Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 8 cited by

Regularizing 3D conformal field theories via anyons on the fuzzy sphere

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The fuzzy-sphere regularization of the 3D Ising CFT works at fractional electron fillings, where the charge sector is anyonic and barely mixes with the CFT spectrum.

desk verdict Fuzzy sphere at fractional fillings: a genuinely new capability with some circularity in the spectrum fit, but enough independent diagnostics to warrant a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15299 v2 pith:UGTMMJ57 submitted 2024-11-22 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.str-elhep-lat

Cristian Voinea , Ruihua Fan , Nicolas Regnault , Zlatko Papić This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elhep-lat
keywords fuzzysphere3DIsingCFTconformalfieldtheoryfractionalquantumHalleffectLaughlinstatemagnetorotonperturbationtopologicalentanglemententropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the fuzzy-sphere regularization of 3D conformal field theories needs a trivially gapped integer-filled Landau level, or whether it can operate on top of a strongly correlated, topologically ordered charge sector. The authors show that the 3D Ising CFT survives when the electrons form a $\nu=1/3$ Laughlin fractional quantum Hall state, whose charge sector hosts anyonic quasiparticles. They find that the CFT tower and the fractional quantum Hall collective modes (magnetorotons) sit at similar energies in finite-size spectra yet mix very weakly, and that the critical point is insensitive to the particles' exchange statistics and to whether the topological order is Abelian or non-Abelian. The upshot is that the fuzzy-sphere method is far less finely tuned than previously thought: a large class of gapped quantum Hall states can act as a substrate for a 3D CFT, opening the way to studying transitions between topologically ordered phases.

What carries the argument

The central object is the projected lowest-Landau-level bilayer Hamiltonian on a sphere threaded by a magnetic monopole, whose non-commutative geometry makes the sphere fuzzy and whose layer index acts as the Ising pseudospin. The argument is carried by the separation of energy scales: the charge gap and the magnetoroton gap—the gapped collective charge-density mode of the fractional quantum Hall state—stay finite through the transition while the CFT gaps vanish, so the low-energy space factorizes as $H \approx H_{\mathrm{CFT}} \otimes H_{\mathrm{gapped}}$. The only symmetry-allowed coupling between sectors, $V = \lambda \int d^2\Omega\, \epsilon(\Omega)\,\delta\rho(\Omega)$, is studied in conformal perturbation theory, and integrating out the magnetoroton produces a correction to the $\epsilon$ coupling proportional to $1/\Delta_{\mathrm{MR}}$, which the authors confirm by tuning the intralayer pseudopotential $V^{\mathrm{intra}}_1$.

What would settle it

Compute the finite-size scaling of the lowest magnetoroton at the critical field for larger systems, for example with more exact-diagonalization or matrix-product-state simulations: the paper predicts its energy rises relative to the closing CFT levels, so a roton gap that closes at $h_c$ or a growing overlap between roton and CFT states with increasing $N$ would refute the claimed decoupling. Alternatively, inspect the real-space entanglement spectrum at $h_c$: the chiral-boson counting that identifies the Laughlin state would be lost if the topological order broke down at the critical point.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors establish that the 3D Ising CFT can be realized on the fuzzy sphere at fractional filling, using the $\nu=1/3$ Laughlin state as the charge background. They show that although the CFT spectrum and the charge-neutral fractional quantum Hall spectrum (the gapped magnetoroton branch) coexist in the same low-energy window in finite systems, their mixing is strongly suppressed: the magnetoroton is identifiable by mean-field overlaps, its energy rises with system size while CFT gaps close, and conformal perturbation theory with the $\epsilon$ and $\epsilon'$ couplings brings exact-diagonalization levels into good agreement with bootstrap scaling dimensions. They further demonstrate that the critical point is unaffected by the exchange statistics of the particles (fermions versus bosons) and by the nature of the topological order (Abelian Laughlin versus non-Abelian Moore-Read), and that after subtracting the topological entanglement entropy of the charge sector, the remaining universal subleading term in the entanglement entropy—the $F$-function—follows the same flow as in the $\nu=1$ model. This supports an effective factorization of the low-energy Hilbert space, $H \approx H_{\mathrm{CFT}} \otimes H_{\mathrm{gapped}}$, with only a weak coupling between the conformal and anyonic sectors.

