Fractal deconfinement and confinement in Sierpinski ice

James Walkling; Roderich Moessner

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 54 references

Fractal deconfinement and confinement in Sierpinski ice

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read On the Sierpinski gasket, the six-vertex model confines charges entropically at the ice point, but a four-vertex limit deconfines them along a statistical fractal string of dimension $\log_2(5/2)$.

desk verdict Genuine new deconfinement result on the Sierpinski gasket, but the printed y=0 recursion has a repulsive fixed-point typo; the claims are repairable and the paper deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02741 v1 pith:UGKZBATH submitted 2026-08-03 cond-mat.stat-mech

James Walkling , Roderich Moessner This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.stat-mech MSC 82B2082B2628A80

keywords six-vertexmodelSierpinskigasketspinicefractaldeconfinementstringtensiondimensionartificialhierarchicallattice

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper analyzes the six-vertex model, the statistical mechanics of arrows on a lattice with two arrows in and two out at every vertex, on the Sierpinski gasket, a self-similar fractal lattice. It derives coupled recursion relations for the partition function and for configurations carrying a pair of opposite charges, and maps out the resulting phase diagram. At the equal-weight ice point, charges are entropically confined: the free energy grows linearly with separation, and the string between charges has a finite tension. In a four-vertex limit where one vertex type is forbidden, the string tension vanishes and the string joining two charges becomes a statistical fractal with dimension $\log_2(5/2)\approx 1.32$. The paper also shows how Sierpinski ice could be realized in an artificial spin ice by tuning the distances of magnetic island tips from the vertices.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by recursion relations inherited from the Sierpinski gasket's hierarchical structure (Eq. 1): for $y=z=\lambda$, $Z_{n+1}=\lambda^3 Z_n^3+2x^3 Q_n^3$ and $Q_{n+1}=\lambda x^2 Q_n^3+\lambda^2 x Q_n^2 Z_n$. The central quantities are $P_n=D_n/F_n$, measuring spin correlations, and $R_n=Z_n/Q_n$, measuring the relative cost of a string joining two charges. At the deconfined fixed point $R^*=2x/z$ (for $y=0$, $x\ge z$), the free-energy difference between any two string configurations vanishes, so all strings are equally weighted; comparing the two top-level routes of length $2\ell$ and $3\ell$ yields the mean-length recursion $\langle \ell\rangle_{n+1}=\tfrac{5}{2}\langle \ell\rangle_n$ and hence $d_l=\log_2(5/2)$. A dual-plaquette superspin construction, where the circulation of each flippable loop becomes an Ising variable, explains the $2^{N_S}$ degenerate states and the hierarchical coupling pattern.

