Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 72 references

Experimental Confirmation of First-Principles Thermal Conductivity in Zirconium-Doped ThO$_2$

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Measured thermal conductivity of zirconium-doped ThO2 matches a parameter-free first-principles prediction, validating a method that could replace empirical fuel-performance correlations.

desk verdict First direct experimental check of a prior first-principles prediction of Zr-defect phonon scattering in ThO2; the 100–300 K agreement looks real, but the unstated concentration scaling and the missing error bars need to be fixed before calling it confirmation. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12329 v1 pith:UD5MQ3Z3 submitted 2024-12-16 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Ella Kartika Pek , Zilong Hua , Amey Khanolkar , J. Matthew Mann , David B. Turner , Karl Rickert , Timothy A. Prusnick , Marat Khafizov
show 2 more authors
David H. Hurley Linu Malakkal
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords thermalconductivitythoriumdioxidezirconiumdopingphonon-defectscatteringGreen'sfunctionT-matrixnon-perturbativenuclearfuelthermoreflectance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that a fully first-principles calculation can reproduce the measured drop in thermal conductivity produced by a dissolved fission product in thorium dioxide. The authors grew a single crystal of ThO2 doped with about 1.1 at% zirconium, measured its thermal conductivity from 77 to 300 K using spatial domain thermoreflectance, and compared the data with an iterative solution of the Peierls-Boltzmann transport equation in which zirconium's phonon scattering is computed non-perturbatively with the Green's function T-matrix method. The calculation and measurement agree closely from 100 to 300 K, and the authors take this as validation that the computational methodology can predict how fission products degrade nuclear fuel thermal conductivity without empirical fitting. This matters because it would allow fuel performance codes to replace fitted correction factors with mechanistic, parameter-free predictions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Green's function T-matrix method for phonon–point-defect scattering, a non-perturbative scheme that computes the full scattering rate of a phonon off a single defect by embedding the defect's perturbed interatomic force constants and relaxed geometry in the perfect-lattice Green's function, rather than treating the defect as a small perturbation. It is used together with an iterative solution of the Peierls-Boltzmann transport equation for lattice thermal conductivity, with the phonon–defect scattering rates entering alongside three-phonon anharmonic scattering from third-order force constants and Tamura isotope scattering.