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on the assumption that the charge sector stays in the same gapped fractional quantum Hall phase all the way through the transition, so the low-energy physics cleanly splits into the critical spin sector plus a separate, gapped anyonic background that barely talks to it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The fuzzy-sphere approach no longer requires integer filling; any sufficiently gapped fractional quantum Hall charge sector with suitable effective interactions can act as a substrate for a 3D CFT.
  • Conformal perturbation theory works at fractional filling, extracting the critical field and CFT data (scaling dimensions of $\sigma$, $\epsilon$, $\epsilon'$, $\sigma_{\mu\nu}$, $\sigma_{\mu\nu\rho}$) with relative errors of roughly 1--4% at $N=8$ particles.
  • The critical point is insensitive to the exchange statistics (fermions versus bosons) and to whether the topological order is Abelian (Laughlin) or non-Abelian (Moore-Read), for the system sizes studied.
  • After subtracting the topological entanglement entropy of the charge sector, the entropic $F$-function flow matches the $\nu=1$ model, so the fractional charge sector is essentially invisible to the Ising CFT at the level of entanglement.
  • The framework sets the stage for realizing conformal critical points between topologically ordered states and for bilayer fractional quantum Hall experiments, where interlayer distance and tunneling can tune an effective transverse field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that the weak mixing is conditional on the roton dispersion: a charge sector with an almost gapless neutral mode (for instance, a fractional quantum Hall nematic state) would likely couple much more strongly to the CFT, potentially producing the hybridized CFT-FQH theories the authors mention only as a future direction.
  • We infer that the parity constraint observed in the Moore-Read model is generic to paired topological states: any charge substrate whose ground state exists only for even particle number will not supply a conformal vacuum, limiting fuzzy-sphere CFT extraction in such systems.
  • We infer that the correlation-length explanation for the finite-size drift of the critical field is testable by comparing Laughlin substrates at $\nu=1/3$, $1/5$, and $1/7$: if the drift grows as the filling factor decreases, that explanation gains support.
  • We infer that bilayer fractional quantum Hall systems with tunable layer separation could implement a pseudospin Ising transition in the laboratory, making the predicted critical spectrum a concrete experimental target.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends the fuzzy-sphere regularization of 3D CFTs to fractional electron fillings in which the charge sector is a gapped, topologically ordered fractional quantum Hall state. Focusing on a bilayer model at ν=1/3 with tuned pseudopotentials, the authors present exact-diagonalization and mean-field evidence for a Z2-breaking transition with the 3D Ising universality class: order-parameter scaling with the Ising exponent gives hc≈0.135, conformal perturbation theory (using the ϵ and ϵ′ couplings) gives hc≈0.13, the low-energy spectrum at finite-size critical fields shows approximate agreement with bootstrap scaling dimensions, and the magnetoroton branch of the Laughlin state can be identified by mean-field overlaps. The paper also reports an F-theorem analysis after subtracting a field-dependent single-layer FQH entanglement correction, and it presents analogous spectra for ν=1/2 bosons, ν=1/5 fermions, and the bosonic Moore-Read state at ν=1. The central claim is that the CFT and FQH spectra are only weakly mixed and that the critical point is insensitive to the exchange statistics and topological order of the charge sector.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper substantively broadens the applicability of the fuzzy-sphere method: the regularization would work even when the underlying charge sector is not a trivial integer quantum Hall state but a strongly correlated anyonic fluid, and it would open a route toward studying conformal critical points on top of topologically ordered states. The paper's strengths are its use of multiple complementary diagnostics (order-parameter scaling, gap scaling, conformal perturbation, state-operator comparison, F-theorem subtraction), the explicit specification of pseudopotentials and system sizes, and the use of publicly available exact-diagonalization software, which supports reproducibility. The main weakness is that the load-bearing factorization of the low-energy Hilbert space into a CFT sector and a gapped FQH sector is assumed rather than directly verified near the critical field, and part of the spectral match is tied to a fitting procedure. These issues are fixable and do not, in my reading, invalidate the central claim, but they need to be addressed before the broad conclusions are fully supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III A, Fig. 3; Appendix C, Eq. (C1)] The factorization H≈H_CFT⊗H_gapped in Eq. (C1) is load-bearing for the conformal-perturbation extraction of hc(Q), for the F-theorem subtraction in Section V, and for the abstract's claim that the CFT critical point is unaffected by the charge sector. However, the Laughlin topological order is explicitly verified by entanglement spectra only at h=0.1 and h=0.3 (Fig. 3), while the critical fields used in the spectral comparisons are h=0.135 (Fig. 7) and h=0.183 (Fig. 10). The finite charge gap at hc shown in Fig. 12(a) rules out a gapless charge sector but does not establish that the topological order is unchanged. Please add a direct check of the Laughlin phase at hc (for example, the orbital or particle entanglement spectrum at h=0.183 for N=8 and at h≈0.135 for the largest accessible sizes, or the topological entanglement entropy), and discuss the consequences if a charge-sector transition were present near hc.