What would settle it

Compute the recursion ratio $R_n$ for the $y=0$, $x>z$ model to high $n$: if $R_n$ diverges rather than approaching $2x/z$, the string tension is not zero and the deconfined fractal regime does not exist. Equivalently, enumerate or sample all $y=0$ configurations at finite $n$ and measure the mean string length: if $\langle \ell\rangle_{n+1}/\langle \ell\rangle_n$ does not tend to $5/2$ as $n$ grows, the fractal dimension is not $\log_2(5/2)$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the Sierpinski gasket, the six-vertex model admits exactly two qualitative fates for a pair of opposite charges, depending on the vertex weights. At the ice point $x=y=z$, a charge pair separated by distance $L$ feels a potential $\beta V(L)=L\ln\alpha$ with $\alpha\approx 1.7$, so the string has finite tension and confinement is purely entropic, arising even though all six vertices are degenerate. In the four-vertex limit $y=0$ with $x\ge z$, the ratio $R_n=Z_n/Q_n$ flows to the finite value $R^*=2x/z$, the string tension $\tau=\ln(R_n)/L$ tends to zero, and the string becomes a statistical fractal: coarse-graining replaces a string of length $\ell$ by either two or three copies with equal probability, giving $\langle \ell\rangle_{n+1}=\tfrac{5}{2}\langle \ell\rangle_n$ and fractal dimension $d_l=\log_2(5/2)\approx 1.32$. The low-energy states of this deconfined regime are encoded in an emergent Ising superspin model with hierarchically arranged couplings.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation of $d_l=\log_2(5/2)$ rests on the assumption that in the $y=0$, $x\ge z$ regime the fixed-point ratio $xQ_n/(zF_n)$ is exactly $1$, so every string configuration is equally weighted and the length-$2\ell$ and length-$3\ell$ paths are equally probable; if that ratio approaches any other constant, the string dimension changes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At the ice point on the gasket, charges are confined with a string tension $\tau=\ln\alpha\approx 0.54$ per bond, so there is no Coulomb phase: spin correlations decay exponentially with correlation length $\xi=2/(5\ln\alpha)\approx 0.75$ in units of the edge length.
In the $y=0$, $x\ge z$ regime, pairs of charges are deconfined and the string between them has fractal dimension $\log_2(5/2)\approx 1.32$, which is smaller than the gasket's Hausdorff dimension $\log_2 3\approx 1.58$.
The deconfined fixed point is approached only logarithmically in system size, $R_n/R^*\sim 1-1/\log_2(L)$, but the initial condition $R_0=2$ makes finite systems close to the fixed point when $x\approx z$.
The $y=0$ four-vertex model is exactly a hierarchical Ising antiferromagnet of superspins, with $2^{(3^n+1)/2}$ degenerate low-energy configurations and perfect spin correlations within each superspin.
Artificial spin ice built from nanomagnetic islands can be tuned toward either the degenerate ice point or the deconfined regime by adjusting island tip distances, and finite-generation experiments should distinguish the deconfined value $2^{d_l}\approx 2.5$ from the confined value $2$.
If the paper is right, the Sierpinski six-vertex model provides a concrete setting where deconfinement is not accompanied by a Coulomb phase but by a tensionless, statistically fractal string, a behavior absent on translationally invariant lattices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same recursion-ratio criterion suggests a general route to fractal deconfinement on any hierarchical lattice: whenever the coarse-grained ratio $R^*$ remains finite, the string dimension is set by the branching of allowed top-level paths at the fixed point rather than by microscopic weights.
Because the convergence to $R^*$ is only logarithmic, the asymptotic $n\to\infty$ statements may be impractical to verify by brute-force enumeration; comparing string-length ratios at successive small generations in an artificial-spin-ice experiment could already discriminate between the factor $5/2$ and the confining factor $2$.
The superspin mapping implies that known results for hierarchical Ising antiferromagnets, such as order-disorder behavior driven by the ratio $x/z$, could be imported to predict finite-temperature properties of the four-vertex model, which the paper analyzes primarily through its zero-temperature fixed point.
A natural test of the equal-weight assumption is to compute the ratio $xQ_n/(zF_n)$ directly in the $y=0$ model for finite $n$; a slow approach to $1$ with the predicted $1/n$ correction would corroborate the fractal dimension, while any sign of divergence would point to a different asymptotic string regime.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First, the headline: this is a real result in a clean setting — a four-vertex limit of the Sierpinski six-vertex model with a tensionless string whose mean length scales as log2(5/2). The recursion machinery is the right tool, and the paper does a good job extracting asymptotics from it. But there is a concrete error in the printed main-text/End-Matter recursion you should know about before reading further: Eq. (17) is not the correct ratio for the y=0 case. Substituting F=RC/2 into Eq. (16) gives R_{n+1}=(z/2x)R_n^2 - R_n + 2x/z, not the printed zR^2/(2x - R + 2x/z). The printed map has derivative 2+1/z at R*=2x/z, so it is repulsive; the paper's own fixed-point claim would fail. The supplementary's rescaled recursion rho_{n+1}=rho^2-rho+1 is exactly the correct map in disguise, so the final claims are repairable, but a reader who relies on the End Matter cannot reproduce the deconfined regime.

What is actually good: the generalization of the gasket ice recursion to the full six-vertex model is a useful step; the entropic confinement at the ice point with tau=ln alpha is clearly derived; and the superspin construction for y=0 is a nice new tool. The d_l result is genuinely new. The asymptotic equal-weight argument is not fully rigorous, but the stress-test note is right: you only need the two top-level diagram classes to balance, which follows from F/Q -> x/z. That can be stated more precisely than 'all strings are equally weighted'.

Soft spots elsewhere: the 'confinement almost everywhere' claim for general (x,y,z) rests on numerical recursion at n=30, which is fine but should be flagged as numerical evidence rather than proof. The experimental proposal is oversold: the dumbbell-model calculation gives a one-parameter family of vertex-degenerate geometries, but the claim about resolving a long-standing experimental obstacle needs micromagnetic simulation before publication. Table S2 itself shows only rough finite-size agreement.