What would settle it

Measure the thermal conductivity of Zr-doped ThO2 at several dopant concentrations between 0.5 and 2 at% with the same SDTR method and compare against scaling the single-defect T-matrix scattering rate linearly with concentration; disagreement in the concentration dependence would show the dilute-defect assumption is not what produces the match.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the non-perturbative Green's function T-matrix method, applied to a single zirconium substitution in a 5×5×5 supercell of ThO2, quantitatively predicts the measured temperature-dependent thermal conductivity of a 1.13 at% Zr-doped ThO2 single crystal between 100 and 300 K. The conclusion states that 'the predicted decrease in thermal conductivity due to Zr doping was in excellent agreement with measured values.' The agreement requires the full treatment of the defect—mass mismatch plus changes in interatomic force constants and structural relaxation—because a mass-only perturbation underpredicted the reduction; however, the computed values still overestimate measurements below 100 K, a discrepancy the authors attribute to inadequate mesh resolution, unmodeled native defects such as hafnium impurities, or the assumption that all phonon modes are excited at low temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation replaces the measured 1.13 at% zirconium with a single zirconium atom in a 125-site supercell (about 0.8 at%) and assumes that one isolated defect's scattering rate applies directly, with no concentration scaling, defect-defect interactions, or finite-size corrections.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same Green's function T-matrix workflow can be applied to other soluble fission products (krypton, xenon, iodine) in ThO2, giving parameter-free predictions of their thermal-conductivity impact.
  • Fuel performance codes like BISON could incorporate these mechanistic degradation models, replacing multiplicative empirical correction factors that are only valid for the conditions they were fitted to.
  • The validated methodology can be extended to other next-generation nuclear fuel materials where experimental data are scarce.
  • The fitted Klemens-model S2 values (0.21 from experiment, 0.4 from first-principles data, and 1.09 using alternative ionic radii) show that classical parameterized models are unreliable, which increases the value of a first-principles alternative.
  • Low-temperature measurements below 100 K expose a gap in the model, motivating refined q-meshes and inclusion of trace impurities to close it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the dilute-defect assumption would be to measure conductivity across a concentration series: if the reduction stays linear in Zr fraction, the single-defect T-matrix result is robust; if it curves, defect-defect interactions or the concentration mismatch in the supercell matter.
  • The unexplained sub-100 K discrepancy could be probed by re-measuring a Zr-doped sample after purification to remove hafnium, a common Zr impurity, and by computing with a finer q-point grid that resolves low-frequency phonons.
  • The same combined experimental–computational framework could be applied to UO2, where more historical thermal-conductivity data exist, to see whether the non-perturbative method also resolves decades of ambiguity in fission-product scattering cross-sections.
  • If the method matures, it could produce a library of phonon-defect scattering rates for all significant fission products and defect types, serving as the mechanistic core of a next-generation fuel performance model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports thermal conductivity measurements of a hydrothermically grown Zr-doped ThO2 single crystal using spatial domain thermoreflectance over 77–300 K. The measured Zr concentration is 1.13 at% by XRF. The authors compare the measurements with first-principles lattice thermal conductivity calculations for ThO2 and for a single Zr substitution computed with the non-perturbative Green's function T-matrix method from their prior work (Ref. [33]). They report good agreement from 100–300 K, with some overprediction below 100 K, and interpret this as experimental confirmation of the first-principles defect-scattering methodology. The paper also fits the data to the Klemens model and discusses the limitations of empirical scattering parameters.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this would be one of the first direct experimental validations of a parameter-free, non-perturbative treatment of phonon–point-defect scattering for fission products in an oxide nuclear fuel. The methodology could then be used to generate mechanistically grounded thermal conductivity degradation models for fuel performance codes. The experimental data on Zr-doped ThO2 single crystals are themselves a useful contribution. However, the strength of the validation claim is currently limited by several unresolved quantitative issues, described below.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III and Fig. 3] The measured Zr concentration is 1.13 at%, yet Fig. 3 labels the calculation as '1 at% Zr-doped' and Section II.C describes a single Zr atom in a 5×5×5 supercell, which corresponds to about 0.8 at% if interpreted literally. The manuscript does not state the concentration used to scale the single-defect Green's function scattering rate when solving the BTE. In the dilute limit the defect scattering rate is linear in concentration, so a 13% or 30% concentration mismatch will shift the predicted thermal conductivity by a comparable amount. The paper must state the scaling concentration and show how the predicted curve changes if the measured 1.13 at% is used instead. Without this, the claimed quantitative agreement from 100–300 K is not established.
  2. [Section II.B and Fig. 3] No experimental uncertainty bars are shown for the SDTR thermal conductivity data, although the text states that at least four measurement sets were collected at three modulation frequencies. An uncertainty estimate is essential here because the key claims are quantitative: agreement with the first-principles prediction from 100–300 K and a discrepancy below 100 K. Without error bars, it is impossible to judge whether the concentration sensitivity discussed in the previous comment is within experimental scatter.
  3. [Section III] The pristine ThO2 baseline is chosen as the highest-conductivity sample from a prior work, and an isotopic scattering model with an unspecified impurity concentration is then used to bring the LDA calculation into agreement with that measurement. The text states: 'We acknowledge that the measured samples contain impurities, which we modeled using an isotopic scattering model, assuming these impurities are primarily substitutional.' This introduces an adjustable element into the supposedly first-principles baseline. The paper must specify the impurity concentration and mass disorder used in that Tamura-term calculation, and whether the same term is applied in the Zr-doped calculation. If the impurity concentration is fitted to the pristine data, the validation of the defect-scattering methodology is weaker than claimed.
  4. [Section IV] The Klemens-model comparison reports fitted values of S^2 = 0.21 (from the experimental data), S^2 = 4.36 (using Shannon ionic radii and epsilon=100), S^2 = 1.09 (using Horii et al. radii), and S^2 = 0.4 (from first-principles data). This large spread is used to argue that empirical models are unreliable. The argument would be more convincing if the first-principles-derived value were obtained without fitting to the experimental thermal conductivity. Please clarify whether S^2 = 0.4 comes from an independent first-principles calculation or from a fit to the computed thermal conductivity curve.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] There are several typographical errors: 'Greens function' should be 'Green's function', 'Several report have aimed' should be 'Several reports have aimed', and the bracketed citation in 'fundamental understanding of thermal transport phenomena [[5, 21–23]' has an extra bracket.
  2. [Section II.B] The XRF source parameters are given as '50 kV, 300 A'. This is almost certainly a typo for microamperes (μA) or milliamperes (mA); please correct the unit.
  3. [Section III] The text says the crystal was 'intentionally doped with one atomic percent of Zr' and later reports the XRF value as 1.13 at%. These two statements should be reconciled explicitly, since the comparison in Fig. 3 uses '1 at% Zr-doped' in the caption.
  4. [References] References [23] and [40] appear to refer to the same work (same authors, title, and journal) with different volume/page numbers; please check and consolidate.
  5. [Section IV] The sentence 'epsilon is mainly used as fitting parameter' is grammatically incomplete; also, the notation S^2 in Eq. (1) is not consistently defined with the fitted values S2 in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Zr-doped thermal-conductivity prediction is carried over from prior first-principles work and tested against new SDTR data; the underdocumented pristine-baseline impurity correction is a reproducibility concern, not a circular step.