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A3); Table I] The model parameters are optimized by minimizing Eq. (A3), the squared difference between exact-diagonalization energies and conformal-bootstrap scaling dimensions for the σ and ϵ towers, and Table I then reports agreement for σ and ϵ. This part of the spectral match is partly by construction. I note that Table I also lists ϵ′, σμν, and σμνρ, which were not included in the cost function and therefore provide non-circular evidence. To strengthen this point, please make the out-of-sample nature of those rows explicit and report the sensitivity of the quoted scaling dimensions to the choice of states included in Eq. (A3) and to the system size, e.g., by comparing N=8 results with N=6 or N=10 at their own hc(Q).
  3. [Fig. 7; Sec. IV A] The statement that the mixing between the CFT and FQH spectra is 'strongly suppressed' is not fully supported at the accessible system sizes. In the L=4 even-parity sector the mean-field magnetoroton has overlaps 0.69, 0.16, and 0.09 with the three lowest eigenstates, so the FQH excitation is not sharply separated from the states used for the CFT comparison at N=8. The argument that the roton gap grows while the CFT gaps close (Fig. 12) is an extrapolation. Please quantify the mixing as a function of N, for instance by computing the weight of the low-energy CFT subspace in the FQH excitations or the effective coupling λ in Eq. (C1), and show that the mixing decreases with system size. Without such a trend, the spectrum comparison in Fig. 10 and Table I does not by itself distinguish a true critical point from a weakly avoided crossing.
  4. [Sec. V, Fig. 11] At ν=1/3 the text states that 'the accessible system sizes preclude a reliable extrapolation of the F-function.' Given this limitation, the assertion that the subtracted-entropy curve in Fig. 11 is 'a numerical demonstration of the F-theorem in 2+1D' for the fractional model is stronger than the data support. In particular, the subtraction uses the mean-field optimal polarization θopt, and any deviation of the true ground state from the Laughlin manifold near hc would bias the result. Please either soften the F-theorem claim for the fractional model or provide a quantitative uncertainty estimate for γ at the critical point, including the systematic error from the mean-field subtraction.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (5); Appendix A] Equation (5) lists V_inter={1,1,0.49,0.09}, while Appendix A reports the optimized N=8 values V2≈0.488 and V3≈0.087; please state explicitly that Eq. (5) uses rounded values and for which system size the optimization was performed.
  2. [Reference [57]] The reference 'A. B. Zomolodchikov' should be 'A. B. Zamolodchikov' (or 'Al. B. Zamolodchikov'); please correct the typo.
  3. [Fig. 11 caption] The caption says 'At h>hc, the F-function approaches zero,' but the text defines γcritical=γtopo+FIsing; please clarify the subtraction convention so that the reader can see whether the plotted quantity is the regularized constant after removing γtopo.
  4. [Appendix C, Eqs. (C3)-(C6)] The derivation of Eq. (C6) is explicitly qualitative (flat magnetoroton dispersion, short-distance form of the density correlator), but the notation in Eqs. (C3)-(C5) makes it look like a controlled calculation; please label the argument as a schematic estimate and state its range of validity.
  5. [Conclusion; Appendix D, Fig. 15] The non-Abelian Moore-Read example is demonstrated only for even particle number; for odd N the CFT tower is absent. The abstract's claim that the critical point is 'unaffected by the nature of topological order' should be tempered by this parity restriction, which is acknowledged in the text but not in the abstract.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity: the optimized fuzzy-sphere spectrum is tuned to conformal-bootstrap scaling dimensions, so the Table I match for the fitted operators is by construction; the critical-point claim retains independent support from order-parameter and g_epsilon=0 analyses.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Appendix A, Eq. (A3) and Table I (also used for the optimized models in Appendix D)]
    "To find the optimal tower structure, we perform a simple gradient descent, where the cost function is the sum of squared differences between ED energies and conformal bootstrap: δ = Σ(E_i − Δ_i)^2 (A3), where the energies E_i have been rescaled such that E_T = 3, and the set of states we optimize over is {σ, ∂σ, ∂∂σ,□σ} in the odd parity sector, and {ϵ, ∂ϵ, ∂∂ϵ,□ϵ} in the even parity sector. The optimal point at system size N = 8 was found to be V_inter_3 ≈ 0.087, V_inter_2 ≈ 0.488, h ≈ 0.185. ..."

