8) at all multiplicities; it states that the derivation is in [12], whose authors are the same. Only the n=2 and n=3 cases (Eqs. (16) and (19)) are verified in the letter. Thus the all-order central claim is supported by a self-citation rather than by a proof contained in the present text. This is not a definitional or fitted-input circularity: the cusp initial values are reduced to known disk integrals and the two/three-point checks provide independent content, so the chain would be complete if [12] supplies the promised derivation.

full rationale

The derivation chain (6) -> (8) -> (10) -> (14) is a mathematical consequence once the differential equation and the expansion (12) are granted; no parameter is fitted to the final coefficients, and the initial values are obtained from genuinely lower-genus disk integrals rather than from the genus-one quantities being predicted. The only circularity-adjacent feature is that the all-order differential equation (8) is asserted on the authority of the companion paper [12] by the same authors, with only n=2,3 examples shown here. This is a load-bearing self-citation but not an equation-level reduction by construction; if [12] contains the derivation it claims, the paper's chain is complete. Accordingly the score is 4 rather than 0, and no step merits a higher severity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted constants. It relies on standard mathematical identities and on two assumptions that are not fully proven in the letter: the universal form of the differential operator with vanishing boundary terms, and the Tsunogai representation of the matrices r_eta.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Fay identity for the Kronecker-Eisenstein series (7)
    Used to reduce the integrand to a basis of (n-1)! permutations; standard identity from theta-function theory.
  • standard math The mixed heat equation (9) for the Kronecker-Eisenstein series
    Used in deriving the tau-derivative equation (8); standard property of the Kronecker-Eisenstein series.
  • domain assumption Green function differential equations (5)
    Define the Green function on the torus and its derivatives; standard in string theory worldsheet computations.
  • ad hoc to paper Vanishing of boundary terms in integration by parts over the cylinder domain
    Required to obtain the universal differential equation (8); the paper defers the derivation to [12] and only verifies n=2,3.
  • ad hoc to paper The r_eta(epsilon_k) matrices preserve the commutation relations of Tsunogai's derivations
    Needed for the claim that the alpha-prime coefficients are eMZVs in minimal form; the paper says this is 'believed' rather than proven.
  • domain assumption Tangential-base-point regularization of iterated Eisenstein integrals
    Used to define the integrals gamma(k_1,...,k_r|tau) in (13); standard in Brown's work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of All-order alpha'-expansion of one-loop open-string integrals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UCA4FYCX

@misc{pith2026190809848,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: All-order alpha'-expansion of one-loop open-string integrals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UCA4FYCX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09848}
}
abstract

We present a new method to evaluate the $\alpha'$-expansion of genus-one integrals over open-string punctures and unravel the structure of the elliptic multiple zeta values in its coefficients. This is done by obtaining a simple differential equation of Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov-Bernard-type satisfied by generating functions of such integrals, and solving it via Picard iteration. The initial condition involves the generating functions at the cusp $\tau\to i\infty$ and can be reduced to genus-zero integrals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09848 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The cylinder parameterization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: We parameterize the torus through the lattice [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. One-loop open-string integrals from differential equations: all-order alpha'-expansions at n points

    hep-th 2019-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A-cycle integrals at genus one satisfy linear differential equations whose Picard iterations yield all-order alpha-prime expansions in iterated Eisenstein integrals, with cusp values given by disk integrals.