full rationale

The central claim — that the measured 77–300 K thermal conductivity of Zr-doped ThO2 matches the Green's-function T-matrix prediction — is a genuine out-of-sample test. The Zr defect scattering rates were computed in the authors' prior work (ref [33]) using supercells and interatomic force constants described in Sec. II.C, and the present SDTR experiment provides new data that were not used as input to that calculation. No equation or parameter in the T-matrix calculation is shown to have been fitted to the doped-sample measurements, so the comparison does not reduce by construction. The pristine-baseline calculation does include an isotope/impurity scattering term: 'We acknowledge that the measured samples contain impurities, which we modeled using an isotopic scattering model, assuming these impurities are primarily substitutional. By incorporating isotope-phonon scattering using Tamura’s methodology, we achieved excellent agreement with the experimentally measured thermal conductivity.' The paper does not specify the impurity concentration or whether it was adjusted to match the pristine data; that is an underdocumented calibration of the baseline in Section III (Figure 3 discussion), but the paper's stated conclusion concerns the doping-induced decrease, which is not forced by that baseline choice. Similarly, the difference between the nominal 1 at% Zr used in Fig. 3 and the XRF-measured 1.13 at% (or the literal 0.8 at% of a 1/125 supercell) is a quantitative-accuracy concern rather than a circularity, because the paper does not state how concentration was used to scale the single-defect scattering rate. Self-citations to refs [32,33] are load-bearing for the computational and pristine-baseline inputs, but because those are prior, externally falsifiable predictions rather than results defined in terms of the present measurements, they do not constitute circularity under the stated criteria.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation is carried over from the authors' prior paper (ref [33]); the present contribution is the synthesis, characterization, and thermal measurement of a Zr-doped ThO2 single crystal plus a comparison against those published predictions. The main added premises are that a single-defect supercell at about 0.8 at% represents the measured 1.13 at% doping, and that the measured conductivity difference between pristine and doped samples is caused entirely by substitutional Zr.

free parameters (3)
  • Klemens S2 scattering parameter = 0.21
    Fit to the measured Zr-doped ThO2 data in Section IV using the conductivity model of ref [70]. Used only as a classical baseline comparison, not in the first-principles prediction.
  • Klemens epsilon parameter = 100
    Assumed typical value in Section IV to compute S2 from ionic radius mismatch; taken from literature, not fitted, but affects the classical comparison.
  • Impurity isotope scattering term for pristine ThO2
    Section III states the measured pristine sample contains impurities modeled with an isotopic scattering model; the paper does not report the impurity concentration or mass variance used, so it is unclear whether this term was tuned to match the pristine data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption LDA phonon dispersions and anharmonic force constants describe ThO2 thermal conductivity adequately
    The paper relies on LDA from ref [33] and states LDA overestimates bond stiffness, so the computed pristine conductivity is an upper limit (Section III).
  • domain assumption Phonon-phonon, isotope, and point-defect scattering rates are independent and additive
    Total thermal conductivity is obtained by combining scattering rates from separate BTE and Green's function calculations, implicitly using Matthiessen's rule (Section II.C).
  • domain assumption The Green's function T-matrix defect scattering rates from ref [33] are valid for the synthesized Zr-doped crystal
    The paper does not reproduce the calculation; it cites ref [33] by the same group for details on the Zr-doped supercell (Section II.C and IV).
  • domain assumption The crystal is stoichiometric and contains no unaccounted defects or impurities that significantly affect thermal conductivity
    Raman and PL show no strong defect signature, but the paper itself lists Hf impurity as a possible cause of the low-temperature discrepancy (Section IV).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experimental Confirmation of First-Principles Thermal Conductivity in Zirconium-Doped ThO$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UD5MQ3Z3