    The model parameters are adjusted by minimizing the squared difference between ED energies and the conformal-bootstrap scaling dimensions Δ_i; Table I then presents the resulting 'Fuzzy Sphere' scaling dimensions against those same 'Bootstrap' values as evidence of agreement. For the operators appearing in the cost function (σ, ϵ and their descendants), the match is a measure of the fit residual, not an independent prediction. The circularity is partial: the ϵ′ and spinful primary rows of Table I are not in the fitted set, and the transverse field used in Table I is the independently extracted h_c(Q) from the g_ϵ = 0 condition rather than the gradient-descent value.

full rationale

The central conclusion that the 3D Ising CFT can be realized at fractional fillings does not reduce to the fitted spectrum alone. The critical field is located by two largely independent routes: the order-parameter crossing in Fig. 6 (h_c ≈ 0.135) and the vanishing of the relevant perturbation coupling g_ϵ in Fig. 9 (h_c ≈ 0.13), and the two agree. The claim of weak CFT–FQH mixing is supported by the magnetoroton identification via mean-field overlaps (Fig. 7), the opposite finite-size trend of the roton gap versus CFT gaps (Fig. 12b), and the near-identical regularized entanglement entropy compared to the ν = 1 model after subtraction (Fig. 11). The genuine circular step is the Appendix A model optimization: V_inter_2, V_inter_3 and h are chosen by minimizing Eq. (A3) against bootstrap scaling dimensions, and Table I then quotes agreement for the fitted operators; that agreement is by construction, though the ϵ′ and spinful primaries provide some out-of-sample content. The load-bearing factorization assumption H ≈ H_CFT ⊗ H_gapped (Appendix C, Eq. C1) is stated rather than proven, and Laughlin order is verified by entanglement spectra only at h = 0.1 and 0.3 (Fig. 3) with a finite charge gap shown at h_c (Fig. 12a); this is a support gap that would weaken the decoupling claim if the charge sector changed near h_c, but it is not a circular reduction of the derivation to its inputs. Overall, the paper has one partially constructed prediction while the central claim retains independent evidence, giving a score of 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on several external inputs and fitted parameters. The most important is the use of conformal bootstrap data both as the target for optimizing V2,V3,h and as the benchmark for the final comparison. The persistence of Laughlin topological order and the tensor-product factorization of the low-energy spectrum are assumed on the basis of finite-size evidence. No new particles or fields are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • V_inter^2 (ν=1/3 inter-layer pseudopotential at relative angular momentum 2) = 0.49 in Eq. (5); 0.488 after optimization at N=8 (Appendix A)
    Chosen/optimized to align the fuzzy-sphere spectrum with 3D Ising conformal bootstrap data; it is not fixed by any first-principles requirement.
  • V_inter^3 (ν=1/3 inter-layer pseudopotential at relative angular momentum 3) = 0.09 in Eq. (5); 0.087 after optimization at N=8
    Required to avoid accidental SU(2) symmetry (Appendix A); its value is tuned to improve CFT matching.
  • h (transverse field) = h=0.135 from order-parameter crossing; h≈0.183 at N=8 from g_epsilon=0; thermodynamic hc≈0.13
    The field is the tuning parameter for the Ising transition; at each finite size its critical value is estimated and in the N=8 optimization h is co-fitted with V2,V3.
  • V1,V2 pseudopotentials for ν=1/2 bosonic Laughlin model = V1=0.49, V2=0.10 (Appendix D)
    Optimized with the same cost function to realize the 3D Ising transition on a bosonic Laughlin substrate.
  • V4,V5 pseudopotentials for ν=1/5 fermionic Laughlin model = V4=0.37, V5=0.06
    Optimized with the same cost function to realize the transition at lower filling.
  • V1,V2 pseudopotentials for ν=1 bosonic Moore-Read model = V1=0.45, V2=0.09
    Optimized to realize the transition over a non-Abelian Moore-Read charge sector.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The 3D Ising CFT data from conformal bootstrap (e.g., Delta_sigma=0.5181489, OPE coefficients) are correct and can be used as reference.
    Used to locate hc via FSS, to compute conformal perturbation corrections (Eq. 14), and to define the Appendix A cost function (Eq. A3).
  • domain assumption The charge sector of the ν=1/3 model remains in the Laughlin phase for all h across the transition.
    Supported by entanglement spectrum counting at h=0.1 and 0.3 (Fig. 3) and by a finite charge gap at hc (Fig. 12a), but not directly probed at hc for every system size; if this failed, the CFT would not be decoupled from a changing topological sector.
  • ad hoc to paper Near criticality the low-energy Hilbert space factorizes as H ≈ HCFT ⊗ Hgapped, with only a weak coupling V = λ ∫ ε δρ (Appendix C, Eq. C1).
    Introduced to explain the observed decoupling and to compute the leading shift of g_epsilon; it is a modeling assumption, not derived from the microscopic Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption The fuzzy-sphere state-operator correspondence maps the LLL Hamiltonian on S^2 to a 3D CFT on S^2 × R.
    Borrowed from Zhu et al. Ref. [13]; the entire extraction of operator dimensions rests on it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regularizing 3D conformal field theories via anyons on the fuzzy sphere." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UGTMMJ57

@misc{pith2026241115299,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regularizing 3D conformal field theories via anyons on the fuzzy sphere},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UGTMMJ57}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15299}
}
abstract

Recently introduced ''fuzzy sphere'' method has enabled accurate numerical regularizations of certain three-dimensional (3D) conformal field theories (CFTs). The regularization is provided by the non-commutative geometry of the lowest Landau level filled by electrons, such that the charge is trivially gapped due to the Pauli exclusion principle at filling factor $\nu=1$, while the electron spins encode the desired CFT. Successful applications of the fuzzy sphere to paradigmatic CFTs, such as the 3D Ising model, raise an important question: how finely tuned does the underlying electron system need to be? Here, we show that the 3D Ising CFT can also be realized at fractional electron fillings. In such cases, the CFT spectrum is intertwined with the charge-neutral spectrum of the underlying fractional quantum Hall (FQH) state -- a feature that is trivially absent in the previously studied $\nu=1$ case. Remarkably, we show that the mixing between the CFT spectrum and the FQH spectrum is strongly suppressed within the numerically-accessible system sizes. Moreover, we demonstrate that the CFT critical point is unaffected by the exchange statistics of the particles and by the nature of topological order in the charge sector. Our results set the stage for the fuzzy-sphere exploration of conformal critical points between topologically-ordered states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15299 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Fuzzy sphere with a magnetic monopole at its [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Energy spectrum of the bilayer model in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Real-space entanglement spectrum of the ground [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Mean-field approximation for the bilayer Laughlin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Energy spectrum of the model in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The evolution of energy levels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Spectrum of the model in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Constant contribution to the regularized entangle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Conformal perturbation couplings, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Spectra of the optimal models for other examples [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Spectra of the optimal model for the Moore-Read [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Chern-Simons-matter conformal field theory on fuzzy sphere: Confinement transition of Kalmeyer-Laughlin chiral spin liquid

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A fuzzy-sphere exact diagonalization study shows the fIQH to bFQH transition is continuous, with emergent conformal symmetry and a single relevant singlet of scaling dimension Delta_S = 1.52(18).

  2. Conformal Operator Flows of the Deconfined Quantum Criticality from $\mathrm{SO}(5)$ to $\mathrm{O}(4)$

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A relevant scalar operator S persists from SO(5) to O(4) deconfined quantum criticality on the fuzzy sphere, indicating the O(4) transition is pseudo-critical rather than a genuine fixed point.

  3. Conformal scalar field theory from Ising tricriticality on the fuzzy sphere

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A bilayer quantum Hall fuzzy-sphere model, tuned to an Ising tricritical point, realizes the conformally coupled free scalar CFT, verified by matching spectra, operator content, and bosonic algebra.

