Quantum Emergence of Linear Particle Accelerator and Anomalous Photon-induced Near-field Electron Microscopy in a Strong Coupling Regime

Ido Kaminer; Jing Zhou; Yiming Pan

Quantum Emergence of Linear Particle Accelerator and Anomalous Photon-induced Near-field Electron Microscopy in a Strong Coupling Regime

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that a free-electron wavepacket with an energy spread wider than the photon energy is accelerated by quantum interference between overlapping photon sidebands, making laser-driven acceleration a quantum effect.

desk verdict Correct but modest: the 'quantum emergence' of linear acceleration is the classical limit of overlapping PINEM sidebands, and the APINEM part is largely the authors' own previous PRL. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05740 v2 pith:UFDQ5KLK submitted 2019-08-14 quant-ph physics.acc-phphysics.optics

Jing Zhou , Ido Kaminer , Yiming Pan This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-phphysics.acc-phphysics.optics

keywords photon-inducednear-fieldelectronmicroscopy(PINEM)anomalousPINEM(APINEM)quantuminterferenceofphotonsidebandsfree-electronwavepacketlaser-drivenparticleaccelerationstrong-fieldlight-matterinteractionspectralfocusingattosecondbunching

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the familiar PINEM spectrum—the symmetric ladder of sidebands spaced by the photon energy—is only one corner of a single quantum interaction. When the electron's intrinsic energy uncertainty $\sigma_E$ is larger than the photon energy $\hbar\omega$, neighboring photon sidebands overlap and interfere; their anti-symmetric Bessel cross terms shift the mean electron momentum, producing a net energy transfer that grows linearly with the field strength. In that point-particle limit the electron behaves as a classical point charge, so a linear particle accelerator emerges from quantum mechanics rather than from a classical force. The same interference, combined with a pre-interaction free drift that chirps the wavepacket, gives anomalous PINEM: spectral focusing that sharpens energy-loss resolution and periodic momentum bunching. If the account is right, three seemingly different effects—PINEM spectra, laser-driven acceleration, and attosecond electron bunching—become regimes of one coherence-controlled Hamiltonian.

What carries the argument

The central object is the modulated electron momentum wavefunction of Eq. (2), a coherent sum of Bessel-weighted Gaussian photon sidebands separated by $\delta p = \hbar\omega/v_0$. The controlling parameter is the decay parameter $\Gamma_0 = \hbar\omega/(2\sigma_E)$, the ratio of the photon energy to the electron's intrinsic energy uncertainty. The mechanism that carries the argument is quantum interference between overlapping sidebands: when $\Gamma_0 \ll 1$, the anti-symmetric Bessel cross terms $J_n J_{n+1}$ in $|\psi|^2$ convert overlap into a net momentum shift $2g\hbar\omega\cos\phi_0$, while decoherence removes those cross terms and kills the effect. A pre-interaction drift adds a chirp $\xi$ to each Gaussian in Eq. (5), transforming the same overlap into spectral focusing and the APINEM spacing $\delta p_{\mathrm{APINEM}} \propto \lambda/L_0$. This single interference machinery generates all three regimes from one Hamiltonian.