@misc{pith2026241212329,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experimental Confirmation of First-Principles Thermal Conductivity in Zirconium-Doped ThO$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UD5MQ3Z3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12329}
}
abstract

The degradation of thermal conductivity in advanced nuclear fuels due to the accumulation of fission products and irradiation-induced defects is inevitable, and must be considered as part of safety and efficiency analyses of nuclear reactors. This study examines the thermal conductivity of a zirconium-doped ThO$_2$ crystal, synthesized via the hydrothermal method using a spatial domain thermo-reflectance technique. Zirconium is one of the soluble fission products in oxide fuels that can effectively scatter heat-carrying phonons in the crystalline lattice of fuel. Thus, thermal property measurements of zirconium-doped ThO$_2$ single crystals provide insights into the effects of substitutional zirconium doping, isolated from extrinsic factors such as grain boundary scattering. The experimental results are compared with first-principles calculations of the lattice thermal conductivity of ThO$_2$, employing an iterative solution of the Peierls-Boltzmann transport equation. Additionally, the non-perturbative Greens function methodology is utilized to compute phonon-point defect scattering rates, accounting for local distortions around point defects, including mass difference changes, interatomic force constants, and structural relaxation. The congruence between the predicted results from first-principles calculations and the measured temperature-dependent thermal conductivity validates the computational methodology. Furthermore, the methodologies employed in this study enable systematic investigations of thermal conductivity reduction by fission products, potentially leading to the development of more accurate fuel performance codes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12329 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The synthesized crystal of Zr-doped-ThO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The PL measurements ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. This figure shows the comparison of the thermal con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Malakkal, A

    L. Malakkal, A. Katre, S. Zhou, C. Jiang, D. H. Hur- ley, C. A. Marianetti, and M. Khafizov, First-principles determination of the phonon-point defect scattering and thermal transport due to fission products in ThO2, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 025401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    J. S. Herring, P. E. MacDonald, K. D. Weaver, and C. Kullberg, Low cost, proliferation resistant, uranium- thorium dioxide fuels for light water reactors, Nuclear Engineering and Design 203, 65 (2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [2]

    P. R. Hania and F. C. Klaassen, 3.04 – thorium oxide fuel (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [3]

    S. F. Ashley, G. T. Parks, W. J. Nuttall, C. Boxall, and R. W. Grimes, Thorium fuel has risks, Nature 492, 31 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [4]

    Kutty, M

    T. Kutty, M. Nair, P. Sengupta, U. Basak, A. Kumar, and H. Kamath, Characterization of (Th,U)O 2 fuel pel- lets made by impregnation technique, Journal of Nuclear Materials 374, 9 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [5]

    D. H. Hurley, A. El-Azab, M. S. Bryan, M. W. D. Cooper, C. A. Dennett, K. Gofryk, L. He, M. Khafizov, G. H. Lander, M. E. Manley, J. M. Mann, C. A. Marianetti, K. Rickert, F. A. Selim, M. R. Tonks, and J. P. Wharry, Thermal energy transport in oxide nuclear fuel, Chemical Reviews 122, 3711 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [6]

    1450 (INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Vienna, 2005)

    Thorium Fuel Cycle - Potential Benefits and Chal- lenges, TECDOC Series No. 1450 (INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Vienna, 2005)

    work page 2005

  8. [7]

    W. R. Deskins, A. Khanolkar, S. Mazumder, C. A. Den- nett, K. Bawane, Z. Hua, J. Ferrigno, L. He, J. M. Mann, M. Khafizov, D. H. Hurley, and A. El-Azab, A combined theoretical-experimental investigation of thermal trans- port in low-dose irradiated thorium dioxide, Acta Mate- rialia 241, 118379 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 72 references
  1. [8]