  4. Flowing from the Ising Model on the Fuzzy Sphere to the 3D Lee-Yang CFT

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A fuzzy sphere Ising model with an imaginary longitudinal magnetic field reproduces the spectrum of the 3D Lee-Yang CFT at its critical point.

  5. Simulating the non-unitary Yang-Lee conformal field theory on the fuzzy sphere

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    By tuning a non-Hermitian quantum Hall Hamiltonian on a sphere, the authors obtain a conformal spectrum consistent with the (2+1)-dimensional Yang-Lee CFT and extract conformal data, including one previously unreporte...

  6. Free real scalar CFT on fuzzy sphere: spectrum, algebra and wavefunction ansatz

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fuzzy-sphere model is shown numerically to reproduce the spectrum, correlators, and oscillator algebra of the free real scalar CFT, and a wavefunction ansatz reaches high overlap with the Ising CFT ground state.

  7. Simulating Composite Fermion Excitons by Density Functional Theory and Monte Carlo on a Disk

    cond-mat.str-el 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A disk-geometry CF exciton construction with DFT and Monte Carlo reproduces the ν=1/3 magnetoroton dispersion and a chiral spin ±2 graviton spectral peak.

  8. The $O(N)$ Free-Scalar and Wilson-Fisher Conformal Field Theories on the Fuzzy Sphere

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fuzzy-sphere Hamiltonians realize the O(2), O(3) and O(4) Wilson-Fisher and free-scalar CFTs numerically, with spectra and correlators matching conformal bootstrap expectations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 8 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    The starting point are single-layer Hamil- tonians that realize the desired topological order, where m is the highest relative angular momentum that is pro- jected out

    Other models We propose the following approach for finding models at fractional filling for which the 3D Ising transition can be observed. The starting point are single-layer Hamil- tonians that realize the desired topological order, where m is the highest relative angular momentum that is pro- jected out. In the case of Laughlin states, for example, we h...

  2. [2]

    neutral fermion

    Some examples Here we provide some illustrations that our model, de- fined by Eq. (D1)-Eq. (D2) above, works. Using the same cost function as discussed in detail in Appendix A, we op- timize the spectrum for N = 8 bosons at ν = 1 /2 and find V1 = 0 .49, V2 = 0 .10, h = 0 .25. Fig. 14(a)-(b) shows the spectrum at this special point, demonstrating good agre...

  3. [3]

    Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed

    S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cam- bridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    P. D. Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal, Con- formal Field Theory , Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer, 1997)

    1997

  5. [5]

    A. M. Polyakov, Conformal Symmetry of Critical Fluc- tuations, JETP Lett. 12, 538 (1970)

    1970

  6. [6]

    Belavin, A

    A. Belavin, A. Polyakov, and A. Zamolodchikov, Infinite conformal symmetry in two-dimensional quantum field theory, Nuclear Physics B 241, 333 (1984)

    1984

  7. [7]

    Cardy, Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 1996)

    J. Cardy, Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 1996)

    1996

  8. [8]

    Poland, S

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov, and A. Vichi, The conformal bootstrap: Theory, numerical techniques, and applica- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015002 (2019)

    2019

Show all 103 references
  1. [9]

    J. L. Cardy, Conformal invariance and universality in finite-size scaling, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 17, L385 (1984)

    1984

  2. [10]

    J. L. Cardy, Universal amplitudes in finite-size scaling: generalisation to arbitrary dimensionality, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 18, L757 (1985)

    1985

  3. [11]

    Henkel, Conformal invariance and critical phenom- ena (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    M. Henkel, Conformal invariance and critical phenom- ena (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    A. M. L¨ auchli, Operator content of real-space entan- glement spectra at conformal critical points (2013), arXiv:1303.0741 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2013 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Y. Zou, A. Milsted, and G. Vidal, Conformal Data and Renormalization Group Flow in Critical Quantum Spin Chains Using Periodic Uniform Matrix Product States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 230402 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Y. Zou, A. Milsted, and G. Vidal, Conformal Fields and Operator Product Expansion in Critical Quantum Spin Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 040604 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    W. Zhu, C. Han, E. Huffman, J. S. Hofmann, and Y.-C. He, Uncovering Conformal Symmetry in the 3D Ising Transition: State-Operator Correspondence from a Quantum Fuzzy Sphere Regularization, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021009 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Z. F. Ezawa, Quantum Hall effects: Field theoretical approach and related topics (World scientific, 2008)

    2008

  9. [17]

    Madore, The fuzzy sphere, Classical and Quantum Gravity 9, 69 (1992)

    J. Madore, The fuzzy sphere, Classical and Quantum Gravity 9, 69 (1992)

    1992

  10. [18]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional quantization of the Hall effect: A hierarchy of incompressible quantum fluid states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 605 (1983)

    1983

  11. [19]

    C. Han, L. Hu, and W. Zhu, Conformal operator content of the Wilson-Fisher transition on fuzzy sphere bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 110, 115113 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    C. Han, L. Hu, W. Zhu, and Y.-C. He, Conformal four- point correlators of the three-dimensional Ising transi- tion via the quantum fuzzy sphere, Phys. Rev. B 108, 235123 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Hu, Y.-C