Verdict: this is a serious paper. The core physics is sound; the errors are fixable typos and overclaims. My recommendation to the editor: send it to peer review. A good referee will catch the equation error and ask for the equal-weight statement to be tightened, but the fractal deconfinement phenomenon is worth the referee time.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the six-vertex model on the Sierpinski gasket with vertex weights (x,y,z). It derives exact recursion relations for the partition function and for constrained partition functions with charges on the corners, and uses them to compute the spin correlator, the string tension, and the fractal dimension of the string joining two charges. At the ice point x=y=z the string tension is claimed to be tau=ln(alpha), giving entropic confinement; in the four-vertex limit y=0, x>=z the tension vanishes and the string is argued to be a statistical fractal with dimension d_l=log_2(5/2). The paper also proposes an artificial spin ice design, based on the dumbbell model, to tune the vertex weights experimentally.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a valuable exactly solvable extension of six-vertex phenomenology to a finite-ramification fractal, with an unusual entropic confinement mechanism and a deconfinement transition to a tensionless string that is itself a statistical fractal. The recursion-based approach is a strength: the results are derived from exact hierarchical relations, no parameters are fitted to the target observables, and the growth rate alpha and the fixed point R*=2x/z emerge from the recursion equations. The d_l prediction and the finite-size scaling in Eq. (11) are specific and falsifiable, and the superspin mapping for y=0 provides a clean picture of the four-vertex ground-state degeneracy. The main caveat is that the central fixed-point recursion is misprinted in the End Matter and in the Supplementary; a correct version is present in the Supplementary derivation, so the final claims are repairable but the manuscript as written has a load-bearing gap.

major comments (2)

[End Matter, Appendix B, Eq. (17)] Equation (17) does not follow from the y=0 recursion relations in Eq. (16). Setting R_n=Z_n/Q_n=2F_n/C_n and substituting Eq. (16) gives R_{n+1}=(z^3 R_n^3+8x^3)/(2xz(zR_n+2x)), which after rescaling rho_n=zR_n/(2x) becomes rho_{n+1}=rho_n^2-rho_n+1. The printed expression zR_n^2/(2x-R_n+2x/z) is algebraically different and, more importantly, has derivative 2 at the fixed point R*=2x/z, making that fixed point repulsive; under the printed map the x>z line would not deconfine. The same incorrect intermediate expression appears in Supplementary Eq. (S7) before the rescaling to rho^2-rho+1. The main text and Supplementary must be made consistent, and the fixed-point analysis that supports F_n/Q_n ~ x/z in Eq. (10) should be attached to the correct map.
[Main text, "Fractal Deconfinement", around Eq. (10) and Fig. 3(a)] The derivation of d_l=log2(5/2) is stated through the assertion that all strings are equally weighted for tau=0. This is stronger than what the calculation establishes. What is actually needed, and what follows from the correct fixed point, is the asymptotic equality of the two coarse-grained diagram classes in Fig. 3(a), i.e. zF_n/(xQ_n) -> 1; the internal configurations within each class are recursively generated with the same asymptotic ratio. The authors should reformulate the argument in terms of this ratio and state explicitly that the equality is asymptotic in n. As printed, the sentence invites the incorrect reading that every individual string configuration has equal Boltzmann weight, and it is not tied directly to the recursion relations from which R* is obtained.

minor comments (4)