What would settle it

Prepare a single-electron wavepacket with $\sigma_E \gg \hbar\omega$ ($\Gamma_0 \ll 1$), let it pass through a strong laser-illuminated near-field with controlled phase $\phi_0$, and record the EELS spectrum. The central claim fails if the mean energy shift is not linear in $g$, does not follow $\Delta E = 2g\hbar\omega\cos\phi_0$ as $\phi_0$ is scanned, or appears only as incoherent spectral broadening like the decoherence case in the paper's Fig. 1h.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that in the point-particle limit $\Gamma_0 = \hbar\omega/(2\sigma_E) \ll 1$, the net energy transfer to a free electron from a strong optical near-field is $\Delta E = 2g\hbar\omega\cos\phi_0$, where $g$ is the coupling strength and $\phi_0$ is the carrier-envelope phase. This formula follows from the modulated momentum wavefunction of Eq. (2): the Bessel-function sidebands $J_n(2g)$ are weighted by Gaussians of width $\sigma_p$, and when those Gaussians overlap, the cross terms $J_n J_{n+1}$ are anti-symmetric under $n \to -n-1$, so probability shifts toward higher momenta. In the opposite plane-wave limit $\Gamma_0 \gg 1$, sidebands are resolved and symmetric, giving $\Delta E = 0$ and the familiar PINEM comb. The paper further claims that a pre-interaction drift of duration $t_0$ chirps each Gaussian, and the same overlapping-sideband interference then produces APINEM: spectral focusing at an optimal drift length and a sideband spacing inversely proportional to that drift length. Thus LPA and APINEM are presented as analytic consequences of the same PINEM-kind Hamiltonian, not as separate effects.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a single free-electron wavepacket can have an intrinsic energy spread $\sigma_E$ much larger than the photon energy $\hbar\omega$ while remaining one coherent pure state; if that coherence is lost, the sideband-overlap interference disappears and the spectrum only broadens instead of accelerating.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

An electron with energy spread wider than the photon energy will gain or lose net energy from a laser near-field, with the sign and magnitude set by the carrier-envelope phase $\phi_0$ and the field strength $g$.
The same electron can show symmetric PINEM sidebands in the infrared ($\sigma_E = 0.3$ eV $< \hbar\omega$) and point-particle acceleration in the THz range ($\hbar\omega = 5$ meV), so the wave/particle character of the interaction is tunable through the ratio $\hbar\omega/\sigma_E$.
A pre-interaction drift before the near-field interaction can compress the EELS energy spread by roughly a factor of three at an optimal drift length, and its APINEM sideband spacing is proportional to wavelength and inversely proportional to drift length.
A post-interaction drift converts the same sideband interference into spatial/temporal density bunching at attosecond scales, connecting the mechanism to attosecond electron pulse-train generation.
At the transition $\sigma_E \approx \hbar\omega$ the spectrum shows an Airy-like pattern, indicating a continuous PINEM-to-LPA crossover rather than a sharp boundary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Our inference: because the acceleration changes sign with $\cos\phi_0$, scanning the carrier-envelope phase in a dielectric laser accelerator would distinguish this interference mechanism from a classical force picture, which would not predict the same phase-reversal.
Our inference: the spectral focusing of APINEM suggests a route to higher energy resolution in electron microscopy without a monochromator, since the narrowing comes from coherent chirp control rather than from discarding electrons.
Our inference: the strong decoherence sensitivity implies the effect could serve as a probe of which-path information or environmental coupling in free-electron–light interactions: any partial which-path information should suppress the net acceleration.
Our inference: the condition $\sigma_E > \hbar\omega$ is set by the ratio of energy uncertainty to photon energy, so the same mechanism might extend to heavier charged particles or to longer wavelengths, although the coherence requirement would be far more demanding.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The one thing you should know about this paper is that the central claim checks out, but it's smaller than the title suggests. Starting from the standard PINEM wavefunction, the authors show that when the intrinsic energy uncertainty σ_E exceeds the photon energy ħω, neighbouring photon sidebands overlap and the cross terms in |ψ|² produce a net energy shift ΔE = 2g ħω cos φ0 exp(−Γ0²/2). In the point-particle limit Γ0 ≪ 1 this reduces to the classical impulse e∫F dz. The derivation is simple, internally consistent, and Fig. 1e verifies Eq. (3) against direct integration. That is a genuine new result, though not a surprising one: broad wavepackets localize in time, so you expect classical behaviour.

What the paper does well: it spells out the quantum-to-classical transition as a function of σ_E, shows the phase dependence, and notes that decoherence kills the effect. The comparison between pre-interaction drift (spectral focusing/APINEM) and post-interaction drift (attosecond bunching) is a useful clarification. The writing is honest about the limits, e.g. no experimental verification yet.

