REVIEW 2 cited by
A Demonstration of Adaptive Collaboration of Large Language Models for Medical Decision-Making
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Medical Decision-Making (MDM) is a multi-faceted process that requires clinicians to assess complex multi-modal patient data patient, often collaboratively. Large Language Models (LLMs) promise to streamline this process by synthesizing vast medical knowledge and multi-modal health data. However, single-agent are often ill-suited for nuanced medical contexts requiring adaptable, collaborative problem-solving. Our MDAgents addresses this need by dynamically assigning collaboration structures to LLMs based on task complexity, mimicking real-world clinical collaboration and decision-making. This framework improves diagnostic accuracy and supports adaptive responses in complex, real-world medical scenarios, making it a valuable tool for clinicians in various healthcare settings, and at the same time, being more efficient in terms of computing cost than static multi-agent decision making methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Human-LLM Dialogue Improves Diagnostic Accuracy in Emergency Care
Interactive LLM dialogue raised residents' hard-case diagnostic correctness from 0.589 to 0.734 and produced medium effect sizes in a blinded study of seven physicians on 52 emergency cases.
-
Modeling Clinical Concern Trajectories in Language Model Agents
Second-order dynamical integration of LLM risk outputs produces smooth anticipatory concern trajectories in synthetic ward scenarios, unlike the sharp cliffs from stateless agents.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.