[Main text, Fig. 2(b) caption] The expression ln(tau)=ln(2^{-n} ln R_n) is ambiguous; it should be written as ln(tau)=ln((ln R_n)/2^n) so that the argument of the logarithm is clearly the finite-size string tension.
[Main text, "Sierpinski ice" and Fig. 2(b)] The statement that confinement holds "almost everywhere" in the full (x,y,z) parameter space is supported by n=30 flow data and an unstable fixed point, but no analytic proof is given for general parameters. The manuscript should distinguish the analytically proven results (the ice point and the y=0 line) from the numerically supported phase-diagram claim.
[Main text, Eq. (9)] Eq. (9) defines a generation-dependent effective dimension through the ratio R_{n-1}; the text should state explicitly that this quantity approaches its asymptotic value only as n->infinity, and in the ice case the limit is d_l=1.
[Supplementary, Table S2] For the first parameter set, the finite-size values 2^{d_l} are 2.60, 2.53, 2.50, 2.45, and 2.38 for n=1,...,5, which do not approach 5/2 monotonically. A brief comment on the expected direction and size of the finite-size corrections would help the reader judge the convergence to log2(5/2).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the fractal dimension d_l = log2(5/2) follows from the recursion fixed point, though End Matter Eq. (17) contains a non-circular algebraic typo.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The partition-function and correlator recursions (Eqs. (1), (12)-(16)) are set up diagrammatically from the six-vertex weights; the confinement exponent alpha, the finite fixed point R* = 2x/z, and the relation F_n/Q_n -> x/z are solutions of these recursions, not inputs. The fractal dimension d_l = log2(5/2) follows from the fixed-point equality of the two coarse-grained string classes in Fig. 3(a) (ratio xQ_n/(zF_n) -> 1), so the equal-weight statement is a consequence of the recursion, not an assumption imposed to produce d_l. No parameter is fitted to the target observables, and the few self-citations (e.g., Refs. [11, 40, 41, 44, 48]) supply background or standard tools (dumbbell model, artificial-spin-ice platforms) that are not premises of the main derivation. A separate, non-circular correctness concern: End Matter Eq. (17) and Supplementary Eq. (S7) print a rational map whose derivative at R* = 2x/z is 2 + 1/z > 1, whereas the correct elimination of Eq. (16) using R = 2F/C gives the semi-stable quadratic map rho_{n+1} = rho_n^2 - rho_n + 1 (i.e., R_{n+1} = z R_n^2/(2x) - R_n + 2x/z), which is what the Supplementary's own rescaling assumes; this is an algebraic typo or proof gap, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central results are derived from the model's exact recursion relations. The only nontrivial inputs are the diagrammatic enumeration (accepted as definition) and the asymptotic ansatze used for the ice point and for the equal-weight string ensemble in the deconfined regime.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Recursion relations of Eq. (1) and End Matter Appendix A correctly enumerate all configurations of the Sierpinski six-vertex model.
Presented via diagrammatic inspection of the three-subtriangle decomposition; all phase diagram results are derived from them.
domain assumption Asymptotic ansatz R_n ~ alpha^(2^n) at the ice point with alpha(t) > 1.
The supplementary verifies alpha(t) numerically but no closed-form proof is given; this underlies the confinement string tension tau = ln(alpha).
domain assumption In the y=0, x>=z fixed-point regime, all string configurations carry equal weight in the limit n→∞.
Used to obtain d_l = log_2(5/2); the argument rests on the diagrammatic ratio in Fig. 3(a) and the fixed point F_n/Q_n ~ x/z.

invented entities (1)

Superspin S_p
purpose: Encode the circulation of dual plaquettes in the y=0 four-vertex limit, reducing the low-energy manifold to 2^(N_s) independent Ising variables.
The superspin mapping is an internal theoretical reformulation; the paper provides no experimental or independent handle that tests the superspin itself, though it reproduces the exact recursion results within the model.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractal deconfinement and confinement in Sierpinski ice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UGKZBATH

@misc{pith2026260802741,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractal deconfinement and confinement in Sierpinski ice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UGKZBATH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02741}
}

abstract

We study the six-vertex model on the Sierpinski gasket, a four-coordinated hierarchical fractal with Hausdorff dimension $d_f=\log_23$. Given the importance of dimensionality for the long-wavelength behavior of such models, we specifically consider correlations and confinement as a function of the vertex weights, with the equal-weight point corresponding to the ice model. We calculate the partition function and correlators recursively to obtain a rich phase diagram hosting many different regimes. While the ice model shows entropic charge confinement, a particular four-vertex limit exhibits fractal deconfinement, with the string joining the deconfined charges itself a statistical fractal with fractal dimension $d_l=\log_2(5/2)\approx 1.3$. Finally, we propose a setup as an artificial spin ice to enable experimental study of the rich phenomenology of Sierpinski ice and its generalisations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02741 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Fractal deconfinement and superspins. (a) Two con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Potential experimental implementation of degenerate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Illustrations of diagrams for calculating different observables of interest in the main text alongside full recursion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

[1]

E. H. Lieb, Exact solution of the problem of the entropy of two-dimensional ice, Physical Review Letters18, 692 (1967)

work page 1967
[2]

E. H. Lieb, Exact solution of the F model of an antifer- roelectric, Physical Review Letters18, 1046 (1967)

work page 1967
[3]

E. H. Lieb, Exact solution of the two-dimensional Slater KDP model of a ferroelectric, Physical Review Letters 19, 108 (1967)

work page 1967
[4]