Where it is soft: the novelty is moderate. The APINEM section is built on the authors' own PRL (ref 11); the spectral focusing shown in Fig. 2 is essentially a chirp-compensation effect already implicit there. The load-bearing assumption — a single coherent pure state with σ_E ≫ ħω and controlled phase φ0 — is stated but not made easy to fulfill; Fig. 1h shows decoherence destroys the effect, and the experimental feasibility discussion at the end is hand-wavy. Also, the chirp parameter in Eq. (5) is introduced without a derivation. None of this undermines the math; it just limits the paper's reach.

Bottom line: this is a solid theoretical note, not a breakthrough. It is for people working on PINEM, ultrafast electron microscopy, and laser-driven acceleration who want a clean derivation of the classical limit from the quantum wavefunction. It deserves a serious referee; the algebraic result is worth publishing, and the paper is honest about what remains to be done.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the strong-coupling PINEM interaction between a free-electron wavepacket and an optical near-field. Starting from the standard Bessel-sideband wavefunction in Eq. (2), the authors derive the mean energy transfer ΔE = 2gℏω cos(φ0) exp(−Γ0^2/2), where Γ0 = ℏω/(2σ_E). They show that when the intrinsic energy uncertainty σ_E is large compared with the photon energy, overlapping photon sidebands interfere to produce a net momentum kick that reduces to the classical point-particle result 2gℏω cos(φ0). They then introduce a pre-interaction drift in Eq. (5) and report APINEM spectral focusing and periodic energy/momentum bunching, contrasting these with the familiar post-interaction temporal bunching. The paper closes with a regime diagram and a discussion of experimental feasibility.

Significance. If the results hold, this work provides a conceptually clean bridge between quantized PINEM sidebands and classical laser acceleration, and it proposes a way to improve EELS energy resolution through chirp-induced spectral focusing. The central derivation is internally consistent: Eq. (3) follows from Eq. (2) by standard Bessel-function sum rules, and the direct numerical check reported in Fig. 1e supports the analytical formula. The predictions are falsifiable, including the cos(φ0) phase dependence, the exponential suppression in Γ0, and the optimal pre-drift length for spectral focusing. The paper also explicitly shows that decoherence destroys the effect, which is a clear statement of the experimental requirement. The APINEM part builds on the authors' earlier PRL (Ref. [11]), so the incremental contribution is the strong-coupling spectral focusing and bunching analysis rather than the APINEM concept itself.

minor comments (5)

[Optical spectral focusing, Eq. (5)] The chirp parameter ξ = 2σ_T^2/(m*ℏ) and the phase convention of the free-drift propagator are asserted without derivation. Because the subsequent focusing and bunching results depend on Eq. (5), the authors should either provide the standard free-propagation derivation in the main text or supplementary material, or explicitly identify the corresponding equation in Ref. [11].
[Eqs. (1) and (2)] Several equations are typeset in a broken or ambiguous way, making it difficult to verify the normalization prefactor in Eq. (2) and the gauge/phase convention in Eq. (1). A cleanly typeset version with all symbols defined is needed.
[Fig. 4 caption and text] The Fig. 4 caption and the related text disagree about which panel corresponds to the pre-chirped PINEM case and which corresponds to the LPA case; the panel labels should be made consistent.
[Strong-coupling condition and Eq. (3)] The text states that Eq. (3) is calculated at 2g ≫ 1, but the Bessel-sum derivation of the energy shift is valid for arbitrary real g. The authors should clarify whether the strong-coupling condition is needed for the physical interpretation or only for the point-particle limit.
[Terminology: LPA] The acronym LPA normally denotes a linear accelerator with a periodic or extended accelerating structure, whereas the effect described here is a single near-field interaction. The authors should state explicitly that 'linear' refers to the linear dependence of ΔE on the coupling parameter g, or introduce a less ambiguous term.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial self-citation in the APINEM section; the LPA derivation is self-contained and non-circular.