    Malakkal, A

    L. Malakkal, A. Prasad, E. Jossou, J. Ranasinghe, B. Szpunar, L. Bichler, and J. Szpunar, Thermal con- ductivity of bulk and porous ThO 2: Atomistic and ex- perimental study, Journal of Alloys and Compounds798, 507 (2019)

    2019

  2. [9]

    Worrall, N

    M. Worrall, N. Woolstenhulme, and C. Turner, Final CRADA Report: Accelerated Burn-up Accumulation Test of Clean Core Thorium Energy Designated ANEEL Fuel (2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    I. B. of Mines, Indian minerals yearbook 2019 (part-iii: Mineral reviews) rare earths, Indian Bureau of Mines (2020)

    2020

  4. [11]

    D. R. Olander, Fundamental aspects of nuclear reactor fuel elements 10.2172/7343826 (1976)

    1976 doi

  5. [12]

    Kawano, J

    T. Kawano, J. Randrup, N. Schunck, P. Talou, and F. Tovesson, Fission fragments and fission products, in Nuclear Fission: Theories, Experiments and Applica- tions, edited by P. Talou and R. Vogt (Springer Inter- national Publishing, Cham, 2023) pp. 141–262

    2023

  6. [13]

    R. L. Williamson, J. D. Hales, S. R. Novascone, G. Pas- tore, K. A. Gamble, B. W. Spencer, W. Jiang, S. A. Pitts, A. Casagranda, D. Schwen, A. X. Zabriskie, A. Toptan, 8 R. Gardner, C. Matthews, W. Liu, and H. Chen, Bison: A flexible code for advanced simulation of the perfor-...

    2021

  7. [14]

    Magni, A

    A. Magni, A. Del Nevo, L. Luzzi, D. Rozzia, M. Adorni, A. Schubert, and P. Van Uffelen, Chapter 8 - the transuranus fuel performance code, in Nuclear Power Plant Design and Analysis Codes , Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, edited by J. Wang, X. Li, C. Allison, and J. Hoho...

    2021

  8. [15]

    Intro ¨ ıni, I

    C. Intro ¨ ıni, I. Rami` ere, J. Sercombe, B. Michel, T. Helfer, and J. Fauque, Alcyone: the fuel performance code of the pleiades platform dedicated to pwr fuel rods behavior, Annals of Nuclear Energy 207, 110711 (2024)

    2024

  9. [16]

    Van Uffelen, J

    P. Van Uffelen, J. Hales, W. Li, G. Rossiter, and R. Williamson, A review of fuel performance modelling, Journal of Nuclear Materials 516, 373 (2019)

    2019

  10. [17]

    Lucuta, H

    P. Lucuta, H. Matzke, and I. Hastings, A pragmatic ap- proach to modelling thermal conductivity of irradiated UO2 fuel: Review and recommendations, Journal of Nu- clear Materials 232, 166 (1996)

    1996

  11. [18]

    Ferrigno, T

    J. Ferrigno, T. Pavlov, N. Poudel, D. Salvato, C. Tsai, B. Merritt, A. Hansen, T. Munro, F. Cappia, and M. Khafizov, Analysis of radially resolved thermal con- ductivity in high burnup mixed oxide fuel and compar- ison to thermal conductivity correlations implemented in fuel p...

    2024

  12. [19]

    Magni, T

    A. Magni, T. Barani, A. Del Nevo, D. Pizzocri, D. Staicu, P. Van Uffelen, and L. Luzzi, Modelling and assessment of thermal conductivity and melting behaviour of mox fuel for fast reactor applications, Journal of Nuclear Materials 541, 152410 (2020)

    2020

  13. [20]

    Ferrigno, S

    J. Ferrigno, S. Adnan, and M. Khafizov, Influence of point defect accumulation on in-pile thermal conductivity degradation: Fuel rod defect distribution and deviation between in-pile and post irradiation thermal conductiv- ity, Journal of Nuclear Materials 573, 154108 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    C. A. Dennett, W. R. Deskins, M. Khafizov, Z. Hua, A. Khanolkar, K. Bawane, L. Fu, J. M. Mann, C. A. Marianetti, L. He, D. H. Hurley, and A. El-Azab, An integrated experimental and computational investigation of defect and microstructural effects on thermal transport in thoriu...

    2021

  15. [22]

    X.-Y. Liu, M. W. D. Cooper, K. J. McClellan, J. C. Lash- ley, D. D. Byler, B. D. C. Bell, R. W. Grimes, C. R. Stanek, and D. A. Andersson, Molecular dynamics simu- lation of thermal transport in UO 2 containing uranium, oxygen, and fission-product defects, Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, ...

    2016

  16. [23]

    M. Jin, C. A. Dennett, D. H. Hurley, and M. Khafizov, Impact of small defects and dislocation loops on phonon scattering and thermal transport in ThO2, Journal of Nu- clear Materials 566, 153758 (2022)

    2022

  17. [24]

    P. G. Klemens, The scattering of low-frequency lattice waves by static imperfections, Proceedings of the Physi- cal Society. Section A 68, 1113 (1955)

    1955

  18. [25]

    Bonev, N

    P. Bonev, N. Chauvin, D. Staicu, E. Dahms, G. Montag- nier, D. Papaioannou, J.-C. Dumas, I. Boukhris, I. Vial- lard, M. Lainet, J. Lamontagne, and K. Hanifi, New rec- ommendation for the thermal conductivity of irradiated (U, Pu)O 2 fuels under fast reactor conditions. compar-...

    2023

  19. [26]

    Horii, S

    Y. Horii, S. Hirooka, H. Uno, M. Ogasawara, T. Tamura, T. Yamada, N. Furusawa, T. Murakami, and M. Kato, Thermal conductivity measurement of ura- nium–plutonium mixed oxide doped with Nd/Sm as sim- ulated fission products, Journal of Nuclear Materials588, 154799 (2024)

    2024

  20. [27]

    B. Chen, L. Malakkal, M. Khafizov, D. H. Hurley, and M. Jin, Phonon modal analysis of thermal transport in ThO2 with point defects using equilibrium molecular dy- namics, Journal of Nuclear Materials 601, 155314 (2024)

    2024

  21. [28]

    Khafizov, V

    M. Khafizov, V. Chauhan, Y. Wang, F. Riyad, N. Hang, and D. Hurley, Investigation of thermal transport in com- posites and ion beam irradiated materials for nuclear en- ergy applications, Journal of Materials Research 32, 204 (2017)

    2017

  22. [29]

    C. A. Dennett, Z. Hua, A. Khanolkar, T. Yao, P. K. Mor- gan, T. A. Prusnick, N. Poudel, A. French, K. Gofryk, L. He, L. Shao, M. Khafizov, D. B. Turner, J. M. Mann, and D. H. Hurley, The influence of lattice defects, recom- bination, and clustering on thermal transport in sing...

    2020

  23. [30]

    R. W. Grimes, Simulating the behaviour of inert gases in UO2, in Fundamental Aspects of Inert Gases in Solids , edited by S. E. Donnelly and J. H. Evans (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1991) pp. 415–429

    1991

  24. [31]

    Ronchi, M

    C. Ronchi, M. Sheindlin, D. Staicu, and M. Kinoshita, Effect of burn-up on the thermal conductivity of ura- nium dioxide up to 100000mwdt-1, Journal of Nuclear Materials 327, 58 (2004)

    2004

  25. [32]

    Z. Hua, S. Adnan, A. R. Khanolkar, K. Rickert, D. B. Turner, T. A. Prusnick, J. M. Mann, D. H. Hurley, M. Khafizov, and C. A. Dennett, Thermal conductiv- ity suppression in uranium-doped thorium dioxide due to phonon-spin interactions, Journal of Materiomics 10, 709 (2024)

    2024

  26. [35]

    Saoudi, D

    M. Saoudi, D. Staicu, J. Mouris, A. Bergeron, H. Hamil- ton, M. Naji, D. Freis, and M. Cologna, Thermal diffusiv- ity and conductivity of thorium- uranium mixed oxides, Journal of Nuclear Materials 500, 381 (2018)

    2018

  27. [36]

    Turnbull, C

    J. Turnbull, C. Walker, D. Staicu, D. Papaioannou, and S. Yagnik, Effect of burn-up on the thermal conductiv- ity of light water reactor fuel: Results of investigations employing the laser flash technique, Journal of Nuclear Materials 580, 154398 (2023)

    2023

  28. [37]