Sutherland, Exact solution of a two-dimensional model for hydrogen-bonded crystals, Physical Review Letters 19, 103 (1967)

B. Sutherland, Exact solution of a two-dimensional model for hydrogen-bonded crystals, Physical Review Letters 19, 103 (1967)

work page 1967
[5]

S. T. Bramwell and M. J. P. Gingras, Spin Ice State in Frustrated Magnetic Pyrochlore Materials, Science294, 1495 (2001), arXiv:cond-mat/0201427 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

work page Pith review arXiv 2001
[6]

J. D. Bernal and R. H. Fowler, A theory of water and ionic solution, with particular reference to hydrogen and hydroxyl ions, The Journal of Chemical Physics1, 515 (1933)

work page 1933
[7]

E. H. Lieb and F.-Y. Wu, Two-dimensional ferroelectric models, inPhase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 1, edited by C. Domb and M. S. Green (Academic Press, 1972) pp. 331–490

work page 1972
[8]

V. L. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one- dimensional and two-dimensional systems possessing a continuous symmetry group ii. quantum systems, Soviet Physics JETP34, 610 (1972)

work page 1972

Show all 54 references

[9]

J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics6, 1181 (1973)

1973
[10]

C. L. Henley, Classical height models with topological order, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter23, 164212 (2011)

2011
[12]

W.-T. Xu, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Tensor-network study of the roughening transition in a (2+1)D𭟋 2 lattice gauge theory with matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 036503 (2025)

2025
[13]

Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, M

D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, M. Hamdan, T. V. Zache, B. Braverman, M. Kornjaˇ ca, A. Lukin, S. H. Cant´ u, F. Liu, S.-T. Wang, A. Keesling, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and A. Bylinskii, Observation of string breaking on a (2 + 1)d rydberg quantum simulator, Nature642, 321–326 (2025)

2025
[14]

Borla, J

U. Borla, J. J. Osborne, S. Moroz, and J. C. Halimeh, String breaking in a 2+1dZ 2 lattice gauge theory (2025), 6 arXiv:2501.17929

2025 arXiv
[15]

Alexandrou, A

C. Alexandrou, A. Athenodorou, K. Blekos, G. Polykratis, and S. K¨ uhn, Realizing string breaking dynamics in aZ 2 lattice gauge theory on quantum hardware, Phys. Rev. D112, 114506 (2025)

2025
[17]

Suzuki, Phase transition and fractals, Progress of Theoretical Physics69, 65 (1983)

M. Suzuki, Phase transition and fractals, Progress of Theoretical Physics69, 65 (1983)

1983
[19]

J. M. Carmona, U. M. B. Marconi, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, and A. Taranc´ on, Critical properties of the ising model on sierpinski fractals: A finite-size scaling-analysis ap- proach, Phys. Rev. B58, 14387 (1998)

1998
[20]

Rammal and G

R. Rammal and G. Toulouse, Random walks on fractal structures and percolation clusters, Journal de Physique Lettres44, 13 (1983)

1983
[21]

Rammal, Random walk statistics on fractal structures, Journal of Statistical Physics36, 547–560 (1984)

R. Rammal, Random walk statistics on fractal structures, Journal of Statistical Physics36, 547–560 (1984)

1984
[22]

Isliker and L

H. Isliker and L. Vlahos, Random walk through fractal environments, Phys. Rev. E67, 026413 (2003)

2003
[23]

Weber, J

S. Weber, J. Klafter, and A. Blumen, Random walks on sierpinski gaskets of different dimensions, Phys. Rev. E 82, 051129 (2010)

2010
[24]

Z. F. Osseweijer, L. Eek, A. Moustaj, M. Fremling, and C. Morais Smith, Haldane model on the sierpi´ nski gasket, Phys. Rev. B110, 245405 (2024)

2024
[25]

X. Li, M. C. Jha, and A. E. B. Nielsen, Laughlin topology on fractal lattices without area law entanglement, Phys. Rev. B105, 085152 (2022)

2022
[26]

Brzezi´ nska, A

M. Brzezi´ nska, A. M. Cook, and T. Neupert, Topology in the sierpi´ nski-hofstadter problem, Phys. Rev. B98, 205116 (2018)

2018
[27]

Rojo-Franc` as, P

A. Rojo-Franc` as, P. Pansari, U. Bhattacharya, B. Juli´ a- D´ ıaz, and T. Grass, Anomalous quantum transport in fractal lattices, Communications Physics7, 259 (2024)

