Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Understanding Deep Learning from Noisy Labels with Small-Loss Criterion

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.09291 v1 pith:UHCWB2HR submitted 2021-06-17 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords labelsnoisycriterionsmall-lossdeepexplainexplanationlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks need large amounts of labeled data to achieve good performance. In real-world applications, labels are usually collected from non-experts such as crowdsourcing to save cost and thus are noisy. In the past few years, deep learning methods for dealing with noisy labels have been developed, many of which are based on the small-loss criterion. However, there are few theoretical analyses to explain why these methods could learn well from noisy labels. In this paper, we theoretically explain why the widely-used small-loss criterion works. Based on the explanation, we reformalize the vanilla small-loss criterion to better tackle noisy labels. The experimental results verify our theoretical explanation and also demonstrate the effectiveness of the reformalization.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools