REVIEW 2 cited by
Entropy-Based Decoding for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Augmenting Large Language Models (LLMs) with retrieved external knowledge has proven effective for improving the factual accuracy of generated responses. Despite their success, retrieval-augmented LLMs still face the distractibility issue, where the generated responses are negatively influenced by noise from both external and internal knowledge sources. In this paper, we introduce a novel, training-free decoding method guided by entropy considerations to mitigate this issue. Our approach utilizes entropy-based document-parallel ensemble decoding to prioritize low-entropy distributions from retrieved documents, thereby enhancing the extraction of relevant information of context. Additionally, it incorporates a contrastive decoding mechanism that contrasts the obtained low-entropy ensemble distribution with the high-entropy distribution derived from the model's internal knowledge across layers, which ensures a greater emphasis on reliable external information. Extensive experiments on open-domain question answering datasets demonstrate the superiority of our method.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Context-Fidelity Boosting: Enhancing Faithful Generation through Watermark-Inspired Decoding
Context-Fidelity Boosting reduces faithfulness hallucinations by applying context-based logit boosts to source-supported tokens during LLM decoding.
-
What's on My Network? Using Large Language Models to Identify Real-World IoT Devices at Scale
An instruction-tuned LLaMA 3.1 8B model, trained on LLM-generated pseudo-labels, is claimed to identify IoT device vendors from passive network metadata with 98.25% top-1 accuracy across 2,015 vendors.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.