    L. Hu, Y.-C. He, and W. Zhu, Operator Product Expan- sion Coefficients of the 3D Ising Criticality via Quantum Fuzzy Spheres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 031601 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    J. S. Hofmann, F. Goth, W. Zhu, Y.-C. He, and E. Huff- man, Quantum Monte Carlo simulation of the 3D Ising transition on the fuzzy sphere, SciPost Phys. Core 7, 028 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Hu, Y.-C

    L. Hu, Y.-C. He, and W. Zhu, Solving conformal defects in 3D conformal field theory using fuzzy sphere regular- ization , Nature Communications 15, 3659 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Zhou and Y

    Z. Zhou and Y. Zou, Studying the 3d Ising surface CFTs on the fuzzy sphere (2024), arXiv:2407.15914 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Z. Zhou, D. Gaiotto, Y.-C. He, and Y. Zou, The g- function and defect changing operators from wavefunc- tion overlap on a fuzzy sphere, SciPost Phys. 17, 021 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Dedushenko, Ising BCFT from Fuzzy Hemisphere (2024), arXiv:2407.15948 [hep-th]

    M. Dedushenko, Ising BCFT from Fuzzy Hemisphere (2024), arXiv:2407.15948 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Cuomo, Y.-C

    G. Cuomo, Y.-C. He, and Z. Komargodski, Impuri- ties with a cusp: general theory and 3d Ising (2024), arXiv:2406.10186 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Z. Zhou, L. Hu, W. Zhu, and Y.-C. He, SO(5) De- confined Phase Transition under the Fuzzy-Sphere Mi- croscope: Approximate Conformal Symmetry, Pseudo- Criticality, and Operator Spectrum, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021044 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Zhou and Y.-C

    Z. Zhou and Y.-C. He, A new series of 3D CFTs with Sp( N ) global symmetry on fuzzy sphere (2024), arXiv:2410.00087 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    R. B. Laughlin, Anomalous quantum Hall effect: An incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395 (1983)

    1983

  23. [31]

    J. K. Jain, Composite-fermion approach for the frac- tional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 199 (1989)

    1989

  24. [32]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Nucl. Phys. B 360, 362 (1991)

    1991

  25. [33]

    Arovas, J

    D. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, and F. Wilczek, Fractional statistics and the quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 722 (1984)

    1984

  26. [34]

    J. K. Jain, Composite Fermions (Cambridge University Press, New York, US, 2007)

    2007

  27. [35]

    S. M. Girvin, A. H. MacDonald, and P. M. Platzman, Collective-Excitation Gap in the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 581 (1985)

    1985

  28. [36]

    S. M. Girvin, A. H. MacDonald, and P. M. Platzman, Magneto-roton theory of collective excitations in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 33, 2481 (1986)

    1986

  29. [37]

    Pinczuk, B

    A. Pinczuk, B. S. Dennis, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Observation of collective excitations in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3983 (1993)

    1993

  30. [38]

    M. Kang, A. Pinczuk, B. S. Dennis, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Observation of multiple magnetorotons in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2637 (2001)

    2001

  31. [39]

    I. V. Kukushkin, J. H. Smet, V. W. Scarola, V. Uman- sky, and K. von Klitzing, Dispersion of the excitations of fractional quantum Hall states, Science 324, 1044 15 (2009)

    2009

  32. [40]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Geometrical description of the frac- tional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 116801 (2011)

    2011

  33. [41]

    T. Can, M. Laskin, and P. Wiegmann, Fractional quantum Hall effect in a curved space: Gravitational anomaly and electromagnetic response, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 046803 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    Ferrari and S

    F. Ferrari and S. Klevtsov, FQHE on curved back- grounds, free fields and large N, Journal of High Energy Physics 2014, 86 (2014)

    2014

  35. [43]

    Gromov and A

    A. Gromov and A. G. Abanov, Density-Curvature Re- sponse and Gravitational Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 266802 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    Bradlyn and N

    B. Bradlyn and N. Read, Low-energy effective theory in the bulk for transport in a topological phase, Phys. Rev. B 91, 125303 (2015)

    2015

  37. [45]

    Y. You, G. Y. Cho, and E. Fradkin, Nematic quantum phase transition of composite Fermi liquids in half-filled Landau levels and their geometric response, Phys. Rev. B 93, 205401 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    Gromov and D

    A. Gromov and D. T. Son, Bimetric theory of fractional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041032 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    D. X. Nguyen, A. Gromov, and D. T. Son, Fractional quantum Hall systems near nematicity: Bimetric the- ory, composite fermions, and Dirac brackets, Phys. Rev. B 97, 195103 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Dirac monopole without strings: Monopole harmonics, Nucl. Phys. B 107, 365 (1976)

    1976

  41. [49]

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Some properties of monopole harmonics, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1018 (1977)

    1977

  42. [50]

    S. M. G. Richard E. Prange, ed., The Quantum Hall Effect (Springer-Verlag New York, 1987)

    1987

  43. [51]

    X. G. Wen and A. Zee, Shift and spin vector: New topo- logical quantum numbers for the Hall fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 953 (1992)

    1992

  44. [52]

    Halperin and J

    B. Halperin and J. Jain, Fractional Quantum Hall Ef- fects: New Developments (World Scientific Publishing Company, 2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    Papi´ c, M