2024
[28]

Salvati, M

F. Salvati, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. A. Bagrov, Emer- gence of non-ergodic multifractal quantum states in geo- metric fractals, Communications Physics9, 24 (2026)

2026
[29]

G. Zhu, T. Jochym-O’Connor, and A. Dua, Topologi- cal order, quantum codes, and quantum computation on fractal geometries, PRX Quantum3, 030338 (2022)

2022
[30]

Biswas, S

S. Biswas, S. Yoshida, K. Wakabayashi, and S. Dutta, Spin-1 dirac dispersion and chern insulating phases in 2d honeycomb sierpi´ nski fractal (2026), arXiv:2606.29827

2026 arXiv
[31]

N. E. Myerson-Jain, S. Yan, D. Weld, and C. Xu, Con- struction of fractal order and phase transition with ryd- berg atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 017601 (2022)

2022
[32]

J. Zhou, M. Zelent, S. Parchenko, Z. Luo, V. Scagnoli, M. Krawczyk, L. J. Heyderman, and S. Saha, Preces- sional dynamics of geometrically scaled magnetostatic spin waves in two-dimensional magnonic fractals, Phys. Rev. B105, 174415 (2022)

2022
[33]

Mehta, M

R. Mehta, M. Moalic, M. Krawczyk, and S. Saha, Tun- ability of spin-wave spectra in a 2d triangular shaped magnonic fractals, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter35, 324002 (2023)

2023
[34]

Y. Dai, H. Wang, T. Yang, and Z. Zhang, Controlled magnetization reversal and magnetic spectra of artificial sierpinski-fractal structure, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials483, 70 (2019)

2019
[35]

Biesenthal, L

T. Biesenthal, L. J. Maczewsky, Z. Yang, M. Kremer, M. Segev, A. Szameit, and M. Heinrich, Fractal photonic topological insulators, Science376, 1114 (2022)

2022
[36]

M. Li, C. Li, L. Yan,et al., Fractal photonic anomalous floquet topological insulators to generate multiple quan- tum chiral edge states, Light: Science & Applications12, 262 (2023)

2023
[37]

J. N. Hall´ en, S. A. Grigera, D. A. Tennant, C. Castel- novo, and R. Moessner, Dynamical fractal and anoma- lous noise in a clean magnetic crystal, Science378, 1218 (2022)

2022
[38]

A. A. Kirillov,A Tale of Two Fractals(Springer, New York, 2013)

2013
[39]

Chang, L.-C

S.-C. Chang, L.-C. Chen, and H.-Y. Lee, The ice model and the eight-vertex model on the two-dimensional sier- pinski gasket, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications392, 1776 (2013)

2013
[40]

L. D. C. Jaubert, J. T. Chalker, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and R. Moessner, Three-dimensional kasteleyn transi- tion: Spin ice in a [100] field, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 067207 (2008)

2008
[41]

Nisoli, R

C. Nisoli, R. Moessner, and P. Schiffer, Colloquium: Ar- tificial spin ice: Designing and imaging magnetic frustra- tion, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1473 (2013)

2013
[42]

S. H. Skjærvø, C. H. Marrows, R. L. Stamps, and L. J. Heyderman, Advances in artificial spin ice, Nature Re- views Physics2, 13–28 (2019)

2019
[43]

R. F. Wang, C. Nisoli, R. S. Freitas, J. Li, W. McConville, B. J. Cooley, M. S. Lund, N. Samarth, C. Leighton, V. H. Crespi, and P. Schiffer, Artificial ‘spin ice’ in a geometri- cally frustrated lattice of nanoscale ferromagnetic islands, Nature439, 303–306 (2006)

2006
[44]

M¨ oller and R

G. M¨ oller and R. Moessner, Artificial square ice and re- lated dipolar nanoarrays, Physical Review Letters96, 237202 (2006)

2006
[45]

Perrin, B

Y. Perrin, B. Canals, and N. Rougemaille, Extensive de- generacy, coulomb phase and magnetic monopoles in ar- tificial square ice, Nature540, 410 (2016)

2016
[46]

I. R. B. Ribeiro, F. S. Nascimento, S. O. Ferreira, W. A. Moura-Melo, C. A. R. Costa, J. Borme, P. P. Freitas, G. M. Wysin, C. I. L. de Araujo, and A. R. Pereira, Realization of rectangular artificial spin ice and direct observation of high energy topology, Scientific Reports ...