self citation load bearing [Optical spectral focusing from anomalous photon-induced near-field electron microscopy (APINEM) section, around Eq. (5); also the 'Momentum/energy periodically bunching' section citing ref. [11].]
"Secondly, to achieve the exact anomalous PIENM [11], the pre-interaction free drift has to be taken into account. If we introduce a pre-interaction drift duration (t0) into the initial electron wavepacket before near-field interaction, we expect ... (5) ... The linear dependence of APINEM momentum spacing to the optical wavelength and its inversely dependence to the pre-interaction drift length L0, is approximated to be δp(APINEM)=βλ(m*v0)/L0 [11]"

The APINEM analysis begins from Eq. (5), which is not derived in the present paper but is introduced as 'the exact anomalous PIENM [11]'; ref. [11] is Pan, Zhang, and Gover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 183204 (2019), whose authors include the present author Y. Pan. The anomalous spectral-spacing formula and its phase-space explanation are likewise imported from ref. [11]. Thus the APINEM 'emergence' and the spectral-focusing results are an application of the authors' own prior result rather than a self-contained derivation from the PINEM model. This is a load-bearing self-citation for the APINEM part. It does not make the LPA derivation circular, and the spectral-focusing extension adds new content, so the circularity is partial.

full rationale

The LPA result is not circular: the paper starts from the PINEM wavefunction Eq. (2), computes the mean energy shift using Bessel-function identities, and obtains Eq. (3); the statement that direct calculation from Eq. (2) matches the analytical formula is a consistency check, not a fit to data. The classical limit ΔE = 2għω matches e∫F dz because g is defined through the same interaction Hamiltonian, while the quantum-interference mechanism and the cos(φ0) e^{-Γ0^2/2} dependence are derived rather than assumed. The APINEM section, however, rests on ref. [11], the authors' own PRL: Eq. (5) is asserted as 'exact anomalous PINEM [11]' and the APINEM sideband spacing is quoted from [11]. Since the author lists overlap, this is a load-bearing self-citation for the APINEM portion. The spectral-focusing extension is new, so the paper is only partially circular rather than circular at the equation-identity level.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model is a standard PINEM wavefunction; the only quantities chosen by hand are the coupling g, the energy uncertainty sigma_E, and the phase phi0, all varied to display regimes. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (3)

g (coupling strength) = values 0.3 to 12 used in figures
The central results are shown for strong coupling; the value is an input chosen to demonstrate regimes, not fitted to external data.
sigma_E (intrinsic electron energy uncertainty) = 0.3 eV (UTEM) and 7.8 eV (APINEM)
The transition to LPA requires sigma_E > hbar omega; the paper argues this can be tuned experimentally, but the specific values are chosen for illustration.
phi0 (relative phase between optical field and electron) = 0, +-pi/2, pi
Determines the sign and existence of acceleration; shown in the inset of Fig. 1e and used in the APINEM focusing demonstrations.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The electron dynamics is governed by the relativistically modified Schrodinger equation with the near-field perturbation Hamiltonian H_int = (q/m*) p dot A (Eq. 1).
The central model; it assumes nonrelativistic longitudinal motion with an effective mass m* = gamma^3 m and ignores transverse components.
domain assumption Short-time interaction approximation: the optical near-field interaction time is short (<10 fs) so the field envelope is slowly varying and the wavefunction takes the Bessel-function-modulated Gaussian form in Eq. (2).
This is standard PINEM theory and is relied on throughout the paper.
domain assumption Neglect of decoherence in the main derivations.
Decoherence is only introduced qualitatively in Fig. 1h; the LPA and APINEM predictions assume a pure single-electron wavepacket.
standard math Bessel function identities, including J_{-n} = (-1)^n J_n and the summation identity sum_n J_n^2 = 1.
Used for normalization and for the anti-symmetric overlap argument near Eq. (3).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Emergence of Linear Particle Accelerator and Anomalous Photon-induced Near-field Electron Microscopy in a Strong Coupling Regime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UFDQ5KLK

@misc{pith2026190805740,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Emergence of Linear Particle Accelerator and Anomalous Photon-induced Near-field Electron Microscopy in a Strong Coupling Regime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UFDQ5KLK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05740}
}

abstract

Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy (PINEM) is a currently developing spectral approach that characterizes quantum electron-light interactions in electron energy gain/loss spectrum, with symmetrically discretized gains or losses of light quanta ($\hbar \omega$), coupled with a laser induced optical near-field. In this letter, we have demonstrated that Linear Particle Accelerator (LPA) and anomalous PINEM (APINEM) can analytically emerge from PINEM-kind interaction in a strong coupling regime, because of quantum interference of spectral photon sidebands overlap. Furthermore, we also found that the quantum interference in point-particle regime with pre-interaction drift can produce interesting optical spectral focusing and a periodically bunching of energy/momentum distribution that enable us to improve the spectral resolution of electron microscopy, imaging and spectroscopy. These observation of LPA and APINEM in strong laser physics can be of great interests for both theoretical and experimental communities, such as ultrafast electron microscopes, attosecond science and laser-driven accelerators.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

[11]

Pan, Y., Zhang, B., & Gover, A., Anomalous Photon-induced Near-field Electron Microscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 183204 (2019)

work page 2019
[1]

J., & Zewail, A

Barwick, B., Flannigan, D. J., & Zewail, A. H., Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy, Nature 462, 902-906 (2009)

work page 2009
[2]

E., Schauss, J., Yalunin, S

Feist, A., Echternkamp, K. E., Schauss, J., Yalunin, S. V., Schfer, S. & Ropers, C., Quantum coherent optical phase modulation in an ultrafast transmission electron microscope, Nature 521, 200-203 (2015)

work page 2015
[3]

J., Asenjo-Garcia, A., Kociak, M., Multiphoton absorption and emission by interaction of swift electrons with evanescent light fields, Nano letters, 10(5), 1859-1863 (2010)

Garcia de Abajo, F. J., Asenjo-Garcia, A., Kociak, M., Multiphoton absorption and emission by interaction of swift electrons with evanescent light fields, Nano letters, 10(5), 1859-1863 (2010)

work page 2010
[4]

G., Barwick, B., & Carbone, F., Electron diffraction by plasmon waves, Physical Review B, 94(4), 041404 (2016)

De Abajo, F. G., Barwick, B., & Carbone, F., Electron diffraction by plasmon waves, Physical Review B, 94(4), 041404 (2016)

work page 2016
[5]

M., Madan, I., Berruto, G., Wang, K., Pomarico, E., Lamb, R

Vanacore, G. M., Madan, I., Berruto, G., Wang, K., Pomarico, E., Lamb, R. J., McGrouther, D., Kaminer, I., Barwick, B., de Abajo, F. J. G., and Carbone, F., Attosecond coherent control of free-electron wave functions using semi-infinite light fields, Nature Communications 9, 2694 (2018)

work page 2018
[6]

Feist, A., Ultramicroscopy, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.12.005 (2016)

doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.12.005 2016
[7]

& Pan, Y., Dimension-dependent stimulated radiative interaction of a single electron quantum wavepacket, Phys

Gover, A. & Pan, Y., Dimension-dependent stimulated radiative interaction of a single electron quantum wavepacket, Phys. Lett. A 382, 1550-1555 (2018)

work page 2018

Show all 18 references

[8]

A., Soong, K., England, R

Peralta, E. A., Soong, K., England, R. J., Colby, E. R., Wu, Z., Montazeri, B., & Sozer, E. B., Demonstration of electron acceleration in a laser-driven dielectric microstructure, Nature 503, 91-94 (2013)

2013
[9]

Breuer, J., & Hommelhoff, P., Laser-based acceleration of nonrelativistic electrons at a dielectric structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 134803 (2013)

2013
[10]

E., Rathje, C., Yalunin, S

Priebe, K. E., Rathje, C., Yalunin, S. V., Hohage, T., Feist, A., Schäfer, S., & Ropers, C., Attosecond electron pulse trains and quantum state reconstruction in ultrafast transmission electron microscopy, Nat. Photonics 11, 793 (2017)

2017
[12]

J., Asenjo-Garcia, A., & Kociak, M

García de Abajo, F. J., Asenjo-Garcia, A., & Kociak, M. (2010). Multiphoton absorption and emission by interaction of swift electrons with evanescent light fields. Nano letters, 10(5), 1859-1863

2010
[13]

T., Lin, M., and Zewail, A

Park, S. T., Lin, M., and Zewail, A. H., Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy (PINEM): theoretical and experimental, New J. Phys. 12, 123028 (2010). 14

2010
[14]

Ponderomotive generation and detection of attosecond free-electron pulse trains, Phys

Kozák, M., Schönenberger, N., & Hommelhoff, P. Ponderomotive generation and detection of attosecond free-electron pulse trains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 103203 (2018)

2018
[15]

Morimoto, Y., & Baum, P., Diffraction and microscopy with attosecond electron pulse trains, Nat. Phys. 14, 252 (2018)

2018
[16]

Aidelsburger, M., Kirchner, F. O., Krausz, F., & Baum, P., Single-electron pulses for ultrafast diffraction, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(46), 19714-19719 (2010)

2010
[17]

Krüger, M., Schenk, M., & Hommelhoff, P., Attosecond control of electrons emitted from a nanoscale metal tip, Nature, 475(7354), 78 (2011)

2011
[18]

R., Gulde, M., & Ropers, C

Herink, G., Solli, D. R., Gulde, M., & Ropers, C. (2012). Field-driven photoemission from nanostructures quenches the quiver motion. Nature, 483(7388),

2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [11]

Pan, Y., Zhang, B., & Gover, A., Anomalous Photon-induced Near-field Electron Microscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 183204 (2019)

work page 2019

[2] [1]

J., & Zewail, A

Barwick, B., Flannigan, D. J., & Zewail, A. H., Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy, Nature 462, 902-906 (2009)

work page 2009

[3] [2]

E., Schauss, J., Yalunin, S

Feist, A., Echternkamp, K. E., Schauss, J., Yalunin, S. V., Schfer, S. & Ropers, C., Quantum coherent optical phase modulation in an ultrafast transmission electron microscope, Nature 521, 200-203 (2015)

work page 2015

[4] [3]

J., Asenjo-Garcia, A., Kociak, M., Multiphoton absorption and emission by interaction of swift electrons with evanescent light fields, Nano letters, 10(5), 1859-1863 (2010)

Garcia de Abajo, F. J., Asenjo-Garcia, A., Kociak, M., Multiphoton absorption and emission by interaction of swift electrons with evanescent light fields, Nano letters, 10(5), 1859-1863 (2010)

work page 2010

[5] [4]

G., Barwick, B., & Carbone, F., Electron diffraction by plasmon waves, Physical Review B, 94(4), 041404 (2016)

De Abajo, F. G., Barwick, B., & Carbone, F., Electron diffraction by plasmon waves, Physical Review B, 94(4), 041404 (2016)

work page 2016

[6] [5]

M., Madan, I., Berruto, G., Wang, K., Pomarico, E., Lamb, R

Vanacore, G. M., Madan, I., Berruto, G., Wang, K., Pomarico, E., Lamb, R. J., McGrouther, D., Kaminer, I., Barwick, B., de Abajo, F. J. G., and Carbone, F., Attosecond coherent control of free-electron wave functions using semi-infinite light fields, Nature Communications 9, 2694 (2018)

work page 2018

[7] [6]

Feist, A., Ultramicroscopy, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.12.005 (2016)

doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.12.005 2016

[8] [7]

& Pan, Y., Dimension-dependent stimulated radiative interaction of a single electron quantum wavepacket, Phys

Gover, A. & Pan, Y., Dimension-dependent stimulated radiative interaction of a single electron quantum wavepacket, Phys. Lett. A 382, 1550-1555 (2018)

work page 2018