    Z. Papi´ c, M. O. Goerbig, N. Regnault, and M. V. Milo- vanovi´ c, Tunneling-driven breakdown of the 331 state and the emergent Pfaffian and composite Fermi liquid phases, Phys. Rev. B 82, 075302 (2010)

    2010

  46. [54]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum Hall effect states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 010504 (2008)

    2008

  47. [55]

    Thiebaut, M

    N. Thiebaut, M. O. Goerbig, and N. Regnault, Two- component fractional quantum Hall effect in the half- filled lowest Landau level in an asymmetric wide quan- tum well, Phys. Rev. B 89, 195421 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    Simmons-Duffin, The lightcone bootstrap and the spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT, Journal of High Energy Physics 2017, 86 (2017)

    D. Simmons-Duffin, The lightcone bootstrap and the spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT, Journal of High Energy Physics 2017, 86 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    Fardelli, A

    G. Fardelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, and E. Katz, Constructing the Infrared Conformal Generators on the Fuzzy Sphere (2024), arXiv:2409.02998 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Fan, Note on explicit construction of conformal gen- erators on the fuzzy sphere (2024), arXiv:2409.08257 [hep-th]

    R. Fan, Note on explicit construction of conformal gen- erators on the fuzzy sphere (2024), arXiv:2409.08257 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Irreversibility

    A. B. Zomolodchikov, “Irreversibility” of the flux of the renormalization group in a 2D field theory, JETP Let- ters 43, 565 (1986)

    1986

  52. [60]

    Lao and S

    B.-X. Lao and S. Rychkov, 3D Ising CFT and exact diagonalization on icosahedron: The power of conformal perturbation theory, SciPost Phys. 15, 243 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    A. M. L¨ auchli, L. Herviou, P. H. Wilhelm, and S. Rychkov, Exact diagonalization, matrix product states and conformal perturbation theory study of a 3d ising fuzzy sphere model (2025), arXiv:2504.00842 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2025

  54. [62]

    Sterdyniak, A

    A. Sterdyniak, A. Chandran, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, and P. Bonderson, Real-space entanglement spectrum of quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B 85, 125308 (2012)

    2012

  55. [63]

    Dubail, N

    J. Dubail, N. Read, and E. H. Rezayi, Edge-state inner products and real-space entanglement spectrum of trial quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B 86, 245310 (2012)

    2012

  56. [64]

    D. L. Jafferis, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and B. R. Safdi, Towards the F-theorem: N = 2 field theories on the three-sphere, Journal of High Energy Physics 2011, 102 (2011)

    2011

  57. [65]

    R. C. Myers and A. Sinha, Holographic c-theorems in arbitrary dimensions, Journal of High Energy Physics 2011, 125 (2011)

    2011

  58. [66]

    Casini, M

    H. Casini, M. Huerta, and R. C. Myers, Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, Jour- nal of High Energy Physics 2011, 36 (2011)

    2011

  59. [67]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta, A c-theorem for entanglement entropy, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and The- oretical 40, 7031 (2007)

    2007

  60. [68]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological Entanglement En- tropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006)

    2006

  61. [69]

    Levin and X.-G

    M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Detecting Topological Order in a Ground State Wave Function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110405 (2006)

    2006

  62. [70]

    Grover, Entanglement Monotonicity and the Stabil- ity of Gauge Theories in Three Spacetime Dimensions, Phys

    T. Grover, Entanglement Monotonicity and the Stabil- ity of Gauge Theories in Three Spacetime Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 151601 (2014)

    2014

  63. [71]

    L. Hu, W. Zhu, and Y.-C. He, Entropic F -function of 3D Ising conformal field theory via the fuzzy sphere reg- ularization (2024), arXiv:2401.17362 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    I. D. Rodr ´ ıguez and G. Sierra, Entanglement entropy of integer quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B 80, 153303 (2009)

    2009

  65. [73]

    L. Fei, S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov, and G. Tarnopolsky, Generalized F-theorem and the ϵ expansion, J. High En- ergy Phys. 2015 (12), 1

    2015

  66. [74]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267 (2000)

    2000

  67. [75]

    Barkeshli and X.-G

    M. Barkeshli and X.-G. Wen, Anyon Condensation and Continuous Topological Phase Transitions in Non- Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 216804 (2010)

    2010

  68. [76]

    Barkeshli and X.-G

    M. Barkeshli and X.-G. Wen, Bilayer quantum Hall phase transitions and the orbifold non-Abelian frac- tional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B 84, 115121 (2011)

    2011

  69. [77]

    Zhang, Z

    Y.-H. Zhang, Z. Zhu, and A. Vishwanath, XY* Transi- tion and Extraordinary Boundary Criticality from Frac- tional Exciton Condensation in Quantum Hall Bilayer, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031023 (2023)

    2023

  70. [78]

    Wu, H.-H

    Y.-H. Wu, H.-H. Tu, and M. Cheng, Continuous Phase Transitions between Fractional Quantum Hall States and Symmetry-Protected Topological States, Phys. 16 Rev. Lett. 131, 256502 (2023)

    2023

  71. [79]

    Eisenstein, Exciton condensation in bilayer quantum Hall systems, Annu

    J. Eisenstein, Exciton condensation in bilayer quantum Hall systems, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 159 (2014)

    2014

  72. [80]

    S. K. Singh, C. Wang, C. T. Tai, C. S. Calhoun, K. A. Villegas Rosales, P. T. Madathil, A. Gupta, K. W. Bald- win, L. N. Pfeiffer, and M. Shayegan, Topological phase transition between Jain states and daughter states of the ν = 1/2 fractional quantum Hall state, Nature Physics...