2017
[49]

Gefen, A

Y. Gefen, A. Aharony, and B. B. Mandelbrot, Phase tran- sitions on fractals. iii. infinitely ramified lattices, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General17, 1277 (1984)

1984
[50]

Otsuka, Y

H. Otsuka, Y. Okabe, and K. Nefedev, Husimi-cactus ap- proximation study on the diluted spin ice, Phys. Rev. E 97, 042132 (2018)

2018
[51]

dual plaquettes

D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, M. Hamdan, T. V. Zache, B. Braverman, M. Kornjaˇ ca, A. Lukin, S. H. Cant´ u, F. Liu, S.-T. Wang, A. Keesling, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and A. Bylinskii, Observation of string breaking on a (2 + 1)d rydberg quantum simulator, Nature642, 321–326 (2025). 7 E...

2025
[52]

Gefen, B

Y. Gefen, B. B. Mandelbrot, and A. Aharony, Critical phenomena on fractal lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 855 (1980)

1980
[53]

Gefen, A

Y. Gefen, A. Aharony, Y. Shapir, and B. B. Mandelbrot, Phase transitions on fractals. ii. sierpinski gaskets, Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and General17, 435–444 (1984)

1984
[54]

J. M. Carmona, U. M. B. Marconi, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, and A. Taranc´ on, Critical properties of the ising model on sierpinski fractals: A finite-size scaling-analysis approach, Phys. Rev. B58, 14387 (1998)

1998
[55]

Y. Qi, T. Brintlinger, and J. Cumings, Direct observation of the ice rule in an artificial kagome spin ice, Phys. Rev. B77, 094418 (2008)

2008
[56]

M¨ oller and R

G. M¨ oller and R. Moessner, Magnetic multipole analysis of kagome and artificial spin-ice dipolar arrays, Physical Review B80, 140409 (2009)

2009
[57]

I. R. B. Ribeiro, F. S. Nascimento, S. O. Ferreira, W. A. Moura-Melo, C. A. R. Costa, J. Borme, P. P. Freitas, G. M. Wysin, C. I. L. de Araujo, and A. R. Pereira, Realization of rectangular artificial spin ice and direct observation of high energy topology, Scientific Reports7...

2017
[58]

F. S. Nascimento, L. B. de Oliveira, D. G. Duarte, C. I. L. de Araujo, W. A. Moura-Melo, and A. R. Pereira, Condi- tions for an emergent gauge field in planar artificial spin ices, Journal of Applied Physics135, 244307 (2024)

2024
[59]

Castelnovo, R

C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Magnetic monopoles in spin ice, Nature451, 42–45 (2008)

2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

E. H. Lieb, Exact solution of the problem of the entropy of two-dimensional ice, Physical Review Letters18, 692 (1967)

work page 1967

[2] [2]

E. H. Lieb, Exact solution of the F model of an antifer- roelectric, Physical Review Letters18, 1046 (1967)

work page 1967

[3] [3]

E. H. Lieb, Exact solution of the two-dimensional Slater KDP model of a ferroelectric, Physical Review Letters 19, 108 (1967)

work page 1967

[4] [4]

Sutherland, Exact solution of a two-dimensional model for hydrogen-bonded crystals, Physical Review Letters 19, 103 (1967)

B. Sutherland, Exact solution of a two-dimensional model for hydrogen-bonded crystals, Physical Review Letters 19, 103 (1967)

work page 1967

[5] [5]

S. T. Bramwell and M. J. P. Gingras, Spin Ice State in Frustrated Magnetic Pyrochlore Materials, Science294, 1495 (2001), arXiv:cond-mat/0201427 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

work page Pith review arXiv 2001

[6] [6]

J. D. Bernal and R. H. Fowler, A theory of water and ionic solution, with particular reference to hydrogen and hydroxyl ions, The Journal of Chemical Physics1, 515 (1933)

work page 1933

[7] [7]

E. H. Lieb and F.-Y. Wu, Two-dimensional ferroelectric models, inPhase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 1, edited by C. Domb and M. S. Green (Academic Press, 1972) pp. 331–490

work page 1972

[8] [8]

V. L. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one- dimensional and two-dimensional systems possessing a continuous symmetry group ii. quantum systems, Soviet Physics JETP34, 610 (1972)

work page 1972