  2. Associators for AdS string amplitude building blocks

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Open-string AdS building blocks can be generated by Drinfeld associator recursions and closed-string ones by Deligne associator recursions, yielding all-order zeta-valued expansions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [12]

    The decomposition of eMZVs into iterated Eisenstein integrals automatically incorporates all their relations over the rational numbers [9]

    brings the differential equa- tion ( 8) of Z τ ⃗ ηinto the same form as that of the ellip- tic Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov–Bernard associator whose τ -derivative involves the derivations ǫk acting on its non- commutative arguments [10]. The decomposition of eMZVs into iterated Eisenstein integrals automatically incorporates all their relations over the rational...

    work page

  2. [1]

    is the Koba– Nielsen factor written in terms of dimensionless Man- delstam invariants sij = −2α′ki · kj and Green functions G(z, τ ) subject to the universal differential equation ∂vi G(zij, τ) = −f (1)(zij, τ) (5) 2πi∂τ G(zij, τ) = −f (2)(zij, τ) − 2ζ2 , where ∂vi is the derivative along the cylinder boundary, and ζn= ∑ ∞ k=1 1 kn with n≥2 denote Riemann ...

    work page

  3. [2]

    = n−4 and reside at the order of η−3 j of ( 6)

    relevant to n-point open-superstring amplitudes have k1+k2+ . . . = n−4 and reside at the order of η−3 j of ( 6). Moreover, ( n≥8)- point integrands additionally involve holomorphic Eisen- stein series G ℓ≥4(τ ) = −f (ℓ)(0, τ) [6] multiplying (

    work page

  4. [3]

    = n−4−ℓ as seen at the η−3−ℓ j -order of ( 6)

    at k1+k2+ . . . = n−4−ℓ as seen at the η−3−ℓ j -order of ( 6). Although the cylinder contribution to one-loop open- string amplitudes is localized at purely imaginary τ as drawn in figure 2, we will define and evaluate the in- tegrals ( 6) for generic τ in the upper half plane with Re τ ⁄= 0. In view of the parental torus, Z τ ⃗ η(1, 2, . . . , n|·) and Z τ...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Bloch and P

    S. Bloch and P. Vanhove, J. Number Theory 148 (2015) 328, [ 1309.5865]. • S. Bloch, M. Kerr and P. Vanhove, Compos. Math. 151 (2015) no.12, 2329, [ 1406.2664]. • L. Adams and S. Weinzierl, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 12 (2018) 193, [ 1704.08895]. • J. Ablinger, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, M. van Hoeij, E. Imamoglu, C. G. Raab, C. S. Radu and C. Schneider,...

    arXiv 2015

  6. [5]

    Adams and S

    L. Adams and S. Weinzierl, Phys. Lett. B781 (2018) 270, [1802.05020]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [6]

    The second entry Z τ ⃗ η(∗|A) specifies permuta- tions A = a1a2

    at n points involves n−1 factors of the Kronecker–Eisenstein series ( 4) at different arguments. The second entry Z τ ⃗ η(∗|A) specifies permuta- tions A = a1a2 . . . an ∈ Sn of the arguments, and Ω( . . .) at different zaj , ηaj are related by the Fay identity [16] Ω( z1, η1, τ)Ω( z2, η2, τ) = Ω( z1, η1+η2, τ)Ω( z2−z1, η2, τ) + Ω( z2, η1+η2, τ)Ω( z1−z2, η1,...

    work page

  8. [7]

    Broedel, N

    J. Broedel, N. Matthes, G. Richter and O. Schlotterer, J. Phys. A51 (2018) 285401, [ 1704.03449]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    ∫ τk−1 i∞ dτk × ∑ C∈Sn−1 (Dτk ⃗ η ·

    via Picard iteration – an infinite iteration of the integrated version Z τ ⃗ η(A|1, B) = Z i∞ ⃗ η (A|1, B) + ∫ τ i∞ dτ ′ 2πi ∑ C∈Sn−1 Dτ ′ ⃗ η(B|C)Z τ ′ ⃗ η(A|1, C) of (8) such that Z τ ⃗ η(A|1, B) = ∞∑ k=0 ( 1 2πi ) k ∫ τ i∞ dτ1 ∫ τ1 i∞ dτ2 . . . ∫ τk−1 i∞ dτk × ∑ C∈Sn−1 (Dτk ...