    Cooper, S

    M. Cooper, S. Middleburgh, and R. Grimes, Mod- elling the thermal conductivity of U xTh1−xO2 and UxPu1−xO2, Journal of Nuclear Materials 466, 29 (2015)

    2015

  29. [38]

    J. Park, E. B. Farf´ an, K. Mitchell, A. Resnick, C. En- riquez, and T. Yee, Sensitivity of thermal transport in thorium dioxide to defects, Journal of Nuclear Materials 504, 198 (2018). 9

    2018

  30. [39]

    Rahman, B

    M. Rahman, B. Szpunar, and J. Szpunar, Dependence of thermal conductivity on fission-product defects and va- cancy concentration in thorium dioxide, Journal of Nu- clear Materials 532, 152050 (2020)

    2020

  31. [40]

    M. Jin, C. A. Dennett, D. H. Hurley, and M. Khafizov, Impact of small defects and dislocation loops on phonon scattering and thermal transport in ThO2, Journal of Nu- clear Materials , 153758 (2022)

    2022

  32. [41]

    W. R. Deskins, A. Hamed, T. Kumagai, C. A. Dennett, J. Peng, M. Khafizov, D. Hurley, and A. El-Azab, Ther- mal conductivity of ThO2: Effect of point defect disorder, Journal of Applied Physics 129, 075102 (2021)

    2021

  33. [42]

    Y. Zhou, Z. Fan, G. Qin, J.-Y. Yang, T. Ouyang, and M. Hu, Methodology perspective of computing thermal transport in low-dimensional materials and nanostruc- tures: The old and the new, ACS Omega 3, 3278 (2018)

    2018

  34. [43]

    To overcome these limitations, Malakkal et al

    indicated that the empirical potential used in previ- ous studies requires further optimization for accurately predicting ThO 2’s thermal conductivity in both perfect crystals and those with complex defects. To overcome these limitations, Malakkal et al. [33] predicted phonon ...

  35. [44]

    M. Jin, M. Khafizov, C. Jiang, S. Zhou, C. A. Marianetti, M. S. Bryan, M. E. Manley, and D. H. Hurley, Assess- ment of empirical interatomic potential to predict ther- mal conductivity in ThO 2 and UO 2, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 33, 275402 (2021)

    2021

  36. [45]

    M. Mann, D. Thompson, K. Serivalsatit, T. M. Tritt, J. Ballato, and J. Kolis, Hydrothermal growth and ther- mal property characterization of ThO 2 single crystals, Crystal Growth & Design 10, 2146 (2010)

    2010

  37. [46]

    J. P. Feser and D. G. Cahill, Probing anisotropic heat transport using time-domain thermoreflectance with off- set laser spots, Review of Scientific Instruments 83, 104901 (2012)

    2012

  38. [47]

    D. H. Hurley, R. S. Schley, M. Khafizov, and B. L. Wendt, Local measurement of thermal conductivity and diffusiv- ity, Review of Scientific Instruments 86, 123901 (2015)

    2015

  39. [48]

    Z. Hua, H. Ban, M. Khafizov, R. Schley, R. Kennedy, and D. H. Hurley, Spatially localized measurement of ther- mal conductivity using a hybrid photothermal technique, Journal of Applied Physics 111, 103505 (2012)

    2012

  40. [49]

    A. A. Maznev, J. Hartmann, and M. Reichling, Thermal wave propagation in thin films on substrates, Journal of Applied Physics 78, 5266 (1995)

    1995

  41. [50]

    R. B. Wilson, B. A. Apgar, L. W. Martin, and D. G. Cahill, Thermoreflectance of metal transducers for opti- cal pump-probe studies of thermal properties, Opt. Ex- press 20, 28829 (2012)

    2012

  42. [51]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations in- cluding exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  43. [52]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  44. [53]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  45. [54]

    J. P. Perdew and A. Zunger, Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1981)

    1981

  46. [55]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- tra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  47. [56]

    A. E. Shields, D. Santos-Carballal, and N. H. de Leeuw, A density functional theory study of uranium-doped thoria and uranium adatoms on the major surfaces of thorium dioxide, Journal of Nuclear Materials 473, 99 (2016)

    2016

  48. [57]

    Y. Lu, Y. Yang, and P. Zhang, Thermodynamic proper- ties and structural stability of thorium dioxide, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 24, 225801 (2012)