    2024

  73. [81]

    J. I. A. Li, Q. Shi, Y. Zeng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, and C. R. Dean, Pairing states of composite fermions in double-layer graphene, Nature Physics 15, 898 (2019)

    2019

  74. [82]

    C. Wang, A. Gupta, S. K. Singh, P. T. Madathil, Y. J. Chung, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Baldwin, R. Winkler, and M. Shayegan, Fractional Quantum Hall State at Filling Factor ν = 1 /4 in Ultra-High-Quality GaAs Two-Dimensional Hole Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 266502 (2023)

    2023

  75. [83]

    Mulligan, C

    M. Mulligan, C. Nayak, and S. Kachru, Isotropic to anisotropic transition in a fractional quantum Hall state, Phys. Rev. B 82, 085102 (2010)

    2010

  76. [84]

    Maciejko, B

    J. Maciejko, B. Hsu, S. A. Kivelson, Y. Park, and S. L. Sondhi, Field theory of the quantum Hall nematic tran- sition, Phys. Rev. B 88, 125137 (2013)

    2013

  77. [85]

    Y. You, G. Y. Cho, and E. Fradkin, Theory of Nematic Fractional Quantum Hall States, Phys. Rev. X4, 041050 (2014)

    2014

  78. [86]

    S. Pu, A. C. Balram, J. Taylor, E. Fradkin, and Z. Papi´ c, Microscopic Model for Fractional Quantum Hall Nemat- ics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236503 (2024)

    2024

  79. [87]

    DiagHam, https://www.nick-ux.org/diagham

  80. [88]

    Zhou, FuzzifiED – Julia package for numerics on the fuzzy sphere (2025), arXiv:2503.00100 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Z. Zhou, FuzzifiED – Julia package for numerics on the fuzzy sphere (2025), arXiv:2503.00100 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025

  81. [89]

    G. Fano, F. Ortolani, and E. Colombo, Configuration- interaction calculations on the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 34, 2670 (1986)

    1986

  82. [90]

    R. H. Morf, N. d’Ambrumenil, and S. Das Sarma, Exci- tation gaps in fractional quantum Hall states: An exact diagonalization study, Phys. Rev. B 66, 075408 (2002)

    2002

  83. [91]

    J. K. Jain and R. K. Kamilla, Composite fermions in the Hilbert space of the lowest electronic Landau level, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 11, 2621 (1997)

    1997

  84. [92]

    A. C. Balram and A. W´ ojs, Fractional quantum Hall effect at ν = 2 + 4 /9, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 032035 (2020)

    2020

  85. [93]

    R. Morf, N. d’Ambrumenil, and B. I. Halperin, Micro- scopic wave functions for the fractional quantized Hall states at ν = 2 5 and 2 7 , Phys. Rev. B 34, 3037 (1986)

    1986

  86. [94]

    Yang, Z.-X

    B. Yang, Z.-X. Hu, Z. Papi´ c, and F. D. M. Haldane, Model wave functions for the collective modes and the magnetoroton theory of the fractional quantum Hall ef- fect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 256807 (2012)

    2012

  87. [95]

    Estienne, N

    B. Estienne, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Correla- tion lengths and topological entanglement entropies of unitary and nonunitary fractional quantum Hall wave functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 186801 (2015)

    2015

  88. [96]

    N. R. Cooper and N. K. Wilkin, Composite fermion de- scription of rotating Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. B 60, R16279 (1999)

    1999

  89. [97]

    N. R. Cooper, N. K. Wilkin, and J. M. F. Gunn, Quan- tum Phases of Vortices in Rotating Bose-Einstein Con- densates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 120405 (2001)

    2001

  90. [98]

    L´ eonard, S

    J. L´ eonard, S. Kim, J. Kwan, P. Segura, F. Grusdt, C. Repellin, N. Goldman, and M. Greiner, Realization of a fractional quantum Hall state with ultracold atoms, Nature 619, 495 (2023)

    2023

  91. [99]

    Wang, F.-M

    C. Wang, F.-M. Liu, M.-C. Chen, H. Chen, X.-H. Zhao, C. Ying, Z.-X. Shang, J.-W. Wang, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Z. Peng, X. Zhu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Realization of fractional quantum Hall state with interacting photons, Science 384, 579 (2024)

    2024

  92. [100]

    Regnault and T

    N. Regnault and T. Jolicoeur, Quantum Hall fractions for spinless bosons, Phys. Rev. B 69, 235309 (2004)

    2004

  93. [101]

    Nayak and F

    C. Nayak and F. Wilczek, 2n-quasihole states realize 2(n-1)-dimensional spinor braiding statistics in paired quantum Hall states, Nucl. Phys. B 479, 529 (1996)

    1996

  94. [102]

    Bonderson, A

    P. Bonderson, A. E. Feiguin, and C. Nayak, Numerical calculation of the neutral fermion gap at the ν = 5 /2 fractional quantum hall state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 186802 (2011)

    2011

  95. [103]

    M¨ oller, A

    G. M¨ oller, A. W´ ojs, and N. R. Cooper, Neutral fermion excitations in the Moore-Read state at filling factor ν = 5/2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 036803 (2011)

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.