  2. [9]

    Their τ -derivatives resulting from (5), (9) and integration by parts w.r.t

    each, Z τ η2 (1, 2|1, 2) = ∫ 1 0 dv2 Ω( v12, η2, τ) es12G(v12,τ ) (15) Z τ η2 ( 2 1 |1, 2 ) = ∫ 1 0 dv2 Ω( v12+ τ 2 , η2, τ) es12G(v12+ τ 2 ,τ ) . Their τ -derivatives resulting from (5), (9) and integration by parts w.r.t. v2 take the universal form 2πi∂τ Z τ η2(∗|1, 2) = s12...

  3. [10]

    since commutators [ rη2 (ǫk1 ), rη2 (ǫk2 )] with k1, k2 ≥ 4 vanish. B. Three points give rise to A-cycle integrals Z τ η2,η3(∗|1, 2, 3) = ∫ C(∗) dz2 dz3 Ω( z12, η2+η3, τ) (18) × Ω( z23, η3, τ)es12G(z12,τ )+s13G(z13,τ )+s23G(z23,τ ) that mix under τ -derivatives (s12...p ≡ ∑ p ...

  4. [11]

    Tsunogai, Publ

    H. Tsunogai, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 31 (1995) 113

    1995

  5. [13]

    At each order in the inverse string tension α′, our main result (

    relevant to one- loop open-string amplitudes. At each order in the inverse string tension α′, our main result (

  6. [14]

    does not rely on any relation among the Mandelstam invariants. The n-point results of this work are valid for 1 2 n(n−1) independent sij, and one can still impose mo- mentum conservation when applying the α′-expansion of Z τ ⃗ ηto string amplitudes. EXAMPLES FOR DIFFERENTIAL O...

  7. [15]

    Genus-zero integrals relevant to open-string tree am- plitudes obey Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov equations with a characteristic linear factor of α′ on their right-hand side [20]

    pinpoints the ac- companying eMZVs in their minimal and canonical rep- resentation via iterated Eisenstein integrals. Genus-zero integrals relevant to open-string tree am- plitudes obey Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov equations with a characteristic linear factor of α′ on their right-h...

  8. [16]

    Modular forms, periods and scattering am- plitudes

    that appear in the double-copy representation of string tree-level amplitudes [19, 24]. Hence, the study of the genus-one integrals Z τ ⃗ η is an essential step towards universal double-copy struc- tures in one-loop amplitudes of different string theories that generalize those ...

  9. [17]

    Levin, Compositio Mathematica 106 (1997) 267

    A. Levin, Compositio Mathematica 106 (1997) 267

    1997

  10. [18]

    Brown and A

    F. Brown and A. Levin, 1110.6917

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Enriquez, Bull

    B. Enriquez, Bull. Soc. Math. France 144 (2016) 395, [1301.3042]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Broedel, C

    J. Broedel, C. R. Mafra, N. Matthes and O. Schlotterer, JHEP 07 (2015) 112, [ 1412.5535]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [21]

    C. R. Mafra and O. Schlotterer, JHEP 01 (2017) 031, [1609.07078]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Broedel and O

    J. Broedel and O. Schlotterer, in Proceedings, KMPB Conference: Elliptic Integrals, Elliptic Functions and Modular Forms in Quantum Field Theory , (2019) 133

    2019

  15. [23]

    Broedel, N

    J. Broedel, N. Matthes and O. Schlotterer, J. Phys. A49 (2016) 155203, [ 1507.02254]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Calaque, B

    D. Calaque, B. Enriquez and P. Etingof, in Algebra, arithmetic, and geometry: in honor of Yu. I. Manin. Vol. I , vol. 269 of Progr. Math. (2009) 165. • R. Hain, 1309.0580. • B. Enriquez, Selecta Math. (N.S.) 20 (2014) 491

    2009 arXiv

  17. [25]

    C. R. Mafra and O. Schlotterer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018), 011601, [ 1711.09104]. • C. R. Mafra and O. Schlotterer, JHEP 08 (2019) 090, [ 1812.10969], JHEP 08 (2019) 091, [ 1812.10970], JHEP 08 (2019) 092, [ 1812.10971]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Mafra and O