    2012

  49. [58]

    Togo and I

    A. Togo and I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calcu- lations in materials science, Scripta Materialia 108, 1 (2015)

    2015

  50. [59]

    W. Li, J. Carrete, N. A. Katcho, and N. Mingo, Sheng- bte: A solver of the boltzmann transport equation for phonons, Computer Physics Communications 185, 1747 (2014)

    2014

  51. [60]

    W. Yi, S. Shun-Li, F. Huazhi, L. Zi-Kui, and C. L. Qing, First-principles calculations of lattice dynamics and ther- mal properties of polar solids, npj Computational Mate- rials 2, 16006 (2016)

    2016

  52. [61]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. De Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Gi- annozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics 73, 515–562 (2001)

    2001

  53. [62]

    Tamura, Isotope scattering of dispersive phonons in Ge, Phys

    S.-I. Tamura, Isotope scattering of dispersive phonons in Ge, Phys. Rev. B 27, 858 (1983)

    1983

  54. [63]

    Katre, J

    A. Katre, J. Carrete, B. Dongre, G. K. H. Madsen, and N. Mingo, Exceptionally strong phonon scattering by B substitution in cubic SiC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 075902 (2017)

    2017

  55. [64]

    E. Xiao, H. Ma, M. S. Bryan, L. Fu, J. M. Mann, B. Winn, D. L. Abernathy, R. P. Hermann, A. R. Khanolkar, C. A. Dennett, D. H. Hurley, M. E. Manley, and C. A. Marianetti, Validating first-principles phonon lifetimes via inelastic neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. B 106, 144310 (2022)

    2022

  56. [65]

    V. G. Keramidas and W. B. White, Raman spectra of ox- ides with the fluorite structure, The Journal of Chemical Physics 59, 1561 (1973)

    1973

  57. [66]

    Rickert, T

    K. Rickert, T. A. Prusnick, E. Hunt, A. French, D. B. Turner, C. A. Dennett, L. Shao, and J. M. Mann, Raman and photoluminescence evaluation of ion-induced damage uniformity in tho2, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Material...

    2022

  58. [67]

    A. Mock, C. Dugan, S. Knight, R. Korlacki, J. M. Mann, M. M. Kimani, J. C. Petrosky, P. A. Dowben, and M. Schubert, Band-to-band transitions and critical points in the near-infrared to vacuum ultraviolet dielec- tric functions of single crystal urania and thoria, Applied Physi...

    2019

  59. [68]

    M. Kato, T. Oki, M. Watanabe, S. Hirooka, R. Vauchy, T. Ozawa, T. Uwaba, Y. Ikusawa, H. Nakamura, and M. Machida, A science-based mixed oxide property model for developing advanced oxide nuclear fuels, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 107, 2998 (2024)

    2024

  60. [69]

    Fukushima, T

    S. Fukushima, T. Ohmichi, and M. Handa, The effect of rare earths on thermal conductivity of uranium, pluto- nium and their mived ovide fuels, Journal of the Less Common Metals 121, 631 (1986), proceedings of Ac- tinides 85, Aix en Provence - Part I

    1986

  61. [70]

    Duriez, J.-P

    C. Duriez, J.-P. Alessandri, T. Gervais, and Y. Philippon- neau, Thermal conductivity of hypostoichiometric low pu content (upu)o2-x mixed oxide, Journal of Nuclear Ma- terials 277, 143 (2000)

    2000

  62. [71]

    V. S. Chauhan, J. Pakarinen, T. Yao, L. He, D. H. Hur- ley, and M. Khafizov, Indirect characterization of point defects in proton irradiated ceria, Materialia 15, 101019 (2021)

    2021

  63. [72]

    Z. Hua, S. Adnan, A. R. Khanolkar, K. Rickert, D. B. Turner, T. A. Prusnick, J. M. Mann, D. H. Hurley, M. Khafizov, and C. A. Dennett, Thermal conductiv- 10 ity suppression in uranium-doped thorium dioxide due to phonon resonant scattering (2023), arXiv:2303.01659 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2023 arXiv

  64. [73]

    R. D. Shannon, Revised effective ionic radii and sys- tematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides, Acta Crystallographica Section A 32, 751 (1976)

    1976

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.