    C. Mafra and O. Schlotterer, JHEP 03 (2020) 007, [1908.10830]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    at N ≥ 5 points additionally involve MZVs ( 29) at higher depth r ≥ 2 [22]. B. Two points: Planar initial values at two points descend from four-point tree-level integrals, Z i∞ η2 (1, 2|1, 2) = π cot(πη2) 2i sin ( πs12 2 ) × ∫ 1 0 dσ2 2πiσ2 σs12/2 2 (1 − σ2)−s12 (31) = π cot(...

  20. [28]

    of ( 30) and do not appear in the non-planar counterpart of ( 31) Z i∞ η2 ( 2 1 |1, 2 ) = π sin(πη2) . (33) C. Three points: Degenerate A-cycle integrals at three points introduce five-point disk integrals, Z i∞ η2,η3 (1, a2, a3|1, 2, 3) (34) = π2 ( cot(πη23) cot(πη3) + s13 s12...

  21. [29]

    Polchinski, Cambridge University Press (2007)

    J. Polchinski, Cambridge University Press (2007)

    2007

  22. [30]

    Kronecker, Mathematische Werke IV (1881) 313

    L. Kronecker, Mathematische Werke IV (1881) 313

  23. [31]

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, Phys. Lett. 151B (1985) 21

    1985

  24. [32]

    Mumford, M

    D. Mumford, M. Nori and P. Norman, Tata Lectures on Theta I, II. No. Bd. 2. Birkh¨ auser (1983, 1984)

    1983

  25. [33]

    Pollack, Undergrad

    A. Pollack, Undergrad. thesis, Duke University (2009)

    2009

  26. [34]

    Broedel, O

    J. Broedel, O. Schlotterer and S. Stieberger, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 812, [ 1304.7267]

    2013 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Broedel, O

    J. Broedel, O. Schlotterer, S. Stieberger and T. Tera- soma, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 066014, [ 1304.7304]

    2014 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Schlotterer and S

    O. Schlotterer and S. Stieberger, J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 475401, [ 1205.1516]

    2013 arXiv

  29. [37]

    J. M. Henn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 251601, [1304.1806]

    2013 arXiv

  30. [38]

    C. R. Mafra, O. Schlotterer and S. Stieberger, Nucl. Phys. B873 (2013) 419, [ 1106.2645]. • T. Azevedo, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson and O. Schlotterer, JHEP 10 (2018) 012, [ 1803.05452]

    2013 arXiv

  31. [39]

    J. E. Gerken, A. Kleinschmidt and O. Schlotterer, JHEP 01 (2020) 064, [ 1911.03476]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    M. B. Green, J. G. Russo and P. Vanhove, JHEP 02 (2008) 020, [ 0801.0322]. • E. D’Hoker, M. B. Green, ¨O. G¨ urdogan and P. Vanhove, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 11 (2017) 165, [ 1512.06779]. • E. D’Hoker and M. B. Green, J. Number Theory 189 (2018) 25, [1603.00839]

    2008 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Zerbini, Commun

    F. Zerbini, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 10 (2016) 703, [ 1512.05689]. • J. Broedel, O. Schlotterer and F. Zerbini, JHEP 01 (2019) 155, [ 1803.00527]. • J. E. Gerken, A. Kleinschmidt and O. Schlotterer, JHEP 01 (2019) 052, [ 1811.02548]. • D. Zagier and F. Zerbini, 1906.12339

    2016 arXiv

  34. [42]

    D’Hoker, M

    E. D’Hoker, M. B. Green and B. Pioline, Commun. Math. Phys. 366 (2019) no.3, 927, [ 1712.06135]. • E. D’Hoker, M. B. Green and B. Pioline, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 13 (2019) 351, [ 1806.02691]

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.